to-end System Test Architecture

Similar documents
15,000+ Networks, 5 Million+ Users:

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic Information Warfare Research Project (IWRP)

UAVs as Communications Routing Nodes in Network-Centric Warfare

Avionics Cyber T&E Examples Testing Cyber Security Resilience to support Operations in the 3rd Offset Environment

Integrated C4isr and Cyber Solutions

NEXIUM THEATRE. Tactical networks for defence and security forces

Data-Centric Architecture for Space Systems

UBIQUITIOUS, RESILIENT, SECURE CONNECTIVITY IN THE NEAR-PEER THREAT ENVIRONMENT

WHAT IS IRIDIUM PRIME?

Cyber Perspectives. Science and Technology Roadmap

Inmarsat Global Xpress Global. Mobile. Trusted. U.S. Government > Services > Global Xpress

BAE SYSTEMS Developing Coalition Interoperability Marcus Krackowizer - September 2004

Service-Oriented Architecture for Command and Control Systems with Dynamic Reconfiguration

DRS Network & Imaging Systems Capabilities Guide. NETWORK COMPUTING & TEST SOLUTIONS Capabilities Guide

Securing Content in the Department of Defense s Global Information Grid

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date February 2007 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E Defense-Wide, BA 7

SDDC CAMPAIGN PLAN OVERVIEW MILITARY SURFACE DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION COMMAND

Air Force Test Center

Directed Energy S&T. Challenges Overview. L. Bruce Simpson, SES Director Directed Energy Directorate Kirtland AFB, New Mexico

Computing and Communications Infrastructure for Network-Centric Warfare: Exploiting COTS, Assuring Performance

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Beyond Web Services A network-centric approach to system design

DISN Evolution. TDM Elimination. Mr. Jessie L. Showers, JR., SES Infrastructure Executive (IE) 15 June 2017 UNITED IN SERVICE TO OUR NATION

The Perfect Storm Cyber RDT&E

TASMUS.

Improving SCADA System Security

Some satellite related aspects and topics. Adam Kapovits Programme Manager Eurescom GmbH

Headquarters U. S. Air Force

Marine Corps Tactical System Support Activity

FAR M RE THAN SATELLITE BANDWIDTH

CommonSENSE: Software for displaying Full Motion Video for mission-critical C4ISR working positions

Global Xpress. 10 things you need to know about GX. GLOBAL GOVERNMENT > Solution > GX 10 things

MODEL-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT OF COMMAND AND CONTROL CAPABILITIES FOR JOINT AND COALITION WARFARE

Secure information exchange

Cloud-based Open Architecture Approach for Common Enterprise Ground Services

69 th IFIP WG 10.4 Meeting Dependability & IoT

Raytheon Mission Architecture Program (RayMAP) Topic 1: C2 Concepts, Theory, and Policy Paper #40

Cybersecurity and resilience A priority for global enterprise

Inmarsat Global Xpress. Global, Mobile, Trusted.

Hybrid Mesh Networking for Distributed Operations

Trusted. Core to Edge.

Inmarsat Global Xpress Global, Mobile, Trusted. U.S. Government > Services > Global Xpress

Electronic and Mission Systems

A Standards-Based Integration Platform for Reconfigurable Unmanned Aircraft Systems

The Net-Enabled Future:

WAN-DDS A wide area data distribution capability

Data Center Interconnect Solution Overview

UAS Operation in National Air Space (NAS) Secure UAS Command and Control

Information Sharing in the GIG Environment and the C2 Perspective

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Command Control and Communications. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

NCW END-TO-END (NETE) MODEL FOR FUTURE C2 ARCHITECTURE ASSESSMENTS

NASA s Exploration Initiative: Retooling the Approach to Mission Systems

Overview of the BATS Project

SAE AS5643 and IEEE1394 Deliver Flexible Deterministic Solution for Aerospace and Defense Applications

IPv6 Transition JITC Oct 8-9, 2002 FT Huachuca, AZ

Net-centric Characteristics

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #49 Page 1 of 10

Defense & Aerospace. Networked visualization for distributed mission operations

Air Traffic Management. Defence. vitalsphere. ATM-grade network references. Public Transport. Public Safety. Maritime

SYNERGISTIC WARFARE COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS

A New Satellite Paradigm. Ronald van der Breggen Chief Commercial Officer LeoSat

Seamless Situational Awareness

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2000

Chain of Command. Chief of Naval Operations. Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command. COMNAVMETOCCOM (CNMOC) Stennis Space Center, MS

Inmarsat Global Xpress

Castle Image Options. CBM-400 Multi-Mission Modem with Flexible Waveforms. 15 November 2017 VIASAT PROPRIETARY

Satellite Technology Trends - A perspective from Intelsat

Implementing Net-Centric Tactical Warfare Systems

A joint approach to tactical data links The Swedish way

How to Develop Predictable On-the- Move Communications Faster and at Lower Cost Using Real-Time Network Emulation

NCES Program Overview. Rita Espiritu NCES Program Manager

Department of Defense Emerging Needs for Standardization

9AIR CRS CONTROL & REPORTING SYSTEM

thalesgroup.com NETWORK & INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS NEXIUM SAT Your battlefield-proven partner Anytime, anywhere

Next Generation Enterprise Network- Recompete (NGEN-R) Industry Day

over-satellite Technology Development

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Nanosatellite Communication Constellation Testbed for Autonomous Scheduling Algorithms to Enable Mission Performance Analysis and Demonstration

CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM (CTEIP) PE D FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005

Multi-Domain C2 AF Strategic Integration Group (AF-SIG)

USSTRATCOM Global C2. Mr Dave Gelenter USSTRATCOM/J86 Mar This Briefing is UNCLASSIFIED

Multi-Band (Ku, C, Wideband - Satcom, Narrowband Satcom) Telemetry Test System for UAV Application

Advanced VSAT Networking Infrastructures Solutions for Offshore. John Meyers Wavestream Thailand November 20, 2014

Chapter 5 Ad Hoc Wireless Network. Jang Ping Sheu

Towards Effective Cybersecurity for Modular, Open Architecture Satellite Systems

IMPLEMENTING MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKING (MANET) OVER LEGACY TACTICAL RADIO LINKS. Presented at MILCOM 2007 October 29, 2007

THE INTERNET OF THINGS FOR DEFENSE

WZRDnet. A Low-Power Wireless Ad-Hoc Mesh Network for Austere Tactical Environments. February 14, 2018

CONVERTING SENSOR DATA TO TACTICAL INFORMATION

Cisco 5921 Embedded Services Router

Mission Aware Cybersecurity

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #218

Title of Presentation

SKY Perfect JSAT Corporation Overview. June 2018

Inmarsat SwiftBroadband For U.S. Government Airborne Operations. U.S. Government > Services > SwiftBroadband

IT114 NETWORK+ Learning Unit 1 Objectives: 1, 2 Time In-Class Time Out-Of-Class Hours 2-3. Lectures: Course Introduction and Overview

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

OUTLINE. Where we ve come from: CCSDS space links. Where we are now: Where we are going: MTO possibilities

Air Force Test Center

Agile Coalition Environment (ACE) Freedom within a Framework. Michele McGuire Space & Naval Warfare Systems Command Office of Chief Engineer (056)

Transcription:

End-to to-end System Test Architecture Sr. Manager, Lockheed Martin SSC masuma.ahmed@lmco.com (408) 742-2553 2553 1

Net-Centric Mission Operations Features Fully Synchronized Interoperable, of ed Systems and Mission Capabilities ed Battle Command To The Warfighter ed Multi-Spectral Air, Ground, Space Sensors & Shooters Rapidly Reconfigurable ed Real Time C4ISR Capabilities Adaptable Information Formats for Command/Mission Simultaneous Real-time, Near-real Time, Non-real Time, Applications -Centric Collaborative SOA / Infrastructure Seamless Information Sharing Across Forces, Multinational and Interagency Partners Built-in Redundancy with Operations Continuity of ed C4ISR Capabilities 2

Net-Enabled Capabilities Ñ Shortens Chain of Attack Ñ Provides Decision Superiority Greater Speed Greater Precision Ñ Capabilities Supported Global Connectivity Enabled Platforms/Weapons Fused Intelligence Real Time Command / Control & Situational Awareness Key: Net-Centric Operations IP-based Routing, Shared Data, Assured Service 3

Air Force Vision - One Space Layer Transformational Communications Satellite Constellations, Operations & Management Systems Near Earth Orbit & Airborne Layer JTRS, Laser Optics, BMC2, NATO AGS, E-2C Hawkeye, J-UCAS, UAVs Maneuver Layer (upper echelon) Future Combat Systems, Blue Force Tracking Maneuver Layer (lower echelon) Sensors, Weapon Systems, Munitions Data link Terrestrial Layer GIG-BE, Teleport, CAOC Characteristics Robust Self-Forming, Self-Healing of Mobile War Fighters IP Routing Platform For Information Flow Between Ground, Air and Space s Merged Defense and Space Infrastructure 4

TEST & INTEGRATION CHALLENGES Netcentric Scope Encompasses Integration of Diverse Systems, Technologies, Applications, and Protocols Across Forces, Multinational and Interagency Partners. This Requires Understanding, Test, and Verification of Transparent Interoperability of Protocols and Systems Across of Diverse s Simulating Communications Systems, Sensors, Weapons, and War Fighters in an End-to-End Test Environment Data Consistency End-to-End Multi-step Processing End-to-End Assured Service Interoperability End-to-End Seamless Integration of Net-Centric Capabilities Requires Robust Test & Verification Environments 5

TECHNOLOGY & PROTOCOL ISSUES Technology and Protocol Standards Are Not Perfect Diverse Systems Implementing the Same Standards May Support Different Requirements Protocol Interoperability Testing and Verifying Interoperability Across of s - Challenging OSI Protocol Layers Can Span Across a Single or Many Interfaces Across of s Non-transparency of Protocol Layers - Costly Mission Failure Isolating and Mitigating Issues with E2E Protocol Layers - Difficult, Time Consuming and Costly Simulating, Testing, and Verifying Real-time, Near-real Time and Non-real Time Protocols E2E in Multi-vendor Environment Complex and Time Consuming Test & Verifications of of ed Systems Logistically Complex 6

E2E TEST CONSIDERATIONS Any Net-centric Mission Systems Must Be Tested in True Battlefield Conditions Prior to Deployment End to End Protocol Interoperability Fundamental To Success of Netcentric Mission Operations of ed Systems Use Multi-layered Protocol Architecture to Communicate Transparently Across ed Systems Tested in a Distributed E2E Test Architecture Emulating Real-time, Near-real Time, and Non-real Time Protocols, Interfaces, and Technologies across ed Systems Designed with Hierarchical Protocol Architecture in Mind Emulated All Segments Supporting Virtual Test Systems For Multiple Test Scenarios Net-Centric, Distributed, E2E System Test Architecture 7

Test Architecture Considerations Mesh vs Hub/Spoke Architecture Cost, Schedule, & Protocol Considerations Management, Control and Data Planes Distributed vs Centralized Control Overlay Protocol Architectures Security Architecture, Protocols & Boundaries Security at Physical and Higher Protocol Layers Hardware, Software, Simulators, & Emulators Integration Complex Protocol Interactions Architectural Requirements Adaptability to Changes Reconfigurable Remote Configurability Multi- Protocol Support Protocol Fidelity Adaptable & Reconfigurable Secured System Test Architecture 8

Distributed System Test Architecture Issues Latency Security Timing Data Integrity Service Availability Race Conditions Priorities Early Planning and Detail Requirements Specifications Essential 9

of s - A Simplified Example Naval Ship Space Constellation Access Off-Net Ground & Terrestrial s Airborne On-Net 10

ed Satcom Service Example Space Data Voice Mobile Base Station Data Voice Commands Streaming Video Mobile Base Station UAV Special Operations Force Mobile Base Station Data Voice Data Voice Battlefield End-Users Broadcast Army Exploit Regional Operations Center (ROC) Strike Force Terrestrial Battlefield End-Users NMC Battlefield End-Users On-net P2MP Streaming Video On-net P2P Data/Voice On-net P2MP Data/Voice Command Thick Lines Trunk Links 11

ed Protocol Layers (L1, L2, L7) - Example Naval Ship L7 L1, L2 L7 Space Constellation L1, L2 Access L1, L2 Off-Net L1, L2 Ground & Terrestrial s L1, L2 Airborne On-Net Testing L7 Performance Over Diverse L1 / L2 Complex & Challenging 12

Physical and Data Link Layers (L1, L2) Terminate Between Adjacent Systems In The Same or Adjacent s Data Link Layer Performance Depends on Physical Layer Performance Application Layer Transparent to Physical and Data Link Layers Example: Physical Layer - RF, SONET; Data Link Layer Link 16, Ethernet MAC Application Layer (L7) Protocol Performance Traverses Multiple s & Terminates End to End Rides On Diverse & Multiple Physical & Data Link Layers (L1, L2) Uses Services of Lower Protocol Layers L7 Performance and Data Integrity Depend on Lower Protocol Layer Performance (e.g. Timing) Example: Email, Streaming Video, Audio, File Transfer, Web Browsing L7 Performance Depends on L1 / L2 Performance 13

Distributed System Test Architecture - Example S/C Bus, SOCC (Satellite Support Function) L1, L2 Emulation S/C P/L, G/W (Data Transport S/C: Spacecraft Function) P/L: Payload G/W: Gateway ROC: Regional Operations Center NOC: Management Center SOCC: Satellite Operations/Control Center TE: Terminal Wide Area L7 L1, L2 Emulation L1, L2 Emulation TE, ROC, NMC ( Access Function) Supports Virtual Test Systems for Multiple Test Scenarios 14

Distributed System Test Architecture Features Emulates Multi-Segments Space, Air, Terrestrial Systems, Elements, Interfaces, & Protocols Consists of Geographically Distributed, Multiple System Integration Labs (SILs) Test Beds Simulators Emulators Control Centers Interconnected by Wide Area s (WAN) Supports Multi-Element and Flight Element Integration, Test and Verification Multiple Software and Database Integration and Integrated SW Load Testing Prototyping Hierarchical Protocol Layers and Interfaces Simultaneous Test and Verification of Command / Control, Application,, and Lower Protocol Layers and Interfaces Functions Performance Load Prove Out C4ISR Interoperability End to End Supports Simultaneous Test and Verification 15

Summary Distributed ed E2E System Test Architecture is Essential To Ensure Interoperability of ed C4ISR Capabilities Across of Diverse s Before Deployment Test and Verify Transparency of All ed Protocol Layers Emulate and Test True Battlefield Conditions by Simulating ed Elements, Protocols, Interfaces, and Systems Support Test-Like-You-Operate Facilitate Early Risk Reduction Verify Power of ed War Fighting Before Deployment 16

17