WCS2.1 Met-Ocean. 16 th Workshop on Operational Systems. Crown copyright Met Office

Similar documents
An Outline of a WCS2.0 MetOC Profile for discussion. Crown copyright Met Office

Prototyping WCS 2.0 extension for meteorological grid handling

NOAA NextGen IT/Web Services (NGITWS)

Open GeoSpatial Consortium Inc.

Beyond Rasters: Introducing The New OGC Web Coverage Service 2.0

Open Geospatial Consortium Inc.

The Logical Data Store

NOTICE. This document is only one section of a larger document. All sections together collectively form the NNEW Documentation.

Open Geospatial Consortium Inc.

Uniform Resource Locator Wide Area Network World Climate Research Programme Coupled Model Intercomparison

First experiences of using WC(P)S at ECMWF

OGC at KNMI: Current use and plans

Abstract. Introduction. OGC Web Coverage Service 2.0

A JSON format (and tools) for Coverage data. OGC Technical Committee Dublin, Ireland Maik Riechert 22 June 2016

Open Geospatial Consortium

Python: Working with Multidimensional Scientific Data. Nawajish Noman Deng Ding

International Civil Aviation Organization THE SECOND MEETING OF SYSTEM WIDE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE (SWIM TF/2)

Best Practices for using OGC WMS with Time-Dependent or Elevation-Dependent Data

OGC WCS 2.0 Revision Notes

Bruce Wright, John Ward, Malcolm Field, Met Office, United Kingdom

Working with Scientific Data in ArcGIS Platform

Web Coverage Services (WCS)

Serving Large-Scale Coverages - How to Tame an Elephant

MetOcean Themes in INSPIRE

Using the Network Common Data Form for storage of atmospheric data

Reducing Consumer Uncertainty

cdo Data Processing (and Production) Luis Kornblueh, Uwe Schulzweida, Deike Kleberg, Thomas Jahns, Irina Fast

Ocean, Atmosphere & Climate Model Assessment for Everyone

Leveraging OGC Standards on ArcGIS Server

SciSpark 201. Searching for MCCs

OGC Testbed 10 Engineering Report: Aviation Dissemination of Weather Data

Open Geospatial Consortium

PF-III User Guide for GUI and API - validation phase

Online intercomparison of models and observations using OGC and community standards

SESAR WP8 Early Project 2 MET Data Fusion Demonstrator

Lynnes, Yang, Hu, Domenico and Enloe Category: Technical Note March Interoperability between OGC CS/W and WCS Protocols

The challenges of the ECMWF graphics packages

14A.2 OPEN AND INTEROPERABLE NWS GEOSPATIAL DATA FROM NOAA IDP NEXTGEN IT WEB SERVICES 1. INTRODUCTION

Disseminating WXXM Data via A Web Feature Service

Reporting of modelled data under the AQD IPR for e-reporting

Open Geospatial Consortium

Cloud scaling of Visual Weather

Motions from the 91st OGC Technical and Planning Committee Meetings Geneva, Switzerland Contents

Scientific and Multidimensional Raster Support in ArcGIS

Spatial Data on the Web

Observations and Measurements as a basis for semantic reconciliation between GRIB and netcdf... and some other ideas.

Reducing Consumer Uncertainty Towards a Vocabulary for User-centric Geospatial Metadata

Sensor Web when sensor networks meet the World-Wide Web

Existing Solutions. Operating data services: Climate Explorer ECA&D climate4impact.eu data.knmi.nl

Using ESML in a Semantic Web Approach for Improved Earth Science Data Usability

Spatio-Temporal Big Data: - the rasdaman approach

Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee. Dr Vasily Smolyanitsky, JCOMM ETSI chair

Catalog-driven, Reproducible Workflows for Ocean Science

The CEDA Web Processing Service for rapid deployment of earth system data services

Leveraging OGC Services in ArcGIS Server. Satish Sankaran Yingqi Tang

Distributed Online Data Access and Analysis

Interactive Web Mapping: Overview

Desarrollo de una herramienta de visualización de datos oceanográficos: Modelos y Observaciones

New Datasets, Functionality and Future Development. Ashwanth Srinivasan, (FSU) Steve Hankin (NOAA/PMEL) Major contributors: Jon Callahan (Mazama(

Toward the Development of a Comprehensive Data & Information Management System for THORPEX

Observations and Measurements

A ONE-STOP SERVICE HUB INTEGRATING ESSENTIAL WEATHER AND GEOPHYSICAL INFORMATION ON A GIS PLATFORM. Hong Kong Observatory

Leveraging metadata standards in ArcGIS to support Interoperability. Aleta Vienneau and Marten Hogeweg

AWIPS Technology Infusion Darien Davis NOAA/OAR Forecast Systems Laboratory Systems Development Division April 12, 2005

GRIB Background & OGC Foreground

_ LUCIADFUSION V PRODUCT DATA SHEET _ LUCIADFUSION PRODUCT DATA SHEET

EGI Programmatic Access User Documentation

Introduction to ECMWF resources:

A Climate Monitoring architecture for space-based observations

The 4-Dimensional Weather Data Cube

GML Application Schema for Meteorological Objects

A Review for Semantic Sensor Web Research and Applications

OGC Best Practices for using Web Map Services (WMS) with Time-Dependent or Elevation-Dependent Data

INSPIRE WCS: From Mystery to Mastery

INSPIRE KEN Follow-Up Webinar on Coverages & WCS

Leveraging metadata standards in ArcGIS to support Interoperability. David Danko and Aleta Vienneau

Integrating OGC web services into Metview and Magics++

GeoDCAT-AP Representing geographic metadata by using the "DCAT application profile for data portals in Europe"

Long-term preservation for INSPIRE: a metadata framework and geo-portal implementation

Scientific Data Plat f or m

Converging Remote Sensing and Data Assimilation through Data Fusion

Spatial Data on the Web

Metadata for Data Discovery: The NERC Data Catalogue Service. Steve Donegan

Steve Ansari *, Stephen Del Greco, Neal Lott NOAA National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina 2. DATA

Leveraging OGC Services in ArcGIS Server

HYSPLIT model description and operational set up for benchmark case study

Leveraging OGC Services in ArcGIS Server. Satish Sankaran, Esri Yingqi Tang, Esri

The European Commission s science and knowledge service. Joint Research Centre

Introduction to SDIs (Spatial Data Infrastructure)

Version 3 Updated: 10 March Distributed Oceanographic Match-up Service (DOMS) User Interface Design

Heterogeneous Missions Accessibility: Interoperability for Earth Observation

XIOS and I/O Where are we?

The Common Framework for Earth Observation Data. US Group on Earth Observations Data Management Working Group

You will create some icons yourself, but some are supplied for you. If you are at ECMWF then you can copy the icons from the command line like this:

Observation feedback archiving in MARS. Acknowledgement:

TSMAD: Transfer Standard Maintenance & Applications Development WG Julia Powell Vice Chair

Open Geospatial Consortium

Making data access easier with OPeNDAP. James Gallapher (OPeNDAP TM ) Duan Beckett (BoM) Kate Snow (NCI) Robert Davy (CSIRO) Adrian Burton (ARDC)

Standards, GML and AIXM. Dr. David Burggraf Vice President Galdos Systems Inc

Global Earth Observation System of Systems. GEO Secretariat Geneva, Switzerland

Transcription:

WCS2.1 Met-Ocean 16 th Workshop on Operational Systems Crown copyright Met Office

A Revolutionary Approach to Multi- Dimensional Data Access of Gridded Datasets Using Current and Proposed OGC Web Coverage Standards 16 th Workshop on Operational Systems ECMWF Reading 2 nd March, 2017 Peter Trevelyan UK Met Office (UKMO) Paul Hershberg and Steve Olson National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Weather Service (NWS) Crown copyright Met Office

Table Of Contents Background Issues with Coverages Paradigm Shift in thinking about Coverages The MetOcean App Profile: Adding Functionality to WCS Core Key Benefits of MetOcean Application Profile -- 1) Coverage Collection -- 2) New Structural Patterns -- 3) Describe Coverages as an Observational Type -- Effect of 2D coverages versus 4D, a GFS model case study -- 4) New Data Extraction Patterns Current Status/Results -- Demo of a MetOcean Application Profile Implementation Future Plans Questions Backup Slides Crown copyright Met Office

Background: Coverages Phenomena that vary over geospatial domains Defined by Domain and Range Radar Vertical Profiles Time Series Wind Profiles Radiosondes Satellite Data NWP model output

Background: OGC Web Coverage Service (WCS) Gridded Data Publish as a service with OGC Standards Request & Response API s WCS GetCapabilities DescribeCoverage GetCoverage GRIB2, NetCDF, etc

So What s the problems? Data Size, Volume, Resolution insufficient storage, computer resources, bandwidth Transfer of MetOcean data sets harder to push thru web services Subsetting Returns only data necessary to consumer WCS Core Functionality: Trimming, Slicing, but lacking Not tailored to specific MetOcean community s needs. Interoperability Improvement between disparate web services. Needed for global cooperation Can we describe MetOcean WCS data in a community-based controlled vocabulary? MultiDimensionality MetOcean data inherently 4D (x/y/z/t) WCS Coverages often 2D Size, # WCS Requests & Responses w/ 2D Coverages unwieldy Need new way of thinking about MetOcean (x/y)

Paradigm Shift in thinking about Coverages Allows consumers ability to singularly extract 4D/5D/+ data over geography, time, altitude, & ensembles, + Coverages: Stack 2D One 4D WCS2.1 Core allows 2D 4D Reduces # of Cov s Reduces # of WCS Transactions! Depict whole atmosphere as a multidimensional simulation Coverages!= Temp, Wspd, etc Sample atmosphere as 1 4D object Access Higher Dimensions (5D +)

Service Extensions Processing Range Subsetting Interpolation Scaling CRS WCS Core Functionality Application Profiles Earth Observation

The main problem with the description of geospatial data is that is product based For example the names of layers are usually as follows:- Height_200hPa_T+24_GFS_2015-05-15T03:30:00Z Need to be data centric This is not geospatial and each layer is explicitly requested by name/ Think of the atmosphere as a multi-dimensional cube. The number of dimensions is not limited, but normally x,y,z,t with the addition of ensemble. This hyper cube has properties e.g. temperature, wind, humidity, max wind level etc. The requests are then truly geo-spatial and only refer to the converge identifier, not a product name!they query the cube in terms of its dimensions and properties.

WCS 2.0 Core GetCoverage Operation Slice Operation (Dimension Reduction) Trim Operation (Extent Reduction) Courtesy Jozef Matula IBL

Start with an example: Source coverage data is potentially N dimensional just like variables in NetCDF. Can have X, Y, Z (vertical level), Time. Slice operation reduces dimensions e.g. from 3D to 2D. Sounds promising for vertical profile extraction. Trim operation implements dimension range filtering, if typically applied to both X and Y. Sounds promising for geospatial data BBOX extraction. Slice and Trim can be requested in other coordinate reference systems (CRS) than the CRS of the source data (re-projection) Courtesy Jozef Matula IBL

Meteorological Data Extraction Patterns Z X Imagine 3D data cube without time Courtesy Jozef Matula IBL

Meteorological Data Extraction Patterns Extracting data for a point = Slice X, Slice Y, Slice Z Courtesy Jozef Matula IBL

Meteorological Data Extraction Patterns Extracting vertical profile data for a point = Slice X, Slice Y With vertical range = Slice X, Slice Y, Trim Z Courtesy Jozef Matula IBL

Meteorological Data Extraction Patterns Extracting data for 2D geospatial domain for a single vertical level = Trim X, Trim Y, Slice Z Courtesy Jozef Matula IBL

Met-Ocean Data Extraction. All mentioned patterns were purely geospatial and height related. Is the time is just yet another 4th dimension? We need to take into account: Forecast validity time. Model run reference time. Ensemble member dimension. This potentially creates a 6D coverage?! Not to be forgotten too - sampling and interpolation. Crown copyright Met Office

Meteorological Data Extraction Patterns Extracting vertical profile data for 2D geospatial domain = Trim X, Trim Y, Trim Z Courtesy Jozef Matula IBL

Meteorological Data Extraction Patterns T(0) T(0.3) T(0.6) T(1) Extracting data for a trajectory (for example road) = Trim in Trajectory CRS + Slice in Z. Trajectory CRS is 1 dimensional function T(q) for q in <0;1> mapping q to actual X, Y coordinates! Courtesy Jozef Matula IBL

Meteorological Data Extraction Patterns Extracting vertical profile data for a trajectory = Trim in Trajectory CRS

Meteorological Data Extraction Patterns T(0) T(0.3) T(0.6) T(1) Extracting data for a 3D trajectory (airplane) flight) = Trim in 3D Trajectory CRS 3D Trajectory CRS is 1 dimensional function T(q) for q in <0;1> mapping q to real X,Y,Z coordinates. Courtesy Jozef Matula IBL

MetOcean Profile s Benefits to the WCS Core to Address new MetOcean Coverages

Coverage Collection Provide a very powerful way of grouping MetOcean Coverages. A NWP model run is in fact a coverage collection NWP Model Simulations Radar Mosaics Climate Observations A single, uniquely identified resource consisting of member coverages related by common geospatial properties. Treated as a single geospatial object Address multidimensionality by further REDUCING the number of individual coverages, relevant to the GetCapbilites response. Attribute Common Metadata to entire collection, not each member coverage. New MetOcean operation DescribeCoverageCollection Returns member coverages with a simple API

New Data Structural Patterns (GetCapabilities Response document) Groups Provides a hierarchical way of nesting services. Supports Service End Points, allowing for a Fully Distributed System Collections Return Info on Collections only, not individual member Coverages Organizes & reduces amt of service metadata returned in GetCapabilities Response!! Increases Efficiency of Web Services!!

(cont)

Describing a MetOcean Coverage as an Observational Type Current Obs -> Models -> Wx, Ocean, Climate Forecast Simulations Simulations have properties describing characteristics of models Define coverage metadata as a specialized O&M type (ISO 19156). Benefits of using O&M Uses common Weather/Oceanic Vertical Reference Systems. Supports Links for references. Initial release supports WMO GRIB2 tables and concepts, but may be expanded. The metadata is not tied to a specific data format i.e. GRIB2. By linking to WMO registers (e.g. http://codes.wmo.int/grib2/codeflag/4.5), there is support for a controlled vocabulary, facilitating interoperability and extensibility. A mechanism for Quality Control using a Data Mask (See Backup Slide #25) Denotes at which forecast projection data is valid for. A method to enumerate non-regular axes to support time and vertical dimensions. Key in 2D 4D. (See Backup Slide #24) Organizes metadata in a more common sense manner in a DescribeCoverage Response!!

Effect of 4D coverages versus 2D coverages on web services: the GFS model, a case study User to extract GFS Model (one run time, e.g 06Z) 2D: ~ 10,000 individual coverages 4D: ~ 6 individual coverages Effect on GetCapabilities Response Doc (that lists the coverages) 2D: ~ 30,000 lines of XML! 4D: ~ 200 lines of XML! Effect on GetCoverage Request Number 2D: User makes 10,000 Requests 4D: User makes only 6 Requests Massive Reduction in Amt of data Returned! Massive Reduction in Amt of data Requests! Bottom line is MetOcean supports WCS operations that support multidimensionality with 4D Coverages (x,y,z,t).

New Operations to Query MetOcean Data Complex Data Extraction Derived/Developed from Multi Dimensionality and 4D Coverage Tailored to common MetOcean Data Shapes More Explicit than WCS GetCoverage operation GetPolygon Area or Volume GetCorridor

Current Status And Results: A Demo A web service implementation featuring the full MetOcean Profile has been built & tested using UK Met & US NWS data! The MetOcean Application Profile is still in need of comment! Links to the MetOcean Profile on the OGC website: https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=70345&version=1 https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=70347&version=1

MetOcean Demonstration To highlight the key MetOcean features the profile has extended over WCS 2.1 Core, a transcontinental flight demo will be shown that can request/receive info from a single proxy service. This proxy setup shows how multiple WCS servers can be accessed as separate component requests. Over UK airspace, proxy retrieves info from UK server Over US airspace, proxy retrieves info from US server May be beneficial as an aviation/marine DST (NextGen/SESAR)

MetOcean Demonstration (cont) London s Heathrow Airport to Denver Colorado s Airport. Show extraction of WAFS data along the flight Show a single user request to the proxy service Using single identifier Access data from a 4D hyper cube (lat, lon, time, and vertical coord) Proxy Service requests data from 2 disparate WCS servers Each WCS request accesses a hemisphere cut out of global data The Flight Planning Client retrieves from the proxy server a stitched grid (merged product) Proxy server has a virtual copy of the re-constituted data cube. Merged Product is then used to construct the corridor data Copyright 2016 Open Geospatial Consortium

MetOcean Demonstration (cont) Not all use cases will be demonstrated due to time, but shown will be a live demo of these Requests: GetCapabilites (http://wssandbox.iblsoft.com/wafc/kwbc?service=wcs&version=2.1.0&request=g etcapabilities) DescribeCoverageCollection (http://wssandbox.iblsoft.com/wafc/kwbc?service=wcs&version=2.1.0&request=d escribecoveragecollection&coveragecollectionid=kwbc_2017-03- 01T06.00.00Z) DescribeCoverage (http://ws-sandboxie.iblsoft.com/wafc/kwbc?service=wcs&version=2.1.0&request=describe Coverage&COVERAGEID=KWBC_2017-03-01T06.00.00Z_ISBL) NOTE: make sure datetime is valid/current in above URL s

Demo Link: http://ws-sandbox.iblsoft.com/demo2/

Future Plans Multi slicing and trimming with a single GetCoverage operation. Allows extraction of Multi pts/cross sections from one GetCoverage operation. Standardize MetOcean CRS, vertical levels, etc. Based on the WMO standards. Add formal extension for GetCorridor & GetPolygon Investigate adding a pub/sub model for offering subscription service. Explore adding data formats with metadata. Explore encoding coverages in JSON (CovJSON) in addition to XML. Add support for 5D ensemble members. Incorporate MetOcean DWG requests/comments.

Questions?

Backup Slides:

GetCapabilities GML GetCapabilities-Exrension «DataType» MetOcean::Cov eragesummary «DataType» w cs:extension + wcs:coverageid :NCName + cis:envelope :cis:axisextent + ows:metadata :ows::abstractmetadata +coveragesummary 0..* 0..* «DataType» Cov eragecollectionmetadata + metocean:name :string [0..1] + metocean:serviceinstant :anyuri [0..1] + ows:metadata :ows:abstractmetadata [0..1] last +coveragecollectionsummary 0..* «DataType» cov coll:cov eragecollectionsummary «DataType» MetOcean::Group +group 0..* + covcoll:coveragecollectionid :NCName + cis:envelope :cis:axisextent + ows:metadata :ows:abstractmetadata last 0..1 «DataType» SimulationCollection +simulationcollection 0..* «DataType» DescribeableCoverageCollection + cis:envelope :cis:axisextent [0..1] +simulationmember 1..* «DataType» metocean:simulationmember +simulationcoveragesummary 0..* «DataType» SimulationCov eragesummary «XSDchoice» AdditionalMetadata + covcoll:referencetime :gml:timeposition + :referencetimeaxis :cis:regularaxis + referencetimeaxis :cis:irregularaxis «DataType» ow s:abstractmetadata

L Model for CIS 1.1 llows Derivation of one 4D coverage -> many 2D verages) class CIS::AbstractGridCov erage (as per grid-regular) (for reference only) CIS::AbstractCoverage «Feature T ype» CIS::AbstractGridCov erage «Feature T ype» CIS::GeneralGridCov erage «Feature T ype» CIS::GridCov erage + envelope :GML::Envelope «Feature T ype» CIS::RectifiedGridCov erage + envelope :GML::Envelope +domainset «Data Type» CIS::GeneralGrid + srsname :anyuri + axislabels :string [1..*] + srsdimension :positiveinteger + griddimension :positiveinteger +domainset «Data Type» GML::Grid +domainset «Data Type» GML::RectifiedGrid deprecated

Quality Control using a Data Mask

2D Coverages, a Case Study (Note: choose Presentation mode for scroll bar availability <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <wcs:capabilities updatesequence="20120504t160000z" version="2.0.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:gco="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gco" xmlns:gmd="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd" xmlns:gts="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gts" xmlns:gsr="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gsr" xmlns:gss="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gss" xmlns:metocean="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/metoceanprofile/1.0" xmlns:wcs="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/2.1" xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/xmlschema-instance" xmlns:covcoll="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/covcoll/1.0" xmlns:cis="http://www.opengis.net/cis/1.1" xmlns:crs="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/service-extension/crs/1.0" xsi:schemalocation="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/metoceanprofile/1.0 file:/c:/users/ptrevelyan/wcs/metoceanwcs/metoceanprofile/schemas/wcsmetoceanprofileal L.xsd"> <ows:serviceidentification> <ows:title>test configuration of Met data server</ows:title> <ows:abstract> Copyright (C) The Met Office - UK </ows:abstract> <ows:keywords> <ows:keyword>mo-wcs</ows:keyword> <ows:keyword>wcs MO-AP</ows:Keyword> <ows:keyword>wcs 2.1</ows:Keyword> <ows:keyword>wcs</ows:keyword> <ows:keyword>meteorological Products</ows:Keyword> <ows:keyword>hydrological Products</ows:Keyword> <ows:keyword>land Surface Products</ows:Keyword>

4D Coverages, a Case Study (Note: choose Presentation mode for scroll bar availability <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <wcs:capabilities updatesequence="20120504t160000z" version="2.0.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:gco="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gco" xmlns:gmd="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd" xmlns:gts="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gts" xmlns:gsr="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gsr" xmlns:gss="http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gss" xmlns:metocean="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/metoceanprofile/1.0" xmlns:wcs="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/2.1" xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/xmlschema-instance" xmlns:covcoll="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/covcoll/1.0" xmlns:cis="http://www.opengis.net/cis/1.1" xmlns:crs="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/service-extension/crs/1.0" xsi:schemalocation="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/metoceanprofile/1.0 file:/c:/users/ptrevelyan/wcs/metoceanwcs/metoceanprofile/schemas/wcsmetoceanprofile ALL.xsd"> <ows:serviceidentification> <ows:title>test configuration of Met data server</ows:title> <ows:abstract> Copyright (C) The Met Office - UK </ows:abstract> <ows:keywords> <ows:keyword>mo-wcs</ows:keyword> <ows:keyword>wcs MO-AP</ows:Keyword> <ows:keyword>wcs 2.1</ows:Keyword> <ows:keyword>wcs</ows:keyword> <ows:keyword>meteorological Products</ows:Keyword> <ows:keyword>hydrological Products</ows:Keyword> <ows:keyword>land Surface Products</ows:Keyword>