Recommendations. A. Containers in RDA and JSC/ALA/21 August 8, 2012 page 1 of 9

Similar documents
From: Renate Behrens, European Regional Representative. Subject: Proposal on Sources of Information (RDA 2.2.2)

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA Dave Reser, LC Representative

General comments. 5JSC/RDA/Part A/Categorization/ALA response September 18, 2006 page 1 of 9. Joint Steering Committee

Background and summary of recommendations

Abstract. Background. 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/5 31 July 2015 page 1 of 205

SUBJECT: Revision to RDA (Number, date, location, of a conference, etc.)

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. Some of the proposals below (F., P., Q., and R.) were not in the original proposal.

Background. Recommendations. SAC13-ANN/11/Rev. SAC/RDA Subcommittee/2013/1 March 8, 2013; rev. July 11, 2013 page 1 of 7

Audiovisual and Electronic Media

From: Bibliographic Control Committee, Music Library Association

RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future

: Content, Media, Carrier (CMC) Types (RDA 6.9, )

Reconsidering DCRM in the light of RDA: A Discussion Paper

Association for Library Collections and Technical Services (A Division of the American Library Association) Cataloging and Classification Section

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Background and Rationale

Physical Description: MARC tag 300

SUBJECT: Language and Script instructions for Chapters 6 and 7. Related documents: 6JSC/MusicWG/13/LC response; RSC/LC/2/Appendix

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. Related document: 5JSC/RDA/Scope/Rev/4

Section 10 Managing Records in Special Formats

RDA Serials Cataloging Update

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. Related document: 5JSC/RDA/Scope/Rev

RECORD SYNTAXES FOR DESCRIPTIVE DATA

Examination Guidelines for Design (Provisional translation)

RDA? GAME ON!! A B C L A / B C C A T S P R E C O N F E R E N C E A P R I L 2 2, : : 0 0 P M

5JSC/ACOC/1/Rev 7 August Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of AACR

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. The attached document contains the guidelines followed by the Editor in drafting RDA.

173 Prices and Eligibility. 1.0 Media Mail Prices and Fees

RDA Steering Committee Kathy Glennan, ALA Representative Discussion paper: RDA and WGA treatment of aggregates

RDF representation of RDA relationship designators. Appendix 5: Issues relating to minor changes in the RDA Toolkit

Requirements Engineering

Alignment of the ISBD: International Standard Bibliographic Description element set with RDA: Resource Description & Access element set

Standards Committee, 15 June This report fulfills item 1 of the Task Force s charge:

Follett Software Company. Sagebrush InfoCentre Library Manager

6JSC/Chair/8 25 July 2013 Page 1 of 34. From: Barbara Tillett, JSC Chair To: JSC Subject: Proposals for Subject Relationships

RDA Steering Committee and RSC Working Group Chairs

Cataloging Films and Video Recordings in RDA NOTSL Spring 2012 Meeting April 27, 2012 Cuyahoga Public Library Administration Building

RDA Editor s Guide. 2.1 Chapter numbers 2.2 Section numbers. 4.1 Hyphens and dashes 4.2 Lists 4.3 Examples

RDA/ONIX Framework for Resource Categorization. Related documents: 5JSC/Chair/6/Chair follow-up and responses

APPLICATION FORM FORM C

4/26/2012. Basic differences between AACR2 and RDA AV-specific issues in cataloging under RDA MARC records cataloged under AACR2

Auditing in an Automated Environment: Appendix E: System Design, Development, and Maintenance

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information and documentation Library performance indicators

Task Force on Harmonization of ISBD(ER) and AACR2. Final Report

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. Gordon Dunsire, Chair, JSC Technical Working Group

Desktop DNA r11.1. PC DNA Management Challenges

Best Practices and Guidelines. Large Print Documents. Low Vision Community. Council of Citizens. Low Vision International

1.1 Technical Evaluation Guidelines and Checklist:

373 Prices and Eligibility

Archival Research Guide

GUIDELINES FOR CREATION AND PRESERVATION OF DIGITAL FILES

AMENDMENTS TO THE GUIDELINES FOR DRAFTING CLASSIFICATION DEFINITIONS

The Revised Design Examination Guidelines regarding graphic image on a screen designs entered into force on April 1, , in Japan

Resource Description and Access Setting a new standard. Deirdre Kiorgaard

Government of Ontario IT Standard (GO ITS) GO-ITS Number 56.3 Information Modeling Standard

WORLD AIRLINE ENTERTAINMENT ASSOCIATION TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE WAEA SPECIFICATION

29--Proxies: When Are They Valid?

WM2015 Conference, March 15 19, 2015, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Agilent ICP-MS ChemStation Complying with 21 CFR Part 11. Application Note. Overview

Background. 6JSC/ALA/22 June 17, 2013 page 1 of 11. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA John Attig, ALA Representative

Large-Scale Digitization Project Checklist. About you. Please tell us a bit about your organization and your project.

Apple Inc. November 2007

Nature of Constituency Comments and their Review

Open Compute Project SM TRADEMARK USAGE GUIDELINES Ver. 1.2 August 1, 2016

Information and documentation International Standard Text Code (ISTC)

UC Bibliographic Standards for Cooperative, Vendor, and Campus Backlog Cataloging rev. 07/24/2012

Summary and Recommendations

SolarWinds Trademark and Copyright Guidelines

DCMI Abstract Model - DRAFT Update

Administrative Guideline. SMPTE Metadata Registers Maintenance and Publication SMPTE AG 18:2017. Table of Contents

3 Rs of RDA. A review and refresher on RDA for audiovisual materials. Scott M. Dutkiewicz, author. CSLA Conference 2015.

Are You GHS Compliant or at RISK for FINES?

Appendix B SUBSCRIPTION TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Addendum to British Columbia Electronic Library Network Electronic Products License Agreement

irnational Standard 5963

Lecture 19 Media Formats

Draft SDMX Technical Standards (Version 2.0) - Disposition Log Project Team

Editors. Getting Started

Website Planning Worksheets

Introduction. Topic 1. FRBR Terminology

Cataloging Videorecordings in RDA An Update

Sustainable File Formats for Electronic Records A Guide for Government Agencies

I.t Assignment by: Adnan pervez. 28 th of july Registration number: Submitted to: sir abrahim

Integration of Agilent OpenLAB CDS EZChrom Edition with OpenLAB ECM Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11

CC:DA/OLAC/2015/1 June 9, 2015 page 1 of 14

TECH 3381 CARRIAGE OF EBU-TT-D IN ISOBMFF VERSION: 1.0 SOURCE: SP/MIM XML SUBTITLES

PROCEDURE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EURACHEM GUIDANCE. Contents

105 Customer Service Guide

Thesis and Dissertation Digital Handbook

Oracle Binary Code License Agreement for the Java SE Platform Products and JavaFX

Voluntary Product Accessibility Template

[Draft] RDA Resource Description and Access

PRESCRIBED FORM TO BE COMPLETED BY A REQUESTER FORM B

Digitization of Magnetic Audio Tape. Matthew Wilcox, Audiovisual Archivist Michigan State University Archives & Historical Collections

Standards Designation and Organization Manual

Questionnaire on Correction Procedures in Patent Offices

POSSIBLE DATA OBJECTS FOR A LIBRARY RFID SYSTEM

QUESTIONNAIRE ON GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUI), ICON AND TYPEFACE/TYPE FONT DESIGNS. considered by the SCT at its fortieth session

2007 Japanese Design Law Amendment

Transcription:

page 1 of 9 TO: FROM: Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA John Attig, ALA Representative SUBJECT: Proposed Revisions of RDA instructions on Sources of Information (RDA 2.2.2.1 2.2.2.4) Among the Issues deferred until after the first release of RDA [6JSC/Sec/1], one of ALA s high priorities was Preferred Source of Information and Collective Titles in Chapter 2. ALA formed a Task Force to look into this and other issues relating to the RDA guidelines and instructions for the Basis for Identification of the Resource (RDA 2.1) and for Sources of Information (RDA 2.2). The Task Force has confirmed a perception that these guidelines are confusing and difficult to apply. The Task Force continues to work on a more comprehensive revision of these instructions, but has recommended that some specific changes should be proposed as soon as possible so that the revisions are available when RDA is implemented in 2013. ALA agrees with these recommendations. The following revision proposals are presented together because they all deal with RDA 2.2, although they deal with different issues. Each revision proposal is presented separately, along with background and rationale; a single clean copy of RDA 2.2, incorporating all of the proposed changes, is given at the end of the document. Recommendations A. Containers in RDA 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.4 This proposal was originally developed by the Music Library Association, which considered clarification of the status of containers in RDA 2.2.2 (Preferred Source of Information) to be a high priority. Based on a recommendation from the Task Force on Sources of Information, ALA has endorsed this revision proposal. This proposal is to revise the language of RDA 2.2.2.1 to make more explicit the role of a publisher-issued container as being part of a resource. The fourth paragraph of RDA 2.2.2.1 currently reads: Treat a container such as a box in which a game or kit is issued as part of the resource itself. Treat a container that is not issued as part of the resource (e.g., a box or case made by the owner) as a source outside the resource itself. We presume the instruction s intent is to make the provenance of the container (i.e. from the entity issuing the resource vs. from another source) the determinant for considering it part of a resource. The distinction is made in the negative, however ( a container that is not issued as part of the resource and the examples of containers issued as part of the resource itself are relatively esoteric and suggest a narrow application of the principle.

page 2 of 9 The instruction for accompanying material in 2.2.2.1, third paragraph, posits the material s status vis-à-vis the resource as a function of the level of description being prepared (comprehensive vs. analytical), where in the former level of description, the accompanying material is considered to be part of the resource. ALA believes that it would be helpful to make this distinction more explicit in 2.2.4, a). The corresponding distinction for containers is made in point b); ALA proposes a slight change in wording to make it parallel with 2.2.2.1. For the proposed language ( issued with the resource ), see section B below. RDA 2.2.2.1, fourth paragraph: proposed revisions: Treat a container issued with the resource (such as a box in which a game or kit is issued or a clamshell box containing compact discs in individual jewel cases or cardboard sleeves) as part of the resource itself. Treat a container that is was not issued as part of with the resource (e.g., a box or case made by the owner) as a source outside the resource itself. RDA 2.2.4: proposed revisions: 2.2.4 Other Sources of Information If information required to identify the resource does not appear on a source forming part of the resource itself (see 2.2.2.1), take it from one of the following sources (in order of preference): a) accompanying material (e.g., a leaflet, an "about" file) when preparing an analytical description b) a container that is was not issued as part of with the resource itself (e.g., a box, or case made by the owner) c) other published descriptions of the resource d) any other available source (e.g., a reference source). [remainder of instruction omitted; no change] B. Covers as sources of information The guidelines for containers make a distinction between those in which the resource is issued and those made by an owner after the resource is issued. The same distinction needs to be made regarding the use of a cover as a source of information in RDA 2.2.2.2. A cover should be used as a source of information only when it is issued by the publisher, distributor, or manufacturer of the resource. This is particularly important for early printed resources, which were commonly issued unbound and were bound to order by the purchaser. Even for modern resources, a distinction should be made between a cover issued by the publisher and one provided by a binder after publication.

page 3 of 9 The phrase issued by the publisher is not adequate when referring to early printed resources, as the functions of publisher, distributor ( bookseller ), and manufacturer ( printer ) were not always distinct. Rather than the cumbersome phrase issued by the publisher, distributor, or manufacturer, we recommend using the phrase issued with the resource. We also recommend that this phrase be used generally throughout RDA 2.2 (see the proposed revision of 2.2.2.1 above). RDA 2.2.2.2: proposed revisions: 2.2.2.2 Resources Consisting of One or More Pages, Leaves, Sheets, or Cards (or Images of One or More Pages, Leaves, Sheets, or Cards) [first paragraph and alternative omitted; no change] If the resource lacks a title page, title sheet, or title card (or image thereof), use as the preferred source of information the first of the following sources that bears a title: a) a cover issued with the resource (or an image of a that cover) b) a caption (or an image of a caption) c) a masthead (or an image of a masthead) d) a colophon (or an image of a colophon). Exception Early printed resources. If an early printed resource (or a reproduction thereof) lacks a title page, title sheet, or title card (or image thereof), use as the preferred source of information the first of the following sources that bears a title: a) a colophon (or an image of a colophon) b) a cover issued with the resource (or an image of a that cover) c) a caption (or an image of a caption) [remaining paragraphs omitted; no change] C. Priority of sources for moving-image resources (RDA 2.2.2.3) and other resources (RDA 2.2.2.4) At the November 2011 JSC meeting, representatives from the ISSN Network noted that RDA 2.2.2.4, which applies to electronic resources, does not allow the textual content of an online resources to be used as the preferred source. As such resources do not have labels, the next available choice is embedded metadata, which often yields an inadequate title. In looking at the provisions for using embedded metadata in RDA 2.2.2.3 and 2.2.2.4, it became clear that the priorities need to be re-examined. ALA is still working on this issue, and believes that ultimately there should be additional categories within 2.2.2, based on

page 4 of 9 categories of resources with their own conventions for presenting identifying information. While we are not ready to offer such a proposal at this time, we do offer revisions based on the following priorities for choosing the preferred source of information: Labels should be preferred over containers and accompanying material (unless the label does not include a collective title, and the container or accompanying material does). Containers and accompanying material should be preferred over embedded metadata. For tangible electronic resources, either a label or an internal source may be used. For online resources, either the textual content or embedded metadata may be used. We believe that these changes would be immediately beneficial to catalogers attempting to apply these instructions, and are likely to be generally compatible with any further proposals that we might make. We recommend that these revisions be approved, so that they can be available early in the RDA implementation next year. RDA 2.2.2.3: proposed revisions: 2.2.2.3 Resources Consisting of Moving Images If the resource consists of moving images (e.g., a film reel, a videodisc, a video game, an MPEG video file), use the title frame or frames, or title screen or screens, as the preferred source of information. If the title frames or title screens only list the titles of the individual contents and another source forming part of the resource bears a formally-presented collective title, choose the first applicable source bearing a formallypresented collective title. Alternative Use an eye-readable a label bearing a title that is permanently printed on or affixed to the resource (excluding accompanying textual material or a container) in preference to the title frame or frames, or title screen or screens. If the resource does not contain a title frame or title screen, use as the preferred source of information, as applicable the first of the following that bears a title: either a) a label bearing a title that is permanently printed on or affixed to the resource, excluding accompanying textual material or a container (e.g., a label on a videodisc) or b) embedded metadata in textual form that contains a title (e.g., metadata embedded in an MPG video file). b) for a comprehensive description, a container or accompanying material issued with the resource

page 5 of 9 c) one of the following: 1) textual content of an online resource 2) embedded metadata in textual form that contains a title (e.g., metadata embedded in an MPEG video file) [formerly b)] 3) an internal source forming part of a tangible digital resource (e.g., a disc menu). If the resource contains neither a title frame or title screen nor a source of information falling into category a), or b), or c) above, use as the preferred source of information another source forming part of the resource itself, giving preference to sources in which the information is formally presented. RDA 2.2.2.4: proposed revisions: 2.2.2.4 Other Resources For a resource other than one covered under 2.2.2.2 2.2.2.3, use as the preferred source of information, as applicable the first of the following sources that bears a title. If the first source of information that bears a title only lists the titles of the individual contents and another source forming part of the resource bears a formally-presented collective title, choose the first applicable source bearing a formally-presented collective title. either a) for tangible resources, one of the following: or 1) a textual source on the resource itself (e.g., a slide) or a label bearing a title that is permanently printed on or affixed to the resource, excluding accompanying textual material or a container (e.g., a label on an audio CD, or a model) 2) an internal source, such as a title screen, whose textual content formally presents the title b) embedded metadata in textual form that contains a title (e.g., metadata embedded in an MP3 audio file). b) for a comprehensive description of a tangible resource, a container or accompanying material issued with the resource c) one of the following: 1) textual content of an online resource 2) embedded metadata in textual form that contains a title (e.g., metadata embedded in an MP3 audio file) [formerly b)]

page 6 of 9 If the resource does not contain a source of information falling into category a), or b), or c) above, use as the preferred source of information another source forming part of the resource itself, giving preference to sources in which the information is formally presented. Clean copy 2.2 Sources of Information 2.2.1 Application Apply the instructions given under 2.2.2 2.2.4 when choosing a source of information for all elements covered in this chapter unless the instructions on sources of information for the element specify otherwise. 2.2.2.1 General Guidelines Use as the preferred source of information a source forming part of the resource itself that is appropriate to: a) the type of description (see 2.1) and b) the presentation format of the resource (see 2.2.2.2 2.2.2.4). When choosing a preferred source of information, treat both the storage medium (e.g., paper, tape, film) and any housing (e.g., a cassette, a cartridge) that is an integral part of the resource as part of the resource itself. Treat accompanying material as part of the resource itself when describing the resource as a whole using a comprehensive description. When preparing an analytical description of one or more components of a resource, treat accompanying material as a source outside the resource itself (i.e., as a related resource). Treat a container issued with the resource (such as a box in which a game or kit is issued or a clamshell box containing compact discs in individual jewel cases or cardboard sleeves) as part of the resource itself. Treat a container that was not issued with the resource (e.g., a box or case made by the owner) as a source outside the resource itself. If there is more than one source of information that qualifies as the preferred source of information for the resource as specified under 2.2.2.2 2.2.2.4, apply the additional instructions given under 2.2.3. If information required for the identification of the resource is not available from a source forming part of the resource itself, take it from another source as instructed under 2.2.4.

page 7 of 9 2.2.2.2 Resources Consisting of One or More Pages, Leaves, Sheets, or Cards (or Images of One or More Pages, Leaves, Sheets, or Cards) If the resource consists of: a) one or more pages, leaves, sheets, or cards (e.g., a book, an issue of a periodical, a poster, a series of sheet maps, a set of flashcards) or b) images of one or more pages, leaves, sheets, or cards (e.g., a microform reproduction of a musical score, a PDF file of a text, microform reproductions of a set of sheet maps, a JPEG image of a photograph) use the title page, title sheet, or title card (or image thereof) as the preferred source of information. Alternative If the resource consists of microform or computer images of one or more pages, leaves, sheets, or cards, use an eye-readable label bearing a title that is permanently printed on or affixed to the resource in preference to the image of the title page, title sheet, or title card. If the resource lacks a title page, title sheet, or title card (or image thereof), use as the preferred source of information the first of the following sources that bears a title: e) a cover issued with the resource (or an image of that cover) f) a caption (or an image of a caption) g) a masthead (or an image of a masthead) h) a colophon (or an image of a colophon). Exception Early printed resources. If an early printed resource (or a reproduction thereof) lacks a title page, title sheet, or title card (or image thereof), use as the preferred source of information the first of the following sources that bears a title: d) a colophon (or an image of a colophon) e) a cover issued with the resource (or an image of that cover) f) a caption (or an image of a caption) If none of the sources listed above bears a title, use as the preferred source of information another source within the resource that bears a title, giving preference to a source in which the information is formally presented.

page 8 of 9 If the resource does not contain any of the sources specified above, use as the preferred source of information another source forming part of the resource itself, giving preference to sources in which the information is formally presented. 2.2.2.3 Resources Consisting of Moving Images If the resource consists of moving images (e.g., a film reel, a videodisc, a video game, an MPEG video file), use the title frame or frames, or title screen or screens, as the preferred source of information. If the title frames or title screens only list the titles of the individual contents and another source forming part of the resource bears a formally-presented collective title, choose the first applicable source bearing a formallypresented collective title. Alternative Use a label bearing a title that is permanently printed on or affixed to the resource (excluding accompanying textual material or a container) in preference to the title frame or frames, or title screen or screens. If the resource does not contain a title frame or title screen, use as the preferred source of information the first of the following that bears a title: a) a label that is permanently printed on or affixed to the resource, excluding accompanying textual material or a container (e.g., a label on a videodisc) b) for a comprehensive description, a container or accompanying material issued with the resource c) one of the following: 1) textual content of an online resource 2) embedded metadata in textual form that contains a title (e.g., metadata embedded in an MPEG video file) 3) an internal source forming part of a tangible digital resource (e.g., a disc menu). If the resource contains neither a title frame or title screen nor a source of information falling into category a) b), or c) above, use as the preferred source of information another source forming part of the resource itself, giving preference to sources in which the information is formally presented. 2.2.2.4 Other Resources For a resource other than one covered under 2.2.2.2 2.2.2.3, use as the preferred source of information the first of the following sources that bears a title. If the first source of information that bears a title only lists the titles of the individual contents and another source forming part of the

page 9 of 9 resource bears a formally-presented collective title, choose the first applicable source bearing a formally-presented collective title. a) for tangible resources, one of the following: 1) a textual source on the resource itself (e.g., a slide) or a label that is permanently printed on or affixed to the resource, excluding accompanying textual material or a container (e.g., a label on an audio CD or a model) 2) an internal source, such as a title screen, whose textual content formally presents the title b) for a comprehensive description of a tangible resource, a container or accompanying material issued with the resource c) one of the following: 1) textual content of an online resource 2) embedded metadata in textual form that contains a title (e.g., metadata embedded in an MP3 audio file) If the resource does not contain a source of information falling into category a) b), or c) above, use as the preferred source of information another source forming part of the resource itself, giving preference to sources in which the information is formally presented. 2.2.3 More Than One Preferred Source of Information [instructions omitted; no change] 2.2.4 Other Sources of Information If information required to identify the resource does not appear on a source forming part of the resource itself (see 2.2.2.1), take it from one of the following sources (in order of preference): a) accompanying material (e.g., a leaflet, an "about" file) when preparing an analytical description b) a container that was not issued with the resource itself (e.g., a box or case made by the owner) c) other published descriptions of the resource d) any other available source (e.g., a reference source). [remainder of instruction omitted; no change]