Mapping Project Report Table of Contents

Similar documents
Phone: Fax: Table of Contents

Phone: (603) Fax: (603) Table of Contents

1. LiDAR System Description and Specifications

Up to 4 range measurements per pulse, including last 4 Intensity readings with 12-bit dynamic range for each measurement

Simulating Dynamic Hydrological Processes in Archaeological Contexts Mapping Project Report

HAWAII KAUAI Survey Report. LIDAR System Description and Specifications

Yosemite National Park LiDAR Mapping Project Report

Quantifying the Geomorphic and Sedimentological Responses to Dam Removal. Mapping Project Report

Title: Understanding Hyporheic Zone Extent and Exchange in a Coastal New Hampshire Stream Using Heat as A Tracer

Mapping Project Report Table of Contents

Studies. Reno, NV USA

Up to 4 range measurements per pulse, including last 4 Intensity readings with 12-bit dynamic range for each measurement

William E. Dietrich Professor 313 McCone Phone Fax (fax)

LiDAR & Orthophoto Data Report

Northern California Fault System LiDAR Survey. (March 21 April 17, 2007) Processing Report

LiDAR Remote Sensing Data Collection: Yaquina and Elk Creek Watershed, Leaf-On Acquisition

Project Report Nooksack South Fork Lummi Indian Nation. Report Presented to:

Lewis County Public Works Department (County) GIS Mapping Division 350 N. Market Blvd. Chehalis, WA Phone: Fax:

W D-0049/004 EN

Lidar Technical Report

Project Report Lower Columbia River. Report Presented to:

Performance Evaluation of Optech's ALTM 3100: Study on Geo-Referencing Accuracy

Project Report Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe. Report Presented to:

AIRBORNE LIDAR TASK ORDER REPORT SHELBY COUNTY TN 1M NPS LIDAR/FEATURE EXTRACT TASK ORDER UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (USGS)

Project Report Snohomish County Floodplains LiDAR Survey. Report Presented to:

Third Rock from the Sun

LiDAR Technical Report NE Washington LiDAR Production 2017

Quinnipiac Post Flight Aerial Acquisition Report

Terrestrial GPS setup Fundamentals of Airborne LiDAR Systems, Collection and Calibration. JAMIE YOUNG Senior Manager LiDAR Solutions

Central Coast LIDAR Project, 2011 Delivery 1 QC Analysis LIDAR QC Report February 17 th, 2012

LiDAR REMOTE SENSING DATA COLLECTION BISCUIT FIRE STUDY AREA, OREGON

LiDAR Remote Sensing Data Collection: Salmon River Study Area, Oregon

Windstorm Simulation & Modeling Project

Introduction to Lidar Technology and Data Collection

MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA COASTAL MAPPING

OLC Wasco County: Delivery One.

LIDAR REMOTE SENSING DATA COLLECTION: DOGAMI, CAMP CREEK PROJECT AREA

Rogue River LIDAR Project, 2012 Delivery 1 QC Analysis LIDAR QC Report September 6 th, 2012

Sandy River, OR Bathymetric Lidar Project, 2012 Delivery QC Analysis Lidar QC Report March 26 th, 2013

Aerial and Mobile LiDAR Data Fusion

IP3 LiDAR collaborative research data report

An Introduction to Lidar & Forestry May 2013

WADDENZEE SPRING SURVEY

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)

Airborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR

Orthophotography and LiDAR Terrain Data Collection Rogue River, Oregon Final Report

LiDAR sensor and system capabilities and issues

PSLC King County LiDAR

2010 LiDAR Project. GIS User Group Meeting June 30, 2010

Reality Check: Processing LiDAR Data. A story of data, more data and some more data

Table of Contents. 1. Overview... 1

PSLC King County LiDAR. July 18, Technical Data Report.

Burns, OR LIDAR Project, 2011 Delivery QC Analysis LIDAR QC Report February 13th, 2012

ALS40 Airborne Laser Scanner

Leica - Airborne Digital Sensors (ADS80, ALS60) Update / News in the context of Remote Sensing applications

LiDAR data pre-processing for Ghanaian forests biomass estimation. Arbonaut, REDD+ Unit, Joensuu, Finland

Airborne Laser Survey Systems: Technology and Applications

3-d rendering of LiDAR points with RGB color assigned from ortho-photos, view of Lostine River looking south

APPLANIX PRODUCTS AND SOLUTIONS FOR MOBILE MAPPING AND POSITIONING CAPTURE EVERYTHING. POSPac MMS HYDRO 08 November 2008

BLM Fire Project, 2013 QC Analysis Lidar and Orthophoto QC Report November 25th, 2013

PSLC King County Delivery 1 LiDAR

2017 OLC Silver Creek

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1. Overview Acquisition... 2

High resolution survey and orthophoto project of the Dosso-Gaya region in the Republic of Niger. by Tim Leary, Woolpert Inc.

Coeur d Alene Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium

LIDAR an Introduction and Overview

SPAR, ELMF 2013, Amsterdam. Laser Scanning on the UK Highways Agency Network. Hamish Grierson Blom Uk

Whittier, Alaska LiDAR

Saddle Mountain LiDAR. March 25, Technical Data Report.

The Applanix Approach to GPS/INS Integration

Digital Elevation Models

Course Outline (1) #6 Data Acquisition for Built Environment. Fumio YAMAZAKI

PSLC Walla Walla, Washington LiDAR

Terrain Modeling and Mapping for Telecom Network Installation Using Scanning Technology. Maziana Muhamad

About LIDAR Data. What Are LIDAR Data? How LIDAR Data Are Collected

N.J.P.L.S. An Introduction to LiDAR Concepts and Applications

Leica ALS70. Airborne Laser Scanners Performance for diverse Applications

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Radiohead House of Cards

High Resolution Laserscanning, not only for 3D-City Models

GeoEarthScope NoCAL San Andreas System LiDAR pre computed DEM tutorial

ICC experiences on Inertial / GPS sensor orientation. A. Baron, W.Kornus, J.Talaya Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya, ICC

Nooksack River Basin LiDAR

CALIBRATION PROCEDURES OF THE IMAGING LASER ALTIMETER AND DATA PROCESSING

Municipal Projects in Cambridge Using a LiDAR Dataset. NEURISA Day 2012 Sturbridge, MA

Mapping Photoperiod as a Variable in Vegetation Distribution Analysis. Photoperiod is defined as the duration of time for which an organism receives

Automating Data Alignment from Multiple Collects Author: David Janssen Optech Incorporated,Senior Technical Engineer

DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL USING LASER SCANNING IN THE NEAPOLITAN VOLCANIC AREA. DAUR - University of Padua (2) DISTART - University of Bologna (3)

ENY-C2005 Geoinformation in Environmental Modeling Lecture 4b: Laser scanning

2017 OLC Siskiyou. September 27,

LIDAR Workshop IPSRS Commission 1

RIEGL LMS-Q780. The Versatile, High Altitude Airborne LIDAR Sensor

Key-Words: Surveying Engineering, Laser scanning airborne systems

SENSOR FUSION: GENERATING 3D BY COMBINING AIRBORNE AND TRIPOD- MOUNTED LIDAR DATA

Sensor Fusion: Generating 3D by Combining Airborne and Tripod mounted LIDAR Data

Airborne LiDAR Data Acquisition for Forestry Applications. Mischa Hey WSI (Corvallis, OR)

Mayden VP of Business Development Surdex Corporation

New Features in TerraScan. Arttu Soininen Software developer Terrasolid Ltd

Application of GPS/INS-Systems with the HRSC A Comparison of APPLANIX POS/AV-510 and IGI AEROcontrol-IId. F. Scholten*, S. Sujew**, K.

Absolute Horizontal Accuracies of Pictometry s Individual Orthogonal Frame Imagery

Terrain categorization using LIDAR and multi-spectral data

Transcription:

LiDAR Estimation of Forest Leaf Structure, Terrain, and Hydrophysiology Airborne Mapping Project Report Principal Investigator: Katherine Windfeldt University of Minnesota-Twin cities 115 Green Hall 1530 Cleveland Ave N. St. Paul, MN 55108 Email: kwindfeldt@gmail.com Phone: 612-624-3400 Fax: 612-625-5212 Mapping Project Report Table of Contents 1. LIDAR System Description and Specifications... 1 2. Survey Area.... 2 3. Survey Planning and Parameters.... 4 4. LIDAR and GPS Data Collection Campaign.... 5 5. Data Processing... 5 6 File Formats... 11 1. LIDAR System Description and Specifications This survey was performed with an Optech GEMINI Airborne Laser Terrain Mapper (ALTM) serial number 06SEN195 mounted in a twin-engine Cessna Skymaster (Tail Number N337P). The instrument nominal specifications are listed in table 1. Operating Altitude 150-4000 m, Nominal Horizontal Accuracy 1/5,500 x altitude (m AGL); 1 sigma Elevation Accuracy 5-30 cm; 1 sigma Range Capture Up to 4 range measurements, including 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd, last returns Intensity Capture 12-bit dynamic range for all recorded returns, including last returns Scan FOV 0-50 degrees; Programmable in increments of ±1degree Scan Frequency 0 70 Hz Scanner Product Up to Scan angle x Scan frequency = 1000 Roll Compensation ±5 degrees at full FOV more under reduced FOV Pulse Rate Frequency 33-167 khz Position Orientation System Applanix POS/AV 510 OEM includes embedded BD950 12- channel 10Hz GPS receiver Laser Wavelength/Class 1047 nanometers / Class IV (FDA 21 CFR) Beam Divergence nominal ( full angle) Dual Divergence 0.25 mrad (1/e) or 0.80 mrad (1/e) Table 1 Optech GEMINI specifications See http://www.optech.ca for more information from the manufacturer. NCALM Mapping Project Report 1

2. Survey Area. The survey area was a rectangle, 6.25Km by 6.7Km (41.8 Km 2 area), located 15Km south of Franklin, NC. The location is shown below: Figure 1(a) Shape and location of survey polygon and Control GPS stations (TopoUSA) NCALM Mapping Project Report 2

Figure 2(b) Shape and location of survey polygon (Google Earth) NCALM Mapping Project Report 3

3. Survey Planning and Parameters. The survey composed of a 36 total passes going in North-South direction Figure 2 below shows the planning software along with the sets of planned flight lines and the survey parameters. Figure 3 Flight lines from the planning software Survey parameters are given below in Table 3. Survey Parameters Survey Totals Altitude (m) 600 Total Length (Km) 222 Swath Width (m) 400 Swath Area (Km 2 ) 43 Overlap (%) 59 Area of Interest (Km 2 ) 41 Laser PRF (khz) 100 No. of Passes 36 Scan Freq (Hz) 45 Scan Angle (degrees) 21 Scan Cutoff (degrees) 3 Table 3 Survey parameters NCALM Mapping Project Report 4

4. LIDAR and GPS Data Collection Campaign. This survey was flown as a part of Seed Money Survey Campaign that took place in Aug-Sept 2009. This section was surveyed on Aug 26, 09( Day of the Year 238) and was flown out of Macon County airport in Franklin, North Carolina. The total flight time was 4 hrs 52mins and the total Laser on time was 1 hrs 26 min. Two GPS reference stations were used for ground control. One was a CORS (Continuously operated Reference system) station and the other one was set up and operated by NCALM. GPS observations were logged at 1 Hz. Ground equipment at NCALM reference station consisted of ASHTECH (Thales Navigation) Z-Extreme receivers, with a choke ring antenna (Part# 700936.D) mounted on 1.3-meter fixed-height tripods. The list of the station and their locations is given below in table 4. The airborne receiver is an integrated GPS receiver module Trimble BD950, logging at 10 Hz. Station Name Lat Long Station Type MACN 35.2219-83.4206 NCALM FRKN 35.1918-83.3949 CORS Table 4 Ground Control Stations 5. Data Processing The following diagram (Figure 2) shows a general overview of the NCALM LiDAR data processing workflow Figure 3 NCALM LiDAR Processing Workflow NCALM Mapping Project Report 5

5.1. GPS & INS Navigation Solution. Reference coordinates and the GPS data for the CORS stations was obtained from their website. Reference coordinates for the NCALM station was obtained using OPUS (Online Positioning User Service), which processes static differential baselines tied to the international CORS network. For further information on OPUS see http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/opus/ and for more information on the CORS network see http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cors/ Airplane GPS trajectories for this survey were processed using KARS (Kinematic and Rapid Static), software created by Dr. Gerry Mader. KARS kinematic GPS processing uses the dual-frequency phase history files of the reference and airborne receivers to determine a high-accuracy fixed integer ionosphere-free differential solution at 1 Hz. GPS trajectories are created using all the above four mentioned ground control stations. These trajectories are then differenced to determine the best solutions. Figure 3 shows the plot for positional difference between trajectories obtained from MACN and FRCN. Positional Difference in the Aircraft Trajectory 0.2 0.15 0.1 Positional Difference (meters) 0.05 0 1 950 1899 2848 3797 4746 5695 6644 7593 8542 9491 10440 11389 12338 13287 14236 15185 16134 17083-0.05 East North Up -0.1-0.15-0.2 Time (Seconds) Figure 3 Positional differences between the two trajectories After GPS processing, the 1Hz differential GPS trajectory and the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data are processed together in the POSProc software (version 5.2). POSproc software combines GPS trajectory with the orientation information in a Kalman Filter to produce a final, smoothed and NCALM Mapping Project Report 6

complete navigation solution at 200Hz. This final solution is known as the SBET (Smoothed Best Estimated Trajectory). 5.2 Laser Point Processing An SBET together with laser ranges and mirror angles are finally combined in Optech s DashMap software (Version 4.1) to generate a flight-strip point cloud in LAS format. All point cloud coordinates were processed with respect to NAD83 and referenced to the international CORS network. The projection is UTM Zone 17, with units in meters. Heights are NAVD88 orthometric heights computed using the NGS GEOID 03. Scan angle cut-offs are done to improve the overall DEM accuracy as points farthest from the scan nadir are the most affected by small errors in pitch, roll and scanner mirror angle measurements. Moreover, scan angle cut-offs are done to eliminate points at the edge of the scan lines for improving the overall DEM accuracy as the points farthest from the scan nadir are the most affected by small errors in pitch, roll and scanner mirror angle measurements. A scan cutoff angle of 3 degrees was used. NCALM Mapping Project Report 7

5.3 Classification and Filtering Classification done by automated means using TerraSolid Software. More information about the software can be found at http://www.terrasolid.fi/en/products/4 Figure 4a Unfiltered DEM NCALM Mapping Project Report 8

Figure 4b Filtered DEM NCALM Mapping Project Report 9

5.4 Gridding and Tiling. The flight strip point cloud files were tiled into 1 kilometer square blocks, illustrated in the figure below Figure 5 - Tile footprints overlaid on bare-earth shaded relief image. Tiles follow a naming convention using the lower left coordinate (minimum X, Y) as follows: XXXXXX_YYYYYYY. For example if the tile bounds coordinate values from easting equals 274000 NCALM Mapping Project Report 10

through 275000, and northing equals 3878000 through 3879000 then the tile is named as 275000_3878000. The project totaled 90 tiles. Digital Elevation Models were produced in SURFER (Golden Software) Version 8 at 1.0 meter resolution using krigging routine. 6 File Formats The point cloud files are delivered in the 1000mX1000m tiles in.las format. It is a binary format contains all the information associated with each point i.e. its position in X,Y,Z, intensity, flight line, timestamp, scan angle etc. The individual Las files can be converted to ASCII using the LAS to ASCII converter tool developed by the UNC. It can be accessed at http://www.cs.unc.edu/~isenburg/lastools. It gives users the freedom to create ASCII files with whichever point features they want to access. Raster grids are delivered in ArcInfo grid and hillshade format as 10KM mosaics. Incase of sections smaller than that in size, a single ArcInfo grid and hillshade file is delivered. The point tiles, the corresponding grids and mosaics are all positioned in the NAD83 reference frame and projected into UTM coordinates Zone 17N. The elevations are NAVD88 orthometric heights computed using the NGS GEOID 03. All units are in meters. NCALM Mapping Project Report 11