Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option

Similar documents
Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track August Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option

Expires: October 9, 2005 April 7, 2005

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. March 2005

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4242 Category: Standards Track University of Southampton B. Volz Cisco Systems, Inc.

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. December 2005

Request for Comments: 5010 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. September 2007

Category: Standards Track October Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)

Network Working Group. February 2005

Category: Standards Track Cisco H. Tschofenig Nokia Siemens Networks August 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Samsung S. Kumar Tech Mahindra Ltd S. Madanapalli Samsung May 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: February 2006

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Category: Standards Track December 2003

Network Working Group. Category: Informational UNINETT A. Vijayabhaskar Cisco Systems (India) Private Limited May 2005

Category: Standards Track December 2007

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc January The Secure Shell (SSH) Session Channel Break Extension

Category: Standards Track June 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: August Address-Prefix-Based Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4

Request for Comments: May 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. June 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Informational May OSPF Database Exchange Summary List Optimization

Category: Standards Track June Requesting Attributes by Object Class in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Status of This Memo

Request for Comments: 5179 Category: Standards Track May 2008

C. Martin ipath Services February A Policy Control Mechanism in IS-IS Using Administrative Tags

Category: Standards Track September MIB Textual Conventions for Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4424 February 2006 Updates: 4348 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group. Category: Informational January Unused Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Option Codes

Network Working Group Request for Comments: December IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6

Network Working Group. N. Williams Sun Microsystems June 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4573 Category: Standard Track July MIME Type Registration for RTP Payload Format for H.

Category: Standards Track B. Volz S. Zeng Cisco Systems, Inc. September 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4143 Category: Standards Track Brandenburg November 2005

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks August 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Informational January 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4603 Category: Informational Cisco Systems July Additional Values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems May 2007

Request for Comments: K. Norrman Ericsson June 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4869 Category: Informational May Suite B Cryptographic Suites for IPsec. Status of This Memo

Request for Comments: 3934 Updates: 2418 October 2004 BCP: 94 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group. BCP: 131 July 2007 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March 2007

Request for Comments: 4680 Updates: 4346 September 2006 Category: Standards Track

Request for Comments: 4759 Category: Standards Track Neustar Inc. L. Conroy Roke Manor Research November 2006

Request for Comments: 4633 Category: Experimental August 2006

Network Working Group. Cisco Systems June 2007

Network Working Group. November Encoding Long Options in the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4)

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June 2005

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4558 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems D. Papadimitriou Alcatel June 2006

Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks E. Rosen Cisco Systems, Inc. August MPLS Upstream Label Assignment and Context-Specific Label Space

Request for Comments: 4571 Category: Standards Track July 2006

Updates: 2409 May 2005 Category: Standards Track. Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1)

Network Working Group. J. Lee Samsung Electronics T. Iwata Nagoya University August 2006

Request for Comments: 5079 Category: Standards Track December Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3634 Category: Standards Track Comcast Cable J. Bevilacqua N. Davoust YAS Corporation December 2003

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track July 2007

vcard Extensions for Instant Messaging (IM)

Request for Comments: 4755 Category: Standards Track December 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. April 2004

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track September 2006

Ericsson D. Willis. Cisco Systems. April 2006

Network Working Group. Intended status: Standards Track Columbia U. Expires: March 5, 2009 September 1, 2008

Request for Comments: 4509 Category: Standards Track May Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)

Request for Comments: 5156 Category: Informational April 2008

Category: Standards Track Redback Networks June 2008

Category: Experimental June 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3397 Category: Standards Track Apple Computer, Inc. November 2002

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4432 March 2006 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group Request for Comments: September IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Options

Network Working Group. M. Duckett T. Anschutz BellSouth J. Moisand Juniper Networks September 2006

Request for Comments: 4255 Category: Standards Track SPARTA January Using DNS to Securely Publish Secure Shell (SSH) Key Fingerprints

Request for Comments: 3861 Category: Standards Track August 2004

Request for Comments: Starent Networks A. Lior Bridgewater Systems K. Leung Cisco Systems October 2007

Network Working Group. Category: Informational June Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions for Traffic Engineering (TE)

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Best Current Practice January 2004

February T11 Network Address Authority (NAA) Naming Format for iscsi Node Names

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March OSPF Out-of-Band Link State Database (LSDB) Resynchronization

Network Working Group. Updates: 3463, 4468, 4954 June 2008 Category: Best Current Practice. A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes

Network Working Group. Category: Informational October 2005

Category: Informational September 2004

September The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) tel Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry. Status of This Memo

Network Working Group Internet-Draft January 25, 2006 Expires: July 29, Feed Rank draft-snell-atompub-feed-index-05.txt. Status of this Memo

Jabber, Inc. August 20, 2004

Network Working Group. Category: Informational April A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)

Request for Comments: 4142 Category: Standards Track Nine by Nine November 2005

Category: Informational September A Suggested Scheme for DNS Resolution of Networks and Gateways

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4147 Category: Informational August Proposed Changes to the Format of the IANA IPv6 Registry

Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-00.

Category: Informational Woven Systems May 2008

Request for Comments: 5208 Category: Informational May 2008

Isode Limited March 2008

Category: Experimental April BinaryTime: An Alternate Format for Representing Date and Time in ASN.1

Request for Comments: 4433 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems Inc. March 2006

Category: Best Current Practice February Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Category: Standards Track March Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport Over TCP

Request for Comments: 4715 Category: Informational NTT November 2006

Request for Comments: NTT Communications A. Takenouchi NTT December A Model of IPv6/IPv4 Dual Stack Internet Access Service

Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track January 2008

Request for Comments: 4393 Category: Standards Track March MIME Type Registrations for 3GPP2 Multimedia Files

Category: Standards Track Microsoft May 2004

Transcription:

Network Working Group B. Volz Request for Comments: 4580 Cisco Systems, Inc. Category: Standards Track June 2006 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option Status of This Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). Abstract This memo defines a new Relay Agent Subscriber-ID option for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6). The option allows a DHCPv6 relay agent to associate a stable "Subscriber-ID" with DHCPv6 client messages in a way that is independent of the client and of the underlying physical network infrastructure. Table of Contents 1. Introduction...2 2. The Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option...2 3. DHCPv6 Relay Agent Behavior...3 4. DHCPv6 Server Behavior...3 5. Security Considerations...4 6. IANA Considerations...4 7. Acknowledgements...4 8. References...4 8.1. Normative References...4 8.2. Informative References...4 Volz Standards Track [Page 1]

1. Introduction DHCPv6 [1] provides IP addresses and configuration information for IPv6 clients. It includes a relay agent capability, in which processes within the network infrastructure receive multicast messages from clients and relay them to DHCPv6 servers. In some network environments, it will be useful for the relay agent to add information to the DHCPv6 message before relaying it. The information that relay agents supply can also be used in the server s decision-making about the addresses, delegated prefixes [2], and configuration parameters that the client is to receive. In many service-provider environments, it is believed to be desirable to associate some provider-specific information with clients DHCPv6 messages that is independent of the physical network configuration and that the relay agent has learned through some means that is outside the scope of this memo. 2. The Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option In complex service provider environments, there is a need to connect a customer s DHCPv6 configuration with the customer s administrative information. The Relay Agent Subscriber-ID option carries a value that can be independent of the physical network configuration through which the subscriber is connected. This value complements, and might well be used in addition to, the network-based information. The "subscriber-id" assigned by the provider is intended to be stable as customers connect through different paths, and as network changes occur. The subscriber-id information allows the service provider to assign/ activate subscriber-specific actions; e.g., assignment of specific IP addresses, prefixes, DNS configuration, trigger accounting, etc. This option is de-coupled from the access network s physical structure, so a subscriber that moves from one access-point to another, for example, would not require reconfiguration at the service provider s DHCPv6 servers. The subscriber-id information is only intended for use within a single administrative domain and is only exchanged between the relay agents and DHCPv6 servers within that domain. Therefore, the format and encoding of the data in the option is not standardized, and this specification does not establish any semantic requirements on the data. This specification only defines the option for conveying this information from relay agents to DHCPv6 servers. Volz Standards Track [Page 2]

However, as the DHCPv4 Subscriber-ID suboption [3] specifies Network Virtual Terminal (NVT) American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) [4] encoded data, in environments where both DHCPv4 [5] and DHCPv6 are being used, it may be beneficial to use that encoding. The format of the DHCPv6 Relay Agent Subscriber-ID option is shown below: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ OPTION_SUBSCRIBER_ID option-len +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+... subscriber-id... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ option-code OPTION_SUBSCRIBER_ID (38) option-len subscriber-id length, in octets, of the subscriber-id field. The minimum length is 1 octet. The subscriber s identity. 3. DHCPv6 Relay Agent Behavior DHCPv6 relay agents may be configured to include a Subscriber-ID option in relayed (RELAY-FORW) DHCPv6 messages. How the subscriberid is assigned and the mechanisms used to configure it are outside the scope of this memo. 4. DHCPv6 Server Behavior This option provides additional information to the DHCPv6 server. The DHCPv6 server may use this information, if available, in addition to other relay agent option data, other options included in the DHCPv6 client messages, and physical network topology information in order to assign IP addresses, delegate prefixes, and/or other configuration parameters to the client. There is no special additional processing for this option. There is no requirement that a server return this option and its data in a RELAY-REPLY message. Volz Standards Track [Page 3]

5. Security Considerations As the subscriber-id option is only exchanged between relay agents and DHCPv6 servers, [1], Section 21.1, provides details on securing DHCPv6 messages sent between servers and relay agents. [1], Section 23, provides general DHCPv6 security considerations. 6. IANA Considerations IANA has assigned a DHCPv6 option code (38) for the Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option. 7. Acknowledgements Thanks to Richard Johnson, Theyn Palaniappan, and Mark Stapp as this document is essentially an edited version of their memo [3]. 8. References 8.1. Normative References [1] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003. 8.2. Informative References [2] Troan, O. and R. Droms, "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6", RFC 3633, December 2003. [3] Johnson, R., Palaniappan, T., and M. Stapp, "Subscriber-ID Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option", RFC 3993, March 2005. [4] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol Specification", STD 8, RFC 854, May 1983. [5] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC 2131, March 1997. Volz Standards Track [Page 4]

Author s Address Bernard Volz Cisco Systems, Inc. 1414 Massachusetts Ave. Boxborough, MA 01719 USA Phone: +1 978 936 0382 EMail: volz@cisco.com Volz Standards Track [Page 5]

Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA). Volz Standards Track [Page 6]