Performance of the MRPC based Time Of Flight detector of ALICE at LHC

Similar documents
PoS(High-pT physics09)036

Time and position resolution of high granularity, high counting rate MRPC for the inner zone of the CBM-TOF wall

The STAR Time-of-Flight System

Performance of the ATLAS Inner Detector at the LHC

PoS(Baldin ISHEPP XXII)134

TORCH: A large-area detector for precision time-of-flight measurements at LHCb

Muon Reconstruction and Identification in CMS

ALICE tracking system

Stefania Beolè (Università di Torino e INFN) for the ALICE Collaboration. TIPP Chicago, June 9-14

CMS Conference Report

The ATLAS Conditions Database Model for the Muon Spectrometer

Status of the TORCH time-of-flight detector

ATLAS, CMS and LHCb Trigger systems for flavour physics

First LHCb measurement with data from the LHC Run 2

A New Segment Building Algorithm for the Cathode Strip Chambers in the CMS Experiment

Direct photon measurements in ALICE. Alexis Mas for the ALICE collaboration

Design and construction of Micromegas detectors for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Upgrade

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 11 Mar 2002

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 18 Jan 2011

THE ATLAS INNER DETECTOR OPERATION, DATA QUALITY AND TRACKING PERFORMANCE.

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

PoS(IHEP-LHC-2011)002

Electron and Photon Reconstruction and Identification with the ATLAS Detector

Tracking and flavour tagging selection in the ATLAS High Level Trigger

Performance of the GlueX Detector Systems

Full Offline Reconstruction in Real Time with the LHCb Detector

Adding timing to the VELO

Update of the BESIII Event Display System

Performance of Tracking, b-tagging and Jet/MET reconstruction at the CMS High Level Trigger

Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector tracking system

PoS(ACAT08)101. An Overview of the b-tagging Algorithms in the CMS Offline Software. Christophe Saout

Results on Long Term Performances and Laboratory Tests on the L3 RPC system at LEP. Gianpaolo Carlino INFN Napoli

SiPMs for Čerenkov imaging

Update of the BESIII Event Display System

Robustness Studies of the CMS Tracker for the LHC Upgrade Phase I

PoS(TIPP2014)204. Tracking at High Level Trigger in CMS. Mia TOSI Universitá degli Studi di Padova e INFN (IT)

Tracking and Vertexing performance in CMS

b-jet identification at High Level Trigger in CMS

Event reconstruction in STAR

MIP Reconstruction Techniques and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering

1. INTRODUCTION 2. MUON RECONSTRUCTION IN ATLAS. A. Formica DAPNIA/SEDI, CEA/Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette CEDEX, France

Fast pattern recognition with the ATLAS L1Track trigger for the HL-LHC

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

The Present and Future of Time-Of-Flight

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)492. Performance and recent developments of the real-time track reconstruction and alignment of the LHCb detector.

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.ins-det] 18 Dec 1998

ATLAS NOTE. December 4, ATLAS offline reconstruction timing improvements for run-2. The ATLAS Collaboration. Abstract

SNIC Symposium, Stanford, California April The Hybrid Parallel Plates Gas Counter for Medical Imaging

π ± Charge Exchange Cross Section on Liquid Argon

ATLAS ITk Layout Design and Optimisation

Timing properties of MCP-PMT

The ALICE electromagnetic calorimeter high level triggers

Time of CDF (II)

Radiation tests of key components of the ALICE TOF TDC Readout Module

CMS Alignement and Calibration workflows: lesson learned and future plans

Track reconstruction of real cosmic muon events with CMS tracker detector

PoS(ACAT08)100. FROG: The Fast & Realistic OPENGL Event Displayer

Primary Vertex Reconstruction at LHCb

for the DESY/ ECFA study detector

Analogue, Digital and Semi-Digital Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE AHCAL

Simulation study for the EUDET pixel beam telescope

Endcap Modules for the ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker

Charged Particle Tracking at Cornell: Gas Detectors and Event Reconstruction

PoS(ACAT)049. Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector. Roland Haertel Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany

PERFORMING TRACK RECONSTRUCTION AT THE ALICE TPC USING A FAST HOUGH TRANSFORM METHOD

Charged Particle Reconstruction in HIC Detectors

CMS High Level Trigger Timing Measurements

Charged Particle Tracking at Cornell: Gas Detectors and Event Reconstruction

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)523. The CMS trigger in Run 2. Mia Tosi CERN

Expected Performances of the scintillator counters Time Of Flight system of the AMS-02 experiment

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Real-time Analysis with the ALICE High Level Trigger.

GEM TPC Anode Pad Shape Studies

Set up and programming of an ALICE Time-Of-Flight trigger facility and software implementation for its Quality Assurance (QA) during LHC Run 2

SoLID GEM Detectors in US

TORCH. A Cherenkov based Time of Flight detector. Maarten van Dijk On behalf of the TORCH collaboration

Measurement of fragmentation cross-section of 400 MeV/u 12 C beam on thin targets

SoLID GEM Detectors in US

Updated impact parameter resolutions of the ATLAS Inner Detector

The performance of the ATLAS Inner Detector Trigger Algorithms in pp collisions at the LHC

Open charm measurements with new Vertex Detector at NA61/SHINE experiment at CERN SPS

Track reconstruction with the CMS tracking detector

TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction

Tracking and Vertex reconstruction at LHCb for Run II

A proximity focusing RICH with time-of-flight capabilities

Inside-out tracking at CDF

Studies of the KS and KL lifetimes and

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 13 Dec 2018

Quad Module Hybrid Development for the ATLAS Pixel Layer Upgrade

Physics CMS Muon High Level Trigger: Level 3 reconstruction algorithm development and optimization

First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator

Optimisation Studies for the CLIC Vertex-Detector Geometry

VERY HIGH VOLTAGE CONTROL FOR ALICE TPC

8.882 LHC Physics. Track Reconstruction and Fitting. [Lecture 8, March 2, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

The CLICdp Optimization Process

TPC digitization and track reconstruction: efficiency dependence on noise

The GAP project: GPU applications for High Level Trigger and Medical Imaging

High Level Trigger System for the LHC ALICE Experiment

Klaus Dehmelt EIC Detector R&D Weekly Meeting November 28, 2011 GEM SIMULATION FRAMEWORK

The Progress of TOF on BESIII

Transcription:

Performance of the MRPC based Time Of Flight detector of ALICE at LHC (for the ALICE Collaboration) Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche "Enrico Fermi", Rome, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica dell Universitá and Sezione INFN, Bologna, Italy E-mail: alici@bo.infn.it The large Time Of Flight (TOF) array is one of the main detectors devoted to charged hadron identification in the mid rapidity region of the ALICE experiment at the LHC. It allows separation among pions, kaons and protons up to a few GeV/c, covering the full azimuthal angle and -0.9 < η < 0.9. The TOF exploits the innovative MRPC technology capable of an intrinsic time resolution better than 50 ps with an efficiency close to 100% and a large operational plateau; the full array consists of 1593 MRPCs covering a cylindrical surface of 141 m 2. In this report, the TOF performance during the 2010 and 2011 data taking periods is reported together with selected physics results obtained with pp and Pb Pb collisions. XI workshop on Resistive Plate Chambers and Related Detectors - RCP2012, February 5-10, 2012 INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Italy Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/

1. Introduction ALICE [1] (A Large Ion Collider Experiment) is the dedicated heavy ion experiment at the CERN LHC designed to address the physics of strongly interacting matter and the quark gluon plasma at extreme values of energy density. ALICE is also studying proton proton collisions both for comparison with Pb Pb collisions and in physics areas where ALICE is complementary with other LHC experiments. Particle IDentification (PID) is a crucial aspect of the ALICE experiment and it is performed by combining different detecting systems [2]. The Time Of Flight (TOF) system [3] is devoted to charged hadron identification in the mid rapidity region. It aims at 3σ π/k and K/p separation for momenta up to 2.5 GeV/c and 4 GeV/c respectively; in order to reach this goal the TOF must provide a time resolution better than 100 ps. The TOF is a large area detector covering a cylindrical surface of 141 m 2 with an inner radius of 3.7 m, a pseudorapidity interval [-0.9,+0.9] and full azimuthal coverage. The TOF exploits the innovative Multigap Resistive Plate Chamber (MRPC) [4] technology, capable of an intrinsic time resolution better than 50 ps with an efficiency close to 100% and a large operational plateau. The whole system is made of 1593 MRPCs arranged into 90 gas tight modules which are grouped into 18 SuperModules (SM) each covering an azimuthal angle of 20 degrees. 2. Design of the ALICE TOF Multigap RPC The MRPCs for the ALICE TOF detector are designed as double stack strips of 7.4 120 cm 2 active area. Each stack has 5 gas gaps of 250 µm width; the two stacks are placed on each side of a central anode. The resistive plates are made of high resistivity ( 10 13 Ωcm) soda lime commercial glass 0.4 mm thick. The glass plates have been chosen to ensure the high uniformity of the gap size needed to achieve a very high time resolution; however the glass demonstrated also a good stability for long term behavior. External electrodes are obtained from 550 µm thick glasses; the high voltage is applied on the outer surface of this plates by means of a specially developed acrylic paint loaded with metal oxides giving a surface resistivity between 2 and 25 MΩ/. The pick up elements are 2.5 3.5 cm 2 area pads (96 per strip) placed outside the external plates and arranged in two row arrays of 48 pads; the choice of this area for the readout pads was driven by the request to limit the occupancy at the 15% level even in the case of Pb Pb collisions where some 10 3 primary charged particles per unit of rapidity were expected. The applied electric field is very high, greater than 100 kv/cm. For these values, the growth of the avalanche in the gas volume is dominated by space charge effects and the MRPC can be operated in saturated avalanche mode; the average charge produced by a through going particle is at the level of 2 3 pc. The gas mixture used in the ALICE experiment is a non flammable mixture composed by 93% of C 2 H 2 F 4 and 7% of SF 6. Test beam results may be found in [5, 6], where a time resolution better than 50 ps, including all of the electronic readout contribution, and an efficiency close to 100% with a long streamer free efficiency plateau have been measured. 3. Rate capability, ageing and efficiency The rate capability of the MRPCs has been checked with dedicated tests at the Gamma Ir- 2

] 2 flux [Hz/cm 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 flux luminosity 0 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 time [arbitrary units] 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Figure 1: Flux of charged particles at TOF and ALICE instantaneous luminosity as a function of time during the 2011 LHC heavy ion runs. Inst. luminosity [Hz/b] Eff match 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Match Eff Positive Data Match Eff Negative Data Match Eff Positive MC Match Eff Negative MC Performance 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 p (GeV/c) t Figure 2: TOF track matching efficiency, as a function of p t, compared for positive and negative particles in real data and in MC. radiation Facility (GIF) at CERN [7, 8]; these tests demonstrated that the MPRCs designed for the ALICE TOF can operate far in excess of the 50Hz/cm 2, which is the maximum rate expected at TOF assuming a charged particle density of dn ch /dη = 8000 for central Pb Pb collisions and L = 10 27 cm 2 s 1 of luminosity. The main reason is the small amount of charge produced for each through going particle. However, from analysis of 2010 Pb Pb data at s NN = 2.76 TeV a particle density of dn ch /dη = 2000 can be assumed. In Fig. 1 the estimated flux of charged particles at TOF and the instantaneous luminosity in ALICE are showed as a function of time. The flux has been estimated by multiplying the measured single trigger pad rate (each trigger pad covers 888 cm 2 equivalent to the area of one MRPC) for the measured average number of hits per trigger pad. Before the ramp of the luminosity, a small dark rate of 0.1 0.2 Hz/cm 2 is observed. After the ramp, the TOF single trigger pad rate is proportional to the luminosity. The estimated flux of charged particles is 7 Hz/cm 2 for a luminosity of L = 4 10 26 cm 2 s 1. The current drawn by the full detector for these values of the luminosity is at the level of a few tens of µa for 1593 MRPCs, less than 25nA per MRPC. By dividing the current for the flux of charged particles we get an average charge produced inside the MRPC by a through going particle of the order of 3 pc; this is the same value measured during the tests with beam of charged particles in the R&D phase with MRPCs from the mass production. It is an indication that no ageing effects are present in the MRPC, as already pointed out during dedicated tests [8, 9]. The small current and the low noise rate allow to use the TOF as a trigger detector in ALICE. Thus, the TOF trigger is the preferred choice for cosmic runs in ALICE, with a rate around 10 Hz for pure back to back topology and 50% of purity [10]. These results have been achieved running all the MRPCs at the same voltage and with all front end electronic thresholds set at the same value. During the 2010 and 2011 LHC heavy ion program the TOF contributed also to the trigger of Ultra Peripheral Collisions (UPC) in the barrel. Also the MRPCs efficiency appears to be stable over time. In Fig. 2 the TOF track matching 3

efficiency, defined as the ratio between the number of tracks reconstructed in the TPC that have produced a detectable signal on TOF and the total number of tracks reconstructed in the TPC, is compared for positive and negative particles in a Monte Carlo (MC) sample and with pp collisions recorded in 2010 for different p t values. To be noted that the matching efficiency includes not only the MRPC efficiencies but also dead spaces in the TOF array, particle decays, interaction with materials as well as inefficiencies of the algorithm. In the MC the single pad efficiency is 98%, averaged over the whole pad area and as measured in the test beam. The good match between MC and real data, for this and for other particle samples, indicates that the TOF efficiency is similar to the 98% used in the MC simulations, of the same order of that measured during the MRPC mass production. 4. TOF PID performance A time of flight measurement yield the velocity of a charged particle by measuring the particle flight time t over a given distance along the track trajectory L; the particle flight time can be expressed as t = time hit - t 0, where time hit is the time measurement made by the TOF detector while t 0 is the time of the interaction, measured in ALICE by means of: A. a dedicated Cherenkov detector (T0); B. TOF detector itself if the number of tracks reaching the TOF is large enough ( 3) to perform a global time minimization; C. the average t 0 of LHC fill, if A or B are not available (on an event by event basis). A measurement of the TOF global time resolution can be performed by plotting the distribution of the difference between measured and expected time of arrival of pions on TOF and by fitting it with a gaussian function, as in Fig. 3 where pion candidates have been selected by TPC de/dx measurements. In this plot TOF means the time measured by the TOF detector while TOF(π,exp) is the expected time of arrival on TOF and it is computed during reconstruction by ALICE core central tracking; the red curve shows the gaussian fit to the data. The plot has been obtained with Pb Pb collisions at s NN = 2.76 TeV recorded in November 2010. The result of the fit shows a TOF time resolution of 86 ps; the same results are obtained for 2011 data. The value quoted here includes the intrinsic time resolution of the detector technology plus contributions from electronics (amplification and time to digital conversion), uncertainties arising from the distribution of the digital clock from the LHC to the experiments, the spread of the t 0 signal (here 10 ps obtained with method B), contributions from the tracking and from calibration. In future the latter can be improved by: - single channel time slewing corrections (finite rise time of the amplifying electronics); - time walk corrections (signal propagation delays on the pick up pad). In Fig. 4 the achieved separation for π/k and K/p as a function of transverse momentum in TOF is shown. A two sigma separation is achieved up to 3 GeV for π/k and up to 5 GeV for K/p 4

Performance of the MRPC based Time Of Flight detector of ALICE at LHC Figure 4: Expected separation (nsigma) for π/k and K/p as a function of transverse momentum in TOF. Green points < (tk,exp tπ,exp )/σ (K) >, red points < (t p,exp tk,exp )/σ (p) >. Figure 5: TOF measured particle β vs. momen tum for Pb Pb collisions at snn = 2.76 TeV. Figure 6: Four anti-alpha candidates (indicated in red) found in ALICE in 16 million Pb-Pb events. The insert shows the combined mass measurement with the TOF system. even with a still non optimal calibration. The plot is based on expected integrated times at TOF smeared according experimental resolution achieved in Pb Pb central collisions for the different contributions. In Fig. 5 a plot of the TOF measured β as a function of momentum, obtained in Pb Pb collisions at snn = 2.76 TeV is shown. The different particle species are clearly visible. 5. Analysis with TOF The TOF information is an important part of the PID analysis which is a distinguished feature of the ALICE experiment. Here follow a few examples. Fig. 6 shows the TPC de/dx vs rigidity distribution for all events passing the offline trigger 5 Figure 3: Distribution of the difference between measured and expected time of arrival on TOF for selected pions. The red curve shows the gaussian fit to the data.

selection of events with at least one Z>1 track candidate; only negatively charged particles are shown. Above a rigidity of p/z = 2.3GeV/c however the de/dx bands from 3 He and 4 He are overlapping and the mass calculated with the TOF is needed to separate these two species. The insert shows the combined mass measurement with the TOF system which is in particular needed to separate the candidate with the largest momentum from the 3 He line. Moreover the TOF information allows us: i to extend the p t reach of the spectra and the analysis of the anisotropic flow of identified hadrons; ii to identify weak decays of strange particles with a sufficiently long lifetime via their characteristic decay topology; iii to improve the separation between electrons and pions in the TPC, by removing the slower hadrons, for a given momentum, with a cut on the particle velocity. 6. Conclusion The ALICE TOF detector has been taking data in 2010 and 2011 LHC physics runs with high performance in terms of dark current, noise, efficiency and time resolution. No evidences of ageing effects, as increase of dark current or performance degradation, have been observed after two years of data taking, confirming the results of ageing tests carried out during the R&D phase which have clearly indicated that ageing is not an issue for the MRPCs designed for the ALICE TOF. During the 2010 and 2011 data taking the TOF successfully provided particle identification both for pp and Pb Pb collisions and many analysis carried out by the ALICE Collaboration are widely using information provided by the TOF detector. References [1] ALICE Collaboration, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 30 (2004) 1517; J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 32 (2006) 1295; IOP JINST 3 (2008) S08002. [2] ALICE Collaboration, ALICE: physics performance report, volume II, J. Phys. G32 (2006) 1295 2040. [3] ALICE Collaboration, Addendum to TOF Technical Design Report, CERN/LHCC 2002 016. [4] E. Cerron Zeballos et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A374, 132 (1996). [5] A. Akindinov et al, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A532, 611 621 (2004). [6] A. Akindinov et al, Nuovo Cimento B124, 235 253 (2009). [7] A. Akindinov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A490, 58 70 (2002). [8] A. Alici et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A579, 979 988 (2007). [9] A. Akindinov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A533, 93 97 (2004). [10] A. Akindinov et al, Eur. Phys. J. C68, 89 108 (2010). 6