THE RESTRAINED EDGE MONOPHONIC NUMBER OF A GRAPH

Similar documents
The Restrained Edge Geodetic Number of a Graph

The Edge Fixing Edge-To-Vertex Monophonic Number Of A Graph

The upper open monophonic number of a graph

The Lower and Upper Forcing Edge-to-vertex Geodetic Numbers of a Graph

Monophonic Chromatic Parameter in a Connected Graph

GEODETIC DOMINATION IN GRAPHS

Discrete Mathematics. Elixir Dis. Math. 92 (2016)

A note on isolate domination

[Ramalingam, 4(12): December 2017] ISSN DOI /zenodo Impact Factor

CHARACTERIZING SYMMETRIC DIAMETRICAL GRAPHS OF ORDER 12 AND DIAMETER 4

PAijpam.eu TOTAL CO-INDEPENDENT DOMINATION OF JUMP GRAPH

Discrete Applied Mathematics. A revision and extension of results on 4-regular, 4-connected, claw-free graphs

Degree Equitable Domination Number and Independent Domination Number of a Graph

On the Geodetic Number of Line Graph

Number Theory and Graph Theory

K 4 C 5. Figure 4.5: Some well known family of graphs

Eccentric Coloring of a Graph

SIGN DOMINATING SWITCHED INVARIANTS OF A GRAPH

Weighted Geodetic Convex Sets in A Graph

Triple Connected Domination Number of a Graph

Strong Triple Connected Domination Number of a Graph

Some bounds on chromatic number of NI graphs

LOCAL CONNECTIVE CHROMATIC NUMBER OF DIRECT PRODUCT OF PATHS AND CYCLES

The Dual Neighborhood Number of a Graph

Triple Connected Complementary Tree Domination Number Of A Graph V. Murugan et al.,

Binding Number of Some Special Classes of Trees

Complete Cototal Domination

Chromatic Transversal Domatic Number of Graphs

S. K. Vaidya and Rakhimol V. Isaac

Strong and Semi Strong Outer Mod Sum Graphs

Average D-distance Between Edges of a Graph

Section 3.1: Nonseparable Graphs Cut vertex of a connected graph G: A vertex x G such that G x is not connected. Theorem 3.1, p. 57: Every connected

Two Characterizations of Hypercubes

Complementary Acyclic Weak Domination Preserving Sets

Math 170- Graph Theory Notes

A NOTE ON RADIUS AND DIAMETER OF A GRAPH W.R.T. D-DISTANCE

On Independent Equitable Cototal Dominating set of graph

Bipartite Roots of Graphs

CLAW-FREE 3-CONNECTED P 11 -FREE GRAPHS ARE HAMILTONIAN

GRAPHS WITH 1-FACTORS

Eccentric domination in splitting graph of some graphs

International Journal of Mathematical Archive-7(9), 2016, Available online through ISSN

DOUBLE DOMINATION CRITICAL AND STABLE GRAPHS UPON VERTEX REMOVAL 1

Some Properties of Glue Graph

{ 1} Definitions. 10. Extremal graph theory. Problem definition Paths and cycles Complete subgraphs

Orientable convexity, geodetic and hull numbers in graphs

ON WIENER INDEX OF GRAPH COMPLEMENTS. Communicated by Alireza Abdollahi. 1. Introduction

DETOUR DOMINATION NUMBER OF A GRAPH

RAINBOW CONNECTION AND STRONG RAINBOW CONNECTION NUMBERS OF

On vertex types of graphs

Super connectivity of line graphs

Former Bulletin of Society of Mathematicians Banja Luka ISSN (p), ISSN X (o)

Recognizing Interval Bigraphs by Forbidden Patterns

THE CONNECTED COMPLEMENT DOMINATION IN GRAPHS V.MOHANASELVI 1. Assistant Professor of Mathematics, Nehru Memorial College, Puthanampatti,

Gracefulness of a New Class from Copies of kc 4 P 2n and P 2 * nc 3

A Note On The Sparing Number Of The Sieve Graphs Of Certain Graphs

On Sequential Topogenic Graphs

International Journal of Mathematical Archive-6(10), 2015, Available online through ISSN

Matching Algorithms. Proof. If a bipartite graph has a perfect matching, then it is easy to see that the right hand side is a necessary condition.

Domination Number of Jump Graph

Efficient Triple Connected Domination Number of a Graph

Roman Domination in Complementary Prism Graphs

DO NOT RE-DISTRIBUTE THIS SOLUTION FILE

Radio Number for Special Family of Graphs with Diameter 2, 3 and 4

NEIGHBOURHOOD SUM CORDIAL LABELING OF GRAPHS

Technische Universität Ilmenau Institut für Mathematik

THE RAINBOW DOMINATION SUBDIVISION NUMBERS OF GRAPHS. N. Dehgardi, S. M. Sheikholeslami and L. Volkmann. 1. Introduction

On Locating Domination Number of. Boolean Graph BG 2 (G)

DEFINITION OF GRAPH GRAPH THEORY GRAPHS ACCORDING TO THEIR VERTICES AND EDGES EXAMPLE GRAPHS ACCORDING TO THEIR VERTICES AND EDGES

CLASSES OF VERY STRONGLY PERFECT GRAPHS. Ganesh R. Gandal 1, R. Mary Jeya Jothi 2. 1 Department of Mathematics. Sathyabama University Chennai, INDIA

Rigidity, connectivity and graph decompositions

Extremal Graph Theory: Turán s Theorem

(5.2) 151 Math Exercises. Graph Terminology and Special Types of Graphs. Malek Zein AL-Abidin

Vertex 3-colorability of claw-free graphs

ON VERTEX b-critical TREES. Mostafa Blidia, Noureddine Ikhlef Eschouf, and Frédéric Maffray

Chapter 4. square sum graphs. 4.1 Introduction

A CHARACTERIZATION FOR 2-SELF-CENTERED GRAPHS

Section 8.2 Graph Terminology. Undirected Graphs. Definition: Two vertices u, v in V are adjacent or neighbors if there is an edge e between u and v.

Journal of mathematics and computer science 10 (2014),

Modules. 6 Hamilton Graphs (4-8 lectures) Introduction Necessary conditions and sufficient conditions Exercises...

Ma/CS 6b Class 5: Graph Connectivity

Some Remarks on the Geodetic Number of a Graph

Some Upper Bounds for Signed Star Domination Number of Graphs. S. Akbari, A. Norouzi-Fard, A. Rezaei, R. Rotabi, S. Sabour.

Super vertex Gracefulness of Some Special Graphs

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 28 Nov 2016

CUT VERTICES IN ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS OF FINITE COMMUTATIVE RINGS

Rainbow game domination subdivision number of a graph

We need the following Theorems for our further results: MAIN RESULTS

THE SEMIENTIRE DOMINATING GRAPH

On median graphs and median grid graphs

Module 7. Independent sets, coverings. and matchings. Contents

Double Vertex Graphs and Complete Double Vertex Graphs. Jobby Jacob, Wayne Goddard and Renu Laskar Clemson University April, 2007

Theorem 3.1 (Berge) A matching M in G is maximum if and only if there is no M- augmenting path.

On the packing numbers in graphs arxiv: v1 [math.co] 26 Jul 2017

Infinite locally random graphs

Geodesic Convexity and Cartesian Products in Graphs

DOMINATION GAME: EXTREMAL FAMILIES FOR THE 3/5-CONJECTURE FOR FORESTS

Characterizations of graph classes by forbidden configurations

AVERAGE D-DISTANCE BETWEEN VERTICES OF A GRAPH

MC 302 GRAPH THEORY 10/1/13 Solutions to HW #2 50 points + 6 XC points

Transcription:

BULLETIN OF THE INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICAL VIRTUAL INSTITUTE ISSN (p) 2303-4874, ISSN (o) 2303-4955 www.imvibl.org /JOURNALS / BULLETIN Vol. 7(1)(2017), 23-30 Former BULLETIN OF THE SOCIETY OF MATHEMATICIANS BANJA LUKA ISSN 0354-5792 (o), ISSN 1986-521X (p) THE RESTRAINED EDGE MONOPHONIC NUMBER OF A GRAPH P. Titus 1, A.P. Santhakumaran 2 and K. Ganesamoorthy 3 Abstract. A set S of vertices of a connected graph G is a monophonic set if every vertex of G lies on an x y monophonic path for some elements x and y in S. The minimum cardinality of a monophonic set of G is the monophonic number of G, denoted by m(g). A set S of vertices of a graph G is an edge monophonic set if every edge of G lies on an x y monophonic path for some elements x and y in S. The minimum cardinality of an edge monophonic set of G is the edge monophonic number of G, denoted by em(g). A set S of vertices of a graph G is a restrained edge monophonic set if either V = S or S is an edge monophonic set with the subgraph G[V S] induced by V S has no isolated vertices. The minimum cardinality of a restrained edge monophonic set of G is the restrained edge monophonic number of G and is denoted by em r(g). It is proved that, for the integers a,b and c with 3 a b < c, there exists a connected graph G having the monophonic number a, the edge monophonic number b and the restrained edge monophonic number c. 1. Introduction By a graph G = (V,E) we mean a simple graph of order at least two. The order and size of G are denoted by p and q, respectively. For basic graph theoretic terminology, we refer to Harary [5]. The neighborhood of a vertex v is the set N(v) consisting of all vertices u which are adjacent with v. The closed neighborhood of a vertex v is the set N[v] = N(v) {v}. A vertex v is an extreme vertex if the subgraph induced by its neighbors is complete. A vertex v is a semi-extreme vertex of G if the subgraph induced by its neighbors has a full degree vertex in N(v). In particular, every extreme vertex is a semi-extreme vertex and a semi-extreme vertex need not be an extreme vertex. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 05C12. Key words and phrases. monophonic set, monophonic number, edge monophonic set, edge monophonic number, restrained edge monophonic set, restrained edge monophonic number. 23

24 P. TITUS, A.P. SANTHAKUMARAN AND K. GANESAMOORTHY For any two vertices x and y in a connected graph G, the distance d(x,y) is the length of a shortest x y path in G. An x y path of length d(x,y) is called an x y geodesic. A vertex v is said to lie on an x y geodesic P if v is a vertex of P including the vertices x and y. The closed interval I[x,y] consists of all vertices lying on some x y geodesic of G, while for S V, I[S] = I[x,y]. A set S of vertices is a geodetic set if x,y S I[S] = V, and the minimum cardinality of a geodetic set is the geodetic number g(g). A geodetic set of cardinality g(g) is called a g-set. The geodetic number of a graph was introduced in [1, 6] and further studied in [2, 3, 4, 5]. A set S of vertices of a graph G is an edge geodetic set if every edge of G lies on an x y geodesic for some elements x and y in S. The minimum cardinality of an edge geodetic set of G is the edge geodetic number of G, denoted by eg(g). The edge geodetic number was introduced and studied in [8]. A set S of vertices of G is a restrained edge geodetic set of G if S is an edge geodetic set, and if either S = V or the subgraph G[V S] induced by V S has no isolated vertices. The minimum cardinality of a restrained edge geodetic set of G is the restrained edge geodetic number, denoted by eg r (G). The restrained edge geodetic number of a graph was introduced and studied in [10]. A chord of a path u 1,u 2,...,u k in G is an edge u i u j with j i + 2. A u-v path P is called a monophonic path if it is a chordless path. A set S of vertices is a monophonic set if every vertex of G lies on a monophonic path joining some pair of vertices in S, and the minimum cardinality of a monophonic set is the monophonic number m(g). A monophonic set of cardinality m(g) is called an m-set of G. The monophonic number of a graph G was studied in [9]. A set S of vertices of a graph G is an edge monophonic set if every edge of G lies on an x y monophonic path for some elements x and y in S. The minimum cardinality of an edge monophonic set of G is the edge monophonic number of G, denoted by em(g). A set S of vertices of a graph G is a restrained monophonic set if either S = V or S is an monophonic set with the subgraph G[V S] induced by V S has no isolated vertices. The minimum cardinality of a restrained monophonic set of G is the restrained monophonic number of G, and is denoted by m r (G). The restrained monophonic number of a graph was studied in [11]. The following theorems will be used in the sequel. Theorem 1.1. [5] Let v be a vertex of a connected graph G. The following statements are equivalent: (i) v is a cut vertex of G. (ii) There exist vertices u and w distinct from v such that v is on every u w path. (iii) There exists a partition of the set of vertices V {v} into subsets U and W such that for any vertices u U and w W, the vertex v is on every u w path. Theorem 1.2. [9] Each extreme vertex of a connected graph G belongs to every monophonic set of G.

THE RESTRAINED EDGE MONOPHONIC NUMBER OF A GRAPH 25 Throughout this paper G denotes a connected graph with at least two vertices. 2. Restrained Edge Monophonic Number Definition 2.1. A set S of vertices of a graph G is a restrained edge monophonic set if either V = S or S is an edge monophonic set with the subgraph G[V S] induced by V S has no isolated vertices. The minimum cardinality of a restrained edge monophonic set of G is the restrained edge monophonic number of G, and is denoted by em r (G). w x y z v u Figure 2.1: G Example 2.1. For the graph G given in Figure 2.1, it is clear that S 1 = {z,w}, S 2 = {z,v} are the minimum monophonic sets of G and so m(g) = 2; S 3 = {z,w,u}, S 4 = {z,v,x} are the minimum edge monophonic sets of G and so em(g) = 3; and S 5 = {z,w,v,u}, S 4 = {z,w,v,x} are the minimum restrained edge monophonic sets of G and so em r (G) = 4. Thus the monophonic number, the edge monophonic number and the restrained edge monophonic number of a graph are all different. Theorem 2.1. Each semi-extreme vertex of a graph G belongs to every restrained edge monophonic set of G. In particular, if the set S of all semi-extreme vertices of G is an restrained edge monophonic set, then S is the unique minimum restrained edge monophonic set of G. Proof. Let S be the set of all semi-extreme vertices of G and let T be any restrained edge monophonic set of G. Suppose that there exists a vertex u S such that u / T. Since (< N(u) >) = N(u) 1, there exists a v N(u) such that deg <N(u)> (v) = N(u) 1. Since T is a restrained edge monophonic set of G, the edge e = uv lies on an x y monophonic path P : x = x 0,x 1,...,x i 1,x i = u,x i+1 = v,...,x n = y with x,y T. Since u / T, it is clear that u is an internal vertex of the path P. Since deg <N(u)> (v) = N(u) 1, we see that v is adjacent to x i 1, which is a contradiction to the fact that P is an x y monophonic path. Hence S is contained in every restrained edge monophonic set of G. Every restrained edge monophonic set is an edge monophonic set and the converse need not be true. For the graph G given in Figure 2.1, S 3 is an edge monophonic set, however it is not a restrained edge monophonic set. Also, every edge monophonic set is a monophonic set and so every restrained edge monophonic set

26 P. TITUS, A.P. SANTHAKUMARAN AND K. GANESAMOORTHY is a monophonic set of a graph G. Since every restrained edge monophonic set of G is an edge monophonic set, by Theorem 2.1, each semi-extreme vertex of a connected graph G belongs to every restrained edge monophonic set of G. Hence for the complete graph K p (p 2), em r (K p ) = p. The next theorem follows from the respective definitions. Theorem 2.2. For any connectedgraph G, 2 m(g) em(g) em r (G) p. If em(g) = p orp 1, then em r (G) = p. The converseneed not be true. Forthe cycle C 4, em(c 4 ) = 2 = p 2 and em r (C 4 ) = 4 = p. Also, since every restrained edge monophonic set of G is an edge monophonic set of G and the complement of each restrained edge monophonic set has cardinality different from 1, we have em r (G) p 1. Thus there is no graph G of order p with em r (G) = p 1. Theorem 2.3. If a graph G of order p has exactly one vertex of degree p 1, then em r (G) = p. Proof. Let G be a graph of order p with exactly one vertex of degree p 1, and let it be u. Since the vertex u is adjacent to all other vertices in G, then any edge uv where v V(G) {u}, is not an internal edge of any monophonic path joining two vertices of G other than u and v. Hence em r (G) = p. Remark 2.1. The converse of the Theorem 2.3 need not be true. For the cycle C 4, all the vertices of C 4 is the unique minimum restrained edge monophonic set of G, but it does not have a vertex of degree p 1 = 3. The following theorem is easy to verify. Theorem 2.4. (i) If T is a tree with k end vertices, then { p if T is a star em r (T) = k ift is not a star. (ii) For the cycle C p (p 3), em r (C p ) = { p for p < 6 2 for p 6. (iii) For the wheel W p = K 1 +C p 1 (p 5), em r (W p ) = p. (iv) For the complete bipartite graph K m,n (m,n 2), em r (K m,n ) = m+n. (v) For the hyper cube Q n, em r (Q n ) = 2. Theorem 2.5. Let G be a connected graph with every vertex of G is either a cut vertex or an extreme vertex. Then em r (G) = p if and only if G = K 1 + m j K j. Proof. Let G = K 1 + m j K j. Then G has at most one cut vertex. Suppose that G has no cut vertex. Then G = K p and hence em r (G) = p. Suppose that G has exactly one cut vertex. Then all the remaining vertices are extreme vertices and hence em r (G) = p. Conversely, suppose that em r (G) = p. If p = 2, then G = K 2 = K 1 + K 1. If p 3, there exists a vertex x, which is not a cut vertex of G. If G has two or more cut vertices, then the induced subgraph of the cut vertices is a non-trivial path.

THE RESTRAINED EDGE MONOPHONIC NUMBER OF A GRAPH 27 Then the set of all extreme vertices is the minimum restrained edge monophonic set of G and so em r (G) p 2, which is a contradiction. Thus, the number of cut vertices k of G is at most one. Case 1. If k = 0, then the graph G is a block. If p = 3, then G = K 3 = K 1 + K 2. If p 4, we claim that G is complete. Suppose G is not complete. Then there exist two vertices x and y in G such that d(x,y) 2. By Theorem 1.1, both x and y lie on a common cycle and hence x and y lie on a smallest cycle C : x,x 1,...,y,...,x n,x of length at least 4. Thus every vertex of C on G is neither a cut vertex nor an extreme vertex, which is a contradiction to the assumption. Hence G is the complete graph K p and so G = K 1 +K p 1. Case 2. If k = 1, let x be the cut vertex of G. If p = 3, then G = P 3 = K 1 + m j K 1, where m j = 2. If p 4, we claim that G = K 1 + m j K j, where mj 2. It is enough to prove that every block of G is complete. Suppose there exists a block B, which is not complete. Let u and v be two vertices in B such that d(u,v) 2. Then by Theorem 1.1, both u and v lie on a common cycle and hence u and v lie on a smallest cycle of length at least 4. Hence every vertex of C on G is neither a cut vertex nor an extreme vertex, which is a contradiction. Thus every block of G is complete so that G = K 1 + m j K j, where K 1 is the vertex x and mj 2. A caterpillar is a tree for which the removal of all the end vertices gives a path. Theorem 2.6. For every non-trivial tree T with diameter d 3, em r (T) = p d+1 if and only if T is a caterpillar. Proof. Let T be any non-trivial tree with diameter d 3. Let P : u = v 0,v 1,...,v d = v be a diametral path. Let k be the number of end vertices of T and let l be the number of internal vertices of T other than v 1,v 2,...,v d 1. Then d 1+l+k = p. By Theorem 2.4(i), em r (T) = k and so em r (T) = p d l+1. Hence em r (T) = p d+1 if and only if l = 0, if and only if all the internal vertices of T lie on the diametral path P, if and only if T is a caterpillar. The next theorem gives a realization result of the monophonic number, the edge monophonic number and the restrained edge monophonic number. Theorem 2.7. For any integers a,b and c with 3 a b < c, then there exists a connected graph G such that m(g) = a, em(g) = b and em r (G) = c. Proof. Case 1. 3 a = b < c. Let K 2,c a+2 be the complete bipartite graph with bipartite sets X = {x 1,x 2 } and Y = {y 1,y 2,...,y c a+2 } and let P 3 : u 1,u 2,u 3 be a path of order 3. Let H be the graph obtained from K 2,c a+2 and P 3 by identifying the vertex x 2 in K 2,c a+2 with the vertex u 1 in P 3. Add a 2 new vertices v 1,v 2,...,v a 2 to H and join each vertex v i (1 i a 2) with the vertex u 3. The graph G is shown in Figure 2.2.

28 P. TITUS, A.P. SANTHAKUMARAN AND K. GANESAMOORTHY x 1 x 2 u 2 u 3 v 1 v 2 y 1 y 2 y c a+2 Figure 2.2: G v a 2 Let S = {v 1,v 2,,...,v a 2 } be the set of all extreme vertices of G. By Theorems 1.2 and 2.1, S is a subset of every monophonic set, edge monophonic set and restrained edge monophonic set of G. It is clear that S 1 = S {x 1,x 2 } is both the unique minimum monophonic set and unique minimum edge monophonic set of G and so m(g) = em(g) = a. Also, S 2 = S {y 1,y 2,...,y c a+2 } is a minimum restrained edge monophonic set of G and so em r (G) = c. Case 2. a+1 = b < c. Let C 5 : v 1,v 2,v 3,v 4,v 5,v 1 be a cycle of order 5. Let G be the graph obtained from C 5 by adding c b +a 1 new vertices u 1,u 2,...,u a 1,w 1,w 2,...,w c b and joining each u i (1 i a 1) to the vertex v 1 ; joining each w i (1 i c b) to both the vertices v 3,v 5 ; and joining the vertices v 2 and v 5. The graph G is shown in Figure 2.3. w c b w 2 w 1 v 4 v 5 u 1 v 1 u 2 v 3 v 2 Figure 2.3: G u a 1 Let S = {u 1,u 2,,...,u a 1 } be the set of all extreme vertices ofg. By Theorems 1.2 and 2.1, S is a subset of every monophonic set, edge monophonic set and restrained edge monophonic set of G. It is clear that S is not a monophonic set of G and so m(g) > a. It is clear that S 1 = S {v 3 } is a monophonic set of G and so m(g) = a. Also, since the edge v 2 v 5 does not lie on any x y monophonic path for some vertices x,y S 1, we have S 1 is not an edge monophonic set of G and so em r (G) > b. Let S 2 = S 1 {v 5 }. Clearly, S 2 is an edge monophonic set of G and so em(g) = S 2 = a+1. Also, it is clear that S 3 = S {v 2,v 4,w 1,w 2,...,w c b } is a minimum restrained edge monophonic set of G and so em r (G) = c.

THE RESTRAINED EDGE MONOPHONIC NUMBER OF A GRAPH 29 Case 3. a+2 b < c. Let P 2 : x,y be a path of order 2 and let P b a+1 : u 1,u 2,,...,u b a+1 be a path of order b a + 1. Let H be the graph obtained from P 2 and P b a+1 by joining the vertices u i (1 i b a+1) with y and also joining the vertices x and u b a+1. Let G be the graph obtained from H by adding c b+a 1 new vertices v 1,v 2,...,v a 1,w 1,w 2,...,w c b and joining each v i (1 i a 1) to the vertex x and joining each w i (1 i c b) with the vertices u 1 and u b a+1. The graph G is shown in Figure 2.4. v 1 v 2 v a 1 x y u 1 u 2 w 1 w 2 w c b Figure 2.4: G u b a+1 Let S = {v 1,v 2,,...,v a 1 } be the set of all extreme vertices of G. By Theorems 1.2 and 2.1, every monophonic set, edge monophonic set and restrained edge monophonic set contains S. Clearly, S is not a monophonic set of G and so m(g) > a. It is clear that S 1 = S {u 1 } is a monophonic set of G and so m(g) = a. Let S 2 = S {u 2,u 3,...,u b a } be the set of all semi-extreme vertices of G. By Theorem 2.1, S 2 is a subset of every edge monophonic set of G. Since the edge yu b a+1 does not lie on any x y monophonic path for some vertices x,y S 2, we have S 2 is not an edge monophonic set of G and so emg) > b 2. It is clear that S 3 = S 2 {u 1,u b a+1 } is an edge monophonic set of G and so em(g) = b. Also, it is clear that S 4 = S 3 {w 1,w 2,...,w c b } is a minimum restrained edge monophonic set of G, we have em r (G) = c. References [1] F. Buckley and F. Harary. Distance in Graphs. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1990. [2] F. Buckley, F. Harary, and L. V. Quintas. Extremal Results on the Geodetic Number of a Graph. Scientia A2 (1988), 17-26. [3] G. Chartrand, F. Harary, and P. Zhang. On the Geodetic Number of a Graph, Networks., 39(1)(2002), 1-6. [4] G. Chartrand, G.L. Johns, and P. Zhang, On the Detour Number and Geodetic Number of a Graph, Ars Combinatoria, 72(2004), 3-15. [5] F. Harary, Graph Theory, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1969. [6] F. Harary, E. Loukakis and C. Tsouros. The Geodetic Number of a Graph, Math. Comput. Modeling, 17(11)(1993), 87-95. [7] P.A. Ostrand. Graphs with specified radius and diameter, Discrete Math., 4(1)(1973), 71-75.

30 P. TITUS, A.P. SANTHAKUMARAN AND K. GANESAMOORTHY [8] A. P. Santhakumaran amd J.John. Edge Geodetic Number of a Graph. Journal Discrete Mathematics and Cryptography, 10(3)(2007), 415-432. [9] A.P. Santhakumaran, P. Titus and K. Ganesamoorthy. On the Monophonic Number of a Graph. J. Appl. Math. & Informatics, 32(1-2)(2014), 255-266. [10] A. P. Santhakumaran, M. Mahendran and P. Titus. The Restrained Edge Geodetic Number of a Graph. International Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 11(1)92016), 9-19. [11] A. P. Santhakumaran, P. Titus and K. Ganesamoorthy. The Restrained Monophonic Number of a Graph, Communicated. Received by editors 15.02.2016; Revised version 01.09.2016; Available online 05.09.2016. 1 Department of Mathematics, University College of Engineering Nagercoil, Anna University, Tirunelveli Region, Nagercoil - 629 004, India E-mail address: titusvino@yahoo.com 2 Department of Mathematics, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, Chennai - 603 103, India E-mail address: apskumar1953@gmail.com 3 Department of Mathematics, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, (Government Aided Autonomous Institution), Coimbatore - 641 014, India E-mail address: kvgm 2005@yahoo.co.in