COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) GUIDELINE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR PLASMA MASTER FILE (PMF) CERTIFICATION

Similar documents
BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Type IB Variations. CMD(v)/BPG/005. Edition 00. Edition date: Implementation date:

CMD(v)/BPG/006. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE For. Type II Variations. Edition 00. Edition date:

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for The classification of unforeseen variations

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE. For Type IB Variations. CMDv/BPG/005 Edition 05. Edition date: 10 April 2015

VARIATION FILING PROCEDURE IN EUROPE: A COMPLETE REVIEW

ICH Topic M 4 Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Organisation CTD. Step 5

Standard operating procedure

Title: Handling of Art. 29(1) referrals to the CMDh (60 day procedure) by the CMDh secretariat (incl. Article 13 referrals for variations)

3 September

1. Document Control 2. Change Record Version Date Author(s) Comments 3. Reviewers Version Name Organisation 4. Distribution Version Date Name Status

Date: May 19, Dear Dr. Domingo,

Standard operating procedure

Pre-notification check for type IB Variations 1

Continuing Professional Education (CPE) CPE Rules for Pesticide Advisors

European Aviation Safety Agency

Multinational assessment teams

Content of mandatory certificates

esubmission Gateway and Web Client Training on the use of XML delivery files for Veterinary submissions

Standard operating procedure

NATIONAL PROGRAMME Chapter 15 Telecommunication and Post. Telecommunication and Post

Q&A QP Declaration. Table of contents

Cover note on XEVMPD substance controlled vocabulary following the quality control exercise

Standard operating procedure

Submission of information in the public consultation on potential candidates for substitution under the Biocidal Products Regulation

INSPIRE status report

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

Standard operating procedure

Lead Author Approver Effective Date: 13-MAR-13 Name: Ana Rodriguez Sanchez Review Date: 13-MAR-16

User Guidance for submissions via esubmission Gateway / Web Client using xml delivery files

Digital Signatures Act 1

Chapter 1. Purpose, definitions and application

ENCePP Code of Conduct Implementation Guidance for Sharing of ENCePP Study Data

ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY

INAB Mandatory and Guidance Documents Policy and Index

Mock-ups checklist - Guidance for checking mock-ups

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU)

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION

Isabella Marta, Head of Marketing Authorization Department Italian Medicines Agency

S. Scholz / K. Meyer / J.E. Nielsen / Harald Drück/J.Fernández/E.Prado/L.Nelson Page 1 of 7

Guidelines 4/2018 on the accreditation of certification bodies under Article 43 of the General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679)

The Role of the QP in MA Compliance

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (EMA) CONSULTATION

Management of RMP for CAPs in postauthorisation

EMA Common Repository: Questions and answers relating to practical and technical aspects of the implementation

QP Current Practices, Challenges and Mysteries. Caitriona Lenagh 16 March 2012

Biocides Submission Manual

PCN CRITERIA FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF LEVEL 3 TECHNICIANS FOR GUIDED WAVE TESTING AS A TRANSITIONAL ARRANGEMENT

SUBMISSION OF COMMENTS ON

INAB Mandatory and Guidance Documents Policy and Index

IECEx OPERATIONAL DOCUMENT

GMO Register User Guide

Data Processing Clauses

Inter American Accreditation Cooperation. IAAC, IAF and ILAC Resolutions Applicable to IAAC MLA Peer Evaluations

Voluntary certification at an intermediate stage of manufacture

EUIPO Ex-ante product quality audits (trademarks and designs) Prior Checking Opinion Case

Biocides Submission Manual

Guidance for the format and content of the final study report of non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies

Guidance for registration with EudraVigilance Veterinary

POLICY FOR THE RE-ISSUE OF NATIONAL CERTIFICATES

IECEx OPERATIONAL DOCUMENT

GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF THE SERVICES DIRECTIVE NOTIFICATIONS FUNCTION IN IMI

The WIN applies to the Vet Applications team in the Veterinary Regulatory and Organisational Support service (V-VM-ROS).

Certification Commission of NAMSS Policies and Procedures

Rules for LNE Certification of Management Systems

Certification rules for the mark

USING STANDARDS TO ASSESS THE COMPETENCE OF CONFORMITY

BOARD OF THE BANK OF LITHUANIA. RESOLUTION No 46 ON THE REGULATIONS ON KEEPING THE PUBLIC REGISTER OF PAYMENT INSTITUTIONS. of 24 December 2009

Applies to: SA Administrative Assistant, SAWP Scientific Secretary and SA secretarial team in Scientific Advice Section

Vaccine data collection tool Oct Functions, Indicators & Sub-Indicators

esubmissions Web UI Release Notes

Sector Vision for the Future of Reference Standards

BSCP128 Production, Submission, Audit and Approval of Line Loss Factors Version 3.0. Balancing and Settlement Code. BSC Procedure DRAFT

Standard operating procedure

Variations in ectd format Q&A document

Auction Calendar 2017/2018 for Capacity Allocation Mechanism Network Code

BSCP128 Production, Submission, Audit and Approval of Line Loss Factors Version 3.0. Balancing and Settlement Code. BSC Procedure DRAFT

CEN and CENELEC Position Paper on the draft regulation ''Cybersecurity Act''

esubmissions Web UI Release Notes

EU Code of Conduct on Data Centre Energy Efficiency

ACER ON THE ADOPTION OF COMMON NETWORK OPERATION TOOLS BY ENTSOG. OPINION Of THE AGENCY FOR THE COOPERATION Of ENERGY REGULATORS No 04/2017

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

An unofficial translation, in case of any discrepancies between the English version and the original Swedish version the latter will prevail.

TURKISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION

IRIS Quick guide to the portal for Orphan Industry users

PSUR Repository Implementation Plan

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

SmPC and. & New QRD. Spanish Medicines Agency (AEMPS)

GUIDELINES FOR DOCUMENT CONTROL

Guidance for electronic submissions for Certificates of Suitability (CEP) applications

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value Added Tax GFV N O 070

SLOVAK FOREST CERTIFICATION SYSTEM September 1, 2008

(Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 172, , p. 10)

Guideline on the specifications for provision of an electronic submission (e-submission) for a veterinary medicinal product

COREP/FINREP XBRL Taxonomy v2.0.0

NIST Designation of CABs: Upcoming Changes for the US and EU Review for Japan

EMA esubmission Gateway and Web Client: Questions and answers on Veterinary Applications

Norme NET 4 Européenne de Télécommunication

Standard operating procedure

EA Document for Recognition of Verifiers under the EU ETS Directive

ENISA s Position on the NIS Directive

Transcription:

The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 26 February 2004 COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) GUIDELINE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR PLASMA MASTER FILE (PMF) CERTIFICATION DISCUSSION IN THE BIOTECH WORKING PARTY July 2003 TRANSMISSION TO CPMP July 2003 RELEASE FOR CONSULTATION of WORKING DOCUMENT July 2003 DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS End August 2003 DISCUSSION IN THE BIOTECH WORKING PARTY September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 TRANSMISSION TO CPMP January 2004 ADOPTION BY CPMP February 2004 DATE FOR COMING INTO OPERATION March 2004 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK Tel. (44-20) 74 18 84 00 Fax (44-20) 74 18 8545 E-mail: mail@emea.eu.int http://www.emea.eu.int EMEA 2004 Reproduction and/or distribution of this document is authorised for non commercial purposes only provided the EMEA is acknowledged

GUIDELINE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR PLASMA MASTER FILE (PMF) CERTIFICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 4 2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK... 4 3. PRINCIPLES OF THE PMF CERTIFICATION... 4 4. INITIAL CERTIFICATION OF A PMF... 5 4.1 TRIGGER FOR SUBMISSION OF A PMF APPLICATION.... 5 4.2 PRE-SUBMISSION ACTIVITIES... 6 4.2.1 Letter of intent to EMEA... 6 4.2.2 Appointment of co-ordinators... 6 4.3 SUBMISSION AND VALIDATION... 6 4.4 EVALUATION... 6 4.5 INSPECTION(S)... 7 4.6 CERTIFICATION... 7 5. REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION... 7 5.1 ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION... 7 5.2 EXPERT STATEMENT... 8 5.3 SCIENTIFIC DATA... 8 5.4 SPECIFIC DOSSIER REQUIREMENTS... 8 6. CHANGES TO THE CONTENT OF A PMF (VARIATIONS)... 8 6.1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK... 8 6.2 PROCEDURE FOR VARIATIONS TO THE TERMS OF A PMF CERTIFICATE... 8 7. RE-CERTIFICATION OF PMF... 9 7.1 DOCUMENTATION... 9 7.1.1 Administrative information...9 7.1.2 Scientific Data...9 8. USE OF PMF CERTIFICATES WHEN SUBMITTING NEW MAAS... 9 ANNEX 1... 10 ANNEX 2... 11 EMEA 2004 Page 2/11

Note: This document contains a number of abbreviations, a list of which is provided here below: BWP Biotechnology Working Party CPMP Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products MAA Marketing Authorisation Application MA Marketing Authorisation MAH(s) Marketing Authorisation Holder(s) MRFG Mutual Recognition Facilitation Group MR Mutual Recognition MS Member State PMF Plasma Master File EMEA 2004 Page 3/11

1. INTRODUCTION This document is intended to provide guidance on issues associated with the submission, evaluation and certification of the Plasma Master File (PMF) by the EMEA. This guidance may be reviewed as experience is gained. The detailed scientific requirements for an application for PMF certification are described in the Guideline on the Scientific Data Requirements for a Plasma Master File 1. Where a PMF corresponds only to blood/plasma-derived medicinal products the marketing authorisation of which is restricted to a single Member State (MS), the scientific and technical evaluation of the said PMF shall be carried out by the national competent authority of that MS. This guidance document does not cover this situation. 2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK Commission Directive 2003/63/EC of 25 June 2003 amending Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use introduces the concept of the PMF. Part III, section 1.1 of Annex I lays down specific requirements related to PMF and states that For medicinal products derived from human blood or plasma and by derogation from the provisions of Module 3, the dossier requirements mentioned in "Information related to the starting and raw materials", for starting materials made of human blood/plasma may be replaced by a PMF certified in accordance with this Part. 2 3. PRINCIPLES OF THE PMF CERTIFICATION The use of the PMF certification system is optional. The PMF is a stand-alone documentation, which is separate from the dossier for marketing authorisation, which provides all relevant detailed information on the characteristics of the entire human plasma used as a starting material and/or a raw material for the manufacture of sub/intermediate fractions, constituents of the excipient and active substance(s), which are part of medicinal products or medical devices incorporating stable derivatives of human blood or human plasma. 3. The PMF certification system is aimed at simplifying the tasks of both MA applicants/mahs and Competent Authorities by: Reducing the number of dossiers submissions and data evaluations carried out for the same plasma. Ensuring consistency throughout the European Community. The PMF certification consists of an assessment of the PMF application dossier submitted by the Applicant in a system analogous to the centralised procedure, which results in a certificate of compliance to Community legislation issued by the EMEA. This certificate shall be valid throughout the European Community. As a second step, the competent authority that will grant or has granted the MA shall take into account the effect of the certification or re-certification of the PMF on the concerned medicinal product(s) (Figure 1). PMF certification can also be used for medical devices 1 EMEA/CPMP/BWP/3794/03 2 Commission Directive 2003/63/EC, O.J. L159/80, vol. 46, 27.6.2003 3 Referred to in Directive 2000/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000 amending Council Directive 93/42/EC as regards medical devices incorporating stable derivatives of human blood or human plasma (OJ L 313, 13.12.2000, p. 22). EMEA 2004 Page 4/11

incorporating stable derivatives of human blood or human plasma. In the case of medical devices, the EMEA shall take into account the effect of the certification or re-certification of the PMF on the concerned stable derivative of human blood or plasma. This document only deals with the first step; details on the second step procedure will be given in a separate guidance document Product A using Plasma X Certificate of Compliance (valid throughout the European Community) Product B using Plasma X Product C using Plasma X 1 st Step PMF certification (EMEA, centralised) 2 nd Step impact on the concerned medicinal products (Competent Authority) Concerned medicinal products (linked MAs) in which the Plasma X is used Figure 1: General principles of a PMF. A Marketing Authorisation (MA) or a Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) may refer to one or more PMFs or respective certificates. Once the applicant chooses to use the Community PMF certification system, all variations to the corresponding plasma for all the linked MAs will have to be submitted through the same certification system. 4. INITIAL CERTIFICATION OF A PMF 4.1 Trigger for submission of a PMF application. An application for certification of a PMF may be submitted as follows (see also the diagram in Annex 1): 1. In the framework of a new MAA via the centralised procedure. In this case, the certification of the PMF is an intrinsic part of the assessment of the MAA dossier done at the EMEA. 2. In the framework of a new MAA via Mutual Recognition (MR) procedure. 3. In the framework of a new purely national MAA, provided the PMF corresponds to blood/plasma-derived medicinal products with marketing authorisations in more than one MS. 4. In the case of existing MAs, the PMF certification application may be initiated at any time, e.g. when: (i) The data submitted for certification are identical to the corresponding data approved in all proposed linked MAs, and no changes are proposed during the certification, (ii) A change (variation) to the data approved in all linked MAs is proposed by the Applicant (iii) Annual update is due. EMEA 2004 Page 5/11

5. Alternatively, a new PMF can be submitted for certification separately, at anytime in advance of any application for a MA, or for a consultation on a blood derivative incorporated in a medical device. Note for applicants: It is not possible to certify a PMF that might change during the procedure. Therefore, it is strongly advised not to initiate a PMF certification when there are ongoing variations related to the content of the PMF in the individual MA(s). Additionally, the MAHs should not submit variations related to the content of the PMF during the certification procedure. 4.2 Pre-submission activities Prior the submission of the PMF application (see section 4.1), the MA Applicant/MAH should inform the relevant Competent Authority(ies) that they intend to use the Community PMF certification system. 4.2.1 Letter of intent to EMEA Applicants should ideally inform the EMEA of their intention to submit PMF applications approximately 2-3 months before submission, specifying the intended submission date and the appropriate trigger for submission (see section 4.1, and Annex 1 & 2). A list of MAs/MAAs, to which the respective PMF will apply, with the corresponding MS of authorisation, should also be provided at this time. In addition, a list of establishments 4 in which blood/plasma collection, testing, storage and transportation is carried out, with the corresponding inspection and approval information, should also be provided, where applicable. The Applicant should also propose co-ordinator(s) in their letter of intent. The coordinator(s) will be responsible for the evaluation of the PMF certification application on behalf of the EMEA. 4.2.2 Appointment of co-ordinators Two co-ordinators will be appointed by the CPMP in consultation with the BWP; the appointment will be notified to the Applicant and where appropriate to the Mutual Recognition Facilitation Group (MRFG) and the National Authority. The EMEA will publish a list of PMF co-ordinators. 4.3 Submission and validation The monthly deadline for submission of applications for PMF certification will be published on the EMEA website. The Applicant shall submit the application and accompanying documentation to the EMEA, to the co-ordinators, and to the MS according to their requirements. All documentation requirements for the EMEA, co-ordinators and MS will be published on the EMEA website. The validation of the submission will be performed by the EMEA and the outcome communicated to the Applicant together with the evaluation timetable. 4.4 Evaluation In all cases, an evaluation report will be prepared by the appointed co-ordinator(s) and circulated for review by the BWP. The BWP will then make appropriate recommendations on the outcome of the evaluation, to the CPMP. 4 Blood establishment means any structure or body that is responsible for any aspect of the collection and testing of human blood and blood components, whatever their intended purpose, and their processing, storage and distribution, as defined in Article 3 of Directive 2002/98/EC. EMEA 2004 Page 6/11

In the case of a PMF certification application submitted within a centralised MAA, the assessment will, by definition, be embedded in the centralised evaluation procedure. The timetable will follow that of the respective MAA. Certification may occur at any stage prior to or at the stage of the CPMP opinion on the MAA. The timetable for all other PMF certification applications following triggers 2, 3, 4 and 5 will be as follows (see annex 2): Day -10 EMEA validation of the PMF application Day 0 Clock start (at official CPMP start date) Day 30 CPMP adoption of inspections of blood establishments, if necessary. Day 45 Circulation of co-ordinators evaluation report to the BWP. Subsequent transmission of this report, by the EMEA, to the Applicant. Day 75 Comments BWP members Day 83 BWP discussion/recommendation Day 90 CPMP adoption of the evaluation report & certification/list of Questions (clock stop)* * A response timetable may be arranged as necessary. In the case of a PMF certification application submitted within a national MAA which may be going for MR (trigger 2 and 3, section 4.1), the assessment should be instigated before or at the beginning of the national authorisation process, so that the Certificate is available before the end of the initial 210 day review process. In some circumstances (e.g. in the case of initial PMF certification for already existing MAs when PMF data have been previously assessed & authorised via a centralised MA), there may be no need for scientific re-evaluation of the data and the timetable will be shortened. 4.5 Inspection(s) When considered necessary to complete the assessment of the submitted PMF, (an) inspection(s) may be requested by the CPMP. Inspection(s) requested must be carried out and the final report(s) sent to the EMEA and submitted to the CPMP in accordance with the 90- day time limit for the evaluation of the PMF. Due to the time constraints, MA applicants/mahs should inform the EMEA of their intention to submit the PMF application 2-3 months before submission and include a list of blood establishments, with the corresponding inspection information and supportive documentation, as described in chapter 3.1 of the Guideline on the Scientific Data Requirements for PMF. 4.6 Certification Within 5 working days of the adoption of a positive evaluation report by the CPMP, the EMEA will issue a PMF certificate. The evaluation report will accompany the certificate. Within 5 working days of the adoption of a negative evaluation report by the CPMP, the EMEA will issue a letter refusing the grant of a certificate for a PMF. The evaluation report will be attached to the refusal letter. In both cases, the Applicant and MS will be notified. 5. REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION 5.1 Administrative information The following documentation should be provided in the initial application for certification: An application form for each EMEA PMF certification submission. EMEA 2004 Page 7/11

A list of medicinal products to which the PMF will apply, with corresponding MAs/reference numbers, countries of authorisation (MS and Third Countries) and approval dates. Information on pending approvals should also be given (e.g. pending MA or pending application for use of a medicinal product in clinical trials, or use in medical devices). The period of data collection should be specified. The data lock point (i.e. the date designated as the cut-off date for data to be included in the PMF) should also be specified. 5.2 Expert statement The Applicant should provide an Expert statement on the data submitted for certification. This should also include an overview/summary of the Applicant s view of the possible impact of the PMF to each linked MA. 5.3 Scientific data Refer to the Guideline on the scientific data requirements for a Plasma Master File (PMF) (EMEA/CPMP/BWP/3794/03). 5.4 Specific dossier requirements Specific dossier requirements are as follows: For triggers 4 (ii) and 4 (iii), the change(s) introduced should be clearly highlighted in the PMF dossier. Where the PMF data has been already approved as part of a centrally-authorised MA, reference to the EMEA procedure number should be given in the dossier submission. In the event that there is no centralised MA, then reference should be given to the most recent MR MA. 6. CHANGES TO THE CONTENT OF A PMF (VARIATIONS) 6.1 Legal framework A variation to the terms of a PMF certificate must be submitted in accordance with Article 1 (2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1085/2003 of 3 June 2003 concerning the examination of variations to the terms of a marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products falling within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93. 6.2 Procedure for Variations to the terms of a PMF certificate The variation submission, data requirements and evaluation will follow the current established procedure for variations to centralised MAs. The Certificate Holder shall submit the PMF variation application and supporting documentation to the EMEA, to the co-ordinators, and to the MS. All documentation requirements for the EMEA, co-ordinators and MS will be published on the EMEA website. By analogy to the original submission for certification, for type II variations, an expert statement including the Certificate Holder s view of the possible impact of the PMF to each linked MA should be provided. Once approved, the EMEA will deliver a certificate of compliance to Community legislation with the variation evaluation report attached. EMEA 2004 Page 8/11

7. RE-CERTIFICATION OF PMF Following the initial certification at the EMEA, the PMF shall be updated and re-certified on an annual basis. The existing certificate remains valid until the evaluation of the recertification is determined. The PMF Holder shall ensure that it submits the re-certification PMF annual update application and supporting documentation to the EMEA, to the co-ordinators, and to the MS according to their requirements. All documentation requirements for the EMEA, coordinators and MS will be published on the EMEA website. The application for this re-certification of the PMF shall be submitted at the agreed birth date of the PMF and yearly thereafter. The assessment of the PMF submission for re-certification will be carried out as a 60-day procedure, similar to the current established procedure for Type II variations to centralised MAs. Changes to the PMF may be submitted with the application for re-certification. 7.1 Documentation 7.1.1 Administrative information See section 5.1. 7.1.2 Scientific Data See section 5.2. 8. USE OF PMF CERTIFICATES WHEN SUBMITTING NEW MAAs When submitting an application for a new MA, the MA Applicant should notify the EMEA or the National Competent Authority, where appropriate, of the use of PMF certificates in the application. The MA Applicant will be required to provide, to the relevant competent authority, all valid PMF certificates of compliance to Community legislation and accompanying evaluation reports together with the respective PMF data package. In addition, a signed declaration that these certificates are fully applicable to the data contained in the respective MAA is required. The list of relevant medicinal products, including pending MAAs, to which the PMF applies, forms part of the PMF application. This list should be updated by the Certificate holder after the new MA has been granted together with a signed declaration stating that the PMF data are fully applicable to the attached updated list of all linked MAs, highlighting the new MA additions. The updated list and declaration should be sent to the EMEA, all co-ordinators and MS. EMEA 2004 Page 9/11

ANNEX 1 New MAA Product A Using Plasma X No new Only existing Using the same plasma (linked MAs) No new MAA No existing MAs The PMF is submitted independently of any MA dossier Centralised Procedure Mutual Recognition Procedure Purely National All linked MAs are restricted to one single Member State Linked MAs are not restricted to one single Member State Trigger 5 Trigger 1 Trigger 2 The PMF does not correspond to blood/plasma-derived medicinal products the marketing authorisation of which is restricted to a single Member State The PMF corresponds only to blood/plasma-derived medicinal products the marketing authorisation of which is restricted to a single Member State Data submitted for PMF certification are identical to the data approved in all proposed linked MAs A change (variation) to the PMF data approved in all linked MAs is proposed by the Applicant Annual update Trigger 4 (i) Trigger 4 (ii) Trigger 4 (iii) Trigger 3 Purely National procedure PMF evaluation carried out by the National Competent Authority (this case is not covered by this guidance document) EMEA 2004 Page 10/11

ANNEX 2 Timetable for Initial Certification of PMF -10 days Day 0 45 days 75 days 83 days 90 days EMEA validation Clock start (CPMP) Circulation of Co-ordinator s report *The response timetable will be 90 days. The milestones will follow the initial evaluation Comments from BWP BWP discussion recommendation CPMP adoption of positive evaluation report + 5 working days EMEA certificate sent to Applicant CPMP LOQ clock stop 91 days Response to LOQ- CPMP clock start 91+x days * CPMP adoption of evaluation report + 5 working days EMEA certificate/ refusal letter sent to Applicant EMEA 2004 Page 11/11