ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar documents
A STUDY ON SMART PHONE USAGE AMONG YOUNGSTERS AT AGE GROUP (15-29)

Exploring Persuasiveness of Just-in-time Motivational Messages for Obesity Management

The Chest Wall Center at Cincinnati Children s Patient Questionnaire

Media centre Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones

Sandy Le & Tyson-Phit Singvongsa. A World Of Pain. Are you dead Siri-ous about your health?

EYECARE REGISTRATION AND HISTORY

A survey on prevalence and affect of earphone usage among adolescents

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Effects on Human Beings Review

Witwer Children s Therapy Medical History Questionnaire

Are Mobile Phones Driving Us Apart?

A Statistical Study on Phone Usage and Its Impacts

ijcrr Vol 04 issue 09 Category: Research Received on:06/03/12 Revised on:17/03/12 Accepted on:28/03/12

Watch out for iphones! Hrinshtein, M.M. Annotation. Introduction What is better?

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Corresponding Author. Citation. Article Cycle. Abstract. Keywords. Introduction

APPENDIX G: Biennial Exhibition Device Survey Questions

The Rise of the Connected Viewer

Mental Health, Depression, Anxiety and Stress: A Comparison Between Students Using Smart Phones and Basic phones

Cell Phones: Do Concerns Outweigh the Benefits? As cell phone usage rates continue to sky-rocket higher and higher each year, more concerns are

I will cause your brain to shrink...

South Central Power Notification Effectiveness Study. Study conducted by Metrix Matrix

Are mobile phones dangerous?

Cordless Phone EMFs Trigger Heart Rhythm Abnormalities

Proceed With Caution. BJHS 9 th Grade E-Cybermission Project

New Student-Athlete Checklist

The Impact of Wireless in How We LIVE, WORK and PLAY Presented by Julia Johnson President, NetCommunications

Report in English: Topic: Are mobile phones dangerous?? Introduction: Our nice black things are beaming (strahlen) at us

IF IS FOR OLD PEOPLE, ARE UNDERGRADUATES OLD PEOPLE?

ehealth literacy and Cancer Screening: A Structural Equation Modeling

A STUDY OF CUSTOMER DEFECTION IN CELLULAR SERVICES IN INDIA

Searching within EBSCO databases. Urszula Nowicka Training Specialist EBSCO Information Service Phone: (+48)

Relationship of Mobile Phone Usage and GPA among the Undergraduate Students at the University of the West Indies - Mona Campus

Distracted Driving Education for High School Students. Despina Stavrinos, PhD & Benjamin McManus

PART 1. Unit 1: Mania 9. Unit 2: Spam 15. Unit 3: Fraud 21. Unit 4: Lingo 27. Unit 5: Breakups 33

Chapter-10 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

THE GROWTH OF SMARTPHONE USAGE AMONG STUDENT

Writing a two-sided argument essay Topic: Mobile phones health risk

CASE HISTORY FORM Psychologist

To Study the Usage & Awareness of M- Commerce and its services with reference to Nagpur City

CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY

Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio

Data Analysis using SPSS

Website Usability Study: The American Red Cross. Sarah Barth, Veronica McCoo, Katelyn McLimans, Alyssa Williams. University of Alabama

McLean BASIS plus TM. Sample Hospital. Report for April thru June 2012 BASIS-24 APR-JUN. McLean Hospital

WORKSHOP: Using the Health Survey for England, 2014

Usability Testing. November 14, 2016

Engage Patients on the #1 Platform for Doctor-Patient Connections. Display Advertising Media Kit 2018

IOO/Specialty Cross Reference

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Young Drivers Report the Highest Level of Phone Involvement in Crash or Near-Crash Incidences. Research Note

Getting Acquainted with PsycINFO (EBSCOhost)

MI LAST NAME DATE OF BIRTH GENDER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE MI LAST NAME DATE OF BIRTH GENDER

New Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies

TRUSTED MOBILITY INDEX

International Journal of Current Research and Modern Education (IJCRME) Impact Factor: 6.725, ISSN (Online): (

If you knew the #1 killer in American teenagers, would you try to stop it?

I. INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

New Student-Athlete Checklist

The American Association of Behavioral and Social Sciences Journal (The AABSS Journal, 2011, Volume 15)

2 ICT in Aruba introduction Central Bureau of Statistics Aruba

The Use and Effects of Smartphones in Higher Education

The Mode of Invitation for Web Surveys

Survey Questions and Methodology

LAWRENCE D. SCHUSTER, M.D., PH.D., F.A.C.P., F.A.C.E Central Office 255 PINEHURST BLDG, 4999 FRANCE AVE S., MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410

CHAPTER - 7 MARKETING IMPLICATIONS, LIMITATIONS AND SCOPE FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

Survey Questions and Methodology

MHealth - The Future of Mental Health Care

NEW PATIENT HISTORY FORM. Name: Main Reasons for coming to the office: Duration of Problem (when did it first start?):

Customers Response to Mobile Number Portability with Special Reference to Vodafone Customers in Rajakkad

Economic Evaluation of ehealth in Japan

THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MOBILE HEALTH MALAYSIA & THAILAND

Smartphone Ownership 2013 Update

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 ( 2015 ) WCES 2014

Usability Evaluation of Cell Phones for Early Adolescent Users

A TEXT MINER ANALYSIS TO COMPARE INTERNET AND MEDLINE INFORMATION ABOUT ALLERGY MEDICATIONS Chakib Battioui, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY

Mobile phone exposures in children

5.2 Functions as Graphs

Position you are applying for: Days Nights Mon Fri 4 on 4 off ... Nationality:...

Evaluating Three Scrutability and Three Privacy User Privileges for a Scrutable User Modelling Infrastructure

Adult History Form. Personal Information. Name: Birthdate: Age: Social Security number: Street Address: Cell:

Electromagnetic Radiation from Mobile Phones and their base stations: Health Effects

PAKISTAN HOW TO SPEED UP THE INTRODUCTION OF EHEALTH SERVICES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Shadow IT in the Enterprise

Usability and Evaluation of BCKOnline PORTAL Prototype Early breast cancer Recurrent Advanced

Radio Frequency Radiation What is it? What are the health risks of exposure? Thomas Engel

IMPACT OF MOBILE PHONE: A STUDY IN TARAI REGION OF UTTARAKHAND ARPITA SHARMA

Data Mining. ❷Chapter 2 Basic Statistics. Asso.Prof.Dr. Xiao-dong Zhu. Business School, University of Shanghai for Science & Technology

Study of Thumb Muscles to Determine Optimum Screen Size for One Hand Mobile Phone Use

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences INTRODUCTION TO SPSS SPSS for Windows Version 16.0: Its first version in 1968 In 1975.

Learning and Development. UWE Staff Profiles (USP) User Guide

HISTORY OF THE INJURY:

Exposure of 3G and 4G Mobile Phone Radiations on Blood Tissues

Medicare Annual Wellness Visit Questionnaire 1} 3} 5} 2} 4} 6} 1} 3) 5) 2) 4) 6) 1} 4) 2} 5) Date: Name: LAST FIRST MIDDLE

UK COSMOS PARTICIPANT NEWSLETTER FEBRUARY 2014

Blackberry Addiction in Sekolah Bogor Raya

Symptom Checker API v1.2 Documentation

8: Statistics. Populations and Samples. Histograms and Frequency Polygons. Page 1 of 10

4. Descriptive Statistics: Measures of Variability and Central Tendency

University of Minnesota Twin Cities Degrees Awarded by Major - Five Years

2016 Member Needs Survey Results

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

Research on the Development Law of Smart Phone Screen based on User Experience

Transcription:

Journal of Chitwan Medical College 2016; 6(18): 47-53 Available online at: www.jcmc.cmc.edu.np ISSN 2091-2889 (Online) ISSN 2091-24 (Print) JOURNAL OF CHITWAN MEDICAL COLLEGE JCMC ESTD 2010 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE KNOWLEDGE REGARDING HARMFUL EFFECTS ON CELL PHONE USE AMONG HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS BHARATPUR CHITWAN, NEPAL S GAUTAM 1, J SHAKYA 1 * 1 College of Nursing, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Chitwan *Correspondence to: Ms. Jayalaxmi Shakya, College of Nursing, Chitwan Medical College Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal. Email: shakyajaya@yahoo.com. ABSTRACT There is no doubt that the cell phone is a very useful today, cell phones are a major part of society. It eases communication with colleagues, friends and relatives. But every technology that provides such benefits comes with consequences. The effect of cell phones on youth and society is excessive. A descriptive cross-sectional study was used to identify the knowledge regarding harmful effects on cell phone use among higher secondary school students. The study population consisted of 70 higher secondary school students of Saptagandaki Multiple College, Bharatpur10, Chitwan. Non-probability purposive sampling technique was used to select the college and faculty.whereas, out of 5 students, 70 students were selected respectively by using simple random sampling technique from the lottery method. Data was analyzed by using SPSS and various tests frequency, mean, median, percentage and standard deviation and the findings were presented in tables. Chi-square test as inferential statistics was used to analyze the associations between the independent and dependent variables. The study findings revealed that out of the 70 respondents, 24 (34.3%) respondents were in the age of 17 years and 3 (4.3%) respondents were in age of 15 years. The mean age was 17.31 with standard deviation of 1.04. Similarly regarding the sex 45 (64.3%) were male and 25 (35.7%) were female. Respondents have good level of knowledge regarding harmful effects of cell phone as it causes addiction on cell phone 90.0% but have average level of knowledge as it causes headache 78.6%, gradual loss of hearing 77.1%, eye strain 70.0%, dizziness 71.4%, skin allergy 71.45%, risk for breast cancer 75.7% and have poor level of knowledge as it causes dry eye 47.1%, warmness around ear 35.7%, decrease fertility rate 22.9%, tiredness if used after lights out. Out of 70 respondents, 53 (75.7%) of respondents answered risk for breast cancer is the harmful effects of cell phone if kept on chest region, and 20 (28.6%) answered chest injury. The level of knowledge regarding harmful effects on cell phone use is statistically not- significant with age (p=0.1), sex (p=0.943), faculty (p=0.632), grade (p=0.490) and previous experience (p=0.311).the study concluded that the some educational intervention need to lunch by institution in order to enhance the awareness among higher secondary school students. Key words: Adolescence, Cell phone, Harmful effect, Knowledge. INTRODUCTION Adolescence is the period of transition, the time when physiological, psychological and social development takes place. The adolescents are large in number and are the citizens of tomorrow. 1 A mobile telephone or cellular telephone is a longrange, portable electronic device used for mobile communication. In addition to the standard voice function of a telephone, current mobile phones can support many additional services such as SMS for text messaging, e-mail, pocket switching for access to the Internet, and MMS for sending and receiving photos and video. 2 Nowadays technology is advancing and widening rapidly as per the needs of the generation that helps the people of the current world to perform each and every task at a fast pace. Any technology is useful if it is properly used. Cell phone is one of therecent advancements that influenced and captured the minds of people irrespective of all age groups. Back 2016, JCMC. All Rights Reserved 47

in 1980, the number of cell phones in the world was no need to minimize the unwanted effects. 7 a mere 11.2 million or 2 cell phones/1000 people. An article was published on the topic Is cell phone Over last few years 61% of global population now radiation bad for our eyes? which revealed that using cell phones i.e., around the world, there are according to German science study, a cell phone more than 2.4 billion cell phone users and more has been linked to cancer of the eyes, using a cell than 1000 new customers are added every minute. 3 phone may increases chances of getting eye cancer 48 In Chandigarh, India, a study on audio logic disturbances in long-term mobile phone users found that high-frequency loss and absent distortion product otoacoustic emissions were observed with an increase in the duration of mobile phone use. The study concluded that Long-term and intensive mobile phone use may cause 80% of inner ear damage. 4 The impact of cell phone use on social networking and development showed that 99% owned cell phones and nearly 90% have had cell phones for more than three years. Excessive internet use, along with pathological gambling and addictive disorder, health risk from cell phone radiation and cell phone dependency are the major social impacts found in teenagers. The study concluded that there is a negative impact of cell phone use on social networking among adolescents. 5 In Iran, a study on effects of mobile phone radiofrequency on the structure and function of the normal human hemoglobin found that mobile phone electromagnetic frequencies altered oxygen affinity and tertiary structure of Hemoglobin. Furthermore, the research concluded that decrease of oxygen affinity of Hemoglobin corresponded to the electromagnetic frequencies intensity and time of exposure. 6 Among the Malaysian students in medical school found that 4 subjects were aware of the side effects of mobile phone usage. (78 females and 46 males were aware of the hazards) Out of the 4 subjects who were aware of the side effects, 5% of the males and 10% of the females felt that there is by 300%. 8 MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was designed to find out the knowledge regarding harmful effects on cell phone use among higher secondary school students. The study population consisted of 70 higher secondary school students of Saptagandaki Multiple College, Bharatpur10, Chitwan. Non-probability purposive sampling technique was used to select the college and faculty.out of 5 students 70 students were selected respectively by using simple random sampling technique from the lottery method. After the administrative approval from concerned authorities of Saptagandaki Multiple College, the data collection was done by using semi-structured self administered questionnaire.the respondents themselves attempted the questionnaire regarding the study. Data was analyzed by using SPSS and various tests frequency, mean, median, percentage and standard deviation and Chi -square test as inferential statistics was used to analyze the association between the independent and dependent variables. The findings were presented in tables. 2016, JCMC. All Rights Reserved

RESULTS Table 1: Respondents Socio Demographic Characteristics (n= 70) AGE 15 16 17 18 19 Mean ± SD : 17.31 ± 1.04 SEX male female GRADE 11 3 24 22 9 45 25 30 40 4.3 17.1 34.3 31.4.9 64.3 35.7 42.9 57.1 Table 2: Respondents Information Regarding Use of Cell Phone, Duration and Frequency (n = 70) Variables Freq. Percentage Durations in years 1 2 3 4 5 Frequency in hours <5 5-10 >10 Mean+ SD=4.43+ 3.25 17 28 8 5 6 24.3 40.0 17.1 11.4 7.1 71.4 20.0 8.6 Table 2 shows that, regarding use of the cell phone cent percent respondents were using their cell phone. Among them, 28 (40.0%) of respondents were using their cell phone since 2 years, and 5 ( 7.1%) respondents were using cell phone since 5 years. Mean ± SD = 1.57 ± 0.49 FACULTY Science Management 35 35 Regarding the frequency of cell phone use, (71.4%) of respondents use their cell phone less than five hours per day only 6 (8.6%) of respondents use their cell phone for more than ten hours. The mean frequency of use was 4.43 with standard deviation of 3.25. Table 1 reveals that out of the 70 respondents, 24 (34.3%) respondents were in the age of 17 years and 3 (4.3%) respondents were in age of 15 years. The mean age was 17.31 with standard deviation of 1.04.Similarly regarding the sex 45 (64.3%) were male and 25 (35.7%) were female. Likewise 30 (42.9%) were studying in grade 11 and 40 (57.1%) were studying in grade. Half of the respondents 35 (%) were studying in the science faculty and half of the respondents 35 (%) were studying in management faculty. 2016, JCMC. All Rights Reserved 49

Table 3: Respondents Sources of Information and Experience on Harmful Effects on Cell Phone Use Table 4: Respondents Knowledge on Harmful Effects on Cell Phone Use in Eyes, Ears and skin (n=70) Information (n=70) Yes No Sources of information(n=27) TV Internet Magazine Radio Family members Peers Experience on harmful effects of cell phone use (n=70) 27 43 15 18 9 10 9 38.6 61.4 53.6 64.3 42.9 32.1 35.7 32.1 Yes No 29 41 41.4 58.6 Table 3 reveals that among 70 respondents, 43 (61.4%) have not got information about the harmful effects on cell phone use and 27 (38.6%) of respondents have got information. Similarly among 27 respondents 18(64.3%) of respondents had got the information from internet, and 9 (32.1%) respondents had got information from radio and peers. Likewise among 70 respondents 41 (58.6%) of respondents had not experienced of harmful effects of cell phone use and 29 (41.4%) of respondents had experienced. Effects in Eyes** Eye cancer* Eye injury Dry eye* Eye strain* Glaucoma Effects in Ear** Itching around ear Gradual loss of hearing* Inner ear damage* Warmness around ear* Discharge from ear* Swelling of ear Effects in Skin** Skin allergy* Eczema* Extraction of protein molecules from skin* Pimples Excessive growth of facial hair 11 15.7 Multiple response** Correct response* 48 41 33 49 19 22 54 46 25 35 19 49 40 26 68.6 58.6 47.1 70.0 27.1 31.4 77.1 65.7 35.7.0 27.1 71.4 69.8 57.1 37.1 Table4 indicates that regarding harmful effects of cell phone on eyes, out of 70 respondent s majority of the respondents 49 (70.0%) answered eye strain and 19 (27.1%) respondents answered glaucoma. Regarding harmful effects on ear, 54 (77.1%) of respondents answered gradual loss of hearing and 22 ( 31.4%) respondents answered itching around ear.regarding the harmful effects on skin, (71.4%) respondents answered skin allergy and 11 (15.7%) answered excessive growth of facial hair. 2016, JCMC. All Rights Reserved

Table 5: Respondents Knowledge on Harmful Effe c ts on C e ll P hone Use on C he st Re g ion( n = 70) Effects in Chest region ** Freq. % Chest pain 25 35.7 Risk for breast cancer * Increases the blood pressure* Decreases the heart rate* Chest injury Multiple response** 53 45 48 75.7 64.3 68.6 20 28.6 Correct response* Table 5. reveals that, out of 70 respondents, 53 (75.7%) of respondents answered risk for breast cancer is the harmful effects of cell phone if kept on chest region, and 20 (28.6%) answered chest injury. Table 6: Respondents Knowledge on Harmful Effect on Cell Phone after Lights Out (n =70) Table 7: Respondents Knowledge Regarding the Harmful Psychological Effects (n= 70) Effects in psychological function Headache poor memory* Head injury Irritation Effects on psychological health** Addiction on cell phone use* Sleep disturbance* Tension* Memory capacity increases 36 6 63 38 31 27 20.0 51.4 20.0 8.6 90.0 54.3 44.9 39.15 Effect after lights out Freq. % Tiredness* 19 27.1 Fever Headache Common cold Correct response* 32 5 20 45.7 7.1 Table 6.reveals that out of 70 respondents, 32 (45.7%) of respondents answered headache if cell phone used after bed time, 5 (7.1%) respondents answered common cold. Feeling of loneliness Lower self- esteem* Multiple response** 29 34 Correct response* 42.0 48.6 Table 7reveals that cent percent of the respondents answered that cell phone use can cause harmful effects on our psychological health (not shown in table.) Regarding the knowledge on harmful effects of cell phone use on psychological function, 36 (51.4%) of respondents answered poor memory and 6 (8.6%) respondents answered head injury. Regarding the harmful effects on psychological health, majority of the respondent 63 (90%) answered addiction on cell phone use and 27 (39.15%) respondents answered feeling of loneliness TABLE 8:Respondents Level of Knowledge regarding Harmful Effects on Cell Phone Use (n =70) Poor knowledge = < 60%. 36 51.4 Average Knowledge = 60-79% Good knowledge = 80-100% 32 2 45.7 2.9 2016, JCMC. All Rights Reserved 51

Table 8reveals that out of the 70 respondents, half of the respondents 36(51.4%) have poor knowledge regarding harmful effects on cell phone use, 32 (45.7%) of respondents have average knowledge and only 2 (2.9%) respondents have good knowledge. Table 9: Association between Respondents Level of Knowledge and Selected Variables Age Variables Level of Knowledge χ 2 p value Poor Good 15-17 years 18-19 years Sex 17(43.6%) 19(61.3%) 22(56.4%) (38.7) 2.166 0.1 Male Female Faculty 23 (51.1%) 13 (52.0%) 22(48.9%) (48.0%) 0.05 0.943 Science 17 (48.6%) 18 (51.4%) 0.229 0.632 Management Grade 19 (54.3%) 16 (45.7%) 11 (46.7%) 16 (53.3%) 0.477 0.490 Previous experience 22 (55.0%) 18 (45.0%) Yes 17(58.6%) (41.4%) 1.025 0.311 No Significant level at 0.05 19(46.3%) 22(53.7%) Table 9 shows that the level of knowledge regarding harmful effects on cell phone use is statistically notsignificant with age (p=0.1), sex (p=0.943), faculty (p=0.632), grade (p=0.490) and previous experience (p=0.311). DISCUSSION OF THE STUDY Regarding the demographic characteristics, the study revealed that out of 70 students, 34.3% of the students belongs to the age of 17 years and majority 64.3% of the students were male. This findings were supported by study done by Pendse and Zagade where sample size were 0, which revealed that 38% of the students belongs to the age of 17 years and majority 59% of the students were male. 9 Regarding the faculty, there were equal distribution of respondents % each in both science and management faculty and regarding the duration of cell phone use, 40.0% of respondents were using their cell phone since 2 years. This finding were supported by the study done by Pendse and Zagade which revealed that there were equal distribution of respondents % each in both science and management faculty and majority of the respondents 34% were using their cell phone since 2 years. 9 Regarding the information of harmful effects on cell phone use, 38.6% of respondents had not got information 52 2016, JCMC. All Rights Reserved

regarding harmful effects of cell phone use. This study was not supported by study conducted by G.S,S.which revealed that 63% had got information regarding the harmful effects on cell phone use. 10 CONCLUSION The conclusions made are based on the findings of the study. Students of Saptagandaki Multiple College showed that more then half (51.4%)of the students had a poor level of knowledge on harmful effects of cell phone use, 45.7% had average level of knowledge and only 2.9% of the students had good level of knowledge. Respondents have good level of knowledge regarding harmful effects of cell phone as it causes addiction on cell phone 90.0% but have average level of knowledge as it causes headache 78.6%, gradual loss of hearing 77.1%, eye strain 70.0%, dizziness 71.4%, skin allergy 71.45%, risk for breast cancer 75.7% and have poor level of knowledge as it causes dry eye 47.1%, warmness around ear 35.7%, tiredness if used after lights out. Regarding the harmful effects on psychological health, majority of the respondent 63 (90%) answered addiction on cell phone use and 27 (39.15%) respondents answered feeling of loneliness. Statistically there was no significant association between level of knowledge of the respondents regarding harmful effects on cell phone use and selected variables. By considering all this major findings it s clear that the some educational intervention has to lunch by institution in order to enhance the awareness among higher secondary school students. So the authorities of educational Institute should allocate some amount of time to enlighten the harmful effects on cell phone use among them. REFERENCES 1. Ghai OP. Essential Pediatrics. 2007. 6th ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers. 2. Ganesamurthy VS. Cell phone misuse. The Hindu 5(2). April 24, 2007. Retrieved from http://www. thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tptamilnadu/cell-phone-misuse/article1832720. ece. 3. Winder D. Global Icons Cell phones and Globalization. 2008. Retrieved from URL: http// www. the globalist.com. 4. Panda NK, Jain R, Bakshi J, Munjal S. Audiologic disturbances in long-term mobile phone users. Journal of Otolaryngology- head and neck surgery 2010; 39(1):5-11. Retrieved from http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/202338 5. Hakoama M, Hakoyama S. The impact of cell phone use on social networking and development among college students. The American association of behavioral and social sciences journal, 2011. Retrieved from https://43f7cb640225fbfc67686e0928 f1de5be0b26d7e. googledrive.com/host/0 bwyza6ed9smqn0k5qv9ymkhgz00/journal/ journal2011/05hakoamafinal.pdf 6. Mousavy SJ. Effects of mobile phone radiofrequency on the structure and function of the normal human haemoglobin. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2009;44(3):278-85. Retrieved from :http:// www.i-md.com/docsearch/doc/2abe60- e7bd-48ab-ad08-d3637c95bba5. 7. Schreier N, Huss A, Roosli M. The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electro Magnetic exposure in Switzerland. SOZ Praventivmed 2004;,51(4):202-209. Retrieved from http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17193782. 8. Burrell L. Cell phone radiation breast cancer link - New study raises grave concerns. Natural News. Nov. 27, 2013. Retrieved fromhttp:// www.naturalnews.com/043070_cell_phone_ radiation_breast_cancer_electromagnetic_ fields.htmlixzz3lmey0b6g 9. Pendse N, Zagade T. Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Health Hazards of Mobile Phone Users among the Junior College Students. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 20;3(5). Retrieved from file:///c:/users/ Fujitsu/Downloads/mobile%20use%20(1).pdf. 10. G SS. The knowledge and attitude on ill effects of mobile phone use and its prevention among adolescents. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research 20; 5(9): 1678-1681. Retrieved fromhttp://www.recentscientific. com/sites/default/files/download_0.pdf 2016, JCMC. All Rights Reserved 53