RRFSS 2012: Cell Phone Use and Texting While Driving

Similar documents
Survey Questions and Methodology

Survey Questions and Methodology

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

The Smartphone Consumer June 2012

The Rise of the Connected Viewer

Spring Change Assessment Survey 2010 Final Topline 6/4/10 Data for April 29 May 30, 2010

Simmons OneView SM. How to Interpret Quick Reports Simmons OneView: How to Interpret Quick Reports Page 1

Smartphone Ownership 2013 Update

Topline Questionnaire

Telephone Survey Response: Effects of Cell Phones in Landline Households

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Young Drivers Report the Highest Level of Phone Involvement in Crash or Near-Crash Incidences. Research Note

Customer Insights Customer Insights

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS

2017 NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE SURVEY ON OUR HEALTH AND WELL BEING Methodology Report December 1, 2017

Local Search Insights

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

Executive Summary on. Privacy Awareness Survey on Smartphones. and Smartphone Apps

Segmented or Overlapping Dual Frame Samples in Telephone Surveys

Understanding Local Mobile Consumer Behavior

Mobile Access July 7, 2010 Aaron Smith, Research Specialist.

How to extract suicide statistics by country from the. WHO Mortality Database Online Tool

Texting distracted driving behaviour among European drivers: influence of attitudes, subjective norms and risk perception

CHART BOOK: HAND-HELD MOBILE DEVICE USE TRENDS FOR MISSISSIPPI ADULTS

November 2016 G. Oscar Anderson, Senior Research Advisor AARP Research

Supporting Growth in Society and Industry Using Statistical Data from Mobile Terminal Networks Overview of Mobile Spatial Statistics

Summary of the impact of the inclusion of mobile phone numbers into the NSW Population Health Survey in 2012

Do you use the internet, at least occasionally, for example on either a computer or a cell phone?

The State of the Trust Gap in 2015

August Tracking Survey 2011 Final Topline 8/30/2011

DATA MEMO. The volume of spam is growing in Americans personal and workplace accounts, but users are less bothered by it.

HTC Data Use Tool - User s Manual

App-nesia in the UK The need for app re-engagement marketing

Deloitte TMT Predictions 2018

LR01 - New Enrollment for Legally-Exempt Care Window

The Growing Gap between Landline and Dual Frame Election Polls

PACT Analysis. People. Windows 8 phone: TWEENS: girls aged years old, inbetween child and teen

WHO STEPS Surveillance Support Materials. STEPS Epi Info Training Guide

2012 Cell Phone Consumer Attitudes Study

T H E S H I F T T O SMARTPHONE DOMINANCE

Holiday Shopping With Mobile Phones October 2010

australian multi-screen report QUARTER 4, 2011 trends in video viewership beyond conventional television sets

Retrospective Abuse Report Form

LR01 - New Enrollment for Legally-Exempt Care Window

Appendix B: Topline Questionnaire

Dual-Frame Sample Sizes (RDD and Cell) for Future Minnesota Health Access Surveys

BY Aaron Smith and Kenneth Olmstead

Mobile data usage & habits of MENA Internet users. Research conducted by Effective Measure in conjunction with Spot On PR January 2011

Dual-Band VoIP With Walls. Dual-Band VoIP With Walls

CHAPTER - 7 MARKETING IMPLICATIONS, LIMITATIONS AND SCOPE FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

CELEBRATING 20 YEARS Q2 2018

2013 CONSUMER MOBILE INSIGHTS STUDY!

Annual Gadgets Survey Final Topline 4/21/06

Based on all adults [n=1907]

Page 1 of 6 SURVEY: PROJECT TECH

Post PC Era: Mobile Banking & Payments in Emerging Markets. Report Covers: India, Kenya, Indonesia, Ghana and Nigeria

N.J. drivers continue to roll the dice with safety

DISCOVERABILITY. How Canadians Find TV Content

Web+Mail as a Mixed-Mode Solution to General Public Survey Challenges in the United States

Washington Driver Survey Distracted Driving Attitudes & Behavior

Contents. 1. Survey Background and Methodology. 2. Summary of Key Findings. 3. Survey Results. 4. Appendix

Landline and Cell Phone Usage Patterns in a Large Urban Setting: Results from the 2008 New York City Community Health Survey

THE HEADPHONE MARKET Hefio Survey

Mobile Internet & Smartphone Adoption

Topline questionnaire

January 2018 Core Trends Survey Final Topline 2/9/2018 Abt Associates for Pew Research Center

WORKSHOP: Using the Health Survey for England, 2014

NRS STATE DATA QUALITY CHECKLIST

AT&T Disaster Preparedness Survey Hurricane Katrina & Rita Results. August 2006

Small area statistics on de jure and de facto populations

Our Changing Infrastructure

Surviving SPSS.

Mobile Data for Public and Personal Health

86.1% of the population aged 16 to 74 have used the Internet in the last three months. 72.1% do it on a daily basis

Disrupting the Personal Lives

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Internet, Science & Tech RESEARCH AREAS. Mobile Fact Sheet MORE FACT SHEETS: INTERNET/BROADBAND SOCIAL MEDIA

65% say that they wouldn t want to go back to life without their Smart Speaker

How to Use the Cancer-Rates.Info/NJ

A STUDY ON SMART PHONE USAGE AMONG YOUNGSTERS AT AGE GROUP (15-29)

Use this task to submit a marriage life event in the UCPath website.

Cell and Landline Phone Usage Patterns among Young Adults and the Potential for Nonresponse Error in RDD Surveys

Almost half of all internet users now use search engines on a typical day

emarketer US Social Network Usage StatPack

Practical Issues in Conducting Cell Phone Polling

Social Sharing in the Mobile World. January 2017

Does Underlining Links Help or Hurt?

DATA MEMO. BY: PIP Senior Research Fellow Deborah Fallows ( )

In CiCS (Corporate Information and Computing Services) we are always looking to improve our services.

Anthem Mobile Provider Finder

5 Internet and online content

Norton Online Reputation Report: Why Millennials should manage their online footprint

Testimony of Lisa McCabe Director, State Legislative Affairs CTIA Support for Michigan Senate Bill 637 November 2, 2017

McLean BASIS plus TM. Sample Hospital. Report for April thru June 2012 BASIS-24 APR-JUN. McLean Hospital

US 2013 Consumer Data Privacy Study Mobile Edition

2013 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer Mexico Consumer Results. October

Technology adoption by lower income populations

Longitudinal Linkage of Cross-Sectional NCDS Data Files Using SPSS

Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)

Transcription:

Figure 1 Table 1.The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving, HKPR District, 2012 Response Percent Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Yes 29.0 25.83 32.24 No 71.0 67.76 74.17 The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving is 29.0% (95% CI: 25.83, 32.24). Page 1 of 11

Figure 2 Table 2.The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving, by sex, HKPR District, 2012 Sex Response Percent Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Male Yes 35.4 30.38 40.89 Female Yes 24.4 20.58 28.51 Male No 64.6 59.11 69.62 Female No 75.6 71.49 79.42 The percent of males (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving is 35.4% (95% CI: 30.38, 40.89). The percent of females (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving is 24.4% (95% CI: 20.58, 28.51). Page 2 of 11

Figure 3 Table 3.The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device by frequency, HKPR District, 2012 Response Percent Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Every time/most times 4.6 3.38 6.32 Sometimes 8.4 6.68 10.64 Seldom 15.8 13.43 18.60 Never 71.0 67.76 74.17 The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who never talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device is 71.0% (95% CI: 67.76, 74.17). The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who seldom talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device is 15.8% (95% CI: 13.43, 18.60). Page 3 of 11

The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who sometimes talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device is 8.4% (95% CI: 6.68, 10.64). The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device every time/most times they drive is 4.6% (95% CI: 3.38, 6.32). Page 4 of 11

Figure 4 Table 4.The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode, by frequency, HKPR District, 2012 Response Percent Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Every time/most times 59.4 52.82 65.72 Never 28.8 23.23 35.11 Sometimes *7.0 4.32 11.44 Seldom *4.6 2.44 8.75 The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode every time/most times they drive is 59.4% (95% CI: 52.82, 65.72). The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who never talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode is 28.8% (95% CI: 23.3, 35.11). Page 5 of 11

The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who sometimes talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode is 7.0% (95% CI: 4.32, 11.44). The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who seldom talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode is 4.6% (95% CI: 2.44, 8.75). Page 6 of 11

Figure 5 Table 5.The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode, by frequency, by sex, HKPR District, 2012 Sex Response Percent Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Male Every time/most times 56.8 47.59 65.56 Female Every time/most times 62.2 52.54 70.88 Male Sometimes *9.2 4.90 16.60 Female Sometimes **.. Male Seldom **.. Female Seldom **.. Male Never 29.6 22.01 38.52 Female Never 28.0 20.27 37.27 Page 7 of 11

The percent of male drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode every time/most times they drive is 56.8% (95% CI: 47.59, 65.56). The percent of male drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who sometimes talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode is 9.2% (95% CI: 4.90, 16.60). The percent of male drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who seldom talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode has been suppressed for data quality. The percent of male drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who never talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode is 29.6% (95% CI: 22.01, 38.52). The percent of female drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode every time/most times they drive is 62.2% (95% CI: 52.54, 70.88). The percent of female drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who sometimes talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode has been suppressed for data quality. The percent of female drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who talk seldom on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode has been suppressed for data quality. The percent of female drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who never talk on a cell phone, Smartphone, tablet or any other mobile or wireless device while driving and use a hands-free mode is 28.0% (95% CI: 20.27, 37.27). Page 8 of 11

Figure 6 Table 6.The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who ever send or read text messages or email while driving, HKPR District, 2012 Response Percent Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Yes 17.2 14.58 20.22 No 82.8 79.78 85.42 The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who ever send or read text messages or email while driving is 17.2% (95% CI: 14.58, 20.22). Page 9 of 11

Figure 7 Table 7.The percent of adult drivers (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who ever send or read text messages or email while driving, by sex, HKPR District, 2012 Sex Response Percent Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Male Yes 20.2 15.94 25.25 Female Yes 15.2 11.94 18.95 Male No 79.8 74.75 84.06 Female No 84.8 81.05 88.06 The percent of males (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who ever send or read text messages or email while driving is 20.2% (95% CI: 15.94, 25.25). The percent of females (18 years +) residing in the HKPR District who ever send or read text messages or email while driving is 15.2% (95% CI: 11.94, 18.95). Page 10 of 11

Data Limitations: 1. Questions are only asked of adult residents aged 18+. 2. The telephone survey is only conducted in English. 3. Results are based on self-reported behaviours. 4. (*) indicates that results are based on small sample size; thus, estimates have high variability. 5. (**) indicates the data is not released due to small sample size. Data Notes: 1. Source: Rapid Risk Factor Surveillance System (RRFSS), Jan - Dec 2012, Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge (HKPR) District Health Unit and Institute for Social Research (ISR), York University. 2. Missing responses are not included in the analysis. 3. Do not know and Refused responses are analyzed according to RRFSS Analysis Guidelines. 4. The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are the range of variability for a population estimate. There is a 95% probability that the true estimate is within that range. 5. Release criteria of the data are according to RRFSS Analysis Guidelines. 6. ( ) If the 95% confidence intervals of estimates do not overlap, the estimates are significantly different (i.e., if the lower confidence interval of estimate A is > the upper confidence interval of estimate B, the estimates are statistically significant). However, if confidence intervals do overlap, it is not necessarily true that estimates are not different. Page 11 of 11