UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Tactical Data Links

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Navy Tactical Computer Resources

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Lightweight Torpedo Development

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface ASW

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Polar MILSATCOM (Space) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Network Centric Collaborative Targeting FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 110

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #192

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #193

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RDT&E, N / BA-05. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8W: IT Software Development Initiatives. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Data to Decisions Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Applied Research. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Facility Restoration and Modernization - T&E

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

UNCLASSIFIED. All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #49 Page 1 of 10

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE K: Long-Haul Communications - DCS

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date February 2007 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E Defense-Wide, BA 7

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #18

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Software Engineering Institute (SEI) FY 2012 OCO

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Cost to Complete

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #65

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #218

Naval Surface Warfare Center,

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2008 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E, Dw BA 06

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Command Control and Communications. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. February 2006

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

DOE and Test Automation for System of Systems T&E

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic Information Warfare Research Project (IWRP)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #176

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic

3.5 System Design Documentation and Technical Data Support

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 IT President's Budget Request Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Overview

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Col Phil Carpenter. SML, Simulators Program Office

The DoD T&E/S&T Program

SPAWAR FLEET READINESS DIRECTORATE STRATEGIC PLAN STATEMENT A: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited (JANUARY 2017)

Integrating Usability Engineering in the Iterative Design Process of the Land Attack Combat System (LACS) Human Computer Interface (HCI)

1. Significant Changes

Test Resource Management Center Directed Energy T&E Conference A Joint DEPS ITEA Event

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Towards Effective Cybersecurity for Modular, Open Architecture Satellite Systems

Argon ST. Creative People Applying Advanced Technology

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic

(U) COMPUTER NETWORK OPERATIONS (U) GENIE. (U) Project Description

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 IT President's Budget Request Defense Technical Information Center Overview

Corporate Capabilities

Integrating Usability Engineering in the Iterative Design Process of the Land Attack Combat System (LACS) Human Computer Interface (HCI)

Avionics Cyber T&E Examples Testing Cyber Security Resilience to support Operations in the 3rd Offset Environment

Net-Centric Enterprise

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003

Test & Evaluation/Science & Technology (T&E/S&T) Cyberspace Test Technology (CTT) Project Overview. 2nd Annual ITEA Cyber Security Workshop

UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-5

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 IT President's Budget Request Defense Media Activity Overview

Interoperable Software Radio Project. The desires and concerns of software defined radio implementations

Navy Cyber Resilience

NDIA San Diego Chapter 2017 Fall Industry Forum PMW 760 Overview


Transcription:

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 1.511 1.447 1.756-1.756 1.792 1.827 1.860 1.891 Continuing Continuing 3091: Advanced Cryptological Sys Eng (CCOP) 1.511 1.447 1.756-1.756 1.792 1.827 1.860 1.891 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Advanced Cryptologic Systems Engineering - Cryptologic Carry On Program develops state-of-the-art signal acquisition software in response to Combatant Command requirements for a quick-reaction surface, subsurface, and airborne cryptologic carry-on capability. There are approximately 115 cryptologic capable surface ships in the current Navy inventory, and each is a potential user of this carry-on equipment, depending on deployment schedules and the tempo of operations. In addition, numerous subsurface and air platforms are potential users. This funding line will provide the resources to enable rapid transition of available Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) and Government Off-The-Shelf (GOTS) technologies that apply to Fleet requirements for carry-on system functionalities. These technologies typically require various levels of integration to leverage on-board systems that provide system and mission management, product reporting, and data analysis. Before deployment for operational use, systems must be tested to ensure suitable and reliable operation, tested for network vulnerabilities if connected to shipboard Local Area Networks, and tested relative to interoperability requirements. Certification testing is conducted to meet Office of Naval Intelligence security requirements and network testing is conducted in accordance with Information Technology (IT)-21 requirements to allow connection to Navy networks. Funding will also provide resources to address rapid deployment of enhancements or improvements to the common hardware and/or software baseline of all other carry-on subsystems to meet emergent requirements. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Previous President's Budget 1.519 1.447 1.757-1.757 Current President's Budget 1.511 1.447 1.756-1.756 Adjustments -0.008 - -0.001 - -0.001 Congressional General Reductions - - Congressional Directed Reductions - - Congressional Rescissions - - Congressional Adds - - Congressional Directed Transfers - - Reprogrammings - - SBIR/STTR Transfer - - Rate/Misc Adjustments - - -0.001 - -0.001 Congressional General Reductions Adjustments -0.008 - - - - Navy Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #184

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 Change Summary Explanation Technical: Not applicable. Schedule: Not applicable. Navy Page 2 of 9 R-1 Line #184

Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) 3091: Advanced Cryptological Sys Eng (CCOP) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To 1.511 1.447 1.756-1.756 1.792 1.827 1.860 1.891 Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Advanced Cryptologic Systems Engineering - Cryptologic Carry On Program program develops state-of-the-art signal acquisition software in response to Combatant Command requirements for a quick-reaction surface, subsurface and airborne cryptologic carry-on capability. There are approximately 115 cryptologic capable surface ships in the current Navy inventory, each is a potential user of this carry-on equipment, depending on deployment schedules and the tempo of operations. In addition, there are numerous subsurface and air platforms that are also potential users. This funding line will provide the resources to enable rapid transition of available Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) and Government Off -The-Shelf (GOTS) technologies that apply to Fleet requirements for carry-on system functionalities. These technologies typically require various levels of integration to leverage on-board systems that provide system and mission management, product reporting, and data analysis. COTS/GOTS system documentation and training materials usually require adaptation or modification to meet fleet operator requirements, or entirely new training materials may need to be developed. Before deployment for operational use, systems must be systematically tested to ensure suitable and reliable operation, tested for network vulnerabilities if connected to shipboard Local Area Networks, and tested relative to interoperability requirements. Certification testing is conducted to meet Office of Naval Intelligence security requirements and network testing is conducted in accordance with Information Technology (IT)-21 requirements to allow connection to Navy networks. Funding will also provide resources to address rapid deployment of enhancements or improvements to the common hardware and/or software baseline of all other carry-on subsystems to meet emergent requirements. FY13 funds will continue to integrate, test, and document identified COTS and GOTS technologies and subsystems that meet emergent and on-going Fleet requirements as specified in the Signals of Interest (SOI) and target threat list. Funds will continue to develop upgrades to existing systems and subsystems according to Fleet requirements. Additional funds will aid in the development of new SOI algorithms in support of cryptologic systems. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions, Article Quantities in Each) FY 2011 FY 2012 Title: Advanced Cryptological Sys Eng (CCOP) FY 2011 Accomplishments: Continued to integrate, test, and document identified COTS and GOTS technologies and subsystems that met emergent and on-going Fleet requirements as specified in the FY11 SOI and target threat list. Developed upgrades to existing systems and subsystems according to Fleet requirements. FY 2012 Plans: Articles: 1.511 0 1.447 0 1.756 0 Navy Page 3 of 9 R-1 Line #184

Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions, Article Quantities in Each) FY 2011 FY 2012 Continue to integrate, test, and document identified COTS and GOTS technologies and subsystems that meet emergent and on-going Fleet requirements as specified in the Signals of Interest (SOI) and target threat list. Funds will continue to develop upgrades to existing systems and subsystems according to Fleet requirements. Plans: Continue to integrate, test, and document identified COTS and GOTS technologies and subsystems that meet emergent and on-going Fleet requirements as specified in the Signals of Interest (SOI) and target threat list. Funds will continue to develop upgrades to existing systems and subsystems according to Fleet requirements. Additional funds will aid in the development of new SOI algorithms in support of cryptologic systems. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals 1.511 1.447 1.756 C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To OPN / 3501: Cryptologic Communications Equipment 12.764 10.173 10.112 0.000 10.112 10.240 10.389 10.588 10.780 Continuing Continuing D. Acquisition Strategy Acquisition, management, and contracting strategies are to support engineering and manufacturing development by providing funds to Space and Naval Warfare (SPAWAR) Systems Centers Atlantic and Pacific, and miscellaneous contractors with management oversight by SPAWAR. E. Performance Metrics Cryptologic Carry On Program (CCOP) will deliver state-of-the-art signal acquisition software for CCOP systems in response to Combatant Command requirements for a quick-reaction surface, subsurface and airborne cryptologic carry-on capability. There are approximately 241 CCOP systems in inventory. Navy Page 4 of 9 R-1 Line #184

Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 Product Development ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location Prior FY 2012 Navy Page 5 of 9 R-1 Line #184 To Systems Engineering Various Various:Various 1.915 - - - - Continuing Continuing Continuing Systems Engineering Support ($ in Millions) Category Item C/CPFF Method & Type Classified :Classified Performing Activity & Location 0.197 0.230 Dec 2011 0.260 Dec 2012-0.260 Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal 2.112 0.230 0.260-0.260 Prior FY 2012 To Software Development Various Various:Various 6.109 - - - - Continuing Continuing Continuing Software Development Software Development Software Development C/CPFF Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) Category Item Developmental Test & Evaluation Developmental Test & Evaluation Developmental Test & Evaluation Method & Type Classified :Classified SSC PAC:San Diego, CA SSC LANT:Charleston, SC Performing Activity & Location 0.552 0.517 Feb 2012 0.674 Dec 2012-0.674 Continuing Continuing Continuing 0.310 0.340 Jan 2012 0.407 Nov 2012-0.407 Continuing Continuing Continuing 0.165 0.180 Jan 2012 0.223 Nov 2012-0.223 Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal 7.136 1.037 1.304-1.304 Prior FY 2012 To Various Various:Various 0.333 - - - - Continuing Continuing Continuing NPGS:Monterey, CA 0.054 0.050 Feb 2012 0.055 Nov 2012-0.055 Continuing Continuing Continuing OPTEVFOR:Norfolk, VA 0.012 0.030 Feb 2012 0.037 Dec 2012-0.037 Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal 0.399 0.080 0.092-0.092

Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 Management Services ($ in Millions) Category Item Program Management Support Program Management Support Travel Method & Type Performing Activity & Location Prior FY 2012 To Various Various:Various 0.958 - - - - Continuing Continuing Continuing SSC PAC:San Diego, CA SPAWAR:San Diego, CA 0.180 0.100 Feb 2012 0.100 Nov 2012-0.100 Continuing Continuing Continuing 0.315 - - Oct 2012 - - Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal 1.453 0.100 0.100-0.100 Prior FY 2012 Project s 11.100 1.447 1.756-1.756 To Remarks Navy Page 6 of 9 R-1 Line #184

Exhibit R-4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 Navy Page 7 of 9 R-1 Line #184

Exhibit R-4A, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 Schedule Details Start End Events by Sub Project Quarter Year Quarter Year Proj 3091 Prototype Phase - 2011 1 2011 4 2011 Prototype Phase - 2012 1 2012 4 2012 Prototype Phase - 2013 1 2013 4 2013 Prototype Phase - 2014 1 2014 4 2014 Prototype Phase - 2015 1 2015 4 2015 Prototype Phase - 2016 1 2016 4 2016 Prototype Phase - 2017 1 2017 4 2017 System Design Review (SDR) - 2011 2 2011 2 2011 System Design Review (SDR) - 2012 2 2012 2 2012 System Design Review (SDR) - 2013 2 2013 2 2013 System Design Review (SDR) - 2014 2 2014 2 2014 System Design Review (SDR) - 2015 2 2015 2 2015 System Design Review (SDR) - 2016 2 2016 2 2016 System Design Review (SDR) - 2017 2 2017 2 2017 Software Delivery - 2011 3 2011 4 2011 Software Delivery - 2012 3 2012 4 2012 Software Delivery - 2013 3 2013 4 2013 Software Delivery - 2014 3 2014 4 2014 Software Delivery - 2015 3 2015 4 2015 Software Delivery - 2016 3 2016 4 2016 Software Delivery - 2017 3 2017 4 2017 Navy Page 8 of 9 R-1 Line #184

Exhibit R-4A, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 Start End Events by Sub Project Quarter Year Quarter Year Operational Assessment (OA) - 2011 3 2011 3 2011 Operational Assessment (OA) - 2012 3 2012 3 2012 Operational Assessment (OA) - 2013 3 2013 3 2013 Operational Assessment (OA) - 2014 3 2014 3 2014 Operational Assessment (OA) - 2015 3 2015 3 2015 Operational Assessment (OA) - 2016 3 2016 3 2016 Operational Assessment (OA) - 2017 3 2017 3 2017 Navy Page 9 of 9 R-1 Line #184