CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR SPACE TUG RENDEZVOUS. Statement of Project Fall Author: Timothée de Mierry

Similar documents
CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR SPACE TUG RENDEZVOUS. Project Design Proposal Fall Author: Timothée de Mierry

Automated crash computation of passenger car accidents based on the GIDAS database

Development of Formation Flight and Docking Algorithms Using the SPHERES Testbed

Innovative Test-beds for Validation of Motion Recognition Systems Intended for Orbital Capture Manoeuvres

Project and Diploma Thesis Topics in DAAS

Angles-Only Autonomous Rendezvous Navigation to a Space Resident Object

Navigation for Future Space Exploration Missions Based on Imaging LiDAR Technologies. Alexandre Pollini Amsterdam,

IMPROVING ADAS VALIDATION WITH MBT

COMPARISION OF AERIAL IMAGERY AND SATELLITE IMAGERY FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE PATH PLANNING

Pedestrian Detection with Radar and Computer Vision

Jena-Optronik Relative Navigation Sensor Activities

Small-satellite Launch Services Market, Quarterly Update Q1 2018, Forecast to 2030

H2020 Space Robotic SRC- OG4

DARPA Perspective on Space

Development of a Ground Based Cooperating Spacecraft Testbed for Research and Education

Nicole C. Weber Displaying UAV Imagery in Google Earth 1

Rendezvous sensors and navigation

RPAS for European Border Surveillance

Quantitative Selection and Design of Model Generation Architectures for On-Orbit Autonomous Assembly

Multi-robots Cooperative Assembly Planning of Large Space Truss Structures

Question & Answer #3

A SERVICE ORGANIZATION S GUIDE SOC 1, 2, & 3 REPORTS

Cooperative Conveyance of an Object with Tethers by Two Mobile Robots

Jean-François Goester

NOAA Satellite and Information Service Dan St. Jean, NESDIS Office of Systems Architecture and Advance Planning

Spacial Debris Collector Robot. An AI-based and autonomous debris collector satellite simulation

CelestLabX: CelestLab s extension module

IAA Space Debris Committee. Mark Rawlins, SDA Chairman 21 March 2017

FRACTIONATED SATELLITES

Toward a Flexible and Reconfigurable Broadband Satellite Network: Resource Management Architecture and Strategies

The UN Register on Objects Launched into Outer Space TCBMs and Notification Procedures

> Acoustical feedback in the form of a beep with increasing urgency with decreasing distance to an obstacle

An Update on EDDE. the ElectroDynamic Delivery Express TAI. Fifth International Conference on Tethers in Space Ann Arbor, MI, May 2016

Three-Dimensional Off-Line Path Planning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Using Modified Particle Swarm Optimization

AUTOMATED SECURITY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE ELECTRIC POWER GRID

Application of planar air-bearing microgravity simulator for experiments related to ADR missions

Control Challenges in the Vehicle Infrastructure Initiative (VII)

On-Orbit Testing of Target-less TriDAR 3D Rendezvous and Docking Sensor

AUTONOMOUS UNDERSEA SYSTEMS NETWORK (AUSNET) PROTOCOLS TO SUPPORT AD-HOC AUV COMMUNICATIONS

H2020 Space Robotic SRC- OG4

Alexi Glover & Juha-Pekka Luntama SSA Programme Space Weather Segment, OPS-L ESA/ESAC, Madrid, Spain

THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF AN OPERATOR IN A HUMAN MACHINE SYSTEMS. PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

Cross-Language Interfacing and Gesture Detection with Microsoft Kinect

Networked Cyber-Physical Systems

PROBABILITY OF FAILURE ANALYSIS STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR ELVS

AUV Cruise Path Planning Based on Energy Priority and Current Model

OCSD-A / AeroCube-7A Status Update

COMPUTATION OF CROSS SECTION OF COMPLEX BODIES IN ESA DRAMA TOOL

BIO-MEDICAL BASED PROJECTS

The Study of Integrated Fire/Flight/Propulsion Control (IFFPC) System And Design of Digital Simulation/Design Platform

AUTONOMOUS NAVIGATION: MUNIN UNMANNED VESSEL TEST-BED

DARPA TTO Air and Space Portfolio Update

Re-configurable Ad-hoc Network to Track Points of Interest

Mohammed Bin Rashid Space Centre

DYNAMICS OF SPACE ROBOTIC ARM DURING INTERACTIONS WITH NON COOPERATIVE OBJECTS

Unsupervised Learning and Clustering

National Preparedness System. Update for EMForum June 11, 2014

Location Awareness in Ad Hoc Wireless Mobile Neworks

Applying Model Predictive Control Architecture for Efficient Autonomous Data Collection and Operations on Planetary Missions

JEM Internal Ball Camera (Int-Ball)

OneWeb s Approach to Space Debris Mitigation

Robotics: Science and Systems II

Space Policy of Japan. Mar National Space Policy Secretariat Cabinet Office of Japan

Praktikum: 2. Content of today s lecture. Content of today s lecture. Houxiang Zhang Manfred Grove

MAJOR RESEARCH EQUIPMENT $240,450,000 AND FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION

6 y [m] y [m] x [m] x [m]

RESISTING RELIABILITY DEGRADATION THROUGH PROACTIVE RECONFIGURATION

City of San José PRT Project. Austin Smith

Business Process Design and Internal Audit UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Course Syllabus Spring 2005

ECC Career Fair, Tempe, Spring 2018 Master's & PhD Student Recruiting Day Major UNK 1st Year Sophomore Junior Senior Post-Bach MS/PhD TOTAL

SSA NEO Segment Overview and approach for Phase 2

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Introducing LEGO CHAPTER. Did you get a box that looks like the one shown in Figure 1-1?

COS Lecture 13 Autonomous Robot Navigation

Computer Aided Drafting, Design and Manufacturing Volume 26, Number 4, December 2016, Page 30

Introduction to Robotics using Lego Mindstorms EV3

IEEE Criteria for Standards Development (CSD)

THREE DIMENSIONAL CURVE HALL RECONSTRUCTION USING SEMI-AUTOMATIC UAV

Communications Management Plan Template

Uncertainties in the Products of Ocean-Colour Remote Sensing

Distributed Consensus in Multivehicle Cooperative Control: Theory and Applications

Context Investment decisions should be based on the best available evidence Large capital expenditure both for investment and operation of national in

Interfaces Module Exploration Systems Engineering, version 1.0

Jo-Car2 Autonomous Mode. Path Planning (Cost Matrix Algorithm)

Extending the Growing Neural Gas Classifier for Context Recognition

Pilot Assistive Safe Landing Site Detection System, an Experimentation Using Fuzzy C Mean Clustering

Space Cyber: An Aerospace Perspective

to-end System Test Architecture

LMS Virtual.Lab Correlation

Bet & MathWorks By Bet Herrera Sucarrat Application Engineer MathWorks

The Geostationary Operational Satellite R Series (GOES-R) SpaceWire Implementation

CODE / CONFIGURATION COVERAGE

Indoor Mobile Robot Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance Using a 3D Camera and Laser Scanner

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Inspectorate for Implementation of Innovative Defence Technologies. Inspektorat Implementacji Innowacyjnych Technologii Obronnych (I3TO)

Aman Khan - SID Dr. Karl Hedrick Dr.Samveg Saxena & Alyssa Scheske. May 18, 2015

EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE

Calibration of a rotating multi-beam Lidar

Principles for a National Space Industry Policy

Reconfiguration Methods for On-orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Operations with Application to Space Telescopes. Swati Mohan

STA121: Applied Regression Analysis

Transcription:

CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR SPACE TUG RENDEZVOUS Statement of Project 16.621 Fall 2002 Author: Timothée de Mierry Advisor: Olivier de Weck Partner: Gergana Bounova Thursday, October 3 rd

1. Introduction The Space Tug project is an ongoing MIT/Darpa research project that aims at developing a satellite the Tug to carry out rendezvous and docking with a target satellite. The mission of the Tug will be to capture its target, change its position and orbital elements by a predefined amount and release it without damage to the target satellite or itself. The capabilities of the Tug must include the following: rescue satellites from unusable orbits, orbital debris removal, tactical operations, and other emergent uses. The control system of the Tug used to find and dock with the target is a major aspect of this project. The search for the target satellite is a complex procedure. Although approximate coordinates for its location would be provided, the Tug would still have to search a finite space to find it, since current tracking does not give precision below a magnitude of the order of kilometers. As a result, the Tug has to have intelligent identification and sensing strategies implemented in its control system to approach the target. A major technology risk in the Space Tug project is the target identification and docking. Showing that such a process is feasible would remove this risk and would provide a possible solution to the problem. In addition, given that the control system of the Tug has thus far been modeled as a black box, the results of this research project could give clues as to what the architecture of the control system of the vehicle should be. Furthermore, successful search and rendezvous strategies could be used in other aeronautical applications, such as autonomous and formation flight. Search strategies and algorithms for robots have been studied quite a lot in the past years. As a result, the design part of this project will be influenced by previous work 2

done on search algorithm, notably by the MIT department of electrical engineering and computer science. The basic strategies will be enhanced to fit the purpose of the Space Tug. 2. Hypothesis The use of a semi-autonomous search system with human in the loop is the algorithm that will be the most effective for rendezvous and docking strategies in terms of time and energy consumption. 3. Objectives The project is divided into two distinct parts that will achieve two different but closely related goals. The preliminary objective is to develop, implement, and test three different strategies for two-dimensional, non-cooperative target search and precise docking. This goal is the first step in achieving the primary objective. The primary objective of the experiment is to compare these three strategies based on the trade-off costs between time and energy. The search strategies will be evaluated using predefined criteria, developed into a cost function, to examine the performance of each. 4. Overview of strategies First of all, a model has to be developed in order to simulate the space environment. The position of the Tug in space is defined using four dimensions: three spherical coordinates and time. As a result, assumptions will have to be made in order to build a two-dimensional model that will fit the situation. One possibility is to assume that the Tug will be in the same orbital plane, relative to Earth, as the target. Furthermore, this model will also need to take care of the relative sizes of the Tug, the target and the search area. According to these parameters, the area of the test-bed environment will be chosen 3

to fit the model. The development of the simulation model will be completed by the end of the 16.621 semester. During the second phase of the project, three different search and rendezvous strategies will be developed and implemented, using LEGO? Mindstorms robots. One strategy will be a blind search. The Tug simulator will have no sensors to find the target and will search space until it bumps into the target. The second strategy will be a semiautonomous search with a human in the loop. In this case, the robot s sensor will take data about the searched space and send it to a human controller that will interpret the data to maneuver the robot accordingly. Finally, the third search strategy will be a human-outof-the-loop algorithm where the robot will be completely autonomous. This part of the project will be done during the 16.622 phase. Finally, a test-bed environment will be created for the robots. It will include a non-cooperative, passive target. The different search strategies will be tested in this environment, and the time and energy consumption will be recorded in order to develop the proper cost function. This final step which will take place during the second semester of 16.62X will enable the comparison between the search strategies. 5. Success criteria Linked to the above objectives, this project has two main success criteria. The first criterion is the design and development of the search algorithms in the test-bed environment. The successful implementation of the rendezvous strategies in the vehicle simulating the Tug will provide the necessary data to test the relative effectiveness of each strategy. 4

The second success criterion is the development of a cost function, based on the performance of each search strategy. The trade-off between time and energy has to be represented by the cost function of the form C???time???1????energy?. The relative effectiveness of each strategy will be calculated using this cost function and the results will be compared in order to assess the validity of the hypothesis. 6. Conclusion This project will provide answers to the rendezvous and docking problem that could then be implemented in the broader MIT/Darpa Space Tug project. The results will help to point out potential solutions and algorithms for the control system of the future Tug. Time and energy consumption, as well as the successful implementations of the three searching strategies, will be the focus of the research project. It will provide a first look at the cheapest rendezvous strategy that could potentially be used in the Space Tug project. Ultimately, the goal of this project is to show that the semi-autonomous with a human in the loop search will satisfy this important requirement. 5