Tutorial for Response Spectrum Analysis using CAEPIPE

Similar documents
checkstress [for Intergraph's PDS]

17. SEISMIC ANALYSIS MODELING TO SATISFY BUILDING CODES

COSMOS Annual Meeting Example of Current Code Procedure Applied to Ground Motion Scaling at a Northern California Site November 18, 2005 Mark

Effect of Diagonal Modes on Response Spectrum Analysis

Random Vibration Analysis of a Circuit Board. Sean Harvey August 2000 CSI Tip of the Week

Effects and Multi Directional Seismic Ground Motion

Modal pushover-based scaling of records for nonlinear RHA of one-story unsymmetric-plan buildings

Tutorial for Steam Hammer Analysis using CAEPIPE

Figure Random vibration analysis of a simply supported beam

About the Author. Acknowledgements

A FIXED-BASE MODEL WITH CLASSICAL NORMAL MODES FOR SOIL- STRUCTURE INTERACTION SYSTEMS

NX Response Simulation: Structural dynamic response

Tutorial. BOSfluids. Water hammer (part 3) Dynamic Analysis using Caesar II

Sphero Lightning Lab Cheat Sheet

Contents. 1 Introduction. 2 Theoretical Background

NUVIB 2. Northwestern University Vibration Analysis Program. User s Manual. By: Kermin Chok Charles H. Dowding

Dealing with Data in Excel 2013/2016

NOISE PROPAGATION FROM VIBRATING STRUCTURES

Defining the Global Error of a Multi-Axis Vibration Test: An Application of MIL-STD-810G Method 527 Annex C

College Pre Calculus A Period. Weekly Review Sheet # 1 Assigned: Monday, 9/9/2013 Due: Friday, 9/13/2013

Webinar Parameter Identification with optislang. Dynardo GmbH

MANUAL COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES INC.

Generative Dynamic Response Analysis

CHAPTER 5 RANDOM VIBRATION TESTS ON DIP-PCB ASSEMBLY

SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL OF BUILDING STRUCTURES USING A NEURO-FUZZY CONTROLLER WITH ACCELERATION FEEDBACK

Vibration Analysis with SOLIDWORKS Simulation and SOLIDWORKS. Before you start 7

VARIOUS APPROACHES USED IN THE SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF THE PIPING SYSTEMS IN NUCLEAR FACILITIES. Introduction

James O. Malley Senior Principal, Degenkolb Engineers

Section 1.1 The Distance and Midpoint Formulas; Graphing Utilities; Introduction to Graphing Equations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley

2

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley

ProShake 2.0. The first step in this tutorial exercise is to start the ProShake 2.0 program. Click on the ProShake 2.0 icon to start the program.

FREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING

OpenFresco Framework for Hybrid Simulation: UI-SimCor v2.6 Example

METHODS OF ASSESSING STABILITY UNDER SEISMIC LOADING FOR GRAVITY DAMS.

Tutorial on Qualification of Nozzles attached to Spherical/Cylindrical Vessels using CAEPIPE

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A GENERATOR ON AN ELASTIC FOUNDATION

URS Washington Division, Princeton, NJ, USA. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Kobe, Japan

Problem description C L. Tank walls. Water in tank

Quadratic Functions CHAPTER. 1.1 Lots and Projectiles Introduction to Quadratic Functions p. 31

ProShake. User s Manual. Ground Response Analysis Program. Version 2.0. Copyright by EduPro Civil Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

1.4. Comparing Graphs of Linear Motion. Acceleration Time Graphs

SAP2000 Version Release Notes

9 FREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING

SEISMIC ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AFFECTED BY STRUCTURAL MODELING

2-9 Operations with Complex Numbers

Unit 1 Quadratic Functions

September 2015, for Version 2.0.0

Information Document

HALF YEARLY EXAMINATIONS 2015/2016. Answer ALL questions showing your working Where necessary give your answers correct to 2 decimal places.

Calculation of initial pretension for a cable-stayed bridge using Cable Force Tuning function in midas Civil

Linear Equations in Two Variables IMPORTANT TERMS, DEFINITIONS AND RESULTS ANIL TUTORIALS SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

Introduction to CS graphs and plots in Excel Jacek Wiślicki, Laurent Babout,

Pre-Lab Excel Problem

Help Page for the Java-Powered Simulation for Experimental Structural Dynamics

Step by Step. Advanced Tutorial for AxisVM X4. Edited by: Inter-CAD Kft.

2

WinIGS. Windows Based Integrated Grounding System Design Program. Structural Dynamic Analysis Training Guide. Last Revision: February 2017

SMSIM Calibration for the SCEC Validation Project NGA-East Workshop Berkeley 12/11/12

GeoDAS Software of GeoSIG

Online data of Greek accelerometer stations

Challenge Problem 5 - The Solution Dynamic Characteristics of a Truss Structure

Graphing with Microsoft Excel

Learning Objectives. Math Prerequisites. Technology Prerequisites. Materials. Math Objectives. Technology Objectives

ProShake Ground Response Analysis Program Version 2.0 User s Manual

ODS & Modal Testing Using a Transmissibility Chain

Simulation of Sloshing Effects in Cylindrical Containers under Seismic Loading

Highlights from Chapter 12 of ASCE 7-16 Provisions for Linear Dynamic Analysis

FREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING

For example, Table 1 is a set of data defining the surface area of ellipsoids as a function of two of the three semi-axes lengths.

STUDY ON MODEL REDUCTION OF LARGE STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS FOR ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL

Information Document

Fitting Fragility Functions to Structural Analysis Data Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Orientation dependence of ground motion and structural response of reinforced concrete space frames

MATH 31A HOMEWORK 9 (DUE 12/6) PARTS (A) AND (B) SECTION 5.4. f(x) = x + 1 x 2 + 9, F (7) = 0

Class IX Mathematics (Ex. 3.1) Questions

USING NEURAL NETWORK FOR PREDICTION OF THE DYNAMIC PERIOD AND AMPLIFICATION FACTOR OF SOIL FOR MICROZONATION IN URBAN AREA

ME 575: Two-bar Truss

Background CE 342. Why RISA-2D? Availability

January 2016, for Version 2.2.0

Position Analysis

ACCURACY OF THE SUBTRACTION MODEL USED IN SASSI

Unit #13 : Integration to Find Areas and Volumes, Volumes of Revolution

Using Impulse Response Functions to Evaluate Baseball Bats

Section 2.4 Library of Functions; Piecewise-Defined Functions

0 Graphical Analysis Use of Excel

WinFElt Manual. Problem description

Introduction to Fitting ASCII Data with Errors: Single Component Source Models

Engineering Effects of Boundary Conditions (Fixtures and Temperatures) J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering

Optimization to Reduce Automobile Cabin Noise

Load Case Definition in CAESAR II

REGULARITY INDICES FOR BRIDGE STRUCTURES

1224. Seismic test and numerical verification of the scaled-down reinforced concrete containment vessel

Program flatten reads in an input seismic or attribute volume as well as a picked horizon and generates a flattened output volume:

Tutorial 1: Welded Frame - Problem Description

+ b. From this we can derive the following equations:

Analysis of Pile Behaviour due to Damped Vibration by Finite Element Method (FEM)

Using OPUS to Process Evolved Gas Data (8/12/15 edits highlighted)

Unit 6 Quadratic Functions

Transcription:

Tutorial for Response Spectrum Analysis using CAEPIPE The following are the Steps for performing the Response Spectrum Analysis using CAEPIPE. General The Response Spectrum is a plot of the maximum response (maximum displacement, velocity, acceleration or any other quantity of interest) to a specified dynamic loading applied on all possible single degree-of-freedom systems. The abscissa of the spectrum is the natural frequency (or period) of the system, and the ordinate is the maximum response. In general, response spectra for a seismic event are prepared by calculating the maximum response to a specified ground motion excitation of single degree-of-freedom systems with various amounts of damping. Numerical integration with short time steps is used to calculate the response of each single degree-of-freedom system. The step-by-step process is continued until the total earthquake record is completed, the results of which becomes the response of that system to that excitation. Change the parameters of the system to change its natural frequency, repeat the process for the same excitation and record the new maximum response. This process is repeated until all frequencies of interest have been covered and the results plotted. Typically the El Centro, California earthquake of 1940 is used for this purpose. Attached ( ElCentro.txt ) is an ASCII file that contains spectrum from El Centro, California earthquake of 1940. [First line in this file is the name of the spectrum. Second line defines the Units for Abscissa (X-axis) and Ordinate (Y-axis) axes, separated by a space. Starting from the 3 rd line, the first column is Abscissa and the second column is Ordinate. For further details on this ASCII file, refer to the Spectrums subsection under Misc. section of Menus in the CAEPIPE User s Manual.] Response Spectrum thus prepared as explained above is then input/imported into CAEPIPE Stress model for analysis through CAEPIPE Layout window > Misc > Spectrums. Once the inputting of different spectrums are done, input the Spectrum load applicable for the current analysis through Layout window > Spectrum. Save the model and perform analysis using CAEPIPE. Spectrum load specified will be applied simultaneously at all supports during the uniform response spectrum analysis, following which CAEPIPE will compute the modal and directional responses (to this uniform excitation), which are further combined as per the combination method selected. Since the response spectra give only maximum response, only the maximum values for each mode are calculated and then superimposed (modal combination) to give total response. A conservative upper bound for the total response may be obtained by adding the absolute values of the maximum modal components (absolute sum). However this is excessively conservative and a more probable value of the maximum response is the square root of the sum of squares (SRSS) of the modal maxima. Ensure the CAEPIPE results meet project specific analysis requirements. If not, make changes to piping layout and/or changes to support types and their locations and then reanalyze the model until the analysis requirements are met.

Tutorial Step 1: Attached is a sample CAEPIPE model with Response Spectrum. The piping layout shown below (extracted from the attached model) is for a water supply line that has the following layout and properties. The Analysis Code is specified as B31.9 for this sample model.

Step 2: Input Spectrums into CAEPIPE. This can be done in three ways: 1. Input spectrums directly into the model. 2. Create a spectrum library and load spectrums from it. 3. Input spectrums from a text file. When the first two methods are used, the units for the X- and the Y-axes as well as the interpolation method are set through the menu Options > Spectrum. For the sample layout described above, spectrum was input directly into CAEPIPE model manually. In case you wish to read in the supplied ElCentro.txt spectrum file into the CAEPIPE model, select Read Spectrum from the File menu in the Layout window. Step 3: Once the inputting of different spectrums are done, input the Spectrum load itself for analysis through Layout window > Spectrum.

X, Y and Z spectrums Select a spectrum from the drop-down combo box, which should have been input in the spectrum table for each direction. Factor The multiplying (scale) factor for the spectrum is input here. The same spectrum may be multiplied by different (Scale) factors to apply spectrum loads for different dynamic events. Mode Sum Pick one of three choices, SRSS (square root of sum of squares), Closely spaced or Absolute. Direction Sum Pick one of two choices, SRSS (square root of sum of squares) or Absolute. Step 4: Include Response spectrum analysis load case through Layout window > Load cases. Save the model and perform the analysis through Layout window > File > Analyze. CAEPIPE will apply these loads to compute the response of the piping system by performing a Response Spectrum analysis along with other load cases defined in the piping system.

Step 5: Upon successful analysis, CAEPIPE will now show a Load case with name Response spectrum under Support Loads, Displacements, Element forces and Support load summary results.