Evaluation studies: From controlled to natural settings

Similar documents
Introducing Evaluation

Evaluation studies: From controlled to natural settings

Introducing Evaluation

Evaluation studies: From controlled to natural settings

Introducing Evaluation

Usability Testing. November 14, 2016

Usability Testing. November 9, 2016

Goals of Usability Evaluation

Concepts of Usability. Usability Testing. Usability concept ISO/IS What is context? What is context? What is usability? How to measure it?

03 Usability Engineering

EVALUATION OF PROTOTYPES USABILITY TESTING

Software Development and Usability Testing

Evaluation. Why, What, Where, When to Evaluate Evaluation Types Evaluation Methods

Chapter 11 - Objectives. CSS 225 Database Systems. Chapter 11 Database Analysis and the DreamHome Case Study. Contents. Fact-finding techniques

Interaction Design. Chapter 7 (June 22nd, 2011, 9am-12pm): Evaluation and Testing

8.1 Goals of Evaluation 8.2 Analytic Evaluation 8.3 Empirical Evaluation 8.4 Comparing and Choosing Evaluation Techniques

8.1 Goals of Evaluation 8.2 Analytic Evaluation 8.3 Empirical Evaluation 8.4 Comparing and Choosing Evaluation Techniques

MMI 2. Tutorials. Winter Term 2017/18. LMU München - LFE Medieninformatik. Prof. Andreas Butz Renate Häuslschmid Christina Schneegaß

CPSC 444 Project Milestone III: Prototyping & Experiment Design Feb 6, 2018

Programmiersprache C++ Winter 2005 Operator overloading (48)

ABSTRACT. Keywords: User Satisfaction, User Participation, User Understanding

HCI Research Methods

WAKEFLY WEBSITE USER EXPERIENCE AUDIT

A new interaction evaluation framework for digital libraries

Evaluation Continued. Lecture 7 June 20, 2006

Evaluation and Testing. Andreas Butz, LMU Media Informatics slides partially taken from MMI class

LOW-FI PROTOTYPING. Addison Joanne Katherine SunMi

Age-Related Differences in Subjective Ratings of Hierarchical Information

Overview of Today s Lecture. Analytical Evaluation / Usability Testing. ex: find a book at Amazon.ca via search

MAKING YOUR GATEWAY EASY AND PLEASANT TO USE

Prototyping in Interaction Design

Data Curation Profile Human Genomics

Answer keys for Assignment 16: Principles of data collection

Improving Government Websites and Surveys with Usability Testing

This quiz is closed book, closed notes. You have 80 minutes to complete it. Your name:

CS 315 Intro to Human Computer Interaction (HCI)

REDCap Randomization Module

USABILITY TEST REPORT

[MS10961]: Automating Administration with Windows PowerShell

How to Choose the Right UX Methods For Your Project

A Framework for Source Code metrics

Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio

Preliminary Evidence for Top-down and Bottom-up Processes in Web Search Navigation

Visualisation of ergonomic guidelines

EVALUATION OF PROTOTYPES USABILITY TESTING

Cultural Analysis of Video-Sharing Websites. Why are locally developed South Korean video-sharing sites used instead of

The Process of Interaction Design DECO1200

User Testing & Automated Evaluation. Product Hall of Shame! User Testing & Automated Evaluation. Visual Design Review. Outline. Visual design review

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD. technique of data verification, and data analysis.

CSE 118 Introduction to Design

Usability Tests and Heuristic Reviews Planning and Estimation Worksheets

Usability Evaluation of Cell Phones for Early Adolescent Users

Nektarios Kostaras, Mixalis Xenos. Hellenic Open University, School of Sciences & Technology, Patras, Greece

Introduction What is Usability and Usability Testing?

Safety-enhanced Design EDIS 2014 R (a)(1) Computerized Provider Order Entry

The Effects of Semantic Grouping on Visual Search

Design and User Evaluation of Augmented-Reality Interfaces Topic Usability Evaluation Methods. Payel Bandyopadhyay MSc Student University of Helsinki

NEW BRUNSWICK. IT Systems Administrator

CSCI 3160: User Interface Design

The Process of Interaction Design DECO1200

Effects of Feedback on Eye Typing with a Short Dwell Time

USABILITY EVALUATIONS OF Health Information Technology

How web design manipulations change customers visual perception of a web shop: an eye tracking study.

Foundation Level Syllabus Usability Tester Sample Exam

Usability Testing, Cont.

ACSD Evaluation Methods. and Usability Labs

Usability and User Experience of Case Study Prof. Dr. Wiebke Möhring

Folsom Library & RensSearch Usability Test Plan

Data Management Checklist

Personalised Learning Checklist ( ) SOUND

Orifice Flow Meter

COSC 341 Human Computer Interaction. Dr. Bowen Hui University of British Columbia Okanagan

UCD Method Collection Card-set

A Java-based Course in Human-Computer Interaction. Eileen Kraemer. The University of Georgia. Athens, GA interface.

Integrating Usability Engineering in the Iterative Design Process of the Land Attack Combat System (LACS) Human Computer Interface (HCI)

Citation for published version (APA): Jorritsma, W. (2016). Human-computer interaction in radiology [Groningen]: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

Zornitza Yovcheva Corné van Elzakker Barend Köbben. 3 rd Workshop on Usability of GI Ordnance Survey

CS3724 Human-computer Interaction. Usability Specifications. Copyright 2005 H. Rex Hartson and Deborah Hix.

NAU New Project Submission. Guidance for creating a new project

User Experience in Libraries (as told by cats) Jenny Emanuel Taylor

Experimental Validation of TranScribe Prototype Design

Motivation and Persuasion in Mobile elearning

Descriptions for CIS Classes (Fall 2017)

User-Centered Design. Jeff Bos, Design Insights BlackBerry

The LUCID Design Framework (Logical User Centered Interaction Design)

Course Outline. Department of Computing Science Faculty of Science. COMP 3450 Human Computer Interaction Design (3,1,0) Fall 2015

Human-Computer Interaction

evision Review Project - Engagement Simon McLean, Head of Web & IT Support Information & Data Services.

Usability and Evaluation of BCKOnline PORTAL Prototype Early breast cancer Recurrent Advanced

What is Task Analysis? chapter 15. Task Analysis as a Tool. Goals of Task Analysis. Usage of Task Analysis. Three interacting components

Essential Tools For Finding And Fixing Customer Experience Problems

21 ST CENTURY LEARNING SOLUTIONS

Professor Hausi A. Müller PhD PEng FCAE Department of Computer Science Faculty of Engineering University of Victoria

Kenneth A. Hawick P. D. Coddington H. A. James

First-Time Usability Testing for Bluetooth-Enabled Devices

Human-Computer Interaction

November 9, 2015 Improving Automated Tagging with Implicit Feedback

Using Mobile Devices for Campus Orientation with QR-Codes. Group 11 Jake, Jarrod, Aaron, Tevita

NAU IRBNet Application

IEC/TR : (E)

Transcription:

Chapter 14 Evaluation studies: From controlled to natural settings 1

The aims: Explain how to do usability testing Outline the basics of experimental design Describe how to do field studies 2

1. Usability testing Involves recording performance of typical users doing typical tasks. Controlled settings. Users are observed and timed. Data is recorded on video & key presses are logged. The data is used to calculate performance times, and to identify & explain errors. User satisfaction is evaluated using questionnaires & interviews. Field observations may be used to provide contextual understanding. 3

NB: Experiments & usability testing Experiments test hypotheses to discover new knowledge by investigating the relationship between two or more things i.e., variables. Usability testing is applied experimentation. Developers check that the system is usable by the intended user population for their tasks. Experiments may also be done in usability testing. 4

NB: Usability testing & Usability testing Improve products Few participants Results inform design Usually not completely replicable Conditions controlled as much as possible Procedure planned Results reported to developers research Experiments for research Discover knowledge Many participants Results validated statistically Must be replicable Strongly controlled conditions Experimental design Scientific report to scientific community 5

Usability testing Goals & questions focus on how well users perform tasks with the product. Comparison of products or prototypes common. Focus is on time to complete task & number & type of errors. Data collected by video & interaction logging. Testing is central. User satisfaction questionnaires & interviews provide data about users opinions. 6

Usability lab with observers watching a user & assistant 7

Portable equipment for use in the field 8

9

Mobile head-mounted eye tracker Picture courtesy of SensoMotoric Instruments (SMI), copyright 2010 10

Testing conditions Usability lab or other controlled space. Emphasis on: selecting representative users; developing representative tasks. 5-10 users typically selected. Tasks usually last no more than 30 minutes. The test conditions should be the same for every participant. Informed consent form explains procedures and deals with ethical issues. 11

Some type of data Time to complete a task. Time to complete a task after a specified. time away from the product. Number and type of errors per task. Number of errors per unit of time. Number of navigations to online help or manuals. Number of users making a particular error. Number of users completing task successfully. 12

Usability engineering orientation Aim is improvement with each version. Current level of performance. Minimum acceptable level of performance. Target level of performance. 13

How many participants is enough for user testing? The number is a practical issue. Depends on: schedule for testing; availability of participants; cost of running tests. Typically 5-10 participants. Some experts argue that testing should continue until no new insights are gained. 14

2. Experiments Predict the relationship between two or more variables. Independent variable is manipulated by the researcher. Dependent variable depends on the independent variable. Typical experimental designs have one or two independent variable. Validated statistically & replicable. 15

Experimental designs Different participants - single group of participants is allocated randomly to the experimental conditions. Same participants - all participants appear in both conditions. Matched participants - participants are matched in pairs, e.g., based on expertise, gender, etc. 16

Different, same, matched participant design Design Advantages Disadvantages Different No order effects Many subjects & individual differences a problem Same Matched Few individuals, no individual differences Same as different participants but individual differences reduced Counter-balancing needed because of ordering effects Cannot be sure of perfect matching on all differences 17

3. Field studies Field studies are done in natural settings. in the wild is a term for prototypes being used freely in natural settings. Aim to understand what users do naturally and how technology impacts them. Field studies are used in product design to: - identify opportunities for new technology; - determine design requirements; - decide how best to introduce new technology; - evaluate technology in use. 18

Data collection & analysis Observation & interviews Notes, pictures, recordings Video Logging Analyzes Categorized Categories can be provided by theory Grounded theory Activity theory 19

Data presentation The aim is to show how the products are being appropriated and integrated into their surroundings. Typical presentation forms include: vignettes, excerpts, critical incidents, patterns, and narratives. 20

UbiFit Garden: An in the wild study 21

Key points Usability testing is done in controlled conditions. Usability testing is an adapted form of experimentation. Experiments aim to test hypotheses by manipulating certain variables while keeping others constant. The experimenter controls the independent variable(s) but not the dependent variable(s). There are three types of experimental design: differentparticipants, same- participants, & matched participants. Field studies are done in natural environments. In the wild is a recent term for studies in which a prototype is freely used in a natural setting. Typically observation and interviews are used to collect field studies data. Data is usually presented as anecdotes, excerpts, critical incidents, patterns and narratives. 22