Iterative Servers The course that gives CMU its Zip! Iterative servers process one request at a time. Concurrent Servers

Similar documents
Concurrent Servers Dec 2, 2009"

Three Basic Mechanisms for Creating Concurrent Flows. Systemprogrammering 2009 Föreläsning 10 Concurrent Servers. Process-Based Concurrent Server

call connect call read call connect ret connect call fgets Client 2 blocks waiting to complete its connection request until after lunch!

Concurrent Programming April 21, 2005

Concurrent Programming November 28, 2007

Concurrent Programming. Jin-Soo Kim Computer Systems Laboratory Sungkyunkwan University

Computer Systems Laboratory Sungkyunkwan University

Concurrent Programming

Concurrent Programming is Hard! Concurrent Programming. Reminder: Iterative Echo Server. The human mind tends to be sequential

Lecture #23 Concurrent Programming

Carnegie Mellon. Bryant and O Hallaron, Computer Systems: A Programmer s Perspective, Third Edition

Concurrent Programming

CONCURRENT PROGRAMMING. Lecture 5

Concurrent Programming

Concurrent Programming

Concurrent Programming

CONCURRENCY MODEL. UNIX Programming 2014 Fall by Euiseong Seo

Concurrent Programming

Total Score is updated. The score of PA4 will be changed! Please check it. Will be changed

Concurrent programming

Concurrent Programming

Concurrent Programming

Approaches to Concurrency

Concurrent Programming

Announcement (1) Due date for PA3 is changed (~ next week) PA4 will also be started in the next class. Not submitted. Not scored

The course that gives CMU its Zip! Concurrency I: Threads April 10, 2001

Concurrent Programming

Proxy: Concurrency & Caches

Network Programming September 6, 2005

Concurrency. Alan L. Cox Some slides adapted from CMU slides

Threading Language and Support. CS528 Multithreading: Programming with Threads. Programming with Threads

I/O Models. Kartik Gopalan

Carnegie Mellon Performance of Mul.threaded Code

CS 475. Process = Address space + one thread of control Concurrent program = multiple threads of control

Network Programming November 3, 2008

Today. Threads review Sharing Mutual exclusion Semaphores

Threads. CS 475, Spring 2018 Concurrent & Distributed Systems

CISC2200 Threads Spring 2015

POSIX threads CS 241. February 17, Copyright University of Illinois CS 241 Staff

CMPSC 311- Introduction to Systems Programming Module: Concurrency

CMPSC 311- Introduction to Systems Programming Module: Concurrency

CMPSC 311- Introduction to Systems Programming Module: Concurrency

Internetworking II: Network programming. April 20, 2000

CS510 Operating System Foundations. Jonathan Walpole

Outline. CS4254 Computer Network Architecture and Programming. Introduction 2/4. Introduction 1/4. Dr. Ayman A. Abdel-Hamid.

Threads. Jo, Heeseung

Carnegie Mellon. Bryant and O Hallaron, Computer Systems: A Programmer s Perspective, Third Edition

Recitation 14: Proxy Lab Part 2

CS 5523 Operating Systems: Midterm II - reivew Instructor: Dr. Tongping Liu Department Computer Science The University of Texas at San Antonio

Internet protocol stack. Internetworking II: Network programming. April 20, UDP vs TCP. Berkeley Sockets Interface.

CS333 Intro to Operating Systems. Jonathan Walpole

Threads. What is a thread? Motivation. Single and Multithreaded Processes. Benefits

Synchronization: Basics

CS 3305 Intro to Threads. Lecture 6

Overview. Administrative. * HW 2 Grades. * HW 3 Due. Topics: * What are Threads? * Motivating Example : Async. Read() * POSIX Threads

CS 5523 Operating Systems: Thread and Implementation

CS 333 Introduction to Operating Systems. Class 3 Threads & Concurrency. Jonathan Walpole Computer Science Portland State University

Any of the descriptors in the set {1, 4} have an exception condition pending

Threads (SGG 4) Outline. Traditional Process: Single Activity. Example: A Text Editor with Multi-Activity. Instructor: Dr.

CS 333 Introduction to Operating Systems. Class 3 Threads & Concurrency. Jonathan Walpole Computer Science Portland State University

CS Operating Systems: Threads (SGG 4)

CSC209H Lecture 10. Dan Zingaro. March 18, 2015

Εργαστήριο 9 I/O Multiplexing

CPSC 341 OS & Networks. Threads. Dr. Yingwu Zhu

Client-server model The course that gives CMU its Zip! Network programming Nov 27, Using ports to identify services.

Introduction to PThreads and Basic Synchronization

pthreads CS449 Fall 2017

Thread. Disclaimer: some slides are adopted from the book authors slides with permission 1

CS24: INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTING SYSTEMS. Spring 2018 Lecture 20

THREADS. Jo, Heeseung

CS 3723 Operating Systems: Final Review

CSE 306/506 Operating Systems Threads. YoungMin Kwon

Recitation 14: Proxy Lab Part 2

CSC209: Software tools. Unix files and directories permissions utilities/commands Shell programming quoting wild cards files

CSC209: Software tools. Unix files and directories permissions utilities/commands Shell programming quoting wild cards files. Compiler vs.

CS370 Operating Systems

Last class: Today: Thread Background. Thread Systems

CS510 Operating System Foundations. Jonathan Walpole

Processes, Threads, SMP, and Microkernels

pthreads Announcement Reminder: SMP1 due today Reminder: Please keep up with the reading assignments (see class webpage)

NETWORK AND SYSTEM PROGRAMMING. I/O Multiplexing: select and poll function

Operating System Structure

Synchronization: Basics

What Is A Process? Process States. Process Concept. Process Control Block (PCB) Process State Transition Diagram 9/6/2013. Process Fundamentals

Threads. lightweight processes

Threads. Jo, Heeseung

LSN 13 Linux Concurrency Mechanisms

Synchronization: Advanced

Reading Assignment 4. n Chapter 4 Threads, due 2/7. 1/31/13 CSE325 - Processes 1

ECE 650 Systems Programming & Engineering. Spring 2018

Network Programming / : Introduc2on to Computer Systems 21 st Lecture, April. 4, Instructors: Todd Mowry and Anthony Rowe

CSC209 Review. Yeah! We made it!

CSE 153 Design of Operating Systems Fall 2018

Process Management! Goals of this Lecture!

Concurrent Programming. Concurrent Programming with Processes and Threads

CSC209H Lecture 11. Dan Zingaro. March 25, 2015

Inter-Process Communication. Disclaimer: some slides are adopted from the book authors slides with permission 1

Contents. IPC (Inter-Process Communication) Representation of open files in kernel I/O redirection Anonymous Pipe Named Pipe (FIFO)

Threads. studykorner.org

ECE 650 Systems Programming & Engineering. Spring 2018

Transcription:

15-213 The course that gives CMU its Zip! Concurrent Servers Dec 3, 2002 Topics! Limitations of iterative servers! Process-based concurrent servers! Event-based concurrent servers! Threads-based concurrent servers Iterative Servers Iterative servers process one request at a time. ret read client 1 server client 2 write write ret read class28.ppt 2 15-213, F 02 Fundamental Flaw of Iterative Servers call fgets User goes out to lunch Client 1 blocks waiting for user to type in data client 1 server client 2 Server blocks waiting for data from Client 1 Solution: use concurrent servers instead. Client 2 blocks waiting to complete its connection request until after lunch!! Concurrent servers use multiple concurrent flows to serve multiple clients at the same time. 3 15-213, F 02 Concurrent Servers Concurrent servers handle multiple requests concurrently. client 1 server client 2 call fgets User goes out to lunch child 1 fork call fgets fork Client 1 child 2 write blocks call waiting for... read user to type in data write end read 4 15-213, F 02

Three Basic Mechanisms for Creating Concurrent Flows 1. Processes! Kernel automatically interleaves multiple logical flows.! Each flow has its own private address space. 2. I/O multiplexing with select()! User manually interleaves multiple logical flows.! Each flow shares the same address space.! Popular for high-performance server designs. 3. Threads! Kernel automatically interleaves multiple logical flows.! Each flow shares the same address space.! Hybrid of processes and I/O multiplexing! 5 15-213, F 02 Process-Based Concurrent Server * echoserverp.c - A concurrent echo server based on processes * Usage: echoserverp <port> #include <ics.h> #define BUFSIZE 1024 void echo(int connfd); void handler(int sig); int main(int argc, char **argv) int listenfd, connfd; int portno; struct sockaddr_in clientaddr; int clientlen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in); if (argc!= 2) fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s <port>\n", argv[0]); exit(0); portno = atoi(argv[1]); listenfd = open_listenfd(portno); 6 15-213, F 02 Process-Based Concurrent Server (cont) Signal(SIGCHLD, handler); parent must reap children! main server loop while (1) connfd = Accept(listenfd, (struct sockaddr *) &clientaddr, &clientlen)); if (Fork() == 0) Close(listenfd); child s its listening socket echo(connfd); child reads and echoes input line Close(connfd); child is done with this client exit(0); child exits Close(connfd); parent must connected socket! Process-Based Concurrent Server (cont) handler - reaps children as they terminate void handler(int sig) pid_t pid; int stat; while ((pid = waitpid(-1, &stat, WNOHANG)) > 0) ; return; 7 15-213, F 02 8 15-213, F 02

Implementation Issues With Process-Based Designs Server should restart accept call if it is interrupted by a transfer of control to the SIGCHLD handler! Not necessary for systems with POSIX signal handling. " Our Signal wrapper tells kernel to automatically restart accept! Required for portability on some older Unix systems. Server must reap zombie children! to avoid fatal memory leak. Server must its copy of connfd.! Kernel keeps reference for each socket.! After fork, refcnt(connfd) = 2.! Connection will not be d until refcnt(connfd)=0. 9 15-213, F 02 Pros and Cons of Process-Based Designs + Handles multiple connections concurrently + Clean sharing model! descriptors (no)! file tables (yes)! global variables (no) + Simple and straightforward. - Additional overhead for process control. - Nontrivial to share data between processes.! Requires IPC (interprocess communication) mechanisms FIFO s (named pipes), System V shared memory and semaphores I/O multiplexing provides more control with less overhead... 10 15-213, F 02 Event-Based Concurrent Servers Using I/O Multiplexing Maintain a pool of connected descriptors. Repeat the following forever:! Use the Unix select function to block until: " (a) New connection request arrives on the listening descriptor. " (b) New data arrives on an existing connected descriptor.! If (a), add the new connection to the pool of connections.! If (b), read any available data from the connection " Close connection on EOF and remove it from the pool. The select Function select() sleeps until one or more file descriptors in the set readset are ready for reading. #include <sys/select.h> int select(int maxfdp1, fd_set *readset, NULL, NULL, NULL); readset Opaque bit vector (max FD_SETSIZE bits) that indicates membership in a descriptor set. If bit k is 1, then descriptor k is a member of the descriptor set. maxfdp1 Maximum descriptor in descriptor set plus 1. Tests descriptors 0, 1, 2,..., maxfdp1-1 for set membership. select() returns the number of ready descriptors and sets each bit of readset to indicate the ready status of its corresponding descriptor. 11 15-213, F 02 12 15-213, F 02

Macros for Manipulating Set Descriptors void FD_ZERO(fd fd_set *fdset* fdset);! Turn off all bits in fdset. void FD_SET(int fd, fd_set *fdset* fdset);! Turn on bit fd in fdset. void FD_CLR(int fd, fd_set *fdset* fdset);! Turn off bit fd in fdset. int FD_ISSET(int fd,, *fdset* fdset);! Is bit fd in fdset turned on? select Example * main loop: wait for connection request or stdin command. * If connection request, then echo input line * and connection. If stdin command, then process. printf("server> "); fflush(stdout); while (notdone) * select: check if the user typed something to stdin or * if a connection request arrived. FD_ZERO(&readfds); initialize the fd set FD_SET(listenfd, &readfds); add socket fd FD_SET(0, &readfds); add stdin fd (0) Select(listenfd+1, &readfds, NULL, NULL, NULL); 13 15-213, F 02 14 15-213, F 02 select Example (cont) First we check for a pending event on stdin. if the user has typed a command, process it if (FD_ISSET(0, &readfds)) fgets(buf, BUFSIZE, stdin); switch (buf[0]) case 'c': print the connection count printf("received %d conn. requests so far.\n", connectcnt); printf("server> "); fflush(stdout); break; case 'q': terminate the server notdone = 0; break; default: bad input printf("error: unknown command\n"); printf("server> "); fflush(stdout); 15 15-213, F 02 select Example (cont) Next we check for a pending connection request. if a connection request has arrived, process it if (FD_ISSET(listenfd, &readfds)) connfd = Accept(listenfd, (struct sockaddr *) &clientaddr, &clientlen); connectcnt++; bzero(buf, BUFSIZE); Rio_readn(connfd, buf, BUFSIZE); Rio_writen(connfd, buf, strlen(buf)); Close(connfd); while 16 15-213, F 02

Event-based Concurrent Echo Server * echoservers.c - A concurrent echo server based on select #include "csapp.h" typedef struct represents a pool of connected descriptors int maxfd; largest descriptor in read_set fd_set read_set; set of all active descriptors fd_set ready_set; subset of descriptors ready for reading int nready; number of ready descriptors from select int maxi; highwater index into client array int clientfd[fd_setsize]; set of active descriptors rio_t clientrio[fd_setsize]; set of active read buffers pool; int byte_cnt = 0; counts total bytes received by server 17 15-213, F 02 Event-based Concurrent Server (cont) int main(int argc, char **argv) int listenfd, connfd, clientlen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in); struct sockaddr_in clientaddr; static pool pool; listenfd = Open_listenfd(argv[1]); init_pool(listenfd, &pool); while (1) pool.ready_set = pool.read_set; pool.nready = Select(pool.maxfd+1, &pool.ready_set, NULL, NULL, NULL); if (FD_ISSET(listenfd, &pool.ready_set)) connfd = Accept(listenfd, (SA *)&clientaddr,&clientlen); add_client(connfd, &pool); check_clients(&pool); 18 15-213, F 02 Event-based Concurrent Server (cont) initialize the descriptor pool void init_pool(int listenfd, pool *p) Initially, there are no connected descriptors int i; p->maxi = -1; for (i=0; i< FD_SETSIZE; i++) p->clientfd[i] = -1; Initially, listenfd is only member of select read set p->maxfd = listenfd; FD_ZERO(&p->read_set); FD_SET(listenfd, &p->read_set); 19 15-213, F 02 Event-based Concurrent Server (cont) void add_client(int connfd, pool *p) add connfd to pool p int i; p->nready--; for (i = 0; i < FD_SETSIZE; i++) Find available slot if (p->clientfd[i] < 0) p->clientfd[i] = connfd; Rio_readinitb(&p->clientrio[i], connfd); FD_SET(connfd, &p->read_set); Add desc to read set if (connfd > p->maxfd) Update max descriptor num p->maxfd = connfd; if (i > p->maxi) Update pool high water mark p->maxi = i; break; if (i == FD_SETSIZE) Couldn't find an empty slot app_error("add_client error: Too many clients"); 20 15-213, F 02

Event-based Concurrent Server (cont) void check_clients(pool *p) echo line from ready descs in pool p int i, connfd, n; char buf[maxline]; rio_t rio; for (i = 0; (i <= p->maxi) && (p->nready > 0); i++) connfd = p->clientfd[i]; rio = p->clientrio[i]; If the descriptor is ready, echo a text line from it if ((connfd > 0) && (FD_ISSET(connfd, &p->ready_set))) p->nready--; if ((n = Rio_readlineb(&rio, buf, MAXLINE))!= 0) byte_cnt += n; Rio_writen(connfd, buf, n); else EOF detected, remove descriptor from pool Close(connfd); FD_CLR(connfd, &p->read_set); p->clientfd[i] = -1; 21 15-213, F 02 Pro and Cons of Event-Based Designs + One logical control flow. + Can single-step with a debugger. + No process or thread control overhead.! Design of choice for high-performance Web servers and search engines. - Significantly more complex to code than process- or thread-based designs. - Can be vulnerable to denial of service attack! How? Threads provide a middle ground between processes and I/O multiplexing... 22 15-213, F 02 Traditional View of a Process Process = process context + code, data, and stack Alternate View of a Process Process = thread + code, data, and kernel context Process context Code, data, and stack Thread (main thread) Code and Data Program context: Data registers Condition codes Stack pointer (SP) Program counter (PC) Kernel context: VM structures Descriptor table brk pointer SP brk PC 0 stack shared libraries run-time heap read/write data read-only code/data SP stack Thread context: Data registers Condition codes Stack pointer (SP) Program counter (PC) brk PC 0 shared libraries run-time heap read/write data read-only code/data Kernel context: VM structures Descriptor table brk pointer 23 15-213, F 02 24 15-213, F 02

A Process With Multiple Threads Multiple threads can be associated with a process! Each thread has its own logical control flow (sequence of PC values)! Each thread shares the same code, data, and kernel context! Each thread has its own thread id (TID) Thread 1 (main thread) stack 1 Thread 1 context: Data registers Condition codes SP1 PC1 0 Shared code and data shared libraries run-time heap read/write data read-only code/data Thread 2 (peer thread) stack 2 Thread 2 context: Data registers Condition codes SP2 PC2 Kernel context: VM structures Descriptor table brk pointer 25 15-213, F 02 Logical View of Threads Threads associated with a process form a pool of peers.! Unlike processes which form a tree hierarchy Threads associated with process foo T1 T5 T2 shared code, data and kernel context T3 T4 Process hierarchy bar 26 15-213, F 02 P0 P1 sh sh sh foo Concurrent Thread Execution Two threads run concurrently (are concurrent) if their logical flows overlap in time. Otherwise, they are sequential. Examples:! Concurrent: A & B, A&C! Sequential: B & C Time Thread A Thread B Thread C Threads vs. Processes How threads and processes are similar! Each has its own logical control flow.! Each can run concurrently.! Each is context switched. How threads and processes are different! Threads share code and data, processes (typically) do not.! Threads are somewhat less expensive than processes. " Process control (creating and reaping) is twice as expensive as thread control. " Linux/Pentium III numbers:» ~20K cycles to create and reap a process.» ~10K cycles to create and reap a thread. 27 15-213, F 02 28 15-213, F 02

Posix Threads (Pthreads) Interface Pthreads: Standard interface for ~60 functions that manipulate threads from C programs.! Creating and reaping threads. " pthread_create " pthread_join! Determining your thread ID " pthread_self! Terminating threads " pthread_cancel " pthread_exit " exit [terminates all threads], ret [terminates current thread]! Synchronizing access to shared variables " pthread_mutex_init " pthread_mutex_[un]lock " pthread_cond_init " pthread_cond_[timed]wait 29 15-213, F 02 The Pthreads "hello, world" Program * hello.c - Pthreads "hello, world" program #include "csapp.h" void *thread(void *vargp); int main() pthread_t tid; Pthread_create(&tid, NULL, thread, NULL); Pthread_join(tid, NULL); exit(0); thread routine void *thread(void *vargp) printf("hello, world!\n"); return NULL; Thread attributes (usually NULL) Thread arguments (void *p) return value (void **p) 30 15-213, F 02 Execution of Threaded hello, world call Pthread_create() Pthread_create() returns call Pthread_join() main thread waits for peer thread to terminate Pthread_join() returns exit() terminates main thread and any peer threads main thread peer thread printf() return NULL; (peer thread terminates) 31 15-213, F 02 Thread-Based Concurrent Echo Server int main(int argc, char **argv) int listenfd, *connfdp, port, clientlen; struct sockaddr_in clientaddr; pthread_t tid; if (argc!= 2) fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s <port>\n", argv[0]); exit(0); port = atoi(argv[1]); listenfd = open_listenfd(port); while (1) clientlen = sizeof(clientaddr); connfdp = Malloc(sizeof(int)); *connfdp = Accept(listenfd, (SA *) &clientaddr, &clientlen); Pthread_create(&tid, NULL, thread, connfdp); 32 15-213, F 02

Thread-Based Concurrent Server (cont) * thread routine void *thread(void *vargp) int connfd = *((int *)vargp); Pthread_detach(pthread_self()); Free(vargp); echo_r(connfd); reentrant version of echo() Close(connfd); return NULL; 33 15-213, F 02 Issues With Thread-Based Servers Must run detached to avoid memory leak.! At any point in time, a thread is either joinable or detached.! Joinable thread can be reaped and killed by other threads. " must be reaped (with pthread_join) to free memory resources.! Detached thread cannot be reaped or killed by other threads. " resources are automatically reaped on termination.! Default state is joinable. " use pthread_detach(pthread_self()) to make detached. Must be careful to avoid unintended sharing.! For example, what happens if we pass the address of connfd to the thread routine? " Pthread_create(&tid, NULL, thread, (void *)&connfd); All functions called by a thread must be thread-safe! (next lecture) 34 15-213, F 02 Pros and Cons of Thread-Based Designs + Easy to share data structures between threads! e.g., logging information, file cache. + Threads are more efficient than processes. --- Unintentional sharing can introduce subtle and hard- to-reproduce errors!! The ease with which data can be shared is both the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of threads.! (next lecture) 35 15-213, F 02