SeON GAP analysis. Dr. Parag Pruthi - Chair. Dr. Ashutosh Dutta Vice Chair. Date: December 14, 2010 Copyright 2010 GISFI. All Rights Reserved.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Lora Black
5 years ago
Views:

SeON GAP analysis Dr. Parag Pruthi - Chair NIKSUN Dr.

2 Outline ATIS SON Work-plan Gap Analysis with ATIS Work GISFI Slide 2

3 Synergy with current standards 3GPP ETSI TISPAN ATIS - SON ITU-T OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards) OMA (Open Mobile Alliance) SNIA (Storage Networking Industry Association) TMF (TeleManagement Forum) Open Grid Forum (OGF) OMG NGSON (IEEE P1903) GSM Association Liberty Alliance 3

4 SON Workplan Service Creation, Delivery and Management Service Delivery Agile Service Creation 3 rd Party Interfaces Service Quality Management Data Models, IT Infrastructure Data Models IT Infrastructure Virtualization OSS/BSS Security and Trust Models Policy in the SON Networks Business Models and Processes GISFI Slide 4

5 3GPP Supported by an alliance of the following: ARIB (Association of Radio Industries and Businesses) CCSA (China Communications Standards Association) ETSI (European Telecommunication Standards Association) ATIS TTA 3GPP divided into following main groups GERAN GSM EDGE Radio Access Network RAN Radio Access Networks SA Services & System Aspects CT Core Network & Terminals Common IMS Network 5

6 ETSI - TISPAN Main contributor to IMS via 3GPP In collaboration with ITU-T NGN management Security interfaces Future developments should be SOA compliant Accessible using SOQ/WEB 2.0 3GPP divided into following main groups GERAN GSM EDGE Radio Access Network RAN Radio Access Networks SA Services & System Aspects CT Core Network & Terminals Common IMS Network 6

7 ITU-T Founded on May 17, 1865 Standardization Allocation of radio spectrum Organizing interconnection arrangements between countries ITU-T 13 SGs SG13 - Next Generation Networks SG17 Security, Languages, Telecommunications 7

8 OASIS Drives the development, convergence and adoption of e-business standards Focus of first TC Identify SOA for Telecom gaps Develop Requirements Analysis Across Telecom Spec Identify extensions/adaptations for Telecom systems to fit in a Service Oriented World Development of Language for Web Services WSDL (Web Services Description Language) BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Standardized solution for idm 8

9 OMA (Open Mobile Alliance) Formed in June 2002 Represents world s leading mobile operators, device & network suppliers LIF, MMS-IOP, Wireless Village, MGIF, MWIF Focuses on Identify SOA for Telecom gaps Develop Requirements Analysis Across Telecom Spec Identify extensions/adaptations for Telecom systems to fit in a Service Oriented World Development of Language for Web Services WSDL (Web Services Description Language) BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Standardized solution for idm 9

10 TMF (TeleManagement Forum) TM Forum establish 1988 Represents world s leading mobile operators, device & network suppliers 700 members in 71 countries Primary Focus Delivering OSS solutions for Telco world Define services and solutions in the SOA and Web 2.0 SDF (TR139 v2.0) Service Delivery Framework is an agnostic framework regardless of software or network technologies Industry Groups Positioning (TR141) A document that describes how the SDF complements, leverages and fills the gap Business Agreement (TMF 519) Business objectives, Technical principles, categorized documents 10

11 TMF (TeleManagement Forum) TM Forum establish 1988 Represents world s leading mobile operators, device & network suppliers 700 members in 71 countries Primary Focus Delivering OSS solutions for Telco world Define services and solutions in the SOA and Web 2.0 SDF (TR139 v2.0) Service Delivery Framework is an agnostic framework regardless of software or network technologies Industry Groups Positioning (TR141) A document that describes how the SDF complements, leverages and fills the gap Business Agreement (TMF 519) Business objectives, Technical principles, categorized documents 11

12 W3C W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) develops interoperable technologies and defines Web Services Architecture provides a standard means of operating between different software applications running on a variety of platforms and/or frameworks. Web 2.0 extends Web to address further user generated content, user-to-user collaboration and user to service interaction using web protocols such as REST. Web 3.0 addresses the semantic aspect and service automation Relevant W3C standards Ubiquitous Web Content Authoring and styles Semantic, metadata and description 12

13 OMG OMG Develops enterprise integration standards for a wide range of technologies Modeling standards Unified Modeling Language (UML) Model Driven Architecture (MDA) UML Metamodel and profile for service (UPMS) Advanced and Integrated Telecommunication Services BPEL allow service composition Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Mobile Ontology for Telecommunication Mobile Domain 13

14 P1903 IEEE NGSON NGSON Next Generation Service Overlay Networks Sponsored by IEEE ComSoc and CAG Purpose: Develop a service-based architecture benefit network operators, content providers and end-users to provide and consume collaborative services Deployment of context-aware, dynamically adaptive and self organizing capabilities Scope of the work: NGSON Requirements document NGSON Architecture Standard NGSON Technical Specification Early proof-of-concept available 14

15 SON GAP Analysis with other SDOs Service Delivery Common Service Enabler Description Standardization of inter-domain service handoff Service Enabler Publishing Standardization of SON in transport layer Service Syndication Standardization of end-user service syndication User domain Service Enablers Assessment of user domain standard gaps Service Creation Assessment of Service Creation standards gaps 15

16 SON GAP Analysis Work Items (cont.) Inter-domain User Profile Data Acquisition Standardization of User Profile Data Acquisition (Crossdomain) Service Quality Management Standardization 3 rd Party Interfaces Consistency of 3 rd Party interfaces Parley architecture for attribute sharing and identity management Device Independent Mobile Framework Data Models Common Data Model requirements Common Name Space Requirement IT Infrastructure, Virtualization, Storage Service Oriented Infrastructure Standardization 16

17 SON GAP Analysis Work Items (cont.) OSS/BSS Coordinated exchange of data across organization boundaries Common repository of product data catalogues Common repository of metadata Customer-centric profiles and service sessions Flexible billing and charging systems standards Federated Information Architecture for Ontology Definition of SoA Service contract and SoA protocols Standards Policy Assessment of redundant or divergent standards Common Policy Reference Model, Syntax and Semantics Policy Detection Methods Network detection of Application QoS requirements Policy Interfaces and Mapping 17

18 SON Standards Gap for Telecon Develop required Telecom extensions of WS stack as the enabling technology for SOA. Develop standardized and complete Identity Management solution. Security. Develop required Telecom extensions of models and metamodels for services, business processes, Model Driven and Event Driven Architecture SOA enablement. Develop requirements related to the specific to expose NGN capabilities to be exposed to applications such as (e.g. Service Interfaces from network components and from support functions). 18

19 SON Standards Landscape

20 SON Standards Gaps for Telecoms

21 Different Standardization domains Web clients REST APIs WEB 2.0 User domain IMS Clients SOA Main stream commercial apps User End users Service Applications Re-Use SDKs APIs Service Enablers Many long-tail apps and developers SOAP APIs Resource Few apps and developers IMS Applications Storage and computing Networks Web domain Telco domain IT domain GISFI Source ATIS Slide 21

22 Possible Areas of work Investigate New business models for SON Control and configuration management Context aware and self organizing network Pervasive Network Architecture Telecom Network Virtualization Service Creation Environment Third party service enablers Information migration End-to-end QoS provisioning Seamless mobility End-to-end Security Green Telecom (SoN) Co-existence with legacy applications GISFI Slide 22

23 Integration of WEB 2.0 application in IMS: a Case study S-CSCF Existing (USP) SIP A/S (SIP msg unpacked, re-emitted as HTTP) P-CSCF Internet HTTP message HTTP Response SIP 200 OK SIP:REGISTER SIP:MESSAGE(event data) Google, Yahoo! API s Web Application Server USP Logic (JSP s) HTTP Get Web Browser SIP client SIP message formation tool Event emulation/emission Send(SIP msg) Create SIP msg from XML event User views her web-based portal 23

Engine Mobile user and other applications push and pull context towards the

Context might be GPS coords,, new scheduled events or new directives.

SIP message) Mashup logic continually updates users information layer,

24 Copyright 2008, Telcordia Web 2.0 Applications over IMS Case study Contextual Mashup logic -Tomcat - Event Engine Mobile user and other applications push and pull context towards the Application Server (AS). Context is embedded in SIP messages. Context might be GPS coords,, new scheduled events or new directives. AS Application-Service Layer IMS Layer AS Outbound reminders AS AS Events (in SIP message) Mashup logic continually updates users information layer, providing notifications of calendar, task and other information deadlines. Transport Layer Web 2.0 has been an abrubt and disruptive change to online activity. IMS, converged services, and Web 2.0 style information represent new revenue streams for operators and further differentiates Them from dumb pipe providers. 24

25 Self Organizing Network Self Organization of IMS Goals of Self Organization of IMS Efficient Redundancy Easy Planning of facilities, Easy Configuration How to realize Each Node recognizes required roles automatically ex. P/I/S-CSCF, HSS, AAA, MGCF, PDIF/AGW Each Node changes its roles dynamically as needed Automatically and Dynamically S-CSCF S-CSCF S-CSCF S-CSCF I-CSCF I-CSCF I-CSCF I-CSCF P-CSCF P-CSCF P-CSCF P-CSCF HSS HSS HSS HSS PDIF/AGW PDIF/AGW PDIF/AGW PDIF/AGW MGCF MGCF MGCF MGCF Basic Self-Organizing Node One Node One Node One Node 25 Copyright 2007 Telcordia Technologies. All Rights Reserved.

26 Self-Organizing IMS Scenarios Transition N1 N1 N2 N1 N2 H H H I I I (1) (2) S S S P P P1 P2 Scenario 1 (Add all) Scenario 2 (Move P) Scenario 3 (Add P1) (3) N1 N2 N3 (2 /Duplicate P) N1 N2 N3 H H I I (4) S1 S2 P1 P2 (4 /Delete S1) P1 P2 S (6) Scenario 5 (Add S1) Scenario 4 (Move S) N1 N2 N3 N4 (5) H I TELCORDIA PROPRIETARY - INTERNAL USE ONLY See proprietary restrictions on title page. S1 P1 S2 P2 Scenario 6 (Move I) 26 Copyright 2007 Telcordia

Feedback-based (SON) DNS/E NUM S-CSCF HSS S-CSCF Invite OK ACK P-CSCF RTP diameter GETS- Application Server I-CSCF P-CSCF SIP DNS Performance Monitor PCRF IMS PCRF Layer 3 control Network Feedback

27 Feedback-based (SON) DNS/E NUM S-CSCF HSS S-CSCF Invite OK ACK P-CSCF RTP diameter GETS- Application Server I-CSCF P-CSCF SIP DNS Performance Monitor PCRF IMS PCRF Layer 3 control Network Feedback Multi-layer SON Controller Managed IP (Multi-Provider Network) IMS-layer control Layer 2 control GW GETS Call Wireline Access Cable DSL Fiber Ethernet Caller (UE1) RAN GW IP CAN Wireless Access UMTS EvDO WiMAX LTE Satellite 27 Wireless Access UMTS EvDO WiMAX LTE Satellite RAN RAN IP CAN Called (UE2) Wireline Access Cable DSL Fiber Ethernet 27

SeON Framework A service oriented approach

SeON Framework A service oriented approach Dr. Parag Pruthi - Chair NIKSUN Dr. Ashutosh Dutta Vice Chair NIKSUN Date: December 14, 2010 Copyright 2010 GISFI. All Rights Reserved. Outline Agenda approval