Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Arterial Performance Measures Framework

Similar documents
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Memorandum of Understanding: Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (I-80 ICM) Project

Intelligent Transportation Traffic Data Management

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Regional Integration of Intelligent Transportation Systems (RIITS)

Connected Corridors Face-to-Face Meeting. Tuesday, Dec 6th, :30 3:30 pm Caltrans D7 HQ

STATEWIDE INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION RELIABILITY PROGRAM

LAWRENCE-DOUGLAS COUNTY INTELLIGENT JOURNEY

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

Deployment of ITS Projects in Pasadena A Local Agency Perspective

responsibilities the MOU outlines include each agencies commitment

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 3 REFINED MLT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 2i3.g Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA metro.net

Performance Measurement, Data and Decision Making: A Matter of Alignment. Mark F. Muriello Assistant Director Tunnels, Bridges & Terminals

The Freeway Performance Measurement System (PeMS) (PeMS Version 3)

Upgrading Traffic Signals to Enable a Connected Vehicle Test Bed Somerville, Massachusetts

Item 12. Measure R Implementation and Communication Plan

NJ Transit - Transit Signal Priority Intersection Evaluation Methodology A sketch planning approach to TSP prioritization

Engaging Maryland toward CAV advancements Christine Nizer, Administrator

Arterial data quality and traffic estimation

Data Integration for Integrated Corridor Management

and The Technical Assist Database Presented to the Regional GIS Council October 8, 2008

Connected & Automated Vehicle Activities

Council of State Governments. Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing. October 28, 2013

ITS Canada Annual Conference and General Meeting. May 2013

South Central Pennsylvania Regional Operations Plan Candidate Project Listing (DRAFT)

Verification Plan: Mitchell Hammock Road. Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System. Prepared by: City of Oviedo. Draft 1: June 2015

Attachment 1. PenPlace Transportation and Traffic: Neighboring Communities Concerns, Issues and Proposed Action Plan

City of La Mirada System Architecture Diagram Draft (Deliverable )

Arizona Emergency VII (E-VII) Program Overview and Focus Areas

Outdoor Lighting Accelerator: Challenges & Opportunities Click To Edit Master Title Style

SACOG Board of Directors

APPENDIX D. Traffic Impact Analysis

South Central ROP Projects

Stakeholder Engagement Summary Report

EXTENDING RED/PURPLE LINE REVENUE SERVICE TO EAST SIDE OF DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES/ARTS DISTRICT

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)

Cedar Rapids ITS Deployment Project

METRO SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY Executive Summary May 2009 DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS

AZTech Capability Maturity Model

PORTAL. A Case Study. Dr. Kristin Tufte Mark Wong September 23, Linux Plumbers Conference 2009

Denver s Future. City Club of Denver

Bus Circulator Feasibility Study Scope of Work March 12, 2018

FIBER OPTIC RESOURCE SHARING IN VIRGINIA

Managed Lane owner decision needed San Mateo County s options Understanding revenues & costs Pros & cons of County s options Proposed next steps

Agenda Overview. Process Update Overview of Revised Goals Transportation Trends Small Group Breakout Questions and Comments Next Steps Meeting Close

Enterprise Guest Access

November 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING

Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan

The Maryland Transit Administration. A Plan to Connect Baltimore

-P~~. November 24, The Honorable Thomas V. Mike Miller, JI. Senate President State House, H-107 Annapolis, MD 21401

California Cybersecurity Integration Center (Cal-CSIC)

Local City Control Site Conceptual Design

MARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018

Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO

An Assessment of Congestion in the Kansas City Region using the MARC Travel Demand Model

STATE STREET CORRIDOR

Smart City IoT Solution Brings Data Insight to Transportation

Charting the Progress of Smart City Development in Shanghai

LOS ANGELES COUNTYWIDE INFORMATION EXCHANGE NETWORK SITE INTEGRATION SITE SERVER TEST PROCEDURES

Metrobus 30s Line Enhancements

Major Comments and Responses 2018 Update. Transportation Advisory Board September 19, 2018

Municipal Service Park 3 December Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex

NC Education Cloud Feasibility Report

Climate Change/Extreme Weather Vulnerability Risk Assessment:

ontents Ten Year Strategic Plan Turbo Architecture Output Appendix

SMARTATL. A Smart City Overview and Roadmap. Evanta CIO Executive Summit 1

City of San José 2017 Coyote Creek Flood After-Action Review & Improvement Recommendations Report

SMART REGION STARNET PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND MODERNIZATION STRATEGY DRAFT. December 20, 2018

Executive Summary. City of Goodyear. Prepared for: Prepared by: November, 2008 Copyright 2008, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master title style

The goal of this task is to assemble the input data required to deliver national accessibility reports and

Bay Area Regional Bicycle Share Pilot Project. Karen Schkolnick, BAAQMD SPUR Evening Forum: Bike Sharing Around the Bay June 25, 2013

Accelerate Your Enterprise Private Cloud Initiative

STATEWIDE CENTERLINE INITIATIVE EDITED: MAY 17, 2013

LOCAL STREETS AND THE ARNOLD INITIATIVE

Click to edit Master title style. Utilizing GIS for Shared Public Agency Infrastructure Planning

Traveler Information In Virginia

Data Driven Analysis in Transportation Systems

Feasibility Study Downtown Moorhead Railroad Grade Separation Moorhead, Minnesota July 2008

Understanding the Potential for Video Analytics to Support Traffic Management Functions

Atlantic Blvd. / I-710 Corridor. Deliverable 2.6.1

NOVEMBER department of transportation CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Statewide Computerized Traffic Signal Systems Needs Assessment

The USC 2 T Project The USC Clever Transportation Project

City Hall Space Selection 15 Market Square. November 27, 2017

DIXIE REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Supporting Strategic Customers Needs

System Expansion Implementation Plan. Board Meeting, April 2017

6 July Moving Britain Ahead OFFICIAL. Presentation Title (edit this in Insert > Header and Footer, then click 'Apply to All') 1

Federal Government. Each fiscal year the Federal Government is challenged CATEGORY MANAGEMENT IN THE WHAT IS CATEGORY MANAGEMENT?

TMC of the Future. Matt Lee Associate Vice President

Transportation Systems Management & Operations (TSM&O) Research. Next Generation Innovations & Opportunities

Transportation Data for Chicago Traffic Management Center. Abraham Emmanuel Deputy Commissioner, CDOT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Mobile Application for Public Health Surveillance

Downtown Boise Multimodal Center

Policy Section VI: B 2: Assignment of Clubs to Districts, Divisions, and Areas and the District Alignment web page, which states:

1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED

The Next Generation of Transit Signal Priority: Cloud Computing and the TSP-as-a-Service Model

Virginia s Involvement in Connected Vehicles. Melissa Lance Virginia Department of Transportation June 6, 2014

Public-Private Partnerships in Transit

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association

Transcription:

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Arterial Performance Measures Framework Anita Vandervalk-Ostrander Iteris, Inc. Santa Ana, California, USA Steven Gota, Deputy Executive Office Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, CA, USA Viggen Davidian Iteris, Inc. Los Angeles, California, USA Lisa Young TransLink, Fullerton, California, USA Abstract Los Angeles County has over 5,000 miles of arterial streets which are maintained and operated by 89 local agencies within the county. This extensive network is an integral component of the overall Countywide multi-modal transportation system and is the vital link between the local/collector streets and the regional highways and freeways. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) launched a performance monitoring initiative in 2014 to assess the feasibility of developing a countywide Arterial Performance Measurement Program. The program includes arterial performance measures, data identification, corridor selection, analysis techniques, and testing analytical tools to demonstrate and visualize performance results. To date, the Program has achieved the following: 1. Demonstrated that the concept of a countywide Arterial Performance Measurement program is feasible and should be pursued. 2. Developed a Baseline Tool with arterial measures results for LA County 3. Assessed performance measurement vendor analytic packages 4. Conducted a Pilot Test as a proof of concept for the analytical tool and 5. Conducted extensive collaboration with LA County agencies, council of governments, and local cities through an outreach process. This paper provides an overview of the process and highlights the innovative approaches to this comprehensive arterial performance measures program featuring a variety of data sources and analytic tools. KEYWORDS: Arterial Performance Measures, Big Data, Analytic Tools - 1 -

Introduction Over the years, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) has been closely collaborating with its local partner agencies to implement a wide range of arterial improvements including signal synchronization, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) investments, and bus speed improvements to improve mobility and reliability in the County. Understanding how well a transportation system performs will greatly help target the right projects to address local and regional mobility and reliability needs. In 2014, Metro conducted the Arterial Performance Measurement Framework initiative to assess the feasibility of developing a countywide Arterial Performance Measurement Program. The study demonstrated that the concept of a countywide Arterial Performance Measurement Program is feasible. To further provide a proof of concept, the Arterial Performance Measurement Pilot was initiated in 2017 to test a vendor analytical package within a sub region of Los Angeles County (LA County). The Arterial Performance Measurement Pilot tested the effectiveness of a performance monitoring analytical package for LA County s complex arterial and highway system. This paper is organized in the following sections: Framework Describes the goals, components and measures of the Framework Baseline Conditions Analysis Describes the process and results of the Baseline analysis Arterial Performance Measures Pilot Describes the results of the pilot test Framework The Countywide Arterial Performance Measure Framework is comprised of five components: performance measures, data collection/sources, data management, a performance measurement tool and provision of input to planning processes. These components are shown in the figure below. - 2 -

Figure 1 Components of the Arterial Performance Measures Framework The Framework was designed to accomplish the following goals: Support future deployment of operational improvements by participating agencies; Create a process to monitor and report on mobility performance on arterial corridors throughout the county; Identify a tool for a countywide Performance Measurement Program; Measure the effectiveness of arterial Transportation System Management (TSM) improvements after they are in place; Develop a continuous data source and archive available over time for cities to use for project planning and grant applications; Provide useful tools to support local agency and sub regional operations and planning efforts; and Develop consistent methods for mobility performance measures calculations and reporting countywide. The Framework is not intended to: Require additional data collection from cities; Include transit operations performance data; - 3 -

The recommended performance measures for the Framework were selected based on national and local research and were vetted extensively with outreach to regional stakeholders. The measures are as follows: vehicle hours of delay, person hours of delay, travel-time variability, travel-time reliability, vehicle miles traveled, average travel speed, and average travel time. The data required to support these measures includes travel time, speed, volume, vehicle occupancy and certain roadway characteristics to allow for integrating the data. Extensive stakeholder collaboration occurred with the following groups: All cities within Metro, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works (LA DPW), City of Los Angeles (LADOT), Gateway Cities, North Los Angeles County, San Gabriel Valley, South Bay Cities, Westside Cities, Las Virgenes/Malibu, San Fernando Valley and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The Stakeholders agreed to a recommended arterial network for collecting and reporting data and performance measures. It is a combination of the Countywide Significant Arterial Network (CSAN) and the Countywide Significant Truck Arterial network (CSTAN) and is shown in Figure 2 below. Figure 2 Recommended Network Improved data management will be an important outcome of the Framework. This improved data management will be evident through the following capabilities: Support regional stakeholders in carrying out various goals and targets related to mobility these include performance measures reporting, data analysis, and before/after project analysis. Provide regional stakeholders with access to available archived travel time, speed, occupancy, volume, traffic signal systems operations data, and vendor probe data for the Framework network. All participating jurisdictions/agencies will have access, including any available data archived the previous day. This is not intended to provide real-time data. - 4 -

Support regional stakeholders as they conduct network analyses at both network and corridor levels. The corridor level analysis should allow for user selection of begin and end points for reporting. It should also include consistent methods for mobility performance measures calculations and reporting. Enable regional stakeholders to build, execute, save, and manage simple queries of the data. Allow regional stakeholders to export and/or display the results in a variety of standard file formats. Include data quality control statistics and flags with all query results. Baseline Conditions Analysis This stage of the project evaluated the performance of arterials throughout Los Angeles County to provide agencies and stakeholders with a detailed, reliable assessment of service on each part of the network, and to establish a baseline for evaluation of various arterial improvements and investments. To facilitate consistent and ongoing performance reporting, the project team developed a custom performance measurement methodology and data processing tool, which provided stakeholders with on-demand access to several key performance metrics at various levels of aggregation. This was a significant undertaking given the expansive arterial network in Los Angeles County with its nearly 20,500 miles of city and county road and tens of thousands of intersections. With the collaboration of partner agencies, this stage achieved the following key objectives: Established a list of arterials for the analysis; Conducted traffic counts on major arterials; Processed INRIX crowd-sourced speed data; Built an APM for each sub region; and Developed the Baseline Conditions Reports. Arterial Performance Measurement Pilot The Arterial Performance Measurement Pilot tested the effectiveness of a performance monitoring analytical package for LA County s complex arterial and highway system. The purpose of this pilot was to evaluate an analytics package that could best serve LA County and its sub regions. The objectives of this Pilot Project were to: Evaluate and test an Arterial Performance Monitoring Tool to assess arterial network performance; Conduct a pilot test based on a sub region in LA County; Utilize comprehensive arterial volume and travel time data; Collect user group input and assessments; and Demonstrate applicability for other sub regions. Using a combination of recent third party speed data and volume data collected as part of the Countywide Baseline Conditions project, the Pilot Project evaluated the performance of arterials using the described above (average speeds and travel times, vehicle and person miles traveled, and vehicle and person hours of delay.) Based on an evaluation of transportation performance measures, usability, technical and cost criteria as described in the Arterial Performance Measurement Framework, ipems offered the most applicable use for the Arterial Performance Measurement Pilot. Key elements of the Arterial Performance Measurement Pilot s vendor analytical tool include: A countywide cloud-based dashboard available to local agencies; Ability to evaluate arterials within an LA County sub region; Builds on data collected in the Countywide Baseline Conditions Analysis, including traffic count and speed data; Allows for customizable reporting on arterial performance for a variety of metrics; Customizable routes to evaluate a variety of facilities and services; and Streamlines the process for reporting on arterial performance projects. - 5 -

To conduct the Pilot, the team collected two months of data into a database for the selected region. All (the entire LA County) historical traffic data from Inrix was input into ipems. Using ipems and associated data set, the team conducted a pilot test including collection, analysis, integration and reporting of data and performance measures for a subset of the region using the approved data set. Results from the Pilot Project demonstrated Metro s commitment to its Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and the operational and monitoring goals for LA County. - 6 -