SAToolkit for Nastran (SATK)

Similar documents
FEMAP Structural Analysis Toolkit for NASTRAN. Carl Poplawsky Maya Simulation Technologies

Simulation of laminate composite space antenna structures

Femap Thermal & Flow V11

Industrial finite element analysis: Evolution and current challenges. Keynote presentation at NAFEMS World Congress Crete, Greece June 16-19, 2009

NX Response Simulation: Structural dynamic response

NX Advanced FEM. Benefits

Software. IMAT v7.1 Bringing the Power of MATLAB to Your Engineering Analysis and Test Data. Overview. IMAT Extended Capabilities.

NX Advanced FEM. fact sheet

NX Advanced Simulation

Femap Version

LS-DYNA s Linear Solver Development Phase 2: Linear Solution Sequence

NX Advanced Simulation: FE modeling and simulation

Femap automatic meshing simplifies virtual testing of even the toughest assignments

midas NFX 2017R1 Release Note

Simcenter 3D Structures

Modeling Bolted Connections. Marilyn Tomlin CAE COE / Siemens Corporation

New Capabilities in Project Hydra for Autodesk Simulation Mechanical

CAD - How Computer Can Aid Design?

CHAPTER 8 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Finite Element Analysis Using NEi Nastran

NX and LMS Test.Lab Integration at AAM. NX CAE Symposium Title

Fundamentals of Modeling with Simcenter 3D Robin Boeykens

Engineering Analysis

SIMULATION CAPABILITIES IN CREO

SDA Webinar Introduction to NX Nastran SOL 200 Design Optimization

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF Ka-BAND GIMBALED ANTENNAS FOR A COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE SYSTEM

Nastran In-CAD: Understanding Data Conversion, Data Type, and Contour Type

Using MSC.Nastran for Explicit FEM Simulations

SIMULATION CAPABILITIES IN CREO. Enhance Your Product Design with Simulation & Analysis

What s new in NX 9 for simulation

Simcenter 3D Engineering Desktop

MSC.Nastran Structural Optimization Applications for Aerospace Structures

Simcenter 3D Engineering Desktop

PLM Software. Femap Express for Solid Edge. Answers for industry. Velocity Series

Appendix P. Multi-Physics Simulation Technology in NX. Christian Ruel (Maya Htt, Canada)

NX for Simulation: Product capabilities in NX 8

Loads Recognition Tools Checks Reports

Full Vehicle Dynamic Analysis using Automated Component Modal Synthesis. Peter Schartz, Parallel Project Manager ClusterWorld Conference June 2003

What s new in Femap 9.3

About the Author. Acknowledgements

Normal Modes - Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

Stress analysis of Camshaft by using ANSYS Software

SimWise. 3D Dynamic Motion, and Stress Analysis. integrated with Alibre Design

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Stiffened Plate

LS-DYNA s Linear Solver Development Phase1: Element Validation Part II

Elasto-Plastic Deformation of a Thin Plate

NEi FEA. IRONCAD Advanced FEA. IRONCAD Advanced FEA. NEi FEA

PTC Creo Simulate. Features and Specifications. Data Sheet

NON-PARAMETRIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION IN INDUSTRIAL CONTEXT

NX for Simulation: Product capabilities in NX 10

Simcenter 3D What s New in Mark Donley: Simcenter Structures Product Manager

Running a Thermal Analysis

FEMAP All Rights Reserved NASTRAN 1

Normal Modes - Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

Design Verification Procedure (DVP) Load Case Analysis of Car Bonnet

Normal Modes Analysis of a Simply-Supported Stiffened Plate

Femap and NX Nastran Best Practices

Normal Modes - Rigid Element Analysis with RBE2 and CONM2

PTC Newsletter January 14th, 2002

Post-Processing Static Results of a Space Satellite

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Truss

For Structural analysis, Thermal analysis, Mechanisms simulation and other Fields

SDC Verifier is a powerful postprocessor program with an advanced calculation core which works seamlessly with Siemens multi-solver, FEA software

MRI Induced Heating of a Pacemaker. Peter Krenz, Application Engineer

Deployment and Latching Simulation of Large Reflectors

NX I-deas MasterFEM Complete standalone capabilities for creating FE models and evaluating simulation results

Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Validation of Lower Control Arm

Leveraging Integrated Concurrent Engineering for vehicle dynamics simulation. Manuel CHENE MSC.Software France

Static and Normal Mode Analysis of a Space Satellite

Elasto-Plastic Deformation of a Truss Structure

Topological optimization of the sti ener and layup of a rear wing sport car

Coupled Analysis of FSI

Modal and Stress Analysis of X71A Sport Motorcycle Framebody Virtual Testing Model based on Finite Element Analysis

Structural re-design of engine components

LMS Virtual.Lab Correlation

CHAPTER 4. Numerical Models. descriptions of the boundary conditions, element types, validation, and the force

FEMAP/NX NASTRAN PERFORMANCE TUNING

SimWise 4D. Integrated Motion and Stress Analysis

DMU Engineering Analysis Review

Workshop MSC Nastran Topology Optimization Manufacturing Constraints

Coustyx Tutorial Indirect Model

The Mechanics of Composites Collection Material Minds Software A Product of Materials Sciences Corporation

SIMCENTER 12 ACOUSTICS Beta

Modal Analysis of a Beam (SI Units)

Similar Pulley Wheel Description J.E. Akin, Rice University

Analysis of low cycle fatigue considering geometric manufacturing tolerances

Getting Started. These tasks should take about 20 minutes to complete. Getting Started

Modal Analysis of Exhaust System to Optimize Mounting Hanger Location

DMU Engineering Analysis Review

Random Vibration Analysis of a Circuit Board. Sean Harvey August 2000 CSI Tip of the Week

Principal Roll Structure Design Using Non-Linear Implicit Optimisation in Radioss

Predicting and simulating noise Integrated vibro- and aero- acoustic approach

Multi-Objective Optimization of a Ball Grid Array Using modefrontier & COMSOL Multiphysics

STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF PIN CONNECTIONS USING COMPUTER AIDED SYSTEMS

Process Automation for Static Analysis of Truck Chassis Assembly

Helical Spring. Supplementary Exercise - 6. Objective: Develop model of a helical spring

ANSYS Element. elearning. Peter Barrett October CAE Associates Inc. and ANSYS Inc. All rights reserved.

RHEOMOLD ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS LLP

FEMAP FEMAP Modeler. Meshing: Subdivision and semi-automatic meshing of solids Automatic and mapped meshing (with quads or bricks), including biasing

siemens.com/plm/nxcae NX CAE Advanced simulation solutions to drive smarter product decisions Answers for industry.

Transcription:

SAToolkit for Nastran (SATK) by Carl J. Poplawsky presented to Femap Symposium Ann Arbor, MI. date June 4th, 2015

MAYA Company Overview OEM Foundation Siemens PLM Partner 30+ years Software Developer Femap (Thermal, Flow, SAToolkit) NX, I-deas, BuildIT, DC Clarity Software Reseller NX, Femap, LMS Services Provider Structural, Thermal/Flow, Femap/NX API, SW development, Training, Support 120+ Qualified Domain Experts Advanced Degrees in Heat Transfer, CFD and Structural Analysis Presence Across North America Headquartered in Montreal Offices in Dallas, Chicago, Phoenix 2

SAToolkit for NASTRAN (SATK) Efficient and accurate random and sine solutions from NASTRAN normal modes results (SOL103) Sate of the art integration schemes Very fast generation of vibration responses Parallelized Efficient post-processing of Nastran results Ranking, sorting, enveloping, filtering Summaries by groups, subcases, etc. Margins of safety for different failure types Direct manipulation of.op2 file data Extremely efficient for large models Support NX & MSC Nastran MODE SUMMARY Windows & Linux Effective Mass Filter 1.10% Response Filter 30.00 GS Automatic Report Generation HTML, MS Excel, ASCII Mode Freq (Hz) Mx(%) My(%) Mz(%) Response Load Case Node Group Name 1 10.185 60.40% 0.00% 0.00% 38.27 1 6 ALL NODES 2 20.372 0.00% 0.00% 60.45% 38.26 3 6 ALL NODES 3 61.032 18.95% 0.00% 0.00% 19.31 1 6 ALL NODES 4 121.308 0.00% 0.00% 19.03% 19.31 3 6 ALL NODES 5 164.067 6.45% 0.00% 0.00% 8.97 1 6 ALL NODES 6 304.130 3.08% 0.00% 0.00% 6.33 1 2 ALL NODES 7 322.451 0.00% 0.00% 6.46% 8.97 3 6 ALL NODES 8 442.152 1.12% 0.00% 0.00% 3.43 1 3 ALL NODES 9 586.438 0.00% 0.00% 3.02% 7.37 2 6 ALL NODES 10 640.168 0.00% 79.73% 0.00% 31.58 2 6 ALL NODES 11 835.330 0.00% 0.00% 1.03% 3.30 3 3 ALL NODES 12 1857.840 0.00% 7.70% 0.00% 9.79 2 6 ALL NODES 13 2893.656 0.00% 2.00% 0.00% 5.83 2 2 ALL NODES 14 3646.219 0.00% 0.52% 0.00% 3.67 2 6 ALL NODES 15 4041.859 0.00% 0.05% 0.00% 1.27 2 6 ALL NODES

SAToolkit Suite Random Vibration Processor Sine Vibration Processor Modal Processor Energy Processor Mass Processor Stress Processor Grid Point Force Processor Element Force Processor

Random Processor State-of-the-art integration schemes Integration done on a subset of results No need to specify integration frequencies, SATK does it automatically! Don t have to worry about defining too few or too many Exact Von Mises stress calculation using ultra-efficient second-generation Segalman approach For random vibration loading, the probability distribution of von Mises stress is a nonlinear function of the linear stress components Deterministic approach (Gaussian) is incorrect SATK Random Processor computes the peak Von Mises stresses using improved Segalman approach Parallelized Solver Orders of magnitude faster than using Nastran for base node random vibration Stress margins of safety automatically calculated on groups of elements using specified factor of safety

Random Processor Performance metrics Small model: 8 seconds Exact 3-sigma peak Von Mises stress for all elements 64k nodes, 71k elements 50 modes, 1 axis Medium model: 1 min 55 seconds Exact 3-sigma peak Von Mises stress for all elements 420k nodes, 413k elements 25 modes, 3 axes Large model, 120 minutes Exact 3-sigma peak Von Mises stress for all elements 980k nodes, 600k elements 250 modes, 3 axes Op2 file size: 77 GB

Random Processor - Benefits For large tet meshes like the large example (below) Solution without SAToolkit is not feasible Disk space and/or CPU time prohibitive SATK allows the user to streamline the modeling process Spend less effort meshing Leverage free meshing with minimal de-featuring Avoid mid-surface extractions and mixed element types Reduced effort defining local element sizing No need to break up the modal solution into specific frequency ranges and then combine RMS results 75% reduction in modeling effort is not unusual

Random Processor - Output MS Excel Perfect for notching or other processing HTML Perfect for quick view and reports Binary Perfect for quick view in Femap

Sine Processor Uses efficient modal approach with option to use modal truncation Identifies a subset of eigenvectors Phase-consistent Von Mises Stresses Stress tensor is complex Von Mises stress is a real value Maximum possible Von Mises stress is computed for any phasing of the stress tensor components Stress margins of safety automatically calculated on groups of elements using specified factor of safety Accurate results Nastran eigenvectors are used Computes Nastran results, except faster

Modal Processor Provides all information required in preparation of modal forced response analysis For each mode Effective mass Maximum response estimation for excitation in all 3 translational directions for user-selected node groups Summary of all the modes that pass the following criteria: User-defined minimum effective mass User-defined minimum dynamic response

Modal Processor

SAToolkit Random Processor Demonstration Automotive Muffler

SAToolkit Suite Random Vibration Processor Sine Vibration Processor Modal Processor Energy Processor Mass Processor Stress Processor Grid Point Force Processor Element Force Processor

Energy Processor (modal analysis) Efficiently identify groups with high energy in complex models, on a mode by mode basis Compute both kinetic and strain energy

Mass Processor (all solutions) FEM s mass properties tabulated by physical property and optionally by user-defined element groups Mass properties separated into structural and non structural masses Accounts for lumped masses, 1-d, 2-d, 3-d, and laminate elements

Stress Processor (static analysis) Summarizes margins of safety for many element groups, across multiple subcases and for different safety factors Supported failure theories: Von Mises, Laminates, Honeycomb Sandwich For each group one can specify: Factor of safety, Allowable Stress, MS threshold, Failure criteria Dynamic stresses are combined in a phase consistent fashion Resulting margins of safety can processed as contour plots

Stress Processor Summary Worksheet Summarize margins of safety for many element groups, across Nastran subcases and for different safety factors

Stress Processor Detailed MS Excel Worksheets As many worksheets as there are combinations of subcases and user-defined stress cases

Grid Point Force / Joints Processor Synthesizes forces on groups of elements in complex geometries, for several subcases Extract resulting forces at a grid point resulting from a user specified group of elements MPC, SPC forces and applied loads can be considered Resulting forces may be in a coordinate system other then the grid displacement coordinate system Typically used for bolt and joints detailed hand calculations Also used for laminate/composite joint analyses

Grid Point Force / Joints Processor

Element Force Processor Efficiently summarizes forces on elements for many element groups and several subcases, component by component Force output varies depending on element type Summaries make it easy to identify critical component and element

Element Force processor MS Excel output of spring forces Rs 3 Ra 2 1 Example of bolt margin calculation in MS Excel using spring force data

Q & A Find out more www.mayasim.com info@mayasim.com