Facility Questionnaire PART I (General Information for 3DCRT and IMRT)

Similar documents
IMSURE QA SOFTWARE FAST, PRECISE QA SOFTWARE

Acknowledgments. Ping Xia, Ph.D., UCSF. Pam Akazawa, CMD, UCSF. Cynthia Chuang, Ph.D., UCSF

PCRT 3D. Scalable Architecture System. User-Friendly. Traceable. Continuos Development

THE WIRELESS PHANTOM PERFORM ACCURATE PATIENT QA IN LESS TIME THAN EVER!

FAST, precise. qa software

Quick Reference Datasheet For All RIT113 Packages

ICARO Vienna April Implementing 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT in clinical practice: Recommendations of IAEA- TECDOC-1588

8/2/2017. PerFRACTION from Sun Nuclear Automated Transit Dosimetry for In-Vivo QA

Qalitätssicherung an Multileafkollimatoren. Dr. Lutz Müller Würzburg jan 2004

IMRT and VMAT Patient Specific QA Using 2D and 3D Detector Arrays

TPS COMMISSIONING. Laurence Court University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center 4/3/2017 1

New Technology in Radiation Oncology. James E. Gaiser, Ph.D. DABR Physics and Computer Planning Charlotte, NC

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Clinical Implementation. Outline. Acknowledgement. History of VMAT. IMAT Basics of IMAT

Delta 4 PT. True Volumetric Pre-treatment Verification. The difference is clear

Raising the Bar in IMRT QA

3DVH : SUN NUCLEAR On The Accuracy Of The corporation Planned Dose Perturbation Algorithm Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools *Patent Pending

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

Dynalog data tool for IMRT plan verification

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH. The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

Disclosure. Outline. Acknowledgments. Ping Xia, Ph.D., Page 1. LINAC and MLC QA for IMRT. Received research support from Siemens Medical Solutions

Code of practice: Create a verification plan for OCTAVIUS Detector 729 in Philips Pinnacle³

Advanced Radiotherapy

A DOSIMETRIC MODEL FOR SMALL-FIELD ELECTRON RADIATION THERAPY A CREATIVE PROJECT (3 SEMESTER HOURS) SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL

Commissioning and verification of the collapsed cone convolution superposition algorithm for SBRT delivery using flattening filter-free beams

Feasibility of 3D Printed Patient specific Phantoms for IMRT QA and Other Dosimetric Special Procedures

Tomotherapy Physics. Machine Twinning and Quality Assurance. Emilie Soisson, MS

IAEA-TECDOC-1583 Commissioning of Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Systems: Testing for Typical External Beam Treatment Techniques

Use of Monte Carlo modelling in radiotherapy linac design. David Roberts, PhD Senior Physicist Elekta

7/31/2011. Learning Objective. Video Positioning. 3D Surface Imaging by VisionRT

Automated Image Analysis Software for Quality Assurance of a Radiotherapy CT Simulator

An Investigation of a Model of Percentage Depth Dose for Irregularly Shaped Fields

Calibration and quality assurance for rounded leaf-end MLC systems

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

VMAT for dummies: Concepts, Clinical Implementation and Treatment Planning. Rajat Kudchadker, Ph.D. Associate Professor

Version 3.7. User Manual

Radiation therapy plan checks in a paperless clinic

A secondary monitor unit calculation algorithm using superposition of symmetric, open fields for IMRT plans

Computational modelling and analysis: IOP Medical Physics Group

1. Learn to incorporate QA for surface imaging

The MSKCC Approach to IMRT. Outline

Goals. Scope/exclusions. Outline: follow outline of MPPG (plus rationale & some implementation experiences)

Dosimetric impact of the 160 MLC on head and neck IMRT treatments

3DVH FAQs. What is PDP questions

NEW METHOD OF COLLECTING OUTPUT FACTORS FOR COMMISSIONING LINEAR ACCELERATORS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

Thank-You Members of TG147 TG 147: QA for nonradiographic

IMRT site-specific procedure: Prostate (CHHiP)

Integrated proton-photon treatment planning

Three-dimensional IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID

Dose Calculation and Optimization Algorithms: A Clinical Perspective

Image Guidance and Beam Level Imaging in Digital Linacs

2D DOSE MEASUREMENT USING A FLAT PANEL EPID

Secondary 3D Dose QA Fully Automated using MOSAIQ's IQ Engine. MOSAIQ User Meeting May Antwerp

Indrin Chetty Henry Ford Hospital Detroit, MI. AAPM Annual Meeting Houston 7:30-8:25 Mon 08/07/28 1/30

Implementation of an integrated quality assurance program for CT-TPS process

4 Measurement. and Analysis. 4.1 Overview and Underlying Principles 4-1

Calculation algorithms in radiation therapy treatment planning systems

Hugues Mailleux Medical Physics Department Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille France. Sunday 17 July 2016

Follow this and additional works at:

COMPARISON OF DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS FOR LEKSELL GAMMA KNIFE PERFEXION USING MONTE CARLO VOXEL PHANTOMS

Acceptance Testing and Commissioning of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Systems. Bruce Curran University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, MI

Data. ModuLeaf Mini Multileaf Collimator Precision Beam Shaping for Advanced Radiotherapy

Transitioning from pencil beam to Monte Carlo for electron dose calculations

Introduction. Quality Assurance for Image- Guided Radiation Therapy. Justification for IGRT. Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

A simple method to test geometrical reliability of digital reconstructed radiograph (DRR)

A comparative analysis for verification of IMRT and VMAT treatment plans using a 2-D and 3-D diode array

A software tool for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms

radiotherapy Andrew Godley, Ergun Ahunbay, Cheng Peng, and X. Allen Li NCAAPM Spring Meeting 2010 Madison, WI

Real-time monitoring of linac performance using RT plans and logfiles

Accuracy of cranial coplanar beam therapy with BrainLAB ExacTrac image guidance

Machine and Physics Data Guide

TESTING THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CALCULATION GRIDS ON THE ACCURACY OF INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY PLANS A RESEARCH PAPER (3 SEMESTER HOURS)

Analysis of Radiation Transport through Multileaf Collimators Using BEAMnrc Code

Basics of treatment planning II

RITtrend allows you to effectively manage all your physics QA data in one powerful and customizable package.

An Automated Image-based Method for Multi-Leaf Collimator Positioning Verification in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Modulation factors calculated with an EPID-derived MLC fluence model to streamline IMRT/VMAT second checks

Optical Guidance. Sanford L. Meeks. July 22, 2010

URGENT IMPORTANT FIELD SAFETY NOTIFICATION

Investigation of tilted dose kernels for portal dose prediction in a-si electronic portal imagers

Preface. Med. Phys. 35(9), , Mechanical QA. Radiation Survey Mechanical tests Light radiation Table, Collimator, Gantry Jaws.

Basic Radiation Oncology Physics

Accuracy of treatment planning calculations for conformal radiotherapy van 't Veld, Aart Adeodatus

VALIDATION OF A MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHM FOR CLINICAL ELECTRON BEAMS IN THE PRESENCE OF PHANTOMS WITH COMPLEX HETEROGENEITIES

MRI-LINAC Dynamic Phantom

PARTNER. Grant Agreement Number WP13 - D.1 Report on basic principles for treatment planning software for light ions.

A fluence convolution method to account for respiratory motion in three-dimensional dose calculations of the liver: A Monte Carlo study

Feasibility study of performing IGRT system daily QA using a commercial QA device

Protocol. Technical evaluation of X-ray tomographic image-guided radiotherapy devices CEP10070

A SYSTEM OF DOSIMETRIC CALCULATIONS

URGENT IMPORTANT FIELD SAFETY NOTIFICATION

Table of Contents. About AQUA

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose maps: the matchline effect

Digital Tomosynthesis for Target Localization

Verification of dose calculations with a clinical treatment planning system based on a point kernel dose engine

A Geant4 based treatment plan verification tool: commissioning of the LINAC model and DICOM-RT interface

Mech. Engineering, Comp. Science, and Rad. Oncology Departments. Schools of Engineering and Medicine, Bio-X Program, Stanford University

DOSIMETRY/ RADIATION THERAPY TERMS

PyCMSXiO: an external interface to script treatment plans for the Elekta CMS XiO treatment planning system

Simple quality assurance method of dynamic tumor tracking with the gimbaled linac system using a light field

Transcription:

Facility Questionnaire PART I (General Information for 3DCRT and IMRT) The following items are required before you can enter cases on any RTOG protocol that requires data submission to the Image-Guided Therapy QA Center (ITC). This includes 3DCRT, IMRT or IGRT protocols supported by the ITC. Some of these protocols could require additional information relating to motion management or heterogeneous dose calculations when treating targets in or around the thorax. Additionally, some protocols might require you to complete two or more additional forms. For example, you must complete multiple forms for a protocol that requires or allows IMRT, IGRT and motion management. The additional forms are available through the ITC. If you have completed this or any of the forms for previous credentialing and now wish to enter patients on an protocol requiring digital data submission, please request a copy of your previous application forms from the ITC. You should update any information on these forms that has changed since your earlier credentialing. 1. Submit this completed Facility Questionnaire to: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG Headquarters) RT Quality Assurance Department 1818 Market Street; Suite 1600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Email: rtog-facquest@phila.acr.org Phone: 215-574-3219 FAX: 215-940-8817 2. Contact the ITC (itc@castor.wustl.edu) and request an FTP account for digital data submission 3. Submit and successfully complete any required protocol specific Dry-Run test 4. A successful phantom experiment may also be required depending on the specific protocol requirements Institution Name: RTOG Institution #: If Affiliate, Name of Member Institution: Date Questionnaire Submitted: / / RTF# List the best contact individuals for general question regarding RTOG protocols Physicist: e-mail: Address: Fax: Research Associate: e-mail: Fax: Dosimetrist: e-mail: Fax: Responsible Radiation Oncologist e-mail: Page 1 Facility Questionnaire General Information Version 1: 02 Nov 2007

A. Delivery Resources (TABLE 1) List the treatment units you use for 3DCRT, IMRT or IGRT protocols. (NOTE: If units differ in the type of multileaf collimator or IGRT capabilities, you should list them separately. Please be sure to list all units that will be used with the protocol for which you are credentialing. Also, if you do not intend to credential for IMRT, you can skip the last column.) ID # 1 2 3 Local identifier(s) of unit Vendor Model Photon Energies Used for IMRT Number of identical units MLC or beam modulator (footnote 1) Uses (Check applicable boxes) IMRT Method (see footnote 2) 4 5 FOOTNOTES appear at the top of the next page Page 2 Facility Questionnaire General Information Version 1: 02 Nov 2007

FOOTNOTES 1. Enter the letter from the following list: a. Varian 80 leaf b. Varian Millennium 120 leaf c. Elekta 80 leaf d. Elekta 80 leaf Beam Modulator e. Tomapy Binary Collimator f. NOMOS Binary Collimator g. Seimens 58 leaf h. Siemens 82 leaf i. 3D Line j. Radionics k. BrainLAB 52 leaf l. BrainLAB Tx 120 leaf m. physical compensators n. Cyber Knife using circular collimators o. 2. If you have checked the box for in the last column of the above table, please explain in the space provided above and place additional information here. B. List Protocols (TABLE 2a) If the information listed in Part I of this form is different for various RTOG protocols, enter additional data here. That is, if specific individuals are responsible for particular protocols at your institution, please list them in the table below. Please update earlier information, and add the new protocol you are currently credentialing for at the end. Enter protocol # below Are you credentialing for IMRT, IGRT or both (footnote 1) Radiation Oncologist [List Rad Onc(s) in Table 2b and enter ID #(s) here] Research Associate [List RA(s) in Table 2b and enter ID #(s) here] Physicist [List physicist(s) in Table 2b and enter ID #(s) here] Dosimetrist [List Dosimetrist(s) in Table 2b and enter ID #(s) here] Does treatment in or near the thorax require heterogeneity corrections for this protocol? (footnote 2) Does this protocol require treatment in or near the thorax so that respiration control is required? (footnote 2) From the list of Delivery Resources (Table 1), insert the identification # of the unit(s) that will be used for this protocol. FOOTNOTES 1 enter IMRT, IGRT or IMRT/IGRT 2 enter Yes or No. If Yes, you must complete the Part V questionnaire. Page 3 Facility Questionnaire General Information Version 1: 02 Nov 2007

. List Protocols (TABLE 2b) List personnel here, and enter numbers from the first column in this table in the appropriate location in the table above. The names entered below should be for those individuals routinely involved with the protocol for which you are credentialing. You can enter more than one name per protocol. ID # 1 Name Occupation (check one) e-mail phone Physicist Research Radiation Dosimetrist Associate Oncologist 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Page 4 Facility Questionnaire General Information Version 1: 02 Nov 2007

C. Planning Resources (TABLE 3) List your treatment planning systems here. Skip the last column if you are not credentialing for IMRT I.D. # Vendor Software Version 1 Calculation Algorithm (Enter # from list in Footnote #1 below) Treatment units commissioned for this system (Enter # from Table 1) Is system commissioned for heterogeneity corrections? (Enter yes or no and see Footnote 2) Does the system transfer beams to a phantom for QA? (Enter yes or no. If no, explain the technique you do use for IMRT QA in the blank space below.) 2 3 4 5 7 Footnote 1 (If you are using more than one calculation algorithm for a particular system, enter them separately in different rows of the table above.) 1. BrainLAB pencil beam 2. Corvus pencil beam 3. Helax pencil beam 4. Helax collapsed cone 5. Cadplan pencil beam 6. Eclipse pencil beam 7. Eclipse AAA 8. PLUNK pencil beam 9. MSKCC pencil beam 10. Pinnacle fast convolve 11. Pinnacle collapsed cone or adaptive convolution superposition 12. XiO modified Clarkson or convolution 13. XiO superposition or fast superposition 14. Tomapy convolution superposition 15. Other Footnote 2 If you answered no for the question about the system being commissioned for heterogeneity corrections, please explain? Identify each system using the # in the list. Page 5 Facility Questionnaire General Information Version 1: 02 Nov 2007

D. TREATMENT VERIFICATION Note: If you use IGRT for patient positioning verification for some of your 3DCRT or IMRT treatments, you should complete the Part II questionnaire for IGRT. The RTOG has a very specific definition for IGRT. IGRT is defined here to include only those procedures where an x-ray imaging technique is used in combination with some form of computer-assisted manual or automatic registration with the image information obtained during the patient s planning CT procedure. The standard use of MV EPID images as a visual comparison to DRRs does not fall under this definition. Also, the use of silver halide film radiographs alone is not accepted under this definition of IGRT. Thus, you should use the Part II questionnaire only if you have this type of computer-assisted technology. If you are using standard EPID or radiographic imaging, please answer the relevant question below. Do you use IGRT in your department (see RTOG definition above)? Yes No 1. TREATMENT POSITIONING VERIFICATION FOR 3DCRT or IMRT How do you verify field positioning relative to the patient s anatomy (check all that apply)? port film orthogonal port films BAT ultrasound Other: How often is positioning verification done? first treatment only daily weekly Other: 2. VERIFICATION OF DELIVERED DOSE FOR 3DCRT Describe the method(s) used to conduct a check of the dose and monitor unit calculations generated by the 3DRTP system. Are your 3DCRT treatments monitored by a record and verify system? Manufacturer & Model: 3. VERIFICATION OF DELIVERED DOSE FOR IMRT How do you verify that the treatment unit delivers the planned dose for individual patients? a. Absolute dose point(s) measurement with Page 6 Facility Questionnaire General Information Version 1: 02 Nov 2007

ion chamber (chamber size ) diode TLD radiographic film radiochromic film Other: b. Relative dose isodose distribution with radiographic film radiochromic film Gel dosimetry in (#) axial planes & in (#) sagittal planes & in (#)coronal planes Describe the type of phantom you use for QA: anthropomorphic phantom Vendor: geometric phantom: (material) shape: square cylinder size of phantom cm X cm X cm What agreement between planned and measured doses for individual patients is considered acceptable at your institution? For absolute dose in target volume (high dose) region For absolute dose in critical normal tissue region For absolute dose in low dose region For relative dose in high dose gradient region For relative dose in low dose gradient region in high dose region (target) in low dose region Are your monitor unit calculations checked by an independent program? no yes Vendor: You have completed this form. There are two additional forms you might have to complete. If you answered Yes to the IGRT question at the top of page 6 and you are credentialing for an IGRT protocol, you must complete the Part II Questionnaire for IGRT. If you answered Yes to the questions about motion management or heterogeneity corrections in Table 2a above, you must complete the Part III Questionnaire. Please be sure to complete all necessary forms. If IGRT is optional in the protocol you are credentialing and you do not intend to use this technology, you can simply skip that questionnaire. However, you will not be able to use IGRT in the future until you have completed this requirement. Page 7 Facility Questionnaire General Information Version 1: 02 Nov 2007