Unclassified. RDECOM Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPC) Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Strategy 9 February 2010

Transcription

1 U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command RDECOM Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPC) Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Strategy 9 February 2010 Mr. Erik Hangeland Director, Environmental Acquisition & Logistics Sustainment Program (EALSP)

2 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 09 FEB REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED to TITLE AND SUBTITLE RDECOM Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPC) Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Strategy 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command,5183 Blackhawk Rd,Aberdeen Proving Ground,MD, PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 2010 U.S. Army Corrosion Summit, Huntsville, AL, 9-11 Feb 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 14 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

3 RDECOM Corrosion and Environmental Programs RDECOM Environmental Acquisition & Logistics Sustainment Program (EALSP) Environmental Program Mature, robust Coordination through AMC/ASA(ALT) Environmental Support Office Managed via enduring RDTE BA6 supplied by ASA(I&E) and ACSIM Efforts executed at RDECs via: EQBR (BA1) EQT (BA2-BA3) SERDP (BA2-BA3) ESTCP (BA3-BA4) NDCEE (BA4) RN08 MDEP Direct Funding (BA4) VEQT MDEP Direct Funding (BA4, BA6) Congressional and Customer Funding Corrosion Program Less mature, largely unfunded Coordination through AMC G-4/7/9 and DASA(AP&L) Currently managed via unprogrammed OSD and Supplemental funding Efforts currently executed via: Limited OSD funding (BA4, O&M) Congressional and Customer Funding Need for more robust RDTE program Leveraging/Integration Paints Coatings Plating Pre-treatments Alloys Composites

4 Technology Program Development Team HQ, RDECOM Environmental Acquisition & Logistics Sustainment Program AMRDEC ARL ECBC TARDEC AMCOM Corrosion Program Camouflage, Coatings & Corrosion Team Environmental Quality Office Materials, Environmental & Corrosion Team ARDEC CERDEC NSRDEC Advanced Materials Branch / Army Corrosion Office Environmental Science & Technology Program

5 Capability Gap Identification Panel Weapons Systems Experts PEO Ammunition PEO Aviation PEO Command, Control and Communications-Tactical* PEO Combat Support and Combat Service Support PEO Ground Combat Systems PEO Missiles and Space PEO Soldier JPEO Chemical and Biological Defense* PM Future Combat Systems Joint Munitions and Lethality LCMC Communications-Electronics Command LCMC *Invited Corrosion Experts Non-RDECOM Army civilians Other service RDT&E laboratories Support contractors

6 Coordination Outside the Army Academia OSU National Academies NRC UNI EMU NAE NDSU Universities NAS UVA Automotive Aerospace Akron Comm. UH Construction Equipment So. Miss. Industry Sectors USN RDECOM EALSP Infrastructure Materials Surface Coatings Textiles USMC OSD Director, Corrosion Policy & Oversight USAF USCG NACE FSCT Industry SAE DLA GSA Trade & Scientific Associations NPCA Government ASTM MPI NASA SSPC

7 Proposed Program Requirements Corrosion RDT&E Capability Gaps 1. Prevention of corrosion through product improvements for fielded systems 2. Assessment and correction of corrosion through field-level maintenance 3. Prevention of corrosion through design for new acquisition 4. Prevention of corrosion during operation and operational storage 5. Prevention of corrosion during long term storage or warehousing 6. Prevention of corrosion during transportation or temporary storage 7. Fulfillment of data gaps to accelerate mature technology qualification Funding Needs, in Then-Year Dollars (thousands $) FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 Total 5,824 12,941 20,859 21,235 21,617 22,007

8 Gap 1 Capability Gap 1: Prevention of corrosion through product improvements for fielded systems Item No Supporting Capability Improved corrosion preventive products such as paints, sealants, lubricants, etc. Guidance for optimal application of corrosion preventive products for different systems and environments Techniques for depot-level repair of new materials and processes introduced during new production Passive methods for preventing corrosive contaminants from adhering to equipment surfaces

9 Gap 2 Capability Gap 2: Assessment and correction of corrosion through field-level maintenance Item No. Supporting Capability 2.1 Techniques for identifying under-paint corrosion of substrates Techniques for monitoring corrosion of hidden/inaccessible components or compartments Techniques for field-level repair and retouch of new materials and processes introduced during RESET 2.4 Field expedient removal of water from engine oil

10 Gap 3 Capability Gap 3: Prevention of corrosion through design for new acquisition Item No. 3.1 Supporting Capability Accelerated corrosion test methods for full systems, assemblies and components 3.2 Accelerated corrosion test methods for test panels Guidance and tools for assessing corrosion prevention during prototype design reviews Guidance and tools for assuring adherence of production items to prototype CPC plans 3.5 Guidance for corrosion prevention best practices on all known substrates Guidance for corrosion prevention best practices developed in conjunction with new material development Demonstration of the quantitative benefits of addressing corrosion through design vice corrective action Analysis of how to establish and measure corrosion metrics in system requirements documents 3.9 Analysis of corrosion effects on conductivity of electrical connectors

11 Gap 4 Capability Gap 4: Prevention of corrosion during operation and operational storage Item No. Supporting Capability 4.1 Field expedient methods for keeping equipment clean and dry Guidance for optimal washing/drying procedures for different systems and environments Analysis of corrosion impacts caused by different basing strategies/locations

12 Gap 5 Capability Gap 5: Prevention of corrosion during long term storage or warehousing Item No. Supporting Capability Guidance for optimal long term storage for different systems and environments Alternative dehumidification techniques not based on air conditioning Alternative preservation techniques not based on dehumidification

13 Gap 6 Capability Gap 6: Prevention of corrosion during transportation or temporary storage Item No. Supporting Capability 6.1 Improved packaging materials and techniques Guidance for optimal packaging materials and techniques for different systems and environments Secondary protection techniques after removal of items from primary packaging

14 Gap 7 Capability Gap 7: Fulfillment of data gaps to accelerate mature technology qualification Item No. Supporting Capability 7.1 Compilation of lessons learned during upgrades to fielded systems Toolbox of available technologies and techniques for original equipment manufacturers Identification of actual corrosion performance requirements for hexavalent chromium and cadmium alternatives in common applications Data to support implementation decisions for mature hexavalent chromium and cadmium alternatives 7.5 Non-corrosive methods for individual unit identification marking

15 Mr. Erik Hangeland U.S. Army RDECOM Director, Environmental Acquisition and Logistics Sustainment Program (office)