TOWER SERVERS: DATABASE PRICE-PERFORMANCE

Similar documents
DATABASE SERVERS: CONSOLIDATION VIA VIRTUALIZATION

iscsi STORAGE ARRAYS: AND DATABASE PERFORMANCE

data center rack space of the nine Dell PowerEdge R710 solution) PowerEdge 2850 solutions. (See Figures Intel Xeon Processor 3.

MARCH 2009 Virtualized OLTP performance and power consumption test on multiprocessor Intel- and AMD-based servers

INCREASING DENSITY AND SIMPLIFYING SETUP WITH INTEL PROCESSOR-POWERED DELL POWEREDGE FX2 ARCHITECTURE

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST SUMMARY DELL REFERENCE CONFIGURATIONS: SCALABLE PERFORMANCE AND SIMPLICITY IN SETUP AUGUST 2012

VIRTUALIZATION PERFORMANCE: VMWARE VSPHERE 5 VS. RED HAT ENTERPRISE VIRTUALIZATION 3

A Principled Technologies deployment guide commissioned by QLogic Corporation

TEST REPORT JUNE 2009 Dell EqualLogic PS4000XV performance with varying user counts running a combined database, , and file server workload

MARCH 2009 TEST REPORT FEBRUARY 2006

COMPARING DESKTOP DRIVE PERFORMANCE: SEAGATE SOLID STATE HYBRID DRIVE VS. HARD DISK DRIVES AND SEAGATE CLIENT SOLID STATE DRIVE

TIME TO UPDATE FIRMWARE: DELL LIFECYCLE CONTROLLER 2 VS. HP INTELLIGENT PROVISIONING

DEPLOYING NEW DELL SOLUTIONS WITH DELL PRODEPLOY

VIRTUALIZED BACKUP ADVANTAGES OF THE DELL POWERVAULT DL BACKUP

VDI PERFORMANCE COMPARISON: DELL POWEREDGE FX2 AND FC430 SERVERS WITH VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN (ABRIDGED)

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT DELL ACTIVE SYSTEM 800 WITH DELL OPENMANAGE POWER CENTER

BENCHMARK CPU TESTING OF 13-INCH-CLASS LAPTOPS

SMB workload performance comparison: Dell TM PowerEdge TM T410 vs. HP ProLiant ML150 G6

CONSOLIDATING SQL SERVER 2008 ONTO DELL POWEREDGE R900 AND POWEREDGE R905 USING MICROSOFT S HYPER-V

BOOSTING YOUR STORAGE SERVER PERFORMANCE WITH THE INTEL XEON PROCESSOR E V2 PRODUCT FAMILY

DATABASE PERFORMANCE OF INTEL CACHE ACCELERATION SOFTWARE

A Principled Technologies deployment guide commissioned by Dell Inc.

Boost database performance in VMware vsan environments with Toshiba PX05S SAS SSDs and Dell EMC PowerEdge R740xd servers

64-bit Black-Scholes financial workload performance and power consumption on uniprocessor Intel-processor-based servers

TEST REPORT. JUNE 2007 SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Dell and HP blade servers

A Principled Technologies report commissioned by Dell

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NOVEMBER Commissioned by Dell, Inc.

TEST REPORT. SEPTEMBER 2007 Linpack performance on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 and 3 AS Intel-based servers

Cost savings of disk-based backup using a Dell PowerVault DL Backup to Disk Appliance powered by Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2 vs.

TEST REPORT SEPTEMBER 2009 SPECjbb2005 performance and price of the Dell PowerEdge R710 and HP ProLiant DL380 G6

TEST REPORT OCTOBER 2009 Real-world server consolidation: 35 HP ProLiant DL385 servers onto 5 Dell PowerEdge M610 blade servers running Hyper-V

Cost savings of disk-based backup using the Dell PowerVault DL2100 powered by Symantec Backup Exec 2010 vs. tape-based backup

10Gb iscsi Initiators

HP ELITEPAD 1000 G2 POWERED BY INTEL IN HEALTHCARE

WebBench performance on Intel- and AMD-processorbased servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux v.4.4

PERFORMANCE AND TCO: DELL POWEREDGE R820 VS. HP PROLIANT DL585 G7

AMD: WebBench Virtualization Performance Study

BLADE SERVER DATABASE PERFORMANCE: DELL POWEREDGE M420

Initial investment payback analysis: Dell PowerEdge R710 solution with VMware ESX vs. Dell PowerEdge 2850 solution

CONSOLIDATING OLDER DATABASE SERVERS ONTO DELL POWEREDGE FX2 WITH FC830 SERVERS AND FD332 STORAGE BLOCKS

WHITE PAPER February Rich clients with thin client data security: a hybrid approach

INTEL XEON PROCESSOR-BASED SERVERS AND VMWARE VSPHERE 5.0: ONE SERVER, 12 BUSINESS-CRITICAL DATABASE APPLICATIONS

MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT CONSOLIDATION AND TCO: DELL POWEREDGE R720 VS. HP PROLIANT DL380 G7

WORKSTATION HEAT AND POWER USAGE: LENOVO THINKSTATION P900 VS. DELL PRECISION T7910 WORKSTATION

DELL PREMIUM SUPPORT WITH SUPPORTASSIST TECHNOLOGY IMPROVES THE SUPPORT EXPERIENCE

CPU PERFORMANCE COMPARISON: VMWARE VCLOUD AIR, MCROSOFT AZURE, AND AMAZON WEB SERVICES

BENEFITS VIDEO BENEFITS STUDY MANAGEABILITY STUDY CONFIGURATION GUIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT

How to deploy a Microsoft Windows 10 image to an AMD processor-based laptop or desktop

RESOLVING PROBLEMS WITH DELL PROSUPPORT PLUS AND SUPPORTASSIST TECHNOLOGY

Figure 2: Dell offers significant savings per chassis over HP and IBM in acquisition costs and 1-, 3-, and 5-year TCO.

A Principled Technologies report commissioned by Dell

Dell PowerEdge R910 SQL OLTP Virtualization Study Measuring Performance and Power Improvements of New Intel Xeon E7 Processors and Low-Voltage Memory

In our testing, we used the WMLS test tool to determine the maximum number of test video streams that each storage solution could handle acceptably.

and 8 virtual machines, each one using four virtual processors and 2 GB of RAM to simultaneously execute the workload.

HP ProLiant DL585 server and HP StorageWorks EVA 4400 storage array. Dell PowerEdge R900 server and Dell EqualLogic PS5000 storage array

WORKSTATION HEAT, SOUND, AND POWER USAGE: LENOVO THINKSTATION S30 VS. HP Z420 WORKSTATION

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT. CISCO UCS DELIVERS FASTER BLADE SERVER DEPLOYMENT THAN HP c-class BLADES WITH HP VIRTUAL CONNECT

CONSOLIDATE AND UPGRADE: DELL POWEREDGE VRTX AND MICROSOFT SQL SERVER 2014

VIRTUALIZED BACKUP ADVANTAGES OF THE DELL POWERVAULT DL BACKUP TO DISK APPLIANCE POWERED BY SYMANTEC BACKUP EXEC 2010 R3

Intel Pentium Dualcore processor E2160- based server. Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X3220- based server

CISCO UCS: MEETING THE GROWING NEED FOR BANDWIDTH

FASTER AND MORE EFFICIENT FLEX SYSTEM MANAGEMENT WITH LENOVO XCLARITY ADMINISTRATOR VS. HP ONEVIEW

SAVE POWER AND SPACE BY CONSOLIDATING MULTIPLE OLDER OPENSTACK SERVERS ONTO THE NEC DX1000 MICROSERVER CHASSIS

INTEGRATION ANALYSIS AND GUIDE: LENOVO THINKSERVER TS430 IN A DELL ENVIRONMENT

$594K. Conserve spending by consolidating workloads. save up to. every year

21 TB Data Warehouse Fast Track for Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Using the PowerEdge R730xd Server Deployment Guide

DELL POWEREDGE M520 BLADE SERVER SOLUTION: ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DATABASE PERFORMANCE

NOTEBOOK COMPUTER PERFORMANCE: LENOVO THINKPAD T420 VS. THINKPAD T430

ENDPOINT MANAGEMENT WITH VMWARE HORIZON MIRAGE ABRIDGED REPORT

Save time and IT effort resolving server hardware issues with ProSupport Plus and SupportAssist

DELL POWEREDGE C4130 & INTEL XEON PHI COPROCESSOR 7120P

DELL POWEREDGE C6220 AND UBUNTU SERVER: A LAMP REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE

Dell ImageDirect time savings evaluation

TEST REPORT SEPTEMBER

TEST REPORT JANUARY 2009 Dell TM PowerEdge TM T605 with AMD Opteron TM 2384 and HP ProLiant ML370 G5 Server with Intel Xeon E5450 comparison

Competitive Power Savings with VMware Consolidation on the Dell PowerEdge 2950

TEST REPORT APRIL 2010

Handle more online transactions with non-volatile memory module based storage

Dell ImageDirect time savings evaluation

DEPLOY SERVICES FASTER WITH DELL ACTIVE SYSTEM MANAGER

FASTER AND MORE EFFICIENT SYSTEM MANAGEMENT WITH LENOVO XCLARITY ADMINISTRATOR VS. CISCO UCS MANAGER

JULY 2016 (Revised) A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT. Commissioned by Dell, Inc.

TEST REPORT OCTOBER 2009 Real-world server consolidation: 35 HP ProLiant DL385 servers onto 5 Dell PowerEdge M610 blade servers with VMware vsphere

SERVER CONSOLIDATION AND TCO: DELL POWEREDGE M620 VS. DELL POWEREDGE M610

Save hands-on IT administrator time using the Dell EMC OpenManage Essentials profile mobility feature

ROBUST FREE POWER MANAGEMENT: DELL OPENMANAGE POWER CENTER

TEST REPORT. AUGUST 2006 SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Intel Xeon 51xx processor-based servers

SERVERS: VIRTUALIZED DATABASE CONSOLIDATION ON A DELL POWEREDGE R910 SERVER USING HYPER-V. A Principled Technologies report commissioned by Dell Inc.

Consolidate your work and manage datacenter resources efficiently

TABLET COMPARISON WITH BENCHMARKS TABLETS WE TESTED A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT. SEPTEMBER 2014 (Revised) Commissioned by Intel Corp.

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT Commissioned by COMPANY by Dell Inc.

FAS Asset Accounting FAS CIP Accounting FAS Asset Inventory SQL Server Installation & Administration Guide Version

Exchange Server 2007 Performance Comparison of the Dell PowerEdge 2950 and HP Proliant DL385 G2 Servers

DELL OPENMANAGE ESSENTIALS: IMPROVE EFFICIENCY WITH FEWER TOOLS, MORE BENEFITS

TEST REPORT. MAY bit financial application-based workload performance on Intel- and AMD-processor-based server platforms.

CHOOSING THE RIGHT CHROMEBOOK FOR THE CLASSROOM

Table of contents. Introduction Installing and setting up Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64 and SQL Server 2008 x64 in this environment...

MICROSOFT LYNC SERVER CONSOLIDATION AND TCO: DELL POWEREDGE R720 VS. HP PROLIANT DL380 G7

UC for Enterprise (UCE) NEC Centralized Authentication Service (NEC CAS)

x10data Application Platform v7.1 Installation Guide

Transcription:

TOWER SERVERS: DATABASE PRICE-PERFORMANCE OUR FINDINGS To minimize data center costs and allow capacity for future growth, companies need servers that deliver both strong price-performance and a variety of expansion options. In Principled Technologies tests in our labs, the Dell PowerEdge T310 delivered 11.7 percent greater database performance per dollar than the HP ProLiant ML110 G6 server and it offered more hardware options for future growth. The Dell PowerEdge T310 lets a company spend less to achieve comparable performance today and secure greater options for tomorrow. OUR PROCESS To gauge how well each server handles database activity, we used a workload representative of many real-world database applications, DVD Store. This tool is an open-source database benchmark that simulates an online e-commerce store that sells DVDs. Both servers were running Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition with Microsoft SQL Server 2005 x64. MAY 2010 A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT Commissioned by Dell Inc.

PROJECT OVERVIEW The goal of the project was to determine which of the following systems had better database price performance as well as which server had more advanced hardware options: Dell PowerEdge T310 HP ProLiant ML110 G6 Both servers ran Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition with Microsoft SQL Server 2005 x64. We used a single client running Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 to induce a heavy database load on the server. We also compared the upgrade capabilities of the online offerings of each server in order to determine which system had superior hardware options. WORKLOAD DVD Store Version 2 (DS2) is an accessible, open-source, flexible framework with which we can model a typical online transaction processing (OLTP) database. DS2, which simulates an online e-commerce DVD store, has database components and Web server components, and includes driver programs that put heavy loads on the server. We opted to use the included driver program to stress the database layer directly, and bypassed the Web interface. When DS2 is executing, simulated customers log in; browse movies by actor, title, or category; and purchase movies. Each DS2 order consists of a customer login, a number of searches for movies, and a purchase. Each search is by title, actor, or category. The title and actor searches use full-text search. The other customer actions, including adding new customers, exercise a wide range of database functions. The main DS2 metric is orders per minute (OPM), which the driver program calculates and reports via the Windows Performance Monitor utility on the client machines. While the DVD Store client application outputs OPM at 10-second intervals visually, we chose to collect this OPM metric via the performance monitor counter on each client at 1-second intervals. We ran this workload on each server for 35 minutes, which consisted of 5 minutes of warm-up time and 30 minutes of run time. Each server under test ran a single Microsoft SQL Server 2005 x64 instance with a 5GB database that we tuned to saturate the server s processor and memory. We used the default DS2 parameters and setup configuration, with the exceptions we note in the DVD Store setup section in the How we tested section of this report. A Principled Technologies test report 2

Each client machine ran a single instance of DS2, with 24 threads, which simulate users executing actions within the application. This simulated a heavily loaded environment; the load-generating client machine ran with no think time, blasting requests as quickly as the servers could handle them. For more details on the DS2 tool, see http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/dvd+store. SYSTEM COMPARISON Figure 1 highlights some similarities and differences between the two servers. Appendix A presents detailed system information. Hardware specifications Dell PowerEdge T310 HP ProLiant ML110 G6 CPU Intel Xeon X3460 Intel Xeon X3460 CPU speed (GHz) 2.80 2.80 Number of processor packages 1 1 Number of cores per processor package 4 4 Number of hardware threads per core 2 2 Memory type PC3-10600E PC3-10600E Total memory (GB) 8 8 Maximum supported memory (GB) 32 16 Redundant power supply Available Not available Bin processor options Configurable with the Intel Xeon Processor X3470, at 2.93GHz Support only through the Intel Xeon Processor X3460, at 2.80GHz Figure 1: System configuration information for the test servers. As Figure 1 shows, the servers are very similar. The primary differences lie in the Dell PowerEdge T310 s greater potential for future expansion in the following three areas: Redundant power supply. The Dell PowerEdge T310 is available with a redundant power supply option, while the HP ProLiant ML110 G6 only offers non-redundant configurations. Redundant power supplies prevent server downtime in the event of a power supply failure. Maximum memory. The Dell PowerEdge T310 offers expansive memory configuration options supporting up to 32GB RAM, while the HP ProLiant ML110 G6 supports only 16GB RAM. Bin processor options. The Dell PowerEdge T310 is configurable with the Intel Xeon Processor X3470, at 2.93GHz, while the HP ProLiant ML110 G6 only offers up to the Intel Xeon Processor X3460, at 2.80GHz (Source: A Principled Technologies test report 3

Price as of 4/27/2010 OPM per dollar http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/middleframe.asp?page=config&productlineid=431&familyid =3093&BaseId=31701&oi=E9CED&BEID=19701&SBLID= April 30, 2010). WHAT WE FOUND As Figure 2 shows, the Dell PowerEdge T310 achieved a DVD Store Version 2 price-performance score of 22.83 OPM/dollar, an 11.7 percent greater price-performance score than the HP ProLiant ML110 G6, which achieved a priceperformance score of 20.43 OPM/dollar. To calculate the priceperformance score, we divided OPM by price. 25 20 15 10 5 0 DVD Store Version 2 price performance (Higher numbers are better) Server Dell PowerEdge T310 HP ProLiant ML110 G6 Figure 2: Normalized DVD Store Version 2 price performance results for the two servers. Higher numbers are better. Figure 3 shows the prices of the two servers on April 27, 2010. The Dell PowerEdge T310, at $4,049, cost 10.7 percent less than the HP ProLiant ML110 G6 at $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 Price comparison (Lower numbers are better) Dell PowerEdge T310 $4,481. $2,000 $1,000 HP ProLiant ML110 G6 $0 Server Figure 3: Price comparison for the two servers. Lower numbers are better. A Principled Technologies test report 4

OPM As Figure 4 shows, the DVD Store Version 2 performance of the two servers is almost identical: the Dell PowerEdge T310 achieved a DVD Store Version 2 score of 100,000 80,000 60,000 DVD Store Version 2 performance (Higher numbers are better) Dell PowerEdge T310 92,419 OPM, 1.0 percent greater than the HP ProLiant ML110 G6 s score of 91,536 OPM. 40,000 20,000 HP ProLiant ML110 G6 0 Server HOW WE TESTED Setting up the servers For each server, we configured the four internal SAS hard drives into two RAID 1 volumes, one for the operating system, and the other for the SQL Server database files. We installed a fresh copy of Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition on both servers. Installing Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition on the host server 1. Boot the server, and insert the Windows Server 2008 R2 installation DVD in the DVD-ROM drive. 2. At the Language Selection Screen, click Next. 3. Click Install Now. 4. Select Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise (Full Installation), and click Next. 5. Click the I accept the license terms check box, and click Next. 6. Click Custom. 7. Click Drive options (advanced). 8. Ensure you select the proper drive, and click New. 9. Click Apply. 10. Click Next. 11. At the User s password must be changed before logging on warning screen, click OK. 12. Type Password1 as the new password in both fields, and click the arrow to continue. 13. At the Your password has been changed screen, click OK. Setting up the network configuration on the server Figure 4: DVD Store Version 2 performance results, in OPM, for the two servers. Higher numbers are better. 1. Click StartControl PanelNetwork and InternetNetwork Connections, and double-click the Local Area Connection assigned to client/server network traffic. 2. Select Internet Protocol Version 4 (TCP/IPv4), and click Properties. A Principled Technologies test report 5

3. At the Internet Protocol Version 4 (TCP/IPv4) Properties screen, select the Use the following IP address radio button. 4. Enter a valid static IP address, subnet mask, and default gateway. 5. Click OK, and click Close to exit. Installing system updates in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 We installed the following updates on each server using the Windows Update feature: Security Update for Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Edition (KB972270) Security Update for Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Edition (KB974571) Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 8 for Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Edition (KB978207) Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool x64 - January 2010 (KB890830) Update for Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Edition (KB974431) Update for Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Edition (KB976098) Security Update for ActiveX Killbits for Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Edition (KB973525) Security Update for Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Edition (KB975467) Installing Microsoft SQL Server 2005 x64 1. Insert the installation DVD for SQL Server 2005 x64 into the DVD drive. 2. Navigate to the SQL Server 2005 x64 DVD, and double-click. Choose the appropriate edition if the installer prompts you with a menu. 3. Click the Server components link under the Install section to begin the installation. 4. At the End User License Agreement, accept the licensing terms, and click Next. 5. After installing the prerequisites, click Next. 6. At the Welcome screen, click Next. 7. At the System Configuration Check, click Next. For this installation, you may ignore the possible warning regarding IIS, as it is unnecessary for this configuration. 8. At the Registration Screen, enter the appropriate name and company. 9. At the Components to Install screen, select SQL Server Database Services and Workstation components. 10. Click Advanced. 11. Uncheck Business Intelligent Development Studio, uncheck Replication, and uncheck Books Online & Sample Databases. 12. Click Next to start the installation. 13. At the Instance Name screen, select the Default instance radio button, and click Next. 14. At the Service Account screen, select the Use the built-in System account radio button. 15. Select Local system, and click Next. 16. At the Authentication Mode screen, select Mixed Mode. 17. Specify the sa logon password by entering a password in both fields, and click Next. 18. At the Collation Settings screen, click Next. 19. Accept the default Error and Usage Report Settings, and click Next. 20. At the Ready to Install screen, click Install to begin the installation. 21. At the end of the installation in the Setup Progress screen, click Next. 22. To complete the installation, click Finish. A Principled Technologies test report 6

23. Click StartAll ProgramsMicrosoft SQL ServerSQL Server Management Studio. Connect to the SQL Server instance. 24. Create a SQL Server login for the ds2user (see the Setting up DVD Store section below for the specific script to use). 25. Restart the server before installing SQL Server 2005 x64 SP3. Installing Service Pack 3 for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 x64 Service Pack 3 is available for download from http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=ae7387c3-348c-4faa-8ae5-949fdfbe59c4&displaylang=en 1. Run SQLServer2005SP3-KB955706-x86-ENU.exe. 2. At the Welcome window, click Next. 3. At the License Terms window, select I accept the agreement, and click Next. 4. At the Feature Selection window, accept default selections, and click Next. 5. At the Authentication window, click Next. 6. At the Error and Usage Reporting Settings window, click Next. 7. At the Running Processes window, click Next. 8. Click Install. 9. If a message to reboot the computer appears, click OK. 10. At the Installation Progress window, click Next. 11. At the Installation Complete window, click Next. 12. Uncheck the Launch the User Provisioning Tool for Windows Vista after SP3 installation completes option, and click Finish. 13. Reboot the server. Installing and configuring the database clients For the DS2 scripts, we used a client system to simulate a number of users putting a load on the server. On the client machine, we created a folder we called C:\ClientShare to store workload scripts. We installed the.net 3.5 framework on each client, as the DS2 test executable requires at least.net2.0. We created a performance counter log to track the number of orders per minute each database instance returned. We followed this process for the installation: 1. Install Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x86 Edition Service Pack 2 on the client. 2. Assign a computer name of Clientx for the database client, where x is the client number. 3. For the licensing mode, use the default setting of five concurrent connections. 4. Enter a password for the administrator log on. 5. Select Eastern Time Zone. 6. Use typical settings for the Network installation. 7. Type Workgroup for the workgroup. 8. Install Windows Updates,.NET 3.5 framework, and copy the DVD Store client executable into the c:\clientshare folder. A Principled Technologies test report 7

Setting up DVD Store Data generation overview We built the database schema using the scripts in the DS2 distribution package, though we made a few minor modifications. The DS2 stress tool provides options to generate 10MB, 1GB, or 100GB datasets. To get the tool to generate the 5 GB of user data we used in this test, we had to make a few straightforward changes to the source code and to the DVD Store application s scripts. Note: We created our test data on a Linux system to take advantage of the larger RAND MAX. Editing the ds2_create_orders.c module The module ds2_create_orders.c defines constants that define the maximum values for the customer ID and the product ID. The constants for the 5GB database size did not exist. We added the constants for this size. On the command line for the ds2_create_orders.c module, we specified the size. The available options were S (small), M (medium), and L (large). We added the case V for the 5GB database. In the switch statement that sets the values for the variables max_cust_id and max_prod_id, we added cases that assigned them the proper values for the 5GB database size. We recompiled the ds2_create_orders.c module on Linux, following the instructions in the header comments. We used the following command line: gcc o ds2_create_orders ds2_create_orders.c lm Editing the ds2_create_cust.c module We had to make the same changes to the ds2_create_cust.c module that we made to the ds2_create_orders.c module. On the command line for the ds2_create_cust.c module, we specified the size. The available options were S (small), M (medium), and L (large). We added the case V for the 5GB database. In the switch statement that sets the values for the variables max_cust_id and max_prod_id, we added cases that assigned them the proper values for the 5GB database size. We recompiled the ds2_create_cust.c module on Linux, following the instructions in the header comments. We used the following command line: gcc o ds2_create_cust ds2_create_cust.c lm A Principled Technologies test report 8

Generating the data for the 5GB database We used shell scripts to run all four of the executables that generate the data. The distribution did not include shell scripts for the 5GB size. We wrote shell scripts based on the ds2_create_cust_large.sh and ds2_create_orders_large.sh scripts. The ds2_create_prod and ds2_create_inv executables did not ship with associated shell scripts, so we created shell scripts using the instructions in the readme files. We ran the shell scripts in the following order to generate the data for the 5GB database: 1. ds2_create_orders_5gb.sh 2. ds2_create_inv_5gb.sh 3. ds2_create_prod_5gb.sh 4. ds2_create_cust_5gb.sh We waited until the processes finished before we moved onto the next step. Creating the database We modified the database creation SQL Server scripts in the DVD Store distribution package to build the database schema, which includes the file structure, tables, indices, stored procedures, and triggers. We built the 5GB database in SQL Server 2005 and then performed a full backup, storing the backup file on the C: drive for quick access. We used that backup file to restore both servers between test runs. We followed these steps to create the database: 1. We created the database and file structure using database creation scripts in the DS2 download. We made size modifications specific to our 5GB database and the appropriate changes to drive letters. 2. We created database tables, stored procedures, and objects. 3. We set the database recovery model to bulk-logged to prevent excess logging. 4. We loaded the data we generated into the database. For data loading, we used the import wizard in SQL Server Management Studio. Where necessary, we retained options from the original scripts, such as Enable Identity Insert. 5. We created indices, full-text catalogs, primary keys, and foreign keys using the database-creation scripts. 6. We updated statistics on each table according to database-creation scripts, which sample 18 percent of the table data. 7. On the default SQL Server instance, we created a ds2user SQL Server login using the following Transact SQL (TSQL) script: USE [master] GO CREATE LOGIN [ds2user] WITH PASSWORD=N, DEFAULT_DATABASE=[master], DEFAULT_LANGUAGE=[us_english], CHECK_EXPIRATION=OFF, CHECK_POLICY=OFF A Principled Technologies test report 9

GO 8. We set the database recovery model back to full. We made the following changes in the build scripts: Because we varied the size of the datasets, we sized the files in our scripts to reflect the database size and the number of files per filegroup. We allowed for approximately 40 percent free space in our database files to ensure that filegrowth activity did not occur during the testing. We followed Microsoft s recommendation of having 0.25 to 1 file per filegroup per core. Both servers under test have four cores. We used four files per filegroup in all cases. We did not use the DBCC PINTABLE command for the CATEGORIES and PRODUCTS tables, both because Microsoft recommends against this practice and because the commands do nothing in SQL Server 2005. We created a SQL Server login we called ds2user and mapped a database user to this login. We made each such user a member of the db_owner fixed database role. Using the DVD Store scripts as a reference, we created the full-text catalog and index on the PRODUCTS table manually in SQL Server Management Studio. We then performed a full backup of the database. This backup allowed us to restore the databases to a pristine state relatively quickly between tests. Editing the workload script - ds2sqlserverfns.cs module We changed the connection string to increase the number of available connections, to not use the default administrator ( sa ) account, and to include a parameter for the database name. We raised the available connections limit from the default of 100 to 200 to allow room for experimentation. We created a user account we called ds2user and used that account. The ds2connect routine in the ds2sqlserverfns.cs module defines sconnectionstring. We used the following string; the changes we made appear in bold: string sconnectionstring = User ID=ds2User;Initial Catalog= +dbname+ ;Max Pool Size=200;Connection Timeout=120;Data Source= + Controller.target; Recompiling the ds2sqlserverdriver.exe executable We recompiled the ds2xdriver.cs and ds2sqlserverfns.cs module in Windows by following the instructions in the header comments. Because the DS2 instructions were for compiling from the command line, we used the following steps: 1. Open a command prompt. 2. Use the cd command to change to the directory containing our sources. 3. Run the batch file C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\Tools\vsvars32.bat. This sets up the environment variables for us. 4. Execute the following command: A Principled Technologies test report 10

csc /out:ds2sqlserverdriver.exe ds2xdriver.cs ds2sqlserverfns.cs /d:use_win32_timer /d:gen_perf_ctrs Testing procedure To perform the test, we used a series of batch files. We stored batch files on each client, under either the C:\ServerShare folder or the C:\ClientShare folder, and we used the PsExec utility to coordinate the test procedures amongst the client and server machines. We used simple file sharing or secure FTP to copy files from machine to machine, as we needed. The testing procedure consisted of the following steps: 1. Reboot the server and the client machine. 2. Wait 5 minutes for any background tasks to complete. 3. Begin recording idle power for two minutes. 4. Start the workload connections. 5. Start the workload ramp up period. 6. Start the workload. 7. Stop the workload. 8. Copy all output files. 9. Drop the database on each instance. 10. Restore the database on each instance. A Principled Technologies test report 11

APPENDIX A SERVER CONFIGURATION INFORMATION Figure 5 provides detailed configuration information about the test servers. Servers Dell PowerEdge T310 HP ProLiant ML110 G6 General processor setup Number of processor packages 1 1 Number of cores per processor package 4 4 Number of hardware threads per core 2 2 CPU Vendor Intel Intel Name Xeon X3460 Xeon X3460 Stepping B1 B1 Socket type LGA1156 LGA1156 Core frequency (GHz) 2.80 2.80 Bus frequency 2.5 GT/s 2.5 GT/s L1 cache 32 KB + 32 KB (per core) 32 KB + 32 KB (per core) L2 cache 256 KB (per core) 256 KB (per core) L3 cache (MB) 8 8 Thermal design power (TDP, in watts) 95 95 Platform Vendor and model number Dell PowerEdge T310 HP ProLiant ML110 G6 Motherboard chipset Intel 3420 Intel 3420 BIOS name and version Dell 1.2.1 (01/28/2010) HP O270126(01/26/2010) BIOS settings Turbo mode enabled Turbo mode enabled Memory modules Vendor and model number Qimonda IMSH2GE13A1F1CT13H Samsung M391B5673EH1-CH9 Type PC3-10600E DDR3 PC3-10600E DDR3 Speed (MHz) 1,333 1,333 Speed in the system currently running @ (MHz) 1,333 1,333 Timing/Latency (tcl-trcd-irptrasmin) 9-9-9-24 9-9-9-24 Size (GB) 8 8 Number of RAM modules 4 x 2 GB 4 x 2 GB Chip organization Double-sided Double-sided A Principled Technologies test report 12

Servers Dell PowerEdge T310 HP ProLiant ML110 G6 Hard disk Vendor and model number Dell ST3300657SS HP EF0300FARMU Number of disks in system 4 4 Size (GB) 300 300 Buffer size (MB) 16 16 RPM 15,000 15,000 Type SAS 6Gb/s SAS 6Gb/s Controller Dell PowerEdge RAID Controller (PERC) H700 HP Smart Array P212 Controller Operating system Name Windows Server 2008 R2 Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Enterprise Build number 7600 7600 File system NTFS NTFS Language English English Network card/subsystem Vendor and model number Broadcom BCM5716C NetXtreme II HP NC 107i PCIe Gigabit Server Gigabit Ethernet Adapter Type Integrated Integrated USB ports Number 6 6 Type USB 2.0 USB 2.0 Figure 5: Detailed configuration information for the test servers. A Principled Technologies test report 13

ABOUT PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES Principled Technologies, Inc. 1007 Slater Road, Suite 300 Durham, NC, 27703 www.principledtechnologies.com We provide industry-leading technology assessment and fact-based marketing services. We bring to every assignment extensive experience with and expertise in all aspects of technology testing and analysis, from researching new technologies, to developing new methodologies, to testing with existing and new tools. When the assessment is complete, we know how to present the results to a broad range of target audiences. We provide our clients with the materials they need, from market-focused data to use in their own collateral to custom sales aids, such as test reports, performance assessments, and white papers. Every document reflects the results of our trusted independent analysis. We provide customized services that focus on our clients individual requirements. Whether the technology involves hardware, software, Web sites, or services, we offer the experience, expertise, and tools to help our clients assess how it will fare against its competition, its performance, its market readiness, and its quality and reliability. Our founders, Mark L. Van Name and Bill Catchings, have worked together in technology assessment for over 20 years. As journalists, they published over a thousand articles on a wide array of technology subjects. They created and led the Ziff-Davis Benchmark Operation, which developed such industry-standard benchmarks as Ziff Davis Media s Winstone and WebBench. They founded and led etesting Labs, and after the acquisition of that company by Lionbridge Technologies were the head and CTO of VeriTest. Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc. All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners. Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitation of Liability: PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HAS MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY AND VALIDITY OF ITS TESTING, HOWEVER, PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, RELATING TO THE TEST RESULTS AND ANALYSIS, THEIR ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR QUALITY, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES RELYING ON THE RESULTS OF ANY TESTING DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK, AND AGREE THAT PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ITS EMPLOYEES AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FROM ANY CLAIM OF LOSS OR DAMAGE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY ALLEGED ERROR OR DEFECT IN ANY TESTING PROCEDURE OR RESULT. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH ITS TESTING, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. S LIABILITY, INCLUDING FOR DIRECT DAMAGES, EXCEED THE AMOUNTS PAID IN CONNECTION WITH PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. S TESTING. CUSTOMER S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES ARE AS SET FORTH HEREIN. A Principled Technologies test report 14