Conversion of Company Standard Trial Data to SDTM

Similar documents
2 nd ehs Workshop, CC-IN2P3 14 th October 2015, Lyon,

Legacy to SDTM Conversion Workshop: Tools and Techniques

Hanming Tu, Accenture, Berwyn, USA

AUTOMATED CREATION OF SUBMISSION-READY ARTIFACTS SILAS MCKEE

Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here.

From Implementing CDISC Using SAS. Full book available for purchase here. About This Book... xi About The Authors... xvii Acknowledgments...

CDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library. Guang-liang Wang September 18, Q3 DCDISC Meeting

Automated Creation of Submission-Ready Artifacts Silas McKee, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA Lourdes Devenney, Accenture, Pennsylvania, USA

Optimization of the traceability when applying an ADaM Parallel Conversion Method

Paper FC02. SDTM, Plus or Minus. Barry R. Cohen, Octagon Research Solutions, Wayne, PA

Reporting & Visualisation : D un Dun standard maison au format CDISC 02/02/2016 CDISC GUF 1

How a Metadata Repository enables dynamism and automation in SDTM-like dataset generation

How to write ADaM specifications like a ninja.

Study Data Reviewer s Guide Completion Guideline

Best Practices for E2E DB build process and Efficiency on CDASH to SDTM data Tao Yang, FMD K&L, Nanjing, China

From ODM to SDTM: An End-to-End Approach Applied to Phase I Clinical Trials

SAS offers technology to facilitate working with CDISC standards : the metadata perspective.

Dataset-XML - A New CDISC Standard

Programming checks: Reviewing the overall quality of the deliverables without parallel programming

PhUSE Paper SD09. "Overnight" Conversion to SDTM Datasets Ready for SDTM Submission Niels Mathiesen, mathiesen & mathiesen, Basel, Switzerland

Common Programming Errors in CDISC Data

CBER STUDY DATA STANDARDS UPDATE

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Retrospective vs. Prospective Data Standardization

Managing your metadata efficiently - a structured way to organise and frontload your analysis and submission data

Improving CDISC SDTM Data Quality & Compliance Right from the Beginning

Step Up Your ADaM Compliance Game Ramesh Ayyappath & Graham Oakley

Metadata and ADaM.

The application of SDTM in a disease (oncology)-oriented organization

The Wonderful World of Define.xml.. Practical Uses Today. Mark Wheeldon, CEO, Formedix DC User Group, Washington, 9 th December 2008

Improving Metadata Compliance and Assessing Quality Metrics with a Standards Library

CDISC SDTM and ADaM Real World Issues

PhUSE US Connect 2019

SDTM Implementation Guide Clear as Mud: Strategies for Developing Consistent Company Standards

Introduction to ADaM and What s new in ADaM

DIA 11234: CDER Data Standards Common Issues Document webinar questions

The New SDTMIG What s Different from Previous Versions

SAS Clinical Data Integration Server 2.1

AUTOMATED SDTM CREATION AND DISCREPANCY DETECTION JOBS: THE NUMBERS TELL THE TALE. Joris De Bondt PhUSE Conference Oct 2014

Advantages of a real end-to-end approach with CDISC standards

SAS Clinical Data Integration 2.4

Going Against the Flow: Backmapping SDTM Data

Managing CDISC version changes: how & when to implement? Presented by Lauren Shinaberry, Project Manager Business & Decision Life Sciences

An Alternate Way to Create the Standard SDTM Domains

Data Science Services Dirk Engfer Page 1 of 5

IS03: An Introduction to SDTM Part II. Jennie Mc Guirk

Data Standards with and without CDISC

Advanced Data Visualization using TIBCO Spotfire and SAS using SDTM. Ajay Gupta, PPD

Dealing with changing versions of SDTM and Controlled Terminology (CT)

Considerations on creation of SDTM datasets for extended studies

PharmaSUG 2014 PO16. Category CDASH SDTM ADaM. Submission in standardized tabular form. Structure Flexible Rigid Flexible * No Yes Yes

PharmaSUG Paper PO21

Leveraging Study Data Reviewer s Guide (SDRG) in Building FDA s Confidence in Sponsor s Submitted Datasets

Standardising The Standards The Benefits of Consistency

Customer oriented CDISC implementation

An Introduction to Analysis (and Repository) Databases (ARDs)

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION WHERE TO START? 1. DATA CHECK FOR CONSISTENCIES

SAS Clinical Data Integration 2.6

PhUSE EU Connect Paper PP15. Stop Copying CDISC Standards. Craig Parry, SyneQuaNon, Diss, England

Lex Jansen Octagon Research Solutions, Inc.

Johannes Ulander. Standardisation and Harmonisation Specialist S-Cubed. PhUSE SDE Beerse,

Study Data Reviewer s Guide

IBIS. Case Study: Image Data Management System. IBISimg at Novartis using Oracle Database 11g Multimedia DICOM

Creating a Patient Profile using CDISC SDTM Marc Desgrousilliers, Clinovo, Sunnyvale, CA Romain Miralles, Clinovo, Sunnyvale, CA

Standardizing FDA Data to Improve Success in Pediatric Drug Development

FDA Study Data Technical Conformance Guide v4.2

Sandra Minjoe, Accenture Life Sciences John Brega, PharmaStat. PharmaSUG Single Day Event San Francisco Bay Area

Submission-Ready Define.xml Files Using SAS Clinical Data Integration Melissa R. Martinez, SAS Institute, Cary, NC USA

Comparison of FDA and PMDA Requirements for Electronic Submission of Study Data

How to review a CRF - A statistical programmer perspective

Converting Data to the SDTM Standard Using SAS Data Integration Studio

Riepilogo e Spazio Q&A

SDTM Automation with Standard CRF Pages Taylor Markway, SCRI Development Innovations, Carrboro, NC

Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences, Chennai, India

DCDISC Users Group. Nate Freimark Omnicare Clinical Research Presented on

Introduction to CDASH

Now let s take a look

CDASH MODEL 1.0 AND CDASHIG 2.0. Kathleen Mellars Special Thanks to the CDASH Model and CDASHIG Teams

Standards Metadata Management (System)

Robust approach to create Define.xml v2.0. Vineet Jain

PharmaSUG Paper CD16

Data Standardisation, Clinical Data Warehouse and SAS Standard Programs

Out-of-the-box %definexml

The Submission Data File System Automating the Creation of CDISC SDTM and ADaM Datasets

Automation of SDTM Programming in Oncology Disease Response Domain Yiwen Wang, Yu Cheng, Ju Chen Eli Lilly and Company, China

Challenges with the interpreta/on of CDISC - Who can we trust?

Hands-On ADaM ADAE Development Sandra Minjoe, Accenture Life Sciences, Wayne, Pennsylvania Kim Minkalis, Accenture Life Sciences, Wayne, Pennsylvania

Step by Step to PROC CDISC and More

Beyond OpenCDISC: Using Define.xml Metadata to Ensure End-to-End Submission Integrity. John Brega Linda Collins PharmaStat LLC

The Benefits of Traceability Beyond Just From SDTM to ADaM in CDISC Standards Maggie Ci Jiang, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Great Valley, PA

CDISC Implementation Step by Step: A Real World Example

SDTM Attribute Checking Tool Ellen Xiao, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

SDTM-ETL TM. New features in version 1.6. Author: Jozef Aerts XML4Pharma July SDTM-ETL TM : New features in v.1.6

Material covered in the Dec 2014 FDA Binding Guidances

A SDTM Legacy Data Conversion

Experience of electronic data submission via Gateway to PMDA

PharmaSUG Paper DS06 Designing and Tuning ADaM Datasets. Songhui ZHU, K&L Consulting Services, Fort Washington, PA

EDC integrations. Rob Jongen Integration Technology & Data Standards

ODM The Operational Efficiency Model: Using ODM to Deliver Proven Cost and Time Savings in Study Set-up

A Taste of SDTM in Real Time

One Project, Two Teams: The Unblind Leading the Blind

Transcription:

Conversion of Company Standard Trial Data to SDTM CDISC Italian-Speaking User Group Meeting Milan, Italy March 6, 2009 Jennifer Lin, Niki Molnar Novartis Vaccines

Agenda Our Clinical Data Management Environment Major Transformation Decisions SDTM Conversion Tool Mapping of Non-Standard Data Validation Trial Metadata Resources Used

Our Clinical Data Management (CDM) Environment Novartis Vaccines division separate from Pharma and Diagnostics relatively small group (e.g., 17 statistical programmers) existed for many years as Chiron

Our Clinical Data Management (CDM) Environment Vaccines studies are characterized by: relatively small number of data domains similar data collection profiles from study to study

Our Clinical Data Management (CDM) Environment: Data Flow Inform or Clintrial Database NVS Datasets TFLs

Our Clinical Data Management (CDM) Environment In our favor: strong standard developed over 10 years (NVS) only approximately 12 panels to convert not too much non-standard per study most of the decision-makers located at the same site

Our Clinical Data Management (CDM) Environment Challenges: few people lean budget lots of applications relying on NVS format too many other urgent priorities = changing a wheel on a moving express train!

Major Transformation Decisions 1. Focus on generic transformation tool first can produce SDTM datasets without requiring change to any other applications can transform legacy data for eventual data warehouse

Major Transformation Decisions 2. Use in-house SAS programmer develop in-house CDISC expertise application can be completely customized to our needs skilled SAS programmer had time budget was lean

Major Transformation Decisions: Data Flow Inform or Clintrial Database NVS Datasets SDTM Datasets TFLs

Major Transformation Decisions: Data Flow Inform or Clintrial Database NVS Datasets SDTM Datasets TFLs SDTM Conversion Tool

SDTM Conversion Tool Web application Converts 12 NVS panels into 17 CDISC domains ADVERSE CMED COMMENTS DEATH DEMOG IMMUN LABSEDT MEDHX POSTINJ PREGRPT PREGFU STUDYTER AE, SUPPAE CM, SUPPCM CO DS, SUPPDS DM, SUPPDM, DS, SC EX, SUPPEX LB, SUPPLB MH, SUPPMH AE, SUPPAE, VS SUPPDM SUPPDM DS, SUPPDS

SDTM Conversion Tool: Prerequisites Input datasets must be located in development study folder (i.e., \DEVEL\SSD in the folder path)

SDTM Conversion Tool Leverages the fact that every study has a standard folder structure in Windows: E:\PROJNAME\STUDYNAME\PURPOSE\VALIDATION_LE VEL\FILETYPE PURPOSE: e.g., 03MAY09_Analysis VALIDATION_LEVEL: DEVEL, QA, PROD FILETYPE: e.g., SSD, SAS, SDTM

SDTM Conversion Tool: User Input

SDTM Conversion Tool: User Input

SDTM Conversion Tool: User Input

SDTM Conversion Tool: User Input

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM output

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata Listing

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata Listing #4. Discrepancy Listing

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata Listing #4. Discrepancy Listing

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata listing #4. Discrepancy Listing

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata listing #4. Discrepancy Listing

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata listing #4. Discrepancy Listing

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata listing #4. Discrepancy Listing

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata listing #4. Discrepancy Listing Promote all programs to PROD after validation Run cdisc_run_all_sdtm.sas after promotion to generate all sdtm datasets in PROD\SDTM

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata listing #4. Discrepancy Listing

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata listing #4. Discrepancy Listing A listing of the standard mappings conducted by the SDTM Conversion Tool.

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata listing #4. Discrepancy Listing

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output #1. DEVEL\SDTM Output #2. SAS code for generating SDTM in DEVEL\SAS #3. Metadata listing #4. Discrepancy Listing A listing of the discrepancies, i.e., the non-standard panels or variables that could not be mapped by the SDTM Transformation Tool.

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output

SDTM Conversion Tool: Output

SDTM Conversion Tool: Process

SDTM Conversion Tool Not handled by the SDTM Conversion Tool: Mapping of non-standard data Validation Trial Design Data (e.g., number of visits, phase, milestones)

Mapping of Non-Standard Data Identified by discrepancy listing Specs to be written by the Statistical Programmer, and signed off by the Study Statistician Write the code! New panel: cdisc_mk_sdtm_surghx.sas Preproc: cdisc_preproc_demog.sas Postproc:cdisc_postproc_demog.sas

Validation Validate all SDTM Datasets against NVS datasets OQ / Peer Review Budget extra validation time

Trial Design Data Part of SDTM submission Trial Specific Data, e.g., protocol title, trial phase, trial blinding schema Initially to be manually collected Plan to automate this

SDTM Conversion Tool Resources Programmed using SAS 9.1 Windows and SAS/INTRNET Specifications completed in 3 mos. with 4 people meeting 2x per week for 1 hour Programming completed by 1 programmer in 1 year working in between many other projects Validation has not started

Questions?