TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Young Drivers Report the Highest Level of Phone Involvement in Crash or Near-Crash Incidences. Research Note

Similar documents
CHART BOOK: HAND-HELD MOBILE DEVICE USE TRENDS FOR MISSISSIPPI ADULTS

PRESS RELEASE. Manteca Police Department to Step Up Enforcement for Distracted Drivers

The Rise of the Connected Viewer

N.J. drivers continue to roll the dice with safety

Traffic Safety Facts Research Note

ITSMR RESEARCH NOTE EFFECTS OF CELL PHONE USE AND OTHER DRIVER DISTRACTIONS ON HIGHWAY SAFETY: 2006 UPDATE. Introduction SUMMARY

Distracted Driving on the Capital Beltway

ITSMR Research Note KEY FINDINGS. Crash Analyses: Ticket Analyses:

Smartphone Ownership 2013 Update

Distracted Driving. Applicable Regulations. Introduction/Overview

Distracted Driving & Voice-to-Text Overview. Christine Yager Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Distracted Driving Attitudes and Behaviors Survey Final Results Report Bend, Oregon 2015

Distracted Driving Education for High School Students. Despina Stavrinos, PhD & Benjamin McManus

Survey Questions and Methodology

Survey Questions and Methodology

The Growing Gap between Landline and Dual Frame Election Polls

Mobile Access July 7, 2010 Aaron Smith, Research Specialist.

A Study of Distracted Driving in New Jersey 2016

ITSMR Research Note. Crashes Involving Cell Phone Use and Distracted Driving KEY FINDINGS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION. Crash Analyses.

Spring Change Assessment Survey 2010 Final Topline 6/4/10 Data for April 29 May 30, 2010

The Smartphone Consumer June 2012

Driving Distractions in New York City. A Study Conducted by Students at Hunter College, The City University of New York

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

Fatigue and distraction through mobile phone use Results of the BIVV/IBSR three-yearly road safety attitude survey

Georgia Struck-By Alliance presents Highway Work Zone Safety Stand Down. Work Zone Safety: We re All in This Together

Distracted Driving- A Review of Relevant Research and Latest Findings

Customer Insights Customer Insights

The Demographics of Mobile News Habits

August Tracking Survey 2011 Final Topline 8/30/2011

APPENDIX G: Biennial Exhibition Device Survey Questions

Almost half of all internet users now use search engines on a typical day

Distracted Driving U.S. Federal Initiatives. Amy Schick, MS, CHES Office of Impaired Driving and Occupant Protection

Road Safety, Distracted Driving and Cell Phone Usage

DriveTAB is a hardware based, tamper resistant solution to Distracted

Study: Even hands-free devices prove too distracting for drivers

Cell phones and American adults

Research Report: Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)

Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance DISTRACTIVE DRIVING

Telephone Survey Response: Effects of Cell Phones in Landline Households

Customers are Texting You

STATEMENT OF AAA NEW YORK STATE BEFORE THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION ALBANY, NEW YORK FEBRUARY 13, 2012

NANOS SURVEY NANOS SURVEY

2014 REPORT. Distracted Driving. on I-95 in Northern Virginia

Better connections: Australian attitudes to mail and . November 2013

Unisys Security Insights: Australia A Consumer Viewpoint 2015

Distracted Driving: Avoid Becoming A Statistic

November 2016 G. Oscar Anderson, Senior Research Advisor AARP Research

Ingenieur- und Verkehrspsychologie

Don t Drive Distracted. Attorney Joe Troy

PANEL 1 EVIDENCE FOR GDL LAWS ON PASSENGER RESTRICTIONS, CELLPHONE RESTRICTIONS, AND PRIMARY SEAT BELT USE FOR ALL TEENAGE PASSENGERS

Road and Street Maintenance Supervisors Conference

DISCOVERABILITY. How Canadians Find TV Content

Disrupting the Personal Lives

Outside of Working Hours Not a Burden to US Workers

86.1% of the population aged 16 to 74 have used the Internet in the last three months. 72.1% do it on a daily basis

84.6% of the population aged 16 to 74 has used the Internet in the last three months. 69.0% use it everyday

Telecommunications Customer Satisfaction

RRFSS 2012: Cell Phone Use and Texting While Driving

WORKSHOP: Using the Health Survey for England, 2014

Distracted Driving Accident Claims Involving Mobile Devices Special Considerations and New Frontiers in Legal Liability

Des Moines Area Regional Transit Non Rider Survey

Annual Gadgets Survey Final Topline 4/21/06

BY Aaron Smith and Kenneth Olmstead

THE STATE OF ONLINE VIDEO 2017

AMERICANS USE OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: AN AARP BULLETIN SURVEY

DATA MEMO. The volume of spam is growing in Americans personal and workplace accounts, but users are less bothered by it.

A Look in the (Driver s) Mirror: Use of Portable Electronic Devices While Driving by the Driver Safety Research Community

Objectives DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Washington Driver Survey Distracted Driving Attitudes & Behavior

Amy Schick NHTSA, Occupant Protection Division April 7, 2011

DATA MEMO. BY: PIP Senior Research Fellow Deborah Fallows ( )

Let s take a closer look at the standard deviation.

A STUDY OF NEW JERSEY DISTRACTED DRIVING

Review of distracted driving factors. George Yannis, Associate Professor, NTUA

Driving While Distracted

Use of Online for Telecommunications Services

The Do s and Don ts of Cell PhoneUse for School Bus Drivers

Connected Devices and The Internet of Things

Seatbelt and Mobile Phone Usage Survey Scotland, 2014

MSMC PRESENTS. Distracted Driving Laws in Michigan Talking to Our Kids. (800)

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS

AVOID DISTRACTIONS WHILE DRIVING

Consumer Preferences in Narrowband Communications Research Report

DRIVER DISTRACTION FROM CELL PHONE USE AND POTENTIAL FOR SELF-LIMITING BEHAVIOR CAROL A. C. FLANNAGAN SHAN BAO KATHLEEN D. KLINICH

Gregory M. Fitch, Ph.D. AAMVA AIC August 22, 2011

MOBILE SECURITY. Fixing the Disconnect Between Employer and Employee for BYOD (Bring Your Own Device)

Comreg Study. (August 2016) For more information, contact Oisin Byrne, Managing Director Phone:

Why driving while using hands-free cell phones is risky behavior. Drivers through Better Training

New Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies

Alaska no no all drivers primary. Arizona no no no not applicable. primary: texting by all drivers but younger than

Presentation to Distracted Driving Conference. October, 2005

CELLULAR TELEPHONE USE POLICY

Worst-Case Scenarios. Your Hosted VoIP Provider Should Be Ready For. Brought to you by

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics

Mobile calls to 13 numbers Research report JULY 2014

Mail Findings. Australia Post Consumer Survey. Research into consumer preferences of transactional communications

2012 Cell Phone Consumer Attitudes Study

Sky Mobile Launch. December 2016

FINDING FOCUS ON THE ROAD

Transcription:

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS Research Note DOT HS 811 611 April 2012 Young Drivers Report the Highest Level of Phone Involvement in Crash or Near-Crash Incidences In the first nationally representative telephone survey on distracted driving, NHTSA reported attitudes and behaviors of 6,000 drivers 18 and older from all 50 States and the District of Columbia about distracted driving. This research note extracts information from the December 2011 survey about cell phone use and distracted driving for young drivers. A person was considered a driver if he or she had driven in the past year. The survey used a random-digit-dialing procedure to select one eligible driver within each eligible household and oversampled people 18 to 34 on both landlines and cell phones. The full report contains a description of the survey methodology. Young Drivers Report More Crashes While Using Cell Phones Overall, 6% of respondents reported having been in a crash in the past year; 7% were in a near-crash; and the majority (86%) reported no crash. Men have slightly more crash or near-crash incidences than women (15% versus 12%, respectively). Young drivers 18 to 20 have the highest incidence of crash or near-crash experience (23%) compared to all other age groups, and drivers 65 and older have the lowest (). Young drivers report almost twice as many crashes (17%) as the next highest group, those 21- to 24-year-olds (9%), and up to four times as many crashes as the other age groups (4% 6%). Figure 1 shows the crash and near-crash experience by sex and age. Most drivers in the survey had not been in a crash or near-crash, but of the 718 drivers who were (males 14.9%, females 12.4%), 6% report that they were using a phone at the time: 4% were talking, 1% were sending a text message or e-mail, and 1% were reading a text message or e-mail. Women report slightly higher phone involvement than men in crashes and near- crashes (7% versus 5%, respectively). Young drivers 18 to 20 report the highest level of phone involvement (13%) at the time of a crash or near-crash; said they were sending a text or e-mail, 3% were reading a text or e-mail, and 2% said they were talking on a cell phone. Drivers 25 to 34 reported talking on the phone at the time of the crash or near crash (1) more than any other age group. Most Drivers Report That Using a Cell Phone While Driving Makes No Difference on Their Driving but Texting or E-mailing Does When asked how their driving is different when talking on the phone, at least half of all drivers report that talking on a phone makes no difference on their driving performance, and this increases to 6 of drivers under age 35 thinking it makes no difference. Two out of 10 drivers say they drive slower. Table 1 shows the percentages. When asked about the impact of sending text messages or e-mails while driving, however, 25% of all drivers said it makes no difference. About of young drivers 18 to 20 years old thought sending text messages or e-mails made no difference on their driving, compared to 27% 29% for drivers 21 to 34. More drivers reported that they drive slower, with about one-third of males and one-quarter of females reporting this. Young drivers 18 to 20 were more likely to say that they drive slower as a consequence of texting or e-mailing than older drivers (37% versus 26% 3). Few drivers recognize that they sometimes drift out of the lane while talking on a phone (virtually none) or texting (2%) while driving. Younger drivers under 25 were more likely to report that they drift out of the lane or roadway (9% to 15%) when texting than older drivers (3% to 5%). Table 2 shows the percentages.

2 Figure 1 Crash or Near-Crash Involvement as a Driver In the Past Year, by and Age, Percent 1 16% 14% 12% 1 6% 4% 2% Have you been involved in a crash or near-crash as a driver in the past year? Near-crash Crash Figure 2 Cell Phone Use at the Time of the Last Crash or Near- Crash, by and Age, Percentage 12% 1 6% 4% 2% Were you using a cell phone at the time of the LAST [crash/near-crash] you were in? Talking Reading text/e-mail Sending text/e-mail Male Female 18-20 21-24 25-34 35-44 45-64 65+ Male Female 18-20 21-24 25-34 35-44 45-64 65+ Figure 1 data Data Table (Percentage) Near-crash 8.4 6.2 5.9 7.5 9.2 7.0 7.9 4.0 Crash 6.5 6.2 17.0 9.2 6.0 6.6 5.7 3.8 No crash 85.1 87.6 77.1 83.2 84.8 86.4 86.5 92.2 (N) (2,854) (2,975) (271) (346) (1,087) (773) (2,490) (745) Figure 2 data Data Table (Percentage) Yes, talking 3.2 4.4 1.6 0.0 9.9 5.4 2.0 0.0 Yes, reading a text/ e-mail message 0.8 1.2 3.3 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.7 2.2 Yes, sending a text/ e-mail message 1.1 1.2 8.2 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 No 95.0 93.3 86.9 100.0 88.2 94.6 96.7 97.8 (N) (377) (341) (61) (48) (161) (92) (302) (46)

3 Table 1 How Talking on a Phone Affects Driving, by and Age, Percentage (Multiple Responses) Effects No difference 55.1 52.4 60.8 63.0 57.3 51.9 50.5 50.9 Drive slower 19.3 21.3 14.4 14.8 23.1 20.1 21.0 17.2 Drive faster 0.6 1.5 1.9 3.1 2.7 0.5 0.1 0.4 Change lanes less frequently 1.4 1.6 4.3 0.8 1.4 2.4 1.1 0.9 Drift out of lane/roadway 1.3 0.2 0.0 2.3 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.4 (N) (1,896 (1,919) (209) (257) (873) (593) (1,596 (233) Table 2 How Texting/E-Mailing Affects Driving, by and Age, Percentage (Multiple Responses) Effects * No difference 24.2 25.8 19.6 27.0 29.5 19.6 24.1 n/a Drive slower 36.4 25.3 37.1 30.2 26.9 31.3 34.6 n/a Drift out of lane/roadway 8.2 5.8 9.3 15.1 5.3 2.7 4.4 n/a Change lanes more frequently 2.4 2.1 7.2 0.8 2.6 0.9 0.0 n/a (N) (376) (329) (97) (126) (227) (112) (136) * *sample is too small for respondents 65 and older. Young Drivers Send More Text Messages or E-mails While Driving When asked about sending text messages or e-mails while driving, 1 of drivers reported ever doing so, and males and females showed a similar incidence (19% males, 17% females). Figure 3 shows that drivers under 24 are much more likely to text while driving (44% to 49%) than older drivers. In fact, after age 25, the incidence of texting while driving drops with every age group, from 26% in the 25- to 34-year-olds to less than 1% in those 65 and older. Figure 4 shows that among those who do text while driving, the majority of drivers of all ages continue to drive while texting. The highest rate of continue to drive is seen in the youngest group with 73% of those 18 to 20 continuing to drive while they text compared to 62% to 6 for other age groups. Drivers under 25 are less likely to pull over then send (6% to 9%) than those 25 and older (range 7% to 21%). Drivers 21 to 24 are slightly more likely to hand the phone to a passenger (17% compared to 9% 14%). Few drivers of any age use a voice command. The sample size was too small for drivers 65 and older. Figure 3 Percentage Sending Text Messages or E-Mails While Driving, by and Age (Percentage Ever) Do you ever SEND text messages or e-mails when you are driving? 6 5 4 3 1 19% Male 17% 44% 49% 26% 19% 0.4% Female 18-20 21-24 25-34 35-44 45-64 65+

4 Figure 4 Usual Manner of Sending Text Messages or E-mails While Driving, by and Age, Percent 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 If you SEND text messages or e-mails while driving, do you USUALLY... Continue to Drive Pull Over Then Send Hand Phone to Passenger 18-20 21-24 25-34 35-44 45-64 Use a Voice Command Drivers Continue to Drive While Using Their Cell Phones Most drivers answer incoming calls and continue to drive. About two-thirds of young drivers 18 to 20 (6) answer and continue to drive, slightly higher than the 45-to 64-year-old drivers (6) or 65+ drivers (44%), and lower than the 25- to 34-year-old drivers (7) in 2010. At least one-third of all drivers hold the phones in their hands while they answer the incoming call, and this increases with each age group, reaching 62% for the oldest drivers. Another one-third of young drivers use cell phone speakers when they answer and drive, and this gradually decreases with each age group, down to for the oldest drivers. About of all drivers use hands-free earpieces, and up to 1 of the oldest drivers have built-in car systems. Figure 5 Percentage of Respondents Answering and Making Calls While Driving by and Age (all, most, or some driving trips) Young Drivers Less Likely to Say Something to a Driver Who Is Using a Cell Phone When asked as passengers how they would feel about different situations, almost all respondents (about 9 overall) reported that they considered a driver who was sending text messages or e-mails or reading e-mails or text messages as very unsafe. Only about two-thirds of young drivers 18 to 20, felt very unsafe if their drivers were sending messages, and this steadily increased in each age group, reaching 9 in the oldest group. Less than half (4) of all respondents were likely to say something if the driver was talking on a hand-held cell phone while driving and this almost doubles (76%) for a driver sending an e-mail or text message. Young drivers were less likely than older drivers to speak up. About one-third of young drivers 18 to 20 and 21 to 24 would say something to the driver who was talking on a handheld, whereas about half of drivers 65+ would speak up. More young drivers would say something to a driver who was sending a text message or e-mail while driving and this steadily increases with age, starting with about half of those under 25 (56%, 52%) and increasing to 8 for drivers 45 and older (see Figure 6). Figure 6 As a Passenger, How Likely Are You to Say Something if Your Driver Is, by and Age (Percentage Very Likely) 10 8 6 4 Talking on handheld Sending messages Male Female 18-20 21-24 25-34 35-44 45-64 65+ 10 8 6 4 Answer Make Male Female 18-20 21-24 25-34 35-44 45-64 65+

5 Summary About two-thirds (6) of young drivers 18 to 20 are willing to answer incoming phone calls on some, most, or all driving trips, and most continue to drive, at slightly higher rates than older drivers. Young drivers 18 to 20 have the highest incidence of selfreported crash or near-crash experiences compared to all other age groups and the highest incidence of phone involvement at the time of the crash or near-crash. Like older drivers, most young drivers do not think that talking on a phone while driving affects their driving performance. When it comes to texting while driving, only about 1 out of 5 young drivers think that texting makes no difference to their driving performance. Young drivers under 25 were more aware than older age groups that they drift out of the lane or roadway and were more likely to report that they drive slower when texting. Drivers under 25 are much more likely to text while driving than all other age groups, and the incidence of texting while driving drops with every age group to less than 1% for those 65 and older. For those who text while driving, most continue to drive. Young drivers are less likely to pull over then send their messages than older age groups, but sometimes hand the phone to a passenger. Young drivers are less likely to say something to a driver who is sending a text message while driving than older age groups. Link to full report: Tison, J., Chaudhary, N., & Cosgrove, L. (2011, December). National phone survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors. (DOT HS 811 555). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Available at www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/pdf/811555.pdf. www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/traffic_tech/tt407.pdf. This research note and other general information on highway traffic safety may be accessed by Internet users at: www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/cats/index.aspx 8698-041612-v1a