Data Acquisition. Chapter 2

Similar documents
+ = Spatial Analysis of Raster Data. 2 =Fault in shale 3 = Fault in limestone 4 = no Fault, shale 5 = no Fault, limestone. 2 = fault 4 = no fault

Map Analysis of Raster Data I 3/8/2018

MAPPING POISSON S RATIO OF UNCONSOLIDATED MATERIALS FROM A JOINT ANALYSIS OF SURFACE-WAVE AND REFRACTION EVENTS INTRODUCTION

Gravity Methods (VII) wrap up

3D modeling of the Quest Projects Geophysical Datasets. Nigel Phillips

Noise in FTG Data and its Comparison With Conventional Gravity Surveys

Geophysics 224 B2. Gravity anomalies of some simple shapes. B2.1 Buried sphere

L 5 Seismic Method. Courtesy of ExxonMobil. Mitchum et al., 1977b

product description product capabilities

We LHR5 06 Multi-dimensional Seismic Data Decomposition for Improved Diffraction Imaging and High Resolution Interpretation

CIPC Louis Mattar. Fekete Associates Inc. Analytical Solutions in Well Testing

Engineering and Environmental Geophysics with terratem

Introduction to Geophysical Inversion

Efficient 3D Gravity and Magnetic Modeling

Chapter N/A: The Earthquake Cycle and Earthquake Size

Inversion after depth imaging

MATHEMATICS Grade 4 Standard: Number, Number Sense and Operations. Organizing Topic Benchmark Indicator Number and Number Systems

Introduction to Geophysical Modelling and Inversion

Seismic Reflection Method

Geometric theory of inversion and seismic imaging II: INVERSION + DATUMING + STATIC + ENHANCEMENT. August Lau and Chuan Yin.

GG450 4/5/2010. Today s material comes from p and in the text book. Please read and understand all of this material!

COMBINING MULTIPLE GEOPHYSICAL DATA SETS INTO A SINGLE 3D IMAGE. Abstract

Simultaneous joint inversion of refracted and surface waves Simone Re *, Claudio Strobbia, Michele De Stefano and Massimo Virgilio - WesternGeco

ANALYSIS OF GEOPHYSICAL POTENTIAL FIELDS A Digital Signal Processing Approach

WinGLink. Geophysical interpretation software VERSION

Electromagnetic migration of marine CSEM data in areas with rough bathymetry Michael S. Zhdanov and Martin Čuma*, University of Utah

Name Date Grade Mathematics K

Question: What are the origins of the forces of magnetism (how are they produced/ generated)?

Gravity Gradients in PreStack Depth Migration

3-D vertical cable processing using EOM

Three critical concerns for marine seismics with portable systems. Source strength and tuning Streamer length 2D vs. 3D

Effects of multi-scale velocity heterogeneities on wave-equation migration Yong Ma and Paul Sava, Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines

SUMMARY. method to synthetic datasets is discussed in the present paper.

Refraction Full-waveform Inversion in a Shallow Water Environment

Lawrence Public Schools Mathematics Curriculum Map, Geometry

Coupled Wave Field Migration. Coupled Wave Field Migration

G012 Scattered Ground-roll Attenuation for 2D Land Data Using Seismic Interferometry

Magnetics. Introduction to Filtering using the Fourier Transform. Chuck Connor, Laura Connor. Potential Fields. Magnetics.

Geology 554 Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II Final Exam

Downloaded 05/09/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Multiple suppression with land data: A case study

Groveport Madison Local School District Third Grade Math Content Standards. Planning Sheets

Geogiga Seismic Pro 9.0 Release Notes

ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOL MATHEMATICS SCOPE AND SEQUENCE, K-5 STRAND: NUMERATION

CSAP Achievement Levels Mathematics Grade 6 March, 2006

An analysis of seismic information obtained from crooked line seismic surveys in crystalline rocks, Australia

SECOND GRADE Mathematic Standards for the Archdiocese of Detroit

PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS. Velocity Modeling - Time/Depth Conversion A COMPLETE SEISMIC INTERPRETATION SOLUTION

CCSSM Curriculum Analysis Project Tool 1 Interpreting Functions in Grades 9-12

RadExPro release notes

MiVu. Microseismic Processing System SURVEY DESIGN SIGNAL PROCESSING EVENT LOCATION VISUALIZATION.

Seismic Time Processing. The Basis for Modern Seismic Exploration

New Results on the Omega-K Algorithm for Processing Synthetic Aperture Radar Data

Scope and Sequence for the New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards

Year 9: Long term plan

cv R z design. In this paper, we discuss three of these new methods developed in the last five years.

Refraction Seismology. Chapter :: 6

Mathematics Fourth Grade Performance Standards

APPLICATION OF MATLAB IN SEISMIC INTERFEROMETRY FOR SEISMIC SOURCE LOCATION AND INTERPOLATION OF TWO DIMENSIONAL OCEAN BOTTOM SEISMIC DATA.

Montana City School GRADE 5

MATHEMATICS CONCEPTS TAUGHT IN THE SCIENCE EXPLORER, FOCUS ON EARTH SCIENCE TEXTBOOK

LECTURE 2 SPATIAL DATA MODELS

Foolproof AvO. Abstract

Andrew Lee BEng (Hons) CEng MIStructE FGS FPWS

Year 8 Mathematics Curriculum Map

Anatomy of common scatterpoint (CSP) gathers formed during equivalent offset prestack migration (EOM)

Y015 Complementary Data-driven Methods for Interbed Demultiple of Land Data

Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) active and passive methods

SeisSpace Software. SeisSpace enables the processor to be able focus on the science instead of being a glorified data manager.

EMIGMA V9.x Premium Series April 8, 2015

Multi-azimuth velocity estimation

number Understand the equivalence between recurring decimals and fractions

prismatic discretization of the digital elevation model, and their associated volume integration problems. Summary

Azimuthal binning for improved fracture delineation Gabriel Perez*, Kurt J. Marfurt and Susan Nissen

Introduction to FEM calculations

Relationship between Fourier Space and Image Space. Academic Resource Center

brahim KARA and Nihan HOSKAN

Big Ideas. Objects can be transferred in an infinite number of ways. Transformations can be described and analyzed mathematically.

How Deep Can My Magnetometer See?

Geogiga Seismic Pro 8.0 Release Notes

Chapter 5. 3D data examples REALISTICALLY COMPLEX SYNTHETIC INVERSION. Modeling generation and survey design

(x, y, z) m 2. (x, y, z) ...] T. m 2. m = [m 1. m 3. Φ = r T V 1 r + λ 1. m T Wm. m T L T Lm + λ 2. m T Hm + λ 3. t(x, y, z) = m 1

Alabama State Standards correlated to Merit Software Math Programs

Houghton Mifflin MATHEMATICS Level 5 correlated to NCTM Standard

3rd Grade Mathematics

Mathematics. Scheme of Work. Year 7. New Mathematics Framework

DESIGNER S NOTEBOOK Proximity Detection and Link Budget By Tom Dunn July 2011

We The Effects of Marine Data Acquisition Practices on Imaging in Complex Geological Setting - Modeling Study

DLM Mathematics Year-End Assessment Model Blueprint for New York State 1

GEOPHYS 242: Near Surface Geophysical Imaging. Class 8: Joint Geophysical Inversions Wed, April 20, 2011

Controlled stacking for improved quality of prestack depth-migration results

Seismic Attributes on Frequency-enhanced Seismic Data

Graphing Linear Equations and Inequalities: Graphing Linear Equations and Inequalities in One Variable *

JULY GRADE 6(MATHEMATICS) OBJECTIVE LEARNER PROFILE ATL INTERDISCIPLINARY TOPIC- NUMBER. Topic-1

College and Career Readiness Practice Workbooks. Series Crosswalks. Math. Science. Social Studies Reading

Three-dimensional inversion of borehole, time-domain, electromagnetic data for highly conductive ore-bodies.

2010 SEG SEG Denver 2010 Annual Meeting

Review of seismic imaging: Prestack

Successes and challenges in 3D interpolation and deghosting of single-component marinestreamer

Grade 4 ISTEP+ T1 #1-2 ISTEP+ T1 # Identify, describe and draw parallelograms, rhombuses, and ISTEP+ T1 #5-6

Transcription:

Data Acquisition Chapter 2

1 st step: get data Data Acquisition Usually data gathered by some geophysical device Most surveys are comprised of linear traverses or transects Typically constant data spacing Perpendicular to target Resolution based on target Best for elongated targets When the data is plotted (after various calculations have been made): Profile

Grids When transects are combined a grid can be formed. Good for round or blob-shaped targets Or if target geometry is unknown Useful for making contour maps Allows transects to be created in multiple directions

Data Reduction Often the raw data collected is not useful. Data must be converted to a useful form Removing the unwanted signals in data: Reduction Targets are often recognized by an anomaly in the data Values are above or below the surrounding data averages. Not all geophysical targets produce spatial anomalies. E.g. seismic refraction produces travel time curves depth to interfaces Also a type of reduction.

Signal and Noise Even after data is reduced, a profile may not reveal a clear anomaly due to noise. Noise: Unwanted fluctuations in measured data. May be spatial or temporal What causes noise? Signal: The data you want, i.e. no noise. Noise can be removed using mathematical techniques Stacking Fourier Analysis Signal Processing Magnetic or Gravity profile

Stacking Stacking is useful when: Noise is random Signal is weak Instrument is not sensitive If noise is random Take multiple readings Sum the readings Noise cancels out Destructive Interference Signal should add Constructive Interference Stacking improves signal to noise ratio Commonly used with numerous techniques.

Resolution Even if you have a good signal to noise ratio, detection of your target depends on your resolution. Know what you are looking for before you begin Know the limits of your data resolution

Modeling Most geophysical data is twice removed from actual geological information Reduced data is modeled Models Aim to describe a specific behavior or process Are only as complex as the data allows Occam s Razor: Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily

GPS Station Motions Model Types Depth = D Fault Slip In the most basic sense models come in two flavors: Forward model Given some set of variables, what is the result. I.e. you input the cause and some effect is produced Inverse model Given some measurements, what caused them You know the effect, try to determine the cause Often involves mathematical versions of guess and check

Model Types Models also come in several flavors based on technique Conceptual Model Models an idea no math/physical parts Analog Model A tangible model scaled to reproduce geologic phenomena Empirical Model Based on trends in data Analytical Model Solves an equation Usually deals with simple systems Numerical Model Computer-based approximations to an equation. Thousands, millions, or billions of calculations Can handle complex systems. Analog Model Empirical Model From Wells & Coppersmith 1994

Non-Uniqueness of Models Typically, multiple models can fit data So any given model is nonunique Distinguish between models based on Match with geologic data Model with least parameters (most simple) Data has limited resolution Surveys must be finite Blurs the picture Omission of detail emphasizes key features

Geologic Interpretation After data is collected and modeling is complete the results must be interpreted into the geological context. Use all available data. Don t only look, when you can hear and touch! Interpretations are also typically non-unique Many geologic materials have similar properties. Best interpretations use all available data, geologic, geophysical, chemical, etc Material Density (gm/cm 3 ) Air ~0 Water 1 Sediments 1.7-2.3 Sandstone 2.0-2.6 Shale 2.0-2.7 Limestone 2.5-2.8 Granite 2.5-2.8 Basalts 2.7-3.1 Metamorphic Rocks 2.6-3.0