Bifacial PV Performance Models: Comparison and Field Results

Similar documents
Single-Axis Tracked Bifacial System Results

BIFACIAL VS SILICON MODULES ON GENIUS TRACKER

Realistic Yield Expectations for Bifacial PV Systems an Assessment of Announced, Predicted and Observed Benefits

A Detailed Model of Rear-Side Irradiance for Bifacial PV Modules

Application Note - How to Simulate a SolarEdge System in PVsyst

New Features in PVsyst

Recommended Practices for PV Module Outdoor Characterization and Power Rating

High-resolution spatial and electrical modeling for efficient BIPV system design

MODELLING OF BIFACIAL GAIN FOR STAND-ALONE AND IN-FIELD INSTALLED BIFACIAL PV MODULES

Modelling of Single-axis tracking, applications to HET and IBC modules

IEC : Measurement of current-voltage characteristics of bifacial photovoltaic devices

Development of an optical model for simulating energy yield of a bifacial PV array

Copyright 2015, First Solar, Inc.

DETAILED MODELING OF COMPLEX BIPV SYSTEMS

CHARACTERIZATION OF BIFACIAL SILICON SOLAR CELLS AND MODULES: A NEW STEP

Photovoltaic Shading Testbed for Module-Level Power Electronics: 2016 Performance Data Update

Assessing combined object and mutual shading on the performance of a solar field

Bifacial Module Certification Requirements

Field data requirements for the validation of PV module performance models

Using RADIANCE for Right-to-Light and Solar Access Studies

Module Shading Guide. Field Shading Guide and Avoiding Device Damage

Mobile: web:

HIGH RESOLUTION SHADING MODELING AND PERFORMANCE SIMULATION OF SUNTRACKING PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS

Energy Yield Model for Bifacial PV Systems: A study and analysis of temperature & rear irradiance models.

INTEGRATED BUILDING ENERGY AND LIGHTING SIMULATION IN THE FRAMEWORK OF EU PV LIGHT PROJECT

Effect of Tilt angle and Azimuth angle on Solar Output and Optimum Tilt and Azimuth angle for Chandigarh, India

OPTIMIZING YOUR ENERGY YIELD. TrueCapture Smart Control Technology Boosts Energy Production and Financial Returns. By Allan Daly and Venkata Abbaraju

BEAM TILTED CORRELATIONS. Frank Vignola Department of Physics University of Oregon Eugene, OR

ILLUMINATION HOMOGENEITY OF BIFACIAL SYSTEMS OUTDOOR MEASUREMENTS WITH SYSTEMATICALLY VARIED INSTALLATION CONDITIONS

CALIBRATION PROCEDURES STATE OF THE ART

Application Note How to simulate SolarEdge power optimizers connected to a non-solaredge inverter in PVsyst

Daysim 3.0 DDS, New Validation Study

Modeling reflected irradiance in urban environments a case study for simulation-based measurement quality control for an outdoor PV test site

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF FIXED, SINGLE, AND DUAL AXIS TRACKING SYSTEMS FOR SMALL PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS WITH MEASURED DIRECT BEAM FRACTION

EVALUATION OF OVERHEATING PROTECTION WITH SUN-SHADING SYSTEMS

What is hidden in the monitoring data? A stamp collection plotting approach

AIR-CONDITIONING ENERGY REDUCTION THROUGH A BUILDING SHAPE OPTIMIZATION

29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference Amsterdam, Netherlands, September 2014

Bifacial PV cell with reflector for stand-alone mast for sensor powering purposes

CPV STANDARDS: UPDATE OF THE CURRENT TESTING STANDARDS AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

Field Logic, Inc. Standard Mode Power Generation Calculation Field Logic, Inc. Version 1.0

Bird Solar Model Source Creator

EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECT RE-VIS, DAYLIGHTING PRODUCTS WITH REDIRECTING VISUAL PROPERTIES

Determining the causes and rates of PV degradation using the Loss Factors Model (LFM) with high quality IV measurements

A SIMPLE METHOD OF DETERMINING THE INFLUENCE OF THE OVERHANG ON WINDOW SOLAR GAINS

Radiance workshop 2012

Application Note Recommended Parametric Descriptions of First Solar Series 4 (V3) PV Modules for Use with PVSYST

Evaluating solar irradiance on urban sites by superimposing Radiance pictures

Municipal Projects in Cambridge Using a LiDAR Dataset. NEURISA Day 2012 Sturbridge, MA

The importance of software's and weather file's choice in dynamic daylight simulations

Mission Solar Energy Product Models

BUILDING INTEGRATED PHOTOVOLTAICS IN A THERMAL BUILDING SIMULATION TOOL

HelioScope: Mathematical Formulation

How to use the new TracePro Solar Utility for comprehensive solar calculations

Mission Solar Energy Product Models

The JSON Data Schema That Encodes Energy3D Design Processes

A COMPREHENSIVE MONITORING SYSTEM FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAYS

Evaluation of simulation methods and optimal installation conditions for bifacial PV modules

ARCH 447 Electrical Services - Lighting

Dynamic daylight simulations for façade optimization (and some other applications)

IMPROVING THE ACCURACY OF LOW COST MEASUREMENT OF DIRECT NORMAL SOLAR IRRADIANCE

Project Update on PV AFCI, PV Plastics, US Adoption of IEC 61730

SunCast - User Guide. IES Virtual Environment 2013

SAMPLING!OF!BUILDING!SURFACES!TOWARDS!AN!EARLY!ASSESSMENT! OF!BIPV!POTENTIAL!IN!URBAN!CONTEXTS!

Keywords: Photovoltaic modeling; partial shading; inter-row shading; annual performance model;

Photovoltaic Module Performance and Thermal Characterizations: Data Collection and Automation of Data Processing. Kartheek Koka

VALIDATION OF A SIMPLIFIED PV SIMULATION ENGINE

UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY. Photovoltaic Array and Shading Loss Simulation for the. Optimization of Solar Tracking PV Farms. Kenneth Alexander Anderson

Índice. Índice 2 1 Installation 4

urban context Darren Robinson Group Leader: Sustainable Urban Development / EPFL Visiting Professor: Technical Research Centre of Finland / VTT

Empirical Validation of IES<VE> Simulation in Term of Daylight in Self- Shading Office Room in Malaysia

Solar Panel Irradiation Exposure efficiency of solar panels with shadow

5.1 Exercise: Daylighting Analysis of a Single Office

J. Alstan Jakubiec Jeff Neimasz Modeling Dynamic Shading Devices with the DIVA Advanced Shading Module 1 / 30

An evaluation method of PV systems

Removing Systematic Errors from Rotating Shadowband Pyranometer Data

Model of Photovoltaic Generation During Cloudy Days

Helios 3D TM Product Sheet

MACHINE VISION AS A METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING SOLAR TRACKER PERFORMANCE

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 77 (2015 )

Plane Wave Imaging Using Phased Array Arno Volker 1

Yield Reduction Due to Shading:

Table of Contents

REALISTIC PV PERFORMANCE VALUES OBTAINED BY A NUMBER OF GRID-CONNECTED SYSTEMS IN JAPAN

Practical use of new visual discomfort probability index in the control strategy for solar shading devices Johnsen, Kjeld

June 19, 2013 PVMC SDO

Complex Fenestra/on Thermal Transmission Valida/on. Radiance Workshop 2017 Robert Hart Lawrence Berkeley Na=onal Lab

Microgrid Design Toolkit (MDT)

Daysim and Photonmapping Jan Wienold

International PV Quality Assurance Task Force

IECRE Certification for PV Systems

IR-Signature of the MULDICON Configuration Determined by the IR-Signature Model MIRA

Presented at the 32nd European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, June 2016, Munich, Germany

Why Modules bought anonymously on the Market should be tested in Addition to IEC Certification?

Development and Validation of a Radiance model for a Translucent Panel

Daylighting. Note: Daylight is typically defined as diffuse light and is very different from sunlight (direct solar radiation).

Instituto de Sistemas Fotovoltaicos de Concentración

EvalDRC: a new, versatile frontend for climate-based daylight assessment with Contribution Photon Mapping

INCREASING QUALITY AND TIME RESOLUTION OF SATELLITE-DERIVED SOLAR IRRADIANCE TIME-SERIES USING APPROPRIATE SHORT TERM GROUND STATION DATA.

Shading Calculation for Passive House Certification Discussion and Development of a New Method

Transcription:

Bifacial PV Performance Models: Comparison and Field Results Chris Deline, B. Marion, S. MacAlpine (NREL) J. Stein (SNL), F. Toor (U. Iowa), S. Ayala (U. Ariz.) BiFiPV 2017 Workshop Konstanz Germany October 26, 2017

Outline Project overview Rear irradiance models Field validation Edge effects Irradiance nonuniformity NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 2

3-Yr Bifacial Research Project (2016-2018) Collaborative project between Sandia, NREL and University of Iowa (pvpmc.sandia.gov/pv-research/bifacial-pv-project/) Task 1: Measure Outdoor Bifacial Performance Module scale o o o Adjustable rack IV curves (height, tilt, albedo, and backside shading effects) Spatial variability in backside irradiance Effects of backside obstructions String scale o o o Fixed tilt rack (tilt, mismatch effects) Single axis tracker (investigate potential) Two-axis tracker System scale o String level monitoring on commercial systems (validation data) Stein, J. S., D. Riley, M. Lave, C. Deline, F. Toor and C. Hansen (2017). Outdoor Field Performance of Bifacial PV Modules and Systems. 33rd European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition. Amsterdam, Netherlands. SAND2017-10254 NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 3

3-Yr Bifacial Research Project (2016-2018) Task 2: Develop Performance Models Ray Tracing simulation Bifacial_Radiance software release github.com/cdeline/bifacial_radiance Configuration analysis publication 1 o o Effect of row spacing, tilt optimization Validation of model using Sandia field data View Factor model BifacialVF software release github.com/cdeline/bifacialvf Method publication 2 o o Model detail and configuration Validation of model using NREL field data Screenshot Bifacial_Radiance software Integration with SAM software scheduled 2018 View Factor ground reflection geometry 1 A. Asgharzadeh et al, Analysis of the impact of installation parameters and system size on bifacial gain and energy yield of PV systems, IEEE PVSC 2017 2 B. Marion et al., A Practical Irradiance Model for Bifacial PV Modules, IEEE PVSC 2017. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67847.pdf NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 4

Radiance CumulativeSky pre-processor Typical ray-tracing approach: use Perez model to generate hourly sky description o Runtime = hours for annual simulations CumulativeSky approach: sum annual hourly irradiance into 145 sky patches o Runtime = seconds for annual simulation. Single hourly Perez sky (W/m 2 ) Annual cumulative sky conditions (kwh/m 2 ) Robinson, Stone Irradiation modelling made simple: the cumulative sky approach 2004 NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 5

Modeling Rear Irradiance parameters to consider Image: http://opsun.com/mounting-solutions/flat-roof/bifacial-pv-racking/ Albedo Clearance Size of array / simulation Location Weather Sky Diffuse Model Tilt Others: Spacing between cells Shade obstructions NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 6

Bifacial Gain Calculation Our focus today * V. Fakhfouri IEC TS 60904-1-2 ED1 (2017) NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 7

Industry Bifacial Models for comparison PVSyst 2D unlimited sheds bifacial model o 6.6.4 update increased bifacial response Solar World Boost Calculator web interface o Empirical model, not climate sensitive http://www.solarworld.de/fileadmin/calculator PVSyst 6.6.4 bifacial interface SolarWorld online calculator NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 8

PVSyst Bifacial rear irradiance calculation Front Irradiance Rear Irradiance NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 9

Rear irradiance (%) Model intercomparison - height 20 15 PVSyst 6.6.4 NREL RayTrace NREL VF SolarWorld 10 0 0.5 1 Module Ground Clearance (m) Low tilt high albedo rooftop application Richmond VA, 1.5m row spacing, 10 o tilt, 0.62 albedo NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 10

Rear irradiance (%) Model intercomparison row spacing 20 PVSyst 6.6.4 15 10 SolarWorld NREL RayTrace NREL VF 1 2 3 4 Row to Row pitch (m) Low tilt high albedo rooftop application Richmond VA, 0.15 m height, 10 o tilt, 0.62 albedo Not as good agreement NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 11

Field Validation: 3-row mock array Adjustable spacing, tilt, height

Field Validation: 3-row mock array Low ground clearance configuration Front & rear irradiance sensors

Mock array configuration - 4 rear, 2 forward facing irradiance Tilt= 10deg. Slant length = 610mm 1 Height = 100-500mm 0.16-0.9 Row spacing = 900-1800mm 1.5-3 Albedo = 0.62 (normalized) Compare measured with site modeled conditions NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 14

Rear irradiance Mock Array comparison with NREL models - Height 25% 20% RayTrace model (3 rows) Measured 15% View Factor model 10% 5% 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Module Ground Clearance (m) 2 months field data RayTrace model reflects finite experiment size at high ground clearance. NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 15

Rear irradiance Mock Array comparison with models Row spacing 20% 15% 10% 5% RayTrace model View Factor model Measured 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Row to Row spacing (m) OK agreement. Additional conditions under test NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 16

Rear irradiance (%) Rear irradiance (%) System Modeling Edge Effects # Modules / row 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Height = 3 m Height = 1 m Height = 0.25 m 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Landscape Modules Per Row Total # Rows 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Height = 3 m H = 1 m Height = 0.25 m 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Number of Rows Richmond VA, 1.5 m row spacing, 10 o tilt, 0.62 alb. 1m landscape module width 20 modules, 3 rows default NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 17

Rear irradiance (%) Rear irradiance (%) System Modeling Edge Effects # Modules / row 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Height = 3 m Height = 1 m * * Height = 0.25 m 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Landscape Modules Per Row * * = 1% edge effect Total # Rows 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Height = 3 m H = 1 m * * Height = 0.25 m 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Number of Rows * = 1% edge effect Richmond VA, 1.5 m row spacing, 10 o tilt, 0.62 alb. 1m landscape module width 20 modules, 3 rows default NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 18 *

Thank you! Chris Deline National Renewable Energy Laboratory chris.deline@nrel.gov github.com/cdeline www.nrel.gov This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

BACKUP SLIDES NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 21

NREL View Factor Model 1 Ground divided into n segments in row-to-row direction and shading determined for each Irradiance on each ground segment found using view of the sky (configuration factors) Rear side irradiance is sum of sky, ground reflected, object reflected components Runtime 4 seconds for annual simulation 1 B. Marion, A Practical Irradiance Model for Bifacial PV Modules, IEEE PVSC, 2017. NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 22

Ongoing work: Single-axis tracking Improvement: the view factor model has been extended to apply to bifacial tracking PV systems. Field validation is underway. NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY 23