A Study on the Behaviour of SAODV with TCP and SCTP Protocols in Mobile Adhoc Networks

Similar documents
AVC College of Engineering, Mayiladuthurai, India

II. ROUTING CATEGORIES

A STUDY ON AODV AND DSR MANET ROUTING PROTOCOLS

Simulation and Analysis of AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols in Vehicular Adhoc Networks using Random Waypoint Mobility Model

QoS Routing By Ad-Hoc on Demand Vector Routing Protocol for MANET

Performance Evaluation of AODV DSDV and OLSR Routing Protocols with Varying FTP Connections in MANET

Routing Protocols in MANET: Comparative Study

DYNAMIC SEARCH TECHNIQUE USED FOR IMPROVING PASSIVE SOURCE ROUTING PROTOCOL IN MANET

Performance Improvement of Wireless Network Using Modern Simulation Tools

Implementation and simulation of OLSR protocol with QoS in Ad Hoc Networks

Effect of SCTP Multistreaming over Satellite Links

Delayed ACK Approach for TCP Performance Improvement for Ad Hoc Networks Using Chain Topology

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF AODV ROUTING PROTOCOL IN MANETS

Performance Analysis of AODV Routing Protocol with and without Malicious Attack in Mobile Adhoc Networks

An Efficient Broadcast Algorithm To Transmit Data In Multi-hop Relay MANETs Fathima Sana 1, Dr. M. Sudheep Elayidom 2

Behaviour of Routing Protocols of Mobile Adhoc Netwok with Increasing Number of Groups using Group Mobility Model

The General Analysis of Proactive Protocols DSDV, FSR and WRP

Anil Saini Ph.D. Research Scholar Department of Comp. Sci. & Applns, India. Keywords AODV, CBR, DSDV, DSR, MANETs, PDF, Pause Time, Speed, Throughput.

Performance Evaluation of MANET through NS2 Simulation

Figure 1. Clustering in MANET.

ETSF10 Internet Protocols Transport Layer Protocols

Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

A Comparative Analysis of Traffic Flows for AODV and DSDV Protocols in Manet

Simulation & Performance Analysis of Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocol

Dynamic Search Technique Used for Improving Passive Source Routing Protocol in Manet

Performance Analysis of Wireless Mobile ad Hoc Network with Varying Transmission Power

Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols (AODV, DSDV and DSR) with Black Hole Attack

A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols. Broch et al Presented by Brian Card

PIONEER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GROUP

Performance Comparison of DSDV, AODV, DSR, Routing protocols for MANETs

Routing Protocols in MANETs

TCP RENO, SACK AND VEGAS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

An Implementation of Cross Layer Approach to Improve TCP Performance in MANET

Performance Analysis and Enhancement of Routing Protocol in Manet

Regression-based Link Failure Prediction with Fuzzy-based Hybrid Blackhole/Grayhole Attack Detection Technique

Performance Evaluation of Various Routing Protocols in MANET

GOPALAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT Department of Computer Science and Engineering COURSE PLAN

Performance Analysis of OLSR and QoS Constraint OLSR in MANET

SUMMERY, CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK

Mobility and Density Aware AODV Protocol Extension for Mobile Adhoc Networks-MADA-AODV

Review: Performance Evaluation of TCP Congestion Control Mechanisms Using Random-Way-Point Mobility Model

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Improved OLSR Protocol for VANET

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March ISSN

A Comparative Analysis of Energy Preservation Performance Metric for ERAODV, RAODV, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols in MANET

Evaluation of Ad-hoc Routing Protocols with. Different Mobility Models for Warfield. Scenarios

Considerable Detection of Black Hole Attack and Analyzing its Performance on AODV Routing Protocol in MANET (Mobile Ad Hoc Network)

A Simulation study : Performance comparison of AODV and DSR

2013, IJARCSSE All Rights Reserved Page 85

GSM Based Comparative Investigation of Hybrid Routing Protocols in MANETS

A Review paper on Routing Protocol Comparison

Analysis of Black-Hole Attack in MANET using AODV Routing Protocol

Analysis of Network Traffic in Ad-Hoc Networks based on DSDV Protocol

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TCP VARIANTS FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS

Implementation and Performance Evaluation of Three Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Network Using Network Simulator

RADNET Protocol enhancement by implementing RED routing algorithm using NS2 for Wireless Adhoc Networks

QoS Based Evaluation of Multipath Routing Protocols in Manets

An Extensive Simulation Analysis of AODV Protocol with IEEE MAC for Chain Topology in MANET

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Cross-layer TCP Performance Analysis in IEEE Vehicular Environments

Performance evaluation of AODV, DSR and DSDV in mobile ad-hoc network using NS-2

PERFORMANCE BASED EVALUATION OF DSDV, AODV AND DSR ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MANET

Performance Analysis of AOMDV, OLSR and DSR Routing Protocols Using UDP agents in MANETS

Performance Analysis of Wireless Mesh Network for AODV, DSDV, DSR and AOMDV

Performance Evaluation of DSDV, DSR AND ZRP Protocol in MANET

Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET)

Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive and Proactive Mobile Ad Hoc Routing Protocols

Performance Analysis of DSDV and ZRP Protocols with Mobility Variations in MANETs

Performance analysis of QoS-Oriented Distributed Routing protocols for wireless networks using NS-2.35

Performance Comparison of AODV, DSDV and DSR Protocols in Mobile Networks using NS-2

Energy Efficient EE-DSR Protocol for MANET

Analysis of Routing Protocols in MANETs

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TCP, UDP, AND SCTP IN MANETS

Rate Based Pacing with Various TCP Variants

Quantitative Performance Evaluation of DSDV and OLSR Routing Protocols in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks

A Neighbor Coverage Based Probabilistic Rebroadcast Reducing Routing Overhead in MANETs

Simulation and Performance Analysis of OLSR Routing Protocol Using OPNET

Performance Of OLSR Routing Protocol Under Different Route Refresh Intervals In Ad Hoc Networks

PERFORMANCE BASED EVALUATION OF DSDV, AODV AND DSR ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MANET

Blackhole Attack Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Support Vector Machine

Content. 1. Introduction. 2. The Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Algorithm. 3. Simulation and Results. 4. Future Work. 5.

CHAPTER 4 SIMULATION MODEL AND PERFORMANCE METRICS

Secure Enhanced Authenticated Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Qos Parameters Estimation in MANET Using Position Based Opportunistic Routing Protocol

A Survey - Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in MANET

Keywords: AODV, MANET, WRP

A Comparison of Routing Protocols for MANET using NS-2 Simulator

3. Evaluation of Selected Tree and Mesh based Routing Protocols

Simulation Based Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols Using Random Waypoint Mobility Model in Mobile Ad Hoc Network

Performance of DSDV Protocol over Sensor Networks

Chapter 7 CONCLUSION

Vaibhav Jain 2, Pawan kumar 3 2,3 Assistant Professor, ECE Deptt. Vaish College of Engineering, Rohtak, India. Rohtak, India

Performance Comparison of Mobility Generator C4R and MOVE using Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR)

EFFICIENT ROUTING AND CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT IN MULTICHANNEL MOBILE ADHOC NETWORKS

Performance of Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols in Different Network Sizes

ROUTE STABILITY MODEL FOR DSR IN WIRELESS ADHOC NETWORKS

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MANET USING NS-2

Real-time and Reliable Video Transport Protocol (RRVTP) for Visual Wireless Sensor Networks (VSNs)

A COMPARISON OF REACTIVE ROUTING PROTOCOLS DSR, AODV AND TORA IN MANET

Optimizing Performance of Routing against Black Hole Attack in MANET using AODV Protocol Prerana A. Chaudhari 1 Vanaraj B.

Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Network

Transcription:

International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.8, August 218 A Study on the Behaviour of SAODV with TCP and SCTP Protocols in Mobile Adhoc Networks S. Mahalakshmi 1, Dr. K. Geetha 2 Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science, Periyar Arts College, Cuddalore 1 Associate professor, Department of Computer Science, Periyar Arts College, Cuddalore 2 Email: mahasubramani17@gmail.com 1 Abstract- SAODV (Secure Ad-Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector) Protocol is an efficient routing protocol. It maintains the security with the help of cryptography and key management algorithm. In this paper, the behavior of SAODV protocol is analyzed with TCP and SCTP protocols in MANET. The performance is analyzed with the Quality of Service Parameters such as Throughput, Packet Delivery Ratio, End-to-End Delay, Network Overhead, Control Overhead and Jitter. NS-2 is used for the simulation. Keywords - SAODV, MANET, TCP, SCTP, NS-2. 1. INTRODUCTION MANET means Mobile Ad-Hoc Network. The node acts as a mobile device and each node is connected through the wireless link. This can be Wi-Fi Connections or another medium such as cellular or satellite transmission. It is a complex system. Every node acts as a router to share the message or traffic to another node. The nodes are randomly moved and different topologies are used in MANET. Once the connection is established data is transferred through the connection oriented protocol (TCP) or connectionless protocol (UDP). Each node is connected in different wireless links. It form self configuring network. It maintains many nodes with security to each sender and receiver node. SCTP protocol is a message stream oriented protocol. It provides Multistream and Multihoming facility. SAODV provides security in MANET. Fig 1.1 MANET 1.1 Features of MANET: MANET has following features [1]: Autonomous Terminal Distributed Operations Provides fast transmission Multi-Hop Routing Dynamic Network Topology Self - Directed Terminal Self Creation and Self Organization and Self Administration This paper is organized as follows: section 2 describes Review of Literature, section 3 describes Description of the problem, the analysis of performance is provided in section 4 and section 5 describes conclusion of the paper. 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE Dr. K. Geetha and N. Sreenath [2] transfer multimedia data through the mobile adhoc network. The multimedia data is sent through the mobile adhoc network and performance are measured through the quality of service parameter like throughput, end-to-end delay, jitter, routing control overhead and normalized network overload. Performance are compared in different routing protocols are AODV, DSDV, OLSR and FSR. Ashwini kumar,lillykutty Jacob and A.L. Ananda [3] Mobile Ad-Hoc Network is a complex system. TCP and SCTP both are wired protocol but in wireless its performance is different. The SCTP has Multihoming facility. TCP and SCTP performances are evaluated through Good put comparison, retransmission comparison and sack bandwidth comparison. Finally TCP is not well perform in MANET. SCTP multihoming is slightly slow but Multistream mechanism is best in SCTP, So SCTP is best in MANET. Antonios argyriou and Vijay madisetti [4] SCTP performance are evaluated through the DSR and AODV routing protocol. Furthermore a cross layer optimization to the SCTP and DSR protocols. SCTP is used to detect route failures. SCTP and TCP performance are evaluated through the DSR and 2216

International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.8, August 218 AODV. SCTP and TCP performances are compared and evaluated through the DSR routing protocol. Again SCTP and TCP performances are evaluated through the AODV routing protocol. TCP and SCTP is produce same results but SCTP provides better results than TCP. Finally SCTP handling route failures in MANET. Durgesh wadbude, Vineet richariya [5] secure AODV routing protocol in MANET. SAODV is a advanced version of AODV. SAODV is an efficient routing protocol. design new algorithm to improve the secure AODV in MANET. Finally the Secure AODV performance is analyzed through the quality of metrics such as end-to-end delay, packet loss and throughput. 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM The SAODV is a special protocol; an extended version of AODV, which is a well known routing protocol. In MANET information is sent from sender to receiver and information is received without correct destination multiple nodes are connected through the wireless link. So MANET provides security routing protocol. Security is important concept of MANET. The SAODV is an extension of AODV. It is a MANET routing protocol. It is used for security purpose. All the nodes are connected through the SAODV. The SAODV provides digital signature [6] for nodes for asymmetric cryptosystem. SAODV is an efficient routing protocol. It maintains the security with the help of cryptography and key management algorithm. It provides integrity, Authentication and non- repudiation. In MANET the key management is divided into two categories: Symmetric and Asymmetric key management. The symmetric key uses the same key for encryption and decryption. Asymmetric key it uses encryption and decryption algorithm. It uses digital signature or public key algorithm for encryption. The performance of SAODV is analyzed with TCP and SCTP protocols. 3.1 TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) is one of the most important protocols in transport layer. It is a byte oriented protocol. TCP is the fast transmit protocol. it provides 95% data transfer with Security [7]. The TCP protocol provides full duplex methods (Both side data transmission) and point to point line configuration. It is a connection oriented protocol. TCP provides Segmentation and Re-assembly method. If the sender sends the large data TCP divide the large packet into small packets and assign the ID to each small packet and the receiver receives each small packet with ID. Finally all the small packets are combined with one large packet. This method is used to detect packet loss. TCP is combined with IP (Internet Protocol). IP is used to send the packet from source to destination machine. TCP provides 3- way handshaking mechanism. Such as Connection establishment Data transfer Connection termination 3.1.1 Services of TCP TCP includes several features [7]. Such as Connection Oriented Service Full Duplex Service Retransmission Service Segmentation and Reassembly 3.1.2 TCP in MANET TCP is a connection oriented Transport Layer Protocol. It well performed in wired network. But in wireless network TCP performance is slightly slow. It provides low bandwidth and high packet loss. TCP includes Congestion Control Methods to detect packet loss and improve the throughput. But in wireless TCP needs an efficient algorithm to avoid the packet loss. 3.2 SCTP (Stream Control Transmission Protocol) SCTP means Stream Control Transmission Protocol [8]. SCTP is the transport layer protocol. It is a reliable message oriented transport layer protocol. SCTP contains advanced features of TCP. It is a combination of the TCP and UDP. It is specially designed for internet application. SCTP maintains message boundaries, detects the lost packet or data, duplicate data and out-of-ordered data. It provides connection oriented services. 3.2.1 Services of SCTP The SCTP contain many services. Are: Process to process communications Multistream facility Full duplex connection Reliability Multihoming facility 4. ANALYSIS OF SAODV WITH TCP AND SCTP The simulation environment consists of 5 wireless mobile nodes and the nodes are moving 9 * 9 meters area for 5 seconds of simulated time. Describe two-way ground propagation mode, the IEEE 82.11 MAC and Omni-directional antenna model of NS-2. Clustering is used to form the header and find the source and destination with nearest signal. The simulation table explains the simulation environment. 2217

International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.8, August 218 The throughput is used to measure the number of packets delivered to destination within seconds. The throughput can be defined as: Throughput = Kbps 2. Packet delivery Ratio The packet delivery ratio is calculated as the ratio of the number of packets sent to the number of packets to the receiver. The packet delivery ratio can be defined as: Packet delivery ratio= Received packets / Generated packets * 1 Fig 4.1 Node initialization in MANET PARAMETER VALUE Simulator NS-2 (Version 2.34 ) Channel type Channel/Wireless channel Radio-propagation Propagation/Two ray model round wave Network interface Phy/WirelessPhy type MAC Type Mac /82.11 Interface queue Type Link Layer Type Antenna Queue/Drop Tail LL Maximum packet in 6 ifq Area ( M*M) 9 * 9 Number of mobile node Source Type Simulation Time Routing Protocols Parameter Node Gap Antenna/Omni Antenna 5 TCP,SCTP 35 sec SAODV 7 parameters 3.22nm Table 1 Simulation Environment 4.1 Simulation Methods The analysis carried out with NS2. The following QoS parameters are considered for analysis. 1. Throughput 2. End-to-End Delay 3. Packet Delivery Ratio 4. Network Overhead 5. Control Overhead 6. Jitter 3. End-to-End delay The End-to-End delay defines the difference between each packet to transmit from source to destination. Delay depends on network speed, routing protocol and packet size. The delay can be defined as: Delay=Packet Received Time Packet Send Time 4. Network Overhead The Hello packet, which is used to check whether the neighbor node is active. Both, network and data packets have to share the same network bandwidth most of the time, and hence network packets are considered to be an overhead in the network. This overhead is called network overhead. The network overhead can be defined as: Network overhead=bandwidth / Total no of packets 5. Control overhead Routing overhead is the number of routing packets required for network communication. Routing overhead is calculated using AWK script which processes the trace file and produces the result. The Control overhead can be defined as: Routing overhead= Sum of routing packets / Sum of data packets 6. Jitter Jitter is the delay between the adjacent packets. The Jitter can be defined as: Jitter (i) = Delay (i+1) Delay (i) 4.2 Analysis The analysis section describes the TCP and SCTP performance in MANET. Finally The SCTP is well performing in throughput, packet delivery ratio, End-to-End Delay and jitter. The TCP is well performing in Network Overhead and Control Overhead in mobile ad-hoc networks. 1. Throughput 2218

DELAY(TIME) DATA SEND AND RECIEVED ROTING PACKETS RATE (SAODV) THROGHPUT DATA IN mb International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.8, August 218 SCPT VS TC P THROUGHPUT 12 SCTP VS TCP 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 SCTP 9.4 9.4 19 19 19 19 28 29 29 3 TCP 8.3 8.3 17 8.3 17 17 8.3 17 1 8 6 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 TCP 78 88 72 89 94 96 96 94 92 94 94 SCTP 77 88 7 89 91 91 92 92 92 93 93 Fig 4.2 (a) SCTP vs TCP throughput Fig 4.2 (d) SCTP vs TCP Network overhead 6 5 4 3 2 1 PACKET RATIO SCTP/TCP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 TCP 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 SCTP 52 53 39 37 51 53 42 53 52 54 36 Fig 4.2 (b) SCTP vs TCP packet deliver ratio. 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 SCTP Vs TCP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 SCTP 25 21 18 16 1 13 12 1 5 5 TCP 14 14 14 15 15 14 13 12 1 78 STCP vs TCP Fig 4.2 (e) SCTP vs TCP Control overhead 2 15 1 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1111213141516 TCP 8 8 8 8 8 8 17 8 8 8 SCTP 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Fig 4.2 (c) SCTP vs TCP End-to-End delay 2219

International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.8, August 218 15 1 5-5 -1 Fig 4.2 (f) SCTP vs TCP Jitter 5. CONCLUSION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TCP SCTP The performance of SAODV protocol is analyzed with TCP and SCTP protocol. In general, the TCP protocol is behaving well in terms of overhead. But the with respect to speedy delivery and throughput the SCTP protocol is behaving well along with SAODV in MANET. This is because of the characteristics of TCP like [9] Frequent path break, high error rate, low bandwidth. The SCTP protocol is well performing in Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks because of the following reasons: Multistreaming facility and Multihoming facility. From the analysis it is observed that SAODV is behaving well with SCTP than TCP. The TCP protocol provides high packet loss in Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks. REFERENCES [1] Ishu Vaishnu and Shahjahan Ali (217), Study on MANET: Concepts, Features and Applications Elk Asia Pacific Journal of Computer Science and Information System, ISSN2349-9392 (Online);DOI;1.16962/Eapimrm/issn. 2349-9392/215; Vol. 3,issue 2 (217). [2] K. Geetha and N. Sreenath (November, 213), A General study on the transfer of multimedia messages over in mobile ad-hoc networks, International Journal of Computer Applications (975-8887), vol. 81, no 9, November 213. [3] Ashwini Kumar, Lillykutty Jacob and A.L. Anada, SCTP vs TCP: performance comparison in MANET s, IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 4), 742-133/4. [4] Antonios Argyriou and Vijay Madisetti, Performance Evaluation and optimization of SCTP in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks, IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 3), 742-133/3, 23. [5] Durgesh Wadbude and Vineet Richariya (212), An Efficient secure AODV routing protocol in MANET, International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, ISSN: 2277-3754, vol. 1, issue 4, pp.274-279, April 212. [6] Manel Guerrero Zapata, Secure Ad-Hoc On- Demand Distance Vector Routing, Mobile Computing and Communication Review, vol. 6, number 3, pp.16-17. [7] Behrouz A. Forouzan, Data Communication and Networking, 2 nd ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill,29. [8] R. Stewart, Q. Xie, et al. RFC 296: Stream Control Transmission Protocol. Standards track, Network Working Group, The Internet Society, 2. [9] C. Siva Ram Murthy and B.S. Manoj, Ad- Hoc Wireless Networks Architecture and Protocols, Pearson ed. India: Pearson Education, 24. 222