Comment form for FRCC Standard for Regional Generator Performance During Frequency and Voltage Excursions (FRCC-S-PRC-024) version 3

Similar documents
Comment Form Revised FRCC Regional Reliability Standard Development Process Document (FRCC-RE-STD-001)

Consideration of Comments on FRCC Standard for Regional Generator Performance During Frequency and Voltage Excursions (FRCC-S-PRC-024) Version 2

Comment Form for Compliance Elements

Official Comment Form Reliability Guideline: Generating Unit Operations During Complete Loss of Communications

Standards Authorization Request Form

ALL DATA ON THIS FORM WILL BE TRANSFERRED AUTOMATICALLY TO A DATABASE AND IT IS THEREFORE IMPORTANT TO ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:

Creating an Account and Filing in the Data Collection and Analysis Modules (DCAM) System for Electronic Filing of Rescinded Policies:

Standard Development Timeline

Standards Authorization Request Form

Unofficial Comment Form 1st Draft of PRC-005-3: Protection System and Automatic Reclosing Maintenance (Project )

Standard COM-002-2a Communications and Coordination

FRCC Disturbance Monitoring Equipment Outage Reporting

NERC Overview and Compliance Update

Standard CIP 007 3a Cyber Security Systems Security Management

NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY CORPORATION

<PROJECT> WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

Project Retirement of Reliability Standard Requirements

Standard EOP Disturbance Reporting

BSCP128 Production, Submission, Audit and Approval of Line Loss Factors Version 3.0. Balancing and Settlement Code. BSC Procedure DRAFT

Project Posting 8 Frequently Asked Questions Guide

BSCP128 Production, Submission, Audit and Approval of Line Loss Factors Version 3.0. Balancing and Settlement Code. BSC Procedure DRAFT

Unofficial Comment Form Project Operating Personnel Communications Protocols COM Operating Personnel Communications Protocols

Standard CIP 007 4a Cyber Security Systems Security Management

Consideration of Issues and Directives Project Modeling Data (MOD B) October 7, 2013

Cyber Security Standards Drafting Team Update

Unofficial Comment Form for Interpretation of CIP-007-3, Requirement R5, for ITC (Project 2012-INT-04)

Standard Development Timeline

Background Information TPL Transmission System Planning Performance Requirements

Table of Contents. PCI Information Security Policy

Unofficial Comment Form Project Protection System Maintenance and Testing Phase 3 (Sudden Pressure Relays)

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Management and Vulnerability Assessments

Standard Authorization Request Form

Standard Development Timeline

Standard CIP 005 4a Cyber Security Electronic Security Perimeter(s)

Standard CIP 004 3a Cyber Security Personnel and Training

Standard CIP Cyber Security Physical Security

Cyber Security Incident Report

Module 3: Changes and Correspondence

Project Protection System Misoperations

Responding to REB Feedback

Video Services Forum Rules of Procedure

NERC Request for Data or Information: Protection System Misoperation Data Collection August 14, 2014

Click IACUC Researcher s Quick Reference

Certified Government Finance Officer (CGFO) Exam and Review Request for Qualifications

Unofficial Comment Form Project Operating Personnel Communications Protocols COM-002-4

2 Requests for Changes. About Requests for Changes

Standard CIP 005 2a Cyber Security Electronic Security Perimeter(s)

Internal Controls Procedure

National communication reporting guidelines for Annex I Parties. 4 th BRs and NCs lead reviewers meeting

This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective.

Step for Step Directions for Completing the Online Registration Process For Returning Students

Working with Track Changes: A Guide

SOUTHWEST DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING PROCEEDINGS

Alberta Reliability Standards Compliance Monitoring Program. Version 1.1

NYEIS IFSP and Service Authorization (SA) Workflow and Review Process Targeted Resource

Florida Blue and Florida Blue Foundation. Online Grant Application Information Guide

FRCC Disturbance Reporting Processes and Procedures

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber As s et Identification

Standard Development Timeline

Standard CIP Cyber Security Incident Reporting and Response Planning

Requesting Testing Accommodations for the SSAT

Communications Management Plan Template

NERC Relay Loadability Standard Reliability Standards Webinar November 23, 2010

TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION

Standards Authorization Request Justification

WECC Internal Controls Evaluation Process WECC Compliance Oversight Effective date: October 15, 2017

Appendix D The Need for a Systems Engineering Process Federal Rule 940

Project , COM Operating Personnel Communications Protocols Rationale and Technical Justification

Core Staff Review Approve with Contingencies

Committee on WIPO Standards (CWS)

Update: October 21, 2013

TxDOT Survey Manual. Manual Notice Archive. by Texas Department of Transportation (512) - all rights reserved

Southwest Power Pool AQ IMPROVEMENT TASK FORCE MEETING June 5, 2013, 9-11am Net Conference MINUTES

P802.3cf YANG Style improvements

Standard CIP-006-4c Cyber Security Physical Security

Unofficial Comment Form Project Real-time Monitoring and Analysis Capabilities IRO and TOP-010-1

Doctoral Dissertation Template

Physical Security Reliability Standard Implementation

Standard CIP-006-3c Cyber Security Physical Security

Comment Form for 1 st Draft of Standard for Backup Facilities (Project )

Send initial disclosures and get e-signatures via NPRESS

IACUC Researcher s Quick Reference

All IMO Members Intergovernmental Organizations Non-Governmental Organizations in Consultative Status

NENA Procedures for Notification of ERDB and VPC Operators of ESN Changes by Administrator Operations Information Document

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber As s et Identification

Missouri Housing Development Commission Certified Property Management Agent Program

NAPM RAIL INDUSTRY FORUM Application Advice IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINE FOR EDI

Internal Controls Evaluation (ICE) Processing

USER GUIDANCE ON THE SHIP FUEL OIL CONSUMPTION GISIS MODULE (IMO SHIP FUEL OIL CONSUMPTION DATABASE) CONTENTS

Communication Skills Center

Proposed Code Modifications This document created by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation

St. Kitts and Nevis Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) Competent Authority. FATCA Portal Demonstration to Financial Institutions

Proposed Clean and Redline for Version 2 Implementation Plan

Consultation questions

Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) User Guide

RFQ OIT-1 Q&A. Questions and Answers, in the order received.

Progress Report Negotiations on the Registrar Accreditation Agreement Status as of 1 March 2012

<PROJECT NAME> IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Appendix 2B. Supply Chain Risk Management Plan

Issue for Consideration: Appropriateness of the Drafting of Paragraph A17

Transcription:

Please use this form to submit comments on version 3 of an FRCC Standard on Regional Generator Performance During Frequency and Voltage Excursions. Comments must be submitted by April 18, 2007 (this standard has also been referred to as the Generator Coordination standard). You must submit the completed form by emailing it to the FRCC Standards Process Manager at FRCCStandard@frcc.com, with the words FRCC Generator Coordination Standard in the subject line. If you have any questions, please contact Anne Brown at abrown@frcc.com, or 813-289-5644. ALL COMMENTS ON THIS FORM WILL BE POSTED ON THE FRCC WEBSITE. DO: Do enter text only, with no formatting or styles added Do use punctuation and capitalization as needed (except quotations) Do use more than one form if responses do not fit in the spaces provided Do submit any formatted text or markups in a separate WORD file. DO NOT: Do not insert tabs or paragraph returns in any data field. Do not use numbering or bullets in any data field. Do not use quotation marks in any data field. Do not submit a response in an unprotected copy of this form Individual Commenter Information (Complete this page for comments from one organization or an individual) Name: Robert C. Williams Organization: Florida Municipal Power Agency Telephone: 407-355-7767 Email: bob.williams@fmpa.com

Please Enter All Comments in Simple Text Format. Insert a check mark in the appropriate boxes by clicking in the gray areas. 1. In response to comments received, the Drafting Team (DT) has modified the data retention period of the Compliance section to three (3) years. Do you agree with this change? 2. In response to comments received, appendix A has been modified to include islanding in order to match Requirement R1. Appendix A has also been modified to clarify the generator protection coordination technical requirements. Do you agree with these clarifications? 3. Do you agree that the DT has fairly and appropriately addressed all comments received on the posted versions of this standard?

4. The DT feels that version 3 is ready to be presented to the FRCC Operating Committee and Planning Committee with a recommendation for adoption as a Regional Reliability standard. Do you agree? 5. Please provide any other comments that the DT should consider.

Please use this form to submit comments on version 3 of an FRCC Standard on Regional Generator Performance During Frequency and Voltage Excursions. Comments must be submitted by April 18, 2007 (this standard has also been referred to as the Generator Coordination standard). You must submit the completed form by emailing it to the FRCC Standards Process Manager at FRCCStandard@frcc.com, with the words FRCC Generator Coordination Standard in the subject line. If you have any questions, please contact Anne Brown at abrown@frcc.com, or 813-289-5644. ALL COMMENTS ON THIS FORM WILL BE POSTED ON THE FRCC WEBSITE. DO: Do enter text only, with no formatting or styles added Do use punctuation and capitalization as needed (except quotations) Do use more than one form if responses do not fit in the spaces provided Do submit any formatted text or markups in a separate WORD file. DO NOT: Do not insert tabs or paragraph returns in any data field. Do not use numbering or bullets in any data field. Do not use quotation marks in any data field. Do not submit a response in an unprotected copy of this form Individual Commenter Information (Complete this page for comments from one organization or an individual) Name: Bernie Budnik Organization: Reedy Creek Improvement District Telephone: 407-824-6441 Email: Bernie.budnik@disney.com

Please Enter All Comments in Simple Text Format. Insert a check mark in the appropriate boxes by clicking in the gray areas. 1. In response to comments received, the Drafting Team (DT) has modified the data retention period of the Compliance section to three (3) years. Do you agree with this change? 2. In response to comments received, appendix A has been modified to include islanding in order to match Requirement R1. Appendix A has also been modified to clarify the generator protection coordination technical requirements. Do you agree with these clarifications? Requirements to the standard should not be contained in an Appendix, all requirements should be listed in the Requirements Section. 3. Do you agree that the DT has fairly and appropriately addressed all comments received on the posted versions of this standard?

4. The DT feels that version 3 is ready to be presented to the FRCC Operating Committee and Planning Committee with a recommendation for adoption as a Regional Reliability standard. Do you agree? See previous and following comments. 5. Please provide any other comments that the DT should consider. The Applicability section should only contain the entity that the standard is applicable to (Example: Generator Owner). Currently, requirements are contained in this section as drafted. Requirements for the size units within the Generator Owners fleet that the standard is applicable to are/should be contained within the requirements section. Additionally, requirements should not be embedded in the Appendix. All requirements should be numbered and assigned a Risk Factor within the requirements section. Requirement R2 as written is unnecessary, the M2 measure addresses this. Levels of n-compliance 2.1 and 2.2 should both be Level 1 noncompliance violations. From a compliance point of view they both require the submission of documentation (which is late/not provided). Why is documentation of requirement R3 a more severe violation than R1?