June 17, SR-NASD Policy to Conduct Fingerprint-based Background Checks of NASD Employees and Independent Contractors

Similar documents
Re: File No. SR-NASD Amendments to NASD Rules 1013 and 1140

File No. SR-NASD-00-70

File No. SR-NASD Random Selection of Arbitrators by the Neutral List Selection System; Accelerated Effectiveness Requested

February 27, Dear Ms. England:

Section 19(b)(3)(A) * Section 19(b)(3)(B) * Section 19(b)(2) * Rule. 19b-4(f)(1) 19b-4(f)(2) (Title *) Managing Director and Deputy General Counsel

December 21, 1998 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL AND HAND DELIVERY

Notice to Members. Branch Office Definition. Executive Summary. Questions/Further Information AUGUST 2002

Regulatory Notice 08-26

NASD NOTICE TO MEMBERS 97-58

File No. SR-NASD-98-96; Amendments to Forms U-4 and U-5

NASD Notice to Members Request For Comment. Executive Summary

Application and Instructions for Firms

Department of Veterans Affairs VA DIRECTIVE April 17, 2006 WEB PAGE PRIVACY POLICY

June 27, Via Electronic Mail. Federal Trade Commission Office of the Secretary Room H Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C.

Regulatory Notice 10-21

Exchange Act Release No (September 4, 2003), 68 FR (September 12, 2003), File No. SR-NASD

70066 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 16, 2003 / Notices

MEMORANDUM. Robert Kreszswick, Director, Membership Services Department. Web CRD Electronic Procedures for Forms U4 and U5

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MANAGING PARTNER AND COMPLIANCE, REGULATORY, AND LEGAL DEPARTMENTS


TRANSAMERICA FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC. NON-REGISTERED ASSOCIATE APPLICATION

Executive Summary. The amendments become effective on September 10, The text of the amendments is attached (see Attachment A).

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) is adopting revisions

California Code of Regulations TITLE 21. PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION 1. DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES CHAPTER 1. OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT

I. PROPOSED DEFINITION OF PRIMARY PURPOSE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE OF THE CAN-SPAM ACT

to the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval System (EDGAR) Filer Manual and

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Securities and Exchange Commission. revisions to the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval System ( EDGAR ) Filer

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) is adopting revisions

CUMBRE VISTA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. RECORDS INSPECTION AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURE. 1-Pl) ~ \ 1

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 90

NYSE and NYSE MKT MEMBERS AND MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS. NYSE Rule 36 - Use of Non-NYSE Provided Cellular Phones on the Floor of the Exchange

to the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval System (EDGAR) Filer Manual and

REMARK MEDIA, INC. Filed by BLUCORA, INC.

PPR TOKENS SALE PRIVACY POLICY. Last updated:

THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 2003: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, December 29, 2003

Acceptable Use Policy

TechTarget Event Sponsorship Terms and Conditions

CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION ( CEII ) REQUEST INSTRUCTIONS

Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, 15 U.S.C et seq. 3

Mississippi Medicaid. Mississippi Medicaid Program Provider Enrollment P.O. Box Jackson, Mississippi Complete form and mail original to:

VIACOM INC. PRIVACY SHIELD PRIVACY POLICY

NYSVMS WEBSITE PRIVACY POLICY

EV^CLMH} MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND

STRENGTHENING THE CYBERSECURITY OF FEDERAL NETWORKS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

H. R To reduce unsolicited commercial electronic mail and to protect children from sexually oriented advertisements.

MANUAL OF UNIVERSITY POLICIES PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES. Applies to: faculty staff students student employees visitors contractors

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release September 23, 2014 EXECUTIVE ORDER

February 18, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

Participation Agreement for the ehealth Exchange

ECLIPSE FOUNDATION, INC. INDIVIDUAL COMMITTER AGREEMENT

Notice to Members. Forms U4. Executive Summary. Questions/Further Information

Please print or type. Complete all areas of Agreement and Enrollment form, unless otherwise indicated.

Records Retention Policy

Notice to Members. Customer Account Statements. Executive Summary. Questions/Further Information. Background and Discussion

Table of contents of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) INTEGRITY efiling system user guide, 2015

NAVIGATION GUIDE FEDERAL REGISTRY. General Information

RESOLUTION DIGEST

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

CHAPTER 13 ELECTRONIC COMMERCE

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Arapahoe Street Denver, CO

Frequently Asked Question Regarding 201 CMR 17.00

Survey on Patient Safety Culture Database Data Use Agreement

You are signing up to use the Middlesex Savings Bank Person to Person Service powered by Acculynk that allows you to send funds to another person.

Regulatory Notice 14-39

Notice to Members. Uniform Branch Office Definition. Executive Summary

APPROVAL FCA103 ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES EXPIRATION DATE: March 31, 2019

Regulatory Notice 18-27

As set out in the Hong Kong ID card, or any relevant identification document referred to in 1(g) above.

March 15, 2011 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulations: What do they mean? What is their impact?

Congratulations Silver Boeing Performance Excellence Award recipient!

Board of Directors Telecommunications Regulatory Authority. The Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (the Authority ) Board of Directors,

Next Generation 911; Text-to-911; Next Generation 911 Applications. SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission)

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation ( NERC ) hereby submits

Entrust SSL Web Server Certificate Subscription Agreement

Schools and Libraries Universal Service Description of Services Requested and Certification Form. Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Response: 3 hours

Re: PIPEDA Complaint: Royal Bank of Canada

April 12, Ms. Mary Jo Kunkle Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission P.O. Box Lansing, MI 48909

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 727 METERING PROTOCOL

SANMINA CORPORATION PRIVACY POLICY. Effective date: May 25, 2018

MISSISSIPPI MEDICAID DENTAL ELECTRONIC CLAIMS ENROLLMENT REGISTRATION

Regulatory Notice 11-26

Change Healthcare CLAIMS Provider Information Form *This form is to ensure accuracy in updating the appropriate account

Customer Proprietary Network Information

GENERAL PRIVACY POLICY

EDI ENROLLMENT AGREEMENT INSTRUCTIONS


Xpress Super may collect and hold the following personal information about you: contact details including addresses and phone numbers;

Railroad Medicare Electronic Data Interchange Application

April 11, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Regulatory Circular RG Members and Member Firm Organizations. Division of Member and Regulatory Services. Date: October 28, 2009

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 8-K

Postal Inspection Service Mail Covers Program

egov and ENV-ITE Walkthrough

Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) System User Access Authorization Form

Ch. 5 UPC SCANNING SYSTEMS CHAPTER 5. UPC SCANNING SYSTEMS AND PLU DEVICES GENERAL

NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rules

Transcription:

June 17, 2004 By Hand Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 RE: SR-NASD-2004-095 Policy to Conduct Fingerprint-based Background Checks of NASD Employees and Independent Contractors Dear Ms. England: Pursuant to Rule 19b-4, enclosed herewith please find the above-numbered rule filing. Also enclosed is a 3-1/2 disk containing the rule filing in Word 7.0 to facilitate production of the Federal Register notice. If you have any questions, please contact Phillip Rosen, Associate Vice President and Associate General Counsel, National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., at (202) 728-8446. The fax number of the Office of General Counsel is (202) 728-8894. Very truly yours, T. Grant Callery Executive Vice President and General Counsel

File No. SR-NASD-2004-095 Consists of 16 Pages June 17, 2004 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. Form 19b-4 Proposed Rule Change by NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. Pursuant to Rule 19b-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Page 2 of 16 1. Text of Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act ), 1 the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ( NASD ) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC or Commission ) a proposed rule change for a program to conduct fingerprint-based background checks of NASD employees and independent contractors in the State of New York ( New York State ) and, as business need may dictate, a program to conduct fingerprint-based background checks of NASD employees and independent contractors outside of New York State. Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is underlined; proposed deletions are in brackets. * * * * * Policy to Conduct Fingerprint-Based Background Checks of NASD Employees and Independent Contractors. (a) In accordance with the requirements of the law of the State of New York New York State ), it shall be the policy of NASD to conduct a fingerprint-based criminal records check of (i) all prospective and current employees located in New York State, and (ii) all prospective and current independent contractors and temporary employees located in New York State who provide services to NASD within New York State and who have access to secure records or systems, or other material or secure buildings or secure property for a specified number of days as determined by NASD from time to time. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).

Page 3 of 16 (b) As business need may dictate and where permitted by applicable law, NASD will implement a program outside of New York State to conduct a fingerprint-based criminal records check of (i) any or all prospective and current employees, and (ii) any or all prospective and current independent contractors or temporary employees who provide services to NASD and who have access to records or systems, or other material or secure buildings or secure property for a specified number of days as determined by NASD from time to time. (c) In implementing the program in New York State or in other jurisdictions, NASD shall submit fingerprint images or cards obtained pursuant to the foregoing program to the Attorney General of the United States or his or her designee for identification and processing. NASD shall at all times maintain the security of fingerprint images or cards and information received from the Attorney General or his or her designee. (d) NASD shall evaluate information received from the Attorney General or his or her designee in accordance with the terms of a written fingerprint policy and provisions of applicable law. A felony or serious misdemeanor conviction will be a factor in considering whether to hire a prospective employee, take adverse employment action with respect to a current employee, or deny prospective or current independent contractors or temporary employees access to NASD s facilities or records. (e) A prospective employee who refuses to submit to fingerprinting shall be denied employment by NASD, and a prospective independent contractor or temporary employee who refuses to submit to fingerprinting under the program shall be denied access to NASD facilities or records. A current employee, independent contractor, or

Page 4 of 16 temporary employee who refuses to submit to fingerprinting under the program will be terminated after having been given notice and three opportunities to comply. (b) Not applicable. (c) Not applicable. * * * * * 2. Procedures of the Self-Regulatory Organization (a) No action by the NASD Board of Governors is necessary for the filing of the proposed rule change. As further discussed below, NASD is filing the proposed rule change for immediate effectiveness. (b) Questions regarding this rule filing may be directed to Phillip Rosen, Associate Vice President and Associate General Counsel, National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., at (202) 728-8446. 3. Self-Regulatory Organization s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change (a) Purpose On August 20, 2002, Governor George E. Pataki signed into law an act to require fingerprint-based background checks of self-regulatory organization ( SRO ) employees who are regularly employed in New York State. 2 The New York law also requires an SRO to fingerprint independent contractors that provide services to the SRO if those individuals have access to records or other material or secure buildings or secure property, which place the security of [the SRO] at risk. 3 The New York law thus 2 3 2002 N.Y. Laws 453 (Aug. 20, 2002). 2002 N.Y. Laws 453 (Aug. 20, 2002).

Page 5 of 16 requires NASD to implement and maintain a fingerprinting program for employees and certain independent contractors in New York State. Access to the Federal Bureau of Investigation s ( FBI ) database of fingerprintbased criminal records is permitted only when authorized by law. Numerous federal and state laws authorize employers to conduct fingerprint-based background checks that make use of the FBI s database. 4 Notably, Section 17(f)(2) of the Act 5 and SEC Rule 17f-2 6 require employees of broker-dealers, transfer agents, and clearing agencies to be fingerprinted and authorize SROs to maintain facilities for processing and storing fingerprint cards and criminal record information received from the FBI database with respect to such cards. Although Section 17(f)(2) does explicitly direct the Attorney General of the United States (i.e., the FBI) to provide SROs designated by the Commission with access to criminal history record information, it does not, however, require SROs to fingerprint their own employees. NASD believes, therefore, that a proposed rule change for a fingerprinting program for NASD employees and independent contractors located in New York State is a necessary component of NASD s compliance with New York State law, and of any plan by NASD, as dictated by its assessment of business need, to implement a program for fingerprint-based background checks of its employees and independent contractors in other jurisdictions as permitted by law. 4 5 6 See, e.g., 42 U.S.C. 5119a (child care providers); Pub. L. 92-544, 86 Stat. 1109, 1115 (employees of federally chartered or insured banks); Alaska Stat. 04.11.295 (liquor license applicants); Ariz. Rev. Stat. 32-122.02 (home inspectors); Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 6980.18 (locksmiths); Fla. Stat. 468.453 (athlete agents); Official Code Ga. Ann. 43-47-6 (used car dealers); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 3770.051 (vendors of lottery equipment). 15 U.S.C. 78q(f)(2). 17 C.F.R. 240.17f-2.

Page 6 of 16 A fingerprinting program is consistent with NASD s statutory obligations under Section 15A of the Act 7 to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and protect investors and the public interest. As reflected in the text of the proposed rule change, the program applies to: (1) prospective and current employees of New York State, as well as prospective and current temporary employees and independent contractors in New York State who have or are anticipated to have access to NASD facilities in New York State or NASD records or systems for a specified number of days as determined by NASD from time to time, and (2) as NASD deems necessary according to business need, to prospective and/or current employees in other jurisdictions, as well as prospective and current temporary employees and independent contractors who have or are anticipated to have access to NASD facilities or records in other jurisdictions. NASD evaluates information received from the FBI concerning an individual in accordance with the terms of NASD s written fingerprint policy, which reflects the application of employment laws governing the use of information concerning criminal convictions in employment decisions. In accordance with such laws, a felony or serious misdemeanor conviction will be a factor in considering whether to hire a prospective employee, take adverse employment action with respect to a current employee, or deny prospective or current independent contractors or temporary employees access to NASD s facilities or records. (b) Statutory Basis 7 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.

Page 7 of 16 NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Sections 15A(b)(6) of the Act 8, which requires, among other things, that NASD s rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. NASD believes the proposed rule change will provide a basis for NASD s compliance with New York State law, which requires fingerprint-based background checks of selfregulatory organization ( SRO ) employees who are regularly employed in New York State as well as of independent contractors that provide services to the SRO if those individuals have access to records or other material or secure buildings or secure property, which place the security of [the SRO] at risk, and further permit NASD to implement a fingerprinting program in other jurisdictions, as business need may dictate. 4. Self-Regulatory Organization s Statement on Burden on Competition NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. 5. Self-Regulatory Organization s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. 6. Extension of Time Period for Commission Action NASD does not consent at this time to an extension of the time period for Commission action specified in Section 19(b)(2) of the Act. 9 8 9 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(6). 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

Page 8 of 16 7. Basis for Summary Effectiveness Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3) or for Accelerated Effectiveness Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) The proposed rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) 10 of the Act and paragraph (f)(3) of Rule 19b-4 11 thereunder, in that the proposed rule change is concerned solely with the administration of NASD. 8. Proposed Rule Change Based on Rules of Another Self-Regulatory Organization of the Commission Not applicable. 9. Exhibits Register. 1. Completed notice of proposed rule change for publication in the Federal Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, NASD has duly caused this filing to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly organized. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. BY: Barbara Z. Sweeney, Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary Date: June 17, 2004 10 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).

Page 9 of 16 EXHIBIT 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (Release No. 34- ; File No. SR-NASD-2004-095) June 17, 2004 Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. for a Fingerprinting Program for NASD Employees and Independent Contractors in the State of New York, and, as Dictated by Business Need, in Other Jurisdictions Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act ), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on June 17, 2004, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ( NASD ), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ( Commission ) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. NASD has designated the proposed rule change as administrative under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b- 4(f)(3) thereunder 4, which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this filing by the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. SELF-REGULATORY ORGANIZATION S STATEMENT OF THE TERMS OF SUBSTANCE OF THE PROPOSED RULE CHANGE NASD has adopted an internal policy for a program for conducting fingerprintbased background checks of NASD employees and independent contractors in the State 1 2 3 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).

Page 10 of 16 of New York pursuant to New York State law, and in other jurisdictions as business need may dictate. Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is underlined; proposed deletions are in brackets. * * * * * Policy to Conduct Fingerprint-Based Background Checks of NASD Employees and Independent Contractors. (a) In accordance with the requirements of the law of the State of New York New York State ), it shall be the policy of NASD to conduct a fingerprint-based criminal records check of (i) all prospective and current employees located in New York State, and (ii) all prospective and current independent contractors and temporary employees located in New York State who provide services to NASD within New York State and who have access to secure records or systems, or other material or secure buildings or secure property for a specified number of days as determined by NASD from time to time. (b) As business need may dictate and where permitted by applicable law, NASD will implement a program outside of New York State to conduct a fingerprint-based criminal records check of (i) any or all prospective and current employees, and (ii) any or all prospective and current independent contractors or temporary employees who provide services to NASD and who have access to records or systems, or other material or secure buildings or secure property for a specified number of days as determined by NASD from time to time. (c) In implementing the program in New York State or in other jurisdictions, NASD shall submit fingerprint images or cards obtained pursuant to the foregoing

Page 11 of 16 program to the Attorney General of the United States or his or her designee for identification and processing. NASD shall at all times maintain the security of fingerprint images or cards and information received from the Attorney General or his or her designee. (d) NASD shall evaluate information received from the Attorney General or his or her designee in accordance with the terms of a written fingerprint policy and provisions of applicable law. A felony or serious misdemeanor conviction will be a factor in considering whether to hire a prospective employee, take adverse employment action with respect to a current employee, or deny prospective or current independent contractors or temporary employees access to NASD s facilities or records. (e) A prospective employee who refuses to submit to fingerprinting shall be denied employment by NASD, and a prospective independent contractor or temporary employee who refuses to submit to fingerprinting under the program shall be denied access to NASD facilities or records. A current employee, independent contractor, or temporary employee who refuses to submit to fingerprinting under the program will be terminated after having been given notice and three opportunities to comply. * * * * * II. SELF-REGULATORY ORGANIZATION S STATEMENT OF THE PURPOSE OF, AND STATUTORY BASIS FOR, THE PROPOSED RULE CHANGE In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at

Page 12 of 16 the places specified in Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. (A) Self-Regulatory Organization s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose On August 20, 2002, Governor George E. Pataki signed into law an act to require fingerprint-based background checks of self-regulatory organization ( SRO ) employees who are regularly employed in New York State. 5 The New York law also requires an SRO to fingerprint independent contractors that provide services to the SRO if those individuals have access to records or other material or secure buildings or secure property, which place the security of [the SRO] at risk. 6 The New York law thus requires NASD to implement and maintain a fingerprinting program for employees and certain independent contractors in New York State. Access to the Federal Bureau of Investigation s ( FBI ) database of fingerprintbased criminal records is permitted only when authorized by law. Numerous federal and state laws authorize employers to conduct fingerprint-based background checks that make use of the FBI s database. 7 Notably, Section 17(f)(2) of the Act 8 and SEC Rule 17f-2 9 5 6 7 8 9 2002 N.Y. Laws 453 (Aug. 20, 2002). 2002 N.Y. Laws 453 (Aug. 20, 2002). See, e.g., 42 U.S.C. 5119a (child care providers); Pub. L. 92-544, 86 Stat. 1109, 1115 (employees of federally chartered or insured banks); Alaska Stat. 04.11.295 (liquor license applicants); Ariz. Rev. Stat. 32-122.02 (home inspectors); Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 6980.18 (locksmiths); Fla. Stat. 468.453 (athlete agents); Official Code Ga. Ann. 43-47-6 (used car dealers); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 3770.051 (vendors of lottery equipment). 15 U.S.C. 78q(f)(2). 17 C.F.R. 240.17f-2.

Page 13 of 16 require employees of broker-dealers, transfer agents, and clearing agencies to be fingerprinted and authorize SROs to maintain facilities for processing and storing fingerprint cards and criminal record information received from the FBI database with respect to such cards. Although Section 17(f)(2) does explicitly direct the Attorney General of the United States (i.e., the FBI) to provide SROs designated by the Commission with access to criminal history record information, it does not, however, require SROs to fingerprint their own employees. NASD believes, therefore, that a proposed rule change for a fingerprinting program for NASD employees and independent contractors located in New York State is a necessary component of NASD s compliance with New York State law, and of any plan by NASD, as dictated by its assessment of business need, to implement a program for fingerprint-based background checks of its employees and independent contractors in other jurisdictions as permitted by law. A fingerprinting program is consistent with NASD s statutory obligations under Section 15A of the Act 10 to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and protect investors and the public interest. As reflected in the text of the proposed rule change, the program applies to: (1) prospective and current employees of New York State, as well as prospective and current temporary employees and independent contractors in New York State who have or are anticipated to have access to NASD facilities in New York State or NASD records or systems for a specified number of days as determined by NASD from time to time, and 10 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.

Page 14 of 16 (2) as NASD deems necessary according to business need, to prospective and/or current employees in other jurisdictions, as well as prospective and current temporary employees and independent contractors who have or are anticipated to have access to NASD facilities or records in other jurisdictions. NASD evaluates information received from the FBI concerning an individual in accordance with the terms of NASD s written fingerprint policy, which reflects the application of employment laws governing the use of information concerning criminal convictions in employment decisions. In accordance with such laws, a felony or serious misdemeanor conviction will be a factor in considering whether to hire a prospective employee, take adverse employment action with respect to a current employee, or deny prospective or current independent contractors or temporary employees access to NASD s facilities or records. 2. Statutory Basis NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Sections 15A(b)(6) of the Act 11, which requires, among other things, that NASD s rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. NASD believes the proposed rule change will provide a basis for NASD s compliance with New York State law, which requires fingerprint-based background checks of selfregulatory organization ( SRO ) employees who are regularly employed in New York State as well as of independent contractors that provide services to the SRO if those individuals have access to records or other material or secure buildings or secure 11 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(6).

Page 15 of 16 property, which place the security of [the SRO] at risk, and further permit NASD to implement a fingerprinting program in other jurisdictions, as business need may dictate. (B) Self-Regulatory Organization s Statement on Burden on Competition NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. (C) Self-Regulatory Organization s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. DATE OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROPOSED RULE CHANGE AND TIMING FOR COMMISSION ACTION. NASD has designated the proposed rule change as administrative under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 12 and Rule 19b-4(f)(3) thereunder 13, which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this filing by the Commission. At any time within 60 days of this filing, the Commission may summarily abrogate this proposal if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. IV. SOLICITATION OF COMMENTS Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change in consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the 12 13 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).

Page 16 of 16 Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. Comments may also be submitted electronically at the following e-mail address: rule-comments@sec.gov. All comment letters should refer to File No. SR- NASD-2004-095. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help us process and review comments more efficiently, comments should be sent in hardcopy or by e-mail but not by both methods. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of NASD. All submissions should refer to the file number in the caption above and should be submitted by [insert date 21 days from the date of publication]. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority, 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Margaret H. McFarland Deputy Secretary