SeaFEM - Validation Case 10

Similar documents
SeaFEM - Validation Case 11

Floating Cylinder. SeaFEM - Validation Case 4

Wigley Hull. SeaFEM - Validation Case 2

Development of the Compliant Mooring Line Model for FLOW-3D

SEAKEEPING STUDY OF TWO OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE PLATFORMS

Comparison of open-source code Nemoh with Wamit for cargo ship motions in shallow water

A Verification Study of ABAQUS AC3D8R Elements for Acoustic Wave Propagation

Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, 1995 WIT Press, ISSN X

6.2 Volumes by Disks, Washers, and Cross-Sections

Section Parametrized Surfaces and Surface Integrals. (I) Parametrizing Surfaces (II) Surface Area (III) Scalar Surface Integrals

A Review of the Implicit Motion Solver Algorithm in OpenFOAM to Simulate a Heaving Buoy

QUIZ 4 (CHAPTER 17) SOLUTIONS MATH 252 FALL 2008 KUNIYUKI SCORED OUT OF 125 POINTS MULTIPLIED BY % POSSIBLE

Calibration and validation of a spar-type floating offshore wind turbine model using the FAST dynamic simulation tool

MA 243 Calculus III Fall Assignment 1. Reading assignments are found in James Stewart s Calculus (Early Transcendentals)

Optimal design of floating platform and substructure for a spar type wind turbine system

Training on OrcaFlex Software

Numerical Simulation of Floating Pontoon Breakwater with ANSYS AQWA Software and Validation of the Results with Laboratory Data

Numerical Estimation and Validation of Shallow Draft Effect on Roll Damping

A METHOD OF APPLYING LINEAR SEAKEEPING PANEL PRESSURE TO FULL SHIP STRUCTURAL MODELS

ESD.77 Multidisciplinary System Design Optimization Spring Barge Design Optimization

COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE MEASUREMENTS WITH CALCULATED MOTION CHARACTERISTICS OF A WEST OF AFRICA FPSO

Math 11 Fall 2016 Section 1 Monday, October 17, 2016

Name: Class: Date: 1. Use Lagrange multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values of the function subject to the given constraint.

Thompson/Ocean 420/Winter 2005 Internal Gravity Waves 1

Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14) 30-31,December, 2014, Ernakulam, India

Screening of Available Tools for Dynamic Mooring Analysis of Wave Energy Converters Thomsen, Jonas Bjerg; Ferri, Francesco; Kofoed, Jens Peter

AQWA User Manual. 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA (T) (F)

VALIDATION METHODOLOGY FOR SIMULATION SOFTWARE OF SHIP BEHAVIOUR IN EXTREME SEAS

Code_Aster. SSNV209 Interface in contact rubbing with X-FEM

DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION OF THE WEC- SIM WAVE ENERGY CONVERTER SIMULATION TOOL

6.6 Cables: Uniform Loads

Numerical Validation and Analysis of the Semi-submersible Platform of the DeepCwind Floating Wind Turbine based on CFD

NUMERICAL STUDY OF TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF SEMI-SUBMERSIBLE PLATFORMS WITH MOORING SYSTEMS IN THE SEA

Non-linear force-displacement performance Luca Martinelli Barbara Zanuttigh Elisa Angelelli

SESAM USER MANUAL WADAM. Wave Analysis by Diffraction and Morison theory. Valid from program version 9.3 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

Experimental Validation of the Computation Method for Strongly Nonlinear Wave-Body Interactions

Investigation of Wave-Structure Interaction Using State of the Art CFD Techniques

Fluid Structure Interaction Analysis of Planar Buoy Muhammad Adnan Hanif Rajev Kumar Oad Rakeshbhai Patel

Simulating Sinkage & Trim for Planing Boat Hulls. A Fluent Dynamic Mesh 6DOF Tutorial

Scattering/Wave Terminology A few terms show up throughout the discussion of electron microscopy:

Express Introductory Training in ANSYS Fluent Workshop 07 Tank Flushing

Analysis of a Cubic Crystal Gravitation Deflector (P) 5

Application of Finite Volume Method for Structural Analysis

Name Class. (a) (b) (c) 2. Find the volume of the solid formed by revolving the region bounded by the graphs of

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces and Motion Characteristics of a Trimaran Light Aboard Ship using Finite Element Method

f xx (x, y) = 6 + 6x f xy (x, y) = 0 f yy (x, y) = y In general, the quantity that we re interested in is

Lesson 6: Assembly Structural Analysis

3. What is the source separation? Express your answer in terms of the wavelength.

INTEGRATION SCHEMES FOR THE TRANSIENT DYNAMICS OF NONLINEAR CABLE STRUCTURES

The Study of Ship Motions in Regular Waves using a Mesh-Free Numerical Method

Report No CPO FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SHUTTLE. Version 2.0

Benchmark on the numerical simulation of a tube bundle vibration under cross flow

Wave Tank to an Offshore Floater Design Tool 18 MARCH 2013

Applications of Triple Integrals

Geophysics 224 B2. Gravity anomalies of some simple shapes. B2.1 Buried sphere

MATH 261 EXAM III PRACTICE PROBLEMS

Tutorial 17. Using the Mixture and Eulerian Multiphase Models

Crane Hook Design and Analysis

LECTURE 3-1 AREA OF A REGION BOUNDED BY CURVES

IMPLEMENTATION OF ANALYTICAL (MATLAB) AND NUMERICAL (HFSS) SOLUTIONS ADVANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY SOHAIB SAADAT AFRIDI HAMMAD BUTT ZUNNURAIN AHMAD

Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.3 Interference

Computational Methods of Scientific Programming Fall 2007

MATH 104 Sample problems for first exam - Fall MATH 104 First Midterm Exam - Fall (d) 256 3

2. Motion Analysis - Sim-Mechanics

WHITEPAPER FLOATOVER ANALYSIS. From modelling to time-domain analysis using Sesam TM SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

Math 2260 Exam #1 Practice Problem Solutions

Bi-directional seismic vibration control of spatial structures using passive mass damper consisting of compliant mechanism

OMAE HYDRODYNAMIC MODELLING COMPETITION - OVERVIEW AND APPROACHES

Workshop 15. Single Pass Rolling of a Thick Plate

WTS TUTORING WTS CALCULUS GRADE : 12 : PROF KWV KHANGELANI SIBIYA : WTS TUTORS CELL NO. : :

The Catenary. Daniel Gent. December 10, 2008

Fully-Coupled Thermo-Mechanical Analysis

Physics I : Oscillations and Waves Prof. S Bharadwaj Department of Physics & Meteorology Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Linear Analysis of an Arch Dam

Lecture 34: Curves defined by Parametric equations

( x 1) 2 + ( y 3) 2 = 25

Assignment 8 Due November 29, Problems

Exam 2 Preparation Math 2080 (Spring 2011) Exam 2: Thursday, May 12.

Applying FEA to a tensile structure (Imperial)

Lab#5 Combined analysis types in ANSYS By C. Daley

Table of contents for: Waves and Mean Flows by Oliver Bühler Cambridge University Press 2009 Monographs on Mechanics. Contents.

Wave-structure interaction of offshore wave energy converters

Animation of Fluids. Animating Fluid is Hard

Numerical analysis of the coupling response of a semi-submersible platform with its mooring system

27. Tangent Planes & Approximations

WEC-Sim Webinar #1. BEMIO and MCR. April 18, Yi-Hsiang Yu and Jennifer van Rij (NREL) Kelley Ruehl (Sandia)

Verification and Validation for Seismic Wave Propagation Problems

Mutltiphysics for Ironcad Demonstration Models (Rev. 1.1)

NUMERICAL DIFFUSION AND DISSIPATION IN HYDROSTATIC MODELS OF INTERNAL WAVES

x + 2 = 0 or Our limits of integration will apparently be a = 2 and b = 4.

2008 International ANSYS Conference

18.02 Final Exam. y = 0

Code_Aster. SDLX400 Girder hinged on elastic support

PARAMETERIZATION AND SAMPLING DESIGN FOR WATER NETWORKS DEMAND CALIBRATION USING THE SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION: APPLICATION TO A REAL NETWORK

Tangent Planes/Critical Points

Global to Local Model Interface for Deepwater Top Tension Risers

Prescribed Deformations

Product Engineering Optimizer

Three-Dimensional Verification Model of Floating Wind Energy Converter Using LS-DYNA3D Code

Transcription:

Buoys joined with an inelastic catenary Version 14.0.0 Compass Ingeniería y Sistemas http://www.compassis.com Tel.: +34 932 181 989 - Fax.: +34 933 969 746 - E: info@compassis.com - C/ Tuset 8, 7o 2a, Barcelona 08006 (Spain)

http://www.compassis.com info@compassis.com June 2017

Table of Contents Chapters Pag. Validation Case 10 - Buoy inelastic catenary 1 Mesh 4 Results 5 Appendix 6 Validation Summary 7 iii

1 Validation Case 10 - Buoy inelastic catenary This validation case analyses the dynamic behavior of two buoys connected by an inelastic catenary. This simple model is aimed to verify some of the mooring capabilities of SeaFEM, in particular the inelastic catenary type of mooring segments. For the sake of validation, we start from an equilibrium configuration consisting of two cylindrical bodies joined by a catenary segment. In order to enforce the equilibrium, both bodies are subjected to external forces that exactly compensate the horizontal component of the catenary force. An additional surge displacement is imposed initially and both bodies are further released causing an oscillation about the equilibrium configuration. The weight of the catenary causes an additional heave displacement that can be also predicted and validated. No wave effects are taken into account. Hence, incident waves do not exist and the diffraction-radiation problem is not solved. Equilibrium configuration of the catenary The assumed equilibrium configuration and problem parameters are shown in the following sketch: xo = 6 m w = 1000 N/m L = 15 m The equation of the inelastic catenary is given by the following expression: z = ( T o w ) cosh ( x w T o ) 1

where To is the horizontal component of the catenary tension force (which is constant along the catenary) and w the effective weight (actual weight minus buoyancy) per unit length of the catenary. On the other hand, the length of a differential element of the catenary is given by: ds = (dx 2 + dz 2 1 ) 2 = ( 1 + dz 1 ) 2 dx dx By differentiation of the catenary equation and further substitution into the previous equation we end up with the following expression. ds = ( 1 + sinh ( x w 1 T o )) 2 dx Integrating between both ends of the catenary we obtain the total length L o. L o = 2 ( T o w ) sinh ( x o w T o ) By solving this transcendental equation, it is possible to evaluate the value of To and consequently the value of the external forces necessary to enforce the equilibrium. In our particular case, it results in: T o = 5073 N The additional heave displacement due to the weight of the catenary chain attached to the bodies can be also evaluated analitically and compared to the numerical results. To this aim, note that such an additional displacement will cause an extra buoyant force which must exactlly compensate half the effective weight (P/2) of the chain (since two bodies are supporting the total length of the catenary). From this, the vertical displacement can be evaluated as: h = P 2 ρ w g A where ρ w is the water density, g is the gravity acceleration and A is the cross section area of the cylinder. In the present simulation, ρ w = 1025 which corresponds to sea water, and A = 3.1416 m 2 (cylinder radius R=1 m). This provides a vertical displacement: 2

h = 0.2374 m Since the initial configuration of the model does not take into account the weight of the catenary, and the masses of the floating bodies are calculated by SeaFEM imposing an initial hydrostatic equilibrium, the numerical simulation will result in a vertical oscillation of the two bodies around the vertical equilibrium position z = -h = -0.2374 m. The following image shows a top view of the computational domain. The two cylinders have identical radius (R=1m) and initial draft (h=0.5 m) resulting in a displacement about 1.57 m 3 and a body mass about 1610 Kg (water density ρ = 1025 Kg/m 3 ). 3

Mesh Mesh properties for the present analysis are summarized in the following table: Mesh properties Min. element size 0.2 Max element size 5 Mesh size transition 0.2 Number of elements 127355 Number of nodes 21845 Next picture shows an isometric view of the whole domain mesh used for the present analysis. 4

Results The following picture shows the surge displacement response of the two floating bodies when they are initially pulled apart 0.1 meters from their equilibrium position: As it was expected, both bodies oscillate in surge with the same phase around the equilibrium position corresponding to null surge. The following picture shows the heave displacement of the two bodies when they are initially located in their free hidrostatic equilibrium position. As it was expected, both bodies oscillate around the equilibrium position given by the additional displacement caused by the weight of the catenary (z = -0.2374 m). The damping observed in the vertical oscillation is simply due to the numerical dissipation of the dynamic solver algorithm). 5

Appendix The following code describes the tcl script used for the present analysis. TdynTcl_InitiateProblem is simply used to deactivate the numerical calculation of the diffraction-radiation problem. On the other hand, TdynTcl_CreateMooring procedure is used to create the catenary line and to link it to the floating bodies. Note that in newer versions of the program mooring lines can be already defined using the graphic user interface of SeaFEM. In this case, the TdynTcl_CreateMooring procedure must be commented in the Tcl script to avoid mooring duplication. On the contrary, TdynTcl_InitiateProblem procedure must remain active within the Tcl script to configure the solver so that the diffraction-radiation problem is not effectively solved. proc TdynTcl_InitiateProblem { } { } configure_analysis Solve_Dif_Rad 0 proc TdynTcl_CreateMooring { } { set area 0.015158 set L 15.0 set w 1000.0 set seg1 2.10E+11 0] [TdynTcl_Create_Mooring_Segment 2-6.0 0.0-0.5 6.0 0.0-0.5 $w $L $area TdynTcl_Create_Mooring_Link $seg1 2 TdynTcl_Message "TdynTcl_CreateMooringLine finished!!!" notice } 6

Validation Summary CompassFEM version 14.0.0 Tdyn solver version 14.0.0.0 RamSeries solver version 14.0.0.0 Benchmark status Successfull Last validation date 09/06/2017 7