Multicomponent wide-azimuth seismic data for defining fractured reservoirs

Similar documents
cv R z design. In this paper, we discuss three of these new methods developed in the last five years.

EarthStudy 360. Full-Azimuth Angle Domain Imaging and Analysis

We LHR5 06 Multi-dimensional Seismic Data Decomposition for Improved Diffraction Imaging and High Resolution Interpretation

Design of Surface Seismic Programs for CO2 Storage Monitoring. WesternGeco North America Geophysics Manager Houston

Estimating interval shear-wave splitting from multicomponent virtual shear check shots

We N Fracture and Stress from in Situ, Full-azimuth Seismic Data - Application to a Kuwait Oil Field Dataset

Processing converted-wave data in the tau-p domain: rotation toward the source and moveout correction

Azimuthal Anisotropy Investigations for P and S Waves: A Physical Modelling Experiment

We Survey Design and Modeling Framework for Towed Multimeasurement Seismic Streamer Data

Fracture Quality from Integrating Time-Lapse VSP and Microseismic Data

Reflection seismic Method - 3D

HTI anisotropy in heterogeneous elastic model and homogeneous equivalent model

2011 SEG SEG San Antonio 2011 Annual Meeting 3938

Three critical concerns for marine seismics with portable systems. Source strength and tuning Streamer length 2D vs. 3D

C009 Wide Azimuth 3D 4C OBC A Key Breakthrough to Lead to the Development of Hild Field

Summary. Introduction

Y015 Complementary Data-driven Methods for Interbed Demultiple of Land Data

Numerical modeling of shear-wave splitting and azimuthal velocity analysis in fractured media

PSPRO AZIMUTHAL. Big Data Software for Interactive Analysis and Interpretation of Full-Azimuth Seismic Gathers. Power to Decide

NORSAR-3D. Predict and Understand Seismic. Exploring the Earth. Find the answers with NORSAR-3D seismic ray-modelling

Flexi Binning : A Solution for Irregular Acquisition Geometry

Obstacles in the analysis of azimuth information from prestack seismic data Anat Canning* and Alex Malkin, Paradigm.

3-D vertical cable processing using EOM

Robustness of the scalar elastic imaging condition for converted waves

Borehole Seismic Services Data processing, imaging and dedicated expertise

AVO for one- and two-fracture set models

Tu A11 01 Seismic Re-processing and Q-FWI Model Building to Optimise AVO and Resolution in the Shallow Wisting Discovery

A Short Narrative on the Scope of Work Involved in Data Conditioning and Seismic Reservoir Characterization

Full Azimuth Seismic Acquisition with Coil Shooting

Th LHR5 08 Multi-modal Surface Wave Inversion and Application to North Sea OBN Data

VISTA. Desktop seismic data processing software

Improved Imaging through Pre-stack Trace Interpolation for missing offsets of OBC data A case study from North Tapti area of West Coast, India

GeoDepth. Velocity Determination, Modeling and Imaging

GG450 4/5/2010. Today s material comes from p and in the text book. Please read and understand all of this material!

M. Warner* (S-Cube), T. Nangoo (S-Cube), A. Umpleby (S-Cube), N. Shah (S-Cube), G. Yao (S-Cube)

C-Wave processing of 3D seismic data of Cambay Basin-A case study

We N Depth Domain Inversion Case Study in Complex Subsalt Area

Anisotropic 3D Amplitude Variation with Azimuth (AVAZ) Methods to Detect Fracture-Prone Zones in Tight Gas Resource Plays*

Multi-Azimuth PSDM Processing in the Presence of Orthorhombic Anisotropy -- A Case History Offshore North West Australia Summary

P071 Land Data Regularization and Interpolation Using Azimuth Moveout (AMO)

Multi-Dimensional Seismic Data Decomposition for Improved Diffraction Imaging and High Resolution Interpretation

Elastic physical seismic modeling Don C. Lawton,ScottP. Cheadle, EricV. Gallantand MalcolmB. Bertram

Seismic Data Preconditioning for Improved Reservoir Characterization (Inversion and Fracture Analysis)

Summary. Introduction

Seismic Modeling, Migration and Velocity Inversion

2010 SEG SEG Denver 2010 Annual Meeting

Cross-validation of 3C and 9C prestack shear wave splitting analysis at Big Sky

ABOUT GEOSEISMOS BACKGROUND AND HISTORY CLIENTS (BY GEOPROCESADOS)

CLASSIFICATION OF MULTIPLES

Tu-P05-05 Multi-azimuth Anisotropic Tomography and PreSDM of a North Sea Streamer Survey

We ELI1 02 Evaluating Ocean-bottom Seismic Acquisition in the North Sea - A Phased Survey Design Case Study

Efficient Beam Velocity Model Building with Tomography Designed to Accept 3d Residuals Aligning Depth Offset Gathers

Azimuthal binning for improved fracture delineation Gabriel Perez*, Kurt J. Marfurt and Susan Nissen

L 5 Seismic Method. Courtesy of ExxonMobil. Mitchum et al., 1977b

Downloaded 10/23/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at where P.

DELINEATION OF TIGHT GAS SANDS BY 3D-3C VSP

Elastic full waveform Inversion for land walkaway VSP data

This article describes a statistical methodology to estimate

Minimizing Fracture Characterization Uncertainties Using Full Azimuth Imaging in Local Angle Domain

Main Menu. Summary. Survey Design

We Solutions for Scattered Surface-wave Attenuation in the Western Desert of Egypt

Mitigation of the 3D Cross-line Acquisition Footprint Using Separated Wavefield Imaging of Dual-sensor Streamer Seismic

Seismic Data Acquisition COPYRIGHT. Introduction

Dip or Strike? Complementing geophysical sampling requirements and acquisition efficiency

Common Reflection Angle Migration (CRAM) for improved input to reservoir description an example from Mumbai High Field

UNDERSTANDING FRACTURE ORIENTATION BY REMOVING POLARIZATION DISTORTION FOR DIRECT SHEAR WAVES. Terence Campbell

DUG HAS EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE WITH COMPLEX DEPTH IMAGING PROJECTS FROM ALL MAJOR OIL AND GAS PRECINCTS

Summary. Offset Vector Tiling for CBM

SeisSpace Software. SeisSpace enables the processor to be able focus on the science instead of being a glorified data manager.

Tu LHR5 02 Sparse Nodes and Shallow Water - PS Imaging Challenges on the Alwyn North Field

Azimuth Moveout (AMO) for data regularization and interpolation. Application to shallow resource plays in Western Canada

Inversion after depth imaging

Fracture characterization through the use of azimuthally sectored attribute volumes

Maximizing the value of the existing seismic data in Awali field Bahrain, by utilizing advanced 3D processing technology.

Tu N Maximising the Value of Seismic Data for Continued Mature Field Development in the East Shetland Basin

m=[a,b,c,d] T together with the a posteriori covariance

P312 Advantages and Disadvantages of Surface and Downhole Seismic Illustrated by Processing Results of 3D VSP and 3D+VSP

Subsalt steep dip imaging study with 3D acoustic modeling Lei Zhuo* and Chu-Ong Ting, CGGVeritas

Modeling in Seismic. Tesseral Geo Modeling. Capability to compute 2D-2C and 3D- 3C gathers Enables Geo-scientists to make:

C014 Shot Based Pre-Processing Solutions for a WATS Survey An Example from a Field Trial in Green Canyon Gulf of Mexico

Successes and challenges in 3D interpolation and deghosting of single-component marinestreamer

y Input k y2 k y1 Introduction

W015 Full-waveform Seismic Inversion at Reservoir Depths

TomoXPro. Crosshole Survey Design, Modeling, Data Processing, Tomography, and Migration

Acquisition of high shot density blended seismic data: a WAZ sea trial Thomas Mensch*, Damien Grenié, Risto Siliqi and Yunfeng Li.

P. Bilsby (WesternGeco), D.F. Halliday* (Schlumberger Cambridge Research) & L.R. West (WesternGeco)

SUMMARY ELASTIC SCALAR IMAGING CONDITION

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF SURFACE AND DOWNHOLE SEISMIC ILLUSTRATED BY PROCESSING RESULTS OF 3D VSP AND 3D+VSP

3D S wave statics from direct VSP arrivals Michael J. O'Brien, Allied Geophysics, and Paritosh Singh, Colorado School of Mines

Progress Report on: Interferometric Interpolation of 3D SSP Data

G042 Subsalt Imaging Challenges - A Deepwater Imaging Analysis

Planning Land 3-D Seismic Surveys

Which curvature is right for you? Part - 1

G034 Improvements in 4D Seismic Processing - Foinaven 4 Years On

SEG Houston 2009 International Exposition and Annual Meeting. paper are the work of TGS-Nopec on a subset of the Freedom WAZ data.

is decomposed into P and S components localized in both space and slowness where P

Project overview. SleipnerCO 2 plume. Filip Neele, Rob Arts. E T

Anatomy of common scatterpoint (CSP) gathers formed during equivalent offset prestack migration (EOM)

Fractured Reservoir Characterization using Azimuthal AVO

Summary. Introduction. Multiple Attenuation

Transcription:

Multicomponent wide-azimuth seismic data for defining fractured reservoirs Evaluating and exploiting azimuthal anisotropy Data Processing Figure 1 A typical surface outcrop showing aligned fractures Figure 2 Drilling deviated or horizontal wells perpendicular (a) or parallel (b) to fractures Tight rock reservoirs such as limestone often produce more from secondary fracture porosity than from primary porosity. Consequently, mapping fracture density and direction is important not only to identify sweet spots, but also to optimize production. Because of in-situ stress within fields, most fractures are aligned and often close to vertical, rendering a reservoir azimuthally anisotropic (Figure 2). However, azimuthal anisotropy is captured in recorded seismic data, which exhibits similar azimuthal variations. WesternGeco has many technologies in seismic acquisition and processing that can assist the explorationist in detecting, quantifying, and compensating for azimuthal anisotropy.

90 45 135 0 180 0 180 315 225 270 Amplitude -16000 16000 Figure 3 Narrow-azimuth P-amplitude maps provide no azimuthal information. The amplitudes are the same at 0 (left) and 180 (right). Data courtesy of Eni Agip divsion Amplitude -16000 16000 Figure 4 Wide-azimuth P-amplitude maps showing azimuthal variations due to seismic anisotropy Data courtesy of Eni Agip division In narrow-azimuth marine seismic surveys such as those acquired by towed streamers, there is little azimuthal information. Because of reciprocity, the amplitude is the same every 180 (Figure 3). However, data acquired using ocean-bottom cables for a marine multicomponent (4C) survey produce a wideazimuth data set that can be split into a number of azimuth-limited cubes. This is because the shooting vessel often traverses perpendicularly to the recording cables, (almost all land 3D surveys are shot in this way). As illustrated in Figure 4, clear azimuthal variations can even be observed on a set of P-amplitude maps for different azimuth groups. In azimuthally anisotropic rocks, the initial shear wave splits into two (Figure 5). A faster-speed wave polarizes along the fractures, and a slower-speed wave moves perpendicularly to the fractures. This information is used extensively when analyzing seismic data for azimuthal anisotropy and can provide information about fracture density (fracture porosity) and orientation (directions of preferred permeability). Figure 5 Azimuthal variation in seismic velocity and shear-wave splitting

a. Supergather analysis - radial (left) and transverse (right) horizontal components c. 2C x 2C convertedwave Alford rotation analysis b. Common-offset ring analysis Direction Magnitude Figure 6 Quantifying azimuthal anisotropy WesternGeco has developed a number of methods (supergather analysis, common-offset ring analysis, and 2C x 2C converted-wave Alford rotation analysis) to analyze azimuthal anisotropy. The methods are illustrated in Figure 6. These options allow the analysis to be performed with the required level of lateral resolution to capture all the details of the subsurface anisotropy.

Supergather analysis displays the radial and transverse horizontal components of the data. In Figure 6a, clear bands of low amplitude are observed on the transverse component corresponding to the fast and slow directions. Common-offset ring analysis also utilizes the variation in the transverse component with azimuth and is applied prestack. Figure 6b shows the analysis at five different locations on two different layers. Traces are gathered together in common-offset rings, then a stack of all data for all azimuths and limited offsets with different trial directions for the fast shear direction is generated for each offset and trial direction. The stacked values are displayed as a function of azimuth and offset. Radial lines with high stack values highlight the fast and slow directions. The 2C x 2C converted-wave Alford rotation is generally used poststack. The left image in Figure 6c shows the data before rotation to pure fast and slow directions, while the right image shows the data after rotation. There are four panels in each of the two displays; the middle two are mixed fast and slow directions that we aim to minimize. Interpretation of these analyses delivers a detailed lateral image of the anisotropy magnitude and direction variations. Starting from the shallowest layer and working downwards by layer stripping, the anisotropy levels are determined independently. Figure 7 Fracture characterization at depth derived from marine 4C data Data courtesy of Eni Agip division Example results Example final results of a full layer-based azimuthal anisotropy analysis are shown in Figure 7. The anisotropy for a deep horizon is analyzed by direction in the left display and by magnitude in the right display. This process identifies rapid changes in anisotropy.

In Figure 8, the fracture information data derived from a 3-component land seismic survey is mapped. The display shows color-coded anisotropy magnitude, with the direction shown by the lines. The overlaid interpreted fault pattern clearly indicates anisotropy consistent with the fault blocks. Figure 8 Top reservoir fracture mapping from 3-component US land data

Well - 3 Well - 7d Well - 3 Well - 7d Well - 4 Well - 4 Figure 9 High azimuthal anisotropy in separate compartments Data courtesy of Eni Agip division Figure 9 shows the type of benefit that fracture mapping with wide-azimuth 4C seismic data can provide. The green areas represent high levels of anisotropy. The interpretation indicated a high-fracture-density zone to the west of Well-4. With the faulting overlaid in the right image, we can see that this zone is in a different compartment from the producing wells, as indicated by the white circles. It is, therefore, probably not in communication with the producing wells and offers potential for future drilling. New development at WesternGeco - Analysis method to detect tilted fractures Kink in SSE direction indicates fractures dipping in that direction Symmetrical shape indicates vertical fractures Kink in NNW direction indicates fractures dipping in that direction WG0473P London: +44 1293 55 6655 Houston: +1 713 789 9600 Dubai: +971 4 306 7777 www.westerngeco.com A Schlumberger/Baker Hughes company