Why Airplanes Can t Fly

Similar documents
Physics of an Flow Over a Wing

LAMDES User s Manual VLMpc

3D Ideal Flow For Non-Lifting Bodies

NUMERICAL 3D TRANSONIC FLOW SIMULATION OVER A WING

Aerodynamics of 3D Lifting Surfaces through Vortex Lattice Methods. Introduction to Applications of VLM

Lift Superposition and Aerodynamic Twist Optimization for Achieving Desired Lift Distributions

Aerodynamic Design of a Tailless Aeroplan J. Friedl

An efficient method for predicting zero-lift or boundary-layer drag including aeroelastic effects for the design environment

Post Stall Behavior of a Lifting Line Algorithm

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE STICK MODEL-INDUCED ELASTIC STREAMWISE CAMBER DEFORMATION TO THE FLUTTER SPEED OF A SWEPT WING

DETERMINATION OF FLIGHT STABILITY COEFFICIENTS USING A FINITE ELEMENT CFD

GRID PATTERN EFFECTS ON AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF GRID FINS

The Spalart Allmaras turbulence model

Optimate CFD Evaluation Optimate Glider Optimization Case

Subsonic Airfoils. W.H. Mason Configuration Aerodynamics Class

Validation of a numerical simulation tool for aircraft formation flight.

Shock Wave Reduction via Wing-Strut Geometry Design

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering WIND TURBINE DESIGN USING A FREE-WAKE

Theory, Computation and Experiment on Criticality and Stability of Vortices Separating from Edges

AERODYNAMIC DESIGN OF FLYING WING WITH EMPHASIS ON HIGH WING LOADING

Subsonic Airfoils. W.H. Mason Configuration Aerodynamics Class

Aerodynamics of 3D Lifting Surfaces through Vortex Lattice Methods (3) Two implementations of the VLM

Optimisation Studies Validation Document

THE EFFECTS OF THE PLANFORM SHAPE ON DRAG POLAR CURVES OF WINGS: FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSES RESULTS

How to Enter and Analyze a Wing

COMPARISON OF SHOCK WAVE INTERACTION FOR THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL SUPERSONIC BIPLANE WITH DIFFERENT PLANAR SHAPES

Aircraft Stability and Performance 2nd Year, Aerospace Engineering. Dr. M. Turner

CFD Methods for Aerodynamic Design

High-order solutions of transitional flow over the SD7003 airfoil using compact finite-differencing and filtering

MCG 4345 Aerodynamics Computational Assignment I. Report Presented to Dr. Stavros Tavoularis. Prepared By

Determination of Angle of Attack (AOA) for Rotating Blades

SUPERSONIC INVERSE DESIGN METHOD FOR WING-FUSELAGE DESIGN

(c)2002 American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics or Published with Permission of Author(s) and/or Author(s)' Sponsoring Organization.

MSC/NASTRAN FLUTTER ANALYSES OF T-TAILS INCLUDING HORIZONTAL STABILIZER STATIC LIFT EFFECTS AND T-TAIL TRANSONIC DIP

Modelling the Unsteady Loads of Plunging Airfoils in Attached, Light and Deep Stall Conditions

Application of STAR-CCM+ to Helicopter Rotors in Hover

Parallelized Coupled Solver (PCS) Model Refinements & Extensions

A simple method for potential flow simulation of cascades

Detached-Eddy Simulation of a Linear Compressor Cascade with Tip Gap and Moving Wall *)

Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of an Idealized Modern Wingsuit

MSC Software Aeroelastic Tools. Mike Coleman and Fausto Gill di Vincenzo

Debojyoti Ghosh. Adviser: Dr. James Baeder Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Department of Aerospace Engineering

Optimisation of the Sekwa Blended-Wing-Body Research UAV

GAs for aerodynamic shape design II: multiobjective optimization and multi-criteria design

Introduction to ANSYS CFX

INFLUENCES INVESTIGATION OF NUMERICAL PARAMETERS AND MESHING ON THE AEROELASTIC RESPONSE

Aeroelastic Optimization of a High Aspect Ratio Wing

CFD Analysis of 2-D Unsteady Flow Past a Square Cylinder at an Angle of Incidence

ACTIVE SEPARATION CONTROL WITH LONGITUDINAL VORTICES GENERATED BY THREE TYPES OF JET ORIFICE SHAPE

Computational Investigation of Inviscid Flow over a Wing With Multiple Winglets

THROUGHOUT the history of aviation, very little of man s

Design and Development of Unmanned Tilt T-Tri Rotor Aerial Vehicle

Introduction to CFX. Workshop 2. Transonic Flow Over a NACA 0012 Airfoil. WS2-1. ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.

University of Texas VSP Structural Analysis Module Update - Demonstration

DYNAMICS OF A VORTEX RING AROUND A MAIN ROTOR HELICOPTER

CFD Analysis of conceptual Aircraft body

Unsteady Hybrid Navier-Stokes/Vortex Model Applied to Wind Turbine Aerodynamics under Yaw Conditions

APAME Aircraft Panel Method Tutorial

Incompressible Potential Flow. Panel Methods (3)

A WIND TUNNEL BASED STUDY OF THE FLOW FIELD BEHIND SAILPLANE WINGLETS

Verification of Laminar and Validation of Turbulent Pipe Flows

VLM 4997 User s Guide - (from reference 4)

Verification and Validation of Turbulent Flow around a Clark-Y Airfoil

SMALL HEIGHT DUCT DESIGN FOR MULTICOPTER FAN

Introduction. AirWizEd User Interface

Aerodynamic Optimization of Integrated Wing-Engine Geometry Using an Unstructured Vorticity Solver. Logan King

Keywords: CFD, aerofoil, URANS modeling, flapping, reciprocating movement

5. GENERALIZED INVERSE SOLUTIONS

LES Analysis on Shock-Vortex Ring Interaction

Integrated Computational and Experimental Studies of Flapping-wing Micro Air Vehicle Aerodynamics

Estimating Vertical Drag on Helicopter Fuselage during Hovering

VorDyn1.0 user manual

Chapter 4: Immersed Body Flow [pp (8e), or (9e)]

Wind tunnel experiments on a rotor model in yaw

SPC 307 Aerodynamics. Lecture 1. February 10, 2018

1. Meshes. D7013E Lecture 14

Modeling three-dimensional dynamic stall

EFFECT OF YAW-TILTED HINGE AXIS ON DEPLOYMENT ROBUSTNESS OF MARS AIRPLANE

VorDyn2.0 user manual

What s New in AAA? Design Analysis Research. Version 3.3. February 2011

VORTEX LATTICE MODULE

Development of a CFD Capability for Full Helicopter Engineering Analysis

Verification and Validation of Turbulent Flow around a Clark-Y Airfoil

Yaw-Roll Coupled Oscillations of a Slender Delta Wing

THE EFFECT OF REPLACING THE JOUKOWSKI MAP WITH THE GENERALIZED KARMAN-TREFFTZ MAP IN THE METHOD OF ZEDAN

ENGI Parametric & Polar Curves Page 2-01

The Numerical Simulation of Civil Transportation High-lift Configuration

THE choice of the mathematical representations of the geometry

Lecture 1.1 Introduction to Fluid Dynamics

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia IUTAM 14 (2015 ) IUTAM ABCM Symposium on Laminar Turbulent Transition

Panel method for ducted propellers with sharp and round trailing edge duct with fully aligned wake on blade and duct

Summary and additional notes for Static ti pressure measurements:

Strömningslära Fluid Dynamics. Computer laboratories using COMSOL v4.4

LES Applications in Aerodynamics

AeroPack User s Manual

Mesh Generation. Quadtrees. Geometric Algorithms. Lecture 9: Quadtrees

Design and Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of an Idealized Modern Wingsuit

OpenVSP: Parametric Geometry for Conceptual Aircraft Design. Rob McDonald, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Cal Poly

Small Height Duct Design for 17 Multicopter Fan Considering Its Interference on Quad-copter

If you want the impulsive start only, make tstop > ntsteps; if you want both the impulsive start and the impulsive stop, make tstop < ntsteps.

Transcription:

body Z z body Y y body X x b dz dy dx k j i F U S V ds V s n d.. Why Airplanes an t Fly

Physics of an Flow Over a Wing Werle, 974, NAA 00,.5 o, AR=4, Re=0000 Wake descends roughly on an extension of the chord line Bippes, lark Y, Rectangular Wing 9 o, AR=.4, Re=00000 Head, 98, Rectangular Wing, 4 o, Re=00000

Physics of Flow Over a Wing l, Lift varies across span -s s y irculation is shed (Helmholz thm) p u <p l pu p l Vortical wake Vortical wake induces downwash on wing Downwash changing angle of attack just enough to produce variation of lift across span Including a model of the vortical wake is thus critical to model a wing in ideal flow

Induced Drag l, The continuous generation of the vortical wake requires energy input (even in ideal flow) -s s y This energy is supplied by the wing doing work against an inviscid drag force. p u <p l pu p l This induced drag (induced by the wake on the wing) is still consistent with ideal flow because, with the vortical wake, the wing is no longer an isolated body in an otherwise undisturbed ideal flow. Downwash So, ideal flow pressures acting on a 3D wing shouldn t balance in the streamwise direction, when that wing is generating lift

Kutta ondition for 3D Wedge trailing edge flow stops in cross-sectional view, but can still move along trailing edge LE p =0 TE 0 usp trailing edge Velocity magnitude (and pressure) same on both sides, but direction can be different u u In both cases this is equivalent to requiring that the surface vorticity parallel to the t.e. p be zero. In practice, enforcing this will require (by Helmholtz theorem) that streamwise vorticity to be shed from the trailing edge. This is how we get our vortical wake.

Wing Nomenclature Areas and Lengths z x Taper assumed linear from zero to root, unless otherwise specified. y Average chord c A S / b Aspect ratio AR b / ca b / S V iu jv kw

Wing Nomenclature z Angles x Positive twist increases, and is termed wash-in. Negative twist is termed wash-out. Assumed to linearly increase from zero at root, unless otherwise specified. Twist y Sweep Angle of attack arctan( w / u ) Also sideslip angle arctan( v / u) (zero as pictured)

pitch Wing Nomenclature Forces and oments roll F x F z yaw D L oment conventions Us Ind. std pitch yaw roll N L Y P R N L F y y z V V u v w Angle of Attack L V S D D V S V S c L

pitch Wing Nomenclature Forces and oments roll F x F z yaw D L oment conventions Us Ind. std pitch yaw roll N L Y P R L N F y y z V V u v w Angle of Attack L V S D D V S V S c L

omputing Forces and oments L V S V S c L p nds=da -y z Planform area Total Force as coefficients Total moment about origin of r as coefficients F F S F U F i F x roll s U s y S i F Sc j F k pitch k. n ds k. da z x i j F R y yaw i j k P k z j Y x pnds k S p pr nds Sc pda da p r da r pr da easured from ¼ chord at root, so moments about this point L and D obtained by rotating z and x by the angle of attack

Ideal Flow ethods for Wings Panel ethods Lifting ethods Vortex Lattice ethod Lifting line theory See Katz and Plotkin for complete descriptions and prescriptions

Doublet Panel ethod for Wings. Treat wing like non-lifting body over wing with N panels. Determine panel strengths by requiring no flow through surface at N control points Solution will result in non zero filament strength along the trailing edge (Kutta condition not satisfied) V

Doublet Panel ethod for Wings. Add panels in wake to cancel t.e. vorticity The new wake panels have no control point requirements we simply require that they cancel the t.e. vorticity so that W = L - U. This gives new equation for every wake panel we have, so we still have a solvable set. The sides of these panels then represent the shed vortex sheet. Ideally wake panels extend to. In practice a big distance (50c?) is enough. Extend wake panels downstream in the plane of the root chord (but with any side slip of the free stream) Wake panel strength W Upper panel strength U Lower panel strength L V

3D Wing ode Same as 3D Panel ode for non-lifting bodies except: Specify different geometry Extend influence coefficient matrix to include strength relation for each wake panel W = L - U, rather than a control point relation Add code to compute forces and moments Wing code at http://www.aoe.vt.edu/aoe504

%3D doublet panel method for lifting wings. clear all; vinf=[cos(8*pi/80);0;sin(8*pi/80)]; %free stream velocity %Specify wing geometry (NAA 00 section) xp=[ 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0. 0.5 0. 0.075 0.05 Specify 0.05 free 0.05 0 zp=[0 0.0448 0.063 0.03664 0.04563 0.0594 0.05803 0.0600 0.0594 0.05737 0.05345 0.0468 nb=5;b=.5;sweep=30;dihedral=5;twist=0;taper=.5; stream and [r,rc,nw,sw,se,ne,no,we,so,ea,wp,bp]=wing(xp,zp,b,nb,vinf,sweep,dihedral,twist,taper); geometry xl=-;xh=;yl=-.5;yh=.5;zl=-;zh=;cl=-;ch=; % plotting limits % determine surface area and outward pointing normal vectors at control points (assumes counte ac=0.5*v_cross(r(:,sw)-r(:,ne),r(:,se)-r(:,nw));nc=ac./v_mag(ac); %determine influence coefficient matrix npanels=length(rc(,:));coef=zeros(npanels); for nn=:length(bp) ompute n=bp(nn); influence cmn=ffil(rc(:,n),r(:,nw),r(:,sw))+ffil(rc(:,n),r(:,sw),r(:,se))+ffil(rc(:,n),r(:,se),r(:,n coef(n,:)=nc(,n)*cmn(,:)+nc(,n)*cmn(,:)+nc(3,n)*cmn(3,:); coefficients end for nn=:length(wp) n=wp(nn); coef(n,ea(n))=;coef(n,we(n))=-;coef(n,n)=; end %determine result matrix rm=(-nc(,:)*vinf()-nc(,:)*vinf()-nc(3,:)*vinf(3))'; ompute result rm(wp)=0;coef(end+,bp)=;rm(end+)=0; %prevents singular matrix - sum of panel strengths on c ga=coef\rm; %Determine velocity and pressure at control points ga=repmat(ga',[3 ]); for n=:npanels %Determine velocity at each c.p. without principal ompute value surface cmn=ffil(rc(:,n),r(:,nw),r(:,sw))+ffil(rc(:,n),r(:,sw),r(:,se))+ffil(rc(:,n),r(:,se),r(:,n v(:,n)=vinf+sum(ga.*cmn,); velocity at c.p.s, end %Determine principle value of velocity at each c.p., add -grad(ga)/ principal gg=v_cross((rc(:,we)-rc(:,no)).*(ga(:,we)+ga(:,no))+(rc(:,so)-rc(:,we)).*(ga(:,so)+ga(:,we))+( te=find([:npanels]'==ea(:));gg(:,te)=gg(:,te)/;te=find([:npanels]'==we(:));gg(:,te)=gg(:,te v=v-gg/; %velocity vector cp=-sum(v.^)/(vinf'*vinf); %pressure matrix and solve value

Different Geometry %Specify wing geometry (NAA 00 section) xp=[ 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0. 0.5... zp=[0 0.0448 0.063 0.03664 0.04563 0.0594... nb=5;b=.5;sweep=30;dihedral=5;twist=0;taper=.5; [r,rc,nw,sw,se,ne,no,we,so,ea,wp,bp]=wing(xp,zp,b,nb,vinf,sweep,dihedral,twist,taper) xl=-;xh=;yl=-.5;yh=.5;zl=-;zh=;cl=-;ch=; % plotting limits Airfoil coordinates, starting at the trailing and progressing along the upper surface, the leading is at xp=0, trailing edge at xp=. Repeat t.e. point at end. nb is number of points to put across the span b is span (compared to root chord) sweep, dihedral, twist (at tip) are in deg. taper is taper ratio wing() generates shape needs vinf, to position wake panels, gives panel and control point position vectors (r and rc) and indices (nw, sw ) also gives indices of panels in the wake (wp) and on the body of the wing (bp) x no ea we so -y z

under the hood Function [r,rc,nw,sw,se,ne,no,we,so,ea,wp,bp]=wing(xp,zp,b,nb,vinf,sweep,dihedral,twist,taper) sweep=sweep*pi/80;dihedral=dihedral*pi/80;twist=twist*pi/80; %Define vertices of panels yp=([0:nb+]-)/(nb-)*b-b/; %evenly spaced points spanwise, extra points akes used flat to untwisted close tips x=repmat(xp,[nb+ ])-0.5; %grid of x points, shift quarter chord rectangular to origin wing of y=repmat(yp',[ length(xp)]); correct span, origin z=repmat(zp,[nb+ ]); z(,:)=0;z(end,:)=0;y(,:)=y(,:);y(end,:)=y(end-,:); %close tips at ¼ chord z=z.*(+*(taper-)/b*abs(y)); %apply linear taper x=x.*(+*(taper-)/b*abs(y)); lt=(twist**abs(y)/b); %apply linear twist z=z.*cos(lt)-x.*sin(lt); x=x.*cos(lt)+z.*sin(lt); x=x;z=z; z=z+abs(y).*tan(dihedral); %apply dihedral x=x+abs(y).*tan(sweep); %apply sweep x=x+.5; %return leading edge to origin Applies taper, twist, dihedral and sweep and returns origin to l.e. %Add wake panels for trailing edge Kutta condition. Wake panels end up as last array column xwakelength=50; % number of chordlengths to extend wake panels downstrem of t.e. mvinf=sqrt(vinf()^+vinf()^); x(:,end+)=x(:,end)+vinf()/mvinf*wakelength; %Extend wake in the plane of the root chord y(:,end+)=y(:,end)+vinf()/mvinf*wakelength; %(but with any side slip of the free stream) z(:,end+)=z(:,end); all that indexing stuff down here Adds wake panels

Same Indexing we nw no sw ne n c se ea For wake panels the east and west indices are used to identify the two trailing edge panels Wake panel strength W W = L - U we ( U ) r c r so ea ( L ) %determine influence coefficient matrix npanels=length(rc(,:));coef=zeros(npanels); for nn=:length(bp) n=bp(nn); cmn=ffil(rc(:,n),r(:,nw),r(:,sw))+ffil(rc(:,n)... coef(n,:)=nc(,n)*cmn(,:)+nc(,n)*cmn(,:)... end for nn=:length(wp) n=wp(nn); coef(n,ea(n))=;coef(n,we(n))=-;coef(n,n)=; end x no ea we so -y z

%ompute forces and moments cp=repmat(cp,[3 ]);area=sum(abs(ac(3,bp)))/;cbar=area/b;alpha=atan(vinf(3)/vinf()); rc=rc;rc(,:)=rc(,:)-0.5; omputing %ompute moments about and quarter chord oments f=sum(-cp(:,bp).*ac(:,bp),)/area; %Forces are the -Integral(pressure d(area vector)) m=sum(-cp(:,bp).*v_cross(rc(:,bp),ac(:,bp)),)/area/cbar; %oments are the - Integral(pressure position x d(area vector)) l=f(3)*cos(alpha)-f()*sin(alpha);d=f(3)*sin(alpha)+f()*cos(alpha); Planform area S k. n ds k. da p r nds=da -y z Total Force as coefficients Total moment about origin of r as coefficients F F F i F x roll F U s y S i F U s Sc j F k pitch z x i j F R y yaw i pnds j k k P z j Y x k S pda p pr nds Sc da p r da pr da easured from ¼ chord at root, so moments about this point L and D obtained by rotating z and x by the angle of attack

Presenting Forces and oments Lift coefficient as a function of angle of attack for a symmetric section, plane wing with a quarter chord sweep of 45 degrees and a taper of 0.5. argason et al. (985). Note that the lift curve slope is less that, and decreases with reducing aspect ratio and taper. This is mostly because the tips generate less lift than an equivalent D section

Presenting Forces and oments

Presenting Forces and oments D L AR urve for minimum drag (elliptical wing) D L (tan 0lift ) urve assuming wing only generates force normal to chord

Hints on using the code Ignore the divide by zero and rank deficient warnings. These are a consequence of there being a couple of panels (at the t.e. tips) with zero size, and don t seem to cause any problems. Try to pick numbers of spanwise and chordwise points so aspect ratio of panels doesn t get extreme - grid independence is most easily checked by increasing or decreasing the number of spanwise points. Don t overkill the number of points (e.g. 00 airfoil points or span points) unless you want to wait to 0 for results. Remember the solution time goes up as the square of the total number of panels. ake sure your airfoil profile specifies leading and trailing edge points. Have fun trying out weird configurations, with this and the non-lifting code, and resulting streamline/pressure patterns..