ERO Enterprise Registration Practice Guide: Distribution Provider directly connected Determinations Version 2: July 5, 2018

Similar documents
Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber As s et Identification

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber As s et Identification

NERC Relay Loadability Standard Reliability Standards Webinar November 23, 2010

2017 MRO Performance Areas and an Update on Inherent Risk Assessments

CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification. Rationale and Implementation Reference Document

Standard Development Timeline

Disclaimer Executive Summary Introduction Overall Application of Attachment Generation Transmission...

Standard Development Timeline

Standard Development Timeline

Bulk Electric System Definition Changes and Reporting

NB Appendix CIP NB-0 - Cyber Security Recovery Plans for BES Cyber Systems

NB Appendix CIP NB-0 - Cyber Security Personnel & Training

CIP Cyber Security Systems Security Management

DRAFT Reliability Standard Audit Worksheet 1

This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective.

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments

DRAFT. Cyber Security Communications between Control Centers. March May Technical Rationale and Justification for Reliability Standard CIP-012-1

requirements in a NERC or Regional Reliability Standard.

Impacts and Implementation: NERC Reliability Standards, Compliance Initiatives, and Regulatory Activities

CIP Cyber Security Personnel & Training

A. Introduction 1. Title: 2. Number: 3. Purpose: 4. Applicability: 4.1. Functional Entities: Balancing Authority Distribution Provider

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments

Standard Development Timeline

Project Retirement of Reliability Standard Requirements

RELIABILITY OF THE BULK POWER SYSTEM

Reliability Standard Audit Worksheet 1

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments

CIP Cyber Security Personnel & Training

Draft CIP Standards Version 5

CIP Cyber Security Recovery Plans for BES Cyber Systems

CIP Cyber Security Recovery Plans for BES Cyber Systems

New Brunswick 2018 Annual Implementation Plan Version 1

CIP Cyber Security Information Protection

Unofficial Comment Form 1st Draft of PRC-005-3: Protection System and Automatic Reclosing Maintenance (Project )

CIP Cyber Security Incident Reporting and Response Planning

A. Introduction. Page 1 of 22

requirements in a NERC or Regional Reliability Standard.

CIP Cyber Security Physical Security of BES Cyber Systems

CIP Cyber Security Security Management Controls. A. Introduction

Standards Authorization Request Form

Reliability Standard Audit Worksheet 1

CIP Cyber Security Recovery Plans for BES Cyber Systems

CIP Cyber Security Security Management Controls. Standard Development Timeline

Standards Authorization Request Form

Cyber Security Reliability Standards CIP V5 Transition Guidance:

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification

Standard Development Timeline

4.1.1 Generator Owner Transmission Owner that owns synchronous condenser(s)

1. SAR posted for comment on January 15, Standard Drafting Team appointed on January 29, 2014

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification

Physical Security Reliability Standard Implementation

SOUTH TEXAS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.

This draft standard is being posted for an initial comment and ballot. The draft includes modifications to meet the directives of FERC Order No. 791.

151 FERC 61,066 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER DENYING REHEARING. (Issued April 23, 2015)

CIP Cyber Security Electronic Security Perimeter(s)

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Supplemental Information

Purpose. ERO Enterprise-Endorsed Implementation Guidance

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability AssessmentsManagement

CIP Standards Development Overview

Table of Issues and Directives Project Relay Loadability: Stable Power Swings

Unofficial Comment Form

Standard Development Timeline

CIP Cyber Security Systems Security Management

Standard CIP 005 4a Cyber Security Electronic Security Perimeter(s)

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Management and Vulnerability Assessments

Certification Program

Standard Development Timeline

Title. Critical Infrastructure Protection Getting Low with a Touch of Medium. CanWEA Operations and Maintenance Summit 2018.

A. Introduction. B. Requirements and Measures

Utility Interconnection. Highlights of the New Fast Track Process Proposed by FERC and Changes to IEEE 1547

Standard Development Timeline

Implementation Plan for COM-001-2

Standard CIP 007 3a Cyber Security Systems Security Management

Project Consideration of Commission Directives in Order No. 693

NERC Request for Data or Information: Protection System Misoperation Data Collection August 14, 2014

Critical Asset Identification Methodology. William E. McEvoy Northeast Utilities

Additional 45-Day Comment Period September Final Ballot is Conducted October/November Board of Trustees (Board) Adoption November 2014

Reliability Standard Audit Worksheet 1

4.1.1 Generator Owner Transmission Owner that owns synchronous condenser(s)

Registration & Certification Update

Consideration of Issues and Directives Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Order No. 791 June 2, 2014

Critical Cyber Asset Identification Security Management Controls

CIP Cyber Security Physical Security of BES Cyber Systems

Standard Development Timeline

WECC Criterion MOD-(11 and 13)-WECC-CRT-1.1

Standard CIP 007 4a Cyber Security Systems Security Management

Project Posting 8 Frequently Asked Questions Guide

October 2, CIP-014 Report Physical Security Protection for High Impact Control Centers Docket No. RM15-14-

CIP Cyber Security Security Management Controls

Grid Interconnection of Renewable Generation

Order No Assessment of Protection System Single Points of Failure Based on the Section 1600 Data Request. September, 2015

REAL-TIME MONITORING DATA SPECIFICATION

136 FERC 61,187 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Parts and 40. [Docket No. RM ]

Warrenton Wheeler Gainesville 230kV Reliability Project

Consideration of Issues and Directives Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Order No. 791 January 23, 2015

CIP Cyber Security Physical Security of BES Cyber Systems

Standard CIP Cyber Security Systems Security Management

Standard CIP Cyber Security Security Management Controls

Transcription:

ERO Enterprise Registration Practice Guide: Distribution Provider directly connected Determinations Version 2: July 5, 2018 Purpose The purpose of this Practice Guide is provide a reference to be used by Regional Entity (RE) and NERC staff when reviewing registration applications for the Distribution Provider (DP) function that specifically pertain to directly connected determinations. The intent of the Practice Guide is to facilitate a consistent application of the DP criteria 1 across the ERO Enterprise (ERO) with emphasis on determining the DP system and load that is directly connected to the [Bulk Electric System] (BES). Background On March 19, 2015, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order approving proposed revisions to NERC s Rules of Procedure (ROP) to implement the Risk Based Registration (RBR) initiative. One of the approved RBR revisions was to the DP criteria. The DP criteria, in ROP Appendix B, Section III., was revised to the following, excluding footnotes: III.a.1 Distribution Provider system serving >75 MW of peak that is directly connected to the BES; or III.a.2 Distribution Provider is the responsible entity that owns, controls, or operates Facilities that are part of any of the following Protection Systems or programs designed, installed, and operated for the protection of the BES: a required Undervoltage Shedding (UVLS) program and/or a required Special Protection System or Remedial Action Scheme and/or a required transmission Protection System; or III.a.3 Distribution Provider that is responsible for providing services related to Nuclear Plant Interface Requirements (NPIRs) pursuant to an executed agreement; or III.a.4 Distribution Provider with field switching personnel identified as performing unique tasks associated with the Transmission Operator s restoration plan that are outside of their normal tasks. As applicable here, section III.a.1 of the criteria was changed in two areas. The first area increased the amount of peak load served by the DP system from 25 MW to 75 MW. The second area changed the connection point from peak load that is directly connected to the Bulk Power System (BPS) to peak load that is directly connected to the BES. 1 The DP criteria is located in the NERC Rules of Procedure, Appendix 5B, Statement of Compliance Registry, Section III, @ http://www.nerc.com/filingsorders/us/ruleofproceduredl/appendix_5b_registrationcriteria_20161031.pdf.

Prior to the RBR revisions, the scope of what was considered the BPS 2 was broadly interpreted and as a result the use of the term directly connected did not usually result in varying applications of the DP criteria. Subsequent to RBR, in combination with the ruling in the South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Association (SLECA) Registration Appeal (Docket No. RC13-4-000) 3, has resulted in varying interpretations of the DP criteria across the ERO. Distribution Provider Reference The definition of the DP function as stated in the ROP 4 is the following: Provides and operates the wires between the transmission system and the end-use customer. For those end-use customers who are served at transmission voltages, the Transmission Owner also serves as the Distribution Provider. Thus the Distribution Provider is not defined by a specific voltage, but rather as performing the distribution function at any voltage. As explained further below, the DP criteria applicable here involves evaluating whether a system serving >75 MW of peak is directly connected to the BES. The point where the system transitions from a transmission to distribution function is the start of the distribution system or the wires between the transmission system and the end-use customer. This transition occurs where non-bes elements such as radial transmission lines, local networks and step-down transformers connect to the BES. These non-bes elements are distribution system elements that are directly connected to the BES. Therefore, for registration purposes, the owners of these non-bes elements are candidates for DP registration due to ownership of a distribution system that is directly connected to the BES. Only the entity that owns the non-bes elements that are directly connected to the BES will be considered for DP registration. An entity that owns distribution facilities that are connected to a non-bes element would not be a candidate for DP registration because their distribution system is connected to the non-bes and not directly connected to the BES 5. Furthermore, as stated above, the DP criteria requires the distribution system serve greater than 75MW. Distribution system load will be aggregated at each BES transition point. When determining the load fed from each BES transition point, the DP system should be in its normal state with switching devices, such as normally open tie switches, in their expected positions under typical peak load conditions. For registration purposes, each distribution system will be evaluated on the basis of the loading at each BES transition point. Distribution system load will not be aggregated at more than one BES transition point for 2 From the NERC Glossary of Terms @ http://www.nerc.com/pa/stand/glossary%20of%20terms/glossary_of_terms.pdf; Bulk-Power System: (A) facilities and control systems necessary for operating an interconnected electric energy transmission network (or any portion thereof); and (B) electric energy from generation facilities needed to maintain transmission system reliability. The term does not include facilities used in the local distribution of electric energy. (Note that the terms Bulk-Power System or Bulk Power System shall have the same meaning.) 3 Available at https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2013/071813/e-9.pdf 4 The DP definition is located in the NERC Rules of Procedure, Appendix 5B, Statement of Compliance Registry, Section II, @ http://www.nerc.com/filingsorders/us/ruleofproceduredl/appendix_5b_registrationcriteria_20161031.pdf. 5 This is consistent with FERC s determination in South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Association, 144 FERC 61,050, reh g denied, 145 FERC 61,232, P 34 (2013) (stating, If, as the Commission determined, the facilities within the Landry substation into which SLECA s facilities connect are radial, the directly connected registry criterion is not satisfied. ) Distribution Provider Practice Guide for directly connected Determinations 2

systems with a single point of connection to the BES. If the system being evaluated has more than one connection to the BES, such as a local network, or other networked configurations, then the total load served by the network is considered. Directly Connected Determination The following steps are used to make the determination of which entities are candidates for DP registration based on Section III.a.1 of the DP criteria: 1) Identify the BES to non-bes connection points a. This occurs at locations where there are electrical connections between BES Elements and non-bes Elements. 6 2) If there is a radial system that meets BES Exclusion E1 at the BES transition point, then the radial system and all of the load supplied by the radial system is considered directly connected to the BES. a. Radial systems have a single point of connection to the BES. b. The total peak load served by the radial system is aggregated, including load served by downstream transformers. If the total peak load is greater than 75MW, the owner and operator of the radial facilities at the BES connection point is a candidate for DP registration. 3) If there is a network at the BES transition point, including local networks that meet BES Exclusion E3 or other networked configurations, then the network and all of the load served by the network is considered directly connected to the BES. a. Networks have multiple points of connection to the BES. b. The total peak load served from each point of connection to the BES is aggregated, including load served by downstream transformers. If the total peak load is greater than 75MW, the owner and operator of the network at the BES connection points is a candidate for DP registration. 6 Non-BES elements that connect to the BES include transmission lines or transformers that do not have the primary terminal and at least one secondary terminal operated at greater than 100kV (per BES Inclusion I1). Distribution Provider Practice Guide for directly connected Determinations 3

Attachments: Single Line Diagrams of Directly Connected Configurations Figure 1 Radial System Figure 2 Two Radial Systems Figure 3 Local Network Figure 4 Networked Configuration Figure 5 Local Network with Embedded UFLS-Only System Key to diagram color coding: Blue indicates that an Element is included in the BES Green indicates that an Element is not included in the BES Orange indicates points of connection Black indicates Elements that are not evaluated for the specific exclusion depicted in the individual diagrams being shown Version History Version Date Action Change Tracking 1 January 3, 2018 Final Distribution Provider Reference Document for directly connected Determinations New 2 July 5, 2018 Added key to diagram color coding for single line diagrams. Revised language to clarify that (1) the guide only applies to section III.a.1. of Appendix B of the ROP, and (2) the 75 MW threshold is considered when evaluating whether a DP is directly connected to the BES. Revision Distribution Provider Practice Guide for directly connected Determinations 4

Figure 1 - Radial System This figure depicts a radial system at the BES to non-bes connection point, therefore, the radial system and all of the load supplied by the radial system is considered directly connected to the BES. BES to non-bes Connection Point: Single point of connection to the BES (Radial System). The owner of these non-bes elements (Radial System) is a candidate for Distribution Provider (DP) registration due to: The radial system having a single point of connection to the BES. The total peak load served by the radial system is greater than 75 MW (Actual 50 MW + 30 MW = 80 MW), the owner of the radial system is a candidate for DP registration. * * (50 MW (30 MW * Note: The facilities are not considered to be directly connected to the BES based on the points of connection being at non-bes Elements (i.e., distribution transformers). The owner of the facilities, if different from the radial system owner, is NOT a candidate for registration as a Distribution Provider (DP) due to the facilities NOT being directly connected to the BES.

Figure 2 - Two Radial Systems This figure depicts two separate Radial Systems as defined by application of Exclusion E1 of the Bulk Electric System (BES) definition. The operating voltage of the underlying networked configuration () allows for the application of the radial exclusion. The individual Radial Systems define the BES to non-bes connection points, therefore, the individual Radial Systems and the load supplied by each Radial System is considered directly connected to the BES. (45 MW BES to non-bes Connection Point: Single point of connection to the BES (Radial System). BES to non-bes Connection Point: Single point of connection to the BES (Radial System). (80 MW 5 MVA The owner of these non-bes elements (Radial System) is NOT a candidate for Distribution Provider (DP) registration due to: The total peak load served by the radial system is less than 75 MW (Actual 45 MW). The owner of these non-bes elements (Radial System) is a candidate for Distribution Provider (DP) registration due to: The radial system having a single point of connection to the BES. The total peak load served by the radial system is greater than 75 MW (Actual 80 MW).

Figure 3 - Local Network This figure depicts a Local Network as defined by application of Exclusion E3 of the Bulk Electric System (BES) definition. The Local Network defines the BES to non-bes connection points, therefore, the Local Network and all of the load supplied by the network is considered directly connected to the BES. (65 MW BES to non-bes Connection Points: Multiple points of connection to the BES (Local Network). (45 MW 5 MVA The owner of non-bes elements (Local Network) at the BES to non-bes Connection Points is a candidate for DP registration due to: The Local Network having multiple points of connection to the BES. The total peak load served by the Local Network is greater than 75 MW (Actual 65 MW + 45 MW= 110 MW),

Figure 4 - Networked Configuration This figure depicts a networked configuration at the BES to non-bes connection points, therefore, the networked configuration and all of the load supplied by the network is considered directly connected to the BES. BES to non-bes Connection Points: Multiple points of connection to the BES (Networked Configuration). (25 MW 5 MVA (30 MW (40 MW The owner of the non-bes elements (network configuration) at the BES to non-bes Connection Points is a candidate for DP registration due to: The networked configuration having multiple points of connection to the BES. The total peak load served by the networked configuration system is greater than 75 MW (Actual 25 MW + 30 MW + 40 MW= 95 MW).

Figure 5 - Local Network with Embedded UFLS-Only System This figure depicts a Local Network as defined by application of Exclusion E3 of the Bulk Electric System (BES) definition. The Local Network defines the BES to non-bes connection points, therefore, the Local Network and all of the load supplied by the network is considered directly connected to the BES. (45 MW BES to non-bes Connection Points: Multiple points of connection to the BES (Local Network). (25 MW The owner of non-bes elements (Local Network) at the BES to non-bes Connection Points is NOT a candidate for DP registration due to: The total peak load served by the Local Network is less than 75 MW (Actual 45 MW + 25 MW= 70 MW), 5 MVA DP-UFLS Only System The owner of the embedded 13.2 kv distribution system is a candidate for registration as a Distribution Provider UFLS Only due to: Not meeting any of the other registration criteria for a Distribution Provider, and Is the responsible entity that owns, controls, or operates UFLS Protection System(s) needed to implement a required UFLS Program designed for the protection of the BES.