DISTANCE BASED CLUSTER FORMATION FOR ENHANCING THE NETWORK LIFE TIME IN MANETS

Similar documents
Performance Evaluation of Various Routing Protocols in MANET

6367(Print), ISSN (Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME & TECHNOLOGY (IJCET)

Energy Efficient EE-DSR Protocol for MANET

Figure 1. Clustering in MANET.

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March ISSN

Simulation and Performance Analysis of Throughput and Delay on Varying Time and Number of Nodes in MANET

Performance Analysis and Enhancement of Routing Protocol in Manet

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF AODV ROUTING PROTOCOL IN MANETS

A Review Paper on Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks

Performance Evaluation of MANET through NS2 Simulation

Efficient Cluster Head Selection Method Based On K-means Algorithm to Maximize Energy of Wireless Sensor Networks

New Data Clustering Algorithm (NDCA)

Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Network

Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy Variance in Wireless Sensor Network (LEACH)

GSM Based Comparative Investigation of Hybrid Routing Protocols in MANETS

Survey on Reliability Control Using CLR Method with Tour Planning Mechanism in WSN

CROSS LAYER PROTOCOL (APTEEN) USING WSN FOR REAL TIME APPLICATION

SUMMERY, CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK

Design and Implementation of a Simulator for Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocol

ENERGY BASED AODV ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR WIRELESS MESH NETWORK

ABSTRACT I. INTRODUCTION. Rashmi Jatain Research Scholar, CSE Department, Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Simulation and Analysis of AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols in Vehicular Adhoc Networks using Random Waypoint Mobility Model

Routing Protocols in MANET: Comparative Study

Energy Conservation through Sleep Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Network 1. Sneha M. Patil, Archana B. Kanwade 2

Optimizing Performance of Routing against Black Hole Attack in MANET using AODV Protocol Prerana A. Chaudhari 1 Vanaraj B.

ENERGY EFFICIENT MULTIPATH ROUTING FOR MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS

Chapter 7 CONCLUSION

A Survey - Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in MANET

Performance Analysis of Wireless Mobile ad Hoc Network with Varying Transmission Power

Fig. 2: Architecture of sensor node

Middle in Forwarding Movement (MFM): An efficient greedy forwarding approach in location aided routing for MANET

A COMPARISON OF REACTIVE ROUTING PROTOCOLS DSR, AODV AND TORA IN MANET

Intra and Inter Cluster Synchronization Scheme for Cluster Based Sensor Network

Hierarchical Routing Algorithm to Improve the Performance of Wireless Sensor Network

Energy Efficiency and Latency Improving In Wireless Sensor Networks

CLUSTER BASED ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS

A Comparative Analysis of Energy Preservation Performance Metric for ERAODV, RAODV, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols in MANET

An Algorithm for Dynamic SDN Controller in Data Centre Networks

A Review Paper on Secure Routing Technique for MANETs

Performance Improvement of Wireless Network Using Modern Simulation Tools

A New Approach for Energy Efficient Routing in MANETs Using Multi Objective Genetic Algorithm

Packet Routing using Optimal Flooding Protocol in Cluster based MANET

Comprehensive Study and Review Various Routing Protocols in MANET

Design and Implementation of a Simulator for Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols

A Survey On: Cluster Based Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Network

A Comparative Analysis of Traffic Flows for AODV and DSDV Protocols in Manet

Efficient Cluster Based Data Collection Using Mobile Data Collector for Wireless Sensor Network

Anil Saini Ph.D. Research Scholar Department of Comp. Sci. & Applns, India. Keywords AODV, CBR, DSDV, DSR, MANETs, PDF, Pause Time, Speed, Throughput.

Effect of Variable Bit Rate Traffic Models on the Energy Consumption in MANET Routing Protocols

Delay Performance of Multi-hop Wireless Sensor Networks With Mobile Sinks

The General Analysis of Proactive Protocols DSDV, FSR and WRP

Content. 1. Introduction. 2. The Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Algorithm. 3. Simulation and Results. 4. Future Work. 5.

CLASSIFICATION OF ROUTING Routing. Fig.1 Types of routing

Comparative Study on Performance Evaluation of Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols Navpreet Chana 1, Navjot Kaur 2, Kuldeep Kumar 3, Someet Singh 4

Performance Analysis of Optimization Techniques for OLSR Routing Protocol for VANET

A Mobile-Sink Based Distributed Energy-Efficient Clustering Algorithm for WSNs

Zone-based Proactive Source Routing Protocol for Ad-hoc Networks

Performance Evaluation of AODV DSDV and OLSR Routing Protocols with Varying FTP Connections in MANET

II. ROUTING CATEGORIES

On the Scalability of Hierarchical Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

Power aware Multi-path Routing Protocol for MANETS

Introduction to Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs)

CLUSTER HEAD SELECTION USING QOS STRATEGY IN WSN

A Literature survey on Improving AODV protocol through cross layer design in MANET

Investigation of the AODV And the SDWCA QoS Handling At Different Utilisation Levels In Adaptive Clustering Environments

Sleep Scheduling Technique for Geographic Routing in MANET

A Test-Bed for Power Consumption Performance Evaluation of AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

Analysis of GPS and Zone Based Vehicular Routing on Urban City Roads

IJREAT International Journal of Research in Engineering & Advanced Technology, Volume 1, Issue 2, April-May, 2013 ISSN:

An Enhanced General Self-Organized Tree-Based Energy- Balance Routing Protocol (EGSTEB) for Wireless Sensor Network

Keywords Mobile Ad hoc Networks, Multi-hop Routing, Infrastructure less, Multicast Routing, Routing.

MODIFIED LEACH-C PROTOCOL FOR CLUSTER BASED ROUTING IN ENERGY EFFICIENT WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS

IJMIE Volume 2, Issue 6 ISSN:

SIMULATION BASED ANALYSIS OF OLSR AND GRP PERFORMANCE IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS

Enhanced Leach for Better Cluster Management Using MAX-HEAP

A Novel Review on Routing Protocols in MANETs

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF TEEN SEP LEACH ERP EAMMH AND PEGASIS ROUTING PROTOCOLS

QoS Routing By Ad-Hoc on Demand Vector Routing Protocol for MANET

EEEM: An Energy-Efficient Emulsion Mechanism for Wireless Sensor Networks

Analysis QoS Parameters for Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols: Under Group Mobility Model

Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad hoc Network based on AODV Protocol

Energy Efficient Clustering Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network

A SURVEY OF VARIOUS ROUTING PROBLEMS TO VARIOUS ATTACKS IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS IN THE TRANSACTIONS

SECURE AND ROBUST ENERGY-EFFICIENT AND RELIABLE ROUTING FOR MULTI HOP NETWORKS USING WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS

A Study on the Behaviour of SAODV with TCP and SCTP Protocols in Mobile Adhoc Networks

Neural Network Model Based Cluster Head Selection for Power Control in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

An Energy Efficient Data Dissemination Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks

Routing Protocols in MANETs

IMPROVEMENT OF LEACH AND ITS VARIANTS IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK

Scalability Performance of AODV, TORA and OLSR with Reference to Variable Network Size

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Improved OLSR Protocol for VANET

Relative Performance Analysis of Reactive (on-demand-driven) Routing Protocols

Energy Consumption for Cluster Based Wireless Routing Protocols in Sensor Networks

Analysis and Comparison of DSDV and NACRP Protocol in Wireless Sensor Network

Throughput Based Analysis of DSR Routing Protocol in MANET

Computation of Multiple Node Disjoint Paths

Literature Survey on Energy Efficient Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks

Comparative Performance of PRO-AODV, DFRR, CPRR algorithm based on Link Failure Route Rectification problem in Mobile Sensor Network

ComparisonofPacketDeliveryforblackholeattackinadhocnetwork. Comparison of Packet Delivery for Black Hole Attack in ad hoc Network

Transcription:

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 DISTANCE BASED CLUSTER FORMATION FOR ENHANCING THE NETWORK LIFE TIME IN MANETS Haftom Gebrehiwet Kidanu 1, Prof. Pallam Setty 2 1PG Scholar, Dept. of Computer Science & Systems Engineering Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India 2Professor, Dept. of Computer Science & Systems Engineering Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Clustering is one of the important methods for extending the network lifetime in Mobile AD Hoc Networks. It involves grouping of nodes into clusters and electing cluster heads for all the clusters. Cluster heads collect the data from their member nodes and forward the collected data to the cluster gateway or cluster head of other cluster. A main challenge in MANET is to select appropriate cluster heads. MANET is self-created and self-organized by a collection of mobile nodes various mobile ad hoc network consists of devices with various characteristics in terms of transmission power, energy, and capacity. The proposed clustering algorithm is first randomly select the clusters heads at a run time then the nodes which are near to cluster head based on their distance are members of that cluster head. The performance analysis of the distance based clustering approach is carried out using NS-2 and MATLAB and analyzed by using the consumed energy, residual energy, and distance graph from each cluster head up to the end of simulation. The simulation shows that the relationship between node distances is directly proportional with the energy consumption in MANET. Key Words: MANET, Clustering, Cluster head, Energy, Distance 1. INTRODUCTION Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET) is basically a peer to peer network, which consist of moveable or mobile nodes interconnected by wireless links. MANET is a selfconfiguring infrastructure less network of mobile devices connected by wireless. These networks can be set up easily anywhere and at any time. Each device in a MANET is free to move independently in any direction. It may frequently link with other devices. Under a cluster structure, mobile nodes may be assigned a different status or function, such as cluster head, cluster gateway or a cluster member. In MANETs the nodes communicate over reliable wireless links within the transmission range of each other. In large MANETs, if two hosts are not within the communication range of each other they communicate if other hosts lying in between are willing to forward packets for them. Therefore every node participates in multi-hop routing to reach all nodes in the network. Flooding is a cause of routing in MANETs which leads to degradation of the efficient use of bandwidth and depletes battery-power of nodes. Hence, many clustering schemes have been proposed where the nodes in a network are divided into clusters. Hierarchical routing is adopted, where a standard proactive or reactive protocol can be used within the cluster but other protocols are used for inter-cluster routing. In the dominating set based clustering schemes routing is done based on a set of dominating nodes (DS). These schemes are quite expensive and not very scalable when the number of nodes in the MANET are large and are moving at high speeds. Topologies in MANET are random, multi-hop and dynamic. Moreover, there is scarcity of link bandwidth and transmission power of mobile nodes. Therefore, MANET faces major challenges concerning routing, scalability and management functions [1] [2]. The basic principle behind ad hoc networking is multi-hop, in which messages are sent from the source to the destination through the nodes. The communication between two ends of nodes is carried out through the number of intermediate nodes whose function is to relay the information from one point to another. In the last few years in multi hop ad hoc networks in which relaying nodes in general mobile, communication needs are primarily between nodes within the same network. It is peer to peer network without any centralized server. MANETs represent complex distributed system. The wireless Cluster structure mobile nodes can freely and dynamically self-organize in ad-hoc network topologies [3]. MANET is basically an organization less network of transportable devices having wireless communication capabilities that can join together at any time and at any place dynamically. In this type of network mobile hosts, sometimes, simultaneously acting as a router, are connected to one another by wireless links and they can easily move randomly hence network topology dynamically change so this makes an autonomous system of mobile nodes having no base station. In MANET each node has limited transmission range so packets are forwarded from any initiating node to any end point node in a network with the help of multiple hopes. 2. RELATED WORKS Bhawnesh Kumar, Vinit Kumar Sharma [4] in this paper, a distance based Cluster head selection algorithm is proposed for improving the sensor network life time. This protocol achieves a good performance in terms of lifetime by 217, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 91:28 Certified Journal Page 844

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 balancing the energy load among all the nodes. This clustering technique help to prolong the life of wireless sensor network, especially in hostile environment where battery replacement of individual sensor nodes is not possible after their deployment in the given target area. Therefore, the proposed technique to distribute the role of the cluster head (CH) among the wireless sensor nodes in the same cluster is vital to increase the lifetime of the network. This algorithm uses a distance based method for providing the cluster head selection. Clustering techniques also provide good load balancing, and in-network data aggregation. Priyanka Chatterjee and Nikhil Agarwal [2] in this thesis, they present a clustering scheme that minimizes message overhead and congestion for cluster formation and maintenance. The algorithm is devised to be independent of the MANET Routing algorithm. Depending upon the context, the clustering algorithm may be implemented in the routing or in higher layers. The dynamic formation of clusters helps reduce data packet overhead, node complexity and power consumption, the simulation has been performed in ns-2. The simulation shows that the number of clusters formed is in proportion with the number of nodes in MANET. A.Mercy Rani, J.Sivaranjani [5] this paper proposed position and distance based clustering approach for offering better connectivity among the network. The proposed clustering algorithm first form the clusters based on the position of the nodes then it will select the Cluster head based on the distance of the nodes. The performance analysis of the proposed position and distance based clustering approach is carried out using NS-2. The performance is analyzed by using the metrics packet delivery ratio, dropped packets and end-to-end delay. 3. CLUSTERING Clustering is one of the important methods for prolonging the network lifetime in Mobile AD Hoc Networks. Clustering scheme is used here where cluster head node will play the role of transmitting packet from one cluster to the other. It involves grouping of nodes into clusters and electing cluster heads for all the clusters. Cluster heads collect the data from particular cluster s nodes and forward the aggregated data to main node. Division of network into different virtual groups, based on certain rules in order to differentiate the nodes allocated to other sub network. In simple words we can say that clustering in MANET is done by virtual partitioning of nodes into sub-networks according to geographical area [1]. Clustering provides a method to build and maintain hierarchical addresses in ad hoc networks. Clustering refers to a technique in which MANET is divided into different virtual group; generally nodes which are geographically adjacent are allocated into the same cluster driven by set of protocols based on behaviors and characteristics of the node. This enables the network to become manageable. Various clustering techniques allow fast connection and also better routing and topology management of MANET [2]. 4. PROPOSED WORK Fig -1: Cluster structure In MANET after creating the cluster head we have to decide the cluster.here we propose an algorithm for selecting cluster head randomly based on the position of the nodes and creating cluster based on distance. 4.1 Proposed Algorithm The following are the steps for each & every cluster. Select Cluster-head (n, C) Begin: Step 1. Number of clusters, C, must be specified Step 2. Pick the 1 st, 1 th and 19 th nodes as cluster-heads randomly based on their position; Step 3. Let we have a set C cluster-heads; C= {C 1, C 2 C m} Step 4. Calculate the distance of all node from all clusters heads using Euclidean distance for i=1 to n do for j=1 to m do endfor d ij= distance from i to C j 217, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 91:28 Certified Journal Page 845

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 endfor Step 5. Distance comparison of each node from each clusterhead 5. SIMULATION RESULTS Randoly deployed nodes from NS-2 if d ij from C j(i) is smaller than d ij from C j..m(i) Step 6. Assign the node i is under its closest Cluster-head of C j(i) based on distance values. Step 7. Calculate the consumption energy of each nodes equation (1) Step 8. Calculate the remaining energy of each node equation (2) Step 9. Making residual energy initial energy of each node s next simulation time. Step 1. Steps 2 to 9 are repeated until the simulation time ends. End Fig -3.1 (a): location of nodes at first simulatiom Fig -2: Cluster formation process Fig -3.2(b): dynamic location of nodes after few seconds of simulation time 217, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 91:28 Certified Journal Page 846

Distance (m)---> Distance (m)---> International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 To calculate the energy residual with using the following formula: Residual energy(i)= E(i) - E Ttx(i) (2) Note E(i)=initial energy and E Ttx(i)=consumed energy 12 Distance from CH1 1 8 6 4 Fig -3.3: Simulation.nam Layout 2 Table -1: Simulation Parameters Parameters Values Number of nodes 3 Simulation Time 3 Area 5*5 m Max Speed 1 Bandwidth 1Mbps Traffic Source FTP Mobility model used Random way point Routing protocol AODV Initial Energy.1 J 5 1 15 2 25 3 Chart -1: CH1 distance bar graph (CH1=cluster head 1, S1=simulation 1, S2=simulation 2, S3=simulation 3) From chart -1 we have seen that the distance of all the 3 nodes from the cluster head 1(the node which is found in the 1 st coordinates) in every running time. The distance of the cluster head from itself is. Always the distance of cluster head 1 at all rounds is that is why it s receiving energy is. 12 1 Distance from CH2 Chart -4 and chart -5 shows energy consumption and residual energy graphs respectively consumption between cluster heads and non-cluster heads To calculate the energy consumption with using the following formula [6]: 8 6 4 E Tx(k,d)=E elec * k + E amp * k * d n (1) Note that, in this thesis work, we let n=2, k=bit(8), E elec=5nj/bit, and E amp=1pj/bit/m 2 After nodes communicating has been finish there will be an energy which is smaller than the initial energy which is residual energy. To calculate the energy residual with using the following formula: 2 5 1 15 2 25 3 Chart -2: CH2 distance bar graph (CH2=cluster head 2, S1=simulation 1, S2=simulation 2, S3=simulation 3) 217, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 91:28 Certified Journal Page 847

Energy (Joul)---> Energy (Joul)---> Distance (m)---> International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 From chart -2 we have seen that the distance of all the 3 nodes from the cluster head 2(the node which is found in the 1 th coordinates) in every running time. The distance of the cluster head from itself is. Always the distance of cluster head 2 at all rounds is that is why it s receiving energy is. 12 Distance from CH3 From chart -4 we have seen that the total consumed energy of all the 3 nodes in every simulation time. The cluster heads are the 1 st, 1 th and 19 th nodes that is why they consume less power than the others because the distance to their own is. Energy consumption is directly proportional to the distance in-between the nodes. Residual energy of each nodes 1 1 x 1-3 Residual Energy 8 9.998 6 9.996 4 9.994 2 9.992 5 1 15 2 25 3 9.99 Chart -3: CH3 distance bar graph (CH3=cluster head 3, S1=simulation 1, S2=simulation 2, S3=simulation 3) From chart -3 we have seen that the distance of all the 3 nodes from the cluster head 3(the node which is found in the 19 th coordinates) in every running time. The distance of the cluster head from itself is. Always the distance of cluster head 3 at all rounds is that is why it s receiving energy is. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Consumed energy of each nodes 8 x 1-6 Energy Consumption 9.988 5 1 15 2 25 3 Chart -5: Residual energy (S1=simulation 1, S2=simulation 2, S3=simulation 3) From chart - 5 we have seen that the total residual energy of all the 3 nodes in every simulation time. The cluster heads are always at the 1 st, 1 th and 19 th node positions being they are cluster heads they have more residual energy than the member nodes. The residual energy of the first simulation is the initial energy of the second simulation and go the like up to the end of the simulation time for each its node. 6. CONCLUSIONS This paper presents Distance Based Cluster Formation for MANETs, which creates clusters based on their distance from the cluster head. Distance based clustering in MANET is very important because it can improve network life time in MANET. We also presented how much energy is consumed and how much energy is left. We used analysis and simulation to show how well these techniques perform in dealing with a clustering. 5 1 15 2 25 3 Chart -4: Consumed energy (S1=simulation 1, S2=simulation 2, S3=simulation 3) 217, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 91:28 Certified Journal Page 848

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 REFERENCES [1] Dr.M.Bala Murugan, Kavi Priya.C Energy Based Cluster Head Selection Algorithm in MANET, Kavi Priya.C et al IJCSET(www.ijcset.net) August 215. [2] Priyanka Chatterjee and Nikhil Agarwal Energy Aware, Scalable, K-Hop Based Cluster Formation In MANET. [3] Ms. Deepika M. Tech Student,Department of Computer Science & Engineering MDU University Rohtak (Haryana) Cluster Based Routing Protocol in MANETs,Vol. 5, No.2, April 216 (ISSN 2278 5973). [4] Bhawnesh Kumar, Vinit Kumar Sharma Distance based Cluster Head Selection Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Network International Journal of Computer Applications (975 8887) Volume 57 No.9, November 212. [5] A.Mercy Rani, J.Sivaranjani An Efficient Position and Distance Based Clustering Approach in Mobile Ad Hoc Network IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSR-JECE) e-issn: 2278-2834,p-ISSN: 2278-8735.Volume 12, Issue 4, Ver. III (Jul.-Aug. 217). [6] Ali Broumandnia, Ehsan Sharifi and Milad Ghahari Bidgoli Reducing Energy Consumption in Mobile ad hoc Networks Using Energy-aware Routing Algorithm Based on Multiple Routes, ACSIJ Advances in Computer Science: an International Journal, Vol. 3, Issue 2, No.8, March 214. 217, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 91:28 Certified Journal Page 849