Improving CDISC SDTM Data Quality & Compliance Right from the Beginning

Similar documents
Out-of-the-box %definexml

Step Up Your ADaM Compliance Game Ramesh Ayyappath & Graham Oakley

Beyond OpenCDISC: Using Define.xml Metadata to Ensure End-to-End Submission Integrity. John Brega Linda Collins PharmaStat LLC

CDISC Variable Mapping and Control Terminology Implementation Made Easy

TS04. Running OpenCDISC from SAS. Mark Crangle

Optimization of the traceability when applying an ADaM Parallel Conversion Method

Power Data Explorer (PDE) - Data Exploration in an All-In-One Dynamic Report Using SAS & EXCEL

Standards Driven Innovation

Improving Metadata Compliance and Assessing Quality Metrics with a Standards Library

PharmaSUG Paper DS16

Updates on CDISC Standards Validation

AUTOMATED CREATION OF SUBMISSION-READY ARTIFACTS SILAS MCKEE

PharmaSUG Paper PO22

An Alternate Way to Create the Standard SDTM Domains

PhUSE US Connect 2019

From Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here. About This Book... xi About The Authors... xvii Acknowledgments...

From ODM to SDTM: An End-to-End Approach Applied to Phase I Clinical Trials

CDISC Migra+on. PhUSE 2010 Berlin. 47 of the top 50 biopharmaceu+cal firms use Cytel sofware to design, simulate and analyze their clinical studies.

An Efficient Solution to Efficacy ADaM Design and Implementation

Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India

BUSINESS-BASED VALUE IN AN MDR

Generating Define.xml from Pinnacle 21 Community

Best Practices for E2E DB build process and Efficiency on CDASH to SDTM data Tao Yang, FMD K&L, Nanjing, China

A SDTM Legacy Data Conversion

SAS offers technology to facilitate working with CDISC standards : the metadata perspective.

Automation of SDTM Programming in Oncology Disease Response Domain Yiwen Wang, Yu Cheng, Ju Chen Eli Lilly and Company, China

SAS Online Training: Course contents: Agenda:

Creating Define-XML v2 with the SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit 1.6 Lex Jansen, SAS

CDISC SDTM and ADaM Real World Issues

What is high quality study metadata?

Taming the SHREW. SDTM Heuristic Research and Evaluation Workshop

CDASH MODEL 1.0 AND CDASHIG 2.0. Kathleen Mellars Special Thanks to the CDASH Model and CDASHIG Teams

ADaM Compliance Starts with ADaM Specifications

How a Metadata Repository enables dynamism and automation in SDTM-like dataset generation

define.xml: A Crash Course Frank DiIorio

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

Optimization of the traceability when applying an ADaM Parallel Conversion Method

PhUSE EU Connect Paper PP15. Stop Copying CDISC Standards. Craig Parry, SyneQuaNon, Diss, England

Dataset-XML - A New CDISC Standard

PharmaSUG Paper DS06 Designing and Tuning ADaM Datasets. Songhui ZHU, K&L Consulting Services, Fort Washington, PA

CDISC Standards and the Semantic Web

Study Data Reviewer s Guide Completion Guideline

SDTM-ETL TM. New features in version 1.6. Author: Jozef Aerts XML4Pharma July SDTM-ETL TM : New features in v.1.6

Overview of HASH Objects Swarnalatha Gaddam, Cytel Inc. Hyderabad, India

Advantages of a real end-to-end approach with CDISC standards

Johannes Ulander. Standardisation and Harmonisation Specialist S-Cubed. PhUSE SDE Beerse,

SAS Clinical Data Integration 2.4

Conversion of Company Standard Trial Data to SDTM

CDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library. Guang-liang Wang September 18, Q3 DCDISC Meeting

Metadata and ADaM.

Hanming Tu, Accenture, Berwyn, USA

Streamline SDTM Development and QC

How to write ADaM specifications like a ninja.

SAS CLINICAL SYLLABUS. DURATION: - 60 Hours

Tips on Creating a Strategy for a CDISC Submission Rajkumar Sharma, Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA

Automated Creation of Submission-Ready Artifacts Silas McKee, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA Lourdes Devenney, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA

SDTM Attribute Checking Tool Ellen Xiao, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

OpenCDISC Validator 1.4 What s New?

Managing CDISC version changes: how & when to implement? Presented by Lauren Shinaberry, Project Manager Business & Decision Life Sciences

How to validate clinical data more efficiently with SAS Clinical Standards Toolkit

Common Programming Errors in CDISC Data

Submission-Ready Define.xml Files Using SAS Clinical Data Integration Melissa R. Martinez, SAS Institute, Cary, NC USA

Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here.

PMDA Valida+on Rules. Preparing for your next submission to Japanese Pharmaceu6cals and Medical Devices Agency. Max Kanevsky December 10, 2015

SAS Training BASE SAS CONCEPTS BASE SAS:

How to handle different versions of SDTM & DEFINE generation in a Single Study?

ADaM and traceability: Chiesi experience

Controlling OpenCDISC using R. Martin Gregory PhUSE 2012 Budapest, October 2012

PharmaSUG Paper AD03

The application of SDTM in a disease (oncology)-oriented organization

Legacy to SDTM Conversion Workshop: Tools and Techniques

Best Practice for Explaining Validation Results in the Study Data Reviewer s Guide

Challenges with the interpreta/on of CDISC - Who can we trust?

Sandra Minjoe, Accenture Life Sciences John Brega, PharmaStat. PharmaSUG Single Day Event San Francisco Bay Area

Xiangchen (Bob) Cui, Tathabbai Pakalapati, Qunming Dong Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA

Prove It! Importance and Methodologies of Validation in Clinical Trials Reporting

SAS Clinical Data Integration Server 2.1

Rave Study Design and Build Essentials Training Agenda

Standards Metadata Management (System)

Why organizations need MDR system to manage clinical metadata?

MY ATTEMPT TO RID THE CLINICAL WORLD OF EXCEL MIKE MOLTER DIRECTOR OF STATISTICAL PROGRAMMING AND TECHNOLOGY WRIGHT AVE OCTOBER 27, 2016

SAS (Statistical Analysis Software/System)

Introduction to Define.xml

From SDTM to displays, through ADaM & Analyses Results Metadata, a flight on board METADATA Airlines

THE DATA DETECTIVE HINTS AND TIPS FOR INDEPENDENT PROGRAMMING QC. PhUSE Bethan Thomas DATE PRESENTED BY

Applying ADaM Principles in Developing a Response Analysis Dataset

Traceability Look for the source of your analysis results

Standards Implementation: It Should be Simple Right? Thursday January 18, 2018

Planning to Pool SDTM by Creating and Maintaining a Sponsor-Specific Controlled Terminology Database

Standardising The Standards The Benefits of Consistency

%check_codelist: A SAS macro to check SDTM domains against controlled terminology

SDD Unleashed - Extending the Capabilities of SAS Drug Development

DIA 11234: CDER Data Standards Common Issues Document webinar questions

Making a List, Checking it Twice (Part 1): Techniques for Specifying and Validating Analysis Datasets

PhUSE Paper TT05

The Devil is in the Details Reporting from Pinnacle 21 (OpenCDISC) Validation Report

Traceability in the ADaM Standard Ed Lombardi, SynteractHCR, Inc., Carlsbad, CA

The Wonderful World of Define.xml.. Practical Uses Today. Mark Wheeldon, CEO, Formedix DC User Group, Washington, 9 th December 2008

SDTM-ETL 3.0 User Manual and Tutorial

Sample Sessions. Portfolio Companies: Selecting a portfolio company founding date range and primary industry. Sample Session.

Transcription:

Improving CDISC Data Quality & Compliance Right from the Beginning Bharat Chaudhary, Cytel Padamsimh Balekundri, Cytel Session CD08 PhUSE 2015, Vienna

Agenda Background Overview: Development The Problem: In Development Our Solution: Set of Utilities Summary 2

Background (Study Data Tabulation Model) Beneficial for clinical data reviewers & analysts as it brings standardization in presenting the data Complexity of standards - Risk of compliance issue Rework Validation tools & Techniques - Limitations Scope for Improvement Ideas 3

Overview: Development acrf Specification Program development CDMS Data independent validation datasets OpenCDISC Validator 4

The Problem: In development acrf Specification Program development CDMS Data independent validation REWORK datasets OpenCDISC Validator 5

Solution 1 2 acrf Specification Program development CDMS Data independent validation REWORK datasets 3 What can be done? OpenCDISC Validator 6

Steps to go through Rework Area Solution With & Without 7

Solution 1 8

Solution 1 Rework Area acrf Specification Program development CDMS Data independent validation datasets ü We might miss the basics while creating the spec (specification) ü End up creating multiple versions of spec OpenCDISC Validator 9

Solution 1 Spec Checker (SSC) Solution ü Identify compliance issues at spec level, even before programming ü Minimize the number of spec versions, which saves time & efforts 10

Solution 1 Framework (SSC) Technology: Inputs: Execution Time: MS Excel Spec < 1 Min Single Window View IG Standards COMPARE Imported Metadata from spec Result 11

Execution Step Solution 1 1. Mapping specification open/active (SSC) 2. Spec Checker 12

Solution 1 (SSC) 13

Solution 1 (SSC) 14

Solution 1 (SSC) 15

Final Report Solution 1 (SSC) 16

Final Report Solution 1 (SSC) 17

Solution 1 Average time taken to review the Specification with 10 domains. (SSC) 3-4 Hrs With & Without <20 Min 18

Solution 2 19

Solution 2 Rework Area acrf Specification Program development CDMS Data independent validation datasets ü ü compliance & Data consistency errors are not identified End up doing multiple validation cycles OpenCDISC Validator 20

Solution 2 Dataset Checker (SDC) Solution ü ü Identify data quality and compliance issues at development stage Minimize the number of validation cycle, which saves time & efforts 21

Framework Solution 2 SDC Technology: Inputs: Execution Time: (SDC) SAS Macro SAS Dataset < 5 Min datasets 22

Framework Solution 2 (SDC) Master Macro ü ü Having inbuilt checks First these checks will apply on the Domain 23

Framework Solution 2 (SDC) CDISC Master file ü It s a reference file ü Having metadata of commonly used CDISC IG versions 24

Solution 2 Framework (SDC) ü ü Checks file Having Checks in this excel file User can add any number of custom checks 25

Framework Solution 2 (SDC) Study Specific macro ü ü User-defined checks If user wants to add any complex algorithm 26

Execution Step Solution 2 (SDC) To apply on all domains in sdtm library : %sdtm_chk (sdtm_v=3.1.2, lib= sdtm); To apply on specific domain (i.e. LB) : %sdtm_chk (sdtm_v=3.1.2, lib= sdtm, check=lb ); 27

Final Report Solution 2 (SDC) ü Easy navigation & filtering can be applied for better understanding of issues 28

Real Life Example Solution 2 Date of early visit > Date of later visit (SDC) Duplicate records Unexpected Results 29

Real Life Example Solution 2 (SDC) Non missing -ORRES & -ORRESU but --STRESC is blank Incorrect order of variables, USUBJID before DOMAIN 30

Solution 2 Average time taken to review the SAS Dataset with 1 domain. (SDC) 2-3 Hrs With & Without <25 Min 31

Solution 3 32

Solution 3 Rework Area acrf Specification Program development CDMS Data independent validation ü ü datasets Repeat runs of OpenCDISC validator for same study Possibility of missing to identify new issues each time we run the validator OpenCDISC Validator 33

Solution 3 OpenCDISC Report Reviewer (OCR) Solution ü It saves time on multiple report reviews for the same study, by Importing and aligning comments from previous/first report Identifying new errors/warnings 34

Framework Solution 3 Technology: Inputs: Execution Time: (OCR) MS Excel-VBA Macro Reviewed OpenCDISC Report < 2 min Reviewed Report OCR New Summarized Report Importing Comments 35

Execution Step Solution 3 ü First reviewed OpenCDISC Report (OCR) ü New report 36

Execution Step Solution 3 (OCR) ü will import comments from previous report and align them with new report ü Filter out New Errors and address it, Instead of reviewing entire report 37

Final Report Solution 3 (OCR) ü The OCR utility also generates the summary report 38

Solution 3 Average time taken to review new errors in OpenCDISC Reports. (OCR) 2-3 Hrs With & Without <2 Min 39

Summary SSC acrf Specification Program development CDMS Data independent validation REWORK datasets SDC OpenCDISC Validator OCR 40

Questions? Thank you!! bharat.chaudhary@cytel.com padamsimh.balekundri@cytel.com 41