On-orbit Calibration of the Geostationary Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS)

Similar documents
Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer. Part II: Instrument Performance

CrIS Full Spectral Resolution SDR and S-NPP/JPSS-1 CrIS Performance Status

IASI spectral calibration monitoring on MetOp-A and MetOp-B

Lossy Data Compression for Imaging Interferometer Data using a Wavelet Transform- Based Image Compresion Algorithm

The IASI Instrument. on the assimilation of IASI in NWP Reading, May 6-8, ECMWF / NWP-SAF Workshop ! "# $ !" #$%& #$!$$

Polarization Ray Trace, Radiometric Analysis, and Calibration

Infrared Scene Simulation for Chemical Standoff Detection System Evaluation

Interactive comment on Quantification and mitigation of the impact of scene inhomogeneity on Sentinel-4 UVN UV-VIS retrievals by S. Noël et al.

Interactive comment on Quantification and mitigation of the impact of scene inhomogeneity on Sentinel-4 UVN UV-VIS retrievals by S. Noël et al.

TES Algorithm Status. Helen Worden

Evaluation of Different Calibration Approaches for JPSS CrIS

INVESTIGATION OF SCRAMJET FLOWFIELD TEMPERATURES AT THE BOUNDARY LAYER WITH HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING THESIS. Amy M. Kerst, Civilian AFIT-ENP-MS-18-J-011

CRISM (Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars) on MRO. Calibration Upgrade, version 2 to 3

Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Lightning Imager (LI) instrument performance and calibration from user perspective

GEOG 4110/5100 Advanced Remote Sensing Lecture 2

Reprocessing of Suomi NPP CrIS SDR and Impacts on Radiometric and Spectral Long-term Accuracy and Stability

Charles L. Bennett, USA. Livermore, CA 94550

Calibration algorithm for Fourier transform spectrometer with thermal instabilities

Hyperspectral Infrared Measurements Simulation and Collection for GOES-R Sounder Lossless and Lossy Data Compression Study and Beyond

Optics Vac Work MT 2008

ENHANCEMENT OF DIFFUSERS BRDF ACCURACY

GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER. Future of cal/val. K. Thome NASA/GSFC

Dr. Larry J. Paxton Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, MD (301) (301) fax

Comparison of Full-resolution S-NPP CrIS Radiance with Radiative Transfer Model

S-NPP CrIS Full Resolution Sensor Data Record Processing and Evaluations

How GOSAT has provided uniform-quality spectra and optimized global sampling patterns for seven years

Satellite Infrared Radiance Validation Studies using a Multi-Sensor/Model Data Fusion Approach

Document Number: SC2/FTS/SOF/020

Visualization and Tomographic Analysis of Chemical Vapor Plumes via LWIR Imaging Fabry-Perot Spectrometry

7.1 Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) Design and Operational Flexibility Dr. Paul C. Griffith

IMAGING AND FIELD SPECTROMETER DATA S ROLE IN CALIBRATING CLIMATE-QUALITE SENSORS Kurtis, J. Thome NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD

Component Level Prediction Versus System Level Measurement of SABER Relative Spectral Response

IASI on MetOp-B Radiometric Calibration

MRO CRISM TRR3 Hyperspectral Data Filtering

Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) Level 1B Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document

Visualization and tomographic analysis of chemical vapor plumes via LWIR imaging Fabry-Perot spectrometry

Appendix III: Ten (10) Specialty Areas - Remote Sensing/Imagry Science Curriculum Mapping to Knowledge Units-RS/Imagry Science Specialty Area

CrIS SDR Calibration and Cross-sensor Comparisons

S2 MPC Data Quality Report Ref. S2-PDGS-MPC-DQR

Menghua Wang NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Camp Springs, MD 20746, USA

Determining satellite rotation rates for unresolved targets using temporal variations in spectral signatures

Laser Beacon Tracking for High-Accuracy Attitude Determination

Evaluation of Satellite Ocean Color Data Using SIMBADA Radiometers

Analysis Ready Data For Land (CARD4L-ST)

Formulas of possible interest

11.2 ABI s Unique Calibration and Validation Capabilities

Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

High Spectral Resolution Infrared Radiance Modeling Using Optimal Spectral Sampling (OSS) Method

Working with M 3 Data. Jeff Nettles M 3 Data Tutorial at AGU December 13, 2010

Lecture 24. Lidar Simulation

Sentinel-2 Calibration and Validation : from the Instrument to Level 2 Products

Mu lt i s p e c t r a l

New capabilities of diffuser calibration lab at GSFC NASA to support remote sensing instrumentation

Appendix E. Development of methodologies for Brightness Temperature evaluation for the MetOp-SG MWI radiometer. Alberto Franzoso (CGS, Italy)

The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager

CAL/VAL JAXA Agency Report

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No

A Responsivity-based Criterion for Accurate Calibration of FTIR Emission Spectra: Identification of In-band Low-responsivity Wavenumbers

CARBON NANOTUBE FLAT PLATE BLACKBODY CALIBRATOR. John C. Fleming

On Differences in Effective and Spectral Radiance MSG Level 1.5 Image Products

MERIS Instrument Status

Calibration of a portable interferometer for fiber optic connector endface measurements

IMAGING SPECTROMETER DATA CORRECTION

Synthesis Imaging. Claire Chandler, Sanjay Bhatnagar NRAO/Socorro

4D Technology Corporation

LASER COMMUNICATION FOR EDRS LEO-GEO, LEO-GROUND, GEO-GROUND

Spatial heterodyne spectroscopy: Modeling and interferogram processing

TracePro Stray Light Simulation

The 4A/OP model: from NIR to TIR, new developments for time computing gain and validation results within the frame of international space missions

Suomi NPP CrIS Reprocessed SDR Long-term Accuracy and Stability

Lecture 13.1: Airborne Lidar Systems

Shallow-water Remote Sensing: Lecture 1: Overview

CWG Analysis: ABI Max/Min Radiance Characterization and Validation

Using Python with Smoke and JWST Mirrors. Warren Hack, Perry Greenfield, Babak Saif, Bente Eegholm Space Telescope Science Institute

PERFORMANCE REPORT ESTEC. The spectral calibration of JWST/NIRSpec: accuracy of the instrument model for the ISIM-CV3 test cycle

ARIES. ARIES C&DH Software Data Content & Format

Calibration Techniques for NASA s Remote Sensing Ocean Color Sensors

Appendix A Telescope Beam Profiles Calculation

PHYSICS 213 PRACTICE EXAM 3*

Uncertainties in the Products of Ocean-Colour Remote Sensing

MTG-FCI: ATBD for Outgoing Longwave Radiation Product

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Multispectral Analysis of MASTER HDF Data 2

The Council for Optical Radiation Measurements (CORM), NIST July 30 - Aug 1, 2018

SSA Modeling and Simulation with DIRSIG

GOCI Post-launch calibration and GOCI-II Pre-launch calibration plan

University of Technology Building & Construction Department / Remote Sensing & GIS lecture

Polarized Downwelling Radiance Distribution Camera System

MHS Instrument Pre-Launch Characteristics

MKV Carrier Vehicle Sensor Calibration

Spectral imagers for nanosatellites

Comparison of relative signal-to-noise ratios of different classes of imaging spectrometer

WAVELENGTH MANAGEMENT

GeoTASO Project Summary and Relevance. Jim Leitch Ball Aerospace

Modeling of the ageing effects on Meteosat First Generation Visible Band

Prototyping GOES-R Albedo Algorithm Based on MODIS Data Tao He a, Shunlin Liang a, Dongdong Wang a

Lecture 09. Lidar Simulation and Error Analysis Overview (1)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

UHD 185 FAQs. Optical System

Fourier Transform Imaging Spectrometer at Visible Wavelengths

Control of Light. Emmett Ientilucci Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science 8 May 2007

Transcription:

On-orbit Calibration of the Geostationary Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS) H. E. Revercomb a, F. A. Best a, D. C. Tobin a, R. O. Knuteson a, R. K. Garcia a, D. D. LaPorte a, G. E. Bingham b, and W. L Smith c a University of Wisconsin-Madison, Space Science and Engineering Center b Utah State University, Space Dynamics Laboratory c NASA Langley Research Center The Year 2002 Conference on Characterization and Radiometric Calibration for Remote Sensing April 29 - May 2, 2002 Space Dynamics Laboratory / Utah State University

Abstract The NASA New Millennium Program s Geostationary Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS) requires highly accurate radiometric and spectral calibration in order to carry out its mission to provide water vapor, wind, temperature, and trace gas profiling from geostationary orbit. A calibration approach has been developed for the formulation phase GIFTS instrument design. The in-flight calibration is performed using views of two on-board blackbody sources along with cold space. A radiometric calibration uncertainty analysis has been developed and used to show that the expected performance for GIFTS exceeds its top level requirement to measure brightness temperature to better than 1 K. The spectral calibration is established by the highly stable diode laser used as the reference for interferogram sampling, and verified with comparisons to atmospheric calculations. Algorithms that normalize spectral sampling have been developed to correct for off-axis effects. A baseline approach defining the role that ground measurements play in the on-orbit calibration has been established. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 2

GIFTS Measurement Concept Combine Advanced Measurement Technologies On a Geosynchronous Satellite to Obtain 4-D D Observations of the Atmosphere Horizontal: Large detector arrays give near instantaneous wide 2-D geographical coverage Vertical: Michelson interferometer (FTS) gives high spectral resolution that yields high vertical resolution Temporal: Geosynchronous orbit allows high time resolution (i.e., motion observations) May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 3

GIFTS Calibration Overview Overall Calibration Requirement Radiometric (test with blackbody) Spectral (test with gas cell / Earth) Spatial (test with variable scene) Laser Wavenumber Instrument Line Shape Uncertainty Geometric Stability ROIC Cross-talk Optical Cross-talk Blackbody Emissivity & Temperature Instrument Temperature Stability Linearity Uncalibrated Mirror Reflectance Pointing Mirror Polarization & Scattering Residual Radiance Noise Aliasing Items to be addressed quantitatively in this talk. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 4

Radiometric Calibration

Topics - On-orbit Radiometric Calibration Top level requirements In-flight Radiometric Calibration Concept for GIFTS Predicted Radiometric Performance In-flight Calibrator Baseline Design Heritage May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 6

GIFTS Blackbody Top Level Requirements Calibration Accuracy [From the GIRD 5.5.1 (GIR398)] The absolute calibration accuracy of the GIFTS Instrument shall be =1K brightness temperature for Earth scene brightness temperatures >240K (SW/MW channel) and >190K (LW channel) and shall be traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The reproducibility shall be =0.2K for the same conditions. On-Board Calibration [From the GIRD 5.5.3 (GIR400)] The GIFTS instrument shall provide three calibration reference sources that shall be viewable at regular, programmable intervals. Two of these sources shall be blackbodies at temperatures chosen to optimize calibration accuracy over the life of the mission. The instrument shall include the capability of viewing space as a third calibration source May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 7

GIFTS Radiometric Calibration Concept Two small reference Blackbodies located behind telescope, combined with Space View. Blackbody design is scaled from the UW groundbased AERI and NAST / S-HIS aircraft instruments. Constraints on original S/C prevented traditional external large aperture blackbody configuration. Advantages compared to large external blackbody: (1) higher emissivity is practical with small size (2) protection from solar forcing. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 8

Fore Optics (Afocal Telescope) Entrance Aperture M1 M2 M3 Location of Flip-in Mirror for Viewing Internal Blackbodies F1 Exit Pupil May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 9

Oblique View of Optical Subsystem Location of Flip-in Mirror for Viewing Internal Blackbodies (not shown) Internal Blackbodies May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 10

GIFTS Radiometric Calibration Concept τ C C N = m + C C τ t H C ( B B ) Re E S B H C S Radiance N derived from raw spectra of Earth (C E ), Space (C S ), and the internal Hot (C H ) and Cold (C C ) Blackbodies τ t is the signal transmission of the telescope mirrors & τ m is the transmission of the Blackbody pick-off mirror B is the Planck Radiance from the Hot, Cold, and Space References May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 11

GIFTS Radiometric Calibration Parameters Absolute Calibration Uncertainties Input Parameters Parameter Uncertainties wn 1000 Wavenumber, [cm-1] TauTel 0.913 Transmission of Telescope (2) plus front flat (1) ²TauRatio 0.0020 TauBBmirror 0.970 Transmission of BB mirror ²TauBBmirror 0.010 Thbb 300 Temp. of Hot Blackbody, [K] ²Thbb 0.1 Tcbb 265 Temp. of Cold Blackbody, [K] ²Tcbb 0.1 Tspace 4.0 Temp. of Space View, [K] ²Tspace 0.00 Ttel 265 Temp. of Front Telescope, [K] ²Ttel 2.00 Tbbmirror 220 Temp. of blackbody mirror, [K] ²Tbbmirror 2.00 Tstr 250 Temp. of Structure Reflecting into BB's, [K] ²Tstr 5.00 Ttail 4.0 Temp. of Struct. Reflecting into Space View, [K] ²Ttail 0.00 Ehbb 0.996 Emissivity of HBB, [-] ²Ehbb 0.002 Ecbb 0.996 Emissivity of CBB, [-] ²Ecbb 0.002 Espace 1.0 Effective Emissivity of Space View, [-] ²Espace 0.000 Parameters Used For Temperature Stability Affects TtelChange 0.4 Change in Telescope Temp Between Earth & Space Views TbbmirChange 2.0 Change in BB Mirror Temp Between Hot and Cold Views May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 12

GIFTS Calibration Accuracy-Longwave GIFTS Calibration Accuracy 1000 cm-1 Tau Unknown Tau Known End-to-end Cal 1.000 0.800 Requirement 0.600 0.400 0.200 GIFTS Baseline 0.000 190 210 230 250 270 290 310 330 Scene Temperature, K May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 13

GIFTS Calibration Accuracy-Shortwave GIFTS Calibration Accuracy 2000 cm-1 Tau Unknown Tau Known End-to-end Cal 1.000 0.800 Requirement 0.600 0.400 0.200 GIFTS Baseline 0.000 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 Scene Temperature, K May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 14

GIFTS Calibration Errors-Longwave GIFTS Radiometric Calibration: 1000 cm -1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 dthbb dtcbb dehbb decbb dtstr dtauratio TtelChange TbbmirChange Additive Error RSS Error -0.2 190 210 230 250 270 290 310 330 Scene Temperature, K May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 15

GIFTS Calibration Errors-Shortwave GIFTS Radiometric Calibration: 2000 cm -1 0.4 0.2 0.0 dthbb dtcbb dehbb decbb dtstr dtauratio TtelChange TbbmirChange Additive Error RSS Error -0.2 240 260 280 300 320 Scene Temperature, K May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 16

Reproducibility-Longwave GIFTS Calibration Accuracy 1000 cm-1 Absolute Reproducibility 1.000 0.800 0.600 0.400 Reproducibility Requirement 0.200 0.000 190 210 230 250 270 290 310 330 Scene Temperature, K May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 17

Reproducibility-Shortwave GIFTS Calibration Accuracy 2000 cm-1 Absolute Reproducibility 1.000 0.800 0.600 0.400 0.200 Reproducibility Requirement 0.000 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 Scene Temperature, K May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 18

GIFTS Blackbody Requirements The derived In-flight calibrator subsystem requirements are: Temperature knowledge: ±0.1 K Emissivity knowledge: better than ±0.2% Temperature gradient : knowledge within 0.1 K GIFTS Instrument imposed requirements and allocations: Source Aperture: 2.54 cm Envelope: 8.0 cm Dia. X 14 cm long Operating Temperature: 265 to 300 K Mass (2 BB s and Controllers): < 2.4 kg Power (2 BB s and Controller): < 3.0 W May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 19

GIFTS In-flight Calibrator Baseline Design Enclosure MLI Blanket Insulation (not shown) Cavity Structural Support (thermal isolator) Aperture (2.5 cm) Electrical Connector Blackbody Cavity Circumferential Heater Thermistors: 2 redundant sets of four Paint surface is Chemglaze Z306 May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 20

GIFTS BB Block Diagram ABB Operationg Temperature HBB Operationg Temperatur 265 K 4 Thermistors 300 K 4 Thermistors T1-A T2-A T3-A T4-A T1-A T2-A T3-A T4-A Heater A BB 1 BB 2 Heater B T1-B T2-B T3-B T4-B T1-B T2-B T3-B T4-B 4 Thermistors 4 Thermistors Controller A Controller B Comm. Port May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 21

Blackbody Subsystem Heritage UW Developed AERI (groundbased) and S-HIS (aircraft) FTIR Instruments have demonstrated Radiometric Performance with accuracies better than 1 K. These programs have demonstrated the methodologies of integrating instrument Radiometric Models with Calibration Techniques and Error Budgets to produce the required radiometric accuracies. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 22

AERI Blackbody 2.70 IN. APERTURE BLACKBODY CAVITY HEATER CASE THERMISTORS (2 SENSE, 1 CONTROL) THERMAL INSULATION CAVITY SUPPORT (THERMAL ISOLATOR) THERMI STOR (APEX) ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR HANDLE May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 23

AERI / NIST Blackbody Intercomparison @ 333K, Max Error <0.05K @ 303K, Max Error <0.04K @ 293K, Max Error <0.02K May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 24

Summary - Radiometric Calibration In-flight radiometric calibration makes use of two small internal blackbody cavities (located near the field stop), plus a space view. A combination of the internal blackbodies and the space view allow tracking of any in-flight changes of the foreoptics transmission. Internal high-emissivity Blackbodies offer: Better absolute calibration Easier implementation - smaller range of pointing mirror angles May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 25

Spectral Calibration

GIFTS On-Orbit Spectral Calibration Philosophy Pre-flight spectral calibration parameters determined during ground calibration. Highly stable laser serves as an in-flight calibration reference. Verify in-flight using known atmospheric absorption lines. Discussion Topics In-flight wavenumber scale verification. The Instrument Line Shape (ILS) correction. Off-axis wavenumber scale renormalization. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 27

In-flight Wavenumber Scale Validation The GIFTS spectral scale is referenced to the on-board laser used to trigger interferogram sampling, as in a normal FTS. In a Michelson inteferometer, sampling at equal intervals in optical path delay leads (after Fourier Transform) to equal sampling in wavenumber. The actual wavenumber sampling interval depends on both the wavelength of the laser used to sample the interferogram and the angle between the path of the laser and the IR beam for each detector. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 28

GIFTS Spectral Calibration Requirements The effective radiometric errors associated with spectral calibration are included under the overall 1 K absolute calibration specification. An objective for GIFTS is to provide a laser stability better than 1 part in 10 6 (3 σ) over a month time period.» Simulated Errors due to wavenumber scale uncertainties: LW band ν = ν 1/10 6 SMW band ν = ν 1/10 6 mw/(m 2 sr cm -1 ) NEN = 0.2 NEN goal = 0.2 ν = ν 2/10 6 ν = ν 5/10 6 mw/(m 2 sr cm -1 ) ν = ν 2/10 6 ν = ν 5/10 6 NEN = 0.06 wavenumber wavenumber May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 29

LW band Tb T b (K) ν = ν 1/10 6 NEdT: 0.2 mw/(m 2 sr cm -1 ) at 280K ν = ν 2/10 6 T b Diff (K) ν = ν 5/10 6 wavenumber May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 30

SMW band Tb T b (K) ν = ν 1/10 6 NEdT: 0.06 mw/(m 2 sr cm -1 ) at 280K ν = ν 2/10 6 T b Diff (K) ν = ν 5/10 6 wavenumber May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 31

Example Spectral Calibration: S-HIS Atmospheric CO 2 lines from S-HIS and from using HITRAN2000. Observed wavenumber scale factor chosen to minimize difference with radiative transfer Calculation. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 32

Off-Axis GIFTS Focal Plane Array Angle

Self-Apodization due to finite detector size 1.00 Self- Apodization 0.99 0.0 OPD (cm) 0.9 Self-apodization effect is less than 1% for GIFTS detectors. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 34

Effect of Uncorrected ILS variations Equivalent temperature error less than 0.1K even without correction! May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 35

ILS Correction Process F In expression for the measured interferogram, F(x), expand sinc function as a power series of (2πνxbθ): ( x) dνn( ν) ( πxbθ ) ( ) ( 2πxbθ ) 2 4 2 2 = i2πνx 2 i2πνx e + 3! dνn ν ν e 5! dνn Compute perturbation terms and subtract from measured interferogram. 4 i πνx ( ν) ν e...» Similar process is currently performed for UW FTS airborne and ground based instruments (S-HIS/AERI). May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 36

Off-Axis Effects: Wavenumber Scale The beams of light reaching each detector in the focal plane array pass through the interferometer at different angles, φ. With respect to the on-axis beam, the off-axis beams have slightly shorter OPDs: OPD(φ) = OPD(0) cos(φ). The varying OPD scale across the focal plane array leads to slightly different wavenumber scales for each detector in the focal plane array. Ground processing will be used to interpolate the radiance spectrum from each pixel onto a reference wavenumber scale. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 37

Off-axis Effects FTS axis M 1 X/2 X X cos φ M 2 x 2 x 1 x2 x 1 φ OPD = x 1 - x 2 = X OPD = x 1 - x 2 = X cos φ On axis beam Off axis beam from Fourier Transform Spectrometry, James W. Brault May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 38

GIFTS Off-Axis Interferogram Sampling All sampled points lie on the same continuous interferogram May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 39

GIFTS Data Cube Simulation Image of interferogram point #780 (CO 2 resonance) Pixel # Pixel # May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 40

GIFTS Data Cube Simulation Image of interferogram point #1 (ZPD) Pixel # Pixel # May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 41

Summary - Spectral Calibration Primary issues to be addressed by the spectral calibration are ILS changes and wavenumber scale stretch across the array. ILS effects are negligible because of the small angular size of individual pixels. The wavenumber scale stretch variation over the array is large, but is physically well understood and can easily be removed. The spectral calibration will be routinely monitored using atmospheric emission lines during flight. Real-time ground data processing will produce a continuous stream of spectrally calibrated radiance observations on a standard wavenumber scale. May 1, 2002 SDL 2002 Calibration Conference 42