USE OF V S30 TO REPRESENT LOCAL SITE CONDITIONS
|
|
- Jasper Hopkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 USE OF V S30 TO REPRESENT LOCAL SITE CONDITIONS Presented by I. M. Idriss, Professor Emeritus University of California at Davis imidriss@aol.com Presented at the Session 6 on The V s30 Dialog How We Can & Cannot use V s30 in Site Response Estimation? 4 th IASPEI / IAEE International Symposium Effects OF Surface Geology on Strong Ground Motion Santa Barbara, California August 26, 2011
2 Wave propagation theory suggests that ground motion amplitude should depend on the density and shear wave velocity, V s, of the near surface material (e.g., Bullen, 1965; Aki & Richards, 1980). Density does not vary very much with depth; hence V s becomes the logical choice for representing site conditions. The essential issue then becomes in how to express this dependence.
3 Two methods have been proposed over the past 30 years.
4 Method No The "average" velocity over the depth range corresponding to ¼ wavelength of the period of interest (Joyner et al, 1981).
5 Average Vs = 1100 m/s Average Vs = 800 m/s Average Vs = 400 m/s 100 Average Vs = 200 m/s 1/4 Wave Length (m) Frequency (Hz)
6 Method No The use of V s30 (Borcherdt, 1994), who recommended the use of Vs30 as a means for classifying Site Categories for building codes.
7 * * n V V f5 PGA 1100,VS30 a10ln bln PGA1100 c bln 1100 for V V VLIN V LN I * S30 S30 ( ) = ( + ) + PGA + cln S30 < L * * V S30 f5( PGA 1100,VS30) = ( a10 + bn) Ln for VS30 V VLIN LIN IN V = V * S30 S30 for V < V S30 1 V = V * S30 1 for V S30 V 1 V 1 = 1500 m/s for T 0.50 sec ( 1 ) V1 = exp Ln T 0.2 for 0.50 sec < T 1 sec V1 = exp Ln ( T ) for 1 sec < T < 2 sec V = 700 m/s for T 2 sec 1 From Abrahamson & Silva (2008)
8 More recently, four of the five NGA relationships used V s30 as an independent parameter to explicitly represent local site conditions. Amplification [w.r.t. V S30 = 1100 m/s] V S30 (m/s) Linear PGA1100 = 0.1 g PGA1100 = 0.3 g PGA1100 = 0.5 g V 1 Example of the V S30 scaling for T = 0.2 sec From Abrahamson & Silva (2008)
9 1.4 PGA for V s30 / PGA for V s30 = 1100 m/s PGA Abrahamson & Silva (2008) Boore & Atkinson (2008) 0.2 Campbell & Bozorgnia (2008) Chiou & Youngs (2008) Average Shear wave velocity, V s30 (m/s)
10 PSA for V s30 / PSA for V s30 = 1100 m/s PSA for T = 1sec Abrahamson & Silva (2008) Boore & Atkinson (2008) Campbell & Bozorgnia (2008) Chiou & Youngs (2008) Average Shear wave velocity, V s30 (m/s)
11 NGA DATA 2011 FLATFILE
12 From Flatfile 8 Earthquake magnitude, M Closest distance, R (km)
13 From Flatfile 8 Earthquake magnitude, M V s30 (m/s)
14 From Flatfile 1 Best estimate for R 160 km 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Best estimate for R > 160 km Tottori; M = 6.6; Mech 0 Dist, R 160 km Dist, R > 160 km PGA values adjusted to V s30 = 580 m/s Closest distance, R (km)
15 Total No. of Entries 8163 Non-FF 426 Mag not listed 201 Mechanism not listed 139 Distance not listed 92 Vs30 not listed 17 PSA not listed 63 Mag < Distance > 160 km 1890 Others 136 Total No. of FF Entries to be used 5026
16 FF Records; Dist 160 km; M Earthquake magnitude, M Closest distance, R (km)
17 FF Records; Dist 160 km; M Earthquake magnitude, M V s30 (m/s)
18 FF Records; Dist 160 km; M Earthquake magnitude, M PGA (g)
19 FF Records; Dist 160 km; M Earthquake magnitude, M PGV (cm/s)
20 DATA SET Stations having V s m/s and R 160 km Total Number of records used = 1288 [147 recordings (Vs m/s) from the Chi-Chi main shock were excluded] 4.5 M km R 160 km 450 m/s V s m/s [only 10 recordings at site with V s30 > 1200 m/s]
21 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) g x( - 45 ) Ln y = a + a M - b + b M Ln R R + V 0 + ff s30 M > 6.75 Period (sec) α 1 α 2 β 1 β 2 γ φ 0.01 (PGA) ξ M 6.75 Period (sec) α 1 α 2 β 1 β 2 γ φ ξ 0.01 (PGA) Range of M ==> 4.5 to 8 Range of R ==> 0 to 160 km Range of Vs30 ==> 450 to 2100 m/s IMI_2011
22 Individual recording Overall trend Discrete averages over M, R, or V s30 bins Residual Earthquake magnitude, M
23 Residual Closest distance, R (km)
24 Residual V s30 (m/s)
25 Residual V s30 (m/s)
26 1 PGA (g) 0.1 M = relationship V s30 = 450 m/s 2011 relationship V s30 = 900 m/s 2008 relationship 450 m/s V s m/s M = Closest distance, R (km)
27 1.4 PGA for V s30 / PGA for V s30 = 1100 m/s Based on IMI_ PGA Abrahamson & Silva (2008) Boore & Atkinson (2008) 0.2 Campbell & Bozorgnia (2008) Chiou & Youngs (2008) Average Shear wave velocity, V s30 (m/s)
28 PSA for V s30 / PSA for V s30 = 1100 m/s PSA for T = 1sec Abrahamson & Silva (2008) Boore & Atkinson (2008) Campbell & Bozorgnia (2008) Chiou & Youngs (2008) Average Based on IMI_ Shear wave velocity, V s30 (m/s)
29 WHAT DO THE NGA DATA SHOW?
30 Examination in terms of the ratio of: PGV/V s30 which may be considered as a "proxy" for shear strain induced by the earthquake ground motions Plotting PGA versus this ratio can then be examined as if it were a "stress- strain" relationship
31 1 V s30 based on measured V s 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Range & number of V s30 values to 900 m/s; to 1000 m/s; to 1200 m/s; to 1400 m/s; to 2000 m/s; Shear strain (%)
32 1 V s30 based on measured V s 0.1 PGA (g) recordings Range & number of V s30 values to 500 m/s; to 550 m/s; to 600 m/s; to 700 m/s; to 800 m/s; Shear strain (%)
33 1 0.1 PGA (g) recordings 16 recordings 22 recordings V s30 based on measured V s Shear strain (%) Range & number of V s30 values 450 to 500 m/s; to 550 m/s; to 600 m/s; to 700 m/s; to 800 m/s; 131
34 G/G max Comp rock Weathered rock Clay; PI = Shear strain (%)
35 1 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Range & number of V s30 values to 250 m/s; to 300 m/s; to 350 m/s; to 400 m/s; 144 V s30 based on measured V s 400 to 450 m/s; Shear strain (%)
36 G/G max Sand layers over depth range of 500 ft 120 to 250 ft 50 to 120 ft 20 to 50 ft 20 ft Shear strain (%)
37 1 0.1 PGA (g) V s30 based on measured V s Shear strain (%) Range & number of V s30 values 100 to 140 m/s; to 180 m/s; to 200 m/s; to 210 m/s; 74
38
39 Examination in terms of : Variations of PGA and PSA, at T = 1 sec, with Distance For various bins of V s30 Chi-Chi main shock data
40 1 Peak horizontal acceleration (g) pga V 30 (m/s) = Chi Chi main shock M = 7.6; Mechanism Closest distance to rupture surface (km)
41 1 Peak horizontal acceleration (g) pga Regression curve for V s30 (m/s) = V s30 (m/s) = V s30 (m/s) = V s30 (m/s) = Chi Chi main shock M = 7.6; Mechanism Closest distance to rupture surface (km)
42 PGA (g) PGA calculated at a Distance = 3 km Distance = 30 km Distance = 100 km V S30 (m/s)
43 PSA (T = 1 s) for V s30 PSA (T = 1 s) for V s30 = 450 m/s Dist = 1 km Dist = 3 km Dist = 10 km Dist = 30 km Dist = 100 km V s30 (m/s) Based on Chi-Chi Recordings
44 Based on recorded data from other than the Chi-Chi earthquake
45 Range of V s30 Landers earthquake, M = to 450 m/s (10) 350 to 400 m/s (8) 300 to 350 m/s (34) 250 to 300 m/s (13) 200 to 250 m/s (5) PGA (g) Range of V s30 Sierra el Mayor earthquake, M = to 450 m/s (27) 350 to 400 m/s (32) 300 to 350 m/s (46) 250 to 300 m/s (56) 200 to 250 m/s (22) 0.01 Range of V s30 Hector Mine earthquake, M = to 450 m/s (5) 350 to 400 m/s (34) 300 to 350 m/s (32) 250 to 300 m/s (33) 200 to 250 m/s (6) Closest distance (km)
46 Recorded values at sites with range of V s30 = 400 to 450 m/s Regressed curve 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Landers earthquake, M = 7.28 Sierra el Mayor earthquake, M = 7.2 Hector Mine earthquake, M = Closest distance (km)
47 Recorded values at sites with range of V s30 = 350 to 400 m/s Regressed curve 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Landers earthquake, M = 7.28 Sierra el Mayor earthquake, M = 7.2 Hector Mine earthquake, M = Closest distance (km)
48 Recorded values at sites with range of V s30 = 300 to 350 m/s Regressed curve 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Landers earthquake, M = 7.28 Sierra el Mayor earthquake, M = 7.2 Hector Mine earthquake, M = Closest distance (km)
49 Recorded values at sites with range of V s30 = 250 to 300 m/s Regressed curve 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Landers earthquake, M = 7.28 Sierra el Mayor earthquake, M = 7.2 Hector Mine earthquake, M = Closest distance (km)
50 Recorded values at sites with range of V s30 = 200 to 250 m/s Regressed curve 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Landers earthquake, M = 7.28 Sierra el Mayor earthquake, M = 7.2 Hector Mine earthquake, M = Closest distance (km)
51 Regressed curves Range of V s30 = 400 to 450 m/s Range of V s30 = 350 to 400 m/s Range of V s30 = 300 to 350 m/s Range of V s30 = 250 to 300 m/s Range of V s30 = 200 to 250 m/s 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Landers earthquake, M = 7.28 Sierra el Mayor earthquake, M = 7.2 Hector Mine earthquake, M = Closest distance (km)
52 Recorded values at sites with range of V s30 = 300 to 350 m/s Regressed curve 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Loma Prieta earthquake, M = 6.9 Iwate earthquake, M = 6.9 Chuetsu-Oki earthquake, M = 6.8 Kobe earthquake, M = Closest distance (km)
53 Regressed curves Range of V s30 = 400 to 450 m/s Range of V s30 = 350 to 400 m/s Range of V s30 = 300 to 350 m/s Range of V s30 = 250 to 300 m/s Range of V s30 = 200 to 250 m/s 0.1 PGA (g) 0.01 Loma Prieta earthquake, M = 6.9 Iwate earthquake, M = 6.9 Chuetsu-Oki earthquake, M = 6.8 Kobe earthquake, M = Closest distance (km)
54 WHAT DO THE NGA DATA SHOW? The data generally do not fully support the "published" trends.
55 Site Response Studies
56 Shear wave velocity, V s (m) 0 Layer Depth below ground surface (m) Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4 Layer 5 Layer Profile abc V s30 = 220 m/s 120 Halfspace V s = 1100 m/s 120 Profile abc
57 Shear wave velocity, V s (m) Depth below ground surface (m) Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4 Layer 5 Layer Profile cba Vs30 = 220 m/s 120 Halfspace V s = 1100 m/s 120
58 CONCLUDING REMARKS ü V s30 is not a fundamental geotechnical parameter ü V s30 is not a unique geotechnical parameter ü Since G/G max is material-dependent ü V s30 is neither necessary nor sufficient to describe or accommodate nonlinear effects
59 CONCLUDING REMARKS ü The contributions of the soil profile below 30 m to site response, cannot be accommodated with the use of V s30 with or without including the depth to V s = 1 km/s or to V s = 2.5 km/s (even if these depths are known for a sufficient number of sites). ü Sites with "identical" V s30, but differing layering, can have significantly different response
60 CONCLUDING REMARKS ü Additional work is needed before V s30 should be used as a continuous independent parameter in earthquake ground motions attenuation relationships. ü The use of a range of V s30 to describe a generalized "site category" for building code purposes, is reasonable.
61 CONCLUDING REMARKS ü Site-specific response calculations (with at least 7 rock outcrop input motions) are preferable for assessing local site effects this requires high quality site response calculations. ü Distance dependence can be critical further studies are in progress, incorporating V s30 in estimating the slope of the attenuation relationship.
62
63
SMSIM Calibration for the SCEC Validation Project NGA-East Workshop Berkeley 12/11/12
SMSIM Calibration for the SCEC Validation Project NGA-East Workshop Berkeley 12/11/12 SWUS GMC SSHAC Level 3 Carola Di Alessandro GeoPentech with inputs from D.M. Boore OUTLINE Introduce SMSIM (Stochastic
More informationGround Motion Simulations Validation process and summary of status
Ground Motion Simulations Validation process and summary of status Many thanx to: N. Abrahamson, P. Somerville, F. Silva, P. Maechling, R. Archuleta, J. Anderson, K. Assatourians, G. Atkinson, J. Bayless,
More informationGround Motion Simulations Validation process and summary of status
Ground Motion Simulations Validation process and summary of status Many thanx to: N. Abrahamson, P. Somerville, F. Silva, P. Maechling, R. Archuleta, J. Anderson, K. Assatourians, G. Atkinson, J. Bayless,
More informationHanging-Wall and Directivity Effects on the Near-Fault Ground Motions
Hanging-Wall and Directivity Effects on the Near-Fault Ground Motions Brian Chiou 1 and Yin-Tung Yen 2 1. California Department of Transportation 2. Sinotech Engineering Inc. Simulations and Near-Fault
More informationSummary of Traditional Sigma (Ergodic) from GMPEs
SSHAC Level 3 Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Characterization WS-2, October 24, 2013 Berkeley, CA Summary of Traditional Sigma (Ergodic) from s Linda Al Atik Candidate Models NGA-West1 s: Abrahamson &
More informationEffects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion
4 th IASPEI / IAEE International Symposium: Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion August 23 26, 2011 University of California Santa Barbara CONSISTENCY OF GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS FROM SITE RESPONSE
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL HARD ROCK ATTENUATION RELATIONS FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN NORTH AMERICA, MID-CONTINENT AND GULF COAST AREAS
August 13, 2003 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL HARD ROCK ATTENUATION RELATIONS FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN NORTH AMERICA, MID-CONTINENT AND GULF COAST AREAS Background Walter Silva *, Nick Gregor *, Robert Darragh
More informationSelection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 26 (2006) 477 482 www.elsevier.com/locate/soildyn Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling Jennie Watson-Lamprey a, *, Norman Abrahamson b a
More informationELASTIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE SPECTRA
th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering June -8, 7 Paper No. 6 ELASTIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE SPECTRA Dimitra MANOU, Anastasios ANASTASIADIS, Kyriazis PITILAKIS ABSTRACT In view
More informationNGA-West2 models for ground-motion directionality
NGA-West2 models for ground-motion directionality Shrey K. Shahi, a), and Jack W. Baker b) M.EERI The NGA-West2 research program, coordinated by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER),
More informationNUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SHAKING TABLE TESTS ON DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF DRY SAND
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SHAKING TABLE TESTS ON DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF DRY SAND F. Jafarzadeh 1, D. Faghihi 2 and M. Ehsani 3 1 Assistant Professor, Civil Eng Dept, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran,
More informationProShake 2.0. The first step in this tutorial exercise is to start the ProShake 2.0 program. Click on the ProShake 2.0 icon to start the program.
PROSHAKE 2.0 TUTORIAL The easiest way to learn the basics of ProShake s organization and operation is to complete the tutorial exercise detailed in this section. This tutorial will take you through nearly
More informationPEER Directivity End-Users Panel
2016 COSMOS Annual Meeting and Technical Session Program 18 November 2016 PEER Directivity End-Users Panel Dr. Yousef Bozorgnia, P.E., F. ASCE, U.C. Berkeley Dr. Jennifer Donahue, P.E., Geosyntec Consultants
More informationDIRECTIVITY CENTERING OF GMPES AND OF DIRECTIVITY MODELS
Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy June 25-29, 2018 Los Angeles, California DIRECTIVITY CENTERING OF GMPES AND OF DIRECTIVITY MODELS B.
More informationExample Applications of A Stochastic Ground Motion Simulation Methodology in Structural Engineering
Example Applications of A Stochastic Ground Motion Simulation Methodology in Structural Engineering S. Rezaeian & N. Luco U.S. Geological Survey, Golden, CO, USA ABSTRACT: Example engineering applications
More informationProShake Ground Response Analysis Program Version 2.0 User s Manual
ProShake Ground Response Analysis Program Version 2.0 User s Manual Copyright 1998-2017 by EduPro Civil Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EduPro Civil Systems, Inc. Sammamish, Washington proshake@proshake.com
More informationRocking Component of Earthquake Induced by Horizontal Motion in Irregular Form Foundation
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 24 Paper No. 121 Rocking Component of Earthquake Induced by Horizontal Motion in Irregular Form Foundation Tohru Jomen
More informationUSING NEURAL NETWORK FOR PREDICTION OF THE DYNAMIC PERIOD AND AMPLIFICATION FACTOR OF SOIL FOR MICROZONATION IN URBAN AREA
USING NEURAL NETWORK FOR PREDICTION OF THE DYNAMIC PERIOD AND AMPLIFICATION FACTOR OF SOIL FOR MICROZONATION IN URBAN AREA Tahamoli Roodsari, Mehrzad 1 and Habibi, Mohammad Reza 2 1 M.S. in Earthquake
More informationTransactions, SMiRT-22 San Francisco, California, August 18-23, 2013 Division 5
Transactions, SMiRT-22 San Francisco, California, August 18-23, 2013 LACK OF CORRELATION (INCOHERENCE) MODELING AND EFFECTS FROM REALISTIC 3D, INCLINED, BODY AND SURFACE SEISMIC MOTIONS N. Tafazzoli 1,
More information9 FREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING
TUTORIAL MANUAL 9 FREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING This example demonstrates the natural frequency of a long five-storey building when subjected to free vibration and earthquake loading.
More informationSeismic Fragility Assessment of Highway Bridge
Seismic Fragility Assessment of Highway Bridge S. Mahmoudi & L. Chouinard Dept. of Civil Engineering, McGill University, QC, Canada SUMMARY: This paper addresses issues in the fragility analysis of bridges
More informationVerification and Validation for Seismic Wave Propagation Problems
Chapter 26 Verification and Validation for Seismic Wave Propagation Problems (1989-2-24-25-28-29-21-211-217-) (In collaboration with Dr. Nima Tafazzoli, Dr. Federico Pisanò, Mr. Kohei Watanabe and Mr.
More informationOrientation dependence of ground motion and structural response of reinforced concrete space frames
Vienna Congress on Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2013 (VEESD 2013) S.A. Ghazizadeh, D.N. Grant & T. Rossetto 28-30 August 2013, Vienna, Austria Paper No. 71 Orientation
More informationFREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING
8 FREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING This example demonstrates the natural frequency of a long five-storey building when subjected to free vibration and earthquake loading. The building
More informationProShake. User s Manual. Ground Response Analysis Program. Version 2.0. Copyright by EduPro Civil Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
ProShake Ground Response Analysis Program Version 2.0 User s Manual Copyright 1998-2017 by EduPro Civil Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EduPro Civil Systems, Inc. Sammamish, Washington proshake@proshake.com
More informationComparison of 3D and 1D Wave Propagation Effects in the San Francisco Bay Area
Comparison of 3D and 1D Wave Propagation Effects in the San Francisco Bay Area Arben Pitarka SWUS GMC Workshop 2 October, 2013 LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department
More informationFREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING
14 FREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING This example demonstrates the natural frequency of a five-storey building when subjected to free vibration and earthquake loading. The building consists
More information3D GROUND MOTION SIMULATION IN BASINS
FINAL REPORT TO PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER LIFELINES PROGRAM TASK 1A03 3D GROUND MOTION SIMULATION IN BASINS Period of Performance: August 1, 2002 March 31, 2004 Coordinating P. I.:
More informationA comparison between large-size shaking table test and numerical simulation results of subway station structure
October 127, 28, Beijing, China A comparison between large-size shaking table test and numerical simulation results of subway station structure ABSTRACT : CHEN Guo-xing 1, ZUO Xi 1, ZHUANG Hai-yang 1,
More informationVALIDATION OF SASSI2010 SOLUTION METHODS THROUGH INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION USING SAP2000 FOR DEEPLY EMBEDDED STRUCTURES WITH LARGE FOOTPRINTS
Transactions, SMiRT-22 VALIDATION OF SASSI2010 SOLUTION METHODS THROUGH INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION USING SAP2000 FOR DEEPLY EMBEDDED STRUCTURES WITH LARGE FOOTPRINTS Lisa M Anderson 1, Tarek Elkhoraibi,
More informationEffects and Multi Directional Seismic Ground Motion
SEAOSC Seismology Committee Webinar 14 April 2011 Analysis and Design for Orthogonal Effects and Multi Directional Seismic Ground Motion Considering Recent Code Changes Baris.Erkus@Arup.com PhD PE Arup,
More informationDYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A GENERATOR ON AN ELASTIC FOUNDATION
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A GENERATOR ON AN ELASTIC FOUNDATION 7 DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A GENERATOR ON AN ELASTIC FOUNDATION In this tutorial the influence of a vibrating source on its surrounding soil is studied.
More informationAppendix H. WSliq User s Manual
Appendix H WSliq User s Manual This manual presents a description of how the WSliq program can be used to perform a variety of important liquefaction hazard analyses. The WSliq program was created as part
More informationUpdated Sections 3.5 and 3.6
Addendum The authors recommend the replacement of Sections 3.5 3.6 and Table 3.15 with the content of this addendum. Consequently, the recommendation is to replace the 13 models and their weights with
More informationAnalysis of Vertical Ground Motion / Phase Motion Near Fault Records in JAPAN and Its Application to Simulation of Vertical Ground Motion
Analysis of ertical Ground Motion / Phase Motion Near Fault s in JAPAN and Its Application to Simulation of ertical Ground Motion T. HARADA & M. NAKAMURA Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University
More informationLiquefaction Analysis in 3D based on Neural Network Algorithm
Liquefaction Analysis in 3D based on Neural Network Algorithm M. Tolon Istanbul Technical University, Turkey D. Ural Istanbul Technical University, Turkey SUMMARY: Simplified techniques based on in situ
More informationDATA REPORT. SASW Measurements at the NEES Garner Valley Test Site, California
13 January 2004 DATA REPORT SASW Measurements at the NEES Garner Valley Test Site, California by Kenneth H. Stokoe, II, Ph.D., P.E., Jennie C. and Milton T. Graves Chair in Engineering Asli Kurtulus, M.S.,
More informationComparative Analysis on Earthquake Response of Subway Tunnels between Numerical Simulation and Shaking Table Test
The 12 th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG) 1-6 October, 28 Goa, India Comparative Analysis on Earthquake Response of Subway
More informationWork Plan for Scenario Earthquake Simulations (SEQ.1)
Work Plan for Scenario Earthquake Simulations (SEQ.1) Robert W. Graves prepared for the SCEC 3D Modeling Group July 1, 23 Introduction This documentation describes the work plan for the simulation of scenario
More informationStudy of constitutive models for soils under cyclic loading
Study of constitutive models for soils under cyclic loading Introducing a non-linear model with a spline-based backbone curve Pedro Alonso Pinto Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon
More informationSHAKE2000 A Computer Program for the 1-D Analysis of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Problems
3 SHAKE2000 A Computer Program for the 1-D Analysis of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Problems Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration (g) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Period (sec) User s Manual 0.025 Gustavo
More informationSOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS FOR BURIED STRUCTURES IN SOFT, SLOPING SOILS - BART SAN FRANCISCO TRANSITION STRUCTURE
SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS FOR BURIED STRUCTURES IN SOFT, SLOPING SOILS - BART SAN FRANCISCO TRANSITION STRUCTURE Priyanshu Singh 1, Weiyu Chen 1, and Shahriar Vahdani 2 ABSTRACT : 1 Senior Engineer,
More informationAn Improved Algorithm for Selecting Ground Motions to Match a Conditional Spectrum
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 An Improved Algorithm for Selecting Ground Motions to Match a Conditional Spectrum Jack W. Baker and Cynthia Lee Department
More informationPEER Report Addendum.
PEER Report 2017-03 Addendum. The authors recommend the replacement of Section 3.5.1 and Table 3.15 with the content of this Addendum. Consequently, the recommendation is to replace the 13 models and their
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More informationReport on Progress at the Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD)
Report on Progress at the Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD) H. Haddadi, A. Shakal, M. Huang & J. Parrish California Geological Survey, USA C. Stephens, W. Savage & W. Leith U. S. Geological
More informationA METHOD TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE GMPEs FOR A SELECTED SEISMIC PRONE REGION
A METHOD TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE GMPEs FOR A SELECTED SEISMIC PRONE REGION Ö. Kale & S. Akkar Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara Turkey SUMMARY:
More informationEffects of multi-scale velocity heterogeneities on wave-equation migration Yong Ma and Paul Sava, Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines
Effects of multi-scale velocity heterogeneities on wave-equation migration Yong Ma and Paul Sava, Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines SUMMARY Velocity models used for wavefield-based seismic
More information3D PHYSICS-BASED NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS: ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF A NEW FRONTIER TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION PREDICTION.
6th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering & 2nd National Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology June 14-16, 2017 3D PHYSICS-BASED NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS: ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS
More informationA FIXED-BASE MODEL WITH CLASSICAL NORMAL MODES FOR SOIL- STRUCTURE INTERACTION SYSTEMS
A FIXED-BASE MODEL WIH CLASSICAL NORMAL MODES FOR SOIL- SRUCURE INERACION SYSEMS 46 Wen-Hwa WU SUMMARY o simplify the analysis of soil-structure interaction (SSI) systems, different fixed-base models have
More informationOpenSees2DPS (Beta 0.1): 2D Plane Strain Analysis
University of California, San Diego Department of Structural Engineering OpenSees2DPS (Beta 0.1): 2D Plane Strain Analysis User Manual Draft Ning Wang, Jinchi Lu, Zhaohui Yang and Ahmed Elgamal (Please
More informationURS Washington Division, Princeton, NJ, USA. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Kobe, Japan
Seismic SSI Response of Reactor Building Structures Dan M. Ghiocel Ghiocel Predictive Technologies, Rochester, NY, USA Luben Todorovski URS Washington Division, Princeton, NJ, USA Hiroyuki Fuyama and Daisuke
More informationChallenges and Tools for Non-Linear SSI Analysis
Challenges and Tools for Non-Linear SSI Analysis Boris University of California, Davis Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley UCB SSI Meeting, January 2013 Presentation Goals Briefly overview
More informationPlans for the Demonstrations of the Efficacy of the BBP Validation Gauntlets for Building Response Analysis Applications 2016 SCEC Project
Plans for the Demonstrations of the Efficacy of the BBP Validation Gauntlets for Building Response Analysis Applications 2016 SCEC Project EERI Seminar SCEC GMSV on Next TAG Virtual Generation Coordination
More informationSCALING OF EARTHQUAKE ACCELEROGRAMS FOR NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSES TO MATCH THE EARTHQUAKE DESIGN SPECTRA. Y. Fahjan 1 and Z.
SCALING OF EARTHQUAKE ACCELEROGRAMS FOR NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSES TO MATCH THE EARTHQUAKE DESIGN SPECTRA Y. Fahjan 1 and Z. Ozdemir 2 1 Asst. Prof., Dept. of Earthquake and Structural Science, Gebze
More informationHow to correct and complete discharge data Main text
Table of Contents. General 2. Completion from another record at the same station 3. Interpolating discharge gaps of short duration 4. Interpolating gaps during recessions 5. Interpolation using regression
More informationA STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON THREE DIMENSIONAL DYNAMIC RESPONSES OF EMBANKMENTS
October 12-17, 28, Beijing, China A STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON THREE DIMENSIONAL DYNAMIC RESPONSES OF EMBANKMENTS S. Kano 1 a, Y. Yokoi 2, Y. Sasaki 3 and Y. Hata 4 1 Assistant Professor,
More informationBroadband Platform Release Overview
Broadband Platform 16.5.0 Release Overview SCEC CME Group 25 May 2016 1 What is the Broadband Platform (BBP)? Collaborative software system SCEC research groups CME software development Computes seismograms
More informationPrediction of Liquefaction Resistance Using a Combination of CPT Cone and Sleeve Resistances - It s really a Contour Surface
6 th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering 1-4 November 2015 Christchurch, New Zealand Prediction of Liquefaction Resistance Using a Combination of CPT Cone and Sleeve Resistances
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF PROTOTYPE OF INTEGRATED EARTHQUAKE DISASTER SIMULATOR USING DIGITAL CITY AND STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATOR WITH HIGH-RESOLUTION
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 1418 DEVELOPMENT OF PROTOTYPE OF INTEGRATED EARTHQUAKE DISASTER SIMULATOR USING DIGITAL CITY AND STRONG
More informationA Study of Deriving Fragility Curves by Using GPS Data at Control Points before and after Chi-Chi Earthquake
A Study of Deriving Fragility Curves by Using GPS Data at Control Points before and after Chi-Chi Earthquake Che-Hao CHANG and Ming-Ko CHUNG, Chinese Taipei Key words: PGD; fragility curve; ground strain.
More information6 SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS AND SEISMIC INPUT
Version 517 26May2017 AP/BJ/JJ 6.1 OVERVIEW 6 SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS AND SEISMIC INPUT Seismic input is the earthquake ground motion that defines the seismic environment to which the soil-structure system
More informationDeveloper s Tip. An Introduction to the Theory of Planar Failure. Concepts of Planar Rock Slope Failure
Developer s Tip An Introduction to the Theory of Planar Failure In this article we explain the basic concepts behind planar failure analysis of rock slopes. We also discuss the geometric conditions that
More information3D Analysis of the Influence of Varying Rock/Soil Profiles on Seismic NPP Response
3D Analysis of the Influence of on Seismic NPP Response B. Jeremić, N. Tafazzoli, N. Orbović, A. Blahoianu University of California, Davis, CA, U.S.A. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Ottawa, ON, Canada
More informationBroadband Pla+orm Valida/on Exercise for Pseudo- Spectral Accelera/on: Review Panel Summary
Broadband Pla+orm Valida/on Exercise for Pseudo- Spectral Accelera/on: Review Panel Summary Douglas Dreger (UCB) Review Panel Gregory Beroza Steven Day Douglas Dreger (Chair) Chris/ne Goulet Thomas Jordan
More informationSloshing reduction effect of splitting wall in cylindrical tank
Sloshing reduction effect of splitting wall in cylindrical tank D.Takabatake 1, S.Sawada 2, N.Yoneyama 2 and M.Miura 3 1 Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 1646,Abiko, Abiko, Chiba,
More informationSSR Polygonal Search Area
SSR Polygonal Search Area 22-1 SSR Polygonal Search Area In this tutorial, Phase2 is used to determine the factor of safety of a slope using the shear strength reduction (SSR) method. The SSR Polygon Search
More informationDispersion Curve Extraction (1-D Profile)
PS User Guide Series 2015 Dispersion Curve Extraction (1-D Profile) Working with Sample Data ("Vs1DMASW.dat") Prepared By Choon B. Park, Ph.D. January 2015 Table of Contents Page 1. Overview 2 2. Bounds
More informationNGA Ground Motion Database
NGA Ground Motion Database Carola Di Alessandro Post Doctoral Fellow @ PEER UC Berkeley (*) * Currently at GeoPentech, Inc. PURPOSE Update of the PEER Ground Motion Database 2010 Beta Version (http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database)
More informationREMI and SPAC: A Comparison
REMI and SPAC: A Comparison Don Zhao Geogiga Technology Corp. Outline Overview Comparison by Synthetic Data Linear Array for Omni-Directional Sources Field Setup of Triangular Array for SPAC Conclusion
More informationWe B3 12 Full Waveform Inversion for Reservoir Characterization - A Synthetic Study
We B3 12 Full Waveform Inversion for Reservoir Characterization - A Synthetic Study E. Zabihi Naeini* (Ikon Science), N. Kamath (Colorado School of Mines), I. Tsvankin (Colorado School of Mines), T. Alkhalifah
More informationFLOW VISUALISATION AROUND A SOLID SPHERE ON A ROUGH BED UNDER REGULAR WAVES
FLOW VISUALISATION AROUND A SOLID SPHERE ON A ROUGH BED UNDER REGULAR WAVES H.P.V.Vithana 1, Richard Simons 2 and Martin Hyde 3 Flow visualization using Volumetric Three-component Velocimetry (V3V) was
More informationLimitations of Rayleigh Dispersion Curve Obtained from Simulated Ambient Vibrations
Limitations of Rayleigh Dispersion Curve Obtained from Simulated Ambient Vibrations KEN TOKESHI and CARLOS CUADRA Department of Architecture and Environment Systems Akita Prefectural University 84-4 Ebinokuchi,
More informationPS wave AVO aspects on processing, inversion, and interpretation
PS wave AVO aspects on processing, inversion, and interpretation Yong Xu, Paradigm Geophysical Canada Summary Using PS wave AVO inversion, density contrasts can be obtained from converted wave data. The
More informationNumerical Modelling of Engineering Structures subjected to Dynamic Seismic Loading
Paper 115 Numerical Modelling of Engineering Structures subjected to Dynamic Seismic Loading S.N. Polukoshko 1, V.F. Gonca 2 and E.V. Uspenska 2 1 Engineering Research Institute Ventspils International
More informationAnisotropic 3D Amplitude Variation with Azimuth (AVAZ) Methods to Detect Fracture-Prone Zones in Tight Gas Resource Plays*
Anisotropic 3D Amplitude Variation with Azimuth (AVAZ) Methods to Detect Fracture-Prone Zones in Tight Gas Resource Plays* Bill Goodway 1, John Varsek 1, and Christian Abaco 1 Search and Discovery Article
More informationACCURACY OF THE SUBTRACTION MODEL USED IN SASSI
Transactions, SMiRT-22 ACCURACY OF THE SUBTRACTION MODEL USED IN SASSI 1) SC Solutions, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Mansour Tabatabaie 1 In a recent letter to the U.S. Department of Energy
More informationEXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DETERMINING DAMPING RATIO OF STEEL BRIDGES
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DETERMINING DAMPING RATIO OF STEEL BRIDGES Muharrem AKTAS 1, Serdar KUYUK 2, Cemal YILMAZ 3, Elif AGCAKOCA 4, Erkan ÇELEBİ 5 ABSTRACT Damping property of a light-weight structure
More informationAnalysis of Pile Behaviour due to Damped Vibration by Finite Element Method (FEM)
ISSN 2395-1621 Analysis of Pile Behaviour due to Damped Vibration by Finite Element Method (FEM) #1 L.M.Sardesai, #2 G.A.Kadam 1 sardesaileena@rediffmail.com.com 2 ganeshkadam07@gmail.com #1 Mechanical
More informationLATERALLY LOADED PILE GROUPS
LATERALLY LOADED PILE GROUPS Pedro Meneses Key words: Group Interaction, Lateral Response, Piles, p-multipliers, p-y Curves. Introduction The lateral resistance of pile foundations is a particularly important
More informationMoment-rotation Behavior of Shallow Foundations with Fixed Vertical Load Using PLAXIS 3D
6 th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering 1-4 November 2015 Christchurch, New Zealand Moment-rotation Behavior of Shallow Foundations with Fixed Vertical Load Using PLAXIS 3D
More informationSeismoSoil User Manual, v1.3
SeismoSoil User Manual, v1.3 SeismoSoil is a site-specific response analysis software application, which performs 1-D linear elastic, equivalent linear, and nonlinear site response analyses. By downloading
More informationSpectral-element Simulations of Elastic Wave Propagation in Exploration and Geotechnical Applications
Spectral-element Simulations of Elastic Wave Propagation in Exploration and Geotechnical Applications Lin Zheng*, Qi Zhao*, Qinya Liu, Bernd Milkereit, Giovanni Grasselli, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
More informationAnisotropic 3D Amplitude Variation with Azimuth (AVAZ) Methods to Detect Fracture Prone Zones in Tight Gas Resource Plays
Antropic 3D Amplitude Variation with Azimuth (AVAZ) Methods to Detect Fracture Prone Zones in Tight Gas Resource Plays Bill Goodway* EnCana Corp., Calgary, AB, Canada william.goodway@encana.com and John
More informationMultichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) active and passive methods
Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) active and passive methods CHOON B. PARK, RICHARD D. MILLER, JIANGHAI XIA, AND JULIAN IVANOV, Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, USA Downloaded 01/20/13 to
More informationAbstract. Introduction
A COMPARISON OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITIES OBTAINED FROM THE CROSSHOLE SEISMIC, SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES AND MULTIPLE IMPACTS OF SURFACE WAVES METHODS Patrick K. Miller, Olson Engineering, Wheat Ridge,
More informationModeling Foundations in RS
Modeling Foundations in RS 3 Piled Raft Modeling in RS 3 Deep foundation piles are commonly used to increase foundation stability and to increase the bearing capacity of structural systems. The design
More informationUser Manual and Tutorial. Version 3.7 Beta July 27, 2009
Version 3.7 Beta www.illinois.edu/~deepsoil July 27, 2009 USER MANUAL and TUTORIAL Youssef M. A. Hashash Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign hashash@illinois.edu
More informationFLAC/Slope User s Guide Contents - 1
FLAC/Slope User s Guide Contents - 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 FLAC/SLOPE 1.1 Introduction... 1-1 1.1.1 Overview... 1-1 1.1.2 Guide to the FLAC/Slope Manual... 1-2 1.1.3 Summary of Features... 1-2 1.1.4 Analysis
More informationPS User Guide Series Dispersion-Data Display
PS User Guide Series 2015 Dispersion-Data Display Prepared By Choon B. Park, Ph.D. January 2015 Table of Contents Page 1. Overview 2 2. Dispersion Curve (*.DC) 5 2.1 Files 5 2.2 Curves 6 2.3 Scale 7 2.4
More informationPLAXIS 3D Benchmark for Suction Anchor Bearing Capacity. Richard Witasse Plaxis bv
PLAXIS 3D Benchmark for Suction Anchor Bearing Capacity Richard Witasse Plaxis bv Objectives Demonstrate the capabilities of PLAXIS 3D to model suction anchor in soft clay easily and quickly Accurately
More informationMethodology for Prediction of Sliding and Rocking of Rigid Bodies Using Fast Non-Linear Analysis (FNA) Formulation
Methodology for Prediction of Sliding and Rocking of Rigid Bodies Using Fast Non-Linear Analysis (FNA) Formulation Sohrab Esfandiari - ENOVA Engineering Services Robert P. Kennedy- RPK Structural Consulting
More informationGMS 8.0 Tutorial UTEXAS Dam Profile Analysis Use UTEXAS to find the critical failure surface for a complex earth dam
v. 8.0 GMS 8.0 Tutorial Use UTEXAS to find the critical failure surface for a complex earth dam Objectives Import a CAD file and convert it to Feature Objects. Use the Feature Objects to create a UTEXAS
More informationAnalysis of the UTexas1 Passive Linear Surface Wave Dataset
Analysis of the UTexas1 Passive Linear Surface Wave Dataset Robb Eric S. Moss 1, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE 1 Dept. Civil and Environmental Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo,
More informationImplementing Machine Learning in Earthquake Engineering
CS9 MACHINE LEARNING, DECEMBER 6 Implementing Machine Learning in Earthquake Engineering Cristian Acevedo Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, CA 9435, USA Abstract The use
More informationModelling of Clay Behaviour in Pile Loading Test using One-Gravity Small-Scale Physical Model
Modelling of Clay Behaviour in Pile Loading Test using One-Gravity Small-Scale Physical Model Sulaeman, A.,a, Ling, F.N.L. 2,b, & Sajiharjo, M. 2,c Faculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein
More informationBridge Software Institute 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes six API soil models that have been implemented into the FB- MultiPier computer program according to the American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 2A LRFD
More informationPAT MEYERS R-WAVE EIGENFUNCTION ANALYSIS [REDUX]
PAT MEYERS R-WAVE EIGENFUNCTION ANALYSIS [REDUX] EVENT SELECTION EVENT SELECTION Use transient events from Gary/Ross with obvious R-wave regions Choose those r-wave regions by eye, and only use that data.
More informationUploading Data for TPV8 and TPV9 February 6, 2007
Uploading Data for TPV8 and TPV9 February 6, 2007 Contents: 1. Introduction. 2. On-Fault Time Series Data Files. 3. Off-Fault Time Series Data Files. 4. Contour Plot Data Files. 5. Using the Web Server
More information3D vs 1D vs 3x1D Ground Motions and the Earthquake Soil Structure Interaction
3D vs 1D vs 3x1D Ground Motions and the Earthquake Soil Structure Interaction Abell, Feng, Sinha, Orbović, McCallen, Jeremić UCD, LBNL, CNSC SMiRT24 Busan, Republic of Korea Outline Introduction Seismic
More information