UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Applied Research. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #18

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #65

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Data to Decisions Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #49 Page 1 of 10

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8W: IT Software Development Initiatives. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #193

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Software Engineering Institute (SEI) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #192

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

UNCLASSIFIED. All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 IT President's Budget Request Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Network Centric Collaborative Targeting FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface ASW

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #218

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 110

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Command Control and Communications. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

Introducing Cyber Resiliency Concerns Into Engineering Education

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date February 2007 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E Defense-Wide, BA 7

The University of Queensland

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Polar MILSATCOM (Space) FY 2012 OCO

Implementing a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) to Achieve Acquisition Agility in Defense Acquisition Programs

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Navy Tactical Computer Resources

New Horizons. Dr. Bryant Wysocki Chief Engineer AFRL Information Directorate. 13 March 2017

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Defense Engineering Excellence

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Tactical Data Links

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Rocky Mountain Cyberspace Symposium 2018 DoD Cyber Resiliency

Cisco Connected Factory Accelerator Bundles

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

The Perfect Storm Cyber RDT&E

DATA SHEET RISK & CYBERSECURITY PRACTICE EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS TO TAKE COMMAND OF THEIR EVOLVING RISK & CYBERSECURITY POSTURE

Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure

DELIVERING MISSION BASED OUTCOMES TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY SINCE 2002 MISSION-DRIVEN SOLUTIONS 1

Accelerate Your Enterprise Private Cloud Initiative

Joint Federated Assurance Center (JFAC): 2018 Update. What Is the JFAC?

Transformation in Technology Barbara Duck Chief Information Officer. Investor Day 2018

Position Description. Computer Network Defence (CND) Analyst. GCSB mission and values. Our mission. Our values UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Facility Restoration and Modernization - T&E

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Mission Aware Cybersecurity

Integrated C4isr and Cyber Solutions

OUR VISION To be a global leader of computing research in identified areas that will bring positive impact to the lives of citizens and society.

AMRDEC CYBER Capabilities

HOLISTIC NETWORK PROTECTION: INNOVATIONS IN SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKS

Applying User Centered Design in the Development of Systems without User Interfaces

Space Cyber: An Aerospace Perspective

2 nd Cybersecurity Workshop Test and Evaluation to Meet the Advanced Persistent Threat

Systems 2020 Strategic Initiative Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE K: Long-Haul Communications - DCS

Systems Engineering Division

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2000

Overview. A fact sheet from Feb 2015

CERT Overview. Jeffrey J. Carpenter 2008 Carnegie Mellon University

Incident Response Services to Help You Prepare for and Quickly Respond to Security Incidents

TEL2813/IS2621 Security Management

Shaping the Department of Defense Engineering Workforce

IT Town Hall Meeting. IT Town Hall - October 6,

STRENGTHENING THE CYBERSECURITY OF FEDERAL NETWORKS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Transform your video services with a cloud platform: Succeed in a fragmented marketplace

Section One of the Order: The Cybersecurity of Federal Networks.

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Lightweight Torpedo Development

Advanced Technology Academic Research Council Federal CISO Summit. Ms. Thérèse Firmin

Engineering Your Software For Attack

Your Challenge. Our Priority.

Chapter X Security Performance Metrics

Chapter X Security Performance Metrics

Cyber Defense Maturity Scorecard DEFINING CYBERSECURITY MATURITY ACROSS KEY DOMAINS

SYMANTEC: SECURITY ADVISORY SERVICES. Symantec Security Advisory Services The World Leader in Information Security

Symantec Data Center Transformation

Transcription:

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 2: COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Complete Total Program Element - - 11.106 9.156-9.156 9.158 9.325 9.857 10.682 Continuing Continuing P278: Software Engineering # The OCO Request will be submitted at a later date. - - 11.106 9.156-9.156 9.158 9.325 9.857 10.682 Continuing Continuing Note To ensure that the Department of Defense (DoD) retains a differential advantage over potential adversaries, the Department split funding for Defense-wide software research at the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) across two program elements (PEs): this new Budget Activity (BA) 2 PE 0602751D8Z and the continuing BA 3 PE 0603781D8Z. The goals are to address both longer-term challenges in software technology and engineering (PE 0602751D8Z) and to continue to benefit from the proven experience the SEI FFRDC has with developing and transitioning advanced technology (PE 0603781D8Z). A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Software is key to meeting the DoD s increasing demand for high-quality, affordable, and timely national defense systems. With growing global parity in software engineering, the DoD must maintain leadership to avoid strategic surprise. To assist the DoD in retaining a long-term differential advantage over potential adversaries, the SEI PE will develop and evaluate the feasibility and practicality of software and computer science concepts with the potential to improve future DoD systems. This PE represents a pivot toward more fundamental research that will enable the DoD to address longer-term challenges in software technology and engineering. The SEI PE will fund the SEI Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) as the leading DoD center for addressing these longer term challenges. The SEI PE will bolster the organic research at the SEI FFRDC, enable stronger collaborations between the SEI FFRDC and academia, attract top researchers to the SEI, give DoD access to top experts in information science, and generally enhance the DoD s ability to benefit from the military applications of research in software and computer science. Total Cost Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #24

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 2: B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO Total Previous President's Budget - 11.107 11.330-11.330 Current President's Budget - 11.106 9.156-9.156 Total Adjustments - -0.001-2.174 - -2.174 Congressional General Reductions - - Congressional Directed Reductions - - Congressional Rescissions - - Congressional Adds - - Congressional Directed Transfers - - Reprogrammings - - SBIR/STTR Transfer - - FFRDC Adjustments - -0.001 - - - Strategic Efficiency Savings - - -2.174 - -2.174 Change Summary Explanation The reduction is a strategic efficiency approach to reduce funding and staffing. As a result, we provide a better alignment of funding and provide support to a smaller military force. Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 2 of 6 R-1 Line #24

COST ($ in Millions) P278: Software Engineering Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # The OCO Request will be submitted at a later date. OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 3 of 6 R-1 Line #24 Complete - - 11.106 9.156-9.156 9.158 9.325 9.857 10.682 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Software is key to meeting the Department of Defense s (DoD s) increasing demand for high-quality, affordable, and timely national defense systems. With growing global parity in software engineering, the DoD must maintain leadership to avoid strategic surprise. To assist the DoD in retaining a long-term differential advantage over potential adversaries, the Software Engineering Program Element (PE) seeks to establish a program of applied research that will develop and evaluate the feasibility and practicality of software and computer science concepts with the potential to improve future DoD systems. The SEI PE will initially have four main research thrusts: (1) measurement techniques for the effectiveness of software technologies and methods; (2) design principles and tools for evolvable, scalable ecosystems; (3) models of computational behaviors; and (4) cyber-tradecraft and analytics. These thrusts have known military applications and can be associated with active areas of basic research. The SEI PE seeks to translate this promising basic research into solutions for broadly defined military needs. This PE will leverage the expertise of the SEI Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) in advanced technology development and technology transition to design, develop, and improve tools, prototypes, and new processes that meet general requirements for software-intensive DoD systems. The SEI PE will also conduct research in multicore computing, architecture-led iterative incremental development (Agile at scale); and emerging software and computer science areas that can act as catalysts for acquiring DoD systems with improved performance. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 Title: Software Engineering Institute Description: Research projects at the SEI FFRDC will be awarded under this PE on a competitive basis across the SEI. Funding levels in each thrust area may vary from year to year. Research will address the goal of assisting the DoD to retain a long-term differential advantage over potential adversaries in the area of software-intensive systems. The four main thrust areas are: 1) Measurement techniques for the effectiveness of software technologies and methods. Modern tools, integrated development environments, and software engineering processes have captured large data sets about development activities. This thrust seeks to study the metrics that affect cost, schedule, quality, and performance based on real-world observation and experiment. 2) Design principles and tools for evolvable, scalable ecosystems. The commercial world has many successful examples of software ecosystems, but the DoD has not capitalized on these to the same extent. This thrust looks beyond implementing Total Cost - 11.106 9.156

Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 4 of 6 R-1 Line #24 B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 ecosystems in a DoD context and seeks to implement the underlying principles in a way that makes automated creation, evolution, and scaling of ecosystems easier. 3) Models of Computational Behaviors. System performance depends on end-to-end models of computational behavior that include the user, architecture, source and object code, firmware components, and processor hardware. This thrust seeks to study emerging ideas that better model end-to-end computational behavior. 4) Cyber-tradecraft and analytics. Cyberwarfare is an increasingly important and rapidly evolving dimension on the modern battlefield. This thrust seeks to investigate methods that will give the DoD enduring advantages in the cyber battlespace such as reverse software engineering, automated code & malware analysis, code-level software resiliency (e.g., randomizing and time variant techniques), and other techniques such as those found in the Software Security Assurance State-of-the-Art Report. The SEI PE will also conduct research in multicore computing, architecture-led iterative incremental development (Agile at scale); and emerging software and computer science areas that can act as catalysts for acquiring DoD systems with improved performance. FY 2014 Plans: Make competitive awards within the SEI for novel research. Begin research on measurement techniques for the effectiveness of software technologies and methods. This effort creates an applied research component to complement the measurable analysis of value-driven incremental development started under the SEI PE (0603781D8Z). Begin research on assurance-at-scale. This effort creates an applied research component to complement work started under the SEI PE (0603781D8Z). Begin research on quality-attribute analyses for high-confidence timing of multicore software systems with greater scalability. This effort creates an applied research component to complement work started under the SEI PE (0603781D8Z). Begin research on the design principles and tools for evolvable, scalable ecosystems. Advance research on measurement techniques for measuring the effectiveness of software technologies and methods. Begin research on models of computational behaviors. Develop advanced analytics techniques for identified patterns, trends, and indicators in the software and systems vulnerability and exploitation ecosystem. Explore concepts in 'counter-analytics' for building more understanding bias and robustness of analytic techniques. Develop specific insider threat mitigations that form an architectural foundation for next-generation DoD enterprise systems and technologies Develop approaches and techniques to discover vulnerabilities automatically in compiled applications

B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 Develop generalized techniques for vulnerability discovery in low-power, low-bandwidth networked systems Develop malware analysis techniques aimed at improving scalability and enabling correlation with network analysis Investigate the integration of architecture fault model framework with confidence maps for incremental qualification and certifications of safety-critical cyber-physical DoD systems. Extend the architecture, algorithms, and prototypes that support rapid analysis of social networks; rapidly-deployable and scalable autonomous sensor networks; and the mobile component strategy to other scenarios and environments. Plans: Improve software security throughout the entire DoD supply chain by improving the security of programming language standards. Investigate and improve approaches to the detection and quantification of cyber threats to the DoD. Research the capabilities of various operating systems to understand how to better integrate Insider Threat controls and monitoring such that it is transparent to users, and low maintenance for administrators. Continue research on measurement techniques for the effectiveness of software technologies and methods. Continue investigation of the integration of the architecture fault model framework with confidence maps for incremental qualification and certifications of safety-critical software-reliant DoD systems. Develop quality-attribute analyses for distributed, autonomous cyber-physical systems to ensure correctness of timing, functionality, and distributed coordination of the computational and physically-related aspects of DoD systems. Extend the architecture, algorithms, and prototypes that support rapid analysis of social networks to include voice, image and video data; rapidly-deployable and scalable autonomous sensor networks; and the mobile component strategy to other scenarios and environments. Extend work in group-context-awareness to include additional sensors and more sophisticated context models in support of new scenarios and environments. Extend work in cloudlets to create a federated cloudlet capability. Continue early lifecycle cost estimation research for pre-milestone A decisions. Integrate architecture-level dependency metrics and rework analysis with architecture fault model framework to characterize technical debt in certification of safety-critical software-reliant DoD systems. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals - 11.106 9.156 C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Complete Total Cost BA 3, PE# 0603781D8Z: Software Engineering Institute (SEI) 28.619 19.006 15.776-15.776 15.778 15.799 16.292 16.792 Continuing Continuing Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 5 of 6 R-1 Line #24

C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Complete Total Cost Remarks Together with PE 0603781D8Z, Software Engineering Institute (SEI), the SEI PE represents a pivot toward more fundamental research that will enable the DoD to address longer-term challenges in software technology and engineering. The SEI PE will fund the SEI FFRDC as the leading DoD center for addressing these longer term challenges. The SEI PE will bolster the organic research at the SEI FFRDC, enable stronger collaborations between the SEI FFRDC and academia, attract top researchers to the SEI, and generally enhance the DoD s ability to benefit from the military applications of research in software and computer science. D. Acquisition Strategy N/A E. Performance Metrics Transition of tools, methods, and practices for use in DoD technology development programs and programs of record. Transition of tools, methods, and practices to the Defense Industrial to support DoD technology development programs and programs of record. Number of citations in peer reviewed journals and reports. Number of external research collaborations and interactions with the broader software and computer science community. Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 6 of 6 R-1 Line #24