Usability test report: Digital Collections 1

Similar documents
Usability Test Report: Link 2.0 1

Usability Test Report: Requesting Library Material 1

Usability Test Report: Bento results interface 1

Usability Test Report: get Interface 1

Usability Test: 1 News, Events, and Exhibits

Usability Test Report: Homepage / Search Interface 1

Usability Test Report: Tool for Books & More Bento Box 1

Usability Testing Report: Lilly Library s Homepage 1

Usability Report Cover Sheet

Library Outages - Guerilla Test Round 2

Survey: 1 Bento Satisfaction

Eyetracking Study: Kent State University Library. Janie Ralston

OAC FIRST RO U N D USABIL IT Y TES T FIND I N GS. OAC Redesign Project

GRADY NEWSOURCE KATE DEVLIN, LEAH MOSS, ANDREA SKELLIE & ASHLEY PANTER

National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Norman, OK Website Redesign Proposal Report 12/14/2015

Memorandum Participants Method

USMA Library Tutorial: How to search the USMA Digital Collections Created July 5, 2017

Fall 2013 Harvard Library User Survey Summary December 18, 2013

Electronic Gateway Functional Team Website Usability Working Group Usability Test September 2005

Library Website Migration and Chat Functionality/Aesthetics Study February 2013

Julie Rand LIS Fall Usability Study

Art, Architecture & Engineering Library (AAEL) Website Redesign & Usability 2006

Your message in Outlook will look something like the illustration below. Begin by right-clicking on the name of the attachment.

Instructional Design: ADDIE Model

SFX Label & Options Menu Guerilla Test of SFX Label (round 1) Project Cover Sheet. SFX Label & Options Menu

Usability Report Cover Sheet

Dataverse Usability Evaluation: Findings & Recommendations. Presented by Eric Gibbs Lin Lin Elizabeth Quigley

K-State Libraries Usability Team Report Summer 2013

Testers: Heather Blunt, Patricia Fisken, Donald Fitzpatrick, Janifer Holt, & Jeremy Seidling

Calisphere UI Testing Findings and Recommendations

Buddhist Symbols Style Guide


Group #5. Checkpoint #4. Page Grids:

Usability Testing Review

Search Box Usability Testing Report November 5, 2007

DSSLearnCenter User s Guide for DSS Employees

This report will document the key themes arising from the testing, and make recommendations for the development of the site.

Problem and Solution Overview: An elegant task management solution, that saves busy people time.

Web Evaluation Report Guidelines

DESIGN MEDIA ARTS UCLA Department of Deisgn Media Arts UCLA UCLArts Art Sci EDA DMA Labs Support Website Credits

COGNITIVE WALKTHROUGH. Andrew Ward Pratt Institute School of Library and Information Science

The Redesign of LAPACK Final Project Report User Interface Design CSCI 6838, Spring 2000 Sponsored by Liz Jessup

The Researcher Development Online Tool User Guide for AUT Postgraduate Research Students

5 R1 The one green in the same place so either of these could be green.

APPENDIX. Using Google Sites. After you read this appendix, you will be able to:

A Heuristic Evaluation of Ohiosci.org

SWAT Folder Usability Test Student Website Advancement Team Usability Test 2014

Detailed instructions for adding (or changing) your Avatar (profile picture next to your

Objectives. Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with the Unified Process 2

Degree Works redesign Research Report

ArticlesPlus Launch Survey

Magnetize Your. Website. A step-by-step action guide to attracting your perfect clients. Crystal Pina. StreamlineYourMarketing.com

CS Human 2.0 Studio Lo-fi Prototyping & Pilot Usability Test

Primo New UI - Not Just for Undergrads: A usability study

CHAPTER 5 TESTING AND IMPLEMENTATION

Cindy Fan, Rick Huang, Maggie Liu, Ethan Zhang November 6, c: Usability Testing Check-In

USABILITY TEST REPORT

3d: Usability Testing Review

Usability Testing and Design of a Library Website: An Iterative Approach

Report on the Focus Group held at UCB

Hershey Park. By: Alicia Danenhower. English 3880 Section 10. Deborah Welsh.

COGNITIVE WALKTHROUGH REPORT. The International Children s Digital Library

Usability Report. Author: Stephen Varnado Version: 1.0 Date: November 24, 2014

Axis labels for graphs could be improved (heuristic violated-visibility of system status):

Drupal Cloud Getting Started Guide Creating a Lab site with the MIT DLC Theme

TALENT Part 1 page 1 of 1

Usability Testing Report of College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (CLAS) Website

CHAPTER 18: CLIENT COMMUNICATION

Amazon Webstore Usability Test

Team : Let s Do This CS147 Assignment 7 (Low-fi Prototype) Report

Classroom Website Basics

New Website User Manual

Delivery guide: SAGE Video

Web Systems Staff Intranet Card Sorting. Project Cover Sheet. Library Staff Intranet. UM Library Web Systems

Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio

One a Time: Pop Up Usability Testing

Reviewing and Evaluating your Website

Raritan Valley Community College: Evelyn S. Field Library Homepage Usability Study. Alyssa M. Valenti, MS, MLIS

Rachel Merriman Anna Whitney

Krab Shack App. Usability Test Report. Steven Landry 4/23/16 CS5760

Getting Started With Blackfish Tools

Connect Support Request Guide

Consumers Energy Usability Testing Report

Core Collection Search Portal Usability Report

Usability Testing An Analysis of the YouTube Registration System

EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS): a Research Study for NYU Libraries!!!!!!

Issues identified from heuristic evaluations:

Department User Guide

205CDE: Developing the Modern Web. Assignment 1: Designing a Website. Scenario: D Bookshop

Welcome to Moodle! How To Moodle

As a lab attendant, you will be using isupport to put in tickets for issues that you work on. Those are going to break down to a few general types.

Core Technology Development Team Meeting

USABILITY REPORT A REPORT OF USABILITY FINDINGS FOR OFF THE BEATEN PATH WEBSITE

Stream Features Application Usability Test Report

Getting Started with Moodle

Hi Bob, I got this from my colleagues near the end of last week and unfortunately lost track of it in my inbox to send you.

Skype for Business Features Overview

MiPhone Phone Usage Tracking

2013 EDITION. V-Camp Student. Guide. INTERACTIVE GUIDE Use the buttons shown below to navigate throughout this interactive PDF BACK

Introduction. Hi, I m Sarah. Let s follow along with Jane while she navigates the Internet to learn about the parts of a website.

Transcription:

Usability test report: Digital Collections 1 Recommendations to consider 1. Put button to request item for on-site use in the Item Info section or the right sidebar. 2. Reword Start Over to clarify that it takes the user back to the collection s main page. 3. Reword Back to Search to clarify that it takes the user back to the search results. 4. Make the Download button visible without the user having to scroll down to see it. 5. Allow users to navigate between different images using keyboard arrow keys. Background Emily Daly and Emma Boettcher conducted usability testing on the W. Duke & Sons Digital Collection in the Perkins lobby on October 7, 2015 from 1:00 pm to 2:30 pm. A pilot was conducted with a graduate student the previous day. The test consisted of a short set of background questions, five tasks, and two post-test questions. The test lasted approximately 5-7 minutes. See Appendix for usability test script. Questions we hoped to answer through the test included the following: How do users search or browse for items from the collection homepage? How do users employ facets while searching or browsing for items? How do users navigate within and zoom in on items? How do users get back to the homepage using links on the collection page? How do users download items from the collection? How do users try to request items for use in real life? What do users like most about the site? What do users dislike most about the site? Participants Eight individuals completed the test; the test was piloted by an additional graduate student in engineering management. Participants included one staff member (13%), four undergraduate students (50%) and three graduate students (37%). They represented the following departments: public policy, computer science, statistical science, economics, and biology. Two students (25%) were undeclared. For more information, please contact emily.daly@duke.edu 1 P a g e

Key findings How do users search or browse for items from the collection homepage? How do users employ facets while searching or browsing for items? Participants were asked to select an album of trading cards that used to be sold in packs of cigarettes. Four participants (50%) used search to find an album. o One participant (13%) only got one result and returned to the homepage to browse. o One participant (13%) used the facets on the results page to narrow his results to album. Three participants (37%) selected cigarette cards from the left sidebar on the homepage, then narrowed their results using albums. o One participant (13%) looked at the facets on the results page without using albums, but eventually used albums to narrow the results. Three participants (37%) selected an item that was highlighted on the homepage. o Two participants (13%) selected a card and tried to see if it was connected to a scrapbook. o One participant (13%) was able to use information about the materials on the homepage to decide if the item was an album before clicking through. How do users navigate within and zoom in on items? Participants were asked to navigate to a page with some text on it and zoom in on the page until they could read the text. Three participants (37%) used the top navigation to move through the album. Three participants (37%) used the sidebar to move through the album. One participant (13%) tried to use the keyboard arrow keys to navigate through the album. One participant (13%) tried to use the item information to tell if there was text in the album. Five participants (63%) used the + sign in the top navigation to zoom in on the text. Three participants (37%) used the trackpad to zoom in on the text. How do users get back to the homepage using links on the collection page? Participants were asked to return to the collection s homepage without using the browser s back button. Three participants (37%) used the link to the collection to the left of the album. Three participants (25%) used the Back to Search link. 2 P a g e

o o o One participant (13%) used the link to the collection on the search results page. One participant (13%) used the Start Over link on the search results page. One participant (13%) clicked on the Rubenstein link, then returned to the search results page, then selected Start Over. One participant (13%) selected the Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Collection, then, when back on the item page, clicked on the More Duke Digital Collections link, and was not able to get back to the W. Duke & Sons collection page. One participant (13%) selected the Digital Repository logo at the top of the page and after clicking on the various collections and was not able to get back to the W. Duke & Sons collection page. Two participants (25%) said they would use the back button if not instructed to find an alternative route. How do users download items from the collection? Four participants (50%) right-clicked an image and selected Save image as to download the item. o One participant (13%) discovered the Download button later in the tasks. Four participants (50%) used the download button to download the image. o Two participants (25%) stated that they were going to right-click and Save image as but discovered the Download button and used that option instead. How do users try to request items for use in real life? Five participants (63%) looked at Item Information for information on how to request the item. o One participant (13%) thought the Series information would help them physically locate the item. o One participant (13%) thought the Collection number would help them physically locate the item. Five participants (63%) would contact the library or a librarian for more information. o Two participants (25%) would use the links under Contact to talk to someone for more information. Five participants (63%) were able to determine that the item was part of the Rubenstein collection. Three participants (37%) clicked on the Guide to the Collection for information on how to request the item. o One participant (13%) would use the Request for on-site use button to request the item. o Two participants (25%) did not find the Request for on-site use button and either kept searching for more information or gave up. 3 P a g e

Two participants (25%) would search the library s main catalog to find the item. o One participant (13%) tried doing so but was unsuccessful. What do users like most about the site? In a post-test interview, users were asked what two things they liked most about the site. Most commented on visual aspects of the site. Six participants (75%) commented on the picture viewer and the ability to zoom and see the sidebar after hovering over it. Two participants (25%) commented on the thumbnails and being able to see what an image looked like on the search results page and homepage without clicking through. Two participants (25%) commented on the layout and interface generally, saying that they liked it or that it was good design. Two participants (25%) commented that they liked the homepage, particularly the fact that the images changed and that it presented an overview of the collection. What do users dislike most about the site? Three participants (37%) commented that they couldn t figure out how to find the physical item from Rubenstein Library. o One participant (13%) wanted information about finding the physical item, even if it was just contact information, on the Item Info section. Three participants (37%) commented that the layout and navigation were unclear or unnecessarily complicated. o One participant (13%) was used to seeing nested trees of menus and had a hard time figuring out where things were. o One participant (13%) commented that he thought library websites were pretty clunky because they had too many links, and noticed this especially on the Collection Guide. o One participant (13%) commented that the scale on the page was too high and he had to scroll down too much. Two participants (25%) made three comments about the wording of the site. o One participant (13%) thought Start Over on the search results page was vague. o One participant (13%) thought the wording for Source Collection was too similar to Collection. o The participant who found and would use the request button (13%) thought it was unclear, and thought Download would be clearer, so she may not have understood what on-site use meant at all. One participant (13%) wanted a faster way to get back to the original size of an image he had zoomed in or out on, but figured out that he could click on the thumbnail in the sidebar to restore it to the original size. 4 P a g e

One participant (13%) commented that he wasn t sure about how to search for a specific document or item in the collection, and thought it would be helpful to have a table of contents or some guidelines on searching. Appendix: Digital Collections usability test script Thank you for agreeing to take part in this study. We are trying to understand more fully how students, faculty and staff interact with a website for finding and using library materials that have been digitized. Keep in mind that there are no right or wrong answers and that we re testing a tool not you. Okay, first some general questions: Are you an undergrad, grad student, faculty member, staff member, or visitor to Duke? a. If you are an undergrad, what year are you? b. For undergrads: What is your major? For grads, faculty, staff: What department are you in? Now I d like for you to complete five short tasks using the W. Duke & Sons Digital Collection, which includes all kinds of advertising materials and collectibles from tobacco companies (point to https://repository-pre.lib.duke.edu/dc/wdukesons). It would be really helpful if you would share your thoughts and observations as you are completing the tasks, so try to think aloud as much as you can. Like I said, there are no right or wrong answers. TASK ONE This collection includes trading cards that used to be sold in packs of cigarettes. You re interested in viewing an album of these cards. From this page, https://repositorypre.lib.duke.edu/dc/wdukesons, find the albums of cards, and select one. TASK TWO Now, find a page in the album that has some text on it, and zoom in so you can read it easily. TASK THREE You would now like to go back to the homepage for the W. Duke & Sons collection. Show me how you would get to the homepage without using the back button. TASK FOUR 5 P a g e

Now, find an item on this page that looks interesting. You d like to save it to your computer to look at later. Show me how you would do that. TASK FIVE You d like to see the actual item you ve just saved. Where is it physically located? Show me how you would request this item so you can see it in real life. Okay, that concludes our tasks. I have a couple of questions I d like to ask you about your experience feel free to leave this page open if you like. POST-TEST INTERVIEW 1) What two things about this site did you like best? 2) What two things about this site did you like least? 6 P a g e