WECC Criterion INT-001-WECC-CRT-2.13

Similar documents
WECC Criterion INT-001-WECC-CRT-3

WECC Criterion MOD-(11 and 13)-WECC-CRT-1.1

Standard INT Dynamic Transfers

This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective.

Standard INT Dynamic Transfers

WECC Board of Directors. Approved Regional Criteria

Standard INT Interchange Authority Distributes Arranged Interchange

BC Hydro Open Access Transmission Tariff Effective: January 26, 2018 OATT Attachment Q-1 First Revision of Page 1

WON Security Guideline

primary Control Center, for the exchange of Real-time data with its Balancing

WECC Internal Controls Evaluation Process WECC Compliance Oversight Effective date: October 15, 2017

Coordinate Interchange

Coordinate Interchange

Standard COM Communication and Coordination

bcuc British Columbia Utilities Commission

Introduction. ADSTF Report of Lessons Learned from the Implementation of the 2028 ADS Anchor Data Set Task Force February 22, 2019

Open Access Transmission Tariff of Southern Companies

Proposed Convention for Numbering of NERC Reliability Standards Draft September 9, 2004

History of NERC August 2013

NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY CORPORATION

This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective.

Bryan Carr PMP, CISA Compliance Auditor Cyber Security. Audit Evidence & Attachment G CIP 101 Salt Lake City, UT September 25, 2013

History of NERC December 2012

A. Introduction. B. Requirements and Measures

Standards Authorization Request Form

NERC CIP Information Protection

Unofficial Comment Form Project Operating Personnel Communications Protocols COM-002-4

5. Effective Date: The first day of the first calendar quarter after applicable regulatory approval.

Designation and Termination of Network Resources

Physical Security Reliability Standard Implementation

November 9, Revisions to the Violation Risk Factors for Reliability Standards IRO and TOP

Québec Reliability Standards Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program Implementation Plan Annual Implementation Plan

Path Operations post WECC TOP 007 Rob Witham, WAPA RMR TSS Supervisor

Cyber Security Reliability Standards CIP V5 Transition Guidance:

Standards Authorization Request Form

Standard Development Timeline

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments

Standard Authorization Request Form

Standard COM-002-2a Communications and Coordination

This draft standard is being posted for an initial comment and ballot. The draft includes modifications to meet the directives of FERC Order No. 791.

Quarter 3, 2007 (2007Q3) Generation Deliverability Assessment Study Plan

NERC Overview and Compliance Update

Standard CIP Cyber Security Incident Reporting and Response Planning

Standard Authorization Request Form

Grid Security & NERC. Council of State Governments. Janet Sena, Senior Vice President, Policy and External Affairs September 22, 2016

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (RTL-1) Docket No Witness: Rick T. Link BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH

Compliance Enforcement Initiative

Project Retirement of Reliability Standard Requirements

History of NERC January 2018

Standard CIP 007 4a Cyber Security Systems Security Management

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

FNM Expansion Training Webinar

RELIABILITY COMPLIANCE ENFORCEMENT IN ONTARIO

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber As s et Identification

Standard CIP 005 4a Cyber Security Electronic Security Perimeter(s)

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber As s et Identification

ATTACHMENT F Form of Service Agreement for Wholesale Network Integration Transmission Service

Self-Certification Tutorial. Version 1.0 April 2013

March 15, 2011 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Standard TOP Transmission Operations

Missouri Housing Development Commission Certified Property Management Agent Program

Proposed Improvements for NERC MOD Standards July 10, 2012

This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective.

Standard Development Timeline

New Brunswick 2018 Annual Implementation Plan Version 1

Energy Imbalance Market: PacifiCorp Stakeholder and Tariff Revision Plan

Enhanced Curtailment Calculator Update

Standard CIP 007 3a Cyber Security Systems Security Management

Proposed Clean and Redline for Version 2 Implementation Plan

SPP RTO Compliance Forum Western Area Power Administration March 11, 2015

Analysis of CIP-006 and CIP-007 Violations

Unofficial Comment Form Project Modifications to CIP Standards Virtualization in the CIP Environment

NERC Relay Loadability Standard Reliability Standards Webinar November 23, 2010

Standards Authorization Request Justification

Standard CIP-006-4c Cyber Security Physical Security

Unofficial Comment Form Project Operating Personnel Communications Protocols COM Operating Personnel Communications Protocols

Standard Development Timeline

Misoperation Information Data Analysis System

CIP Cyber Security Personnel & Training

1. SAR posted for comment on January 15, Standard Drafting Team appointed on January 29, 2014

North American Energy Standards Board

British Columbia Utilities Commission Reliability Standards with Effective Dates adopted in British Columbia

Internal Controls Evaluation (ICE) Processing

Standard CIP-006-3c Cyber Security Physical Security

TOP-010-1(i) Real-time Reliability Monitoring and Analysis Capabilities

NERC Request for Data or Information: Protection System Misoperation Data Collection August 14, 2014

Standard CIP Cyber Security Electronic Security Perimeter(s)

BAL Real Power Ba la ncing Control Performance Standard Background Document

Unofficial Comment Form

1. Post for 45-day comment period and pre-ballot review. 7/26/ Conduct initial ballot. 8/30/2010

DRAFT. Cyber Security Communications between Control Centers. March May Technical Rationale and Justification for Reliability Standard CIP-012-1

Standard Development Timeline

MOD Transmission Reliability Margin Implementation Document

Hetch Hetchy Water and Power of the City and County of San Francisco. Joint Transmission Planning Base Case Preparation Process

Reliability Standard Audit Worksheet 1

Proposal for Development and Use of Node- Breaker Topology Representations for Offline and Real-time Study Models November 12, 2013

NERC Management Response to the Questions of the NERC Board of Trustees on Reliability Standard COM September 6, 2013

Standard CIP Cyber Security Security Management Controls

Standard CIP Cyber Security Systems Security Management

System Impact Study for Power Supply 400 MW Import on the EAL BCHA Path

Transcription:

WECC Criterion INT-001-WECC-CRT-2.13 A. Introduction 1. Title: e-tag Requirements for WECC including Wrongful Denial and Loss of Communication ProceduresRequest for Interchange (RFI) 2. Number: INT-001-WECC-CRT-2.13 3. Purpose: To manage Arranged Interchange and address evaluation errors and to provide flexibility in how losses may be communicated when the losses are not explicitly addressed in North American Electricity Reliability Corporation Reliability (NERC) Standards or North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Business Practice Standards, but are considered necessary for transactions sinking within the Western Interconnection. 4. Applicability: 4.1. Functional Entities: 4.1.1. Balancing Authorities 4.1.2. Transmission Service ProvidersProvider 5. Effective Date: December 9, 2010The first day of the second quarter following WECC Board of Director approval. WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORDINATING COUNCIL 155 North 400 West, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84103-1114

Page 2 of 7 B. Requirements and Measures WR1. In the event that a curtailment is required on a Balancing Authority s transmission system and a Transmission Service Provider s transmission system (or a portion thereof) to maintain reliable operation of such system, each Balancing Authority and each Each Balancing Authority and Transmission Service Provider shall use the e-tag as the primary tool to communicate reliability-adjustment Arranged Interchange.Reliability Adjustment RFIs, when transmission curtailment on its system is required. WM1. Each Balancing Authority and each Transmission Service Provider shall providewill have evidence that, subsequent to each reliability event requiring an Interchange Transaction reliability adjustment, it used the e-tag tool was used to communicate reliability adjustment(s).as its primary tool to communicate Reliability Adjustment RFIs, as required in WR1. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, production of the associated e-tag. WR2. Each Balancing Authority and each Transmission Service Provider that receives an Onontime Arranged Interchange, an Emergency Arranged Interchangeemergency RFI, or a Reliability Adjustment InterchangeRFI for reliability assessment, shall approve its transition to Confirmed Interchange, unless one of the following occurs: an Arranged Interchange field is incomplete the Arranged Interchange field is not factually correct the implementationimplementation of the Confirmed Interchange would result in violation of anya NERC Reliability Standard, NAESB Business Practice Standard, WECC Regional Criterion, Transmission Service Provider Transmission Tariff, or WECC Regional Criterionbusiness practice. WM2. In those cases where the interchange transaction was denied, each Balancing Authority and each Transmission Service Provider shall providewill have evidence of one of the following, as required in WR2: an Arranged Interchange field is incomplete the Arranged Interchange field is not factually correct the acceptanceacceptance of an Arranged Interchange would have resulted in the violation of any NERC Reliability Standard, NAESB Business Practice Standard, WECC Regional Criterion, Transmission Service Provider Transmission Tariff, or WECC Regional Criterionbusiness practice.

Page 3 of 7 WR3. Each Balancing Authority and each Transmission Service Provider that incorrectly denies the transition of Arranged Interchange to Confirmed Interchange or allows Onon-time Arranged Interchange, an Emergency Arranged Interchangeemergency RFI, or a Reliability Adjustment Arranged InterchangeRFI to transition to EXPIRED, shall take the following corrective action: CorrectIf the Arranged Interchange has not transitioned to a final composite state, correct its denial by approving the transition from Arranged Interchange to Confirmed Interchange if the Arranged Interchange has not transitioned to a final composite state. Contact the submitter of the Request for Interchange and request that they re-submit the Request for Interchange ifif the Arranged Interchange has transitioned to a final composite state of DENIED or EXPIRED., contact the submitter of the RFI and request that they re-submit the RFI. Approve or deny the transition of the re-submitted Arranged Interchange to Confirmed Interchange, subject to WR2 above except, without consideration to the Time Classification (late status). Contact any other entitylate time classification. Contact those remaining entities that hashave yet to approve or hashave denied the transition from Arranged Interchange to Confirmed Interchange and communicate to them that the Arranged Interchange is subject to this Regional Criterion.document. WM3. Each Balancing Authority and each Transmission Service Provider shall providewill have evidence that corrective action was taken if either the Balancing Authority or the Transmission Service Provider incorrectly allowed Onon-time Arranged Interchange, an Emergency Arranged Interchangeemergency RFI, or a Reliability Adjustment InterchangeRFI to transition to a final composite state of DENIED or EXPIRED, as required in WR3. Examples of evidence to prove corrective action was taken may include, but is not limited to, voice recordings, dispatcher logs, or other related records. WR4. Each Balancing Authority and each Transmission Service Provider that submitssubmitting a Reliability Adjustment Request for InterchangeRFI that sets the reliability limit below the actual available reliability limit shall submit a new Reliability Adjustment Request for InterchangeRFI with the accurate reliability limit within five minutes after discovering the error. WM4. Each Balancing Authority and each Transmission Service Provider shall providewill have evidence that a new Reliability Adjustment Request for InterchangeRFI was submitted. The submittal time on the Request for Interchange of when the limit was

Page 4 of 7 cleared (reloaded) may be compared against the time stamp of voice recordings, dispatcher logs, or other pertinent records. WR5. Each Transmission Service Provider that employs concurrent loss accounting shall post,, as required in its business practices, requirements for concurrent loss deliveries. These requirements shall instruct transmission customers as to the preferred communication of these deliveries, and shall either be a separate Request for Interchange with the Transaction Type field set to Loss Supply or be information contained in the Loss Accounting section of the same Request for Interchange. WM5. Each Transmission Service Provider shall provide evidence that its loss requirements are set out in its posted business practices.wr4.

Page 5 of 7 Version History Version Date Action Change Tracking 2 1 Initial Tracking INT-BPS-001-2 3 2 September 6, 2007 Requirements change. Change to 3. 1 August 31, 2009 Designation change to Criterion. Developed as WECC-0053. INT-BPS-001-3. Delete WR3.1.2 as e-tag 1.8 TSP no longer allowed in the Scheduling Entity field; deleted the or in WR3.1.1 as there is no or with deletion of 3.1.2; deleted WR4.1 because there never was a 4.1. Renamed: INT-001-WECC-CRT-01 2 October 20, 2010 Standing Committee Approved Approved for Board review as INT-001-WECC-CRT-02 2 December 9, 2010 WECC Board of Directors Approved Updated as part of INT Rewrite Project 2 September 5, 2012 Board changed designation INT-001-WECC-CRT-2 changed to INT-001-WECC-RBP-2 2 June 25, 2014 Board changed designation INT-001-WECC-RBP-2 changed to INT-001-WECC-CRT-2 2.1 January 28, 2016 Errata The word of was inserted into the Title line. 2.1 April 1, 2016 No Change Converted to new template 3 June 21, 2017 WECC Standards Committee for approval. Developed as WECC-0121A. Five-year review. Conformed to drafting conventions. Capitalized terms changed to lower case where possible. Disclaimer WECC receives data used in its analyses from a wide variety of sources. WECC strives to source its data from reliable entities and undertakes reasonable efforts to validate the accuracy of the data used. WECC believes the data contained herein and used in its analyses is accurate and reliable. However, WECC disclaims any and all representations, guarantees, warranties, and liability for the information contained herein and any use thereof. Persons who use and rely on the information contained herein do so at their own risk. 1 Previous Tracking System 2 Previous Tracking System

Page 6 of 7 Attachments Not Usedused. Attachment A

Page 7 of 7 Rationale A Rationale section is optional. If Rationale Boxes were used during the development of this project, the content of those boxes appears below. Rationale Boxes were not developed for this project.

2024 © technodocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback