Lorad FFDM QC Procedures for Medical Physicist. Tao Wu, Ph.D. Hologic, Inc.

Similar documents
Unique Features of the GE Senoclaire Tomosynthesis System. Tyler Fisher, M.S., DABR Therapy Physics, Inc.

ACMP 25th Annual Meeting

Certificate Extension II 8/1/2016. Certification Extension Process for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Medical Physicists Role

RECENTLY APPROVED GE FFDM DBT TESTING PROCEDURES.

8/2/2016. Hands-on GE SenoClaire DBT: technical characteristics & quality control. Disclosures and Acknowledgements

Z-MOTION. Universal Digital Radiographic System Z-MOTION. Control-X Medical CONTROL-X MEDICAL

Assessment of 3D performance metrics. X-ray based Volumetric imaging systems: Fourier-based imaging metrics. The MTF in CT

DISC QA Mamchex Tool Use Instructions with CARESTREAM DIRECTVIEW CR Mammography Systems

Scatter reduction for grid-less mammography using the convolutionbased image post-processing technique

Introduction to Biomedical Imaging

S. Guru Prasad, Ph.D., DABR

4/19/2016. Deborah Thames R.T. (R)(M)(QM) Theory & Technology and advancement in 3D imaging DBT

SUMMARY OF DENTAL MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES (Abridged Protocol)

Micro-CT Methodology Hasan Alsaid, PhD

Nicholas Marshall Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

Product data. Mammographic System

Image Quality Assessment and Quality Assurance of Advanced Imaging Systems for IGRT. AAPM Penn-Ohio Chapter Sep 25, 2015 Soyoung Lee, PhD

Acknowledgments and financial disclosure

Fujifilm DR Solution. FDR AcSelerate. The new pinnacle in diagnostic imaging from Fujifilm ISS. CsI. Dynamic Visualization. Technology.

RaySafe Solo. Specifications

Monte Carlo simulation of scatter field for calculation of contrast of discs in synthetic CDMAM images

LAMBDA DATA SHEET. ANALOGIC mammography unit. ANALOGIC mammography unit. Rev. n.05 of 15/01/13

Spiral CT. Protocol Optimization & Quality Assurance. Ge Wang, Ph.D. Department of Radiology University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA

Design Considerations in Optimizing a Breast Tomosynthesis System

CT Protocol Review: Practical Tips for the Imaging Physicist Physicist

Optimisation of Toshiba Aquilion ONE Volume Imaging

10/9/2018. Deborah Thames BSRS RT (R)(M)(QM) Theory & Technology and advancement in 3D imaging DBT

Lucy Phantom MR Grid Evaluation

Philips MicroDose L30

DX-D 100 with WITH ITS EXCELLENT IMAGE QUALITY AND

DX-D 300 FLEXIBLE DIRECT RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM DX-D 300

Digital Scatter Removal in Mammography to enable Patient Dose Reduction

DX-D 100 with wireless detector

COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY CONTROL OF NMR TOMOGRAPHY USING 3D PRINTED PHANTOM

SwissVision TR4000. DICOM Conformance Statement Storage Services. Program Version 9.3 or later Document Revision 1.6.

FLEXIBLE DIRECT RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM DX-D 300

연구용유방초음파질관리 원광대학병원김혜원

The smaller, simpler, safer alternative to radioisotope irradiators. Precision s MultiRad160 is ideal for irradiating larger cell cultures and/or

DX-D 300 FLEXIBLE DIRECT RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM DX-D 300 DR SYSTEM

Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 116: 3D X-Ray Storage SOP Class

DX-D 300. Flexible Direct Radiography System

Photon counting spectral CT versus conventional CT: comparative evaluation for breast imaging application

Hybrid. powered. 20BT lite / 20BT / 40BT. 20 lite / 60. Model mex+20bt lite mex+20bt mex+40bt. Model mex+20 lite mex+20 mex+40 mex+60 mex+100

Effective detective quantum efficiency (edqe) and effective noise equivalent quanta (eneq) for system optimization purposes in digital mammography

CT NOISE POWER SPECTRUM FOR FILTERED BACKPROJECTION AND ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION

DX-D 300. Flexible Direct Radiography System

Quality control phantoms and protocol for a tomography system

Photon beam dose distributions in 2D

ImPACT. Information Leaflet No. 1: CT Scanner Acceptance Testing

iray 1717M2.5 Configuration Introduction

3/27/2012 WHY SPECT / CT? SPECT / CT Basic Principles. Advantages of SPECT. Advantages of CT. Dr John C. Dickson, Principal Physicist UCLH

Experience Boundless Performance

DX-D 100 WITH WIRELESS DETECTOR

Scatter Correction for Dual source Cone beam CT Using the Pre patient Grid. Yingxuan Chen. Graduate Program in Medical Physics Duke University

Financial disclosure. Onboard imaging modality for IGRT

Slide 1. Technical Aspects of Quality Control in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Slide 2. Annual Compliance Testing. of MRI Systems.

Empirical cupping correction: A first-order raw data precorrection for cone-beam computed tomography

Power Spectrum Analysis of an Anthropomorphic Breast Phantom Compared to Patient Data in 2D Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis

Philips SPECT/CT Systems

Mammographic QC Kit Gammex 182B Routine Mammography QC Kit Gammex Processor QC Kit Gammex 185C... 13

Automated Image Analysis Software for Quality Assurance of a Radiotherapy CT Simulator

DX-D WITH DX-D 40/45 DETECTOR FAMILY MOBILE DR SOLUTION

Fluoroscan InSight V5.0.6 DICOM Conformance Statement

CLASS HOURS: 4 CREDIT HOURS: 4 LABORATORY HOURS: 0

Medical X-ray Imaging

Medical X-ray Imaging

Corso di laurea in Fisica A.A Fisica Medica 4 TC

Design and performance characteristics of a Cone Beam CT system for Leksell Gamma Knife Icon

Radiology. Marta Anguiano Millán. Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad de Granada

O-ARM IMAGING SYSTEM TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION GUIDE

Future Topics. Projection Imaging Dose Reporting, XA 3D Volume Objects. for DICOM WG-02. Presented by Heinz Blendinger, Siemens Medical Solutions

CT vs. VolumeScope: image quality and dose comparison

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING QA & PATIENT ALIGNMENT

product data Raybow dr mobile digital radiographic system with wireless detector product data

A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis

Scattered radiation in DBT geometries with flexible breast compression paddles: A Monte Carlo simulation study

Detailed analysis of scatter contribution from different simulated geometries of X-ray detectors

Design and development of a phantom for tomosynthesis with potential for automated analysis via the cloud

Ch. 4 Physical Principles of CT

Measurement of Skin Dose

Equipment Specification

Advanced Instrument Development, Inc Curtiss St. Downers Grove, IL U.S.A. Phone: (630) Fax: (630)

RAD. Experiences Using the Wireless FPD-Equipped MobileDaRt Evolution and Its Usefulness. 1. Introduction

REGIUS CONSOLE CS-2. Revision History. Date Version Description 02/08/2004 Ver This Conformance Statement applies to DICOM3.0 (2000 version).

Shadow casting. What is the problem? Cone Beam Computed Tomography THE OBJECTIVES OF DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IDEAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING STUDY LIMITATIONS

Optimization of CT Simulation Imaging. Ingrid Reiser Dept. of Radiology The University of Chicago

Background. Outline. Radiographic Tomosynthesis: Image Quality and Artifacts Reduction 1 / GE /

MAMMOMAT 1000 / 3000 Nova. Accessories. Accessories (optional) Compression plate with low edge 18 cm x 24 cm #

VXvue User Manual (For Human Use)

8/2/2016. Measures the degradation/distortion of the acquired image (relative to an ideal image) using a quantitative figure-of-merit

Fits you like no other

Chapter 1 General Information

Simulation of Mammograms & Tomosynthesis imaging with Cone Beam Breast CT images

Background 8/2/2011. Development of Breast Models for Use in Simulation of Breast Tomosynthesis and CT Breast Imaging. Stephen J.

Detector Noise evaluation by means of Continue Wavelet Transform. Comparison with Fourier Transform methods

AIDR 3D Iterative Reconstruction:

Simulation Based POD Estimation for Radiographic Testing of Turbine Blades

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Fundamentals

Ultra KDR NewCo Arm Installation Guide

Transcription:

Lorad FFDM QC Procedures for Medical Physicist Tao Wu, Ph.D. Hologic, Inc.

Lorad Selenia FFDM

Tests Following Lorad QC Manual Collimation Assessment Artifact Evaluation System Resolution Phantom Image Quality Evaluation Automatic Exposure Control Function Performance Automatic Exposure Control Reproducibility Signal-To-Noise and Contrast-To-Noise Measurements Softcopy Workstation QC

Acquisition Workstation Software

OS Login Medical Physicist username: phys password: phys

Detector Warm-Up After logging in OS, a dialog showing detector warm-up status appears If the system has been running - Dismiss If the system has been shut down - Wait for 30-40 min (or dismiss it and start with tests in which detector is not involved, e.g. HVL, tube output)

Application Login Username:Andrea Password: Andrea

Turn Off Auto-decompression

Send Images to Output Devices

Send Images to Output Devices

Send Images to Output Devices

Non-Imaging Mode

Create a New Patient Account Select No Output

Create a New Patient Account

Create a New Patient Account

Selenia QC Tests

Tests Following Lorad QC Manual Collimation Assessment Artifact Evaluation System Resolution Phantom Image Quality Evaluation Automatic Exposure Control Function Performance Signal-To-Noise and Contrast-To-Noise Measurements Softcopy Workstation QC

Order of Testing Artifact Evaluation Phantom Image Quality Evaluation SNR and CNR Measurements AEC Function Performance Other Tests

Artifact Evaluation Evaluation of detector, x-ray tube, filter etc 4 cm thick acrylic block No compression paddle Four flat field images Mo/Mo, contact mode, LFS with grid Mo/Rh, contact mode, LFS with grid Mo/Mo, mag mode, SFS without grid Mo/Rh, mag mode, SFS without grid Review the images on acquisition workstation monitor Window width = 500, Level = 350

Artifact Evaluation

Artifact Evaluation

Evaluation of Printer Artifact Evaluation Select a computer-generated flat-field image Print the image and evaluate it Repeat the test for each printer If a printer is connected to multiple Selenia systems, it only needs to be tested once from one Selenia.

Artifact Evaluation

Phantom Image Quality Evaluation ACR phantom with acrylic disc AEC position 2 Print film Measure film densities - Background density > 1.20, with control limit ± 0.20 - Density difference over the acrylic disk > 0.40, with control limit ± 0.05 Phantom scoring (hard copy and softcopy station) 5 fibers, 4 speck groups, 4 masses

Phantom Image Quality Evaluation

SNR and CNR Measurements

SNR and CNR Measurements SNR 40 Establish the reference CNR value during the acceptance test CNR should stay within ±15% of the reference

Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) AEC modes Auto-Filter: Auto-kV: Auto-Time: filter, kvp, mas all automatically determined filter manually selected kvp and mas automatically determined filter and kvp manual selected mas automatically determined AEC Method - Filter and kvp are determined by breast thickness (in Auto- Filter and Auto-kV modes) - A pre-exposure is used to determine mas AEC positions Auto-AEC (The densest tissue gets enough exposure) Seven manual positions (marked on compression paddle)

AEC Function Performance 1. Performance at different thickness and imaging modes 2. Performance at different compensation levels

AEC Function Performance 1. Performance at different thickness and imaging modes Acrylic or BR-12 blocks AEC position 2 Contact mode (LFS, grid): 2, 4, 6, 8 cm phantom Mag mode (SFS, no grid): 4 cm phantom Variation of target pixel values 10% of the mean target pixel value

AEC Function Performance

AEC Function Performance 2. Performance at different compensation levels 4 cm acrylic or BR-12 Compensation levels: Step -5 to Step +5 Use average target count at Step 0 as reference Compare target count at other steps to the reference Step -5 0.23 0.28 Step -4 0.36 0.44 Step -3 0.50 0.61 Step -2 0.63 0.77 Step -1 0.77 0.94 Step +1 1.04 1.27 Step +2 1.17 1.43 Step +3 1.31 1.60 Step +4 1.44 1.76 Step +5 1.58 1.93

Collimation Assessment 1. X-Ray Field to Light Field 2. X-Ray Field to Image Receptor 3. Compression Paddle to Image Receptor

Collimation Assessment One test for 24 29 cm imaging mode Three tests for 18 24 cm imaging modes Left imaging position Center imaging position Right imaging position L M R

Collimation Assessment Use coin method as described in ACR manual

Collimation Assessment 1. X-Ray Field to Light Field Measure deviations between the edges of the light field (exterior edge of the coin) and the x- ray field at al four sides Sum of the magnitude of deviations on opposite sides 2% of the SID SID = 66 cm 2% of the SID = 1.32 cm

Collimation Assessment 2. X-Ray Field to Image Receptor d 1 : measured on film distance from the inner edge of the coin to the edge of the x-ray field d 2 : measured on digital image distance from the inner edge of the coin to the edge of the detector (d 1 1.06 ) - d 2 The x-ray field shall extend beyond the chest wall side of the image receptor The x-ray field must NOT extend >2% of the SID at any of the four sides of the image receptor

Collimation Assessment 3. Compression Paddle to Image Receptor Measure distance from the outer edge of the coin to the edge of the image The anterior edge of the compression paddle must be aligned just beyond the chest wall edge of the image receptor, but 1% of the SID

Collimation Assessment

Collimation Assessment

Collimation Assessment

Evaluation of System Resolution Line pair phantom 4 cm acrylic block Line pair phantom placed at 45º to the detector row

Evaluation of System Resolution Limiting spatial resolution 7 c/mm (lp/mm)

Detector Ghosting (Optional) 1. Create ghosting effect 2. Quantify ghosting effect

Detector Ghosting (Optional) 1. Create ghosting effect Ghosting area

Detector Ghosting (Optional) 2. Quantify ghosting effect Ghosting area

Detector Ghosting (Optional) 2. Quantify ghosting effect Ghosting factor 0.3 ROI 1 in background without ghosting Ghosting Factor = ROI 2 in Al filter without ghosting mean region2 -mean region3 mean region1 -mean region2 ROI 3 in Al filter with ghosting

Thank you! Tao Wu twu@hologic.com Tel: 203-207-4574