Selenium Workshop. Removing the Mystery from Open Source Test Automation. Presented By Chris Petrov, PMP Leverage Point Corporation

Transcription

1 Selenium Workshop Removing the Mystery from Open Source Test Automation Presented By Chris Petrov, PMP Leverage Point Corporation SCQAA Orange County September 17th, 2013 Leverage Point Corporation 417B W. Foothill Blvd. #164 Glendora, CA

2 Leverage Point Corporation "We will provide the best people, both technically and in customer focus, to deliver specialized high-value and indispensable IT services. Each of our employees will maintain a singular focus on using all of their experience, skill and creativity to ensure the quality, performance and reliability of our customer s critical business applications. Founded in 2006 Specialize In Software Quality Assurance Consulting and Staffing Outsourced Testing Test Automation Framework Development Testing Project Support

3 The Rise of Open Source Tools Cost cutting in IT departments Rise of lean startups Improved maturity of open source software Backing by major companies Google, IBM Cloud solutions versus in-house Price of commercial software increasing Value propositions of commercial solutions do not materialize Key factors for consideration in selecting Selenium as your test automation tool versus commercial tools

4 Is Selenium Right for You? Cost/Support Cost FREE!!! The cost of learning curve and development may be significant Support Mature user groups Google group Stack Exchange SeleniumHQ Multitude of solutions just a search away Helpful people Commercial support available at various price points

5 Is Selenium Right for You? -Functionality Supports major browsers Firefox, Chrome, IE, Safari, mobile browsers on Android Support of new versions of the browsers faster than commercial tools Supports major web frameworks Rails, J2EE, ASP.NET, Etc. Web Only does not support: Desktop Applications Java Applets Flash ActiveX

6 Is Selenium Right for You? -Testing Application Architecture Web based or mostly web based? Simple pages with MVC or complex workflows? Testing Methodology Unit Tests over a single web page Business Cycle Tests System Tests

7 Is Selenium Right for You? -Resources Resource Availability Do you have trained resources? Can your QA write simple code? Language Proficiency Java, Python, Ruby, C#, JavaScript? Organization Capability Can you get resources? Can you get enough time? Collaboration with developers? Is organization committed to automation success? Ongoing support with time and money?

8 Selenium Overview -Architecture Selenium IDE Simple Record and Playback Scripts JavaScript Based Available only in Firefox WebDriver Java Library giving you command of the browser Supports all major browsers Code the scripts Extensions Custom JavaScript Additional Libraries Selenium Grid

9 Selenium Overview Use Models Selenium IDE Scripts Selenium IDE Scripts converted to WebDriver code Coded Tests with WebDriver Extract reusable parts as separate functions In-House Framework Design Rudimentary Data Driven Keyword Driven Low or High Level Keywords Third Party Frameworks Many choices available with various pricing and capabilities

10 Use Models Selenium IDE Resource Requirements Minimal training, some JavaScript knowledge Ease of Implementation Easy for simple pages, almost impossible for complex ones Ease of Test Development Very Easy for simple scripts, very difficult for complex scripts Ease of Test Maintenance Very Difficult Cost and ROI Low initial cost, High over time -Low ROI Test Robustness Very Low

11 Use Models Selenium IDE Who should consider this Use Model? No trained Resources No time to develop complex test frameworks Testing simple applications Mature GUI Who should avoid this Use Model? Testing Complex Applications Volatile User Interface Organizations focused on long-term Automation ROI

12 Use Models Coded Tests Resource Requirements Selenium Training, Programming, Tool Development Ease of Implementation Moderate for simple pages, moderate for complex ones Ease of Test Development Moderate for simple scripts, Moderate for complex Ease of Test Maintenance Difficult Cost and ROI High initial cost, High over time -Low ROI Test Robustness Very High based on automation engineers abilities

13 Use Models Coded Tests Who should consider this Use Model? QA with junior programming backgrounds Lack of Test Automation Architect Mature GUI More complex test requirements Reusability Error handling Who should avoid this Use Model? Organizations with automation framework expertise Volatile User Interface Organizations focused on long-term Automation ROI

14 Use Models In-House Framework Resource Requirements Good Test Automation Architect, Dedicated Test Automation Team Ease of Implementation Very Difficult Ease of Test Development Easy Ease of Test Maintenance Easy Cost and ROI Very High Initial Cost, Low Over Time High ROI Test Robustness Very High or as needed

15 Use Models In-House Framework Who should consider this Use Model? Availability of good Test Automation Architect Executive level commitment to long term test automation success Complex Application Architecture Who should avoid this Use Model? Organizations without test automation framework expertise Organizations focused on short term Automation gains

16 Use Models Third Party Framework Resource Requirements Test Design and Application Knowledge Ease of Implementation Easy but depends on the framework Ease of Test Development Easy Ease of Test Maintenance Easy Cost and ROI Variable initial cost, Low over time -Very High ROI Test Robustness Variable but generally Very High

17 Use Models Third Party Framework Who should consider this Use Model? Organizations in need of fast improvement of quality Organizations without established test automation department Management commitment to long term test automation success Volatile GUI Complex Application Architecture Who should avoid this Use Model? Organizations with robust established open source test automation solution

18 Suitability of Selenium in a Framework Opportunities in using Selenium Extensibility by third party libraries Fast Patches Multitude of Languages Unified Library Interface Comparison with commercial tools Challenges in using Selenium Desktop Interaction Somewhat harder debugging Uneven Language Support C#

19 Questions? Leverage Point Corporation Copyright 2013