Initial release of specifications for AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 (CFER-CP V1.0)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Initial release of specifications for AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 (CFER-CP V1.0)"

Transcription

1 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Technical Specifications for Data Submission from PSO to PSOPPC AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 December 2016

2 Revision History Revision Date 12/2016 Notes Initial release of specifications for AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 (CFER-CP V1.0) AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 2 of 45

3 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION Objectives Audience Program Overview Data Submission Overview Supporting Documentation COMMUNITY PHARMACY PATIENT SAFETY REPORT Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report Validation Data Set Complete/Rejected Report APPROACH Conventions Used in This Specification Conformance Requirements XPath Notation Keywords XML Examples XML Elements, Attributes and Values in CDA Succession Management File Size Limitations File Name Limitations Use of Object Identifiers Overview of HL7 OID Management AHRQ Common Formats OID Structure Vocabularies and Value Sets Vocabulary and Value Set Example using AHRQ Common Formats Code System Vocabulary and Value Set Example Using a Standard Code System Use of Templates Document-Level Templates Section-Level Templates Entry-Level Templates Validation of CDA XML files CDA FILE STRUCTURE Major Components of a Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report Initial XML Elements Document Element Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report CDA Header Constraints Header Elements Header Participants Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report CDA Body Constraints Community Pharmacy Event Section Constraints Narrative Block Community Pharmacy Event Constraints Clinical Statement Templates MoU Representation of Data Elements in CDA Sections REFERENCES AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 3 of 45

4 List of Figures Figure 1. ClinicalDocument Example Figure 2. Example of Elements, Attributes and Values Figure 3. Example of Use of Data Element ID, Answer Codes, Value Sets and Code Systems Figure 4. Value Set OID Structure Figure 5. Example of Use of Standard Code Systems Figure 6. Template OID Structure Example Figure 7. CDA Entry-Level Template Identifier Example Figure 8. Major Components of a Community Pharmacy CDA Document Figure 9. Initial XML Elements Example Figure 10. ClinicalDocument Element Example Figure 11. ClinicalDocument/typeId Example Figure 12. ClinicalDocument/templateId Example Figure 13. ClinicalDocument/id Example Figure 14. ClinicalDocument/code Example Figure 15. ClinicalDocument/title Example Figure 16. effectivetime Example Figure 17. effectivetime Unknown Example Figure 18. confidentialitycode Example Figure 19. setid Example Figure 20. versionnumber Example Figure 21. recordtarget and administrativegendercode in an Incident Report with One Patient Example 29 Figure 22. Unknown administrativegendercode in an Incident Report Example Figure 23. recordtarget Example for a Near Miss or Unsafe Condition Report Figure 24. author Example Figure 25. custodian Example Figure 26. structuredbody Example Figure 27. Narrative Block within a Section Example Figure 28. Community Pharmacy Event Section in an Incident Report Involves Two Medications Figure 29. MoU Observation Element - CD Data Type Single Answer Value Example (AHRQ Common Formats Code System) Figure 30. MoU Observation Element CD Data Type Single Answer Value Example (RxNorm Code System) Figure 31. MoU Observation Element - CD Data Type Single Answer Value Example (NDC Code System) Figure 32. MoU Observation Element - CD Data Type "Other: Please Specify" Example Figure 33. MoU Observation Element CD Data Type Multiple Answer Values Example Figure 34. MoU Observation Element - CD Data Type Unknown Answer Value Example Figure 35. MoU Observation Element ED Data Type Example Figure 36. MoU Observation Element ED Data Type Example Showing Submission of Unknown Figure 37. MoU Observation Element TS Data Type Example Figure 38. MoU Observation Element TS Data Type Example Showing Submission of Unknown AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 4 of 45

5 List of Tables Table 1. Keywords Table 2. Illegal Characters in a Well-Formed XML Table 3. AHRQ Common Formats OID Structure Table 4. Vocabulary and Value Set Example using the AHRQ Common Formats Code System Table 5. Vocabulary and Value Set Example Using a Standard Code System Table 6. Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Patient Safety Report Related Template OIDs Table 7. Document-Level Templates for Community Pharmacy Report Type Table 8. Community Pharmacy Report Types Table 9. Sex Code Value Set Table 10. Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report Section and Section-Level Template ID Table 11. Community Pharmacy Event-Level Data Elements Common to All Medications Table 12. Medication-Specific Data Elements AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 5 of 45

6 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objectives The primary objective of this document is to provide the specifications for the required file format and data elements for transmitting Common Formats Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report data from Patient Safety Organizations (PSOs) to the Patient Safety Organization Privacy Protection Center (PSOPPC). 1.2 Audience This document is written to serve the following audiences: Patient Safety Organizations (PSOs) Software Vendors Community Pharmacies Readers should be familiar with XML, HL7 and CDA standards. 1.3 Program Overview The Common Formats, published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, were created as part of the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 (Patient Safety Act). AHRQ has coordinated the development of the Common Formats for Event Reporting to facilitate the voluntary collection of patient safety event information. For more information on the Common Formats, refer to the Common Formats landing page on the PSOPPC Web Site ( The Common Formats are intended to be used to gather information on a patient safety event in order to create a Common Formats Patient Safety Report (hereinafter referenced to as report ). Reports may be submitted to the PSOPPC for data nonidentification and transmission to the Network of Patient Safety Databases (NPSD). 1.4 Data Submission Overview Patient safety event data shall be transmitted to the PSOPPC using the Extensible Markup Language (XML) file format. The XML file shall conform to the Health Level Seven (HL7) Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2.0 (CDA R2) standard. This document provides the XML CDA file specifications for transmission of reports to the PSOPPC using the AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 (CFER-CP V1.0) data elements. Transmission of the report CDA XML files by PSOs to the PSOPPC shall be performed using the secure pages of the PSOPPC website ( Access to the secure pages of the PSOPPC website requires a PSOPPC website user account. Please contact the PSOPPC Help Desk at or at support@psoppc.org for more information on obtaining a PSOPPC website user account. AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 6 of 45

7 1.5 Supporting Documentation The following documents are integral to this specification and are available on the PSOPPC Web Site ( from the Technical Specifications page for Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 ( Community Pharmacy Resources Workbook The Community Pharmacy Resources Workbook complements the Implementation Guide and provides information about the data elements that will assist with the development of a report CDA XML file. It also contains the validation rules that will be applied to the data elements and the associated answer values submitted to the PSOPPC. Community Pharmacy Flow Chart The Community Pharmacy Flow Chart complements the Implementation Guide and provides the data elements and associated answer values (where applicable) that are required or recommended to be answered based on the report type and event category associated with the report. The various paths of the data elements identify the valid data elements to be included within a report. Community Pharmacy CDA XML File Samples The Community Pharmacy sample CDA XML files provide sample patient safety events and the associated CDA XML file output. The sample CDA XML files contain all recommended data elements for a complete report and conform to the Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Technical Specifications. Community Pharmacy Data Dictionary A data dictionary is also available on the Technical Specifications page for Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 on the PSOPPC Web Site. The Data Dictionary further defines the data elements and their attributes (data element name, data element ID, answer values, answer codes, HL7 data type, guide for use, etc.). AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 7 of 45

8 2 COMMUNITY PHARMACY PATIENT SAFETY REPORT A report shall consist of the data elements, and associated answer values (where applicable) as defined in these specifications. Each report shall be submitted in a single XML file. An XML file shall contain only one report. 2.1 Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report Each report shall be classified as one of the following report types: Incident: A patient safety event that reached the patient, whether or not the patient was harmed. Near Miss: A patient safety event that did not reach the patient. Unsafe Condition: Any circumstance that increases the probability of a patient safety event. The data elements for a complete report are defined in the Community Pharmacy Flow Chart. Refer to Section 1.5, Supporting Documentation, for more information on the Community Pharmacy Flow Chart. 2.2 Validation Data Set The Community Pharmacy Flow Chart specifies the data elements necessary for a complete report. All data elements for a complete report are required to be included in a patient safety event CDA XML file for acceptance by the PSOPPC. CDA XML files missing any of the required data elements will be rejected by the PSOPPC. 2.3 Complete/Rejected Report When a report meets the file specifications and validation rules, and includes all of the required data elements specified by the Community Pharmacy Flow Chart for the report type, the file will be accepted by the PSOPPC with an Accepted: Complete status. Files that receive an Accepted: Complete status meet all of the technical specifications for Community Pharmacy Version 1.0. A report that does not meet the files specifications or validation rules will be rejected by the PSOPPC with a Rejected status. Data from rejected files will not be used to aggregate counts of patient safety concerns by type at the national level. The submission report page on PSOPPC website ( provides the submission processing status and associated error messages. AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 8 of 45

9 3 APPROACH 3.1 Conventions Used in This Specification Requirements are expressed as conformance statements, which are constraints on the base standard. The base standard for this specification is the HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2.0 (CDA R2). Though effort is made to describe all the aspects of applicable CDA R2, every aspect of the CDA R2 may not be described in this specification. Each CDA XML file shall be in the valid XML file format. Where no conformance requirements are stated in this specification, the CDA files are subject to and are to be created in accordance with the base CDA R2 specification. The CDA R2 specification is available from the secure area of the HL7 website at the following location Access to the specification requires HL7 membership. This specification, at a minimum, expects implementers to be familiar with the development and management of XML files. It also assumes familiarity and experience with validating XML files against XML schemas (.XSD documents). Knowledge of the CDA specification is helpful but not required for implementation. Additionally, experience with software development processes is expected Conformance Requirements Conformance statements provide the constraints on the XML elements, their attributes and the valid value sets applicable to the elements and the attributes. The conformance requirements for this specification are numbered sequentially and are displayed as shown in the following example: CONF-CF-example1: Conformance statement numbering and format within this specification for a CDA XML file. The format of the fonts within the conformance statements is as follows: XML elements, attributes, and standard attribute values shall be represented using the Courier New font with a font size of 10. SHALL SHOULD MAY and STATIC DYNAMIC are keywords and shall be represented using the ARIAL FONT in Bold with a font size of 10 in small caps. The value set constraints are specified as either static, meaning that they are bound to a specified version of a value set, or DYNAMIC, meaning that they are bound to the most current version of a value set. Examples of syntax for the vocabulary binding to DYNAMIC or STATIC value sets where applicable are as follows (these are example conformance statements only): CONF-CF-example2: The value for pathname of coded element (SHALL SHOULD MAY) be selected from ValueSet valuesetoid localvaluesetname codesystemoid [codesystemname] (DYNAMIC STATIC). CONF-CF-example3: The value for observation/value/@code SHALL be selected from ICD-9CM (diagnosis codes) DYNAMIC. AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 9 of 45

10 CONF-CF-example4: The value for SHALL be selected from ValueSet CFSexCode (CodeSystem: HL7AdministrativeGender) STATIC. The majority of the value sets have a STATIC set of answer values defined within the AHRQ Common Formats Code System or within one of the standard vocabulary systems (e.g. SNOMED CT, LOINC etc.). Value sets that have a STATIC set of answer values are provided within the Answers tab of the Community Pharmacy Resources Workbook. The effective date for all the static ValueSets within this specification corresponds to the publication date of the Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Technical Specifications. Value sets that have a dynamic set of answer values (such as RxNorm codes) are derived from the respective vocabulary systems. A simplified constraint is used when binding to a single code. Examples of syntax for vocabulary binding to a single code where applicable are as follows: CONF-CF-example5: The value for pathname of coded element (SHALL SHOULD MAY) be "code" [displayname] codesystemoid [codesystemname] STATIC. CONF-CF-example6: The value for ClinicalDocument/confidentialityCode/@code SHALL be "N" Normal (CodeSystem: HL7Confidentiality) STATIC. In the example conformance statements above, the elements provided in [ ] are optional. Words separated by the " " character are to be read as an "or" within the statement XPath Notation Instead of the traditional dotted notation used by HL7 to represent Reference Information Model (RIM) classes, this document uses XML Path Language (XPath) notation in conformance statements and elsewhere to identify the XML elements and attributes within the CDA document instance in which various constraints are applied. The implicit context of these expressions is the root of the document. The purpose of using this notation is to provide a mechanism that will be familiar to developers for identifying parts of an XML document Keywords The keywords SHALL, SHOULD, MAY, NEED NOT, SHOULD NOT and SHALL NOT, in this document are to be interpreted as described in the HL7 Version 3 Publishing Facilitator s Guide ( it&projectnumber=295). To convey the sense of: Table 1. Keywords Use the following: Required/Mandatory SHALL SHALL NOT Best Practice/Recommendation SHOULD SHOULD NOT Acceptable/Permitted MAY NEED NOT AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 10 of 45

11 3.1.4 XML Examples XML examples appear in various figures in this document in a fixed-width font, as shown in the example in Figure 1. Portions of the XML content may be omitted from the examples for brevity, marked by an ellipsis ( ) as shown in the example in Figure 1. Figure 1. <!--ClinicalDocument example--> <ClinicalDocument xmlns="urn:hl7-org:v3"... </ClinicalDocument> ClinicalDocument Example XPath expressions are used in the narrative and conformance requirements to identify elements because they are familiar to many XML implementers XML Elements, Attributes and Values in CDA Each CDA XML file is made up of elements, element values, attributes and attribute values. In the example in Figure 2, component, observation, templateid, etc. are elements. classcode and moodcode are attributes of the observation element. "OBS" is an attribute value of the classcode attribute. "EVN" is an attribute value of the moodcode attribute. The text "Wrong medication in container" is a value for the value element. Figure 2. Example of Elements, Attributes and Values <component> <observation classcode="obs" moodcode="evn"> <templateid root=" "/> <code code="de15" displayname="briefly describe the event that occurred or unsafe condition:" codesystem=" " codesystemname="ahrq Common Formats"/> <value xsi:type="ed" mediatype="text/plain"> Wrong medication in container. </value> </observation> The element names, attribute names and attribute values are case sensitive. The element values (which are used for user entered free text response to data elements) are case insensitive. AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 11 of 45

12 The following characters when used within attribute or element values may make an XML file invalid. To ensure that the XML files are valid, these characters should be replaced by an entity reference: Table 2. Illegal Characters in a Well-Formed XML Illegal Characters Entity Reference Description < < Less than > > Greater than & &amp Ampersand &apos; Apostrophe " " Quotation mark Succession Management This specification allows updates to previously submitted reports by replacing a previously submitted file with an updated file. A report is uniquely identified by a combination of the PSO Identifier (PSO OID), Provider Identifier and Event Identifier. Each report shall have a version number, stored as an integer, which shall be incremented for subsequent versions of the report (Refer to Section for more information on the report version). Every report (whether an updated version of a previously submitted report or a new report submission) being submitted to the PSOPPC, shall always have a new ClinicalDocument/id representing a unique identifier for the document. For submitting an update to a previously submitted report, the updated CDA file shall have the same PSO Identifier (setid/@root and custodian elements), Provider Identifier (author element) and Event Identifier (setid/@extension element) as the previously submitted CDA file, but an incremented version number (versionnumber element) than the version number of the previously submitted report. Previously submitted data shall be overwritten by the updated data submitted in the most recent successful CDA file submission for the same event report. Appending new data to previously submitted files is not allowed within this specification File Size Limitations Report XML files can be submitted individually, submitted as multiple individual files, or grouped together into one or more zip files. Each submission (either individual files, or zip files) shall not be greater than 80 MB File Name Limitations Report XML and zip files (.zip file extensions only) must conform to the following file naming specifications: The file name shall be less than 45 characters in length. The file name shall not include any of the following characters: \ / & *? " < > AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 12 of 45

13 3.2 Use of Object Identifiers Object Identifiers (OIDs) are unique identifiers used to identify the different objects (sections, entries, templates, etc.) and entities (PSOs, Reports etc.) within the CDA XML file specification. OIDs are used in HL7 documents, such as the CDA and HL7 messages, to add global uniqueness to identifiers used within the document. They are also used to identify the vocabulary terminology systems, such as SNOMED and RxNorm, used in the documents and messages Overview of HL7 OID Management The approach used for the CDA file specifications is adopted from HL7 OID management which states: Object Identifier (OID) Definition: An OID is a globally unique string representing an ISO (International Organization for Standardization) identifier in a form that consists only of numbers and dots (e.g., " "). OIDs are paths in a tree structure, with the left-most number representing the root and the right-most number representing a leaf. Each branch under the root corresponds to an assigning authority. Each of these assigning authorities may, in turn, designate its own set of assigning authorities that work under its auspices, and so on down the line. Eventually, one of these authorities assigns a unique number that corresponds to a leaf node on the tree. The leaf may represent an instance of an object. An assigning authority owns a namespace, consisting of its sub-tree. OIDs are the preferred scheme for unique identifiers in HL7. HL7 Version 3 artifacts use OIDs to identify coding schemes and identifier namespaces. OIDs can be allocated by any organization using a unique OID root AHRQ Common Formats OID Structure The OIDs used in this specification are extended from the AHRQ OID. The OID used to identify AHRQ is: The Common Formats OID is extended from the AHRQ OID and is Table 3 provides the AHRQ and the AHRQ Common Formats OIDs as well as the OIDs extended from the AHRQ Common Formats OID for use within this specification. Table 3. AHRQ Common Formats OID Structure OID OID Value OID Description AHRQ OID The OID used to identify AHRQ. AHRQ Common Formats Root OID This is the root OID for this specification. All other OIDs are derived as branches of this root OID. Common Formats PSO Root OID See section Common Formats PSO Root OID Common Formats ValueSet Root OID See section 3.3 Vocabularies and Value Sets Common Formats Template Root OID See section 3.4 Use of Templates Common Formats Code System OID See section 3.3 Vocabularies and Value Sets AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 13 of 45

14 Common Formats PSO Root OID Each PSO shall be identified by a unique OID. The unique OID for each PSO shall be created using a combination of the PSO Root OID ( ) and the PSO ID (e.g. P0023) assigned by AHRQ. The PSO OID is collected as data element ID DE4, which is an Encapsulated Data Type found in the CDA XML Header. The AHRQ-assigned PSO ID for each PSO begins with the letter P, followed by 4 numeric characters e.g. P0023. The PSO ID is assigned to the PSO upon official listing by AHRQ. The PSO shall create their PSO OID using the following convention: The numeric value (not including any preceding zeros) of the PSO ID is appended to the PSO Root OID ( ). The PSO Root OID and the numeric value of the PSO ID shall be separated by a period. For example, the PSO OID for a PSO with an AHRQ-assigned PSO ID of P0023 would be: Throughout this guide we use PSO P0023 in the examples. PSOs will need to replace this value with their own PSO ID. 3.3 Vocabularies and Value Sets Vocabularies are sets of terms (represented by codes) that may be in general use (standard codes) or created locally (local codes). A value set is a subset of the vocabulary and contains a list of intended values appropriate for a data element. In CDA, vocabularies, and value sets are represented using Object Identifiers (OIDs) as illustrated in the examples in Table 4 and Table 5. Data elements are represented either by values from a value set or by a free text narrative response. The values for data elements that have a value set are identified either by using codes from a standard vocabulary or code system (e.g. RxNorm, LOINC, ICD-9CM (diagnosis codes/procedure codes), ICD-10CM (diagnosis codes/procedure codes), etc.), or when the values do not exist in any standard vocabularies, by defining local codes for them within the AHRQ Common Formats Code System. The AHRQ Common Formats Code System assigns a unique identifier (Data Element ID) to each data element. The Data Element ID along with its associated value set provides a complete representation of a data element. Each code system is identified by a unique OID, which is used to identify the code system within the CDA XML file. The AHRQ Common Formats Code System is identified by the following OID: Each unique value set is represented by an OID that uniquely identifies the value set. The OID for each unique value set in this specification is a branch of the value set subroot OID (Answer ValueSet Root). The example in Table 4 shows the value set OID for the Data Element DE285 (Type of Nutritional Products) as , which is a branch of the value set sub-root OID The Data Element ID, associated answer codes (both from standard code systems and the AHRQ Common Formats Code System), answer values, value set OIDs, and code systems for each data element within the AHRQ Common Formats are provided in the Community Pharmacy Resources Workbook. AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 14 of 45

15 3.3.1 Vocabulary and Value Set Example using AHRQ Common Formats Code System Table 4 provides an example of a data element (Nutritional products/food) that is represented by a set of values encoded using local codes defined within the AHRQ Common Formats Code System. Table 4. Vocabulary and Value Set Example using the AHRQ Common Formats Code System Data Element ID: DE285 Data Element Name: Type of Nutritional Product Value Set OID: Answer Answer Value Code System Code System Name Code A1242 Dietary supplement (other than vitamins or minerals) AHRQ Common Formats A1245 Vitamins or minerals AHRQ Common Formats A1248 Enteral nutritional products AHRQ Common Formats A1249 Medical food AHRQ Common Formats Figure 3 provides an implementation sample of the vocabulary and value sets example illustrated above in Table 4. Figure 3. Example of Use of Data Element ID, Answer Codes, Value Sets and Code Systems <!--data element Ids, answer codes, value sets and code systems example--> <observation classcode="obs" moodcode="evn"> <code code="de285" displayname="type of Nutritional Product: codesystem=" " codesystemname="ahrq Common Formats"/> <value xsi:type="cd" code="a1245" displayname="vitamins or minerals " codesystem=" " codesystemname="ahrq Common Formats"/> </observation> Figure 4 summarizes the Value Set OID structure. Figure 4. Value Set OID Structure AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 15 of 45

16 3.3.2 Vocabulary and Value Set Example Using a Standard Code System Table 5 provides an example of a data element (Patient Sex) which is represented by a set of values encoded using codes from the HL7 Administrative Gender code. Table 5. Vocabulary and Value Set Example Using a Standard Code System Data Element ID: DE1106 Data Element Name: Sex Value Set: CFSex Value Set OID: Answer Code Answer Value Code System Code System Name M Male HL7 Administrative Gender F Female HL7 Administrative Gender For further information about the standard code systems used within this specification, please refer to Section 5 (References) of this document which provides relevant links to the code systems. Figure 5 provides an implementation sample of the vocabulary and value sets encoded using codes from the HL7 Administrative Gender code example illustrated in Table 5. Figure 5. Example of Use of Standard Code Systems <!--administrativegendercode shall be the sex (DE1106) of the patient--> <recordtarget> <patientrole> <id root=" " extension="1"/> <patient> <administrativegendercode code="m"codesystem=" "/> </patient> </patientrole> </recordtarget> AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 16 of 45

17 3.4 Use of Templates Templates are used to define a set of rules or constraints that can be applied to different parts of a CDA document. When used in a CDA document, the template identifier (templateid) signals the imposition of a set of template-defined constraints. The value of the templateid attribute provides a unique identifier for the templates in question. Within the CDA file, templates can be applied at the document-level, section-level and entrylevel to constrain the generic CDA specification. Document-level templates assert conformance to the constraints defined for a full document. Section-level templates assert conformance to the constraints defined for document sections. Entry-level templates assert conformance to the constraints defined for CDA entries. A report makes use of templates to define constraints that apply to the entire report (document-level template) or to specific report types (document-level templates that apply to an Incident, Near Miss, or Unsafe Condition reports) and to CDA entries (entrylevel templates that apply to each data element observation (e.g. medication type, harm, etc.)). Template identifiers are critical in this specification and are required to be included within the CDA document as defined within the specification. Submission of reports that do not conform to the template identifier constraints defined within this specification may be rejected as nonconformant. The template structure for this specification is provided in Figure 6 below. Figure 6. Template OID Structure Example Users requiring additional assistance in viewing examples, may contact the PSOPPC Help Desk at or at AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 17 of 45

18 Table 6 lists all Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report Version 1.0 related template OIDs. Table 6. Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Patient Safety Report Related Template OIDs Template Name Template OID Document-Level Template Name / Document Name Patient Safety Report (Generic constraints) Incident Report Near Miss Report Unsafe Condition Report Section-Level Template Name / Section Name Community Pharmacy Entry-Level Template Name Model of Meaning Data Element Patterns N/A Model of Use Data Element Patterns Model of Use Observation element Document-Level Templates Document-level templates define two kinds of constraint sets applicable to the full document instance. Document-level templates use the templateid element in the CDA header. The Community Pharmacy CDA XML document is identified by two document-level templates Patient Safety Report Generic constraints , and one of the three report type constraints: Incident Report Near Miss Report Unsafe Condition Report Section-Level Templates Section-level templates define constraints that apply to the CDA sections within the body of the CDA document. The section-level templates define the constraints related to the section and the data elements included within the specific section. This template identifies constraints such as The Community Pharmacy section MAY contain one title element valued with the following case-insensitive, text string Community Pharmacy. There is only one section for a Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report: Community Pharmacy Event section Entry-Level Templates CDA entries represent the structured components within a document section. When included in a document section, each data element represented by a CDA element (e.g. observation, procedure, etc.) becomes an entry within the document. Each section can contain one or more entries. Each data element may have a set of constraints defined within the template. For details, please refer to Section 4.5 Clinical Statement Templates. AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 18 of 45

19 Figure 7 is an example of using the AHRQ Model of Use Observation entry-level template: Figure 7. CDA Entry-Level Template Identifier Example <!--entry-level template identifier example--> <section>... <component> <observation classcode="obs" moodcode="evn"> <!--Indicating conformance to entry-level template constraints for AHRQ Model of Use Observation--> <templateid root=" "/> <code code="de1100" displayname="event Date:" codesystem=" " codesystemname="ahrq Common Formats"/> <value xsi:type="ts" value=" "/> <!--Format here is YYYYMMDD--> </observation>... </section> AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 19 of 45

20 3.5 Validation of CDA XML files Validation of a CDA file against the CDA R2 schema (CDA.xsd) can be done using freely available CDA validation tools on the web ( Validation against the CDA.xsd allows the submitter to validate that their CDA file can be performed against the CDA R2 schema to ensure that the file conforms to the basic CDA specifications. Any errors generated during this validation must be corrected before submission to the PSOPPC. The PSOPPC shall perform a comprehensive validation for every CDA file submitted. The validation includes conformity with the CDA schema, in addition to compliance to the conformance statements provided in the AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide and the Common Formats validation rules provided in Community Pharmacy Resources Workbook. Error messages generated as part of file processing and the processing status ( Accepted: Complete, or Rejected ) are available to the submitting organization through submission reports. Submission reports are accessible from the secure pages of the PSOPPC website. Upon processing completion at the PSOPPC, the submitter will receive an indicating their files have been processed. The notification contains the status of the processed files and notifies the user that any associated error messages (critical errors or informational warnings) are available in the submission reports. Submitters should review their submission reports to identify the processing status of submitted files and to view any associated error or warning messages. If a file is rejected, the submitter is encouraged to review the error messages, fix any errors, and resubmit the file to the PSOPPC. AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 20 of 45

21 4 CDA FILE STRUCTURE This section describes the major components of a CDA document and the initial set of elements to be included in each CDA XML file. 4.1 Major Components of a Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report A CDA document is wrapped by the ClinicalDocument element and contains a header and a body. Major components of a CDA document are shown in the skeletal example in Figure 8. Note: Many required components are missing to simplify the example. The header lies between the ClinicalDocument and the structuredbody elements and provides the following: Ability to identify and classify the document Ability to provide information on authentication, the encounter, the patient and the involved provider The CDA XML body contains the Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Event section. Within a document section, the narrative block represents content to be rendered, whereas CDA entries represent structured content provided for further computer processing. CDA entries typically encode content present in the narrative block of the same section. For complete samples of Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report CDA XML, please refer to Community Pharmacy CDA XML File Samples. Figure 8. Major Components of a Community Pharmacy CDA Document <!--major components of a CDA document--> <ClinicalDocument xmlns="urn:hl7-org:v3" xmlns:voc="urn:hl7-org:v3/voc" xmlns:xsi= xsi:schemalocation="urn:hl7-org:v3 CDA.xsd"> <!--Start of Header-->...CDA Header Elements... <!--End of Header--> <!--Start of Body--> <component> <structuredbody> <! Start of Community Pharmacy Event Section --> <component> <section> <id root=" "/>... Community Pharmacy Event Elements... </section> <!--End of Community Pharmacy Event Section --> </structuredbody> <!--End of Body--> </ClinicalDocument> AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 21 of 45

22 4.1.1 Initial XML Elements Each CDA file SHALL begin with the xml element where the value The CDA file MAY also contain the xml-stylesheet element where the value and the value as shown in Figure 9. Figure 9. <!--initial XML Elements--> <?xml version="1.0"?> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="cda.xsl"?> Initial XML Elements Example Document Element The ClinicalDocument is the top-level element in a CDA document. CONF-CF-1: CONF-CF-2: Each CDA file SHALL contain exactly one ClinicalDocument element where the value the value and the value The ClinicalDocument element MAY contain CDA.xsd". Figure 10. ClinicalDocument Element Example <!--required CDA header element--> <ClinicalDocument xmlns="urn:hl7-org:v3" xmlns:voc="urn:hl7-org:v3/voc" xmlns:xsi=" xsi:schemalocation="urn:hl7-org:v3 CDA.xsd"> </ClinicalDocument> AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 22 of 45

23 4.2 Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report CDA Header Constraints The data elements are collected within the CDA file. Some of the data elements are collected within the CDA header elements while others are collected within sections in the CDA body. The data elements included within the header shall not be included again within the CDA body. This section describes the constraints that apply to the CDA header. Header constraints are expressed in relation to the ClinicalDocument element. The header constraints are generic, which are applicable to all Community Pharmacy Patient Safety reports Header Elements The constraints on the CDA elements to be included within the header of a report are provided in this section. There are 44 unique Data Elements in Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report. Among them, there are five administrative data elements and one patient information data element whose value shall be provided in the CDA XML header: DE1 Provider ID DE2 Event ID DE3 Report Type DE4 PSO ID DE30 Report Date DE1106 Patient Sex ClinicalDocument/typeId CDA requires that a ClinicalDocument/typeId be present to identify the constraints imposed by CDA Release 2.0, essentially acting as a CDA version identifier. CONF-CF-3: CONF-CF-4: A report SHALL contain exactly one ClinicalDocument/typeId. The value of typeid/@root SHALL be " " and the value of typeid/@extension SHALL be POCD_HD Figure 11. ClinicalDocument/typeId Example <!--required CDA header element--> <typeid root=" " extension="pocd_hd000040"/> ClinicalDocument/templateId The ClinicalDocument shall have exactly two templateid elements: One templateid shall represent conformance to the generic constraints, and the other templateid shall represent conformance to one of the three report type-specific constraints. The template names for the report types and the associated template OIDs are provided in Table 7. By requiring conformance to both the generic and the report type-specific constraints, each CDA file shall be required to adhere to all the generic and report type-specific constraints specified in this specification. AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 23 of 45

24 CONF-CF-5: CONF-CF-6: CONF-CF-7: A report SHALL contain exactly two ClinicalDocument/templateId elements. The value of one ClinicalDocument/templateId/@root SHALL be representing conformance to the AHRQ Common Formats Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report Version 1.0 generic constraints. The value of the other ClinicalDocument/templateId/@root SHALL be an OID selected from the Document-Level Templates. Table 7 represents conformance to one of the three Common Formats Report Types. Table 7. Document-Level Templates for Community Pharmacy Report Type Template Name for Report Types Template OID Incident Report Near Miss Report Unsafe Condition Report Figure 12. ClinicalDocument/templateId Example <!--template id indicating conformance to AHRQ Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Report Version 1.0 generic constraints--> <templateid root=" "/> <!--template id indicating conformance to an Incident Report-specific constraints--> <templateid root=" "/> ClinicalDocument/id The ClinicalDocument/id represents the unique instance identifier (UID) of a clinical document. The id element uniquely and universally distinguishes a document from all other documents. The id element contains a root and an extension attribute. The PSO is responsible for generating the necessary values and for ensuring uniqueness. If a Common Formats CDA file is submitted with a ClinicalDocument/id that has been previously submitted, the report shall be rejected, including any resubmissions. CONF-CF-8: A report SHALL contain exactly one ClinicalDocument/id. CONF-CF-9: The value of id/@root SHALL be the Community Pharmacy OID with the.1 branch for document s ID. (Refer to Section 3.2, Use of Object Identifiers, for more information about the specifications for the Community Pharmacy OID). CONF-CF-10: The value of id/@extension SHALL be an alphanumeric case insensitive value up to 16 characters in length for each CDA document within the PSO. (Note: The combination shall be unique.) Figure 13. ClinicalDocument/id Example <! The Community Pharmacy OID here is and the root is a.1 branch--> <id root=" " extension="1001"/> AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 24 of 45

25 ClinicalDocument/code This is a required element within the CDA file. The ClinicalDocument/code shall represent the Report type data element (Data Element ID: DE3) for the report. CONF-CF-11: A report SHALL contain exactly one ClinicalDocument/code where the value SHALL be selected from the Common Formats Report Types Table 7 (CodeSystem AHRQ Common Formats) STATIC. Report Type Patient Safety Incident Report Patient Safety Near Miss Report Patient Safety Concern: Unsafe Condition Report Table 8. Answer Code A3 A6 A9 Community Pharmacy Report Types Answer Value Code System Code System Name Incident: A patient safety event that reached the patient, whether or not the patient was harmed. Near Miss: A patient safety event that did not reach the patient. Unsafe condition: any circumstance that increases the probability of a patient safety event AHRQ Common Formats AHRQ Common Formats AHRQ Common Formats Figure 14. ClinicalDocument/code Example <!--example of a ClinicalDocument/code indicating a Patient Safety Incident Report--> <code code="a3" displayname="incident: A patient safety event that reached the patient, whether or not the patient was harmed." codesystem=" " codesystemname="ahrq Common Formats"/> ClinicalDocument/title This optional element provides the title for the type of report being submitted. CONF-CF-12: A report MAY contain exactly one ClinicalDocument/title element valued with a case-insensitive, text string corresponding to a report type from Table 7 (Community Pharmacy Report Types). Figure 15. ClinicalDocument/title Example <!--example of a ClinicalDocument/title indicating a Patient Safety Incident Report--> <title>patient Safety Incident Report</title> AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 25 of 45

26 ClinicalDocument/effectiveTime The ClinicalDocument/effectiveTime element shall represent the Report Date data element (Data Element ID: DE1103) for the report. CONF-CF-13: CONF-CF-14: CONF-CF-15: A report SHALL contain exactly one ClinicalDocument/effectiveTime. The value of effectivetime/@value SHALL be at least precise to the day (YYYYMMDD). If the Report Date is unknown, the value for effectivetime/@nullflavor SHALL be "UNK" (Unknown). Figure 16. effectivetime Example <!--example of ClinicalDocument/effectiveTime indicating the Initial report date--> <effectivetime value=" "/> Figure 17. effectivetime Unknown Example <!--example of ClinicalDocument/effectiveTime indicating the Report Date--> <effectivetime nullflavor="unk"/> ClinicalDocument/confidentialityCode Confidentiality is a required contextual component of a CDA document, where the value expressed in the header holds true for the entire document. For all reports, "Normal" confidentiality shall be used. (Normal confidentiality means only authorized individuals with medical or business need may access this clinical document.) CONF-CF-16: CONF-CF-17: A report SHALL contain exactly one ClinicalDocument/confidentialityCode. The value for confidentialitycode/@code SHALL be "N" Normal (CodeSystem HL7Confidentiality) STATIC. Figure 18. confidentialitycode Example <!--example of ClinicalDocument/confidentialityCode--> <confidentialitycode code="n" codesystem=" "/> AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 26 of 45

27 ClinicalDocument/setId The setid represents the Event identifier (Data Element ID: DE2) and is a required element of this specification. In combination with the author and the versionnumber element, the setid is used to identify updates to previously submitted reports. The setid shall remain common across all document revisions. CONF-CF-18: CONF-CF-19: CONF-CF-20: CONF-CF-21: A report SHALL contain exactly one ClinicalDocument/setId. The value of setid/@root SHALL be the Community Pharmacy OID with the.13 branch. (Refer to the "Section 3.2 Use of Object Identifiers" for more information about the specifications for the Community Pharmacy OID). The value of setid/@extension SHALL be the event identifier. The event identifier shall be up to 16 characters in length excluding XML control characters (< > &). The value of setid/@root, setid/@extension and author SHALL remain the same as that of the previously submitted report in order to update a previously submitted report. Figure 19. setid Example <!--root is the.13 branch of the Community Pharmacy OID ( )--> <!--extension shall be the event identifier within each provider (author) which shall be constant across all revisions of this report--> <setid root=" " extension="12345"/> ClinicalDocument/versionNumber The versionnumber element represents the version number of a report identified by the setid and author elements. The versionnumber element stores the version number of the document as an integer (the first version is 1; the second is 2, etc.). Each document is a member of a set of documents as determined by the value of the setid and author with the versionnumber indicating where in a series of documents a particular instance is located. The versionnumber is used for updates to a previously submitted report, as explained in section Succession Management. Hence, versionnumber is a required element in this specification. CONF-CF-22: CONF-CF-23: A report SHALL contain exactly one ClinicalDocument/versionNumber. The value of versionnumber/@value SHALL be an integer. Figure 20. versionnumber Example <!--example for ClinicalDocument/versionNumber element --> <versionnumber value="1"/> Header Participants This section describes the Participants (Patient, Provider and the PSO) in the report header. The recordtarget/patientrole/patient/administrativegendercode shall represent the Patient Sex data element (Data Element ID: DE1106 (Patient Sex)) for a report. AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Implementation Guide December 2016 Page 27 of 45

Alternate Data Submission Users Guide

Alternate Data Submission Users Guide Alternate Data Submission Users Guide AHRQ Common Formats for Event Reporting Community Pharmacy Version 1.0 Change Log Version Author Date Revision 1.0 PSOPPC 12/2016 Initial Version 1.1 PSOPPC 04/2018

More information

AHRQ PSO Information Form. Technical Specifications for XML. Data Submission from PSO to PSOPPC

AHRQ PSO Information Form. Technical Specifications for XML. Data Submission from PSO to PSOPPC AHRQ PSO Information Form Technical Specifications for XML Data Submission from PSO to PSOPPC December 2013 Revision History Revision Date Notes 11/2011 Initial release of this specification. 12/2012 2012

More information

Workshop 2. > Interoperability <

Workshop 2. > Interoperability < Workshop 2 21 / 08 / 2011 > Interoperability < Heiko Zimmermann R&D Engineer, AHI CR Santec Heiko.Zimmermann@tudor.lu Interoperability definition Picture from NCI-Wiki (https://wiki.nci.nih.gov) 2 Interoperability

More information

CMS QRDA Submission Errors Eligible Hospitals / Critical Access Hospitals

CMS QRDA Submission Errors Eligible Hospitals / Critical Access Hospitals CMS QRDA Submission Errors Eligible Hospitals / Critical Access Hospitals November 5, 2014 Rick Geimer Lantana Consulting Group 1 Presenter Biography Rick Geimer Chief Technology Officer, Lantana Consulting

More information

CDA and CCD for Patient Summaries

CDA and CCD for Patient Summaries CDA and CCD for Patient Summaries Bob Dolin, MD, FACP, FACMI, FHL7 Chair, Health Level Seven President and CMO, What is the CDA? The CDA is a document markup standard for the structure and semantics of

More information

QRDA Category I Conformance Statement Resource CY 2016 ecqm Reporting

QRDA Category I Conformance Statement Resource CY 2016 ecqm Reporting QRDA Category I Conformance Statement Resource CY 2016 ecqm Reporting Updated February 2017 Release Notes November 2016 Initial posting of this resource February 2017 Updated posting of this resource NOTE:

More information

SPECIFICATION OF THE GENERAL CDA DOCUMENT HEADER

SPECIFICATION OF THE GENERAL CDA DOCUMENT HEADER SPECIFICATION OF THE GENERAL CDA DOCUMENT HEADER State: For public comment Diffusion: public Version: 0.8 Date: 24.10.2013 Reference: CDA_General_Header_Specification_v0.8r.pdf HISTORY Version Date Author

More information

QRDA Category I Conformance Statement Resource CY 2016 ecqm Reporting. Next Page

QRDA Category I Conformance Statement Resource CY 2016 ecqm Reporting. Next Page QRDA Category I Conformance Statement Resource CY 2016 ecqm Reporting Next Page QRDA Category I Conformance Statement Resource Overview As of Calendar Year 2016, Quality Reporting Document Architecture

More information

SPECIFICATION OF THE GENERAL CDA DOCUMENT HEADER

SPECIFICATION OF THE GENERAL CDA DOCUMENT HEADER SPECIFICATION OF THE GENERAL CDA DOCUMENT HEADER State: Pre-Final Diffusion: Public Version: 0.98 Date: 06.03.2014 Reference: CDA_General_Header_Specification_v0.98r.pdf HISTORY Version Date Author Description

More information

Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) Data Submission Users Manual. July 2017, Version 1.6

Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) Data Submission Users Manual. July 2017, Version 1.6 Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) Data Submission Users Manual July 2017, Version 1.6 DOCUMENT CHANGE HISTORY Version Number Date Page(s) Affected 1.0 June 2012 Initial version 1.1 March 2013 Formatting

More information

SPECIFICATION OF THE GENERAL CDA DOCUMENT HEADER

SPECIFICATION OF THE GENERAL CDA DOCUMENT HEADER SPECIFICATION OF THE GENERAL CDA DOCUMENT HEADER General Information State Final Version 1.0 Classification Public Responsible HZI Distribution White Reference CDA_General_Header_Specification_v1.0r.pdf

More information

Smart Open Services for European Patients. Work Package Semantic Services

Smart Open Services for European Patients. Work Package Semantic Services 24Am 5 Smart Open Services for European Patients Open ehealth initiative for a European large scale pilot of Patient Summary and Electronic Prescription 10 Work Package 3.5 - Semantic Services Appendix

More information

IHE Pharmacy Technical Framework Supplement. Community Medication List (PML) Rev. 1.3 Trial Implementation

IHE Pharmacy Technical Framework Supplement. Community Medication List (PML) Rev. 1.3 Trial Implementation Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Pharmacy Technical Framework Supplement 10 Community Medication List (PML) 15 Rev. 1.3 Trial Implementation 20 Date: October 11, 2017 Author: IHE Pharmacy Technical

More information

L32 Reference Document

L32 Reference Document D O C U M E N T N U M B E R M T R 0 9 0 3 4 0 M I T R E T E C H N I C A L R E P O RT L32 Reference Document Lightweight C32 Implementation Kacey Oreal Shauni Deshmukh September 2009 The MITRE Corporation

More information

CDX Conformance Profile EMR System Conformance CDA Level 1

CDX Conformance Profile EMR System Conformance CDA Level 1 CDX Conformance Profile - 001 EMR System Conformance CDA Level 1 20-Dec-2017 Version 3.3 Status: Final CDA Level 1 Conformance Profile 001 Page 1 of 33 Version Control Release Date Version Status / Comments

More information

Most Common ecqm Submission Errors for Hospital QRDA Category-I Files

Most Common ecqm Submission Errors for Hospital QRDA Category-I Files Most Common ecqm Submission Errors for Hospital QRDA Category-I Files Jennifer Seeman Edaptive September 30, 2014 Objectives To provide education about electronically specified Clinical Quality Measures

More information

APSR 2.0 Public Comment

APSR 2.0 Public Comment APSR 2.0 Public Comment Remarks 1 Comments on IHE platform Vol. 1, section 10.3: In table 10.3_1 the heading of the 1st column is referring to XD-LAB actor Change this heading to " APSR Actor Vol. 3, section

More information

Transformation Manager

Transformation Manager Transformation Manager (Description of component functionality) Last modification date: 12.7.2013 Version: 0.7 Change History Date Version Status Author Details 25.02.2013 0.1 draft Milada Kovárová Revision

More information

HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2.0 CDA Header. (DK CDA Header) Draft for Trial Use. Release 1.1

HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2.0 CDA Header. (DK CDA Header) Draft for Trial Use. Release 1.1 HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2.0 CDA Header (DK CDA Header) Draft for Trial Use Release 1.1 November 15 th 2017 Revision History Release Author Date Notes 1.0 MedCom 19.05.2015 DK CDA Header

More information

IHE Technical Frameworks General Introduction

IHE Technical Frameworks General Introduction Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise IHE Technical Frameworks General Introduction Appendix E: Standards Profiling and Documentation Conventions Revision 0.1 Draft for Public Comment September 24, 2012

More information

Minnesota Health Care Claims Reporting System Data Element Recommendations Prepared by the Maine Health Information Center Data Submission Process

Minnesota Health Care Claims Reporting System Data Element Recommendations Prepared by the Maine Health Information Center Data Submission Process Three data types will be submitted to MHIC s NCDMS data aggregation system: Eligibility one record for each covered member during the eligibility month Medical claims one record for each paid claim service

More information

CAQH CORE Webinar Series: Use & Adoption of Attachments in Healthcare Administration, Part IV

CAQH CORE Webinar Series: Use & Adoption of Attachments in Healthcare Administration, Part IV CAQH CORE Webinar Series: Use & Adoption of Attachments in Healthcare Administration, Part IV Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) Basics -- Clinical Content (CDA Body) Thursday, January 18, 2018 2:00

More information

Dansk profil for HL7 PHMR Data, datatyper og koder

Dansk profil for HL7 PHMR Data, datatyper og koder Dansk profil for HL7 PHMR Data, datatyper og koder Morten Bruun-Rasmussen mbr@mediq.dk 12. december 2013 HL7 v3. data types Basic data types Codes ANY CD Concepts Descriptor Booleans CE Coded with Equivalents

More information

Workflow and Challenges

Workflow and Challenges Interactive Discussion Between Providers and Payers on Proposed Changes to Attachments Workflow and Challenges Erik Pupo, Deloitte Objectives of this session What are some common implementation challenges

More information

IHE Patient Care Coordination Technical Framework Supplement. Multiple Content Views (MCV) Rev Trial Implementation

IHE Patient Care Coordination Technical Framework Supplement. Multiple Content Views (MCV) Rev Trial Implementation Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Patient Care Coordination Technical Framework Supplement 10 Multiple Content Views 15 Rev. 1.2 - Trial Implementation 20 Date: November 2, 2018 Author: PCC Technical

More information

ERROR MESSAGES TROUBLESHOOTING... 2 OASIS SUBMISSION ERROR MESSAGES... 3 OASIS FILE PROCESSING ERROR MESSAGES... 3

ERROR MESSAGES TROUBLESHOOTING... 2 OASIS SUBMISSION ERROR MESSAGES... 3 OASIS FILE PROCESSING ERROR MESSAGES... 3 5 ERROR MESSAGES TROUBLESHOOTING... 2 OASIS SUBMISSION ERROR MESSAGES... 3 OASIS FILE PROCESSING ERROR MESSAGES... 3 12/2018 v1.07 Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) MESSAGES 5-1 Submission

More information

IHE Radiation Oncology Technical Framework Supplement. Treatment Delivery Record Content (TDRC) Revision 1.0 Draft for Public Comment

IHE Radiation Oncology Technical Framework Supplement. Treatment Delivery Record Content (TDRC) Revision 1.0 Draft for Public Comment Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Radiation Oncology Technical Framework Supplement 10 Treatment Delivery Record Content (TDRC) 15 Revision 1.0 Draft for Public Comment 20 Date: November 15,

More information

CMS QRDA Implementation Guide Changes for CY 2017 Hospital Quality Reporting

CMS QRDA Implementation Guide Changes for CY 2017 Hospital Quality Reporting CMS QRDA Implementation Guide Changes for CY 2017 Hospital Quality Reporting Yan Heras, PhD Principal Informaticist, Enterprise Science and Computing (ESAC), Inc. Artrina Sturges, EdD Project Lead, Inpatient

More information

CEF ehealth DSI 2018 Technical Boot Camp CDA Template Management

CEF ehealth DSI 2018 Technical Boot Camp CDA Template Management CEF ehealth DSI 2018 Technical Boot Camp CDA Template Management 2018-04-25 to 26, Brussels ART-DECOR Challenge "Adherence to Standards ensures interoperability between different medical information systems"

More information

IHE Patient Care Coordination Technical Framework Supplement. Multiple Content Views (MCV) Trial Implementation

IHE Patient Care Coordination Technical Framework Supplement. Multiple Content Views (MCV) Trial Implementation Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Patient Care Coordination Technical Framework Supplement 10 Multiple Content Views 15 Trial Implementation 20 Date: August 28, 2014 Author: PCC Technical Committee

More information

US Food and Drug Administration. Revision History

US Food and Drug Administration. Revision History Specifications for ectd Validation Criteria US Food and Drug Administration Specifications for ectd Validation Criteria Revision History Date Description Version 2008-03-10 Initial Release of ectd Validation

More information

IHE Cardiology Technical Framework Supplement. Registry Content Submission CathPCI V4.4 (RCS-C) Trial Implementation

IHE Cardiology Technical Framework Supplement. Registry Content Submission CathPCI V4.4 (RCS-C) Trial Implementation Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Cardiology Technical Framework Supplement 10 Registry Content Submission CathPCI V4.4 (RCS-C) 15 Trial Implementation 20 Date: July 18, 2014 Author: IHE Cardiology

More information

Health Information Exchange Content Model Architecture Building Block HISO

Health Information Exchange Content Model Architecture Building Block HISO Health Information Exchange Content Model Architecture Building Block HISO 10040.2 To be used in conjunction with HISO 10040.0 Health Information Exchange Overview and Glossary HISO 10040.1 Health Information

More information

Guidance for Creation of an NHS 111 Repeat Caller Query

Guidance for Creation of an NHS 111 Repeat Caller Query Document filename: Document1 Directorate / Programme NHS111 Project NHS111 Document Reference Project Manager Tony Yates Status Final Owner Tony Yates Version 1.0 Author David Barnet Version issue date

More information

Implementation Guide. Consolidated Clinical Documentation Architecture (C-CDA) Documents for Clinical Data Repository (CDR)

Implementation Guide. Consolidated Clinical Documentation Architecture (C-CDA) Documents for Clinical Data Repository (CDR) Implementation Guide Consolidated Clinical Documentation Architecture (C-CDA) Documents for Clinical Data Repository (CDR) Revised: November 2017 Version 2.2 Table of Contents 1. DOCUMENT CHANGE HISTORY...

More information

CAQH CORE Attachments Webinar Series Part 3

CAQH CORE Attachments Webinar Series Part 3 CAQH CORE Attachments Webinar Series Part 3 Clinical Document Metadata Thursday, November 2, 2017 2:00 3:30 pm ET 2017 CAQH, All Rights Reserved. Logistics Presentation Slides & How to Participate in Today

More information

ALBERTA ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION(AEFI) HL7 MESSAGING SPECIFICATION

ALBERTA ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION(AEFI) HL7 MESSAGING SPECIFICATION Health Information Messaging Specification HEALTH INFORMATION STANDARDS COMMITTEE FOR ALBERTA ALBERTA ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION(AEFI) HL7 MESSAGING SPECIFICATION MESSAGE STANDARD SUMMARY Status:

More information

DICOM CONFORMANCE STATEMENT

DICOM CONFORMANCE STATEMENT g GE Medical Systems Technical Publications Direction 5146235-100 Revision 3 Reporting Tool DICOM Copyright 2005-2006 by General Electric Co. Do not duplicate THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK i REVISION

More information

DICOM Conformance Statement for GALILEI. Software Version V6.0

DICOM Conformance Statement for GALILEI. Software Version V6.0 DICOM Conformance Statement for GALILEI Software Version V6.0 Version 1.0, December 6 th, 2011 Contents Revision History... 2 Purpose... 2 References... 2 Terms and Definitions... 2 Abbreviations... 3

More information

ICD-10 Customer Testing Guidelines and Scenarios

ICD-10 Customer Testing Guidelines and Scenarios ICD-10 Customer Testing Guidelines and Scenarios Revision 2.0 Updated July 21, 2015 This document includes pre-release information and user interface designs that are in development for upcoming enhancements

More information

Revision of Technical Conformance Guide on Electronic Study Data Submissions

Revision of Technical Conformance Guide on Electronic Study Data Submissions Notification No. 0824001 August 24, 2016 To: Prefectural Health Department (Bureau) Director of the Advanced Review with Electronic Data Promotion Group, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Revision

More information

Food and Drug Administration

Food and Drug Administration Food and Drug Administration US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Veterinary Medicine Electronic Submission of Animal Adverse Events HL7 Individual Case Safety

More information

Companion Guide Institutional Billing 837I

Companion Guide Institutional Billing 837I Companion Guide Institutional Billing 837I Release 3 X12N 837 (Version 5010A2) Healthcare Claims Submission Implementation Guide Published December 2016 Revision History Date Release Appendix name/ loop

More information

Technical Publications

Technical Publications g GE Healthcare Technical Publications 2391078-2-800 Revision 1 Seno Advantage2 WorkStation for DICOM V3.0 do not duplicate Copyright 2006 By General Electric Co. THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK REVISION

More information

Technical Publications

Technical Publications GE Medical Systems Technical Publications Direction 2188003-100 Revision 0 Tissue Volume Analysis DICOM for DICOM V3.0 Copyright 1997 By General Electric Co. Do not duplicate REVISION HISTORY REV DATE

More information

Maine Department of Health and Human Services

Maine Department of Health and Human Services Maine Department of Health and Human Services Minimum Data Set (MDS) Residential Care Assessment (RCA) Electronic Data Submission Requirements (Version 120103) Prepared For: Office of MaineCare Services

More information

AMERICAN BOARD OF UROLOGY 2017 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF ELECTRONIC LOGS

AMERICAN BOARD OF UROLOGY 2017 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF ELECTRONIC LOGS AMERICAN BOARD OF UROLOGY 2017 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF ELECTRONIC LOGS Please read all instructions carefully before preparing your log. It is imperative that you carefully review the data contained

More information

PS3.20. DICOM PS a - Imaging Reports using HL7 Clinical Document Architecture

PS3.20. DICOM PS a - Imaging Reports using HL7 Clinical Document Architecture PS3.20 DICOM PS3.20 2018a - Imaging Reports using HL7 Clinical Document Architecture Page 2 PS3.20: DICOM PS3.20 2018a - Imaging Reports using HL7 Clinical Document Architecture Copyright 2018 NEMA DICOM

More information

Implementation Guide Consolidated Clinical Documentation Architecture (C-CDA) Documents for Clinical Data Repository (CDR)

Implementation Guide Consolidated Clinical Documentation Architecture (C-CDA) Documents for Clinical Data Repository (CDR) Implementation Guide Consolidated Clinical Documentation Architecture (C-CDA) Documents for Clinical Data Repository (CDR) Revised: October, 2016 Version 1.7 Table of Contents 1. DOCUMENT CHANGE HISTORY...

More information

Punctual Dicom Workstation

Punctual Dicom Workstation DICOM Conformance Statement Punctual Dicom Workstation Company Name Product Name Product Version 2.0 Document number 2008-1001 Date June 1, 2009 Punctual Software Inc. Punctual Dicom Workstation TABLE

More information

IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement. CDA Document Summary Section (CDA-DSS) Revision 1.0 Draft for Public Comment

IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement. CDA Document Summary Section (CDA-DSS) Revision 1.0 Draft for Public Comment Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement 10 CDA Document Summary Section (CDA-DSS) 15 Revision 1.0 Draft for Public Comment 20 Date: May

More information

IPS TCON Minute in red Notes from the previous calls in green

IPS TCON Minute in red Notes from the previous calls in green IPS TCON 2017-04-12 Minute in red Notes from the previous calls in green Agenda Madrid Meeting Header Medical Devices History of Past Illness Section EDQM Mapping (medication) High Level plan (time allowing)

More information

Electronic Health Information Standard based on CDA for Thai Medical System: focused on Medical Procedures in Medium-sized Hospitals (HOSxP)

Electronic Health Information Standard based on CDA for Thai Medical System: focused on Medical Procedures in Medium-sized Hospitals (HOSxP) 2015 12 th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) Electronic Health Information Standard based on CDA for Thai Medical System: focused on Medical Procedures

More information

Existing Healthcare Standards

Existing Healthcare Standards Existing Healthcare Standards Category Context (Information Model) Information Interchange Standard & Specific Elements ASN.1 Abstract Syntax Notation.1 ASTM E2369-05 Standard Specification for Continuity

More information

Session 2 ISO ICSR Implementation Technical Aspects - Part 1

Session 2 ISO ICSR Implementation Technical Aspects - Part 1 Session 2 ISO ICSR Implementation Technical Aspects - Part 1 Presented by: Nick Halsey Data Standardisation and Analytics An agency of the European Union Do I really need to understand the ISO/HL7 messaging

More information

Appendix A Vendor Specifications for. State of Idaho MMIS

Appendix A Vendor Specifications for. State of Idaho MMIS Appendix A Vendor Specifications-5010 for State of Idaho MMIS Date of Publication: 1/18/2017 Document Number: TL428 Version: 6.0 Revision History Version Date Author Action/Summary of Changes 1.0 07/01/2011

More information

PBJ 1.0 Data Submission Specifications Overview. Table of Contents

PBJ 1.0 Data Submission Specifications Overview. Table of Contents PBJ 1.0 Data Submission Specifications Overview Version 1.00 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 2 2 Version History... 2 3 Version Implementation... 2 4 Components of the PBJ Specifications... 3 5 Data

More information

IHE Endoscopy Technical Framework Supplement. Endoscopy Image Archiving (EIA) Rev. 1.1 Trial Implementation

IHE Endoscopy Technical Framework Supplement. Endoscopy Image Archiving (EIA) Rev. 1.1 Trial Implementation Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Endoscopy Technical Framework Supplement 10 Endoscopy Image Archiving (EIA) 15 Rev. 1.1 Trial Implementation 20 Date: November 28, 2018 Author: IHE Endoscopy

More information

HITSP/C32. December 13, 2007 Version 2.1. Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel. Consumer Empowerment Technical Committee.

HITSP/C32. December 13, 2007 Version 2.1. Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel. Consumer Empowerment Technical Committee. December 13, 2007 Version 2.1 HITSP Summary Documents Using HL7 Continuity of Care Document (CCD) Component HITSP/C32 Submitted to: Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Submitted by: Consumer

More information

Sharing Value Sets (SVS Profile) Ana Estelrich

Sharing Value Sets (SVS Profile) Ana Estelrich Sharing Value Sets (SVS Profile) Ana Estelrich GIP-DMP Overall presentation of the profile The Sharing Value Sets (SVS) profile provides a way through which healthcare systems producing clinical or administrative

More information

FedRAMP Initial Review Standard Operating Procedure. Version 1.3

FedRAMP Initial Review Standard Operating Procedure. Version 1.3 FedRAMP Initial Review Standard Operating Procedure Version 1.3 August 27, 2015 Revision History Date Version Page(s) Description Author 08/07/2015 1.0 All Initial Release FedRAMP PMO 08/17/2015 1.1 All

More information

HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Questionnaire Response Document, Release 1

HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Questionnaire Response Document, Release 1 CDAR2_IG_QRDOC_DSTU_R1_2014JAN HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Questionnaire Response Document, Release 1 Draft Standard for Trial Use January 2014 Sponsored by: Structured Documents Work Group

More information

HL7 Clinical Document Architecture Ambassador Briefing

HL7 Clinical Document Architecture Ambassador Briefing HL7 Clinical Document Architecture Ambassador Briefing May 2010 - IHIC Diego Kaminker HL7 Argentina KERN-IT SRL www.kern-it.com.ar 1 Tension of Documentation Extensible Markup Language (XML) Two extremes

More information

Maternal mhealth. Solution / Product and Technology Framework. Authors

Maternal mhealth. Solution / Product and Technology Framework. Authors Maternal mhealth Solution / Product and Technology Framework VERSION 1.1, August 2014 Authors Chris Seebregts and Hannes Venter, Jembi Health Systems NPC Contributors Rhonwyn Cornell and Linda Taylor,

More information

The Surplus Line Association of Oregon Oregon Surplus Line Automation Suite Bulk Data Submission Guide

The Surplus Line Association of Oregon Oregon Surplus Line Automation Suite Bulk Data Submission Guide The Surplus Line Association of Oregon Oregon Surplus Line Automation Suite Bulk Data Submission Guide 1901 Commonwealth Ln Tallahassee, FL 32303 Phone: 850.383.1011 Fax: 850.383-1015 www.infinity-software.com

More information

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Published September 2017 Copyright 2017 Health and Social Care Information Centre. The Health and Social Care Information Centre is a non-departmental body created

More information

efx Software DICONDE Conformance Statement

efx Software DICONDE Conformance Statement efx Software DICONDE Conformance Statement Version 1.2 9/29/2015 North Star Imaging, Inc. 1 DICOM conformance statement overview The North Star Imaging s efx Software is an imaging viewing software with

More information

2017 MOC PEDIATRIC PRACTICE LOG TEMPLATE:

2017 MOC PEDIATRIC PRACTICE LOG TEMPLATE: AMERICAN BOARD OF UROLOGY 2017 MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION (MOC) Level 4 PEDIATRIC UROLOGY SUBSPECIALTY CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION PROCESS INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF ELECTRONIC LOGS Please read all

More information

HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA, Release 2 Clinical Oncology Treatment Plan and Summary May HL7 Draft Standard for Trial Use (DSTU) Ballot

HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA, Release 2 Clinical Oncology Treatment Plan and Summary May HL7 Draft Standard for Trial Use (DSTU) Ballot CDAR2_IG_CLONDATA_2013MAY HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA, Release 2 Clinical Oncology Treatment Plan and Summary May 2013 HL7 Draft Standard for Trial Use (DSTU) Ballot Sponsored by: Structured Documents

More information

A SAMPLE PAPER SHOWING THE FORMAT REQUIRED FOR YOUR CONTRIBUTION TO THE SAGEEP 2015 PROCEEDINGS. Abstract. Submission Procedure

A SAMPLE PAPER SHOWING THE FORMAT REQUIRED FOR YOUR CONTRIBUTION TO THE SAGEEP 2015 PROCEEDINGS. Abstract. Submission Procedure A SAMPLE PAPER SHOWING THE FORMAT REQUIRED FOR YOUR CONTRIBUTION TO THE SAGEEP 2015 PROCEEDINGS EEGS Annual Meeting Austin, TX USA March 22-26, 2015 Abstract Thank you for your participation in SAGEEP

More information

SNOMED Clinical Terms

SNOMED Clinical Terms Representing clinical information using SNOMED Clinical Terms with different structural information models KR-MED 2008 - Phoenix David Markwell Laura Sato The Clinical Information Consultancy Ltd NHS Connecting

More information

Maryland Health Insurance Exchange (MHBE) Standard Companion Guide Transaction Information

Maryland Health Insurance Exchange (MHBE) Standard Companion Guide Transaction Information A service of the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange Maryland Health Insurance Exchange (MHBE) Standard Companion Guide Transaction Information 999 Implementation Acknowledgments for Health Care Insurance

More information

Technical Publications

Technical Publications Technical Publications Direction 2027332-481 Revision 2 Mac-Lab/CardioLab 6.8 Copyright ª 2009 by General Electric Co. Do not duplicate GE Healthcare REVISION HISTORY REV DATE REASON FOR CHANGE 1 April

More information

C-DAC s Medical Informatics Software Development Kit (SDK) for DICOM PS Conformance Statement

C-DAC s Medical Informatics Software Development Kit (SDK) for DICOM PS Conformance Statement C-DAC s Medical Informatics Software Development Kit (SDK) for DICOM PS 3.0-2015 Conformance Statement Company Name: Centre of Development for Advanced Computing Product Name: C-DAC s Medical Informatics

More information

Biotechnology Industry Organization 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006

Biotechnology Industry Organization 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006 Biotechnology Industry Organization 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006 December 22, 2003 Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane Room 1061 Rockville,

More information

IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework Supplement. Non-patient File Sharing (NPFSm) Rev. 1.1 Trial Implementation

IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework Supplement. Non-patient File Sharing (NPFSm) Rev. 1.1 Trial Implementation Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework Supplement 10 Non-patient File Sharing (NPFSm) HL7 FHIR STU 3 15 Using Resources at FMM Level 3-5 Rev. 1.1 Trial Implementation

More information

BPMN Working Draft. 1. Introduction

BPMN Working Draft. 1. Introduction 1. Introduction The Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI) has developed a standard Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN). The primary goal of BPMN is to provide a notation that is readily understandable

More information

PSOPPC Web Service Users Manual. February 2017, Version 1.1

PSOPPC Web Service Users Manual. February 2017, Version 1.1 PSOPPC Web Service Users Manual February 2017, Version 1.1 DOCUMENT CHANGE HISTORY Version Number Date Page(s) Affected Description 1.0 June 2014 Initial version 1.1 February 2017 Content updates PSOPPC

More information

IHE Radiology Technical Framework Supplement. Draft for Public Comment

IHE Radiology Technical Framework Supplement. Draft for Public Comment Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Radiology Technical Framework Supplement 10 Imaging Clinical Decision Support Workflow (ICDSW) 15 Draft for Public Comment 20 Date: February 19, 2015 Author:

More information

LIFE LONG LEARNING LEVEL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF ELECTRONIC LOGS

LIFE LONG LEARNING LEVEL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF ELECTRONIC LOGS AMERICAN BOARD OF UROLOGY LIFE LONG LEARNING LEVEL 2 2018 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF ELECTRONIC LOGS Please read all instructions carefully before preparing your log. It is imperative that you carefully

More information

ERROR MESSAGES. 03/2017 v1.03 Hospice Item Set (HIS) MESSAGES 5-1 Submission User's Guide for the QIES ASAP System

ERROR MESSAGES. 03/2017 v1.03 Hospice Item Set (HIS) MESSAGES 5-1 Submission User's Guide for the QIES ASAP System 5 ERROR MESSAGES TROUBLESHOOTING... 2 SUBMISSION ERROR MESSAGES FOR HOSPICE ITEM SET DATA... 3 FILE PROCESSING ERROR MESSAGES FOR HOSPICE ITEM SET DATA... 3 03/2017 v1.03 Hospice Item Set (HIS) MESSAGES

More information

LAB INFORMATION SYSTEMS MESSAGE STANDARD SUMMARY

LAB INFORMATION SYSTEMS MESSAGE STANDARD SUMMARY Health Information Messaging Specification HEALTH INFORMATION STANDARDS COMMITTEE FOR ALBERTA LAB INFORMATION SYSTEMS MESSAGE STANDARD SUMMARY HL7 V2.4 LAB TEST RESULT DELIVERY SPECIFICATION AND HL7V3

More information

MiFID II Transaction Reporting. Technical Specification

MiFID II Transaction Reporting. Technical Specification MiFID II Transaction Reporting Technical Specification www.gfsc.gi 11 August 2017 Version Control Date Version Details 11/08/2017 Version 1 1 Technical Specification The purpose of this paper is to outline

More information

Physician Quality Reporting System Program Year Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO) Web Interface XML Specification

Physician Quality Reporting System Program Year Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO) Web Interface XML Specification Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CMS expedited Life Cycle (XLC) Physician Quality Reporting System Program Year 2013 Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO) Web Interface XML Specification Version:

More information

BPMN Working Draft. 1. Introduction

BPMN Working Draft. 1. Introduction 1. Introduction The Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI) has developed a standard Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN). The primary goal of BPMN is to provide a notation that is readily understandable

More information

Organizational Track 1 p.m.-2 p.m. Maintenance and Updating Margo Imel, RHIT, MBA Terminology ManagerMapping, SNOMED, International Pat Wilson, RT

Organizational Track 1 p.m.-2 p.m. Maintenance and Updating Margo Imel, RHIT, MBA Terminology ManagerMapping, SNOMED, International Pat Wilson, RT Organizational Track 1 p.m.-2 p.m. Maintenance and Updating Margo Imel, RHIT, MBA Terminology ManagerMapping, SNOMED, International Pat Wilson, RT (R), CPC, Team Lead Health Data Dictionary 3M SNOMED CT

More information

IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework Supplement. Patient Identifier Cross-reference for Mobile (PIXm) Rev. 1.4 Trial Implementation

IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework Supplement. Patient Identifier Cross-reference for Mobile (PIXm) Rev. 1.4 Trial Implementation Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework Supplement 10 Patient Identifier Cross-reference for Mobile (PIXm) 15 HL7 FHIR STU 3 Using Resources at FMM Level 5 Rev.

More information

Pennsylvania PROMISe Companion Guide

Pennsylvania PROMISe Companion Guide Pennsylvania Companion Guide Unsolicited 277 Claim Response Version 5010 September 2010 Version 1 Pennsylvania PROMISe Unsolicited 277 Claim Companion Guide This page intentionally left blank. September

More information

Vendor Compliance Checklist. Version 1.4

Vendor Compliance Checklist. Version 1.4 Vendor Compliance Checklist Version 1.4 Revision History Date Version Description Author September 22, 2006 1.0 Initial Draft Angela Lawlor September 27, 2006 1.2 Removing duplicates Angela Lawlor October

More information

Florida HIE PLU Best Practices

Florida HIE PLU Best Practices Florida HIE On-boarding Integration Florida HIE PLU Best Practices 1 Slide Use 1 of or 14 disclosure of data contained on this sheet or display screen is HARRIS subject PROPRIETARY to the restriction INFORMATION

More information

Technical Publications

Technical Publications g GE Medical Systems Technical Publications Direction 2275362-100 Revision 0 DICOM for DICOM V3.0 Copyright 2000 By General Electric Co. Do not duplicate REVISION HISTORY REV DATE REASON FOR CHANGE 0 May

More information

2.0. Automated Documents. Standard. STD-2 Issue: 2.0 Issue Date: March 25, Public

2.0. Automated Documents. Standard. STD-2 Issue: 2.0 Issue Date: March 25, Public 2.0 Automated Documents Standard STD-2 Issue: 2.0 Issue Date: March 25, 2015 Public Document Change History Issue Reason for Issue Date 1.0 First issue of IESO Standard. Consolidation of IESO_ISTD_0001,

More information

IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement. CDA Document Summary Sections (CDA-DSS) Revision 1.1 Trial Implementation

IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement. CDA Document Summary Sections (CDA-DSS) Revision 1.1 Trial Implementation Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement 10 CDA Document Summary Sections (CDA-DSS) 15 Revision 1.1 Trial Implementation 20 Date: September

More information

IHE Technical Frameworks General Introduction

IHE Technical Frameworks General Introduction Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Technical Frameworks General Introduction 10 15 20 Revision 1.0 July 1, 2014 25 Please verify you have the most recent version of this document, which is published

More information

Technical Publications

Technical Publications g GE Medical Systems Technical Publications 2391078-800 Revision 1 Seno Advantage WorkStation for DICOM V3.0 do not duplicate Copyright 2003 By General Electric Co. THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK REVISION

More information

26 CP Retire DICOMDIR reference to unencapsulated CDA on media

26 CP Retire DICOMDIR reference to unencapsulated CDA on media 26 CP-765 - Retire DICOMDIR reference to unencapsulated CDA on media Page Status Assigned 2 Date of Last Update 207/2/22 3 Person Assigned David Clunie 4 mailto:dclunie@dclunie.com 5 Submitter Name David

More information

Step: 9 Conduct Data Standardization

Step: 9 Conduct Data Standardization Step: 9 Conduct Data Standardization Version 1.0, February 2005 1 Step Description/Objectives: Step 9, Conduct Data Standardization, is intended to reduce the life cycle cost of data through data integration,

More information

Medical Associates Health Plans and Health Choices

Medical Associates Health Plans and Health Choices Medical Associates Health Plans and Health Choices 270/271 HIPAA Transaction Companion Guide HIPAA V5010X279A1 VERSION: 2.0 DATE: 06/21/2016 1 Disclosure Statement This material contains confidential,

More information

GE Healthcare. Technical Publications. ConnectR Plus Version 5.0 DICOM CONFORMANCE STATEMENT. GE Healthcare IT. Direction DOC Revision 0.

GE Healthcare. Technical Publications. ConnectR Plus Version 5.0 DICOM CONFORMANCE STATEMENT. GE Healthcare IT. Direction DOC Revision 0. GE Healthcare Technical Publications Direction DOC0509300 Revision 0.1 ConnectR Plus Version 5.0 GE Healthcare IT Copyright 2008. General Electric Company 1 Revision History Revision # Author Description

More information

Storage Peak. Version 5.3. HL7 Interface Specification

Storage Peak. Version 5.3. HL7 Interface Specification Storage Peak Version 5.3 HL7 Interface Specification Product: StoragePeak Version 5.1 Version 04.02 Document: HL7 Interface Specification 2013-07-11 Contents 1.INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1Revision History...

More information