Open Ontology Repository Initiative

Similar documents
The OOR Initiative An Update

The Semantic Interoperability Community of Practice (SICoP) of the Federal CIO Council

Semantic MediaWiki A Tool for Collaborative Vocabulary Development Harold Solbrig Division of Biomedical Informatics Mayo Clinic

MDA & Semantic Web Services Integrating SWSF & OWL with ODM

Hackathon Project (HC-04): Ontology Summit 2013 Content Hack Leveraging Semantics on OntologPSMW. Ken Baclawski Marcela Vegetti (co-champions)

Taxonomy Tools: Collaboration, Creation & Integration. Dow Jones & Company

Opus: University of Bath Online Publication Store

NCI Thesaurus, managing towards an ontology

OOR-IPR session 3: Discussion and consensus on licensing arrangements for the OOR Initiative, and positions we might take on related IPR issues

FIBO Metadata in Ontology Mapping

Event Metamodel and Profile (EMP) Proposed RFP Updated Sept, 2007

Terminologies, Knowledge Organization Systems, Ontologies

Acquiring Experience with Ontology and Vocabularies

Collaborative & WebProtégé

METADATA REGISTRY, ISO/IEC 11179

Tania Tudorache Stanford University. - Ontolog forum invited talk04. October 2007

Reducing Consumer Uncertainty

Semantic Technologies and CDISC Standards. Frederik Malfait, Information Architect, IMOS Consulting Scott Bahlavooni, Independent

WebProtégé. Protégé going Web. Tania Tudorache, Jennifer Vendetti, Natasha Noy. Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics

Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis. Ken Baclawski Northeastern University

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Metamodel framework for interoperability (MFI) Part 1: Reference model

Position Paper W3C Workshop on RDF Next Steps: OMG Ontology PSIG

Community-based ontology development, alignment, and evaluation. Natasha Noy Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research Stanford University

Where is the Semantics on the Semantic Web?

Future Directions for SysML v2 INCOSE IW MBSE Workshop January 28, 2017

CEN/ISSS WS/eCAT. Terminology for ecatalogues and Product Description and Classification

V.2.4. Allotrope Use Case. Heiner Oberkampf, PhD June 29 th 2018, Brussels EC NMBP Workshop on a European Materials Ontology

The MUSING Approach for Combining XBRL and Semantic Web Data. ~ Position Paper ~

AT&T Government Solutions, Inc.

Description Cross-domain Task Force Research Design Statement

University of Bath. Publication date: Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record. Link to publication

A Semantic Web-Based Approach for Harvesting Multilingual Textual. definitions from Wikipedia to support ICD-11 revision

Using Ontologies for Data and Semantic Integration

Smart Open Services for European Patients. Work Package 3.5 Semantic Services Definition Appendix E - Ontology Specifications

Ontology Development and Engineering. Manolis Koubarakis Knowledge Technologies

Extension and integration of i* models with ontologies

Semantic Web Update W3C RDF, OWL Standards, Development and Applications. Dave Beckett

Development of an Ontology-Based Portal for Digital Archive Services

MDA & Semantic Web Services Extending ODM with Service Semantics

Interoperability ~ An Introduction

Ontology Servers and Metadata Vocabulary Repositories

warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications

SRM UNIVERSITY. : Batch1: TP1102 Batch2: TP406

WHO ICD11 Wiki LexWiki, Semantic MediaWiki and the International Classification of Diseases

Thanks to our Sponsors

Semantics in the Financial Industry: the Financial Industry Business Ontology

AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. Lewis Hart & Patrick Emery

ISO CTS2 and Value Set Binding. Harold Solbrig Mayo Clinic

Building the NNEW Weather Ontology

NIST & CATEGORY THEORY

Semantic Web Domain Knowledge Representation Using Software Engineering Modeling Technique

Current State of ontology in engineering systems

Ontology as Knowledge Base for Spatial Data Harmonization

Global Reference Architecture: Overview of National Standards. Michael Jacobson, SEARCH Diane Graski, NCSC Oct. 3, 2013 Arizona ewarrants

INFO216: Advanced Modelling

Languages and tools for building and using ontologies. Simon Jupp, James Malone

TOWARDS ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BASED ON RELATIONAL DATABASE

Metadata Management in the FAO Statistics Division (ESS) Overview of the FAOSTAT / CountrySTAT approach by Julia Stone

Semantic Web. Ontology Pattern. Gerd Gröner, Matthias Thimm. Institute for Web Science and Technologies (WeST) University of Koblenz-Landau

0.1 Knowledge Organization Systems for Semantic Web

REVISION OF ISO (COMMON LOGIC)

Investigating Collaboration Dynamics in Different Ontology Development Environments

4.2 Electronic Mail Policy

From Metadata to Ontology:

Toward a Standard Rule Language for Semantic Integration of the DoD Enterprise

ISMTE Best Practices Around Data for Journals, and How to Follow Them" Brooks Hanson Director, Publications, AGU

Semantics for and from Information Models Mapping EXPRESS and use of OWL with a UML profile for EXPRESS

Ontology Development. Qing He

Best Practice Guidelines for the Development and Evaluation of Digital Humanities Projects

OMG Specifications for Enterprise Interoperability

Rich Hilliard 20 February 2011

Report from the W3C Semantic Web Best Practices Working Group

Google indexed 3,3 billion of pages. Google s index contains 8,1 billion of websites

Mymory: Enhancing a Semantic Wiki with Context Annotations

The Financial Industry Business Ontology

Current Research and Standards for Security Automation An overview of US Government efforts to support and promote security automation

Enhancement of CAD model interoperability based on feature ontology

Thematix consultancy in semantic technology and business

Next Generation of Metadata Registries and Open Ontology Registries

Data driven transformation of the public sector Tallinn, Estonia Head of unit 22 September 2016 European Commission

The Model-Driven Semantic Web Emerging Standards & Technologies

SKOS. COMP62342 Sean Bechhofer

Ontology-based Architecture Documentation Approach

Jeffery S. Horsburgh. Utah Water Research Laboratory Utah State University

Building Consensus: An Overview of Metadata Standards Development

Knowledge Retrieval. Franz J. Kurfess. Computer Science Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA, U.S.A.

Semantic Queries and Mediation in a RESTful Architecture

Reducing Consumer Uncertainty Towards a Vocabulary for User-centric Geospatial Metadata

STS Infrastructural considerations. Christian Chiarcos

Data Governance Central to Data Management Success

Building domain ontologies from lecture notes

Ontologies SKOS. COMP62342 Sean Bechhofer

Wither OWL in a knowledgegraphed, Linked-Data World?

EFIR & A Reusable INSPIRE Reference Platform

OWL Rules, OK? Ian Horrocks Network Inference Carlsbad, CA, USA

Knowledge Representations. How else can we represent knowledge in addition to formal logic?

For each use case, the business need, usage scenario and derived requirements are stated. 1.1 USE CASE 1: EXPLORE AND SEARCH FOR SEMANTIC ASSESTS

SeMFIS: A Tool for Managing Semantic Conceptual Models

The OAIS Reference Model: current implementations

Editor s Draft. Outcome of Berlin Meeting ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC32 WG2 N1669 ISO/IEC CD :ED2

Transcription:

Open Ontology Repository Initiative Frank Olken Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory National Science Foundation folken@nsf.gov presented to CENDI/NKOS Workshop World Bank Sept. 11, 2008 Version 6.0

DISCLAIMER Remarks, opinions, etc. about the Open Ontology Repository (OOR) Initiative are solely my own and do not reflect the position(s) of either Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory or the National Science Foundation. Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 2

Joint Work This is joint work by many persons: Peter Yim, Leo Obrst, Mike Dean, Michelle Raymond, Mark Musen, Barry Smith, Fabian Neuhaus, Michael Gruninger, Pat Hayes, Steve Ray, Ravi Sharma, Natasha Noy, Deborah McGuiness, Pat Cassidy, Elisa Kendall, Evan Wallace, John Sowa, myself (Frank Olken), et al. Many of these slides have been adapted from the OOR Communique without attribution. Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 3

What is the OOR Initiative? Open = accessible, minimal intellectual property encumbrances on the ontologies, preferably open source code for the repository Ontology = formal conceptualization (degree of formalization may vary: frames, graphs (RDF), logic (OWL-DL, Common Logic,...) Repository = collection of ontologies, related materials, support for storage, retrieval, integration, etc. Initiative = group/effort to create OOR Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 4

Definition of Ontology Repository "An ontology repository is a facility where ontologies and related information artifacts can be stored, retrieved and managed." Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 5

Goals of OOR Initiative To promote global use and sharing of ontologies by: Establishing a hosted registry-repository; Enabling open, federated, collaborative ontology repositories, and Establishing best practices for expressing interoperable ontologies and taxonomies in repositories. Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 6

Why OOR? To provide access to good quality ontologies for use in a variety of software, and for education To provide a place for persons to contribute new ontologies To provide a means for ontology queries, ontology integration To facilitate development of new, composite ontologies Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 7

Use Cases Store a new ontology about time. Find me a good ontology about time. Find me a concept duration in ontology X What is relationship between event in ontology X and occurrence in ontology Y? Find all subclasses of event in ontology Z Find immediate superclasses of event in ontology W Find a mapping between SIC and NAIC classifications Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 8

Ontology Formality? Degree and nature of formalization of ontologies will vary: Frames, SKOS, RDF, Description Logics, First Order Logic, Higher Order Logics Formalizable: KR language has known syntax Formal: KR language with well specified syntax KR language with well specified semantics (e.g., a model theory) Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 9

Macro-level Operations Macro-level = level of entire ontologies Support storage, retrieval, query, annotation at the ontology level Relationships among ontologies: Extends, specializes, revises,... Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 10

Micro-level Operations Micro-level: Partitions of ontologies Individual concepts, axioms,... Micro-level Operations: Storage, querying, retrieval, updates, annotation Inference Mapping between concepts in different ontologies Composition, integration of ontologies, portions of ontologies Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 11

Ontology Admission Criteria Required attributes of an ontology for inclusion in OOR: in a publicly described language and format. read accessible. in a formal language with a well-defined syntax. has the required metadata. has a clearly specified and clearly delineated scope. versions of the ontology are clearly identified. appropriately named. Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 12

Quality Control Build a repository of good quality ontologies There will be an editorial function by which ontologies will be reviewed to assess their quality Ontologies will be annotated with quality assessments. Quality assessments are intend as a guide to users, ontology developers, integrators Details yet to be settled, cf. ISO 11179 Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 13

Metadata Uses determine whether an ontology is suitable for a user purpose; capture the design rationales that underlie the ontology; find information about author, author credentials, and source of ontology reference material retrieve ontologies for use in domain applications; retrieve ontologies to be integrated with other ontologies; retrieve ontologies that will be extended to create new ontologies; Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 14

Types of Metadata Knowledge Representation Language Modularity (module structure) Relationships among ontologies Provenance Version Existing applications of the ontology (e.g. interoperability, search, decision support) Domain-specificity Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 15

Provenance Metadata Many ontologies are based on definitions taken from government regulations, legislation, court decisions, standards,... Need fine grained provenance, citations for individual concepts, axioms which cite authoritative sources for each item in ontology This is especially important for ontologies used for administrative or regulatory applications in federal agencies (e.g., EPA, FDA, OSHA, IRS,...) Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 16

Repository Architecture Federated Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Scalable. Optimized for sharing, collaboration and reuse. Supporting ontologies in multiple formats and levels of formalism. Distributed repositories. Explicit machine usable/accessible formal semantics for the meta-model of the repository. Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 17

Repository Architecture (cont.) A mechanism to address intellectual property and related legal issues/problems. Support for adding, searching and mapping across ontologies and data related to the stored ontologies. Support additional services both directly within the province of the repository and as external services. Support all phases of the ontology life cycle. Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 18

Repository Services Ontology creation tools Ontology editors Ontology differencing tools Ontology modularization tools (clustering, etc.) Ontology export Ontology visualization (e.g., graph visualization) Version management Access control Ontology syntax checking Ontology consistency checking no cycles in taxonomies Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 19

Status of OOR Initiative Ontology Summit in April of 2008 Ongoing teleconference discussions of: Integration of component technologies, gathering use cases & requirements, OOR architecture, open source code development, knowledge representation language, specification of ontology mappings, outreach to early adopters,... Early discussions about: collaboration between contributing institutions, preparation of OOR research proposal(s) to funding agencies Producing a joint OOR-Ontolog panel series See: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl? OpenOntologyRepository Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 20

Read the OOR Wiki: How to participate? http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl? OpenOntologyRepository Look at Ontology Summit 2008 http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl? OntologySummit2008 Listen to previous teleconferences, read mailing list archive Contact peter.yim@cim3.com to join mailing list Join the teleconferences Read / Contribute to email discussion Help write the OOR proposal(s) Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 21

Supplementary Material Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 22

Repository Goals Supporting the Open Ontology Repository (OOR) Initiative that will promote the global use of ontologies, their instance bases, rules, and services, and mappings among these. Enabling and facilitating open, federated, collaborative ontology repositories. Establishing best practices for expressing interoperable ontology work in open registries/repositories. Enabling and facilitating the development of common services to support the repository and to extend the capabilities available to providers, users, and developers who use the repository. Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 23

Repository Management enforce access policies enforce submission policies enforce governance policies enforce change management policies control user and administrator access Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 24

Registry vs. Repository Registry: Contains a list of ontologies and some related metadata about the ontologies Repository: Contains actual ontologies, not just a list of ontologies Supports storage, retrieval, updates, integration of ontologies Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 25

Repository Functions create usage reports validate syntax check logical consistency automatically categorize a submission Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 26

Repository Search Criteria domain author/creator/source version language terminology and controlled vocabularies quality mapping inference Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 27

Related Work XMDR project metadata repositories (LBNL, UC Berkeley, et al.) ISO 11179 prototype Bioportal, Protege [medical ontologies, ontology editor, etc. ](Stanford) Swoogle (UMBC) ontology search engine OBO [biological ontologies, frame based] Ecocyc, etc. [microbial ontologies, frame based] (SRI) OMG ODM (Ontology Definition Metamodel) Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 28

Knowledge Representation Languages Resource Description Framework (RDF) OWL-DL (description logic) OWL-Full (first order logic) Common Logic (first order logic) OBO (frame based) Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 29

Additional Resources http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl? OntologySummit2008_Communique http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl? OntologySummit2008 http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl? OpenOntologyRepository Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 30

Contact Info Frank Olken folken@nsf.gov 703-292-7350 National Science Foundation Computer and Information Science and Engineering Directorate Intelligent Information Systems Division Information Integration and Informatics Program 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1125, Arlington, VA 22230 Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 31

OOR Initiative Contacts Peter Yim peter.yim@cim3.com Leo Obrst (MITRE) lobrst@mitre.org Michelle Raymond (Honeywell) michellearaymond@gmail.com Mark Musen (Stanford) musen@stanford.edu Mike Dean (BBN) mdean@bbn.com Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 32

Acknowledgments My portion of this work has been supported by the National Science Foundation under the Individual Research Plan, as a part of my IPA appointment to NSF from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Sept. 11, 2008 OOR Talk to CENDI/NKOS, F. Olken 33