CRISM (Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars) on MRO. Calibration Upgrade, version 2 to 3

Similar documents
CRISM Instrument, Mission, and Data Set Description

MRO CRISM TRR3 Hyperspectral Data Filtering

Diffraction gratings. e.g., CDs and DVDs

Working with M 3 Data. Jeff Nettles M 3 Data Tutorial at AGU December 13, 2010

Dr. Larry J. Paxton Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, MD (301) (301) fax

Astronomy Announcements. Reduction/Calibration I 9/23/15

Introduction to Remote Sensing Wednesday, September 27, 2017

GEOG 4110/5100 Advanced Remote Sensing Lecture 2

IMAGING SPECTROMETER DATA CORRECTION

CRISM 2012 Data Users Workshop. MTRDR Data Analysis Walk-Through. K. Seelos, D. Buczkowski, F. Seelos, S. Murchie, and the CRISM SOC JHU/APL

Quality assessment of RS data. Remote Sensing (GRS-20306)

Spectroscopy techniques II. Danny Steeghs

Phoenix SSI Calibration Report, University of Arizona,

ENHANCEMENT OF DIFFUSERS BRDF ACCURACY

Correction and Calibration 2. Preprocessing

CRISM File Naming Convention Secret Decoder Ring

Improvements to Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite (OMPS) Sensor Data Record (SDR)

MODULE 3 LECTURE NOTES 3 ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTIONS

Description of NOMAD Observation Types and HDF5 Datasets NOT YET COMPLETE

Philpot & Philipson: Remote Sensing Fundamentals Interactions 3.1 W.D. Philpot, Cornell University, Fall 12

Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

Wat is licht, wat is meten? Belgisch Perspectief! Spectraal of niet-spectraal meten: that s the question

CrIS Full Spectral Resolution SDR and S-NPP/JPSS-1 CrIS Performance Status

SPICAM Archive Tutorial. Principal Investigator : J.L. Bertaux Archive Manager : A. Reberac

Shallow-water Remote Sensing: Lecture 1: Overview

Motivation. Aerosol Retrieval Over Urban Areas with High Resolution Hyperspectral Sensors

Overview of the EnMAP Imaging Spectroscopy Mission

CONTENTS. Quick Start Guide V1.0

Airborne Hyperspectral Imaging Using the CASI1500

CARBON NANOTUBE FLAT PLATE BLACKBODY CALIBRATOR. John C. Fleming

Interactive comment on Quantification and mitigation of the impact of scene inhomogeneity on Sentinel-4 UVN UV-VIS retrievals by S. Noël et al.

Interactive comment on Quantification and mitigation of the impact of scene inhomogeneity on Sentinel-4 UVN UV-VIS retrievals by S. Noël et al.

Vicarious Radiometric Calibration of MOMS at La Crau Test Site and Intercalibration with SPOT

Imaging and Deconvolution

CHRIS PROBA instrument

TOA RADIANCE SIMULATOR FOR THE NEW HYPERSPECTRAL MISSIONS: STORE (SIMULATOR OF TOA RADIANCE)

Outlier and Target Detection in Aerial Hyperspectral Imagery: A Comparison of Traditional and Percentage Occupancy Hit or Miss Transform Techniques

specular diffuse reflection.

Summary of Publicly Released CIPS Data Versions.

Preliminary validation of Himawari-8/AHI navigation and calibration

Real-world noise in hyperspectral imaging systems

Evaluation of Satellite Ocean Color Data Using SIMBADA Radiometers

Spectral and Radiometric Design of a 3- line CCD Camera for Mars Observation

Radiance, Irradiance and Reflectance

MonoVista CRS+ Raman Microscopes

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Introduction to Hyperspectral Data 2

10/2/2012 Corporate Headquarters 9390 Gateway Dr, Ste 100 Reno, NV p: f:

SAC-D/Aquarius. HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino. An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment

Control of Light. Emmett Ientilucci Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science 8 May 2007

Atmospheric correction of hyperspectral ocean color sensors: application to HICO

EECE5646 Second Exam. with Solutions

doi: / See next page.

Advanced Image Combine Techniques

Data products. Dario Fadda (USRA) Pipeline team Bill Vacca Melanie Clarke Dario Fadda

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Infrared Scene Simulation for Chemical Standoff Detection System Evaluation

Modeling of the ageing effects on Meteosat First Generation Visible Band

Aardobservatie en Data-analyse Image processing

E (sensor) is given by; Object Size

Reprint (R30) Accurate Chromaticity Measurements of Lighting Components. Reprinted with permission from Craig J. Coley The Communications Repair depot

GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER. Future of cal/val. K. Thome NASA/GSFC

Image Processing and Analysis

Comparison of Full-resolution S-NPP CrIS Radiance with Radiative Transfer Model

Lukas Paluchowski HySpex by Norsk Elektro Optikk AS

CSE 167: Introduction to Computer Graphics Lecture #6: Colors. Jürgen P. Schulze, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Fall Quarter 2013

FIFI-LS: Basic Cube Analysis using SOSPEX

Importing ASD-Spectra

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Multispectral Analysis of MASTER HDF Data 2

Testing Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Monitoring Techniques for Geological CO 2 Storage at Natural Seeps

FluxGage. FluxGage. LED Luminaire Measurement System User Manual

GOCI Post-launch calibration and GOCI-II Pre-launch calibration plan

EO-1 Stray Light Analysis Report No. 3

ENMAP RADIOMETRIC INFLIGHT CALIBRATION

Light Sources opmaak.indd :32:50

Automated Hyperspectral Target Detection and Change Detection from an Airborne Platform: Progress and Challenges

Kohei Arai 1 Graduate School of Science and Engineering Saga University Saga City, Japan

GEOG 4110/5100 Advanced Remote Sensing Lecture 4

IMAGING AND FIELD SPECTROMETER DATA S ROLE IN CALIBRATING CLIMATE-QUALITE SENSORS Kurtis, J. Thome NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD

Preprocessed Input Data. Description MODIS

LED Evenement 2014 Spectroscopy - Straylight. Avantes BV Apeldoorn, The Netherlands

PERFORMANCE REPORT ESTEC. The spectral calibration of JWST/NIRSpec: accuracy of the instrument model for the ISIM-CV3 test cycle

Detector systems for light microscopy

Colour Reading: Chapter 6. Black body radiators

Post processing field spectra in MATLAB Guidelines for the FSF Post Processing Toolbox

IASI spectral calibration monitoring on MetOp-A and MetOp-B

Light Tec. Characterization of ultra-polished surfaces in UV and IR. ICSO October 2016 Biarritz, France

S-NPP CrIS Full Resolution Sensor Data Record Processing and Evaluations

How GOSAT has provided uniform-quality spectra and optimized global sampling patterns for seven years

TracePro Stray Light Simulation

Fourier Transform Imaging Spectrometer at Visible Wavelengths

Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Lightning Imager (LI) instrument performance and calibration from user perspective

Polarization Ray Trace, Radiometric Analysis, and Calibration

UV-VIS Spectrophotometer

De-Shadowing of Satellite/Airborne Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imagery

Advanced modelling of gratings in VirtualLab software. Site Zhang, development engineer Lignt Trans

Throughput of an Optical Instrument II: Physical measurements, Source, Optics. Q4- Number of 500 nm photons per second generated at source

Class 11 Introduction to Surface BRDF and Atmospheric Scattering. Class 12/13 - Measurements of Surface BRDF and Atmospheric Scattering

Prof. Vidya Manian Dept. of Electrical l and Comptuer Engineering. INEL6007(Spring 2010) ECE, UPRM

CHRIS Proba Workshop 2005 II

SPIcam: an overview. Alan Diercks Institute for Systems Biology 23rd July 2002

Transcription:

CRISM (Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars) on MRO Calibration Upgrade, version 2 to 3 Dave Humm Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723 18 March 2012 1

Calibration Overview 2

Simplified Calibration Pipeline (1/3) All scene images are calibrated to radiance using internal calibrations to remove time-variable instrumental effects The first correction is to subtract shutter-closed dark measurements from the scene and from a sphere measurement taken close in time = Raw scene image, units DN Companion dark image, units DN Corrected scene image, units DN = Raw sphere image, units DN Companion dark image, units DN Corrected sphere image, units DN 3

Simplified Calibration Pipeline (2/3) The corrected scene and sphere images are both divided by exposure time to yield values linearly related to radiance The scene is ratioed to the sphere, multiplied by a ground-based model of the sphere's radiance, and divided by a flight-based flatfield The result is scene radiance / exp time Scene radiance, units W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 Corrected scene image, units DN * Ground-based model of sphere radiance, units W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 = / exp time Corrected sphere image, units DN Flight-based flatfield, unitless 4

Simplified Calibration Pipeline (2/3) The corrected scene and sphere images are both divided by exposure time to yield values linearly related to radiance The scene is ratioed to the sphere, multiplied by a ground-based model of the sphere's radiance, and divided by a flight-based flatfield The result is scene radiance Stray light corrections: VNIR scattered light IR spectral crosstalk / exp time Scene radiance, units W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 Corrected scene image, units DN * Ground-based model of sphere radiance, units W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 = / exp time Corrected sphere image, units DN Flight-based flatfield, unitless 5

Simplified Calibration Pipeline (2/3) The corrected scene and sphere images are both divided by exposure time to yield values linearly related to radiance The scene is ratioed to the sphere, multiplied by a ground-based model of the sphere's radiance, and divided by a flight-based flatfield The result is scene radiance updated v2 v3 / exp time Scene radiance, units W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 Corrected scene image, units DN * Ground-based model of sphere radiance, units W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 = / exp time Corrected sphere image, units DN Flight-based flatfield, unitless 6

Simplified Calibration Pipeline (3/3) To convert radiance to I/F, the solar flux at 1 AU is convolved with the bandpasses for each CRISM pixel The radiance is divided by the solar flux scaled to Mars' solar distance The result is I/F Scene radiance, units W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 * (solar distance in AU) 2 * π = Solar flux at 1 AU, units W m -2 µm -1 Scene I/F, unitless 7

Simplified Calibration Pipeline (3/3) To convert radiance to I/F, the solar flux at 1 AU is convolved with the bandpasses for each CRISM pixel The radiance is divided by the solar flux scaled to Mars' solar distance The result is I/F Scene radiance, units W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 RA TRDR IF TRDR Additional noise filtering in v3 * (solar distance in AU) 2 * π = Solar flux at 1 AU, units W m -2 µm -1 Scene I/F, unitless 8

Correction for shutter mirror nonrepeatability 9

Optics of v2 calibration nonrepeatability Shutter position nonrepeatable by < 0.1 degree Spectrometer view of sphere changes slightly Illumination of gratings and detectors changes 10

Spectrum of v2 calibration nonrepeatability (1 of 2) IR correction factor 1.12 1.1 1.08 1.06 1.04 1.02 1 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 0.9 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 VNIR correction factor 1.3 1.2 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 400 900 wavelength (nm) wavelength (nm) Zone boundary Order sorting filter zone boundaries Diffraction grating zones 11

Spectrum of v2 calibration nonrepeatability (2 of 2) The spectrum of the onboard calibration source is affected by tiny changes in the shutter mirror angle for different onboard calibrations. The diffraction gratings have zones with different spectral efficiency profiles, and a change in the pattern of illumination changes the relative contribution of the zones, changing the spectrometer efficiency. A small change in the angle of the shutter mirror will also change the angle of light arriving at the detector, slightly changing the shadows of the zone boundaries of the order sorting filters. The plots show correction factors derived from analysis of many flight calibration images with the sphere temperature and detector temperature fixed. The smooth function derives from filling the grating zones, and the sharp spikes from the shadows of the order sorting filter zone boundaries. In the v3 calibration for both VNIR and IR, the deviation of this correction factor from 1 is scaled according to the size of the VNIR order sorting filter artifact, and the correction factor is applied to the radiance model for the onboard source. CRISM bad bands occur at the 650 nm VNIR order sorting filter boundary, the VNIR/IR boundary at 1000 nm, and the 2700 nm IR filter boundary. Although the data are noisier at the other IR filter boundary at 1650 nm, the calibration is surprisingly effective, and these bands are not considered bad bands. 12

Spectral repeatability for Gusev (1 of 2) Repeated images were taken of Gusev Crater. A 51x51 pixel square was identified in each unmapped image, with the intent of repeating the same position. Spectra were compared using the median of each square. The scenes could have different lighting conditions, dust coverage, etc. 13

Spectral repeatability for Gusev (2 of 2) 2006_346/FRT35D0_TRR3 2007_351/FRT8CE1_TRR3 2008_265/FRTC9FB_TRR3 2008_281/FRTCDA5_TRR3 14

Spectral repeatability for Gusev (2 of 2) 2006_346/FRT35D0_TRR3 2007_351/FRT8CE1_TRR3 spirit 2008_265/FRTC9FB_TRR3 2008_281/FRTCDA5_TRR3 15

Repeatability for v2 and v3 (1 of 2) Normalized slope-corrected I/F 1.04 1.02 1 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 0.9 750 950 1150 1350 1550 1750 1950 2150 2350 Wavelength (nm) 35D0_S2 35D0_L2 8CE1_S2 8CE1_L2 C9FB_S2 C9FB_L2 CDA5_S2 CDA5_L2 Normalized slope-corrected I/F 1.04 1.02 1 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 0.9 750 950 1150 1350 1550 1750 1950 2150 2350 Wavelength (nm) 35D0_S3 35D0_L3 8CE1_S3 8CE1_L3 C9FB_S3 C9FB_L3 CDA5_S3 CDA5_L3 16

Repeatability for v2 and v3 (2 of 2) The I/F for each scene is scaled by a linear function which scales the v3 spectrum to 1 at 794 nm and 2198 nm. This accounts for variation in photometric angles and dust for the different scenes. The v3 repeatability is better but not perfect. Likewise, v3 VNIR/IR matching is better but not perfect. From this plot, it appears the 35D0 IR is undercorrected, but since the plot is scaled to make the spectra agree at 794 nm, the mismatch could just as well be from the VNIR side. Note changes from v2 to v3 at 1100 nm and 1750-1900 nm. Note v3 I/F is typically a bit higher than v2 above 1600 nm. Note the spectra still appear noisy at the 1% and less level, even with 51x51 median applied. See, for example, the VNIR spectra <1000 nm. This is typically not random noise but rather residual calibration artifacts, and one must be careful interpreting narrow features <1% in depth. 17

Empirical corrections 18

Laboratory and empirical corrections CRISM I/F for a scene from the Olympus Mons summit, 100-column median Laboratory water vapor correction Deimos-based approx -4% I/F adjustment > 2 microns Deimos-based empirical correction Empirical correction based on Olympus Mons summit images; 46A1 for v2 and 7901 for v3 I/F I/F v2 2008_292/FRTD001 100-column median spectrum 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Wavelength (nm) v3 2008_292/FRTD001 100-column median spectrum 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Wavelength (nm) 19

Other modifications and bad bands 0.3 v2 2008_292/FRTD001 100-column median spectrum CRISM I/F for a scene from the Olympus Mons summit, 100-column median Flight-based flat field set equal to zero Modified stray light subtraction Bad bands I/F I/F 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Wavelength (nm) v3 2008_292/FRTD001 100-column median spectrum 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Wavelength (nm) 20

Changes in flight-derived flat field Flight-derived flat field Flat field is derived from special nadir-looking (gimbal fixed) observations designated FFC Flat field is median of lines in multiple images Some wavelengths are excluded to avoid interaction of instrument smile with deep, narrow atmospheric spectral features Version 2 calibration Flat field derived from a small number of FFC images selected for crosstrack uniformity, 2 full-resolution hyperspectral images and 3 10x binned multispectral images Fewer wavelengths excluded from flat field Version 3 calibration Flat field derived from the median of all lines of a large number of FFC images with no selection, 169 full-resolution hyperspectral images and 56 10x binned multispectral images Larger range of wavelengths excluded near 2 microns, and wavelengths near 1440 nm CO2 feature excluded 21