The Human Touch: Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device

Similar documents
FDA Initiatives on Human Factors and Usability for Medical Devices Molly Follette Story, PhD FDA /CDRH / ODE

HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN

March 20, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

Applying Human Factors to Medical Device Design

LNE/G-MED North America, Inc

Medical Device Usability

Docket No. FDA-2017-D-0154: Considerations in Demonstrating Interchangeability with a Reference Product

April 28, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

!"# $ # # $ $ % $ &% $ '"# $ ()&*&)+(( )+(( )

Human Factors Usability in the Review of New Medical Devices FDA/CDRH. Considering Usability for Pharmaceutical Aerosol Devices.

FDA CDRH perspective on new technologies in inhaler products

Acceptance Checklist for Special 510(k)

Standards: Implementation, Certification and Testing Work group Friday, May 8, :00 Pm-1:30 Pm ET.

Center for Devices and Radiological Health Premarket Approval Application Critical to Quality

2018. All rights reserved.

Product Development for Medical, Life Sciences, and Consumer Health

THINK THE FDA DOESN T CARE ABOUT USER EXPERIENCE FOR MOBILE MEDICAL APPLICATIONS? THINK AGAIN.

Below we ve highlighted several of the key points from the final guidance document.

IEC/TR : (E)

POSTMARKET MANAGEMENT OF CYBERSECURITY IN MEDICAL DEVICES FINAL GUIDANCE MARCH 29, TH ANNUAL MEDICAL DEVICE QUALITY CONGRESS

R Delegation of Powers and Duties to the Executive Secretary. R Application for Certification.

Use of Standards and Conformity Assessment in U.S. Regulation: Perspective of the Private Sector

SECURETexas Health Information Privacy & Security Certification Program

The National Medical Device Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (MD-ISAO) Initiative Session 2, February 19, 2017 Moderator: Suzanne

FINAL Design Control Inspectional Strategy Revised February, 1998 All Previous Editions Are Obsolete Effective through May 31, 1998

Design Considerations and Premarket. Recommendations for Interoperable Medical Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

FDA & Medical Device Cybersecurity

DATA SELECTION AND APPRAISAL CHECKLIST University of Reading Research Data Archive

Recent Developments in FDA s Review of Proprietary Names for Drugs

Standard Development Timeline

Regulatory Aspects of Digital Healthcare Solutions

Design of Case Report Forms. Case Report Form. Purpose. ..CRF Official clinical data-recording document or tool used in a clinical study

In addition, below we offer our responses to the questions posed in the Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of the Draft Guidance:

ILM Whistle-blowing Policy for Centres, Providers and Candidates

CIP Cyber Security Personnel & Training

ELECTRONIC SITE DELEGATION LOG (esdl) USER MANUAL

April 21, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

External Assessment Specifications Document Curriculum. NQF Qualification Title Code

Navigating Regulatory Issues for Medical Device Software

Medical Device Cybersecurity: FDA Perspective

What is Usability? What is the Current State? Role and Activities of NIST in Usability Reactions from Stakeholders What s Next?

ABB Limited. Table of Content. Executive Summary

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office SOP 1027 LU

An Update on the Activities and Progress of the mhealth Regulatory Coalition Prepared for the 2011 Medical Device Connectivity Conference

21 CFR PART 11 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS)

Medical Device Vulnerability Management

A Homeopath Registered Homeopath

Copyright 2018 by Boston Scientific, Inc.. Permission granted to INCOSE to publish and use. #hwgsec

MEASURES TO ENHANCE MARITIME SECURITY. Cyber risk management in Safety Management Systems. Submitted by United States, ICS and BIMCO SUMMARY

Contents. Researcher Guidance for Reportable Events & Notifying the IRB. Office of Research Integrity & Compliance Version 2 Updated: June 23, 2017

GUIDE 63. Guide to the development and inclusion of safety aspects in International Standards for medical devices

Process Safety Management Training

Confined Space Entry (CSE) Certification Training Standard

NYS Early Learning Trainer Credential. Portfolio Instructions

CIP Standards Development Overview

Your Guide to the FDA Annual Report

MEDICAL DEVICE CYBERSECURITY: FDA APPROACH

ISO / IEC 27001:2005. A brief introduction. Dimitris Petropoulos Managing Director ENCODE Middle East September 2006

DOWNLOAD OR READ : USABILITY TESTING OF MEDICAL DEVICES PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Strategic & Operational Planning:

Tool Qualification Plan for Testwell CTC++

Traffic Control Person Certification Training Standard

POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF SURVEILLANCE AND EPIDEMIOLOGY. Procedures for Handling Requests for Proprietary Name Review.

Privacy Statement for Use of the Certification Service of Swisscom (sales name: "All-in Signing Service")

Consideration of Cybersecurity vs Safety Risk Management

Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No dated 02 February 1998 DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY

DOD Medical Device Cybersecurity Considerations

HIPAA Your Privacy Rights

Cyber Risk and Networked Medical Devices

3/3/2017. Medical device security The transition from patient privacy to patient safety. Scott Erven. Who i am. What we ll be covering today

I. The Medical Technology Industry s Cybersecurity Efforts and Requirements

Medical device security The transition from patient privacy to patient safety

AUDITOR / LEAD AUDITOR PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL DEVICE INDUSTRY

EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE

A. Introduction 1. Title: 2. Number: 3. Purpose: 4. Applicability: 4.1. Functional Entities: Balancing Authority Distribution Provider

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments

4.2.2 Usability. 4 Medical software from the idea to the finished product. Figure 4.3 Verification/validation of the usability, SW = software

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Security techniques Information security risk management

CIP Cyber Security Personnel & Training

HAGA CLICK AQUÍ PARA TRADUCCION AL ESPAÑOL DE LA POLÍTICA DE PRIVACIDAD

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board

AAPM Standard of Practice: CT Protocol Review Physicist

1. STRATEGIC PLANNING

Proceed With Caution. BJHS 9 th Grade E-Cybermission Project

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Unique Device Identification (UDI) Status, Learnings, Next Steps

TaiHao Medical Inc. Chiu S. Lin, Ph.D. President Lin & Associates, LLC 5614 Johnson Avenue BETHESDA MD 20817

How To Evaluate Health Information on the Internet: Questions and Answers. Key Points

Electronic Records Management the role of TNA. Richard Blake Head of the Records Management Advisory Service

Unique Device Identification (UDI) Updates on US Activities

APPROVAL SHEET PROCEDURE INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATION. PT. TÜV NORD Indonesia PS - TNI 001 Rev.05

APACMed Workshop Update on UDI Implementation & ASPAC Regional Trend. Victoria Qu Sept. 22 nd, 2017

QP Current Practices, Challenges and Mysteries. Caitriona Lenagh 16 March 2012

Abu Dhabi Certification Scheme for Beauty Salon Sector

Fall Protection Certification Training Standard

MARPA DOCUMENT MARPA Revision 1.1

Data Subject Access Request Form (GDPR)

Conference for Food Protection. Standards for Accreditation of Food Protection Manager Certification Programs. Frequently Asked Questions

Data Integrity: Technical controls that demonstrate trust

Medical Device Innovations: Welcome to the Future

Transcription:

The Human Touch: Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story, PhD 27 September 2017 Photo credits:

Why should we care about being patient-centric? The FDA tells us: Our drugs must be safe and efficacious; Our drug delivery devices must be safe and effective; And we must present the evidence in our regulatory submissions. Is that the only reason we should care? The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 2

Why should we care about being patient-centric? The drug is great! The delivery device is great! The user? If users can t use the product well, none of that matters! The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 3

What happens if users can t use the product well? More customer complaints Bigger customer support burden More use errors Higher risk of harm and recalls More patient abandonment / lower compliance rates Less repeat business Fewer prescriptions Lower sales

What government regulation requires HF data? 21 CFR 820.30, Design Controls (a) General (b) Design & development planning (c) Design input (d) Design output (e) Design review (f) Design verification (g) Design validation. Design validation shall ensure that devices conform to defined user needs and intended uses. (g) (f) (c) The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 5 (d) (e) Source: FDA/CDRH Design Control Guidance (1997), Figure 1

What guidance has FDA published on human factors? Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices (CDRH, 2016) This guidance recommends that manufacturers follow human factors or usability engineering processes during the development of new medical devices, focusing specifically on the user interface. The goal is to ensure that the device user interface has been designed such that use errors that occur during use of the device that could cause harm or degrade medical treatment are either eliminated or reduced to the extent possible. The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 6

What guidance has FDA published on human factors? Define intended uses, use environments, user interface Identify use-related hazards Identify and categorize critical tasks Develop & implement risk mitigation/control measures Validate use safety and effectiveness NO Use-related risks acceptable? YES New use-related risks introduced? NO Document HFE/UE process YES Source: FDA/CDRH HF Guidance (2016), Figure 3 The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 7

What international standards define HF for devices? IEC 62366-1:2015 (+ IEC TR 6366-2:2016), Medical devices Application of usability engineering to medical devices This international standard describes a usability engineering process to provide acceptable risk related to usability of a medical device. This international standard strictly focuses on applying the usability engineering process to optimize medical device usability as it relates to safety. The companion technical report (IEC 62366-2) is comprehensive and has a broader focus. It focuses not only on usability as it relates to safety, but also on how usability relates to attributes such as task accuracy, completeness and efficiency, and user satisfaction. The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 8

What international standards define HF for devices? IEC 62366-1:2015 (+ IEC TR 6366-2:2016), Medical devices Application of usability engineering to medical devices Strong focus on safety Removal of terms and concepts: Application specification, Frequently Used Functions, acceptance criteria Retention of terms: Primary Operating Functions, abnormal use Addition of terms and concepts: Use Specification, Hazard-Related Use Scenario, UOUP Introduction of term and method of Formative Evaluation Addition of companion Technical Report (IEC TR 62366-2:2016) Provides much more guidance about how to meet the standard but also how best to utilize a variety of human factors methods The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 9

What international standards define HF for devices? 5 USABILITY ENGINEERING PROCESS 5.1 Prepare USE SPECIFICATION 5.2 Identify USER INTERFACE characteristics related to SAFETY and potential USE ERRORS 5.3 Identify known or foreseeable HAZARDS and HAZARDOUS SITUATIONS 5.4 Identify and describe HAZARD-RELATED USE SCENARIOS 5.5 Select the HAZARD-RELATED USE SCENARIOS for SUMMATIVE EVALUATION 5.6 Establish USER INTERFACE SPECIFICATION 5.7 Establish USER INTERFACE EVALUATION plan Source: IEC 62366-1:2015 5.8 Perform USER INTERFACE design, implementation and FORMATIVE EVALUATION 5.9 Perform SUMMATIVE EVALUATION of the USABILITY of the USER INTERFACE 5.10 USER INTERFACE OF UNKNOWN PROVENANCE The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 10

How much human factors testing is required? Generative Human Factors Evaluations Timing: While the product is still being defined Goal: Understand the users experiences and unmet needs Freedom: Any aspect of the product can be changed $ Formative Human Factors Evaluations Timing: While the medical device user interface is being refined Goal: Develop the right product Freedom: Some aspects of the device can be changed Summative Human Factors Evaluation, $$$$$ a.k.a. Human Factors Validation Testing Timing: After product development is believed to be completed Goal: Ensure that the product will be safe and effective in use Freedom: Usually only the labeling can be changed $$ The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 11

So who are the users? And who do we test? Health care providers Specialty Experience and training Patients Adults, elders, children Disease effects Experience level Test Participants Match the intended users Minimum of 15 per user group Use environments The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 12

So how do we assess use-related risks? Task analysis Based on use scenarios Use error analysis Conduct risk assessment: consequences, severity, risk control Simulated-use testing Drug = placebo or mimic Skin = injection pad Critical tasks of use The device can be used safely. Essential tasks of use The device can be used effectively. The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 13

How can we ensure FDA will accept our methods? It s very simple: Ask them!!! In advance! For example: Request a pre-meeting (e.g. Type C) Discuss regulatory pathway, ask specific questions Submit the protocol for the human factors validation study Ask for approval of methods and approach Submit the (draft) instructions for use Ask for feedback on wording, illustrations, layout The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 14

Is that sufficient? FDA approved products! Effectiveness Safety Safe and effective products! Safe products! The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 15

Why might we want to do more? Safe, effective and usable products that customers prefer and love to use! Emotion Preference Usability Safe, effective and usable products that customers prefer! Safe, effective and usable products! Effectiveness Safety The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 16

Why should we care about being patient-centric? The drug is great! The delivery device is great! The user? If users can use the product well, your product will be much more likely to be safe and effective for the patients and other users and to be commercially successful. The Human Touch - Develop a Patient-Centric Injection Device Molly Story - 27 September 2017 17

Thank You