ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES
|
|
- Asher McBride
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES FEDERICO ARDILA, MATTHIAS BECK, SERKAN HOŞTEN, JULIAN PFEIFLE, AND KIM SEASHORE Abstract. The conve hull of the roots of a classical root lattice is called a root polytope. We determine eplicit unimodular triangulations of the boundaries of the root polytopes associated to the root lattices A n, C n and D n, and compute their f-and h-vectors. This leads us to recover formulae for the growth series of these root lattices, which were first conjectured by Conway Mallows Sloane and Baae Grimm and proved by Conway Sloane and Bacher de la Harpe Venov.. Introduction A lattice L is a discrete subgroup of R n for some n Z >0. The ran of a lattice is the dimension of the subspace spanned by the lattice. We say that a lattice L is generated as a monoid by a finite collection of vectors M = {a,..., a r } if each u L is a nonnegative integer combination of the vectors in M. For convenience, we often write the vectors from M as columns of a matri M R n r, and to mae the connection between L and M more transparent, we refer to the lattice generated by M as L M. The word length of u with respect to M, denoted w(u, is min( c i taen over all epressions u = c i a i with c i Z 0. The growth function S( counts the number of elements u L with word length w(u = with respect to M. We define the growth series to be the generating function G( := 0 S(. It is a rational function G( = where h( is a polynomial of h( ( d degree less than or equal to the ran d of L M [4]. We call h( the coordinator polynomial of the growth series. It is important to eep in mind that these functions all depend on the choice of generators for the monoid. In this paper we eamine the growth series for the classical root lattices A n, C n and D n, generated as monoids by their standard set of generators. Conway and Sloane [7] proved an eplicit formula for the growth series for A n and, with Mallows s help, conjectured one for the D n case. Baae and Grimm [] later conjectured formulae for the B n and C n cases. Bacher, de la Harpe, and Venov [2] subsequently provided the proofs of all these cases. We give alternative proofs of the formulae in the cases A n, C n, and D n, by computing the f-vector of a unimodular triangulation of the corresponding root polytope. The approach presented here is a natural etension of the proofs related to the growth series of cyclotomic lattices given in [3]. We let P M be the polytope formed by the conve hull of the generating vectors in M. For the lattices we consider, this polytope is the root polytope of the corresponding lattice. We determine eplicit unimodular triangulations of these polytopes and show that the h-polynomial of these triangulations (hence, of any unimodular triangulation is identical to the coordinator polynomial h( for the respective root lattice. Our method Date: 26 September Research partially supported by NSF grants DMS (Ardila and DMS (Bec, and MEC grants MTM C02-0 and MTM (Pfeifle.
2 2 FEDERICO ARDILA, MATTHIAS BECK, SERKAN HOŞTEN, JULIAN PFEIFLE, AND KIM SEASHORE implies that h( is necessarily palindromic and must have nonnegative coefficients; this is confirmed by the formulae. Incidentally, since the coordinator polynomial for the growth series of the root lattice B n is not palindromic, our approach would need to be modified to prove the formula in the B n case. To state our main results, let A n, C n, and D n be the classical root lattices generated as monoids by M An = {e i e j : 0 i, j n + } M Cn = {±2e i : i n ; ±e i ± e j : i j n}, M Dn = {±e i ± e j : i j n}, respectively, and define the classical root polytopes P An = conv M An, P Cn = conv M Cn, and P Dn = conv M Dn to be the conve hulls of these generating sets. The f-vector of a simplicial comple Γ is given by f(γ = (f, f 0, f,..., f n where f i is the number of i-dimensional faces of Γ; by convention f =. The f and h-polynomials of Γ are defined [7] to be f Γ ( = d f i d i h Γ ( = f Γ ( = i= d f i ( d i. Theorem. Let f An (, f Cn (, and f Dn ( be the f-polynomials of any unimodular triangulations of the boundaries of the classical root polytopes. Then ( n + m f An ( = n m, m, m, n m m=0 n 2 2m ( n + m f Cn ( = n m, n + m 2m m=0 ( ( ( n 2 2m n + m n(2n m 2m n 2 f Dn ( = n m. n + m 2m n m m =0 Theorem 2. [2, 7] The coordinator polynomial of the growth series of the classical root lattices A n, C n, and D n with respect to the generating sets M An, M Cn, and M Dn is equal to the h- polynomial of any unimodular triangulation of the respective polytopes P An, P Cn, and P Dn. These polynomials are palindromic and have nonnegative coefficients. More specifically, h An ( = =0 ( n 2, h Cn( = =0 ( 2n 2, h Dn ( = i= =0 [( 2n 2 2(n n 2. Finding growth series from unimodular triangulations ( n ]. Our proof of Theorem is combinatorial, and now we show how to deduce Theorem 2 from it. First we need some definitions. The h -polynomial of a d-dimensional lattice polytope P in a lattice L is defined by + rp L t r = r>0 h P (t ( t d+. Some authors use a slightly different definition.
3 ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES 3 Theorem 3. [5, 5] If P is a d-dimensional lattice point configuration and Γ is a unimodular triangulation of P, then h conv(p (t = td h Γ ( t. For M = M An, M Cn, M Dn, we will construct an eplicit unimodular triangulation Γ M of the boundary of the root polytope P M (and of the point configuration M 0 by coning through the origin; this operation doesn t affect the h-vector. The h-polynomial of Γ M will give us the h -polynomial of P M, which equals the coordinator polynomial of L M since P M has a unimodular triangulation. The point of view of monoid algebras will also be useful. We start with the (n r-matri M = (a, a 2,..., a r whose columns generate L M R n as a monoid. We define P M to be the conve hull of these generators, namely the polytope { } r r P M = conv{a,..., a r } = p R n : p = λ i a i, λ i 0 and λ i =. In the cases we study, the polytope P M has a,..., a r and the origin as its only lattice points. Moreover, the origin is the unique interior lattice point. Motivated by this we let ( M... =. a a 2... a r 0 We also define S(M R n+ as the monoid generated by the columns of M. This monoid is contained in the rational polyhedral cone { ( ( cone(m = R u n+ r ( ( } : = λ u i + λ a r+ and λ i 0,..., λ r+ 0. i= Note that for any R >0 we have {u R n : (, u cone(m } = P M. In general, S(M cone(m Z n+, and if the two sets are equal we call S(M normal. The monoid S(M is normal if and only if {u Z n : (, u cone(m } = P M Z n for all Z >0. Now let K be any field and let K[] = K[,..., r, r+ ] be the ring of polynomials with coefficients in K. A monomial of K[] is a product of powers of variables, u = u u u r+ r+ where u = (u, u 2,..., u r+ is the eponent vector. Similarly, we let T = K[s, t, t,..., t n, t n ] be the Laurent polynomial ring where the monomials can have eponent vectors with negative coordinates (ecept in the first position. The monoid algebra K[M ] = K[st a, st a 2,..., st ar, s] is the subalgebra of T consisting of K-linear combinations of monomials s t u where (, u S(M. The ring homomorphism ψ : K[] T defined by ψ( i = st a i for i =,..., r and ψ( r+ = s is a surjection onto K[M ]. Therefore K[]/I M = K[M ] where I M, nown as the toric ideal of M, is the ernel of ψ. The monoid algebra K[M ] is graded where the degree of the monomial s t u is. The toric ideal I M is homogenous with respect to the same grading. Definition. The Hilbert series of K[M ] is the generating function i= H(K[M ]; := 0 dim(k[m ], i= where K[M ] is the K-vector space of the monomials in K[M ] of degree. The following theorem is a standard result from algebraic geometry.
4 4 FEDERICO ARDILA, MATTHIAS BECK, SERKAN HOŞTEN, JULIAN PFEIFLE, AND KIM SEASHORE Theorem 4. [9] The Hilbert series of K[M ] can be written as H(K[M ]; = h( ( d+, where h(, the h-polynomial of K[M ], is a polynomial of degree at most d = ran(m. By our construction, the set of vectors {u : s t u K[M ]} are in bijection with the set of vectors in L M with word length at most ; that is, This observation gives us the following. dim(k[m ] = S(i. Proposition 5. The h-polynomial of K[M ] is precisely the coordinator polynomial of the growth series of L M. It follows that computing the coordinator polynomials of A n, C n, and D n is equivalent to computing the h-polynomials of the corresponding monoid algebras. We will use this point of view in Section 4. Finally, we show that the h-polynomial of K[M ] is essentially the h-polynomial of any unimodular triangulation of cone(m. Theorem 6. Let Γ be a unimodular triangulation of cone(m, and denote by K[Γ] the Stanley-Reisner ring of Γ as a simplicial comple. Then H(K[M ]; = H(K[Γ]; ; hence, the h-polynomial of K[M ] is equal to t d h Γ ( t. Proof. Since Γ is unimodular, the monoid S(M is the disjoint union of all sets of the form { ( + ( } n u i : n a i N, i i σ where σ {,..., r + } is a face of Γ with σ = and u = i σ a i. This means that H(K[M ]; = σ Γ i=0 σ ( σ, and the above epression is precisely H(K[Γ];. 3. The Lattice A n We now tae a closer loo at the root lattice A n ; it is the subgroup of Z n+ given by A n = { Z n+ n i=0 i = 0 }. Proposition 7. The lattice A n is generated as a monoid by the root system of the Coeter group A n ; that is, the set of vectors M An = {e i e j : 0 i j n + }. Proof. Define = i. Any A n with > 0 must have a positive entry i and a negative entry j. Subtracting e i e j from gives the vector y = (e i e j, which is also in A n and satisfies y <. Iterating this process yields a way to write as a non-negative integer combination of M An.
5 ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES 5 The polytope P MAn is the root polytope of the lattice A n, and we will denote this polytope by P An. Each root e i e j is a verte of P An since it uniquely maimizes the functional i j. It will be convenient to let v ij = e i e j and organize these vectors in the (n + (n + matri V n whose entries are v ij for i j and 0 if i = j. Eample. The root polytope P A3 can be written as conv(v 3, the conve hull of the entries of V 3 = 0 v 0 v 02 v 03 v 0 0 v 2 v 3 v 20 v 2 0 v 23 v 30 v 3 v 32 0 The root polytope P A3 can be obtained by joining the midpoints of the edges of a cube, as shown in Figure. To see this, let a = ( 3 2, 2, 2, 2 and define a 2, a 3, a 4 analogously; these are the vertices of a regular tetrahedron centered at the origin which lies on the hyperplane = 0 of R 4. These vectors, together with their negatives, are the vertices of a 3-cube. The midpoints of the edges of this cube are the vectors 2 (a i a j = v ij. In the diagram, i, i, and ij represent a i, a i, and v ij, respectively Figure. The root polytope P A3. For a finite set A let A be the standard ( A -dimensional simple whose vertices are the unit vectors in R A. The following proposition summarizes several useful properties of the root polytope P An. Proposition 8. The polytope P An is an n-dimensional polytope in R n+ which is contained in the hyperplane H 0 = { R n+ : n i=0 i = 0}. It has (n n(n + edges, which are of
6 6 FEDERICO ARDILA, MATTHIAS BECK, SERKAN HOŞTEN, JULIAN PFEIFLE, AND KIM SEASHORE the form v ij v i and v i v j for i, j, distinct. It has 2 n+ 2 facets, which can be labelled by the proper subsets S of [0, n] := {0,,..., n}. The facet F S is defined by the hyperplane { } H S := R n+ : i =, and it is congruent to the product of simplices S T, where T = [0, n] S. The only lattice points in P An are its vertices and the origin. Proof. The first statement is clear. The edges v ij v i and v i v j are maimized by the functionals i j and i + j, respectively. To see that we cannot have an edge whose vertices are v ij and v l with i, j,, l distinct, note that v ij + v l = v il + v j ; so any linear functional f satisfies that f(v ij + f(v l = f(v il + f(v j and cannot be maimized precisely at this presumed edge. Similarly, we cannot have an edge with vertices v ij and v i since v ij + v i = v lj + v l for any l distinct from i, j,. The vertices of P An that lie on H S are those of the form v ij for i S and j / T ; these clearly form a polytope isomorphic to the product of simplices S T. Since this polytope has codimension one in P An, it is indeed a facet. Now consider any facet F of P An defined by a functional f. By the previous paragraph, every edge of F has direction of the form e i e j for some i j; and the fact that this edge lies on F implies that f(e i = f(e j. Doing this for n linearly independent edges of F, we get n independent equalities among the f(e i, showing that there can only be two different values among f(e 0,..., f(e n. Since P An lies on H 0 we can assume that the smaller value is 0, and by rescaling we can mae the larger value. It follows that F is one of the facets already described. Since P An is contained in the sphere of radius 2 centered at 0, it can only contain lattice points of the form 0, ±e i, or ±e i ± e j. Of these, the only ones on the hyperplane H 0 are the origin and the vertices of P An. Now we will construct a specific unimodular triangulation of P An (equivalently, of cone(m A n. The combinatorial structure of this triangulation will allow us to enumerate its faces. Proposition 9. [3] The matri M An is totally unimodular; i.e., every square submatri of M An has determinant 0, +, or. The same is true for M A n. Corollary 0. Let T be an arbitrary triangulation of the boundary of P An. Coning over T from the origin gives rise to a unimodular triangulation of P An 0. In light of Corollary 0 we need a triangulation of the boundary of P An. Such a triangulation will be obtained as a pulling triangulation, also nown as a reverse leicographic triangulation. Let A = {a,..., a r } be a collection of points in R n, totally ordered by a a 2 a r, and let P A be the conve hull of A. We define the faces of A to be the subsets of A that lie on the faces of the polytope P A. Definition 2. A pulling triangulation Γ pull (A is defined recursively as follows: i S If A is affinely independent, then Γ pull (A = {A}. Otherwise, Γ pull (A = {{a } G : G Γ pull (F} F where the union is taen over all facets F of A not containing a.
7 ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES 7 Definition 3. The staircase triangulation Γ of P An M An 0 under the ordering is the pulling triangulation of the set 0 v 0 v 02 v 0,n v 0 v 2 v,n v n,0 v n,n Since the origin is pulled first, Γ is the cone over a triangulation of the boundary of P An, and it suffices to understand how each facet S T of P An gets triangulated. Fortunately, the restriction of Γ to this facet is the well-understood staircase triangulation of a product of two simplices [0]. The vertices of S T correspond to the entries of the S T submatri of the matri V n, and the maimal simplices of the staircase triangulation of this facet correspond to the staircase paths that go from the top left to the bottom right corner of this submatri taing steps down and to the right. We will let Γ = Γ(P An, Γ = Γ( P An, and Γ( S T denote the staircase triangulation of P An, its restriction to the boundary P An, and its restriction to the facet S T, respectively. Eample 2. The facet F 046 = of the root polytope P A6 is the conve hull of the vertices in the following submatri of V 6 : v 0 v 02 v 03 v 05 v 4 v 42 v 43 v 45. v 6 v 62 v 63 v 65 There are 0 maimal cells in Γ( , corresponding to the ( 5 2 = 0 staircase paths from v 0 to v 65. The simple with vertices {v 0, v 02, v 42, v 43, v 45, v 65 } is one of these cells; it corresponds to the staircase v 0 v 02 v 42 v 43 v 45. v 65 The facet S T is subdivided into ( S + T 2 simplices. It follows that the number of full-dimensional simplices of Γ is f n (Γ = f n ( Γ = = S ( ( n + n The following gives a characterization of all faces of Γ. = ( 2n. n Proposition. The (m -dimensional faces of the staircase triangulation Γ are given by subsets {v i j,..., v imj m } of the set of vertices such that: ( 0 i i 2... i m n and 0 j j 2... j m n, (2 (i s, j s (i t, j t for s t, and (3 i s j t, s, t m. Proof. This is straightforward from the definitions. The third condition guarantees that v i j,..., v imjm are vertices of some (not necessarily unique facet S T, while the first two conditions guarantee that they form a subset of some staircase path in the corresponding S T submatri of V n. In the matri V n, we can see a face as a sequence of positions that ( moves wealy southeast, (2 never stagnates, and (3 never uses a row and a column of the same label. This is illustrated in Figure 2.
8 8 FEDERICO ARDILA, MATTHIAS BECK, SERKAN HOŞTEN, JULIAN PFEIFLE, AND KIM SEASHORE Figure 2. The staircase triangulation of the root polytope P A3. Theorem 2. The f-vector of the reverse leicographic triangulation Γ of the boundary of P An is given by ( n + m f m ( Γ = f m (Γ = m, m, n m for 0 m n. Proof. The problem of counting the m-faces of Γ(P An has been reduced to counting the possible choices for indices (i, j,..., (i m, j m that meet the conditions in Proposition. We find it convenient to view these as m positions in the matri V n. Consider the choices that occupy eactly a columns and b rows. There are ( n+ a,b,n+ a b choices of rows and columns satisfying condition (3. Once we have chosen these, let us focus our attention on the a b submatri that remains; condition (3 guarantees that there are no zero entries in this matri. Inside this submatri, the vertices (i, j,..., (i m, j m form a path that never moves up or to the left and touches every row and column. This path must go from the top left to the bottom right corner of the submatri using the steps (, 0, (0,, and (,. The total number of steps is m and the distances covered by the path in the horizontal and vertical directions are b and a, respectively. Therefore, the number of steps of the form (, 0, (0,, and (, must be m a, m b, and a + b m, respectively. There are ( m m a,m b,a+b m paths of this form. Figure 3 shows how to convert a partial staircase into a path from the top left to the bottom right corner of a rectangle, using steps of the form (, 0, (0, and (,. First we select
9 ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES 9 Figure 3. Going from the label of a cell of Γ to a path in a rectangle with steps (, 0, (0, and (,. the rows and columns used by the partial staircase, and delete all the other ones. The cells of the staircase form a path in the resulting rectangle. It follows that f m ( Γ = ( ( n + m a, b, n + a b m a, m b, a + b m a,b ( n + m f m ( Γ = ( ( ( n + m n + m n + n + a, b, n + a b m a, m b, a + b m a,b = ( n + m a, b, n + a b, m a, m b, a + b m a,b = ( ( ( ( n + m m m n m m, m, n m a b n + a b a,b ( ( n + m n + m = m, m, n m n + as desired. Theorem 3. The coordinator polynomial for the growth series of the lattice A n generated as a monoid by M An = {e i e j, : 0 i, j n + with i j} is h An ( = =0 ( n 2.
10 0 FEDERICO ARDILA, MATTHIAS BECK, SERKAN HOŞTEN, JULIAN PFEIFLE, AND KIM SEASHORE Proof. We first compute h Γ (. By definition h Γ ( + = f Γ (, which is ( n + m ( ( n 2n l ( ( ( n n n l n m = l = l = m, m, n m l n l n m=0 l=0 =l ( n 2 ( l l = l=0 =0 l=0 ( n 2 ( l l = l=0 =l =0 ( n 2 ( +. This shows that h Γ ( = n ( n 2 =0, and since this polynomial is palindromic we get h An ( = n h Γ ( = h Γ (. 4. The Lattice C n The root lattice C n R n is defined by C n := { Z n : i i is even}. Proposition 4. The root lattice C n is a ran n lattice generated as a monoid by the set M Cn = {±2e i : i n ; ±e i ± e j : i j n}. Proof. Consider any C n. By subtracting from it the appropriate nonnegative multiples of 2e i or 2e i, we obtain a vector y C n where each y i equals 0 or. The number of coordinates of y equal to is even, so y is a sum of vectors of the form e i + e j with i j. As in the earlier section, we define P Cn = conv(m Cn. The root polytope P Cn is the cross polytope (which we will define net dilated by a factor of two, P Cn = 2 n. Definition 4. The crosspolytope n in R n is given by the facet and verte descriptions { } n := R n : i = conv({e, e,..., e n, e n }. i= Remar. In the rest of this section we will compute the growth series of L MCn essentially by considering lattice points in the integer dilates of P Cn. However, when we say lattice points or unimodular triangulation, we mean these words with respect to the lattice L MCn. For instance, in this sense, the only interior lattice point of P Cn is the origin. In Section 5.4 we will derive a unimodular triangulation of P Cn from a triangulation of the root polytope P Dn, and use it to give a proof of Theorem 2 in the C n case. Such a triangulation is obtained from a triangulation of the facets of P Dn by forming the cone of this boundary triangulation from the origin. One can also construct a specific pulling triangulation where the origin is pulled first; for the details we refer the reader to Section 5.2 in [3]. Here we give a different proof; we start by giving a simple description of the lattice points on the faces of the root polytope P Cn. Proposition 5. The set of lattice points on any ( -face of P Cn for = 0,..., n is affinely isomorphic to the set of lattice points in the simple { } V (2, := u Z 0 : u + u u = 2. Proof. This is immediate from the fact that crosspolytopes are regular and simplicial. The Hilbert series of K[V (2, ] is given in [, Corollary 2.6] as H(K[V (2, ], = h ( ( ( = i=0 2i i (.
11 ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES Now we can compute the growth series of C n as an inclusion-eclusion count of Hilbert series of above ind for all dimensions, namely ( n j h j ( f j ( j j=0 where f j is the number of (j -dimensional faces of the cross polytope n. Using the duality ( between the cross polytope and the n-dimensional hypercube we now that f j = n j 2 j. Substituting this in the above series and writing with a common denominator we get ( n ( n ( n j ( n j n j j=0 2 j j i=0 ( j i. 2i The numerator of this series is the coordinator polynomial we are after, and note that this polynomial consists of the whole power terms of ( n ( n j ( n j 2 j ( + j. n j j=0 Using the binomial theorem, the above polynomial is equal to (( + (2 + 2 n = ( + 2n. This leads us to our main theorem in this section. Theorem 6. The coordinator polynomial for the lattice C n generated as a monoid by the standard generators M Cn = {±e i ± e j : i, j n} is given by ( 2n h Cn ( =. 2 =0 From this, we use the method of Theorem 3 to etract the corresponding f-polynomial n 2 2m ( n + m f Cn ( = n m n + m 2m proving the statement in Theorem. m=0 5. The lattice D n The root lattice D n is defined by D n := { Z n : i i is even}. Note that this lattice is the same as C n. The only difference is in the set of generators. Proposition 7. The root lattice D n is generated by M Dn = {±e i ± e j : i j n} as a monoid. Proof. Observe that 2e i = (e i + e j + (e i e j and invoe Proposition 4. Let 2,n = conv{e i + e j : i j n} be the (n -dimensional second hypersimple in R n. Proposition 8. The root polytope P Dn = conv M Dn has dimension n, 2n(n vertices, 2 n hypersimple facets 2,n, and 2n cross-polytope facets n.
12 2 FEDERICO ARDILA, MATTHIAS BECK, SERKAN HOŞTEN, JULIAN PFEIFLE, AND KIM SEASHORE Proof. The first two statements are immediate. Net, we claim that the facet-defining inequalities come in two families, d i= σ i i 2 and σ i i, where σ i {±}. To verify that they all describe facets of P Dn, it suffices to consider the case σ i = for all i. The vertices in P Dn with + + d = 2 are just the permutations of (,, 0,..., 0, which by definition are the vertices of 2,n. For the second family, we can additionally assume i =, so that the set of vertices in P Dn satisfying = is eactly (, ±, 0,..., 0,..., (, 0,..., 0, ±, the set of vertices of an (n -dimensional cross-polytope n. Convincing ourselves that we didn t miss any facets of P Dn can be done directly, but it also follows quicly using the fact that P Dn arises from the Wythoff construction [8] associated to the following diagram: 4 We can read off the facets of P Dn from this diagram by forming connected subgraphs with n vertices that contain the ringed node. There are eactly two such subgraphs, corresponding to cross-polytopes n and hypersimplices n,2, respectively. The counting method detailed in [8] now assures us that we have accounted for all facets of P Dn. To calculate the generating function of the f-vector of our triangulation triang P Dn of the boundary of P Dn, we split triang P Dn = triang P Dn,total int n triang P Dn,total 2,n into the disjoint union of all faces in the interior of a cross-polytope facet, respectively all faces contained in a hypersimple facet. 5.. Triangulating the cross-polytope facets. We start with triang P Dn,total int n. Since cross-polytopes are simplicial, the way in which we choose to triangulate them will not affect the triangulations of the hypersimple facets, and the entire boundary of the cross-polytope will be contained in the triangulation. More precisely, there are ( m faces of dimension in the boundary comple of an m-dimensional cross-polytope; we include the empty face by allowing =. These numbers assemble into the generating function f m ( = m = ( m 2 + = + m =0 ( m (2 = ( + 2m. We now etend the boundary to a unimodular triangulation of n. However, just as in Section 4, we must be careful to only use lattice points from our root lattice; for D n this means that we must eclude the centroid of each n from the triangulation, because it has odd coordinate sum. Instead, setting m = n, we need to triangulate the interior of m without using any new vertices. There is still not much choice in the matter, since all such triangulations are combinatorially isomorphic; they are determined by the choice of a diagonal connecting two opposite vertices, say v 2m and v 2m. The faces of the triangulation of m are then either faces of the boundary m, or joins {v 2m, v 2m } F, where F is a face of the equatorial m. Here we include the case F =, which we tae to yield the diagonal conv{v 2m, v 2m } itself. However, we eclude the faces in the boundary m from our count, because these will
13 ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES 3 be included in the generating function of the triangulation of the hypersimple facets. Thus, the f-vector of interior faces of our triangulation of n is f int n ( = 2 f n 2 ( = ( + 2 n 2, and these values assemble into the following generating function for the number of interior faces of n : Because P Dn F int n (z, = f int n (z n = ( + 2 n 2 z n z 2 = 2z + z. n 2 n 2 has 2n cross-polytope facets, we obtain the total count of such interior faces as F Dn,total int n (z, = 2z z F int n (z, = 2z2 (2z + z 2 (2z + z 2. For the f-vector, this means ( f total int n n 2 = n 2. Note that there is no double-counting here, because the interior faces of the triangulations of the cross-polytope facets are disjoint Triangulating the hypersimple facets. Our net job is to calculate the number f (D n, total 2,n of -dimensional faces of a unimodular triangulation of the hypersimple facets of P Dn. The unimodular triangulation of the hypersimple 2,n that we will use has an interesting history. Two such triangulations were constructed independently by Stanley [4] in 977 and by Sturmfels [6] in 996. However, in 2006, Lam and Postniov [2] showed that these triangulations are in fact the same, and gave two more independent descriptions. Let f (n count the number of -faces of this standard triangulation of the (n - dimensional hypersimple 2,n. These numbers were calculated by Lam and Postniov, and are given implicitly in [2, Remar 5.4] via the generating function ( F (z, = n 2 = z n n =0 f (n z 2 z + ( + z(z + 2 (z + z 2( ( + z(z 2 + = z 2 + ( z 3 + ( z 4 + O(z 5. Some remars are in order here: First, we have removed a factor from the formula in [2, Remar 5.4], because Lam and Postniov s normalization of the f-vector is different from ours. Secondly, in this subsection we do not include a count for the empty face in our generating functions, because we want to combine triangulations into larger ones, but prefer not to be bothered by the fact that each triangulation has a unique empty face; we will remedy this starting from Section 5.3. And finally, note that the z 2 term in the formula corresponds to the unique 0-dimensional face of (2, 2. These remars out of the way, we count the number of ( 0-dimensional faces of triang P Dn,total 2,n by an inclusion-eclusion argument, maing use of the following two facts: For, each -dimensional face of a hypersimple is again a hypersimple; and for n 3
14 4 FEDERICO ARDILA, MATTHIAS BECK, SERKAN HOŞTEN, JULIAN PFEIFLE, AND KIM SEASHORE each hypersimple facet of P Dn is adjacent to eactly n other hypersimple facets. (There is an additional oddity for n = 3, in that it remains true that each of the 8 triangles (3, 2 in P D3 is adjacent to eactly 3 other ones, but the adjacency happens via vertices, not codimension faces. The count must start out 2 n f (n, but then we have overcounted the -faces in the intersections of two hypersimple facets. For each such intersection, we must subtract f (n, so it remains to calculate the number of such adjacencies of hypersimple facets. Without loss of generality, we can assume one of the hypersimple facets to lie in the hyperplane n i= i = a, = 2, where a = (,..., is the all- vector. This facet F is adjacent to n other hypersimple facets F,..., F n, namely the ones defined by the normal vectors obtained from a by changing eactly one to. A normal vector that selects the (n 2- dimensional hypersimple F F j is obtained from a by setting the j-th entry to 0. For i with i n 2, any (n i-dimensional hypersimple that is the intersection of i hypersimple facets of P Dn lies in the hyperplane a, = 2, where a is a vector with i entries 0 and the remaining n i + entries either + or. Since there are ( n i 2 n i+ such vectors, we obtain (2 f (D n, total 2,n = n 2 ( n ( i i i= = ( n ( j j j 0 2 n j f (n j. 2 n i+ f (n i+ Note that the last sum only runs up to n because f (l = 0 for > l. Let s discuss some special cases: The sum (2 is also valid for n = 3; for i n because f (l = 0 for l and all ; and for i = n (the case of edges because f (2 0 = is the only nonzero value of f (2, so that f 0 (D n, total 2,n is the only affected term; but the number of vertices wors out correctly. This comes about because f 0 ( 2,n = ( n f 0 (D n, total 2,n = j 0 ( j ( n j ( n j 2 n 2 2 the correct number of vertices. We proceed to calculate the corresponding generating functions: f Dn,total 2,n ( = = n f (D n, total 2,n =0 n ( n ( i i i=0 2 n i n i =0 2, so that = 2n(n, f (n i n ( n = ( i 2 n i f (n i ( i i=0 ( n = ( n ( 2 i f (i (, i i=
15 ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES 5 and F Dn,total 2,n (z, = n 2 f Dn,total 2,n (z n = ( 2 i f (i ( i n i = i = = = + z (2z i ( + z i+ f (i ( + z F ( z n ( n i ( 2z i f (i ( + z i ( 2z + z, 4z 2 (z 2 4z ( 2z( + (2z + z 2 z where F (z, = i 0 f (i (z i is the generating function of the f-vectors of triangulations of the second hypersimple from (; note that f (0 ( = f ( ( = The total generating function. It remains to combine the two previous generating functions: F triang PDn (z, = F Dn,total int n (z, + F Dn,total 2,n (z, + z n, where the last term corresponds to a count for the empty face in each dimension. We could now etract the f-vector via a routine calculation; however, it will be easier to do this with the h-vector in hand. For this, we form a unimodular triangulation of the interior of P Dn by coning over triang P Dn from the origin. However, since we are interested only in the h-vector of the resulting triangulation, we can use two well-nown properties of h-polynomials to simplify things. Namely, the h-polynomial h 2 ( = h 2 of the join of two simplicial complees equals the product h h 2 of the individual h-polynomials; moreover, the h-polynomial of a point is h {0} =. Thus, h = h (triang PDn {0} = h triang PDn, and it suffices to calculate the h-polynomial corresponding to triang P Dn. For this, we need to re-inde each polynomial [z n ]F triang PDn (z, = f i i to read instead n i=0 f i n i ; we achieve this by setting F triang PDn (z, = ( F triang P Dn z,. i=0, n 2
16 6 FEDERICO ARDILA, MATTHIAS BECK, SERKAN HOŞTEN, JULIAN PFEIFLE, AND KIM SEASHORE Since h ( = f (, we obtain the generating function for the h-polynomials as H D (z, = F triang PDn (z, = z 2 ( + 2 3( + ( + 2 z + (3 + 2 ( z 2 ( 2 ( + ( + 2 z 3 (z + z 2 ( 2z( + + z 2 ( 2 ( = z2 2 ( z + 4 ( 2 ( z + 2z2 (z + z ( (z + z 2 + ( 2 = z 2 + ( z 3 + ( z 4 + ( z 5 + O(z 6. It is now straightforward to chec that H D (z, = n 2 p n(z n is the generating function for Colin Mallows s formula conjectured in Conway and Sloane [6]: p n ( = ( + 2n + ( 2n 2n( + n 2, 2 and from this we etract the f-vector stated in Theorem without too much difficulty The growth series of C n : reprise. We are now in a position to give a triangulationtheoretic derivation of the growth series of C n. For this, notice from the description in Section 4 that the lattice points in P Cn are the vertices of P Dn, together with the vertices of 2 n. We can therefore build a unimodular triangulation of the boundary of P Cn by starting from our unimodular triangulation of P Dn. However, instead of triangulating the 2n crosspolytope facets, we cone over each such facet F from the corresponding verte v F of 2 n. By projecting v F into the barycenter of F, we see that counting the number of up to (n - dimensional faces added by each coning operation amounts to counting the total number of interior faces in the triangulation of n obtained by coning over the origin. These numbers, in turn, are encoded in the generating function ( f int({0} n ( = f n ( + = ( + 2 n. As before, the faces corresponding to the cones over different cross-polytope facets are disjoint, so that their total number is counted by the generating function F Cn,total n (z, = 2z ( + 2 n z n = 2(2 + z2 (2z + z 2 z (2z + z 2. n 2 Combining generating functions as before, we obtain ( H C (z, = F Cn,total n (z(, + F Dn,total n,2 (z(, + ( n 2 (z( n.
17 ROOT POLYTOPES AND GROWTH SERIES OF ROOT LATTICES 7 H C (z, = z ( 2 ( + z 2( + z + ( 2 z 2 ( = z 2 + ( z 3 + ( z 4 + ( z 5 + O(z 6. Again, it is easily checed that H C (z, = n 2 p n(z n with ( 2n p n ( =. 2 =0 References. M. Baae and U. Grimm, Coordination sequences for root lattices and related graphs, Z. Krist. 22 (997, no. 4, Roland Bacher, Pierre de la Harpe, and Boris Venov, Séries de croissance et séries d Ehrhart associées au réseau de racines, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 325 (997, no., Matthias Bec and Seran Hoşten, Cyclotomic polytopes and growth series of cyclotomic lattices, Math. Res. Lett. 3 (2006, no. 4, M. Benson, Growth series of finite etensions of Z n are rational, Invent. Math. 73 (983, no. 2, U. Bete and P. McMullen, Lattice points in lattice polytopes, Mh. Math. 99 (985, John H. Conway and Neil J. A. Sloane, The cell structures of certain lattices, Miscellanea mathematica, Springer, Berlin, 99, pp , Low-dimensional lattices. VII. Coordination sequences, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 453 (997, no. 966, H. S. M. Coeter, Regular polytopes, third ed., Dover Publications Inc., New Yor, David Eisenbud, Commutative algebra,with a view toward algebraic geometry, Graduate Tets in Mathematics, vol. 50, Springer-Verlag, New Yor, Israel M. Gelfand, Mihail M. Kapranov, and Andrei V. Zelevinsy, Discriminants, resultants, and multidimensional determinants, Birhäuser, Mordechai Katzman, The Hilbert series of algebras of the Veronese type, Comm. Algebra 33 (2005, no. 4, T. Lam and A. Postniov, Alcoved polytopes I, arxiv:math.co/050246v2, Kimberly Seashore, Using polytopes to derive growth series for classical root lattices, Masters Thesis, San Francisco State University, Richard Stanley, Eulerian partitions of a unit hypercube., Higher Comb., Proc. NATO Adv. Study Inst., Berlin (West 976, 49 (977., , Decompositions of rational conve polytopes, Annals of Discrete Math. 6 (980, Bernd Sturmfels, Gröbner bases and conve polytopes, University Lecture Series, vol. 8, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, Günter M. Ziegler, Lectures on polytopes, Graduate Tets in Mathematics, vol. 52, Springer-Verlag, New Yor, address: federico@math.sfsu.edu, bec@math.sfsu.edu, seran@math.sfsu.edu Department of Mathematics, San Francisco State University. address: julian.pfeifle@upc.edu Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada II, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. address: seashore@sfsu.edu SESAME (Graduate group in Math and Science Education, Univ. of California, Bereley.
Cyclotomic Polytopes and Growth Series of Cyclotomic Lattices. Matthias Beck & Serkan Hoşten San Francisco State University
Cyclotomic Polytopes and Growth Series of Cyclotomic Lattices Matthias Beck & Serkan Hoşten San Francisco State University math.sfsu.edu/beck Math Research Letters Growth Series of Lattices L R d lattice
More informationClassification of Ehrhart quasi-polynomials of half-integral polygons
Classification of Ehrhart quasi-polynomials of half-integral polygons A thesis presented to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfilment of The Requirements for The Degree Master
More informationA combinatorial proof of a formula for Betti numbers of a stacked polytope
A combinatorial proof of a formula for Betti numbers of a staced polytope Suyoung Choi Department of Mathematical Sciences KAIST, Republic of Korea choisy@aistacr (Current Department of Mathematics Osaa
More informationMATH 890 HOMEWORK 2 DAVID MEREDITH
MATH 890 HOMEWORK 2 DAVID MEREDITH (1) Suppose P and Q are polyhedra. Then P Q is a polyhedron. Moreover if P and Q are polytopes then P Q is a polytope. The facets of P Q are either F Q where F is a facet
More informationCREPANT RESOLUTIONS OF GORENSTEIN TORIC SINGULARITIES AND UPPER BOUND THEOREM. Dimitrios I. Dais
Séminaires & Congrès 6, 2002, p. 187 192 CREPANT RESOLUTIONS OF GORENSTEIN TORIC SINGULARITIES AND UPPER BOUND THEOREM by Dimitrios I. Dais Abstract. A necessary condition for the existence of torus-equivariant
More informationAutomorphism Groups of Cyclic Polytopes
8 Automorphism Groups of Cyclic Polytopes (Volker Kaibel and Arnold Waßmer ) It is probably well-known to most polytope theorists that the combinatorial automorphism group of a cyclic d-polytope with n
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 25 Sep 2015
A BASIS FOR SLICING BIRKHOFF POLYTOPES TREVOR GLYNN arxiv:1509.07597v1 [math.co] 25 Sep 2015 Abstract. We present a change of basis that may allow more efficient calculation of the volumes of Birkhoff
More informationInterval-Vector Polytopes
Interval-Vector Polytopes Jessica De Silva Gabriel Dorfsman-Hopkins California State University, Stanislaus Dartmouth College Joseph Pruitt California State University, Long Beach July 28, 2012 Abstract
More informationFACES OF CONVEX SETS
FACES OF CONVEX SETS VERA ROSHCHINA Abstract. We remind the basic definitions of faces of convex sets and their basic properties. For more details see the classic references [1, 2] and [4] for polytopes.
More informationSTANLEY S SIMPLICIAL POSET CONJECTURE, AFTER M. MASUDA
Communications in Algebra, 34: 1049 1053, 2006 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0092-7872 print/1532-4125 online DOI: 10.1080/00927870500442005 STANLEY S SIMPLICIAL POSET CONJECTURE, AFTER M.
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.co] 24 Aug 2016
Slicing and dicing polytopes arxiv:1608.05372v2 [math.co] 24 Aug 2016 Patrik Norén June 23, 2018 Abstract Using tropical convexity Dochtermann, Fink, and Sanyal proved that regular fine mixed subdivisions
More informationGeometry. Every Simplicial Polytope with at Most d + 4 Vertices Is a Quotient of a Neighborly Polytope. U. H. Kortenkamp. 1.
Discrete Comput Geom 18:455 462 (1997) Discrete & Computational Geometry 1997 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Every Simplicial Polytope with at Most d + 4 Vertices Is a Quotient of a Neighborly Polytope
More informationarxiv: v1 [cs.cc] 30 Jun 2017
On the Complexity of Polytopes in LI( Komei Fuuda May Szedlá July, 018 arxiv:170610114v1 [cscc] 30 Jun 017 Abstract In this paper we consider polytopes given by systems of n inequalities in d variables,
More informationOn the Number of Tilings of a Square by Rectangles
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects University of Tennessee Honors Program 5-2012 On the Number of Tilings
More information4. Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
MATH41071/MATH61071 Algebraic topology Autumn Semester 2017 2018 4. Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology Geometric simplicial complexes 4.1 Definition. A finite subset { v 0, v 1,..., v r } R n
More informationDiscrete Volume Computations. for Polyhedra
Digital Discrete Volume Computations y for Polyhedra 20 Matthias Beck San Francisco State University math.sfsu.edu/beck DGCI 2016 5 x z 2 Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer,
More informationTHE REFLEXIVE DIMENSION OF A LATTICE POLYTOPE
DUKE-CGTP-04-07 THE REFLEXIVE DIMENSION OF A LATTICE POLYTOPE CHRISTIAN HAASE AND ILARION V. MELNIKOV Abstract. The reflexive dimension refldim(p ) of a lattice polytope P is the minimal d so that P is
More informationON CELLULAR RESOLUTION OF MONOMIAL IDEALS
ON CELLULAR RESOLUTION OF MONOMIAL IDEALS THE WORKSHOP ON COMPUTATIONAL DIFFERENTIAL ALGEBRA AND RELATED TOPICS SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS, IPM JUNE 21-25, 2014 TEHRAN, IRAN RAHIM ZAARE-NAHANDI, UNIVERSITY
More informationThe strong chromatic number of a graph
The strong chromatic number of a graph Noga Alon Abstract It is shown that there is an absolute constant c with the following property: For any two graphs G 1 = (V, E 1 ) and G 2 = (V, E 2 ) on the same
More informationMonotone Paths in Geometric Triangulations
Monotone Paths in Geometric Triangulations Adrian Dumitrescu Ritankar Mandal Csaba D. Tóth November 19, 2017 Abstract (I) We prove that the (maximum) number of monotone paths in a geometric triangulation
More information2017 SOLUTIONS (PRELIMINARY VERSION)
SIMON MARAIS MATHEMATICS COMPETITION 07 SOLUTIONS (PRELIMINARY VERSION) This document will be updated to include alternative solutions provided by contestants, after the competition has been mared. Problem
More informationTADEUSZ JANUSZKIEWICZ AND MICHAEL JOSWIG
CONVEX GEOMETRY RELATED TO HAMILTONIAN GROUP ACTIONS TADEUSZ JANUSZKIEWICZ AND MICHAEL JOSWIG Abstract. Exercises and descriptions of student projects for a BMS/IMPAN block course. Berlin, November 27
More informationTHE BASIC THEORY OF PERSISTENT HOMOLOGY
THE BASIC THEORY OF PERSISTENT HOMOLOGY KAIRUI GLEN WANG Abstract Persistent homology has widespread applications in computer vision and image analysis This paper first motivates the use of persistent
More informationTriangulations of Simplicial Polytopes
Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie Contributions to Algebra and Geometry Volume 45 (004), No. 1, 37-46. Triangulations of Simplicial Polytopes Peter McMullen University College London Gower Street, London
More informationPolytopes Course Notes
Polytopes Course Notes Carl W. Lee Department of Mathematics University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506 lee@ms.uky.edu Fall 2013 i Contents 1 Polytopes 1 1.1 Convex Combinations and V-Polytopes.....................
More informationA TESSELLATION FOR ALGEBRAIC SURFACES IN CP 3
A TESSELLATION FOR ALGEBRAIC SURFACES IN CP 3 ANDREW J. HANSON AND JI-PING SHA In this paper we present a systematic and explicit algorithm for tessellating the algebraic surfaces (real 4-manifolds) F
More informationInstitutionen för matematik, KTH.
Institutionen för matematik, KTH. Chapter 10 projective toric varieties and polytopes: definitions 10.1 Introduction Tori varieties are algebraic varieties related to the study of sparse polynomials.
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 15 Dec 2009
ANOTHER PROOF OF THE FACT THAT POLYHEDRAL CONES ARE FINITELY GENERATED arxiv:092.2927v [math.co] 5 Dec 2009 VOLKER KAIBEL Abstract. In this note, we work out a simple inductive proof showing that every
More informationConvex Geometry arising in Optimization
Convex Geometry arising in Optimization Jesús A. De Loera University of California, Davis Berlin Mathematical School Summer 2015 WHAT IS THIS COURSE ABOUT? Combinatorial Convexity and Optimization PLAN
More informationACTUALLY DOING IT : an Introduction to Polyhedral Computation
ACTUALLY DOING IT : an Introduction to Polyhedral Computation Jesús A. De Loera Department of Mathematics Univ. of California, Davis http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/ deloera/ 1 What is a Convex Polytope? 2
More informationSIMION S TYPE B ASSOCIAHEDRON IS A PULLING TRIANGULATION OF THE LEGENDRE POLYTOPE
SIMION S TYPE B ASSOCIAHEDRON IS A PULLING TRIANGULATION OF THE LEGENDRE POLYTOPE RICHARD EHRENBORG, GÁBOR HETYEI AND MARGARET READDY Abstract. We show that the Simion type B associahedron is combinatorially
More informationNoncrossing sets and a Graßmann associahedron
Noncrossing sets and a Graßmann associahedron Francisco Santos, Christian Stump, Volkmar Welker (in partial rediscovering work of T. K. Petersen, P. Pylyavskyy, and D. E. Speyer, 2008) (in partial rediscovering
More informationPOLYTOPES. Grünbaum and Shephard [40] remarked that there were three developments which foreshadowed the modern theory of convex polytopes.
POLYTOPES MARGARET A. READDY 1. Lecture I: Introduction to Polytopes and Face Enumeration Grünbaum and Shephard [40] remarked that there were three developments which foreshadowed the modern theory of
More informationLECTURE 1 Basic definitions, the intersection poset and the characteristic polynomial
R. STANLEY, HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS LECTURE Basic definitions, the intersection poset and the characteristic polynomial.. Basic definitions The following notation is used throughout for certain sets of
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 12 Dec 2017
arxiv:1712.04381v1 [math.co] 12 Dec 2017 Semi-reflexive polytopes Tiago Royer Abstract The Ehrhart function L P(t) of a polytope P is usually defined only for integer dilation arguments t. By allowing
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gr] 19 Dec 2018
GROWTH SERIES OF CAT(0) CUBICAL COMPLEXES arxiv:1812.07755v1 [math.gr] 19 Dec 2018 BORIS OKUN AND RICHARD SCOTT Abstract. Let X be a CAT(0) cubical complex. The growth series of X at x is G x (t) = y V
More informationSIMION S TYPE B ASSOCIAHEDRON IS A PULLING TRIANGULATION OF THE LEGENDRE POLYTOPE
SIMION S TYPE B ASSOCIAHEDRON IS A PULLING TRIANGULATION OF THE LEGENDRE POLYTOPE RICHARD EHRENBORG, GÁBOR HETYEI AND MARGARET READDY Abstract. We show that Simion s type B associahedron is combinatorially
More informationThe space of tropically collinear points is shellable
Collect. Math. 60, (2009), 63 77 c 2009 Universitat de Barcelona The space of tropically collinear points is shellable Hannah Markwig University of Michigan, Department of Mathematics, 2074 East Hall 530
More informationFURTHER APPLICATIONS OF CLUTTER DOMINATION PARAMETERS TO PROJECTIVE DIMENSION
FURTHER APPLICATIONS OF CLUTTER DOMINATION PARAMETERS TO PROJECTIVE DIMENSION HAILONG DAO AND JAY SCHWEIG Abstract. We study the relationship between the projective dimension of a squarefree monomial ideal
More informationThe important function we will work with is the omega map ω, which we now describe.
20 MARGARET A. READDY 3. Lecture III: Hyperplane arrangements & zonotopes; Inequalities: a first look 3.1. Zonotopes. Recall that a zonotope Z can be described as the Minkowski sum of line segments: Z
More informationProposition 1. The edges of an even graph can be split (partitioned) into cycles, no two of which have an edge in common.
Math 3116 Dr. Franz Rothe June 5, 2012 08SUM\3116_2012t1.tex Name: Use the back pages for extra space 1 Solution of Test 1.1 Eulerian graphs Proposition 1. The edges of an even graph can be split (partitioned)
More informationThe orientability of small covers and coloring simple polytopes. Nishimura, Yasuzo; Nakayama, Hisashi. Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 42(1) P.243-P.
Title Author(s) The orientability of small covers and coloring simple polytopes Nishimura, Yasuzo; Nakayama, Hisashi Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 42(1) P.243-P.256 Issue Date 2005-03 Text Version
More informationRATIONAL CURVES ON SMOOTH CUBIC HYPERSURFACES. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. The proof of Theorem References 9
RATIONAL CURVES ON SMOOTH CUBIC HYPERSURFACES IZZET COSKUN AND JASON STARR Abstract. We prove that the space of rational curves of a fixed degree on any smooth cubic hypersurface of dimension at least
More informationPACKING DIGRAPHS WITH DIRECTED CLOSED TRAILS
PACKING DIGRAPHS WITH DIRECTED CLOSED TRAILS PAUL BALISTER Abstract It has been shown [Balister, 2001] that if n is odd and m 1,, m t are integers with m i 3 and t i=1 m i = E(K n) then K n can be decomposed
More informationBasic Properties The Definition of Catalan Numbers
1 Basic Properties 1.1. The Definition of Catalan Numbers There are many equivalent ways to define Catalan numbers. In fact, the main focus of this monograph is the myriad combinatorial interpretations
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 27 Feb 2015
Mode Poset Probability Polytopes Guido Montúfar 1 and Johannes Rauh 2 arxiv:1503.00572v1 [math.co] 27 Feb 2015 1 Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Inselstraße 22, 04103 Leipzig, Germany,
More informationOrthogonal art galleries with holes: a coloring proof of Aggarwal s Theorem
Orthogonal art galleries with holes: a coloring proof of Aggarwal s Theorem Pawe l Żyliński Institute of Mathematics University of Gdańsk, 8095 Gdańsk, Poland pz@math.univ.gda.pl Submitted: Sep 9, 005;
More informationThe Fibonacci hypercube
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS Volume 40 (2008), Pages 187 196 The Fibonacci hypercube Fred J. Rispoli Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Dowling College, Oakdale, NY 11769 U.S.A. Steven
More informationClassification of smooth Fano polytopes
Classification of smooth Fano polytopes Mikkel Øbro PhD thesis Advisor: Johan Peder Hansen September 2007 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science University of Aarhus Introduction This
More informationFinding Small Triangulations of Polytope Boundaries Is Hard
Discrete Comput Geom 24:503 517 (2000) DOI: 10.1007/s004540010052 Discrete & Computational Geometry 2000 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Finding Small Triangulations of Polytope Boundaries Is Hard J. Richter-Gebert
More information4 Linear Programming (LP) E. Amaldi -- Foundations of Operations Research -- Politecnico di Milano 1
4 Linear Programming (LP) E. Amaldi -- Foundations of Operations Research -- Politecnico di Milano 1 Definition: A Linear Programming (LP) problem is an optimization problem: where min f () s.t. X n the
More informationL-CONVEX-CONCAVE SETS IN REAL PROJECTIVE SPACE AND L-DUALITY
MOSCOW MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL Volume 3, Number 3, July September 2003, Pages 1013 1037 L-CONVEX-CONCAVE SETS IN REAL PROJECTIVE SPACE AND L-DUALITY A. KHOVANSKII AND D. NOVIKOV Dedicated to Vladimir Igorevich
More informationCrossing Families. Abstract
Crossing Families Boris Aronov 1, Paul Erdős 2, Wayne Goddard 3, Daniel J. Kleitman 3, Michael Klugerman 3, János Pach 2,4, Leonard J. Schulman 3 Abstract Given a set of points in the plane, a crossing
More informationChordal Graphs and Minimal Free Resolutions
Chordal Graphs and Minimal Free Resolutions David J. Marchette David A. Johannsen Abstract The problem of computing the minimal free resolution of the edge ideal of a graph has attracted quite a bit of
More informationDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Convex Analysis and Economic Theory Winter Separation theorems
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Ec 181 KC Border Convex Analysis and Economic Theory Winter 2018 Topic 8: Separation theorems 8.1 Hyperplanes and half spaces Recall that a hyperplane in
More informationTHE HYPERDETERMINANT AND TRIANGULATIONS OF THE 4-CUBE
MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION Volume 77, Number 263, July 2008, Pages 1653 1679 S 0025-5718(08)02073-5 Article electronically published on February 4, 2008 THE HYPERDETERMINANT AND TRIANGULATIONS OF THE 4-CUBE
More informationOn Valuations, the Characteristic Polynomial, and Complex Subspace Arrangements
Advances in Mathematics 134, 3242 (1998) Article No. AI971693 On Valuations, the Characteristic Polynomial, and Complex Subspace Arrangements Richard Ehrenborg and Margaret A. Readdy Department of Mathematics,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.at] 8 Jan 2015
HOMOLOGY GROUPS OF SIMPLICIAL COMPLEMENTS: A NEW PROOF OF HOCHSTER THEOREM arxiv:1501.01787v1 [math.at] 8 Jan 2015 JUN MA, FEIFEI FAN AND XIANGJUN WANG Abstract. In this paper, we consider homology groups
More informationTROPICAL CONVEXITY MIKE DEVELIN AND BERND STURMFELS
TROPICAL CONVEXITY MIKE DEVELIN AND BERND STURMFELS Abstract. The notions of convexity and convex polytopes are introduced in the setting of tropical geometry. Combinatorial types of tropical polytopes
More informationToric Cohomological Rigidity of Simple Convex Polytopes
Toric Cohomological Rigidity of Simple Convex Polytopes Dong Youp Suh (KAIST) The Second East Asian Conference on Algebraic Topology National University of Singapore December 15-19, 2008 1/ 28 This talk
More informationLecture 2 - Introduction to Polytopes
Lecture 2 - Introduction to Polytopes Optimization and Approximation - ENS M1 Nicolas Bousquet 1 Reminder of Linear Algebra definitions Let x 1,..., x m be points in R n and λ 1,..., λ m be real numbers.
More informationThe Construction of a Hyperbolic 4-Manifold with a Single Cusp, Following Kolpakov and Martelli. Christopher Abram
The Construction of a Hyperbolic 4-Manifold with a Single Cusp, Following Kolpakov and Martelli by Christopher Abram A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Master of
More informationOn the Hardness of Computing Intersection, Union and Minkowski Sum of Polytopes
On the Hardness of Computing Intersection, Union and Minkowski Sum of Polytopes Hans Raj Tiwary hansraj@cs.uni-sb.de FR Informatik Universität des Saarlandes D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany Tel: +49 681 3023235
More informationLecture 3A: Generalized associahedra
Lecture 3A: Generalized associahedra Nathan Reading NC State University Cluster Algebras and Cluster Combinatorics MSRI Summer Graduate Workshop, August 2011 Introduction Associahedron and cyclohedron
More informationLOWER BOUNDS FOR SIMPLICIAL COVERS AND TRIANGULATIONS OF CUBES
LOWER BOUNDS FOR SIMPLICIAL COVERS AND TRIANGULATIONS OF CUBES ADAM BLISS AND FRANCIS EDWARD SU Abstract. We show that the size of a minimal simplicial cover of a polytope P is a lower bound for the size
More informationOn the Size of Higher-Dimensional Triangulations
Combinatorial and Computational Geometry MSRI Publications Volume 52, 2005 On the Size of Higher-Dimensional Triangulations PETER BRASS Abstract. I show that there are sets of n points in three dimensions,
More informationTORIC VARIETIES JOAQUÍN MORAGA
TORIC VARIETIES Abstract. This is a very short introduction to some concepts around toric varieties, some of the subsections are intended for more experienced algebraic geometers. To see a lot of exercises
More informationA Generalization of the Catalan Numbers
2 3 47 6 23 Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol 6 (203, Article 368 A Generalization of the Catalan Numbers Reza Kahkeshani Department of Pure Mathematics Faculty of Mathematical Sciences University of Kashan
More informationSEQUENTIALLY COHEN-MACAULAY GRAPHS OF FORM θ n1,...,n k. Communicated by Siamak Yassemi. 1. Introduction
Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 36 No. 2 (2010), pp 109-118. SEQUENTIALLY COHEN-MACAULAY GRAPHS OF FORM θ n1,...,n k F. MOHAMMADI* AND D. KIANI Communicated by Siamak Yassemi Abstract.
More informationOn the Partial Sum of the Laplacian Eigenvalues of Abstract Simplicial Complexes
On the Partial Sum of the Laplacian Eigenvalues of Abstract Simplicial Complexes Rediet Abebe and Joshua Pfeffer Abstract We present progress made in showing the generalized Grone-Merris conjecture for
More information4.2 Simplicial Homology Groups
4.2. SIMPLICIAL HOMOLOGY GROUPS 93 4.2 Simplicial Homology Groups 4.2.1 Simplicial Complexes Let p 0, p 1,... p k be k + 1 points in R n, with k n. We identify points in R n with the vectors that point
More informationChapter 4 Concepts from Geometry
Chapter 4 Concepts from Geometry An Introduction to Optimization Spring, 2014 Wei-Ta Chu 1 Line Segments The line segment between two points and in R n is the set of points on the straight line joining
More informationNegative Numbers in Combinatorics: Geometrical and Algebraic Perspectives
Negative Numbers in Combinatorics: Geometrical and Algebraic Perspectives James Propp (UMass Lowell) June 29, 2012 Slides for this talk are on-line at http://jamespropp.org/msri-up12.pdf 1 / 99 I. Equal
More informationOn Combinatorial Properties of Linear Program Digraphs
On Combinatorial Properties of Linear Program Digraphs David Avis Computer Science and GERAD McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada avis@cs.mcgill.ca Sonoko Moriyama Institute for Nano Quantum Information
More informationA PROOF OF THE LOWER BOUND CONJECTURE FOR CONVEX POLYTOPES
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 46, No. 2, 1973 A PROOF OF THE LOWER BOUND CONJECTURE FOR CONVEX POLYTOPES DAVID BARNETTE A d polytope is defined to be a cz-dimensional set that is the convex hull
More information3 No-Wait Job Shops with Variable Processing Times
3 No-Wait Job Shops with Variable Processing Times In this chapter we assume that, on top of the classical no-wait job shop setting, we are given a set of processing times for each operation. We may select
More informationPacific Journal of Mathematics
Pacific Journal of Mathematics SIMPLIFYING TRIANGULATIONS OF S 3 Aleksandar Mijatović Volume 208 No. 2 February 2003 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 208, No. 2, 2003 SIMPLIFYING TRIANGULATIONS OF S
More informationNowhere-Zero k-flows on Graphs
Nowhere-Zero k-flows on Graphs Alyssa Cuyjet Gordon Rojas Kirby Trinity College Stanford University Molly Stubblefield Western Oregon University August 3, 202 Abstract A flow on an oriented graph Γ is
More informationarxiv: v4 [math.co] 11 Apr 2016
ENUMERATING POLYTROPES NGOC MAI TRAN arxiv:1310.2012v4 [math.co] 11 Apr 2016 Abstract. Polytropes are both ordinary and tropical polytopes. We show that tropical types of polytropes in TP n 1 are in bijection
More informationA non-partitionable Cohen-Macaulay simplicial complex, and implications for Stanley depth
A non-partitionable Cohen-Macaulay simplicial complex, and implications for Stanley depth Art Duval 1, Bennet Goeckner 2, Caroline Klivans 3, Jeremy Martin 2 1 University of Texas at El Paso, 2 University
More informationA non-partitionable Cohen-Macaulay simplicial complex
A non-partitionable Cohen-Macaulay simplicial complex Art Duval 1, Bennet Goeckner 2, Caroline Klivans 3, Jeremy Martin 2 1 University of Texas at El Paso, 2 University of Kansas, 3 Brown University Department
More informationA brief survey of A-resultants, A-discriminants, and A-determinants
A brief survey of A-resultants, A-discriminants, and A-determinants Madeline Brandt, Aaron Brookner, Christopher Eur November 27, 2017 Abstract We give a minimalistic guide to understanding a central result
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.co] 30 Oct 1998
arxiv:math/9810180v1 [math.co] 30 Oct 1998 THE SATURATION CONJECTURE (AFTER A. KNUTSON AND T. TAO) ANDERS SKOVSTED BUCH The purpose of this exposition 1 is to give a simple and complete treatment of Knutson
More informationOn polytopality of Cartesian products of graphs
On polytopality of Cartesian products of graphs J. Pfeifle 1, V. Pilaud 2, and F. Santos 3 1 Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona. julian.pfeifle@upc.edu 2 Université Pierre et Marie Curie,
More informationPebble Sets in Convex Polygons
2 1 Pebble Sets in Convex Polygons Kevin Iga, Randall Maddox June 15, 2005 Abstract Lukács and András posed the problem of showing the existence of a set of n 2 points in the interior of a convex n-gon
More informationElementary Combinatorial Topology
Elementary Combinatorial Topology Frédéric Meunier Université Paris Est, CERMICS, Ecole des Ponts Paristech, 6-8 avenue Blaise Pascal, 77455 Marne-la-Vallée Cedex E-mail address: frederic.meunier@cermics.enpc.fr
More informationRigidity of ball-polyhedra via truncated Voronoi and Delaunay complexes
!000111! NNNiiinnnttthhh IIInnnttteeerrrnnnaaatttiiiooonnnaaalll SSSyyymmmpppooosssiiiuuummm ooonnn VVVooorrrooonnnoooiii DDDiiiaaagggrrraaammmsss iiinnn SSSccciiieeennnccceee aaannnddd EEEnnngggiiinnneeeeeerrriiinnnggg
More informationOptimal Region for Binary Search Tree, Rotation and Polytope
Optimal Region for Binary Search Tree, Rotation and Polytope Kensuke Onishi Mamoru Hoshi 2 Department of Mathematical Sciences, School of Science Tokai University, 7 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, 259-292,
More informationProperties of Cut Polytopes
Properties of Cut Polytopes Ankan Ganguly October 4, 2013 Abstract In this paper we begin by identifying some general properties shared by all cut polytopes which can be used to analyze the general cut
More informationBinary trees having a given number of nodes with 0, 1, and 2 children.
Binary trees having a given number of nodes with 0, 1, and 2 children. Günter Rote 13. August 1997 Zusammenfassung We give three combinatorial proofs for the number of binary trees having a given number
More informationPlanar Graphs. 1 Graphs and maps. 1.1 Planarity and duality
Planar Graphs In the first half of this book, we consider mostly planar graphs and their geometric representations, mostly in the plane. We start with a survey of basic results on planar graphs. This chapter
More informationDiscrete Mathematics I So Practice Sheet Solutions 1
Discrete Mathematics I So 2016 Tibor Szabó Shagnik Das Practice Sheet Solutions 1 Provided below are possible solutions to the questions from the practice sheet issued towards the end of the course. Exercise
More informationOn the number of distinct directions of planes determined by n points in R 3
On the number of distinct directions of planes determined by n points in R 3 Rom Pinchasi August 27, 2007 Abstract We show that any set of n points in R 3, that is not contained in a plane, determines
More informationG 6i try. On the Number of Minimal 1-Steiner Trees* Discrete Comput Geom 12:29-34 (1994)
Discrete Comput Geom 12:29-34 (1994) G 6i try 9 1994 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. On the Number of Minimal 1-Steiner Trees* B. Aronov, 1 M. Bern, 2 and D. Eppstein 3 Computer Science Department, Polytechnic
More informationTechnische Universität München Zentrum Mathematik
Technische Universität München Zentrum Mathematik Prof. Dr. Dr. Jürgen Richter-Gebert, Bernhard Werner Projective Geometry SS 208 https://www-m0.ma.tum.de/bin/view/lehre/ss8/pgss8/webhome Solutions for
More informationConvexity: an introduction
Convexity: an introduction Geir Dahl CMA, Dept. of Mathematics and Dept. of Informatics University of Oslo 1 / 74 1. Introduction 1. Introduction what is convexity where does it arise main concepts and
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 12 Aug 2018
CONVEX UNION REPRESENTABILITY AND CONVEX CODES R. AMZI JEFFS AND ISABELLA NOVIK arxiv:1808.03992v1 [math.co] 12 Aug 2018 Abstract. We introduce and investigate d-convex union representable complexes: the
More informationIndependence Complexes of Certain Families of Graphs
Independence Complexes of Certain Families of Graphs Rickard Fors rifo0@kth.se Master thesis in Mathematics at KTH Presented August 19, 011 Supervisor: Jakob Jonsson Abstract The focus of this report
More informationHamiltonian cycles in bipartite quadrangulations on the torus
Hamiltonian cycles in bipartite quadrangulations on the torus Atsuhiro Nakamoto and Kenta Ozeki Abstract In this paper, we shall prove that every bipartite quadrangulation G on the torus admits a simple
More informationNewton Polytopes of Cluster Variables. Adam Michael Kalman. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the. requirements for the degree of
Newton Polytopes of Cluster Variables by Adam Michael Kalman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics in the Graduate Division
More information