Victim Personal Statements 2017/18

Similar documents
Victim Personal Statements 2016/17

Making a Victim Personal Statement. You have a voice in the criminal justice system and have a right to explain how the crime has affected you

YouGov / Fugu PR Survey Results

NORTH YORKSHIRE POLICE

The SAPS Johannesburg Area Police Transformation Survey Results

Life Domain: Crime and Public Safety Goal Dimension: Objective Living Conditions Measurement Dimension: Crime Load

UK Perspectives on Cyber Crime: victims, offences and offenders

Basic facts about Dudley

Application for Membership of the Association for Solution Focused Hypnotherapy

Life Domain: Crime and Public Safety Goal Dimension: Objective Living Conditions Measurement Dimension: Crime Load

Emergency Mobile Alert system. Follow-up survey for the nationwide test on Sunday 26 November 2017

European Investigation Order: Frequently Asked Questions

2013 Local Arts Agency Salary & Benefits Summary EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO

The Rise of the Connected Viewer

student finance wales ALG FE Assembly Learning Grant Application Form for academic year 2013/14 SFW/ALG/F/V1314/A

THE AP/AOL POLL CONDUCTED BY IPSOS PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROJECT # ONLINE VIDEO STUDY

Statement of Chief Richard Beary President of the International Association of Chiefs of Police

Telecommunications Customer Satisfaction

Privacy Policy. England Athletics Limited commitment to Privacy. Introduction. The information we collect about you. The information provided to us

U.S. TV and Internet Providers: Competing services for mobile consumers TV time. Market Study Second Quarter 2017

Sussex Police Business Crime Strategy

The Growing Gap between Landline and Dual Frame Election Polls

Segmented or Overlapping Dual Frame Samples in Telephone Surveys

Guiding principles on the Global Alliance against child sexual abuse online

2013 CONSUMER MOBILE INSIGHTS STUDY!

4.1 Recent developments in 57 Northern Ireland. 4.2 Service take up Satisfaction with telecoms services 66

THE VIRTUAL COURT PROTOTYPE

Content. Key features Size of workforce Workforce & workplace statistics Size of workforce Occupations Gender Age

DOMESTIC ABUSE DEATH REVIEW TEAM Fatality Review Data Collection Form. Unknown

Cybersecurity 2016 Survey Summary Report of Survey Results

Delivery Plan Working together to make our communities safer. transform. innovate. efficient. police. public. effective

Mobile Access July 7, 2010 Aaron Smith, Research Specialist.

Director, Major Projects and Resilience. To: Planning and Performance Committee 6 November 2014

Child Online Protection in Child Pornography Namibia

NWQ Capital Management Pty Ltd. Privacy Policy. March 2017 v2

Domestic Violence Client Intake Form

2017 retail crime survey. summary

FIRE REDUCTION STRATEGY. Fire & Emergency Services Authority GOVERNMENT OF SAMOA April 2017

DATA MEMO. The volume of spam is growing in Americans personal and workplace accounts, but users are less bothered by it.

CRIME ANALYSIS SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

Mobile Internet & Smartphone Adoption

Pathways CIC Privacy Policy. Date Issued: May Date to be Reviewed: May Issued by Yvonne Clarke

emarketer US Social Network Usage StatPack

ROI CASE STUDY IBM SPSS CITY OF LANCASTER. ROI: 1301% Payback: 1.5 months Average annual benefit: $1,344,338. Cost : Benefit Ratio 1 : 45.

Motorola Mobility Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs)

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Police Report Environmental Management. Reg. No. EMS

Survey Questions and Methodology

2017 PIT Summary: Boulder County

Questions, Variables, and Values Capabilities. C01 Does your health in any way limit your daily activities compared to most people of your age?

Survey Questions and Methodology

Privacy Impact Assessment

Disrupting the Personal Lives

Privacy Notice - General Data Protection Regulation ( GDPR )

A Study of Distracted Driving in New Jersey 2016

The State of the American Traveler TM

Serious and Organised Crime Strategy - Local delivery

Cyber Security Strategy

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

Mission Statement: Cuyahoga County Department of Justice Affairs

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONDUCTING A PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON SURVEILLANCE CAMERA SYSTEMS (CCTV)

Statisticians in the Federal Government: Producing Data on the Criminal Justice System

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONDUCTING A PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON SURVEILLANCE CAMERA SYSTEMS (CCTV)

Down Under Centre Employment Hub - Privacy Policy Introduction

Contents. 1. Survey Background and Methodology. 2. Summary of Key Findings. 3. Survey Results. 4. Appendix

2017 PIT Summary: Jefferson County

Better connections: Australian attitudes to mail and . November 2013

1/29/2009. Disparity arises at every decision point in the system. Pamela Oliver Department of Sociology University of Wisconsin - Madison

Practical Issues in Conducting Cell Phone Polling

National Business Crime Partnership Association

Application For Employment (Apprenticeship Application Form)

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

Department of Justice Policing and Victim Services BUSINESS PLAN

North Vancouver RCMP A Snapshot

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED. Public SPA Board Meeting Date 15 December 2016 Assembly Room, Tulliallan, Alloa

BCS ASSIST AGM Chairs Report. 6 th October 2011

DATA PROTECTION ACT 2018 RIGHT OF ACCESS SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST FORM

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

Seatbelt and Mobile Phone Usage Survey Scotland, 2014

ICADV LEGAL SERVICES REFERRAL FORM

SHOPLIFTING STOP THIEF!

APPENDIX G: Biennial Exhibition Device Survey Questions

INTRODUCTION. In this summary version, we present some of the key figures and charts.

This Privacy Policy was last updated on 21st May 2018.

Complaints, compliments and suggestions

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS

Michael Robinson Associates Limited is committed to protecting your personal information. This policy

Smartphone Ownership 2013 Update

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONDUCTING A PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON SURVEILLANCE CAMERA SYSTEMS (CCTV)

U.S. Home Broadband & Wi-Fi Usage Forecast, : More homes, Wi-Fi and data

Statutory Notifications

MCA Market Research Consumer Perceptions Survey fixed broadband. April 2018

Our history & where we are going together

DATA MEMO. BY: PIP Senior Research Fellow Deborah Fallows ( )

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Young Drivers Report the Highest Level of Phone Involvement in Crash or Near-Crash Incidences. Research Note

Information we collect about you: (Rewritten)

NinthDecimal Mobile Audience Q Insights Report

Mobile call termination. Research Annex

BRIDGEWATER SURGERIES. Privacy Notice

BODY CORPORATE REGISTRATION Application form

Transcription:

Victim Personal Statements / Analysis of the offer and take-up of Victim Personal Statements using the Crime Survey for England and Wales, April to March. October

Foreword A Victim Personal Statement (VPS) is one of the key entitlements available to victims in the Victims Code of Practice. It offers victims the opportunity to express how the crime has affected their lives physically, emotionally, financially or in any other way. Importantly, the VPS is articulated in the victim s own words. I have long supported this entitlement as an opportunity for victims to have a voice in the criminal justice system and to be heard. This is my fourth report examining data available on the VPS from the Crime Survey for England and Wales. These annual reports give me an insight into the provision and take-up of this important entitlement. They follow a review I conducted in, which made several recommendations for the government and heads of criminal justice agencies on how to improve the VPS process. My report examines the provision and take-up of the VPS for the year ending March. It scrutinises these aspects overall, as well as when broken down by demographic characteristics. It uses a longitudinal approach where possible, to establish whether provision has improved, worsened, or if it is unchanged from previous years. I am disappointed to report that the data reveals little progress being made since /. In terms of the proportion of victims offered the opportunity to make a VPS by police, only one in six victims were offered this opportunity. Yet more than half of victims who were offered a VPS chose to make one, and of those who did make a VPS, the majority felt it had been taken into account by the criminal justice system. There continues to be certain demographic groups who are less likely to be offered the opportunity to make a VPS. Here, I found discrepancies by age, religion, marital status, long-term illness/disability, area type, region and offence. Overall, these figures reiterate the importance of the VPS to those who make one, and how ensuring a VPS is offered to all victims is crucial. I welcome the recent publication of the Government s Victims Strategy and the proposed action to record and monitor when a VPS has been made. However, my report demonstrates yet again that victim entitlements are not always taken seriously. This is why I am calling for a Victims Law, which includes statutory rights for victims of crime, including the right to be informed, to be heard and to challenge. While Victim Personal Statements give victims the opportunity to be heard, they only become a reality if victims are informed of their entitlement to make one and if the purpose of the VPS is clearly explained to them. For too long, too many victims are not getting the opportunity to have their voices heard. A Victims Law can transform this and drive positive change for victims across the criminal justice system. 2

Headline findings Few victims report that they are offered the opportunity to make a Victim Personal Statement (VPS) and this has remained consistent since this topic was first included in the Crime Survey for England and Wales five years ago. In / victims were given the opportunity to make a VPS by Police in approximately every 1 in 6 incidents (% of all incidents). Contact Email: victims.commissioner@victimscommissioner.org.uk Overall, victims are no more or less likely to make a VPS than in previous years. In over half of all incidents (57%) where victims were given the opportunity to make a VPS by Police, victims decided to do so. Few victims who make a VPS have it read aloud in court. Some victims, who reported that their VPS was not read aloud in court, said they wanted it to have been. Just under 1 in 5 incidents (19%) where victims made a VPS, their statement was read aloud in court. Where victims had not had their VPS read aloud, victims in a quarter of these incidents (%) stated that they had said they wanted it to be read aloud. The reasons behind this figure are not clear. While the proportion of incidents where victims felt that their VPS had been taken into account by the Criminal Justice System was higher in / than in /, it also remained consistent with levels first reported in /. For approximately 7 in incidents (68%), victims who made a VPS felt that it had been taken into account by the Criminal Justice System. Contents Key findings by characteristic 4 Introduction 6 All Incidents 8 Age 11 Sex 12 Ethnicity Religion Marital Status Long-standing illness or disability Area Type Region Offence 19 Methodology There remains variation in these rates within and across certain demographic groups and offence types, suggesting that some victims are more or less likely to be offered their VPS entitlement in contrast to others. 3

Key findings by characteristic (i) Age In /, incidents with victims aged 35 to 44 years were slightly less likely to involve the victim being offered the opportunity to make a VPS compared to incidents overall. Incidents with victims aged to 24 years were more likely to involve the victim being offered a VPS. Sex There were no significant differences between the proportions of men and women who were offered the opportunity to make a VPS in / when compared to the average across all incidents. Men were, however, less likely to make a VPS when offered the opportunity to do so. Ethnicity In /, there were no significant differences observed between the average across all incidents and incidents involving victims of different ethnic groups. Religion Incidents in which the victim identifies as Christian were marginally less likely to see the victim offered a VPS than the average across all incidents. Marital status In incidents where the victim is married or in a civil partnership, victims were less likely to be given the opportunity to make a VPS than for incidents overall. Incidents where victims are single were more likely to see the victim offered a VPS when compared to the overall average. 4

Key findings by characteristic (ii) Long-standing illness or disability In incidents where the victim is without a long-standing illness or disability, victims were marginally less likely to be offered the opportunity to make a VPS in / when compared to all incidents. Incidents with victims who have a long-standing illness or disability were more likely to be offered a VPS. Area Type In /, incidents occurring in urban areas were marginally more likely to involve the victim being offered a VPS in comparison to incidents with all victims. Conversely, incidents occurring in rural areas were proportionately less likely to see the victim offered the opportunity to make a VPS. Region For incidents that took place in the North East and in the East of England, victims were less likely to be offered a VPS when compared to incidents overall. Incidents in the West Midlands were more likely to involve the victim being offered a VPS. Offence Incidents where victims were subject to vehicle-related theft and criminal damage and arson offences, were less likely to involve the victim being offered a VPS than all other incidents. 5

Introduction (i) A Victim Personal Statement (VPS) is the single key entitlement where victims are able to make a statement to explain how a crime has affected them physically, emotionally, financially or in any other way. The purpose of the VPS is to give victims a voice in the criminal justice process. It can be considered as part of the evidence before the court prior to sentencing if the defendant is found guilty. The VPS entitlement was first formalised in the version of the Code of Practice for Victims of Crime, and was continued in its update. Victims are entitled to say whether they would like to read their VPS aloud, or have it read aloud on their behalf, if a defendant is found guilty. While the Crime Survey for England and Wales only asks about VPS offered by the police, victims who have opted into the Victim Contact Scheme are also entitled to make a VPS at a parole hearing. Once a VPS is completed and signed, it cannot be changed or withdrawn although a further VPS may be submitted to the police to add or clarify points included in the original. The VPS will always be shared with the Crown Prosecution Service. If the case reaches court, the VPS will be served on the court and the defence if it is included as evidence in the trial, so the suspect in a case will usually be able to see it. For a more comprehensive review of the VPS read the report published by the Victims Commissioner. 6

Introduction (ii) This review looks at the questions in the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) outlined in the table below. The table also sets out the number of individuals who were asked this question in the survey (the unweighted survey base). This means the number asked these questions before any weights were applied to the data to ensure it is representative of the wider population. CSEW Question Victims of crime have an opportunity to make a formal statement to the police about how the crime affected them financially, physically or emotionally or in any other way. This is called a Victim Personal Statement. Did the police give you this opportunity? / Unweighted base / Unweighted base / Unweighted base / Unweighted base / Unweighted base 2,778 2,522 2,63 2,398 2,4 Did you make a Victim Personal Statement? 42 37 345 335 3 Was your Victim Personal Statement read aloud in court? Not asked Not asked 4 7 5 Did you say you wanted your Victim Personal Statement read aloud in court? Do you feel that what you said in your Victim Personal Statement was taken into account by the Criminal Justice System? Not asked Not asked 127 1 1 123 4 3 3 7

Proportion (%) All incidents (i) In /, in 1 in 6 incidents (%) victims were offered the opportunity to make a VPS by the police. There remains no significant change in the proportion of victims offered this opportunity when compared to previous years. In over half (57%) of incidents where victims were given the opportunity to make a VPS, the victim did so. Again, the proportion who chose to make a VPS is consistent with previous years. Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a Victim Personal Statement Proportion of incidents for which victims made a Victim Personal Statement 8 8 6 6 56 51 61 56 57 4 4 / / / / / / / / / / Base: 2,398-2,778 Base: 37-42 See slide 19 for base respondent numbers in details 8

Proportion (%) All incidents (ii) In /, in approximately 1 in 5 (19%) incidents where victims made a VPS, this statement was then read aloud in court. There was no significant change in this proportion from previous years. In the same year, in a quarter of incidents where victims did not have their VPS read aloud in court (%), these victims had said that they wanted their VPS to be read out. This remains consistent with the levels recorded in the two previous years this question had been asked. Proportion of incidents for which victims had their Victim Personal Statement read aloud in court Proportion of incidents for which victims wanted their Victim Personal Statement read aloud in court 8 8 6 6 4 21 19 4 31 19 / / / Base: 5-4 / / / Base: 1-127 See slide 19 for base respondent numbers in detail 9

Proportion (%) All incidents (iii) In /, the proportion of incidents in which victims felt that their VPS had been taken into account is higher than in the year ending March (at 68% compared to 57%). Overall, however, it remains consistent with all other levels recorded since /, when this question was first introduced. Proportion of incidents for which victims felt their VPS was taken into account by the Criminal Justice System 8 69 65 76 68 6 57 4 / / / / / Base: 123- See slide 19 for base respondent numbers in detail

Age In /, incidents involving victims aged to 24 years were more likely to include the victim being offered the opportunity to make a VPS than observed for all incidents (% compared to %). This is consistent with the previous year but higher than observed for the same age group in / and /. Incidents with victims aged 35 to 44 years were slightly less likely to involve the victim being offered the opportunity to make a VPS compared with incidents overall (% compared to % of all incidents). This was slightly lower than in the previous two years (/ and /). The proportion of incidents where victims were aged 55 to 64 years and were given the opportunity to make a VPS was higher than in / by six percentage points, however, it was not significantly different to the average across all incidents in /. The proportion of incidents involving victims aged 65 to 74 years, was higher than in / and /, but again this was not significantly different to the / average across all incidents. 3 Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a VPS by age of victim 23 19 9 12 8 19 19 12 8 8 7 11 5 / / / / / -24-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ Base: 1-593 11

Proportion (%) Sex There is no statistically significant difference in the proportion of incidents where a victim was offered the opportunity to make a VPS according to the victims sex. This has remained consistent over the five years this question has been included in the survey. Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a VPS by sex of victim Proportion of incidents in which victims made a VPS in / by sex of victim 3 8 66 6 All adults 46 4 5 / / / / / Men Women Base: 8-229 Men Gender Women Base: 9-3 Although there is no difference in the offer of making a VPS by sex, in / male victims were less likely to make a VPS when offered compared with all incidents. Over 2 in 5 (46%) incidents saw the male victim make a VPS compared to over half of incidents involving all victims (57%). Incidents involving female victims were more likely (66%) to involve the victim making a VPS when this had been offered compared with incidents involving all victims. This was also significantly higher than in / and / (66% compared to 54% and 56% respectively). 12

Ethnicity In / there were no significant differences observed between the overall average and incidents involving victims of different ethnic groups. Incidents involving victims who are White were marginally more likely to involve the victim being offered the opportunity to make a VPS compared to the same group in / (% in contrast to %), however this proportion remains consistent with all previous years, and the average across all incidents for /. There were no other significant changes observed when examining this data longitudinally. Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a VPS by ethnicity of victim 3 26 22 19 12 5 / / / / / White Asian Black Base: 68-2,47 *Data not reported for other ethnic groups due to small sample sizes

Religion Incidents involving victims who are Christian were marginally less likely to involve the victim being offered the opportunity to make a VPS than incidents involving all victims (% of incidents compared to % of all incidents). While consistent with the average across all incidents in /, incidents involving victims of no religion were more likely to see the victim offered the opportunity to make a VPS than the same group in / by four percentage pointsⁱ. The proportion has, however, remained consistent with all other years this question has been asked. 3 Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a VPS by religion of victim 27 21 5 / / / / / No religion Christian Muslim Other Base: 51-1,519 *Data not reported for other religious groups due to small sample sizes ⁱVariation from the difference between figures included on the graph due to rounding.

Marital Status Incidents involving victims who are married / in a civil partnership (%) were less likely to involve the victim being offered the opportunity to make a VPS than incidents involving all victims (%). This level is consistent with all previous years this question has been asked. Incidents where victims are single were more likely to involve the victim being offered the opportunity to make a VPS than incidents involving all victims (% compared to %). This was significantly higher than in / (% compared to %), though it remains consistent with all other previous years this question has been included in the survey. Incidents involving victims who are widowed (%) were less likely to involve the victim being offered the opportunity to make a VPS than they were in / by 22 percentage points. Similar to last year, however, this is likely to be a reflection of the sudden increase in the proportion of widowed victims offered a VPS in /. 45 4 Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a VPS by marital status of victim 4 35 3 22 22 19 19 12 12 12 21 11 9 5 / / / / / Married / civil partnered Cohabiting Single Separated Divorced / legally dissolved partnership Widowed Base: 99-1,72

Long-standing illness or disability In /, incidents involving victims who had a long-standing illness or disability were more likely to see the victim offered the chance to make a VPS by police than the average across all incidents (19% compared to % for all incidents). This is likely to have been influenced by incidents where victims have a long-standing illness or disability that limits activities, whereby the proportion of incidents where a VPS was offered was also greater than the average across all incidents (%). Incidents involving victims without a long-standing illness or disability were marginally less likely to involve the victim being offered a VPS when compared to all incidents (%). 3 Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a VPS by illness/ disability status of victim 19 19 19 5 / / / / / Long-standing illness or disability Limits activities Does not limit activities No long-standing illness or disability Base: 1-2,29 *Data not reported for other disability status groups due to small sample sizes For incidents involving victims with a long-standing illness or disability, and when this illness or disability limits activities, victims were more likely to make a VPS when offered the opportunity compared to the average across all incidents (66% and 67% made a VPS respectively compared to 57%). Incidents with victims who have no long-standing illness or disability were less likely to involve the victim making a VPS than the overall average (52% compared to 57% of all incidents).

Area type In /, incidents occurring in urban areas were marginally more likely to involve the victim being offered a VPS in comparison to all incidents (% compared to % of all incidents). This proportion was higher than in / (%) but remains consistent with other previous years. Conversely, incidents occurring in rural areas were proportionately less likely to see the victim offered the opportunity to make a VPS when compared to all incidents (11% compared to % of all incidents). This was lower than observed across the previous 12 months ending March (%) and in / (%). Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a VPS by area type in which the victim lives 11 11 5 / / / / / Urban Rural Base: 394-2,328

Region In /, for incidents occurring in the North East of England and East of England, victims were less likely to be offered the opportunity to make a VPS when compared to incidents across all regions. In both areas approximately 1 in (8%) incidents involved the victim being offered a VPS (8% and % respectively). This is in comparison to 1 in 6 (%) of all incidents. Incidents in the West Midlands were more likely to involve the victims being offered the opportunity to make a VPS when compared to all incidents (21%). This proportion has increased from / (%) and / (12%). 3 Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a VPS by region in which the victim lives 22 19 12 12 11 11 8 8 27 11 11 9 24 23 21 8 21 19 5 / / / / / North East North West Yorkshire and the Humber East Midlands West Midlands East of England London South East South West Wales Base: 2-361 While proportions have remained consistent in the North East, Wales, South West, East Midlands and the South East since /, for other regions there have been some fluctuations. In the North West, for example, the proportion of incidents in which victims were offered a VPS was not significantly different to the average across all incidents, but had increased from the previous 12 months (% compared to 9% in the year ending March ).

Offence Incidents where victims were subject to vehicle-related theft (%) and criminal damage and arson offences (%) were less likely to involve the victim being offered a VPS than all incidents (%). These figures were consistent with the previous years this question has been asked in the survey. Violence and domestic burglary offences were more likely to see the victim offered a VPS compared to all incidents. In over a quarter of violence incidents (28%), victims were offered the opportunity to make a VPS. This proportion had increased from the previous 12 months (from 22% in /). For incidents involving victims of domestic burglary, in just under 1 in 5 incidents were the victims offered a VPS (19%). Proportion of incidents in which victims were given the opportunity by police to make a VPS by offence type 35 3 3 28 23 23 23 21 12 11 12 11 12 9 9 9 9 22 21 12 11 11 19 5 / / / / / Violence Robbery Theft from the person Other theft of personal property Domestic burglary Vehicle-related theft Bicycle theft Criminal damage and arson Base: 53-723 *Data not reported for Robbery offences in /, / and / due to small sample sizes 19

Methodology Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) The CSEW, formerly known as the British Crime Survey (BCS), is a face-to-face survey asking people who are resident in households in England and Wales about their experiences of a range of crimes in the 12 months prior to their interview. The random sample survey interviews both adults and children, though the VPS questions are not included in the survey of children. The survey is conducted on a continuous basis with around 35, households per year. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) announced last year that future funding of the CSEW is to be reduced from October. To account for the reduction in funding the ONS outlined that they will be reducing the CSEW sample size for the / survey year by 6 households, and will reduce the survey response rate to 71% from October. The ONS also committed to keeping questions related to victims use of services and experiences of the court system, though some other question modules are being removed. Statistical Significance Testing Only differences and changes that are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level have been reported in this review. This means that the probability of any given difference happening by chance is low (at most 1 in ). However findings should be treated with some caution owing to the small number of CSEW respondents that were asked questions on Victim Personal Statements. Limitations of the findings This review does not explore more detailed analysis of the data, for example it does not use regression analysis to establish whether there are any particular demographic characteristics or offence attributes that are likely to be driving the differentiation in the VPS offer that we have observed throughout this review. This is due to the format of the data published by the Office for National Statistics that is available for this review. The limitations of the question should also be recognised. The question asks about VPS offered by the police. In some cases, VPS are offered by victim support services funded by Police and Crime Commissioners, which respondents may not associate with the police. It is unclear whether this will have influenced the findings in any way.