Digital Raster Acquisition Project Eastern Ontario (DRAPE) 2014 Digital Surface Model and Digital Terrain Model

Similar documents
User Guide for. Bathymetry. LIO Data Classes

High Resolution Digital Elevation Model (HRDEM) CanElevation Series Product Specifications. Edition

Lecture 4: Digital Elevation Models

Alaska Department of Transportation Roads to Resources Project LiDAR & Imagery Quality Assurance Report Juneau Access South Corridor

NEXTMap World 10 Digital Elevation Model

Municipal Projects in Cambridge Using a LiDAR Dataset. NEURISA Day 2012 Sturbridge, MA

Alberta-wide ALOS DSM "ALOS_DSM15.tif", "ALOS_DSM15_c6.tif"

[Youn *, 5(11): November 2018] ISSN DOI /zenodo Impact Factor

An Introduction to Lidar & Forestry May 2013

Assimilation of Break line and LiDAR Data within ESRI s Terrain Data Structure (TDS) for creating a Multi-Resolution Terrain Model

Automated Feature Extraction from Aerial Imagery for Forestry Projects

VALIDATION OF A NEW 30 METER GROUND SAMPLED GLOBAL DEM USING ICESAT LIDARA ELEVATION REFERENCE DATA

LiDAR QA/QC - Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment report -

Data Acquisition Through the Geospatial Products and Services Contract (GPSC)

Technical Considerations and Best Practices in Imagery and LiDAR Project Procurement

NEXTMap World 30 Digital Surface Model

N.J.P.L.S. An Introduction to LiDAR Concepts and Applications

Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Design. Photogrammetric Mapping Specifications

2. POINT CLOUD DATA PROCESSING

Terrain Modeling and Mapping for Telecom Network Installation Using Scanning Technology. Maziana Muhamad

LIDAR MAPPING FACT SHEET

APPENDIX E2. Vernal Pool Watershed Mapping

LIDAR and Terrain Models: In 3D!

LiDAR Data Processing:

A Method to Create a Single Photon LiDAR based Hydro-flattened DEM

GSD-Elevation data, Grid 2+

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)

Lidar and GIS: Applications and Examples. Dan Hedges Clayton Crawford

Central Coast LIDAR Project, 2011 Delivery 1 QC Analysis LIDAR QC Report February 17 th, 2012

Compatibility Matrix. Good Control and Good Proxy. June 4, 2018

TrueOrtho with 3D Feature Extraction

Lidar Technical Report

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA

Sandy River, OR Bathymetric Lidar Project, 2012 Delivery QC Analysis Lidar QC Report March 26 th, 2013

Esri International User Conference. July San Diego Convention Center. Lidar Solutions. Clayton Crawford

Hamilton County Enhances GIS Base Mapping with 1-foot Contours

Overview. 1. Aerial LiDAR in Wisconsin (20 minutes) 2. Demonstration of data in CAD (30 minutes) 3. High Density LiDAR (20 minutes)

2010 LiDAR Project. GIS User Group Meeting June 30, 2010

Files Used in this Tutorial

CLASSIFICATION OF NONPHOTOGRAPHIC REMOTE SENSORS

Release Notes. BlackBerry Enterprise Identity

Rogue River LIDAR Project, 2012 Delivery 1 QC Analysis LIDAR QC Report September 6 th, 2012

MODULE 1 BASIC LIDAR TECHNIQUES

Release Notes. BlackBerry UEM Client for Android Version

PROJECT REPORT. Allegany County Acquisition and Classification for FEMA Region 3 FY 12 VA LiDAR. USGS Contract: G12PD00040.

CO-REGISTERING AND NORMALIZING STEREO-BASED ELEVATION DATA TO SUPPORT BUILDING DETECTION IN VHR IMAGES

Lidar Standards. Chatham County, Georgia. Jason Lee, Noel Perkins and Vincent Grevemberg

BlackBerry Enterprise Server for Microsoft Office 365. Version: 1.0 Maintenance Release: 1. Release Notes

BlackBerry Enterprise Service 10. September 10, 2014 Version: 10 and 10.1.x. Compatibility Matrix

CREATING CUSTOMIZED SPATIAL MODELS WITH POINT CLOUDS USING SPATIAL MODELER OPERATORS TO PROCESS POINT CLOUDS IN IMAGINE 2014

Tutorial (Intermediate level): Dense Cloud Classification and DTM generation with Agisoft PhotoScan Pro 1.1

Should Contours Be Generated from Lidar Data, and Are Breaklines Required? Lidar data provides the most

Quick Start Guide. BlackBerry Workspaces app for Android. Version 5.0

2-4 April 2019 Taets Art and Event Park, Amsterdam CLICK TO KNOW MORE

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR. ORTHOPHOTO & LiDAR AOT

MODELLING FOREST CANOPY USING AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA

BLM Fire Project, 2013 QC Analysis Lidar and Orthophoto QC Report November 25th, 2013

BlackBerry Enterprise Server Express for Microsoft Exchange

High resolution survey and orthophoto project of the Dosso-Gaya region in the Republic of Niger. by Tim Leary, Woolpert Inc.

Merging LiDAR Data with Softcopy Photogrammetry Data

A SENSOR FUSION APPROACH TO COASTAL MAPPING

BlackBerry Enterprise Server for Novell GroupWise. Compatibility Matrix June 26, 2012

MassCEC Rooftop Solar Map

User Guide. BlackBerry Docs To Go for Android. Version 1.3.0

Airborne LiDAR Data Acquisition for Forestry Applications. Mischa Hey WSI (Corvallis, OR)

An Introduction to Using Lidar with ArcGIS and 3D Analyst

Contents of Lecture. Surface (Terrain) Data Models. Terrain Surface Representation. Sampling in Surface Model DEM

Adrian Cosmin Ghimbaşan 1 Cornel Cristian Tereşneu 1 Iosif Vorovencii 1

Introduction to LiDAR

Image Services for Elevation Data

Airborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR

Digital Elevation Models

Compatibility Matrix. BlackBerry UEM. March 26, 2018

Workshops funded by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund

Wednesday, July 15, Author: Eldris Ferrer Gonzalez, M.Sc. Engineering CSA Group

Files Used in this Tutorial

Visualizing 2D Data in a 3D World

Reality Check: Processing LiDAR Data. A story of data, more data and some more data

Windstorm Simulation & Modeling Project

COMPUTING SOLAR ENERGY POTENTIAL OF URBAN AREAS USING AIRBORNE LIDAR AND ORTHOIMAGERY

A COMPARISON OF LIDAR TERRAIN DATA WITH AUTOCORRELATED DSM EXTRACTED FROM DIGITALLY ACQUIRED HIGH OVERLAP PHOTOGRAPHY BACKGROUND

Creating raster DEMs and DSMs from large lidar point collections. Summary. Coming up with a plan. Using the Point To Raster geoprocessing tool

POSITIONING A PIXEL IN A COORDINATE SYSTEM

BlackBerry Enterprise Server Express for IBM Lotus Domino. Compatibility Matrix. September 20, 2012

Installation and Configuration Guide

Final Report for the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority 2010 Update to 1m Contour Supporting Digital Terrain Model for Niagara Watershed

3D Elevation Program- Status and Updates. Claire DeVaughan South Central Arc User Group Conference April 11, 2018

UTILIZACIÓN DE DATOS LIDAR Y SU INTEGRACIÓN CON SISTEMAS DE INFORMACIÓN GEOGRÁFICA

SimActive and PhaseOne Workflow case study. By François Riendeau and Dr. Yuri Raizman Revision 1.0

Lecture 23 - LiDAR. GEOL 452/552 - GIS for Geoscientists I. Scanning Lidar. 30 m DEM. Lidar representations:

Improvement of the Edge-based Morphological (EM) method for lidar data filtering

3D Elevation Program GeoCue Webinar April 29, The National Map

Harnessing GIS and Imagery for Power Transmission Inspection. ESRI European Users Conference October 15, 2015

FILTERING OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS

Tree height measurements and tree growth estimation in a mire environment using digital surface models

Digital Elevation Models (DEM)

Entrust WAP Server Certificate Relying Party Agreement

Burns, OR LIDAR Project, 2011 Delivery QC Analysis LIDAR QC Report February 13th, 2012

Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)

LiDAR Derived Contours

Transcription:

Digital Raster Acquisition Project Eastern Ontario (DRAPE) 2014 Digital Surface Model and Digital Terrain Model User Guide Provincial Mapping Unit Mapping and Information Resources Branch Corporate Management and Information Division Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2017-01-27

Disclaimer This technical documentation has been prepared by Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (the Ministry ). No warranties or representations, express or implied, statutory or otherwise shall apply or are being made by the Ministry with respect to the documentation, its accuracy or its completeness. In no event will the Ministry be liable or responsible for any lost profits, loss of revenue or earnings, claims by third parties or for any economic, indirect, special, incidental, consequential or exemplary damage resulting from any errors, inaccuracies or omissions in this documentation; and in no event will the Ministry s liability for any such errors, inaccuracies or omissions on any particular claim, proceeding or action, exceed the actual consideration paid by the claimant involved to the Ministry for the materials to which this instructional documentation relates. Save and except for the liability expressly provided for above, the Ministry shall have no obligation, duty or liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise, including any liability or negligence. The limitations, exclusions and disclaimers expressed above shall apply irrespective of the nature of any cause of action, demand or action, including but not limited to breach of contract, negligence, strict liability, tort or any other legal theory, and shall survive any fundamental breach or breaches. Cette publication spécialisée n est disponible qu en anglais. Additional Information For more information about this document, please contact Provincial Mapping Unit at pmu@ontario.ca.

Executive Summary Key Words Digital Raster Acquisition Project Eastern Ontario, Digital Elevation Model, Digital Surface Model, Digital Terrain Model, Elevation, Orthoimagery, Orthophoto, Imagery and Aerial Photography. Abstract The DRAPE 2014 DSM and DTM are 2 metre raster elevation products that were generated from the DRAPE 2014 Classified LAS. These products were generated inhouse by Mapping and Geomatics Services Section (MGSS) staff in a continuing effort to improve surface and ground elevation products.

Table of Contents Disclaimer... 2 Additional Information... 2 Executive Summary... 3 Key Words... 3 Abstract... 3 Table of Contents... 4 List of Figures... 5 List of Acronyms... 6 List of Definitions... 7 Mass Points... 7 Digital Elevation Model (DEM)... 7 Digital Terrain Model (DTM)... 7 Digital Surface Model (DSM)... 8 1. Product Description... 9 1.1 Acquisition... 9 1.2 Geographic Extent... 9 1.3 Reference System... 10 1.3.1 Horizontal Reference System... 10 1.3.2 Vertical Reference System... 10 1.4 Vertical Accuracy Assessment... 10 1.5 Spatial Resolution... 10 2. Product Details... 11 2.1 Classified LAS, DSM and DTM... 12 2.1.1 Classified LAS... 12 2.1.2 DSM... 13 2.1.3 DTM... 13 2.2 Data Delivery Format... 14 2.3 Use Restrictions... 15

List of Figures Figure 1: DRAPE 2014 DSM and DTM Tiles... 9 Figure 2: DRAPE Products... 12 Figure 3: Nine Downloadable Packages... 14

List of Acronyms CGVD: Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum DEM: Digital Elevation Model DRAPE: Digital Raster Acquisition Project Eastern Ontario DSM: Digital Surface Model DTM: Digital Terrain Model IfSAR: Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar LiDAR: Light Detection and Ranging LIO: Land Information Ontario MNRF: Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry MGSS: Mapping and Geomatics Services Section NAD: North American Datum NVA: Non-Vegetated Accuracy PMU: Provincial Mapping Unit RMSEz: Root Mean Square Error in Z TIN: Triangular Irregular Networks UTM: Universal Transverse Mercator VVA: Vegetated Vertical Accuracy

List of Definitions Mass Points Mass points are irregularly spaced points, each with x/y location coordinates and z- values, typically (but not always) used to form a TIN. When generated manually, mass points are ideally chosen to depict the most significant variations in the slope or aspect of TIN triangles. However, when generated automatically, e.g., by LiDAR or IfSAR scanner, mass point spacing and patterns depend upon the characteristics of the technologies used to acquire the data. Digital Elevation Model (DEM) DEM is a generic term for digital topographic and/or bathymetric data that is comprised of x/y coordinates and z-values to represent an elevation surface. The term DTM and DSM should be used over the term DEM to more specifically reference bare-earth or surface elevation model products when possible. The term DEM is to be used as a broader term when referencing a generic elevation data product. The Provincial DEM is an example of a generic elevation product given that it has been constructed using a combination of both DTM and DSM elevation datasets to achieve Provincial coverage. Digital Terrain Model (DTM) The bare earth surface (lowest surface, last reflective surface, or LiDAR last-return) represents the surface of the "bare-earth" terrain, after removal of vegetation and constructed features. Photogrammetry has traditionally generated DTMs when elevations are generated by manual compilation techniques. Unless specified to the contrary, the bare-earth surface includes the top surface of water bodies, rather than the submerged surface of underwater terrain.

Similar to a DSM, a DTM can be structured either as a vector dataset (comprised of mass points and optionally 3D breaklines) to model bare-earth elevations or a raster dataset that is interpolated from the vector elevation data to model bare-earth terrain elevations. Using modern elevation point cloud classification algorithms and file formats, such as LAS, a DTM can represent a mass point dataset that has been classified for bare-earth terrain elevations. Digital Surface Model (DSM) A DSM is the highest reflective surface of ground features captured by the sensor. This surface may also be referred to as the first reflective surface or LIDAR first-return. The DSM may include treetops, rooftops, and tops of towers, telephone poles, and other natural or manmade features; or it may include the ground surface if there is no vegetative ground cover. Photogrammetry, IFSAR, LIDAR and sonar can all provide this type of surface, yet characteristics such as accuracy and degree of detail (ability to resolve desired surface features) may vary significantly across technologies and even within the same technology. With sonar, the DSM may include sunken vessels and other artifacts, whereas the bathymetric surface reflects the natural underwater terrain. Similarly, with photogrammetry, LIDAR, and IFSAR the reflective surface may include any artifact present when the sensor mapped the area, including passing cars and trucks and similar features not normally considered to be part of a digital terrain model. Similar to a DTM, a DSM can be structured either as a vector dataset (comprised of mass points and optionally 3D breaklines) to model surface elevations or a raster dataset that is interpolated from the vector elevation data to model surface elevations. Using modern elevation point cloud classification algorithms and file formats, such as LAS, a DSM can represent a mass point dataset that has been classified for surface elevation features.

1. Product Description 1.1 Acquisition DRAPE 2014 digital imagery was collected for areas in Eastern Ontario between April 28th and June 7th 2014 in leaf off conditions. It was a collaborative funding partnership that involved municipalities, Conservation Authorities, the Province of Ontario, selected Federal Departments as well as private sector organizations. In total, there were more than 60 funding partners involved in DRAPE. 1.2 Geographic Extent The DRAPE 2014 DSM and DTM products contain approximately 37,226 tiles (1km x 1km) each (see Figure 1). The DSM and DTM products encompass an area of approximately 37,290 square kilometers. Figure 1: DRAPE 2014 DSM and DTM Tiles

1.3 Reference System 1.3.1 Horizontal Reference System The horizontal coordinate system of the DSM and DTM are Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 18. The horizontal datum is North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83CSRS). The horizontal unit of measure (coordinate system axis units) for all raster grid cells is metres (m). 1.3.2 Vertical Reference System The vertical coordinate system is based on the Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum 1928 (CGVD28) of the Geodetic Survey Division, and is measured in metres above mean sea level. For more information please see the Geodetic Survey Division of Natural Resources Canada (http://webapp.geod.nrcan.gc.ca/geod/). The vertical unit of measure (coordinate system axis units) for all raster grid cells is metres (m). One single vertical elevation value represents each raster grid cell. 1.4 Vertical Accuracy Assessment An assessment has been conducted to evaluate the vertical accuracy of SCOOP 2013 Digital Surface Model (DSM) and SCOOP 2013 Digital Terrain Model (DTM). To date, there has not been an assessment done specific to the DRAPE but the SCOOP and DRAPE products share many similarities. The results of the SCOOP assessments including the data can be downloaded on the metadata record of either of the SCOOP products. 1.5 Spatial Resolution The grid spacing is based on Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection with a raster cell resolution of 2 metres. This projection and resolution will match the DEM product. The rasters will be snapped together and share a common origin and resolution.

2. Product Details The DRAPE 2014 Classified LAS was created using two products; DRAPE 2014 Raw LAS and DRAPE 2014 DEM. The Raw LAS was generated by the imagery contractor from the stereo photography using XPro SGM. The DEM was created using a proprietary steam rolling algorithm to reduce raised surface features in the Raw LAS dataset. It is important to note that DEM does not represent a full bare-earth elevation surface since it was created for the sole purpose of orthorectification of the imagery. While the steam-rolling algorithm has allowed for some raised features to be reduced closer to bare-earth elevations (e.g. small buildings, small blocks of forest cover), many features are still raised above ground surface, such as larger buildings, larger forest stands and other raised features. The DSM and DTM were then created by MGSS staff using the Classified LAS. The derived products (Classified LAS, DSM and DTM) are a result of a completely automated process. These products are not intended to be a definitive final product to support all types of business needs. It is intended to assist users in further refinement of the elevation. Here is a list of known issues: The water contains a lot of noise and is not flat or flowing downstream. The pixel correlated elevation (raw LAS) was unable to penetrate dense canopy and therefore there is a lack of points to truly represent the surface in canopy. There are many erroneous points that have not been classified properly. These points will be represented in the DSM or DTM as either a pit or a spike.

2.1 Classified LAS, DSM and DTM After releasing the DRAPE 2014 DEM and the DRAPE 2014 Raw LAS, MGSS staff worked with the raw point cloud LAS data to create a Classified LAS, Digital Surface Model (DSM) and a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) as seen in Figure 2. Figure 2: DRAPE Products 2.1.1 Classified LAS The raw point cloud from the overlapping flight lines were resampled to 50cm and retiled into 1km by 1km tiles and reassembled back into LAS format. This reduces redundant points as well as reducing the number of points. During the retiling, a comparison with the DRAPE 2014 DEM was done to automatically assign the LAS classification. If the DEM was within 50cm vertically, it was assigned a LAS code of 2 (ground) otherwise it was a LAS code of 0 (unassigned).

2.1.2 DSM The DSM raster was created by the using all the points (ground and unclassified) from the Classified LAS to create a raster product. This is a 2m resolution product matching the same tiling and resolution as the DEM. In the production of this raster, the adjacent 8 tiles are also used to prevent any edge effects. 2.1.3 DTM The DTM raster is produce from only the ground classified points, then compared with the DSM to ensure that no DTM point would be higher than the DSM.

2.2 Data Delivery Format DRAPE 2014 DSM and DTM is currently stored and distributed through Land Information Ontario (LIO) Metadata Tool (https://www.javacoeapp.lrc.gov.on.ca/geonetwork/srv/en/main.home). Both DRAPE 2014 DSM and DTM products can be downloaded in nine packages (see figure 3). Each package contains multiple tiles in image format (.IMG). Figure 3: Nine Downloadable Packages

2.3 Use Restrictions The DRAPE 2014 DSM and DTM are both considered Open Data. You are free to copy, modify, publish, translate, adapt, distribute or otherwise use the Information in any medium, mode or format for any lawful purpose. If you do any of the above you must use the following attribution statement Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence Ontario.

Version 1516.1