Back Projection of the Okhotsk earthquake on the vertical plane. To test the candidate geometry of a vertical fault, we perform the BP analysis on the

Similar documents
5.3 Southern Xinjiang event

An imaging technique for subsurface faults using Teleseismic-Wave Records II Improvement in the detectability of subsurface faults

Hanging-Wall and Directivity Effects on the Near-Fault Ground Motions

Transactions, SMiRT-22 San Francisco, California, August 18-23, 2013 Division 5

3D Horizon/Fault Interpretation Exercise Using Seismic Micro-Technology s PC based 2d/3dPAK Seismic Interpretation Software

Chapter 5. 3D data examples REALISTICALLY COMPLEX SYNTHETIC INVERSION. Modeling generation and survey design

fraction of Nyquist

Uploading Data for TPV8 and TPV9 February 6, 2007

Background on Kingdom Suite for the Imperial Barrel Competition 3D Horizon/Fault Interpretation Parts 1 & 2 - Fault Interpretation and Correlation

EXTRACTION OF SPATIO-TEMPORAL SLIP VELOCITY FUNCTION OF EARTHQUAKE FROM THE EXISTING SOURCE INVERSION MODEL

Limitations of Rayleigh Dispersion Curve Obtained from Simulated Ambient Vibrations

DIRECTIVITY CENTERING OF GMPES AND OF DIRECTIVITY MODELS

Gravity Gradients in PreStack Depth Migration

Time in ms. Chan. Summary

Uploading Data for TPV5 October 4, 2007

Plane Wave Imaging Using Phased Array Arno Volker 1

Application of 3D source deghosting and designature to deep-water ocean bottom node data Xu Li*, Jing Yang, Hui Chen, Melanie Vu, and Ping Wang (CGG)

Two-Dimensional Waves

SUMMARY NOISE REDUCTION BY SPATIAL SLOPE ESTIMATION

Qualitative Depth Estimation by Differencing Upward Continuations

Supplementary Materials for

Least-squares Wave-Equation Migration for Broadband Imaging

Work Plan for Scenario Earthquake Simulations (SEQ.1)

MEASURING SURFACE CURRENTS USING IR CAMERAS. Background. Optical Current Meter 06/10/2010. J.Paul Rinehimer ESS522

2D Inversions of 3D Marine CSEM Data Hung-Wen Tseng*, Lucy MacGregor, and Rolf V. Ackermann, Rock Solid Images, Inc.

GG450 4/5/2010. Today s material comes from p and in the text book. Please read and understand all of this material!

A Avenue, Bus: (604) Delta BC V4C 3W2 CANADA Memorandum

Processing converted-wave data in the tau-p domain: rotation toward the source and moveout correction

Pre Stack Migration Aperture An Overview

QUICK FORECASTING OF TSUNAMI IN BALI AND NUSA TENGGARA REGIONS, BASED ON THE TSUNAMI DATABASE SYSTEM

REMI and SPAC: A Comparison

1D internal multiple prediction in a multidimensional world: errors and recommendations

We N Converted-phase Seismic Imaging - Amplitudebalancing Source-independent Imaging Conditions

Considerations in 3D depth-specific P-S survey design

Reverse time migration of multiples: Applications and challenges

SeisComP3 - Tutorial

Spherical Geometry Selection Used for Error Evaluation

Directions in 3-D imaging - Strike, dip, both?

CfE Higher Physics. Particles and Waves

Improved Imaging through Pre-stack Trace Interpolation for missing offsets of OBC data A case study from North Tapti area of West Coast, India

What is the Advantage of Seismic Array Processing?

Particles and Waves Final Revision Exam Questions Part 2

G012 Scattered Ground-roll Attenuation for 2D Land Data Using Seismic Interferometry

Summary. Introduction

Stanford Exploration Project, Report 124, April 4, 2006, pages 49 66

Examples of GLOBE Claritas Processing

Daniel R.H. O Connell, Ph.D. Geophysicist. Fugro Consultants, Inc. 25 March Diablo Canyon SSHAC SSC Working Meeting March 2014

Seismic Reflection Method

Robustness of the scalar elastic imaging condition for converted waves

Downloaded 10/23/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at where P.

Short Note. DMO velocity analysis with Jacubowicz s dip-decomposition method. David Kessler and Wai-Kin Chan*

Coherent partial stacking by offset continuation of 2-D prestack data

MODULATING A POLYCHROMATIC IMAGE BY A 2 ND IMAGE PLOTTED AGAINST SATURATION AND A 3 RD IMAGE PLOTTED AGAINST LIGHTNESS: PROGRAM hlsplot

SeisVolE Teaching Modules Preliminary, Draft Instructions (L. Braile and S. Braile, 5/28/01,

Workhorse ADCP Multi- Directional Wave Gauge Primer

CFP migration; practical aspects

Principles and Techniques of VSP Data Processing

DS-0322 Tracking Analysis Software Operation manual Basic Operation procedure for Constant-ratio Tracking Analysis

Part 1: Calculating amplitude spectra and seismic wavelets

Determining satellite rotation rates for unresolved targets using temporal variations in spectral signatures

We Survey Design and Modeling Framework for Towed Multimeasurement Seismic Streamer Data

Petrel TIPS&TRICKS from SCM

Deconvolution in the radial trace domain

AP Physics Problems -- Waves and Light

This is called the vertex form of the quadratic equation. To graph the equation

Inverse Continuous Wavelet Transform Deconvolution Summary ICWT deconvolution Introduction

Geology 554 3D Horizon/Fault Interpretation Labs 1 & 2 - Fault Interpretation and Correlation

Anatomy of common scatterpoint (CSP) gathers formed during equivalent offset prestack migration (EOM)

FAULT SLIP. GG303 Lab 13 11/29/16 1

Electromagnetic migration of marine CSEM data in areas with rough bathymetry Michael S. Zhdanov and Martin Čuma*, University of Utah

MEASUREMENT OF THE WAVELENGTH WITH APPLICATION OF A DIFFRACTION GRATING AND A SPECTROMETER

REPORT ON A 3D INDUCED POLARISATION SURVEY OVER THE HOMEEP AND SHIRLEY TRENDS, CONCORDIA DISTRICT, NORTHERN CAPE

Adaptive Waveform Inversion: Theory Mike Warner*, Imperial College London, and Lluís Guasch, Sub Salt Solutions Limited

SEG/San Antonio 2007 Annual Meeting

Subsalt steep dip imaging study with 3D acoustic modeling Lei Zhuo* and Chu-Ong Ting, CGGVeritas

A simple program for attenuation of source-generated linear noise in 3D seismic data

Refraction Full-waveform Inversion in a Shallow Water Environment

Surface wave retrieval from ambient noise using multi-dimensional deconvolution

SUPPLEMENTARY FILE S1: 3D AIRWAY TUBE RECONSTRUCTION AND CELL-BASED MECHANICAL MODEL. RELATED TO FIGURE 1, FIGURE 7, AND STAR METHODS.

Supporting Online Material for

Chapter 10. Exploring Conic Sections

Angle, symmetry and transformation

Sensor Tasking and Control

Geogiga Seismic Pro 9.0 Release Notes

GUIDE TO VIEW3D. Introduction to View3D

MODIFICATIONS FOR 3-D

Determination of the aperture of the LHCb VELO RF foil

3D GROUND MOTION SIMULATION IN BASINS

Downloaded 09/03/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Offset plane waves vs. common-azimuth migration for sub-salt imaging

Main Menu. Summary: Introduction:

CSEM data uncertainty analysis for 3D inversion Jan Petter Morten, EMGS, Astrid Kornberg Bjørke, EMGS, and Trude Støren, EMGS

Angles, Straight Lines and Symmetry

An implementable alternate survey geometry design for ideal Land 3D Seismic Acquisition

Ultrasonic Multi-Skip Tomography for Pipe Inspection

Quest for subsalt steep dips Chu-Ong Ting*, Lei Zhuo, and Zhuoquan Yuan, CGGVeritas

Fracture Quality from Integrating Time-Lapse VSP and Microseismic Data

SUMMARY ELASTIC SCALAR IMAGING CONDITION

Summary. Introduction

Model-space vs. data-space normalization for recursive depth migration

Transcription:

Supplementary information of The 213 Okhotsk Deep-Focus Earthquake: Rupture Beyond the Metastable Olivine Wedge and Thermally-Controlled Rise Time near the Edge of a Slab Back Projection of the Okhotsk earthquake on the vertical plane To test the candidate geometry of a vertical fault, we perform the BP analysis on the vertical plane with a strike of 12 degree (from GCMT). The BP result (Fig. S) is not in favor of a vertical plane since the 3 km dimension is excessively large compared with the aftershock distribution (Fig. 1). One possible concern is that the large apparent dimension is the result of the BP artifact instead of the effect of the testing geometry. We perform the BP of the M6.8 earthquake, to understand the possible BP artifact on a vertical fault plane. We find that the swimming effect only happens in the coda and moves downward (i.e. towards to the direction of the array along its average ray path). In the vertical BP of the mainshock, we do find the expected downward going artifact in the coda (after 3s). However, within the duration of the mainshock BP (first 3s), the apparent rupture dimension already exceeds 3 km and moves upward, which is clearly not a BP artifact but the biased projection due to the incorrect vertical fault geometry. We therefore rule out the vertical plane for the possible fault geometry of the mainshock. Synthetic tests of P and pp phases on horizontal, SE dipping and slab-parallel planes As outlined in the main text, we discriminate between a single horizontal plane and a slab-parallel plane by comparing the BPs of P and pp phases on the two planes. For the P

phase, we use the most reliable BP results in the band of. to 2 Hz. For the pp phase, we use the frequency band of.2 to 1 Hz due to lower coherency. The horizontal plane BP for all phases and arrays are consistent. The BPs of the P phase of the NA and EU arrays are very consistent across the whole rupture (Figure 1). The P and pp of the NA array are consistent for the SSE rupture segment (Figure 1). The pp result missed the NE rupture because the beginning of the pp data is contaminated by the coda of the direct P phase. The SE-dipping plane for all phases and arrays are inconsistent. While the BPs of the P phase of the NA array shows that the southern rupture propagates in the SE direction, the BPs of the P phase of the EU array and pp phase of the NA array show it propagating towards almost southward (Figure S2-left). The SE-dipping plane is therefore ruled out. We cannot compare the slab-parallel plane BP of all combinations of phases and arrays. Only the P phase of the NA data has sufficient resolution. The P phase of the EU array and pp phase of the NA array have take-off vectors sub-parallel to the slab interface (as defined by Slab 1.), which causes a large spatial uncertainty. The pp of the EU array is affected by the large coda of the direct P phase and has very low coherency. Alternatively, for the P phase of the NA array we can assess if the slab-parallel BP and the horizontal BP are compatible, i.e. if their spatial differences in map view are only due to the fact that BP maps a source onto the piercing point of the seismic ray (possibly extrapolated) through the assumed plane. This validation can be done through synthetic

tests: we consider the BP of a certain phase on a certain plane as an input source, generate synthetic array waveforms and back-project the synthetic data of a different phase on a different plane to get a set of output sources. We then compare this output source to the corresponding BP of the real data. Only if the input source is on the true fault plane its synthetic output sources can be consistent with all the observations. The inconsistent plane can be ruled out. The possible phase and plane combinations for the NA array are the P phase on the slab-parallel plane (P Slab), P phase on the horizontal plane (P Horizontal) and pp phase on the horizontal plane (pp Horizontal). Since the location of the southern rupture of the pp and P phases on the horizontal plane is consistent, we construct from them a single input source. We therefore have P Slab, P (pp) Horizontal as possible inputs and P Slab, P Horizontal and pp Horizontal as possible outputs. We tested the six combinations of input and output (Table S1, figure S3). The four tests using the same phases as the input and output are expected to be self-consistent (left and middle columns of Fig. S3). The critical tests that discriminate the different fault planes are those using different phases as input and output (Right column of Fig. S3).We found that the real and synthetic BP solutions are consistent except for the BP with P Slab as input and pp Horizontal as output (Top-right of Fig. S3), which yields a long SSWoriented rupture segment inconsistent with the observed short SSE rupture of pp phase of the NA array result on a horizontal plane (Figure S2-left). We also perform similar synthetic tests for the SE dipping plane (Figure S1). We find inconsistency of BP with P on SE dipping plane as input and pp Horizontal as output, which also rules out the SE dipping plane. In summary, while the horizontal plane solution is compatible with all the synthetic tests, the slab-parallel plane solution is inconsistent with the pp phase

observations. We therefore consider that the horizontal plane is the only hypothesis satisfying all our observations.

13 6 12 11 1 9 8 7 1 6 4 3 4 2 1 2 3 4 7 3 Figure S1. Selected stations (pink triangles) used for P back-projections from the North American network (NA) and European network (EU) and a coherent subset (green triangles) of NA Array stations for pp BP.

Figure S2.Inconsistency of the BPs of different phases on SE dipping plane (left) and on the slab plane (right).

6 Input:''''P'Slab''' Output:'P'Slab' 3 3 6 Input:''''P'Slab''' Output:'P'horizontal'' 3 3 6 Input:''''P'Slab''' Output:'pP'horizontal'' 3 3. 2. 2. 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 4. 4. 4. 1 1 1 4 4 4 3. 3. 3. 6 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. Input:'''P'horizontal''' Output:'P'slab'' 3 3 6 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. Input:'''P'horizontal''' Output:'P'horizontal'' 3 3 6 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. Input:''''P'horizontal''' Output:''pP'horizontal'' 3 3. 2. 2. 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 4. 4. 4. 1 1 1 4 4 4 3. 3. 3. 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. Figure S3. Synthetic tests of pp and P on a sub-horizontal and en echelon (slab-parallel) plane, for the NA array. The six panels show all combinations of the input and output rupture geometry for the synthetic tests. The circles are the recovered BP locations of the synthetics color-coded by time. The black asterisks are the input rupture models, the red squares are BP locations of the real data on the same plane as the synthetic output.variable amplitudes of 1, 1. and 1.2 are assigned to the three clusters of sources from north to south based on the observed BP power. The most useful tests that use combinations of different plane and phases in the input and output are in the right columns (red box);the circles and red squares are generally consistent in all the tests except the top-right panel.

Figure S4. Aftershocks and background seismicity in the source region. Color circles are the primary (filled) and secondary (empty) peaks of a reference BP result (P phase, NA array,.-2 Hz, single sub-horizontal plane). The asterisks are the hypocenter solutions from different agencies.the NEIC hypocenter (at a depth of 61 km) is 4 km shallower than the slab model, presumably due to uncertainties of both the hypocenter location and the slab model. We use the NEIC1 hypocenter in our main analysis. The colored small triangles are the background PDE seismicity. The large triangles with gray edges are the aftershocks also from the IDC catalog. The dashed contours are from the Slab 1. model. The seismicity and slab model are color-coded by the depth (color scale on the right, in km).

Depth (km) 3 4 6 7 8 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 9 12 13 14 1 Figure S. BP results of P phase of the NA array on a single vertical plane with a strike of 12 degree (from GCMT). The circles are the recovered BP locations color-coded by time and sized by power.

Figure S6.Spatiotemporal distribution of seismic radiation sources of the M7 class earthquakes imaged by back-projection of the direct P phase recordings of the North America network. The color circles indicate the locations of the BP peaks with their size scaled by beamforming power and their color indicating timing relative to the hypocentral time (color bar on the right).the red asterisks denote the hypocenters. The black curves are contours of the Slab 1. model with a depth interval of 2 km. The top panel shows the M7.3 earthquake processed in the frequency band of 1-2 Hz with a sliding window length of 3s and time increment of. s. The bottom panel shows the M7.7 earthquake processed in the band of.-2 Hz with window length of s and time increment of 1s.

Figure S7.Results of 3Djoint BP of the direct P phase and depth phasepprecorded by the NA network shown in map-view (left) and N-S cross-section (right). Individual BP is first performed for each phase in 3D, i.e. without assuming a fault surface. The log of the MUSIC pseudo- spectra are then added to obtain the joint BP image. The color circles indicate the locations of the BP peaks, with size scaled by beamforming power and color indicating timing relative to the hypocentral time (color bar on the right). The red asterisks denote the hypocenter. The blue curves are contours of the Slab 1. model with a depth interval of 2 km. The joint BP result is dominated by the direct P phase, modulated by the trade off along the ray path in the NE-SW direction. The pp phase has a minor contribution due to smaller signal to noise ratio. The spatiotemporal distribution of the joint 3D BP results in map-view is grossly consistent with that of the BP on the single sub-horizontal plane. In the cross-section view, the SSE rupture is 3 km deeper than NE rupture.

Figure S8. Rupture speed estimation based on the BP results of NA.-2 Hz. (Left) HF radiators groupedin(1) northern and (2) southern clusters (gray ellipses). (Right) HF radiators as a function ofrupture time and distance along the major axis of the grey ellipses. Rupture speed is estimated for individual clusters. For the southern rupture the estimate accounts for an apparent ~1 s delay of the rupture onset (assuming it starts from the same hypocenter as the northern rupture). The average rupture speeds for the northern and southern segments are3.4 km/s and 4. km/s, respectively.

P'at''s' pp'at''s' P'and'pP'at''s' P'at'1's' pp'at'1's' P'and'pP'at'1's' P'at'2's' pp'at'2's' P'and'pP'at'2's' Figure S9.Snapshots of the 3D BP. The three columns show the BP images of P, pp and joint phases at s, 1 s, 2 s relative to the origin time. The dark red surfaces show the -1 db (P and Joint) and - db (pp) isosurface of the MUSIC pseudo-spectrum (with maximum at db). The color contours on the side of the boxes are the 2d cross-sections of the 3d images. The red dot is the location of the maxima. The black dot is the hypocenter. The black contour lines indicate the slab 1. model. These snapshots show elongated array response function along the ray-path direction. The P and pp phases contribute to uneven resolutions. In particular, the pp phase has a lower resolution than the P phase because only a subset of coherent stations of the USArray can be used for the pp phase. Therefore, the joint BP is dominated by the P phase with trade-off along its ray path.

6 Input:''''P'SE'dipping''' Output:'P'SE'dipping' 3 3 6 Input:''''P'SE'dipping'' Output:'P'horizontal'' 3 3 6 Input:''''P'SE'dipping''' Output:'pP'horizontal'' 3 3. 2. 2. 2 4. 2 1 4. 2 1 4. 2 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 3. 6 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. Input:'''P'horizontal''' Output:'P'SE'dipping'' 3 3 3. 6 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. Input:'''P'horizontal''' Output:'P'horizontal'' 3 3 3. 6 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. Input:''''P'horizontal''' Output:''pP'horizontal'' 3 3. 2. 2. 2 4. 2 1 4. 2 1 4. 2 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 3. 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. 3. 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. 3. 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. Figure S1. Synthetic tests of pp and P on a sub-horizontal and SE dipping plane, for the NA array. The six panels show all combinations of the input and output rupture geometry for the synthetic tests. The circles are the recovered BP locations of the synthetics color-coded by time. The black asterisks are the input rupture models; the red squares are BP locations of the real data on the same plane as the synthetic output.variable amplitudes of 1, 1. and 1.2 are assigned for the three clusters of input sources from north to south based on the observed BP power. The most useful tests that use combinations of different plane and phases in the input and output are in the right columns (red box);the circles and red squares are generally consistent in all the tests except the top-right panel.

3 1 9 4 8 7 6 Depth (km) 6 4 7 3 8 2 1 9 11. 12 12. 13 13. 14 14. 1 Figure S11. BP results of M6.8 aftershock of P phase of the NA array on a single vertical plane with a strike of 12 degree (from GCMT). The circles are the recovered BP locations color-coded by time and sized by power.

Input\Output P Slab P Horizontal pp Horizontal P Slab Expected Expected Unexpected P/pP Horizontal Expected Expected Expected Table S1. Summary of the synthetic tests of all possible combinations of planes and phases. The test is marked as Expected if the spatial pattern of the output BP source is consistent with that of the BP of the corresponding real data, Unexpected otherwise.