Category: Standards Track November Registration of Charset and Languages Media Features Tags. Status of this Memo

Similar documents
Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track September MIME Content Types in Media Feature Expressions

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track January 1999 Updates: 2284, 1994, PPP LCP Internationalization Configuration Option

Category: Standards Track January 1999

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. A. Mutz Jutvision Corporation K. Holtman TUE March 1999

Category: Informational March Portable Font Resource (PFR) - application/font-tdpfr MIME Sub-type Registration

Category: Standards Track August 2002

Request for Comments: Columbia U. November 2000

Category: Informational November 2000

Request for Comments: 3206 Category: Standards Track February 2002

Network Working Group Request for Comments: IBM L. Masinter AT&T December 1999

Request for Comments: 3401 Updates: 2276 October 2002 Obsoletes: 2915, 2168 Category: Informational

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Best Current Practice January IANA Charset Registration Procedures

J. Zawinski Netscape Communications July 1998

Request for Comments: 2277 BCP: 18 January 1998 Category: Best Current Practice. IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages. Status of this Memo

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Netscape Communications Corp. May 1999

Category: Standards Track September 2003

Request for Comments: 2711 Category: Standards Track BBN October 1999

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track April 2001

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track February SIEVE Filtering: Spamtest and VirusTest Extensions

Network Working Group. Cisco Systems Inc. October 2000

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Best Current Practice January 2004

Request for Comments: February Mobile IP Vendor/Organization-Specific Extensions

Category: Standards Track December 2003

Request for Comments: 3405 BCP: 65 October 2002 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3508 Category: Informational April H.323 Uniform Resource Locator (URL) Scheme Registration

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 2318 Category: Informational W3C March 1998

Updates: 2409 May 2005 Category: Standards Track. Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1)

Network Working Group. November 1999

Network Working Group. Obsoletes: draft-ietf-dhc-new-opt-msg-00.txt June 2000 Expires December 2000

Category: Standards Track Human Communications S. Zilles Adobe Systems, Inc. March 1998

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track September Telnet Encryption: DES3 64 bit Cipher Feedback

Obsoletes: 2070, 1980, 1942, 1867, 1866 Category: Informational June 2000

Request for Comments: 3007 Updates: 2535, 2136 November 2000 Obsoletes: 2137 Category: Standards Track. Secure Domain Name System (DNS) Dynamic Update

Updates: 2710 September 2003 Category: Standards Track. Source Address Selection for the Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Protocol

Request for Comments: 2771 Category: Informational February An Abstract API for Multicast Address Allocation

Request for Comments: 3191 Obsoletes: 2303 October 2001 Updates: 2846 Category: Standards Track. Minimal GSTN address format in Internet Mail

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3397 Category: Standards Track Apple Computer, Inc. November 2002

EPFL S. Willmott UPC September 2003

Request for Comments: 2536 Category: Standards Track March DSA KEYs and SIGs in the Domain Name System (DNS)

Category: Best Current Practice March 2000

Network Working Group. November Encoding Long Options in the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4)

Network Working Group. Category: Informational September 2000

Network Working Group Request for Comments: January IP Payload Compression Using ITU-T V.44 Packet Method

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 2921 Category: Informational September 2000

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Experimental J. Postel ISI December 1998

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems. D. Katz Juniper Networks Y. Rekhter. Cisco Systems. February 1998

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3563 Category: Informational July 2003

Network Working Group. Ohio University C. Metz The Inner Net September 1998

Request for Comments: 2976 Category: Standards Track October 2000

Request for Comments: 3172 BCP: 52 September 2001 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track A. B. Roach dynamicsoft June 2002

Request for Comments: 3306 Category: Standards Track Microsoft August 2002

Request for Comments: 4393 Category: Standards Track March MIME Type Registrations for 3GPP2 Multimedia Files

Request for Comments: 3548 July 2003 Category: Informational

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 2671 Category: Standards Track August 1999

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track NIST November 1998

Request for Comments: 3192 Obsoletes: 2304 October 2001 Updates: 2846 Category: Standards Track

Category: Informational 1 April 2001

November VeriSign Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 2.0.0

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3137 Category: Informational Cisco Systems A. Zinin Nexsi Systems D. McPherson Amber Networks June 2001

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track March 2001

Category: Informational July Generic Routing Encapsulation over CLNS Networks

Category: Standards Track August 2002

Use and Interpretation of HTTP Version Numbers

Category: Standards Track August POP URL Scheme. Status of this Memo

Request for Comments: 3861 Category: Standards Track August 2004

Network Working Group Request for Comments: October Ethernet Automatic Protection Switching (EAPS) Version 1

Network Working Group. February Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) - Application/dicom MIME Sub-type Registration

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4424 February 2006 Updates: 4348 Category: Standards Track

Request for Comments: 3110 Obsoletes: 2537 May 2001 Category: Standards Track. RSA/SHA-1 SIGs and RSA KEYs in the Domain Name System (DNS)

Updates: 2535 November 2003 Category: Standards Track

Category: Standards Track October Session Description Protocol (SDP) Simple Capability Declaration

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3634 Category: Standards Track Comcast Cable J. Bevilacqua N. Davoust YAS Corporation December 2003

Network Working Group Request for Comments: December 1998

October 4, 2000 Expires in six months. SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over TLS. Status of this Memo

Request for Comments: TIS Labs March Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)

Request for Comments: 2712 Category: Standards Track CyberSafe Corporation October 1999

Network Working Group. Sun Microsystems October 2001

Category: Standards Track December 1998

September Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.

Network Working Group. Category: Informational Cisco Systems J. Brezak Microsoft February 2002

Maxware, Pirsenteret D. Zigmond WebTV Networks, Inc. R. Petke UUNET Technologies November 1999

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track. R. Hinden Nokia August 1999

RFC 3173 IP Payload Compression Protocol September 2001

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 2342 Category: Standards Track Innosoft May 1998

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track December 2001

Category: Standards Track June Requesting Attributes by Object Class in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Status of This Memo

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3363 Updates: 2673, T. Hain Editors August 2002

National Computerization Agency Category: Informational July 2004

Request for Comments: 2537 Category: Standards Track March RSA/MD5 KEYs and SIGs in the Domain Name System (DNS)

Network Working Group. Updates: 1894 June 2000 Category: Standards Track

Request for Comments: October Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 1394 Networks

See Also: 1201 January 1999 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track <draft-aboba-radius-iana-03.txt> 30 March 2003 Updates: RFC IANA Considerations for RADIUS

Network Working Group. Updates: 1858 June 2001 Category: Informational. Protection Against a Variant of the Tiny Fragment Attack

Network Working Group. A. Keromytis U. of Pennsylvania March DSA and RSA Key and Signature Encoding for the KeyNote Trust Management System

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track ivmg V. Paxson ACIRI/ICSI E. Crabbe Exodus Communications June 2000

Network Working Group. Category: Informational January Unused Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Option Codes

Category: Standards Track June 2006

Transcription:

Network Working Group P. Hoffman Request for Comments: 2987 Internet Mail Consortium Category: Standards Track November 2000 Registration of Charset and Languages Media Features Tags Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document contains the registration for two media feature tags: "charset" and "language". These media features allow specification of character sets and human languages that can be understood by devices and the devices users. The templates in this document are derived from RFC 2506. 1. Registration for charset To: media-feature-tags@apps.ietf.org (Media feature tags mailing list) Subject: Registration of media feature tag charset Media feature tag name: charset ASN.1 identifier associated with feature tag: 1.3.6.1.8.1.31 Summary of the media feature indicated by this feature tag: Ability to display particular charsets as defined in [CHARSET]. For most devices, this media feature is usually a capability; that is, most devices cannot intelligently process text in a charset that is unknown to the device. Hoffman Standards Track [Page 1]

Values appropriate for use with this feature tag: The values are tokens as defined in [CHARSET]. The values can only be compared for equality. Comparison is not case sensitive. The feature tag is intended primarily for use in the following applications, protocols, services, or negotiation mechanisms: Any protocol that uses media tags Examples of typical use: ( (charset=utf-8);q=1.0 (charset=iso-8859-1);q=0.9 (charset=utf-16);q=0.5 ) Related standards or documents: "IANA Charset Registration Procedures", RFC 2978 Considerations particular to use in individual applications, protocols, services, or negotiation mechanisms: Interoperability considerations: Aliases for charsets should not be used in media feature expressions because feature expression manipulation tools may convert aliases to the the principal name for the charset. Even though charset names are not case-sensitive, values should be expressed as all lowercase letters to increase the likelihood of interoperability. The "charset" capability should always be indicated in conjunction with any capability to handle textual data. Security considerations: If it is known that there is a security bug in the display of a particular charset in a particular environment, knowing that a device can accept that charset may slightly help an attacker. Additional information: Name(s) & email address(es) of person(s) to contact for further information: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org> Intended usage: COMMON Author/Change controller: IETF Hoffman Standards Track [Page 2]

Requested IANA publication delay: Other information: 2. Registration for language To: media-feature-tags@apps.ietf.org (Media feature tags mailing list) Subject: Registration of media feature tag language Media feature tag name: language ASN.1 identifier associated with feature tag: 1.3.6.1.8.1.32 Summary of the media feature indicated by this feature tag: Ability to display particular human languages as defined in [LANG]. Note that "display" in this case will most often mean speech by a computer. For most devices, this media feature is a preference, not a requirement. Values appropriate for use with this feature tag: The values are tokens, with allowable values defined by registration as defined in [LANG]. The values can only be compared for equality. As described in [LANG], language tags are always handled as a single token, and "subtags" are not used for comparison. Comparison is not case sensitive. The feature tag is intended primarily for use in the following applications, protocols, services, or negotiation mechanisms: Any protocol that uses media tags Examples of typical use: ( (language=no-nynorsk);q=1.0 (language=no-bokmaal);q=0.9 (language=i-sami-no);q=0.5 ) Related standards or documents: "Tags for the Identification of Languages", RFC 1766 Considerations particular to use in individual applications, protocols, services, or negotiation mechanisms: Hoffman Standards Track [Page 3]

Interoperability considerations: Even though language tags are not case-sensitive, values should be expressed as all lowercase letters to increase the likelihood of interoperability. Security considerations: If it is known that there is a security bug in the display of a particular language in a particular environment, knowing that a device can accept that language may slightly help an attacker. Additional information: Name(s) & email address(es) of person(s) to contact for further information: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org> Intended usage: COMMON Author/Change controller: IETF Requested IANA publication delay: Other information: 3. Security Considerations The security considerations are listed in the two registrations above. 4. IANA Considerations The bulk of this document is IANA registrations. 5. References [CHARSET] Freed, N. and J. Postel, "IANA Charset Registration Procedures", BCP 19, RFC 2978, October 2000. [LANG] Alvestrand, H., "Tags for the Identification of Languages", RFC 1766, March 1995. [TAG-REG] Holtman, K., Mutz, A. and T. Hardie, "Media Feature Tag Registration Procedure", BCP 31, RFC 2506, March 1999. Hoffman Standards Track [Page 4]

6. Author s Address Paul Hoffman Internet Mail Consortium 127 Segre Place Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA EMail: phoffman@imc.org Hoffman Standards Track [Page 5]

7. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. Hoffman Standards Track [Page 6]